+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

Date post: 11-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: emile
View: 33 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review. Project Advisor: Dr. Thomas Schmid Clinic Team Members: Skyler Kershner, Benjamin Sondelski , Trevor Nichols, Shayan Barzagari , Zhao Qi. Presentation Overview. Project Background Goals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
37
Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review Project Advisor: Dr. Thomas Schmid Clinic Team Members: Skyler Kershner, Benjamin Sondelski, Trevor Nichols, Shayan Barzagari, Zhao Qi
Transcript
Page 1: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic ProjectDynamic Line Rating

Preliminary Design Review

Project Advisor: Dr. Thomas SchmidClinic Team Members: Skyler Kershner, Benjamin Sondelski, Trevor Nichols, Shayan Barzagari, Zhao Qi

Page 2: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

2

Presentation Overview

• Project Background

• Goals

• Proposed Solution

• Additional Considerations

• System Implementation

• Model

• Expected Results

• Budget / Timeline

Page 3: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

3

Project Background• Overhead Conductor Sag

• National Electrical Safety Code specifies minimum clearance

• As conductor heats, sag increases• Environmental, power considerations• Dynamic line rating system needed

[1] Clearance Levels

Page 4: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

4

Project Goals• Develop dynamic line rating system

– Combine best characteristics of commercially available models

– Simple design

• Implement system in a model

• Validate collected data

[2] Line Sag Illustration

Page 5: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

5

Proposed Method: Thermal Imaging

• Directly measures sag and line temperature• Non-contact measurement

[4] Configuration

[5] Camera View

Page 6: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

6

Proposed Method: Thermal Imaging

• Provides high contrast images, temperature measurement• Image processing tracks lowest point in line

[6] Thermal Image

Page 7: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

7

Proposed Method: Thermal Imaging

• Limitation: Cost

Model Price

FLIR T620 $19,500

FLIR SC325 $13,500

FLIR E60 $7,500

[7]

[8]

[9]

Page 8: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

8

Conclusion• Need for dynamic line rating• Goals• Thermal imaging as potential solution• Limitations of thermal imaging

– Other methods needed

Contact Info:Skyler [email protected]

References

Page 9: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

9

Zhao – Overview

• Tension as a solution

• Sag – Tension rating and calculation

• Design Problems/Solutions

• Conclusion

Page 10: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

10

Tension as a Possible Solution

• All-Inclusive Measurement–line temperature, environment temperature, solar

absorption • Accuracy

• Low-Power Draw

Page 11: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

11

• D – Vertical sag

S – Horizontal length of the span W – Unit weight of the conductor Tr – Resultant conductor tension Th – Horizontal component of tension

Fig. 1 Parabolic Sag Curve

Sag-Tension Rating and Calculations

[10]

Page 12: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

12

Tension as a Possible Problem

• Cost• Actual implementation

– Required line outage for installation

• Ice and wind loading

• Length of Conductor–Stretching and high temperatures

Page 13: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

13

Design Problems/Solutions• Ice loading

• Wind loadingFor structures below 60 feet:

For structures exceed 60 feet:

• Resultant ice and wind loading

Page 14: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

14

Conclusion• Overview of Sag- Tension• Tension advantages • Tension problems/Solutions

References:[1]- “Overhead Conductor Manual”, 2nd Edition, Southwire Company, 2007

[2]- IEEE “Guide to the Installation of Overhead Transmission Line Conductor”, 2004

[3]- IEEE “Guide on Conductor Self-Damping Measurements”, 1978

[4]- “Sag and Tension”, Sep. 20, 2011. [online]. Available:

http://www.iaei.org/magazine/2004/05/the-effects-of-ruling-span-on-sag-and-tension/

Contact information:

Zhao Qi

ECE department, University of Utah

[email protected]

Page 15: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

15

Trevor – Overview

• Magnetic Field Sensing

• Implementation difficulties

• Project Difficulties

• Build a model - advantages

• Conclusion

Page 16: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

16

Magnetic Field Sensor

Three Axis Magnetic Field Sensor

MAGNETOMETER RS232 W/CASE

• High Accuracy, <0.5% Full Scale• 10 to 154 Sample/Sec• Low Power consumption• Input voltage range 6 to 15 (VDC)

[11]

Page 17: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

17

Magnetic Field Measurement Difficulties

Page 18: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

18

Project Difficulties

• Field Deployment of Prototype–Power–Communication

• Uncontrollable variables

• Budget

Page 19: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

19

Build a Model

• Test wide range of aspects

• Control experiment variables and environment

• Develop realistically implementable solutions

• Retain a low budget

Page 20: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

20

Conclusion

• Magnetic Sensing• Magnetic Difficulties• Project Difficulties• Advantages of Model

References:[11] “Smart Digital Magnetometer HMR2300”, Sep. 30, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/myaerospace-

catalogdocuments/Missiles-Munitions/HMR2300.pdf.

Contact Information:Trevor Nichols

[email protected]

801-710-2173

Page 21: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

21

Shayan – Overview

• Proposed Solution

• Math Defining Model Requirements

• Measuring Temperature

• Conclusion

Page 22: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

22

Proposed Solution

• Mock thermal imaging system

[12] [13]

• Build a model scaled down to 30:1 ratioApproximately 600 feet scaled to 20 feet

• Measure sag in a controlled environmentClinic Lab – Merrill Engineering Building 2350

• Develop an effective dynamic line rating system

Page 23: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

23

Math defining model • Tension in the line – direct effect of line temperature

• Temperature – direct effect of amount of line current

• Amperage – controlled system input

Page 24: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

24

Measuring Temperature

Page 25: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

25

Measuring Temperature

Page 26: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

26

Conclusion

• Proposed Solution• Characteristics of Model• Mock thermal imaging

–IR thermometer–IR video camera

References:[12] “IR Thermo Gun”, Sep. 29, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://chaermai.en.ecplaza.net/2.asp.

[13] “IR Security Camera”, Sep. 29, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=224174617&listingid=157870950&&

Contact Information:Shayan Barzegari

[email protected]

801-824-8492

Page 27: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

Benjamin – Overview • benefits of in-house scale model• power supply• electrical diagram• conductor span• expected model performance

27

Page 28: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

28

Benefits of In-House Scale Model

• communications• controlled environment

–simple comparison to IEEE 738

–no exposure to weather• verification of thermal time

constant• test bed for future clinics

Page 29: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

29

Power Supply

• need 480V, 3 phase• 208V 3 phase is available• 2kVA each• power supply losses

Page 30: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

30

Model Electrical Diagram

National Electrical Code:• bonding and grounding• conductor sizing• overcurrent protection• ground detector

Page 31: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

31

Conductor Span

• 1½″ PVC structure (FORMUFIT connectors)• transparent covering (acrylic or polycarbonate)

• dead-end attachments

Page 32: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

32

Expected Model Performance

• 20′ span• 200lbs tension at 25°C• Sparrow ACSR

Page 33: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

Physical Model: Conclusion• benefits of in-house scale model• power supply• electrical diagram• conductor span• expected model performance

33

• contactBenjamin Sondelski(801) [email protected]

• references[1]National Fire Protection Association, "National Electrical Code," Boston,

national standard NFPA 70, 2008.

Page 34: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

34

Budget

Item Specs Model Source Each Qty Ext

Pipe, PVC 1-1/2″ Schedule 40 10 ′ Home Depot $ 4.59 18 $ 82.62

4-way PVC tee 1-1/2″ FORMUFIT $ 3.10 10 $ 31.00

3-way PVC Elbow 1-1/2″ FORMUFIT $ 3.00 10 $ 30.00

Turnbuckle 3/8″ stainless Model # 7112 Store SKU # 372074 Home Depot $ 8.42 2 $ 16.84

Plywood 3/4″×24″×24″ Model # 300950 Store SKU # 300950 Home Depot $ 9.17 2 $ 18.34

PVC Cement $10.00 1 $ 10.00

Hardware Misc $20.00 1 $ 20.00

Arduino Programmable Controller Radio Shack $40.00 1 $ 40.00

IR Therm Home Depot $20.00 1 $ 20.00

Servo 180 degree Pivot Radio Shack $20.00 1 $ 20.00

IR Camera 2 Mexapixel newegg.com $70.00 1 $ 70.00

Total $ 358.80

Page 35: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

35

Timeline

Year   2011    2012       

Month Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr.

Task  

1 Background Resarch

2 Design Model

3 Build Model

4 Test Model

5 Analyze Data

6 Adjust Model

7 Finalize Model

8Implement exterior Cond.

9 Devolop dynamic rating

10 Document

Page 36: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

36

CONCLUSION

• Measure Sag• Build a Model• Desirable:

• Measure Conductor Temperature • Due to budget, use Temp Sensor and IR

Camera• Validate Measurement

• Measuring Tension • Magnetic Sensor

Page 37: Rocky Mountain Power 2011 Clinic Project Dynamic Line Rating Preliminary Design Review

37

Contact Info / References

References[1] “Clearance Levels”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.pge.com/mybusiness/customerservice/otherrequests/treetrimming/faq/orchard/index.shtml.

[2] “Line Sag Illustration”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://redefinescience.blogspot.com/2011/05/power-lines.html.

[3] “Tension Illustration”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.ehow.com/how_8049821_calculate-transmission-line-tension.html.

[4] “Configuration”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=139418&page=274.

[5] ”Power Line View”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://forcechange.com/2190/proposed-legislation-would-speed-up-permitting-process-for-transmission-lines.

[6] “Thermal Image”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.x20.org/thermal/.

[7] “FLIR T620”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.flir.com/thermography/americas/us/content/?id=18118.

[8] “FLIR SC325”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.flir.com/thermography/americas/us/content/?id=31095.

[9] “FLIR E60”, Oct. 3, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.flir.com/thermography/americas/us/content/?id=36820.

[10] “Sag and Tension”, Sep. 20, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.iaei.org/magazine/2004/05/the-effects-of-ruling-span-on-sag-and-tension/

[11] “Smart Digital Magnetometer HMR2300”, Sep. 30, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/common/documents/myaerospacecatalog-documents/Missiles-Munitions/HMR2300.pdf.

[12] “IR Thermo Gun”, Sep. 29, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://chaermai.en.ecplaza.net/2.asp.

[13] “IR Security Camera”, Sep. 29, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=224174617&listingid=157870950&&

Rocky Mountain Power Clinic TeamElectrical and Computer Engineering Department

University of [email protected]


Recommended