Rodger W. BybeeExecutive Director (Retired)

Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS)

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR STATE SCIENCE EDUCATION

Denver, Colorado

20-21 June 2014

TRANSLATING NGSS FOR CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION: TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

A STANDARD

ADDRESS TEACHERS’ CONCERNS

The composite representation of the feelings, preoccupation, thought, and consideration given to a particular issue or task is called a concern.

All in all, the mental activity composed of questioning, analyzing, and re-analyzing, considering alternative actions and reactions, and anticipating consequences is concern.

Hall, G. and Hord, S. (2001). Implementing Change. Allyn and Bacon, pp. 61-62.

STAGES OF CONCERN: Typical Expressions of Concern about the Innovation

Stages of Concern Expressions of Concern 6 Refocusing I have some ideas about something that would work even better 5 Collaboration I am concerned about relating what I am doing with what my co-workers are doing. 4 Consequences How is my use affecting clients? 3 Management I seem to be spending all of my time getting materials ready. 2 Personal How will using it affect me? 1 Informational I would like to know more about it. 0 Awareness I am not concerned about it.

IMPACT

TASK

SELF

Hall, G. and Hord, S. (2001). Implementing Change, p. 61.

• Assessments “Will Assessments Change?”

• Curriculum “Are There Curriculum Materials I Can Use?”

• Instruction “Are There Effective Instructional Strategies I Can Use?”

• Common Core State “Are There Connections to the Common Standards Core State Standards for English

Language Arts and Mathematics?”

• Professional Education of Teachers “What Knowledge and Skills Do Teachers Need to Implement NGSS?”

FROM NGSS TO CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION:TEACHERS’ CONCERNS

TRANSLATING STANDARDS FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION:SOME INSIGHTS

• Nothing perfectly aligns with the NGSS except the NGSS

• Accommodating the language of NGSS for the language of curriculum, instruction, and assessment

• Recognizing different dimensions of education—purpose, policy, program, and practice

• Understanding the limits and possibilities of translating standards and accepting the trade-offs

• Designing professional development based on teachers’ concerns and innovations implied by NGSS

TRANSLATING STANDARDS FOR CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION:DIMENSIONS

PURPOSEPurpose statements include the aims, goals, and rationales. These statements tend to be universal, abstract, and apply to all components of the science education system (e.g., teacher education, curriculum, instruction, and assessment). Although it presents elements of both purpose and policy, A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (NRC 2012) has served as the purpose in this era of standards-based reform.

POLICY

Policies are more specific statements of standards, benchmarks, syllabi, and action plans based on the defined purposes. Policy statements are concrete translations of the purpose and apply to specific components such as teacher education, K-12 curriculum, and assessments. The Next Generation Science Standards is the policy statement most applicable to this discussion.

PROGRAM

Programs are the actual materials, books, and software used in states, schools, and classrooms. Programs are unique to disciplines, K-12 grades, and levels in the education system. Curriculum materials for K-12 science and state assessments are different examples of programs. Programs are a translation of policies to the unique requirements of programs.

PRACTICE

Practice refers to the specific actions of educators as they implement the program. Classroom teaching of science is an example of practices. Practice is the most unique and fundamental level of translation.

NGSS AND MAJOR INNOVATIONS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

• Integration of Three Dimensions (SEP, DCI, CCC)

• Engineering Design and Nature of Science Incorporated as Practices or Crosscutting Concepts

• Performance Expectations as Learning Outcomes

• K-12 Learning Progressions

• Connections to Common Core State Standards

INSTRUCTIONAL SHIFTS

FROM TO• Science Facts and Concepts Science and Engineering

PracticesCrosscutting ConceptsDisciplinary Core Ideas

• Science Alone Science, Engineering,Nature of Science

• Science Facts and Concepts as Performance on Basis for Assessment 3 Dimensional Basis for

Assessments

• Grade-Level Content Coherent ProgressionAcross Grades of Conceptsand Practices

• Science Not a Basic Science and CCSS (EnglishLanguage Arts andMathematics)

MAKING SENSE OF NGSS INNOVATIONSTHE 5Cs

5Cs NGSS IMPLICATIONS FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION

Content Three Dimensions(SEP, DCI, CCC)

Integrated Instructional Sequence

Coupling Incorporation of Engineering Design and Nature of Science as Practices and

Crosscutting Concepts

Engineering and Nature of Science Integrated Across Curriculum

Competencies Performance Expectations Assessment

Curriculum Learning Progressions K-12 Science Program

Connections Common Core State Standards Links the Basics and Science

NGSS TO CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION

THERE IS A NEED FOR INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE NGSS INNOVATIONS.

-OPTIONS-

• Develop New Instructional Materials

• Adapt Current Materials

ADAPTING CURRENT INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS

• Think Beyond a Lesson to an Integrated Instructional Sequence (e.g., BSCS 5E Instructional Model)

• Identify a Coherent Set of Performance Expectations (e.g., bundle PEs using a topic, theme, or context)

• Clarify the Difference Between Learning Outcomes and Instructional Strategies (e.g., SEPs are BOTH learning outcomes and use instructional strategies)

• Consider How to Integrate Three Dimensions (e.g., use a framework for lesson, activities)

• Use Backward Design (e.g., develop the assessment/evaluate first)

LEVELS OF USE OF THE INNOVATION

VI RENEWAL

V INTEGRATION

IVB REFINEMENT

IVA ROUTINE

III MECHANICAL USE

II PREPARATION

I ORIENTATION

0 NONUSE

Hall, G. and Hord, S. (1987). Change in Schools. State University of New York Press, p. 84

CONCLUSION

THE SISYPHEAN QUESTION IN SCIENCE EDUCATION:

WHAT SHOULD THE SCIENTIFICALLY AND TECHNOLOGICALLY

LITERATE PERSON KNOW, VALUE, AND BE ABLE TO DO—

AS A CITIZEN?

(Bybee, 1985)

THANK YOU