ROINN COSANTA
BUREAU OF MILITARY HISTORY, 1913-21
STATEMENT BY WITNESS.
DOCUMENT NO. W.S. 1721.
Witness
Seumas Robinson
18 Highfield Foad, Rathgar,Dublin.
Identity.
O/C. South Tipperary Brigade.O/C. 2nd Southern Division, I.R.A.
Member of Volunteer Executive.Member of Bureau of Military History.
Subject.
Irish Volunteer activities, Dublin, 1916.
I.R.A.activities, Tipperary, 1917-1921
Conditions, if any, Stipulated by Witness.
Nil.
File No S.132.
Form BSM2
SEUMASROBINSON.
1902. Joined the first Fianna (Red Branch Knights); founded
by Bulmer Hobson in 1902, Belfast.
1902. Joined "Oscar" junior hurling club, Belfast.
1903. Joined Gaelic League, Glasgow.
1913. December. Joined the Irish Volunteers, (Glasgow.
1916. January. Attached to Kimmage Garrison.
1916. Easter Week. Stationed i/c. at Hopkins & Hopkins,O'Connell Street (Bride).
1916. May. Interned Richmond Barracks (one week), StaffordGaol, Frongoch, Reading Gaol. Released Christmas Day,1916.
1917. February. Assisted in reorganising the Volunteers inTipperary.
l9l8. October, Elected Brigadier, South Tipperary Brigade.
1920. Elected T.D. to Second Dáil, East Tipperary and Waterford.
1921. November December. Appointed O/C., 2nd Southern Division,I.R.A., in succession to E. O'Malley.
1922. Elected Member of Volunteer Executive.
l928. Elected Senator.
1935. January. Appointed Member of M.S.P. Board.
l949. Appointed Member, Bureau of Military History.
1953. (?) Appointed Member of Military Registration Board.
STATEMENTBY Mr. SEUMASROBINSON,
18, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin.
- Introduction -
"A SOLDIER OF IRELAND" REFLECTS.
Somewhere deep in the camera (or is it the anti-camera) of my
cerebrum (or is it my cerebellum"), whose loci, by the way, are the
frontal lobes of the cranium of this and every other specimen of
homo-sapiens - there lurks furtively and nebulously, nevertheless
positively, a thing, a something, a conception (deception'), a perception,
an inception, that the following agglomeration of reminiscences will be
"my last Will and Testament".
All of which is very profound, dear reader if you exist, dear
reader. The profundity is so profound it shows, or I hope it shows,
that I am being merely fecetious. This facetiousness is my camouflage
to hide my ingrained shyness.. Yet, in all seriousness I feel
compelled to squash my shyness and get on with my apologia - and I don't
mean "apology".
For the last thirty years or so I have felt the urge to do this
thing: to write my reminiscences, my "apologia pro vita sua" (my
apology for non-suicide), my message to future generations, my story.
You may call it "his story", if you wish, but oh, not "history", please.
History is for the historian to write. Those of us who were
involved in the making of our recent history were, and are still, like
the storied man in the forest who couldn't see the wood for the trees.
We were so intimately and urgently wrapped up in vital and mortal
details that we had no time or opportunity, whatever about our inclination,
2.
"to stand and stare" or to be "a chiel amang ye takin' notes" (unless
"your Grannie was Doherty") or to be bothered or distracted by
anything outside our immediate ken. No bird's-eye view for us! Each
responsible officer had to have, of course, his own mental bird's-eye
view of his own campaign and immediate tactics; but what happened to
the other trees in the forest was not his particular concern, and, so,
it should he left to the historian to collect and collate general data.
Details were much too close to our eyes for us to be able to focus them
and distant objects at the same time. In any case a bird's-eye view
would not convey to other minds a life-like picture of the forest
itself, or of the animate denizens of the forest - unless that bird had
also lived its life in the forest. And a bird that lives in a forest
is much more concerned with the absorbing facts of life, growth and
death in the forest than with the impersonal appearance of the wood
as a whole.
To change my metaphor: I have gathered like the cow so much
mental fodder in the last sixty odd years that all I want to do now is
to rest and chew the cud (not "chaw the rag") and, without any shyness
I say it: I pray my Maker that in spite of my inherent mental,
aesthetic and physical pettiness I may finally produce a little at
least of the milk of human kindness. if there be not much butter-fat
in my milk - well! isn't that a good reason for not skimming it?
I hope no 'cute critic will stigmatise my milk as "a mere bouvine
production" or brand my cream "scum!"
Please forgive another wooden metaphor. As I have already
suggested this statement will not aim at being a history: I wish it
to be regarded rather as a monologue on the mental meanderings of a
babe in the woods I will try to be guiless and candid and as
"wonder-full" as a child. Childlike (not childishly, I hope, though
3.
perhans, foolhardily) I will make statements on ethics, but statements
that I wish to be taken rather as postulations. To me they will be
dogmatic, I'd be self-deceptive otherwise, but I am humble enough to
realise that despite all my efforts to see things correctly I may be
objectively wrong. But I must be allowed to say of myself that I am
at least subjectively right and conscience clear. If my politico-
religious ethics be wrong, proved wrong, I will publicly burn this
statement.
Quite a large number of people have been asking me from time to
time, mostly importunately, during the last thirty odd years to write
my memoirs. Why, I don't know: unless perhaps on the general
principle that those of our generation who took or "who had thrust upon
them", some responsibility during the campaigns for independence from
1916 to 1923 should write their memoirs for the benefit of future
generations. Everyone's story is unique and will almost certainly be
of interest to someone and may be of interest to a whole section of the
community.
There are many books, pamphlets, stories and articles written about
and on our struggle for freedom. Many of them are factual - at least
a great deal of what they say deals with "facts". But that raises the
eternal question: "What is a fact?" Alie and a half"
Some "facts" of history as told by some historians, lie, I think,
mostly somewhere between half-a-lie and a lie-and-a-half. They never
present the whole absolute truth - and that is about the only constant
truth or fact in the records of all mundane history. Only an angel
can record the truth-absolute.
4.
We are taught that there are two kinds of truth: objective and
subjective. And though there is a whole infinite world of a difference
between them they must harmonise to strike a true chord. Objective
truth cannot be defined until God Himself can be defined. Subjective
truth is the sincere effort to reflect obective truth - the effort to
state unequivocally what we believe to be true. And I suppose that
would exonerate even the man who has "couéd" himself into fantastic
beliefs: his fault or sin, if any, lies in his previous acts of
"coué-ing" himself wrongly. Subjective truthfulness pre-supposes a
reasonable effort to find and to record objective truth.
In the light of the above dictums I believe that much of what is
written as history is neither subjectively nor objectively truthful -
least in its general trend, and often in its intent. History can "lie
like a trooper" by suppressio-veri, by wrongful juxta-positioning, by
wilfully drawing wrong or misleading conclusions, by over emphasis or
understatement, by "drawing red herrings" by "throwing monkey-wrenches"
and by crass ignorance; but mostly by paucity of judgment, lack of
charity or want of thought - "With desolation is all the land made
desolate because there is none that thinketh in the heart".
I think it well to record now that I had occasion to write the
"Irish Press" in connection with some publications dealing with South
Tipperary Brigade, but
I, II, III, IV
these letters were refused publication.
(SeeAppendices).
5.
Chanter 1.
We are told that Dean Swift cursed the day he was born. He
must have been a very precocious day-old chick! Now, it was God's
Will that I should not be born a precocious little chicken or duckling
either nor to become a precocious youth - but just a normal Irish
Catholic Nationalist boy. I hope that boy is still father to this man.
I had the advantage, shared by millions of others, of being born
into an normal Irish Catholic family. We were cursed (?) with bad
tempers but, thanks be to God, not with temperamentality. Our nervous
systems were highly strung but also very strong. Sparks of temper
would fly on occasions, but never an unprintable word. If my parents
are still in Purgatory, which God forbid, they are not there for any
curses or other bad language nor for giving bad example. Our faults
and failings as a fatly were many, but it was always a case of "thus
far shalt thou go and no farther."
There is nothing abnormal or unusual in all that: it is common
to Catholic families the world over. Like other normal Catholic young
people when a serious decision of judgement had to be made there was
always subconsciously present in our minds the subject-matter of the
last words of the 'Hail Mary': "now, and at the hour of our death,
Amen": "now" - the present decision; "the hour of our death" - the
ethics of that decision; "Amen" and be it so always I Religion and
praver were entirely undemonstrative, that is, there was neither
ostentation nor shyness. These things were taken for granted as
fundamental, necessary, logical, almost casual, but, under the rule
"thus far etc" no essential was ever ignored or skimmed, nor was
casuistry tolerated.
6.
I am saying all this for a purpose: I want to show that the
insurgent Separatists of Ireland were the normal, natural, (common) -
sensible people in Ireland - all others must be adjudged as in some
degree, abnormal, unnatural; that, because we youngsters were normal,
that is, without a taint of heresy or near-heresy natural or theological,
we were Irish Separatists.
I feel that I may be using the words "normal", "natural",
"commonsense", usque ad nosiam. I can't help it. I will, be measuring
the standards of our Separatist ideas and ideals against our opponents',
and these words are recognised and easily redognisable criteria; they
are, when properly applied, useful and dependable indicators that a
correct solution has been reached, whether it be in physics or
meta-physics; they are invaluable when used as catalysts to bring
about quicker and better results: they short-cut many wearysome
syllogisms for the sympathetic, inquiring, open mind. However, "You
may jump on them if you wish" as Neptune is reported to have said when
he had sharpened the prongs on his trident "it will only improve their
impression."
Let us now try to build up, and present in nutshell form, the
logic of our Separatist philosophy and show that it was based on sound
natural and, therefore, good theological law.
Commonsense, a kindly and helpful fellow-traveller, will be our
guide, judge and gap-filler. Caps, big and small in my logic, may
irritate the sensitive, scientific-trained academic mind, which is
often more concerned about how a case is presented than with the case
itself; but we ordinary folk have neither time nor inclination to
make or to follow detailed, vivisected, distracting syllogisms on the
analysis of how reasoning is presented. Pre-digested, desiccated
soups for the epicure, the blazé, the delicate palate, but solid food
for thought, with its percentage of roughage to aid digestion, is what
7.
we work-a-day healthy minded people recognise and, only, can
appreciate properly.
Therefore, without undue worry about the pedantic accuracy of my
syllogisms or the mechanical order of the sequences of my logic, let me
indicate as reasonably as I can: "The reason for the faith that is in
me."
To start with the dictum: All true faith being in essence spiritual
comes under theological law. My political faith is not only based on
but it is an integral part of religious faith. Theology (God-science),
is the only science exact and complete to the Absolute. It is the only
one worth worrying about, too, because it produces effects that last for
eternity. Without it all else is ephemeral and a waste of precious
time. Theological. law is to the natural law as the woof is to the
wart. But the material that theology deals with goes far above and
beyond (and includes) all human knowledge, science, logic, conception.
No "human"logical sequence will ever span the gap that separates
human science and knowledge from Truth. Faith alone can do it. Faith
alone can intellectually accept It, although It cannot be "defined".
And faith accompanied by good will, commonsense and humble prayer, can
make a child a perfected theologian.
As one such child (I hope!) I make bold to lay down the following
statements as axiomatic and let him, who will, gainsay them.
Every normal person is bound in conscience and commonsense,
theology and nature, to put his own family first in his charity, thena
his own country, then all mankind. No man can truthfully be said to
love all mankind who doesn't love his own country more. No man can
truthfully love his country who doesn't love his family more. Let us
ruminate on these computations once in a while. It is so easy to
8.
forget first principles in the turmoil of the application of
secondary "principles" under the influence of instinct and selfishness
and want of thought, with desolation etc."
Love, in its proper order of precedence, has never yet lessened
a one's love for anything else: "I could not love thee half so much
loved I not honour more."
First things must always be put and kept first. Now, anyone who,
for example, puts another country before his own, and, say, joins an
imperial or other foreign army that is known to have crushed or that
simply dominates other countries or people, that recruit commits, de
jure, a serious sin. Can any Catholic theologian legitimately gainsay
that' That recruit puts another nation before his own country
contrary to theology and nature. He unjustifiably puts himself in the
position, under a false and, therefore, blasphemous oath, of having to
attack all mankind, even his own countrymen struggling for freedom,
even his own family - it has often happened. That man is guilty, de
lure, of a crime against theology against international decency,
against down-trodden man. He is guilty theoretically in the sight of
God whether he injures anyone directly or not. And every time he
fires a lethal weapon be it rifle, mine, cannon, flam-thrower, grenade,
or other missile, he is guilty either de facto or de jute, or both
(according to whether or not his ignorance be crass) of all the direct
and indirect results thereof. He is further guilty, de jure, of the
absolute maximum of deaths and maimings and their attendant evil
consequences, that each such missile is capable of theoretically.
Anything wrong theoretically or theologically or in commonsense
in that statement?
9.
Ignorance may excuse the individual if ignorance be not crass;
but oh Ignorancel, what crimes are committed and tolerated in thy name!
The next question that arises automatically is who is guilty of
the cause of the prevalence of such appalling ignorance of apologetics,
a natural law and human decency among our people at hone and abroad?
It has been estimated that there is now about ten million people in
Britain of Catholic Irish descent, by emigration during the last three
hundred years. Yet there is a total of only four million Catholics in
Britain today; and that includes many English families, French, Italian,
German, Spanish, Portugese, Poles etc. who settled in Britain during
that time. Catholics from the North and West of Ireland who mostly
emigrate to Scotland have stood the test much better. Catholicism has
steadily increased in greater proportion to the rise in population in
Scotland. Even in Scotland a small proportion of our people disgrace
their religion and country by displays of both ignorance and "ignorance':
but there is not so large a falling away from the Faith.
What is the cause of this softening and consequent leakage? Does
not the absence of an intellectually satisfying, character-building
catholic-Catholic education with all the fundamentals taught and
elucidated to suit the mental development of the individual, and coalesced
into a unified completed philosophy of life does not the absence
of such a catholic-Catholic education explain the "softness" in the
make-up of 60% of our emigrants' If knowledge be power then ignorance
must he weakness.
Very little investigation is required to show that our people have
had little or no training in the irrefutable logic, and the universality
of application of Catholic principles. Instead, in our schools, a good
10.
deal of thought, energy, patience and cane is expended (in inverse
ratio to their importance?) to impart a practical knowledge of three
of the "Rs". But the fourth "R", religion, gets little but the law
beaten in with the leather. No appeal to the intellect. The
unfortunate lay teacher has his work cut out by "Exams", and often his
bright pupils (and only his bright pupils) are 'accepted' by a religious
teaching Order which one would expect to be more concerned with the
sub-normal than with the super-normal child.
And does it not prove to demonstration that on the whole, our
people receive little character-forming instruction, or are even trained
to think; trained to detect the difference between catch-cries and
full truth, fiction and fact, and, instead, treated with supressio veri
and completely wrong interpretation of Catholic teaching, that so many
of our people still voluntarily join Freemasonic Imperialist armies to
stamp out God-given freedom the world over?
And will it not astonish future generations to learn that for
nearly 300 years Irishmen who were anxious to shake off foreign yoke,
were hampered ("hamstrung" as the Yanks would say) by the Jansenistic
fulmunations of so many of our religious mentors? These teachers
taught us not to render to rapacious, murdering Ceasars what is their
only due - the business end of lethal weapons. Instead they encouraged
Irishmen to join the British seizers' army, and commandedus voluntarily
to contribute to our own and other peoples' tribulation, because these
Jansenists misconstrued the episode of Our Lord counselling prudence
when the "stater" was handed over to the Tax Collector.
It is notorious that heretics base their errors on the very
passages in scripture that confound them. Every Jewish republican or
militant nationalist who listened to Our Lord's historic reply and
11.
witnessed the discomfiture of the Publicans and Pharisees and the
delicious side-stepping of the British (I mean the Roman) spies, must
be now laughing in eternam at our pseudo-Publicans and Pharisees who
imagine that Our Lord told the Jew. to submit to Ceasar or to pay him
tribute! Oh Trap! where was thy string'
Could any other heretical teaching be more than equally absurd?
Why don't our Jansenists pray for a sense of humour the saving grace of
which is a sense of the ridiculous? Already the rising generation
are asking: "What reason did the Bishops give for condemning you?"
"None. They, just condemned us" "But surely they must have said
something to justify such an appallingly serious matter? They must
have said something; what was it?" "Well, each one of them said:
'The lord knows,' that's all". The children being still very young
thought I said 'The Lord Knows'. But naturally that didn't stop them.
"You'r' codding us Daddy. Bishops would have reasons, and we want to
know them." It was now a case of telling the truth or skilfully
side-stepping it, or perhaps scandallising youngsters who believe that
all our clergy are like Ceasar's wife So I said "Jansenism",
followed by suggesting charitable possible explanations that left their
young minds utterly perplexed, and, using modern Yankese they declared,
"That doesn't make senses" The only reply I could make was: "There
is no gumption in heresy and nothing In all nature so blind; and good
men, even good Bishops (and our Bishops were all holy men) can develop
a blind spot through an overdose of "the lord knows".
There is no intelligible explanation of the majority of our
clergy's attitude to Irish Separatists in theology except Jansenism, or
in natural law except the creed of the Janisary, or in logic except
woman's (?) logic: "It is so because it is so".
12.
Heresy being a piece cut out of Faith, and Faith being a gratuitous
gift of God, reason, even the closest human reasoning, cannot percolate
through the opacity of heresy. Heretics may be as sound as a bell in
everything else, but their monomaniacal heresy cannot be exorcised
except by a spiritual miracle, and spiritual miracles require an
apostolate, prayer and even penance on the part of the Faith-full.
In order to remove at once any misunderstanding between my attitude
to Jansenism and my absolute allegiance to the Catholic Church let me
make a confession of Faith with, briefly, some of the reason, for "the
Faith that is in me."
I believe and confess that the teaching of the Catholic Church
(her philosophy) covers, unifies, explains and directs every phase of
every action, thought, word and thing, in human affairs and conduct.
However, Catholic apologetics is a deep study requiring quiet reflection
or rumination, the exercise of commonsense and intelligibly intelligent
direction of each individualand
association.As Catholic philosophy deals,
too, with divine mysteries it is clearly in keeping with commonsense to
expect these mysteries to be above commonsense But a commonsense
corollary is: No true Divine mystery, law or ordinance can be contrary
to commensense and will not perplex the understanding that is animated
by good will. The Church stands by that dictum. She stands or falls
by it. And that stand taken in conjunction with her unique claim
(going back unbroken to the First Book of Genesis) to be God's one and
only oracle on earth is proof positive, and also by elimination, that
she is the one true Church - Cod's Oracle. Therefore, when "she opes
her mouth
But when Heresy speaks it is not She.
To conclude my profession of faith: I acknowledge the divine
authority of the Ten Commandmentsbecause the Church demands it -
13.
they are also sound natural law for intelligent beings. I accept
the Six Precepts of the Church because She is His only Oracle: and
I acknowledge her authority behind every dogma She promulgates
ex-Cathedra, and for the same reason. I recognise as the Vicar of
Christ the successors of St. Peter to the See of Rome because theS
Church has always acknowledged it so, and because commonsense
dictates that a hydraheaded Church of the One God would be a monstrosity.
and there is no other claimant to such authority. I accept the
discipline of Rome and, from Rome, of the Bisho and clergy: but
I'm not bound to believe in its efficacy; nor am I always bound to
accept as morally binding the application of just any interpretation
of any particular Article or particle of the Church's teaching or
discipline by any particular member of the clergy, when such
interpretation is contrary to commonsense or natural law and, therefore,
not the universal teaching of the Church. To say otherwise would be
a denial of the inalienable right and duty of man (homo sapiens) to
have "reason for the faith that is in him". Catholic philosophy is
not a fetisM If it were we would all be simple 'saps" to be
bothered with it. Finally it is nw absolute conviction and belief
that if the Catholic Church is not our only infallibile guide, then
it could only be because there is no God. And if there be no God
then this world and this life would be an inane, nstifying and cruel
hoax It is entirely opposed to an intelligent view of the fitness
of things to think that the marvellous wonders of this visible and
invisible creation with its panoramic complex multiplicity
(in-finity' - to us finites) of perfectly harmonised immutable laws -
laws made to co-.o',erate and co-ordinate in perfect unison in the
production and reproduction of inevitable results, ad infinituma
rperpetual motion all round us, yet no nan has yet discovered it) that
this astounding creation, and most astounding of all - human
14.
intellect, self-realisation, free will and sensibility, that all
this just happened by accident or by some kind of auto-uggestion was
self-created, is an Insult to reason, ignores commonsense and
outrages generous human instinct.
No one, no thing, no mere fortuitous chance could possibly have
brought into being such an intricate and continuous positivity,
governed by such an in-finity of laws, forces and results (results so
inevitable as to be calculable if we had the brains to know how)
except anor Infinite Mind and It good.
If it can ever be proved to my intellectual satisfaction that what
the Church teaches, ex-athedra, or what she claims to be is wrong there
will be only three reasonable alternatives left to me, or to any
homo saniens:
(1) leave the Church and turn athiest.
(2) (Better still') Consult a psychiatrist.
(3) (Best') Suicide: to forestall the horrors of having
to live under inevitable Jungle Law.
Luckily, that is providentially, the latter two alternatives are
dependent on the first one, which I deliberately declare can never
arise, because I know, and it has been known to countless millions down
through the ages by and from the cream of human intelligence right
down through every strata of society to the innocent child that as
sure as life there is a the King of Kings and that The Catholic
Church is His only Kingdom on earth of which Peter received the Keys.
Perhaps I have shown enough "reason for the faith that is in me."
Now for the application of my Catholic philosophy. There are
innumerable facets and aspects to the application of Catholic
philosophy. To cover the whole ground fully a million years with the
15.
greatest human intellect working full time would not be enough,
because it covers so much: every viewpoint, both positive and
negative, of every thought, word, deed, thing and omission of every
human being and of each and every kind of association of people in
every generation until the end of this world. The Catholic Religion
is catholic in every respect.
I will be satisfied if I can show that Soloheadbeg ambush and
the Tan War and the Civil War were carried out on our part not only
in good faith but as an incumbent duty, and if I can show that the
opposition to us on religious grounds as voiced by the majority of
the Hierarchy was based on Jansenistic-Gallicanism, and if besides
that I help to clarify some historical facts then may the Lord
dismiss his poor servant.
16.
Chanter 2.
This question is often asked: How, when and on whose authority
did the hostilities begin after The "how" and the "when"
would be coincidental. To take the last first: "On whose
responsibility or initiative did fighting begin?" I would say that
it was the leaders of the 1916 Rising by their heroic deaths after an
historic fight that left us survivors (and all who were imbued with the
Fenian ideal) no honourable alternative but the slogan: 'They shall
not have fought and died in vain'. I'm afraid that our motives
became a little untheological: "Vengeance be " (as Paideen O'Keeffe
emphatically declared once to British journa1ists) I would say
deliberately that nowhere - in campe or gaols - did anyone ever suggest
how or when "a beginning must be made': it would have been foolish.
No prisoner or internee knew what the conditions were like outside nor
how they would develop. I have no firsthand knowledge of what took
place in the convict prisons nor in Frongoch after my two or three weeks
there when I was picked out. with S. T. O'Kelly, Walter Cole, N.W.O'Reilly,
Tom Craven and Darrell Figgis and sent to Reading Gaol, because I was
blamed for starting a strike against road-making in the Camp "unless
we get Trades Union wages"(!) We didn't get Trades Union wages: they
didn't get the roads and I was 'paid off' by being sent to Reading Gaol.
In Reading Gaol with Arthur Griffith, Sean T. O'Kefly, Herbert
More-Pimm, Darrell Figgis, George Nicholls, Seán Milroy, Ernest Blythe,
Cathal O'Shannon and others, all leaders in Sinn Féin, it was only
natural that the revival of Sinn Féin was 'Operation No. 1' with them.
Most of these men (Seán T. O'Kelly certainly excepted) had their own
good sound reasons for thinking that a united passive resistance policy
was all-sufficient to win our independence. We younger men had a
tremendous regard for the intelligence, clearsightedness, integrity and
17.
zeal of these eminent men. And commonsense told us Volunteers
that without a strong, vigorous, vociferous political Party the Army
would be swamped by pro-British partisan propaganda of press and
pulpit. Also, we could see the usefulness, the importance, the
necessity of the moral-legal support of an elected Government
the 'Constituent Assembly' of Arthur Griffith's talks to us. We were
sensible to the necessity of having the will of the people behind the
coming struggle. The Volunteer Officers in Reading (men like
Terence McSweeney, Tomás McCurtain, J.J. O'Connell, Eamonn O'Duibhir,
Joe Robinson, Seumas Reader, Mick Brennan, Padraig O'Maille) were
enthusiastically in favour of the political movement as the nation's
second arm for what it was worth, and it was equally with the
army of vital importance to the success of a revolution.
After the releases from internment in December, 1916, the
Volunteers saw that the political movement had such immense support
from the people as a whole that it soon was unnecessary for the
Volunteers to waste their time on it.
Sinn Féin became the cloak for Volunteer meetings: the first
Volunteer Convention after 1916 was held under cover of a Sinn Péin
Convention held on the 26th (7) October, 1917. Wet of us who were
present at the Volunteer Convention were delegates to both Conventions.
At that Convention there was not a mention of the renewal of
hostilities. My estimate of the number at the Convention would be
between 300 and 400, but they represented only the units then
existing:- Companies. No wonder there would be no thought of opening
hostilities. It was at a later meeting of Brigade officers that the
first hypothetical plan was mooted. Hypothetical because it was
conditional on possible British action: wholesale arrests or
18.
conscription. If fighting broke out anywhere it was up to the
Volunteers everywhere to strike at everything and anything, cut
communications and disrupt British movements. There was no suggestion
of the Volunteers taking the initiative.
The I.R.B. had lost prestige after Easter Week 1916, their
authority moribund where not already dead. Many had, apparently,
shirked the Rising. There had been some movement started in Frongoch
which aimed at reviving and getting a change in control of the I.R.B.
Shortly after the releases from internment young chaps mixed among us
broadcasting the news that every member of the 'Organisation' was
requested to attend a meeting in Parnell Square - No. 44 I think. At
that meeting I saw young fellows with notebooks rushing round and about
the ground floor (there were about 150 present) button-holing individuals
with anxious whispers - "We must make sure that no one will be elected
an officer of the Volunteers who is not a member of the 'Organisation'" -
as if that were something new or something that we would be allowed to
forget, and without adverting to the fact that that sort of thing would
undermine the authority and efficiency of the whole Volunteer movement.
Without waiting for the meeting to start officially I walked out in
disgust thinking of Tamanny Hall. I never again bothered about the
I.R.B.
After the election of the Volunteer Executive in October 1917,
whatever authority the I.R.B. retained became reduntant and illegal for
the Volunteers. After the first meeting of the First Dáil it had only
a nuisance 'value' to the whole movement.
After the Oath of Allegiance to the Dáil the I.R.B. became a
sinister cabal. The Volunteer Executive had full power for peace or war
until the First Dáil met and or when the Volunteers took the Oath of
Allegiance to the Dáil.
19.
From October, 1917 to January 21st, 1919, the Executive of the
Volunteers determined policy; G.H.Q. carried it out; and from
October, 1917 orianisation of the Volunteers for an armed struggle
was the only possible policy. Neither the Dáil nor G.H.Q. could or
would declare war; it was also unnecessary.
The Dáil declared that the war was still on from 1172. It was
clearly and cleverly hut clandestinely left to circumstances to reopen
active armed opposition.
The passive resistence policy of old Sinn Féin and the apparent
Policy of the Dáil, was not the policy of G.H.Q.: "Oglach" 14th
October, l9l8, three months before the First Dáil met, stated:
"passive resistence is no resistence at all. Our active military
resistence is the only thing that will tell. Any plans, theories, or
doubts tending to distract the minds of the people from the policy of
fierce, ruthless fighting ought to be severely discouraged."
Inference: Ruthless fighting encouraged.
That attitude of G.H.Q. was not either condemned or altered by the
Dáil which, on the 21st January, 1919, the same date and about the same
hour that Soloheadbeg ambush took place, declared to the nations of the
world: "The existing state of war between Ireland and England can
never be ended unless Ireland is completely evacuated by the armed
forces of England": a declaration of war - in existence.
This brings me to the Soloheadbeg Ambush, and "The Ethics of
Soloheadbeg".
The Ethics of Soloheadbeg Ambush
My reasons for concentrating first on the ethics of Soloheadbeg
Ambush Are:
(1) What I have just said has a bearing on the case pro and
shows at least that there were no legal grounds on which it could be
20.
condemned, though one could imagine "Timidity" querying: "Prudence?"
And prudence was the only moral consideration.
(2) Because no one else is in a position or has the right to state
the case, for I was the Brigade O/C. in charge and took responsibility.
(3) A controversy in The Irish Tines in February, 1950 illustrates
the widespread lack of equity in judgment on this matter. For some
weeks this controversy was carried on in The Irish Tines on 'The Ethics
of Soloheadbeg'. When I considered all had had their say, I wrote the
Editor the attached letter with a covering letter stating my authority
to speak on the subject and explaining why I could not write under my
own name being a member of the Bureau of Military History. I
wrote under the nom-de-guerre 'Dalariada' because of my association with
Antrim-Down and Scotland, the ancient Dalariada. (See attached letter
to Editor, Irish Times, 6/2/50).
Seeappendix No Xii
No further letters appeared on "The Ethics of Soloheadbeg".
When the news of the ambush reached the city there were some
violent condemnations. Arthur Griffith said something like: if that
sort of thing were allowed to continue we would soon be eating one
another. Arthur Griffith was possibly (to him probably) expecting the
suppression of the Dáil would follow, and his life's work thrown back
a quarter of a century. Others too were equally shocked, the clergy
in particular or those of them who were unconsciously (I hope)
influenced by Maynooth Jansenism or Gallicanism and or had blood
relationship with the British Forces, especially the R.I.C. - those Irish
Janissaries. All these could voice their opinion or prejudice with
impunity. No one, not even St. Joan d'Arc (who should be recognised
as the patron and exemplar of all peoples struggling against pagan
imperialism) would have been allowed to voice or publish anything that
21.
even savoitred of suggesting even the simple possibility of a possible
doubt based on a plea of not even knowing what the other side had to say,
and knowing that what the other side had to say had been and would be
suppressed.
Now, I could never understand why people, otherwise sensible, could
say that clergy should not interfere in politics. Who has a better
right? They have the natural right of the citizen and their training
should fit them eminently to speak on politics: politics - which should
be regarded as next to the priesthood in importance to the social and
moral well being of the whole community. It is our difficulty, and
more especially theirs, to discriminate between their "divinity" and
their natural self-opinion. And is it not true that most aevines are
not expert on military tactics' that they, any more than an ordinary
citizen, could not know whether a revolution would be a success ora
failure' - which is the only moral ground on which an otherwise
justifiable revolution may be assessed or judged. Our clergy have the
right to advise us on human affairs and to condemn only what is
inherently wrong. To condemn, as priests, something which is inherently
holy (subject only to prudence) because they think it foolish, is
foolishness itself. May I interpolate here as a (first?) principle;
To struggle for freedom is surely inherently a holy thing; it is more,
it is every citizen's duty: Not a wholly unwholesome thought?
How Soloheadbeg Ambush cane about?
The only man with whom I discussed fully the plan of campaign was
Seán, Treacy. Tracy was My ViceCommandant. He cane to me in
Kilshenane with his fiancée, May Quigley,shortly
after Christmas l9l8.
After tea the two of us went out to the haggard where he told me of the
gelignite that was due to arrive at Soloheadbeg quarry in two or three
22.
weeks time - he could not find out the exact date, which was kept
under sealed orders. He wanted to know should we capture it. When
I looked surprised that anyone should ask for such an obvious answer
he added that there would be from two to six R.I.C. guarding the cart,
that they would be armed and that there was the possibility of shooting.
"Good", said I, "Go ahead, but under the condition that you let me
know in time to be there myself with a couple of men from the local
Battalion" men with whomI would go tiger hunting. Then Seán
Treacy said "Will you get permission from G.H.Q.?" I looked
inquiringly at Seán to see if he were serious, before I replied "It will
be unnecessary so long as we do not ask for their permission. If we ask
we must await their reply." Transport was slow in those early days
and it might take so long that the gelignite could easily arrive before
permission was received. "Who will take responsibility?" he queried.
I said "I will". I have seldom seen anyone look so pleasantly
relieved. When Seán was suddenly pleased with anything his quizzical
eyes opened for a flash and the tip of his tongue licked the outside
corner of his lips.
This was to be the first Brigade operation. The Brigade had been
formed just three months before (October 1918) at a convention held in
Tipperary town and presided over by the Chief of Staff, Richard Mulcahy,
while Eamon Ó Duibhir and I were both in gaol in Belfast for drilling.
I had been invited to go to Tipperary by Eamon Ó Duibher while we
were in Reading Gaol, to help reorganise the Volunteers if and
when we were released. I had accepted gladly because I had taken a
solemn resolution on Easter Monday morning, when we were sure the Rising
was definitely on, that I'd soldier for the rest of my life or until we
had our freedom. During that week I realised the foolishness of being
23.
a target for overwhelniing British forces. I saw what casualties
could be inflicted by snirere and that the British were not averse to
using any weapon against us: they burned us out. It became abundantly
clear to me that we could hope to survive and win only if we were a
ghostly army of sharpshooters operating an over the country combining
to deal with smal1 bodies of the enemy and making Ireland too costly
to hold; always chosing our own ground, and our own targets, and always
avoiding any move initiated by the British unless we had inside
information and could surprise them, which would be tantamount to chosing
our own ground. Succintly: make the King's writ run in Ireland.
I think I can state (tho' it might be perhaps better to say
'postulate') that Soloheadbeg was the accidental starting point of what
became known later as 'The Tan Wart'.
I.O. page 57: "The beginning of the year (1919) was marked by the
murder of two constables by masked men and armed. This was the
beginning of the state of things that has led to the terrorism of the
whole countryside. The terrorists are young men many of them tools of
designing criminals"."This was the first murder of R.I.C. since 1916".
I have said 'accidental' (l)
because 'providential' might sound a bit presumptious, tho' in point of
fact there is no such thing as an accident not known beforehand to, and
not allowed by Providence; and (2) because Volunteers all over the
country were as prepared, as anxious and as wiling as we to see the
ball started rolling and would have started it in similar circumstances;
and we certainly would not have been able to carry on if the Army and
the country were not prepared to help us.
There had, of course, been a number of shootings from 1917 in
Dublin, Kerry, Cork, Mayo, Clan and in Tipperary itself, but there was
no 'follow through'. Soloheadbeg was the first time that Volunteer
Officers known to the R.I.C. had decided to take action (in this case
the capture of arms and explosives) and shooting to dill, if necessary,
24.
and it was necessary, and then standing their ground. The rescue of
Seán Hogan at Knocklong was the 'follow thro'' of Soloheadbeg. We
realised the possible consequences to us, and the probable consequences
to us if the Army were not prepared to stand behind us. We did not rush
in without thought of the consequences to the about-to-be-set-up
Government and the Movement as a whole. I thought long, deeply and
anxiously and I almost panicked when I saw the date of the Dáil meeting
drawing near and no sign of the gelignite coming. I was most anxious not
to compromise the Dáil by starting anything that might be tagged on to
them. If we had the ball rolling before the existence of the Dáil had
been fully promulgated the British authorities would be pleased to think
that Soloheadbeg was the action of irresponsibles and the Dái1 would be
saved by righteous indignation speeches of dyed-in-the-wood pacifist
members I knew that our Gallican clergy would help unconsciously in the
delusion that we were pariahs. After the ambush I was most anxious to
see how the Dáil had reacted, but Seán Treacy flashed the tip of his tongue
to the corner of his mouth, rubbed his hands and gave vent to one of his
pet idiosyncrasies with: "What will the Bishops say" So anxious was I
about the legalities that I had given strict orders that no despatches
and no papers were to be brought to me on the 21st, nor until after the
gelignite had arrived. Luckily (is there such a thing as luck?) the
cart arrived on the 21st and about at the same time as the Dáil met.
With regard to the actual ambush itself: for several reasons there
would be little or no use in describing the action in full detail. To
begin with it was a very small affair compared to later developments. Its
merit consisted almost solely in the fact that it was the "premier coup",
and "it is the first step that counts" as the French say. Again, modem
warfare has so completely changed that there is no similarity, no
worthwhile tactical lesson to be gained for future use from almost any of
25.
our engagements; and, also, Soloheadbeg has been dealt with already by
several participants. However, none of these has mentioned (perhaps
they have forgotten) some general instructions which, as O/C., I felt
should be issued. These instructions have a bearing on the ethics of the
ambush. It was laid down as an order that if only two R.I.C. should
accompany the cart they were to be challenged, but if there were six of
them they were to be met with a volley as the cart reached the gate.
The reason for the difference was that there would be so little danger to
us if only two appeared that it would be inhuman not to give them an
opportunity of surrendering, but if six police turned up they, with their
rifles, would be too great a danger to the eight of us to take any such
risk as to challenge them and thus hand over our initiative. We had only
one Winchester Repeater rifle and an agglomeration of small-arms.
On the morning of the 21st January, 1919, Sean Treacy's agents
reported that the gelignite would be removed that day. Captain Paddy
O'Dwyer was posted about a mile away with his bicycle on the road to
Tipperary town ready to speed ahead of the cart the moment he saw it in
the distance.
Naturally we had already discussed the plan of attack. I had
encouraged everyone to give his views in order to size-up his ingenuity,
commonsense and judgment. The final consensus of their opinion was that
we should lie concealed on either side of the gate, rush out with a yell,
overawe and overwhelm them the moment the cart reached the gate. In
summing up I suggested that I thought that that would resemble gorrilla
warfare rather than guerilla tactics, that it would betray an unsoldierly
lack of discipline and self-control, and would create a false impression
of headstrong, headlong hardihood. Then there was the danger of men
keyed up with excitement not knowing when to shoot, (orders would not be
heard above the din), triggers would be pulled instead of pressed to the
26.
grave danger of our own men bunched together and milling around.
Then it was suggested that we spread along the hedge with two to do
the rushing out at the gate, the rest to cover off the retreat and the
advance of the R.T.C. But they all wanted to be one of the two at
the gate which warmed my heart because I could see that those
"cocks" would fight tho' not one of them had been in a fight tinier fire
before. I insisted that no one should risk life or limb, that all
were to remain behind the hedge tho' only two police were reported
coming. Sáen Treacy and Dan Breen, at the last exciting moment, started
to insist that they should be allowed to rush out. Breen seemed to have
lost control of himself declaring with grinding teeth and a very high-
pitched excited voice that he'd go out and face them. I gave an upward
nod of my head which meant "cui bono", but I made a mental note that that
man should never be put in charge of a fight. I did not want any
Balaclava-like heroics, which, as the French Military Attaché declared,
"is not war".
I had already asked Treacy to remain behind the hedge at the left
of the gate where there was a very convenient arm-rest. Treacy had a
small-calibre Winchester repeating rifle; and a rifle is comparatively
cumbersome in a hold-up unless firing from an arm-rest. The hotheaded
tension of Breen made it even more vitally important that Treacy should
be collected and cool in order to be able to deal with any emergency.
One could depend on cool riflemen. Small arms in the hands of men in
their first fight, no matter how cool those men may be, are almost
useless at a range of more than two yards. There was nothing for it
hut to walk over to Seán and say quietly: "Seán you must take that asa
an order". Seán grimmaced and with a little shrug of one shoulder got
down on one knee and cocked his rifle 'at the ready'. The rumbling
of the cart was drawing neat; I walked quickly the five or six yards
27.
to the left where Paddy Dwyer was waiting for me. Our job was to
spring over the hedge the moment the challenge 'hands up' was given, and
seize the horse while the R.I.C. were covered. A few yards farther
back the R.I.C. had unslung their carbines, but it was clearly just
routine. Still, it meant they were ready. The R.I.C. were behind the
cart, and, as they appeared opposite the gate, the high-pitched challenge
"Hands Up" rang out. Before the first sound had time to re-echoDwyer
and I were over the ditch and grabbing the reins. The R.I.C. seemed to
be at first amused at the eight of Dan Breen's burly figure with nose and
mouth covered with a handkerchief; but with a sweeping glance they saw
his revolver and Dwyer and me they could see only three of us.
In a flash their rifles were brought up, the bolts worked and triggers
pressed two shots rang out, but not from the carbines: the cut-off
had been overlooked: The two shots came from Treacy and Tim Crowe.
Those shots were the signal for general firing. At the inquest the fatal
wounds were "caused by small-calibre bullets".
WhenPaddyDwyer and I landed on the road the horse took fright.
I had only my left hand free to catch the reins and when the shots rang
out it became frantic; it reared up on its hind legs and tried to break
away; the reins slipped about two feet thro' my hand, but I recovered
my grip near the bit when the horse's feet reached the ground again.
Paddy Dwyer took charge of him and had him under control at once.
Seán Treacy remained near his post until I went in thro' the gate. He
was jubilant and danced around, he kissed his rifle and said "That was a
comfortable place to fire from."
Seán, Treacy had made all the arrangements for dumping of the
gelignite. Dan Breen and Seán Hogan mounted the cart. Breen, standing
up with the reins, whipped the horse and away they went clattering on the
rough road. I had thought that Dan Breen, who had worked on the
28.
railway, would have known the danger of jolting geliiite that was
frozen the weather was very cold. Hogan told me afterwards that
he tried to caution Dan but either Dan couldn't hear him or he put no
"seem" in it. The cart had been brought from the town dead slow with
the driver leading the horse by the head.
It was Tom Carew who hid the gelignite so well that it was never
discovered tho' every inch of round was searched and poked for miles
around including the place where it was hidden. I was unknown in the
district and I remained behind until all had cleared out.
It had been arranged beforehand that Treacy, Breen and Hogan
should meet and go 'on the run' to Mrs. Tobin's of Tincurry. I went
to Kilshenane to fix up contacts and to find out what the reactions
were• Mrs. Cussin, Eamon O'Dwyer's sister, was very perturbed; she
asked me: "Seumas, how will you go to Confession and "
"Mrs. Cussin" said I, "when I go to Confession I go to confess my sins
not to boast of my virtues!" "Oh, that's all right then" she said,
brightening up, and proceeded with her preparations for a great feed
which was the first I had had for nearly a week.
I had no intention of staying in Kilshenane, even that night;
The R.I.C. knew that I was the O/C. of the Brigade from the
previous April - eight months - because they always called on me (tho'I was supposed to be only a farmhand on Eamon Ui Duibhir's place)whenever anything of a military nature occurred in the district as when
Jimmy Leahy, O/C. Mid. Tipp. Brigade and some of his men coming from an
aeireacht, broke some pillar-boxes in Dundrum, the R.I.C. visitedme
first. Jimmy Brown and I were in the garden. I picked up a fork as
I went to meet them followed by Jimmy Brown. The Sergeant was
indignant that I picked up the fork. He asked me why. I told him thatI wasn't going to be arrested alive again. He said they were not there
to arrest me; there had been some damage done to pillar-boxes in Dundrumand H.Q. (R.I.C.) had to have a report on my comments. "Why to me?"
"Well, to whom else would we come?"
so I asked Jimmy Brown, a Volunteer who worked there, to brush the mud
off my trousers which I had to change. I left as soon as I could
29.
and Jimmy promised to do the needful. I had warned him that the police
would be along any moment. Jimmy didn't get time to do the brushing
during that exciting day; it was about 12 midnight when he started to
clean the trousers After about ten minutes he turned them inside-out,
as "half the mud of the Soloheadbeg quarry must have been on them."
He threw the trousers over the end of his bed and started to undress.
Jimmy hadn't time to get into bed when the police arrived looking
for me. Jack Cussin, Eamon's brother-in-law, was in bed but he got up
and dressed quickly before the police got in. Finding his bed warm they
concluded that I had just escaped. They searched every corner, nook and
cranny for any tell-tale evidence, but none was found. Jimmy Brown told
me afterwards with chuckles how the R.I.C. pitched the trousers from one
place to another as it got in the way of their search. Those trousers
were new and looked very innocent with the clean inside out.
Two days later Tuck Davoren accompanied me to Glenough where I met
the O'Keeffes PaddyDwyer and also Paddy Kinane and a number of Mid
Tipperary Volunteers who brought me to where Theacy, Hogan and Breen were.
Almost as I walked in the door Seán Treacy, who was in touch with
Maurice Crowe, Brigade Adjutant, handed me, with his whimsical smile, a
despatch from G.H.Q. calling me to Dublin. Next morning Seán and I
set off on bicycles for the city, leaving Dan Breen and Sáen Hogan behind.
We stopped at O'Farrells in Carlow: Seán seemed to be known and liked
everywhere. Next morning we set off again for the city. On arrival
in Dublin word was sent to G.H.Q., and almost immediately we had a
despatch telling us where we were to meet Michael Collins. But Michael
was waiting for us on the street with his note book out. This meeting
which was in the street instead of in an office was the first indication
we had that if we ('the big Four?) were not exactly personna non-grata,
at best we were decidedly not warmly welcome in any H.Q. office,
30.
except in Peadar Clancy's shot in Talbot Street where we were always
received hilariously. They were rightly afraid of our blazing trail
being followed by spies.
Mick seemed to be keeping his eyes peeled watching everyone in the
street without moving his head. His glance would come back to us.
He greeted us with: "Well, everything is fixed-up; be ready to go in
a day or two". "To go where?" I asked'. "To the States" he said.
"Why". "Well, isn't it the usual thing to do after " "We
don't want to go to the States or anywhere else". "Well", said Mick
"a great many people seem to think it is the only thing to do". I began
to be afraid that G.H.Q. had begun to give way to Sinn Féin pacifism,
and with a little acerbity I said: "Look here, to kill a couple of
policemen for the country's sake and leave it at that by running away
would be so wanton as to approximate too closely to murder." "Then
what do you propose to do" "right it out of course".
Mick Collins, without having shown the slightest emotion during
this short interview, now suddenly closed his notebook with a snap
saying as he strode off with the faintest of faint smiles on his lips
but with a big laugh in his eyes: "That's all right with me".
Seán, stood deep in thought without looking round after Nick: he
had expected an enthusiastic welcome. I touched Seán on the shoulder
and said: "Come on Seán, that's great!" "What's great" "Well, I
expected only tacit recognition. G.H.Q. naturally want to sit
comfortably in their armchairs organising until they can see the
daylight ahead. If we can blaze the trail they will then encourage the
rest of the country to do the same". "They'll repudiate us if we get
caught, I'm thinking". "WhoCares' I'm sure you don't Dead: we will
still be Interested tho' from very far off. But I'll be hanged
if I'll be caught alive" I think my pun put Seán into good humour
31.
again; but he was unusually silent on the way down to Tipp.
Dan Breen was angry when he heard the news Young Hogan, only,
seemed to appreciate correctly the position of G.H.Q. Seán Treacy
had the mate refinement of most lads brought up in the country and
seldom looked one straight in the eyes when being spoken to. Seán
didn't see the laugh in Mick Collins' eyes and that, coupled with Mick's
abruptness (despite his "That's all right with me") made him stun think
that G.H.Q. regarded us as at best a nuisance.
Sáen Treacy had a genius for organisation and making friends. We
were kept busy going round the brigade area contacting officers and trying
to get things going. We were being searched for daily. From two to
five thousand soldiers would concentrate on an area, search every house
and field rounding up all the male population of military age and
always we were just outside one of the apices of the triangle, with field
glasses enjoying the sight. We had to get men in every Company area to
be ready to scout for us, and to do it armed and be prepared to join us
if attacked. Soon we began to be envied, the men wanting to be with us
all the time. The Volunteers were told to go 'on the run' rather than
lose liberty or their arms, and to be ready to fight for both. As these
men increased in numbers they were banded together into what we called
"Active Service Groups". When I reported this to G.H.Q. they adopted
the idea but gave them the better name of "Active Service Units".
Columns were the next step suggested by G.H.Q.
I was not enamoured of the idea of large Columns. To me they
seemed to approximate too closely to a small standing Any which was
objectionable from several points of view. (l) They were a permanent
large body and therefore too easily located and the loss of a Column
would have meant almost completely disarming the Brigade. They
required even available rifle.
(2).
They required too many Volunteers as
extra guards and despatch carriers, most of whomwere neededtoat home
keep the
32.
home-fires burning and the pot boiling for us as well as for themselves.
Big Columns used eat, almost out of house and home, a whole townland;
and, compared to the usefulness-beyond the nuisance 'value' to the
enemy-of their military actions during long periods, their upkeep was
rather costly. (3). There was the danger of the slow-moving Britisha
wakening-up to the one counter action that I feared: organising ten
Columns to our one. It was putting the idea into their heads. In fact
it was in our Brigade area that they first experimented with a large
Flying Column. Captain and two Lieutenants set out with 100
N.C.Os. and men from Templemore across country to the borders of South
Tipperary at Boherlahan. They arrived fairly late in the day and
immediately camped on both sides of the bridge across the Suir. They
had not been reported, they had travelled so secretly, and in their camp
they were well concealed. They left the bridge clear. No one was
challenged from the side he started from (he could see nothing) but when
he reached the other side he was challenged and held up. From a
distance no one could see a soldier. They were highly trained and knew
their business! About 5 a.m. next morning a Volunteer on horseback
crossed the bridge and was held up and searched. Nothing found they
didn't release him, probably because they had nothing to interest them
Up to this so the rider was held till the officers came. They probably
had become a little bit suspicious of the Volunteer for they searched
him more thoroughly again and found nothing until one of the soldiers
noticed something on the sole of a boot. They prised open the sole and
discovered a despatch. But what a despatch There can be little
doubt that the Captain had been well warned about our wonderful
Intelligence system. He was so careful to play safe that he didn't let
his Lieutenants know where he intended to go until they were ready to
march each morning when each Lieutenant got his marching orders for the
day. They had taken three days to come to our borders. The Captain
kept his intended itinerary to himself concealed in a diary which he
33.
kept in a pocket inside hs tunic. When he read the despatch that poor
(aptain was not only mystified, he panicked for he left at once on a
forced march to Clonmel. Why' Because of what he saw in the captured
despatch. He read: "To O/C.Capt,and two Lts. With 100 N.C.Os and
men set out from Templemore on the morning of He encamped at
Next morning the Column left under sealed orders and arrived at
They are now camped on the south side of the Suir at Boherlahan holding
both bridgeheads, concealed. They have seen no I.R.A." This was
splendid intelligence work surely by an invisible enemy. They had not
only noted his every movement but had got his name (and who knows perhaps
the names and addresses of them all). This was disconcerting enough
but when he read further his hair must have stood on end: "He intends
to go from here to, then to and right tothe end
of his secret itinerary. It was too much for the poor Captain.
Clever ordinary military intelligence is bad enough to have to contend
with (and he had seen for himself how perfect our intelligence was) but
this clairvoyance was diabolical; the utterly impossible was not
impossible to the I.R.A. Intelligence
Whence came that despatch? The simple answer is Mrs. de Vere Hunt.
Mrs. Hunt was a very tall stately and cultured lady. A non-catholic she
was suspected by the locals to be anti-national. Some months earlier a
Mid-Tipperary officer, Jimmy Leahy, approached me and requested me to
let then 'remove' the Hunts to get the land for division. The reason
advanced being that the land had been sequestered some long time ago.
To add a little weight to the request he added that the Hunts were a
danger because of their political views. He agreed that they had done
nothing yet to justify deporting them but he thought prevention was better
than cure. I told Jimmy that that would be very far removed from the
spirit of the Volunteers who should try to win these people rather than
alienate them. To make sure that the Hunts would not come to aw harm
34.
I went to the local Battalion O/C. to warn him of the need to see that
the Hunts were not interfered with; he, Tadgh Dwyer, smilingly said:
"Let them think she is against us it will make her place all the safer
from the British. I have already warned these fellows off. The house
is being watched. It is one of the most comfortable places in the whole
Brigade area. Always we are welcome.'
The capture of that despatch was the luckiest thing that could have
happened to us No 'flying column' was ever tried in South Tipperary
again. In some of our border areasthe British occasionally used to
send out a Column based on a strong point (or between two strong posts)
to which they could retire within twelve or fourteen hours. The real
flying column seems to have been tried with a little more success in
Cork where the I.R.A. Columns had their own near miraculous escapes.
Mrs. Hunt told me afterwards that she approached the Captain and
bade them "welcome in these dreadful days". It was a pleasure to meet
and see them around and would he and his Lieutenants have dinner with
her. He agreed with alacrity. Mrs. Hunt gave her maid the evening
off "because maids are dangerous to have around at times like this, they
talk so much!" she told the officers. This gave her the excuse to do
the serving herself. They enjoyed the meal and when it was over the
Captain dismissed his two Lieutenants and settled down to peruse his
diary while Mrs. Hunt busied herself clearing the table and chatting,
keeping on the move. The Captain's back was mostly towards her. She
is a very tall lady and her sight must have been astonishingly keen and
she must have had a photographic memory, for, as he turned the leaves
slowly she managed to steal a glance at each and memorised the gist of
it. She had the despatch ready in no time and had it sent to the local
officer. The rest of the story is already told.
By February, 1919, the R.I.C. were very bitter because none of us
had been captured and I got reports of torture to civilians, including
35.
Hogan's and Breen's relatives, and the British Government imposed
martial law on Tipperary prohibiting fairs and markets. There was
nothing for it but to hit back and I produced the following draft
proclamation and sent it to G.H.Q. for approval:-
Quoted in Red Terror and Green" by Richard Dawson (John Murray) p.240.
PROCLAMATION.
Whereas a foreign and tyrannical Government is preventing
Irishmen exercising the civil right of buying and selling in their own
markets in their own country, and
Whereas almost every Irishman who has suffered the death penalty
for Ireland was sentenced to death solely on the strength of the
evidence and retorts of policemen who, therefor, are dangerous spies,
and
Whereas thousands of Irishmen have been deported and sentenced
solely on the evidence of these same hierlings, assassins and traiterous
spies the police, and
Whereas the life, limb and living of no citizen of Ireland is safe
while these paid spies are allowed to infest the country, and
Whereas it has come to our knowledge that some men and boys have
been arrested and drugged, and
Whereas there are a few Irishmen who have sunk to such depths of
degredation that they are prepared to give information about their
neighbours and fellow countrymen to the police, and
Whereas all these evils will continue as long as the people permit:
We hereby proclame the South Riding of Tipperary a military area
with the following regulations:
(a) A policeman found within the said area on and after the
day of February 1919, will be deemed to have forfeited his life. The
more notorious police being dealt with, as far as possible, first.
36.
(b) On and after the day of February 1919, every person in
the pay of England (magistrates, jurors etc.) who helps England to rule
this country or who assists in any way the upholders of foreign
Government in this South Riding of Tipperary will be deemed to have
forfeited his life.
(c) Civilians who give information to the police or soldiery,
especially such information as is of a serious character, if convicted
will he executed, i.e. shot or hanged.
(d) Police, doctors, prison officials who assist at or who
countenance or who are responsible for, or in any way connected with the
drugging of an Irish citizen for the purpose of obtaining information,
will he deemed to have forfeited his life and may be hanged or drowned or
shot at sight as a commonoutlaw. Offending parties will be executed
should it take years to track them down.
(e) Every citizen must assist when required in enabling us to perform
our duty.
By Order.
Back came the reply from G.H.Q. within twenty-four hours: "That
proclamation must not be published!" that was all. I didn't think
at that time that Headquarters would have baulked at what the Proclamation
implied. I lost confidence in G.H.Q's vaunted "ruthless warfare".
There were about seven of us Volunteers 'on the run' for our lives in
South Tipperary at that time. We were on the alert 24 hours in the day,
while the R.I.C. were able to wove about with impunity, lording it over
all the people, mandhandling them, arresting them, questioning them,
searching them, raiding their houses, allowed to move around freely day
and night.
In those early days our young blood would boil at "caution" which
we then regarded as "the better part of cowardice." We began to think
37.
that G.H.Q., situated in Dublin which was very quiet indeed at that
time (February 19l9), had little notion of what we of the Southern
Counties were up against. In fact G.H.Q. never did get any practical
first-hand experience of the fight in either the City or the country.
Not a single member of the G.H.Q. staff ever came down the country to
see things for himself. They depended entirely on reports of local
officers, and, later, on reports of H.Q. Organisers who were trained in
the City on Regular Army military manuals. The best of these by far,
Ernie O'Malley, wasn't a week with us when he realised the difference
between organisation on paper and on the field, that guerillas and guerilla
tactics and training were nearly as far apart as the poles from Regulars
and their "orders are orders" training. Regulars are trained to be hide-
bound automatons, while it is necessary for Volunteers to be trained as
autonomous freelances.
When Ernie came to us he had a typewriter and a porter, trying to
satisfy G.H.Q.'s insatiable maw for written reports, until after we had
twelve of our most important houses burned after the Cullenswood House
raid, raid when we told Ernie that we would stand for no more written
reports from South Tipperary being sent to Dublin. Ernie very much
svmpathised with us. It was his despatches that had been captured!
To get back to the Proclamation. I had called a meeting of
Battalion Officers in anticipation of Headquarter's consent, and I had
had the Proclamation printed. The bundles were in the house where the
meeting was held. I explained what I had done and quoted H.Q's reply.
I added that I was sorry H.Q. would not sanction the promulgation of the
Proclamation; and that I wished G.H.C. were here for one week even, and
they'd probably change their minds: but that wasn't likely to happen.
The men had read the Proclamation and seemed very disappointed
that they were not to he allowed to paste it up. I then said with
significant deliberation: "As H.Q. has forbidden me to post up this
38.
Proclamation I hereby warn you all that if I see anyone pasting up one
of these posters on telegraph poles, trunks of trees, walls or on the
gable-ends of R.I.C. barracks or doors or windows, and especially if I
see you pinning one on to the tail of a Bobby's coat you will be
severely punished!"
They took me literally at my word: I never saw a more
enthusiastic scramble to get those papers out of my sight. In spite (?)
of my warning they were posted all over South Tipperary and a bit
farther away too. The above cow must have been the draft I had sent
to G.H.Q., the date was not inserted. If that be so it mustnor
have
been left behind in Cullenswood House along with a lot of other
important papers.
Seán Treacy's flair for organisation was only one outlet for his
enthusiasm and like Michael Collins (at least in this) he liked to have
a finger in the pie of every department. He acted Adjutant to me
sending out Orders as well as his own department of Vice-Commandant.
Dan Breen had been elected Quartermaster, but Seán seized every
opportunity to buy arms or ammunition and sell them to the Volunteers.
He had got some small arms from Peadar Clancy and he had been asked
by Mick Davoren to get him a revolver. We went to Kilshennan to see
him, Davoren, and Eamon O'Dwyer. Eamon had been acting in the Brigade
area as Quartermaster from the start of the reorganisation in 1917.
He had been proposed for Quartermaster at the Convention, but his
nomination was not accepted by the chairman as he wasthen being
denorted to England under the German Plot scare. When the need arose
Eamon was always prepared and willing to assist us with, or to get for
us, financial help. Sean Treacy dearly loved a chat with anyone who
was interesting. He wanted to spend the night in O'Dwyer's, but
Mick Davoren wouldn't hear of it. He knew his Battalion area and his
R.T.C. "It would be far too dangerous to stay any length of time in
39.
Kilflenane, and madness to sleep there." We compromised by sleeping just
across the road in O'Brien'st
Next morning when the Volunteer Guard was dismissed four R.I.C.
arrived. We four were in the diningroom having our breakfast and didn't
know a thing about it until they had gone. Mick Davoren had arrived
with a big fork ready to join in the fray. He had crept up close to a
constable who was on guard in front of the house. Mick was a very
puzzled young man when he saw the R.I.C. coming out and going off quite
unruffled. He rushed in to find out the explanation of the mystery.
They were only looking for the dog license. When Mrs. O'Brien and Mick
Davoren started talking excitedly, we walked out of the diningroom to find
out what was the excitement about. "Wouldn't it have been awful, Mick,'
said she "if the police had leaned, against the door, it would have opened"
- this is in reference to the diningroom door - the lock was worn and
flimsy. "Mam", said Seán Treacy, a couple of buckets of hot water would
clear away all the bloodstains."
The previous day Seán had shown Mick a .45 revolver "and the price
is £6." Mick knew that the Company hadn't six shillings but he was to
run a dance in Ballagh on the coming Sunday night, and invited the four
of us togo.
It meant a long stay in one Battalion area and Treacy
thoughtthat
would be too long. But I knew we were as safe as could be in
Kilnamanagh Battalion, and it was the first visit I had been able to pay
to my old Company and Battalion since Soloheadbeg. We stayed. The
dance was a great success. Mick Davoren had a few pounds over for the
Company funds after paying for the revolver. This taste of the old care-
free life was only an appetiser to young Seán Hogan. After dancing all
night in Ballagh he went off with a pretty girl from Glenough to another
dance in Meagher's of Enfield. I had left the dance in Ballagh early in
the night, Seán Treacy and Breen followed some time after, We knew that
40.
Hogan was with the O'Keeffe girl at the dance in Ballagh, and we
expected he'd be late. Sean Treacy had warned Mick Davoren to keep
an eye on Hogan and make sure that he'd come straight to O'Keeffe's
after the dance. Mick has told the story of how artfully the dodger
dodged him.
Next morning the three of us were wakened by Paddy Kinane who
burst into the room and almost indignantly asked "Do you fellows not
know that one of your fellows is arrested" It was no surprise to us
to he told that a Volunteer had been arrested. "Who" Excitedly
Paddy pointed at us and repeated "One of your chaps". "Is it young
Hogan" asked Dan The three of us got up and dressed quickly in
silence. The first thing that came to my mind was one of Seán Hogan's
dicta: "Ireland will never be free until she can produce a Robert Emmet
who doesn't give a damn about women". He evidently didn't think Éire
was capable of producing any such thing.
There was from the beginning a gentleman's understanding among us,
never spoken but as clearly understood as if it had been an oath, that
we would all four stand or fall together. There was never a doubt in
our minds that we'd rescue Hogan or pass out for good; but we wanted to
do it to the best advantage that is, with a clean getaway. Treacy was
even jocose about the sensation the rescue would cause,
First we thought of cycling or getting a motor car and rushing the
R.I.C. barracks at once. This would have been feasible if we were sure
they didn't yet know who the prisoner was. Paddy Kinane was able to
tell us that they didn't know him yet but that policemen were on their
way from Tipperary town to identify him. By the time we would be able
to get into Thurles they'd know and be well prepared. We sat down to
reason out the problem. I enquired of the older people what was the
usual routine for dealing with ordinary criminals There had been so
41.
little crime commditted in the district that it was some time before we
could get any information. We finally learned that prisoners taken to
Thurles could be taken either to Dublin, Cork or Tipperary town
nothing very definite to work on!
If Hogan were taken to Dublin I knew I could organise between the
kimmage Garrison and the Dublin Brigade (men well known to me) sufficient
numbers of determined men to storm the Court. If he were brought to
Tipperary town it would be a relatively simple matter, but if to Cork -
that was terra incognita to us then - well, he must not be allowed to
reach it.
The first station the train would stop at in South Tipperary area
would be Goulds Cross. I sent a despatch to Mick Davoren ordering him
to have twenty-five men or as many men as he could arm mobilised under
cover not more than half a mile from Goulds Cross, and await further
directions. Davoren carried out the order and was a very disappointed
man when no further orders arrived.
Seán Treacy, who was Vice Commandant and therefore Director of
Organisation (than whom there was none better) suggested that it would
be better not to attempt the rescue before Limerick Junction to see if
Hogan would be brought to Tipperary town where there were more arms,
and more Volunteers could be mobilised more easily and quicker. I agreed
sorrowfully hut not reluctantly. I would have liked my old Battalion
and Company to have had the honour of assisting us. It was then decided
to attack the train at Emly or Knocklong. Treacy was deputed to
mobilise the a1bally Volunteers whomhe knew to be first class men.
His despatches were many and quick. The Thurles Volunteers were asked
to display no curiosity or excitement either at the barracks or the
railway station. One man was to he casually knocking about in the
station and to board it if Hogan were on it. Micksy Connell was the man.
42.
Any earlier information was to be sent by wire in code. Treacy, Breen
and I went to Danny Maloney's about a mile from Knocklong Station. We
watcher! every train from early morning - one man only unobtrusively
watching with local Volunteers there 'on business'.
When the train with Hogan on it arrived Seán Treacy was on the
platform, Breen and I concealed outside at the gate. Word was to be
sent to Breen and me immediately it was learned that Hogan was on the
train. I think it well to mention that I guessed or surmised after the
rescue backed up by other incidents that Seán wanted to carry out some
things on his own. It had been arranged that the Galbally Volunteers
would board the train at Emly if Hogan were on it. When the train
arrived Treacy immediately led the crowd to the carriage where the R.I.C.
and Hogan were. He did not send word as ordered to the two of us
waiting at. the gate. The first notice we got was the report of firing.
Dan Breen seemed to have guessed at once that Hogan was on the train he
made a burst thro' the gate. I followed with vengeance in my heart.
I thought that as Treacy hadn't sent word that some fool Volunteer had seen
a soldier armed and couldn't resist the temptation to seize it. That
would have put the 'caoi bais' on our hopes of a surprise attack when the
train did arrive In the heat of that awful moment I was determined to
shoot off-hand whoever was guilty. As I got to the platform I noticed
Micksy O'Connell with the newspaper in his hand and realised that Hogan
was on the train. Dan Breen hadn't reached the carriage where the fight
had already taken place when Constable O'Reilly started to fire at the
already retreating Volunteers. Dan was such a big target that O'Reilly
didn't miss him. This constable Bicked at least two others -Had
O'Brien and Scanlon. We were soon all outside the
gate attending to Breen who got a severe bullet wound below the collarbone.
I asked anxiously what on earth had happened .when someone said
"Where is Hogan" I dashed into the station and found Hogan smiling
43.
with his handcuffs on trying to scale a wall! I led him out. "But
where is Seán Treacy-?" I wanted to know. No one knew. "He was in
the carriage with us" I was told. As Seán didn't turn up I became very
anxious and got the whole crowd to disperse after Hogan's handcuffs
were removed. Breen was weak with loss of blood and they hastened him
away with Hogan. There was general delight among them all because of
the success of the rescue. It didn't occur to any of them that
anything could have happened to Treacy. "He must have got out the other
side of the train". I thought that was probably true but Seán would
have made his way to where the rest of us were. But there was no sign
of Seán. I moved along the station outside the hedge up to just beyond
the engine where there was another gate. I stood up on the gate and
scanned the fields and hedges. I saw two civilians searching the hedge
on the other side of the train. They looked like two British officers
in civies. With my trench coat, leggings and ny- hand in my pocket I
glared in their direction to let them know they were being watched.
After a few minutes one of them glanced round and saw me. He at once
furtively put his revolver into his pocket and spoke at the same tine
(without looking at him to his companion who immediately straightened
up, dusted his trousers and the two sauntered back towards the train
but keeping close to theor
hedge. The fact that these two had been
searching the hedge was a good indication that someone had gone that
way. I waited till the train started to move off, and then I made my
way to Maloney's the only house or people I knew in the whole
district. It was a bit nerve-racking as the wires must have been hot
with calls for police and military. I had about a mile to go before I
could get off the main road and under cover. To add to my discomfort
the chain of the bike kept coining off. When I reached Maloney's I
found them all hilariously delighted. "J.J. is rescued J.J. is
rescued!" ("J.J." stood for John Joe Hogan). When I spoke of my
anxiety about seán Treacy they all laughed it off: "Terra, nothing could
happen to Sean!"
44.
Some little time before this we had been in this area and,
noticing a peculiar formation in a mountain, I said "That paicuar
shape must be noticeable for miles around." "Yes" Seán had replied,
"and there is a great family living at the foot of it, Foley's".
"Then if ever we get separated for any reason we could all make towards
Foley's", I suggested. We allagreed, not thinking that the occasion
would arise so soon. On our second visit to Maloney's we had been so
taken up with the need to rescue Hogan that we never thought of fixing
a rendevouz in case of necessity. In any case we couldn't imagine the
four of us being separated after the coming rescue.
When I told Danny Maloney what we had agreed (about making our
separate ways to Foley's), Danny said, "That's just where they have
taken Dan arid J.J. Hogan." I had to wait till nightfall before anyone
could risk going to Foley's. When we arrived there we found that
Seán Treacy had male his way there too. Seán had been shot thro' the
neck the bullet passing between the windpipe and the jugular vein. He
was not bleedin too much. A doctor was got at once. He patched up
Breen and started on Seán Treacy, probing to find the passage of the
bullet.
When the probing instrument came out at last at the other side of
the wound the Doctor stepped back with arms akimbo, head to one side
admiring his handiwork like a thrush eyeing a worm. He was a clever
doctor and, like most really clever people, was quite a simple soul.
While still holding his admiring posture he explained the near (?)
miraculous passage of the bullet. The Doctor turned up early next
morning and went thro' the same routine. He ordered Breen immediate
rest; he was not to be removed. Dan was raving by this time. He
went through the same operation with Seán. I noticed that Seán's
wound must have begun to heal for I could see the effort he was making
to show no sign of feeling any pain. That the wound was healing was
45.
clear enough to me because the. passage was closing arid it took the
Doctor a long time to get the instrument thro'. When he succeeded he
went thro' the same posing. When the Dootor came the third time (he
was very attentinl he began on Seán again. This time I ventured to
ask the Doctor if this probing were necessary. I remembered my very
young days when girls had to go thro' the agony of keeping a string or
wire ear-ring moving in the lobe of the ear to keep a passage open, and
it struck me that Sean's flesh was already knitting as the Doctor was
having great trouble trying to get the instrument through and I feared
that Seán would be able to wear a necklace thro' his neck instead of
round it. The Doctor immediately said "No, it is really not necessary".
I then said apologetically that I thought the patient was suffering great
pain. He said quite simply "I just wanted to see the passage again".
The Doctor, was insistent that Dan Breen should not be removed; but
there was no alternative as the Foley's were too well known to risk
staying any longer there. By this time I was so fagged from want of
three nights' sleep without sitting down except to snatch a meal, that I
scarcely remember our leaving Foley's. Dan was in great pain. The pony
and trap we took to the road in, was so very jolty on the hilly roads
that Dan had to be held from falling forward or backward. We reached
West limerick and were brought to a house on a hilly place where we had a
Short rest.
Sean Treacy's wound did not damp his spirits, he was as full of
energy as ever and I don't think he lost a moment's sleep. But I have
no doubt that he secretly suffered a lot because he'd turn away
suddenly on occasions (pretending he had something urgent to do) with his
hand to his throat and a little cough it must have been very
painful to cough at all.
Seán had made all the arrangements with the local Volunteers, whom
he knew, about procuring transport to take us to the Shannon, on our way
46.
to Clare. There were few motors in those days and fewer still whose
owners could be trusted. But lorries and official motor cars were
plentiful and constantly on the road since Hogan's rescue. When scouts
reported that a motor car had turned off the main road and was coming
towards us I became alarmed. Treacy and Breen were soon ready to take
the road. When I begged the two of them to move off at once, (as their
progress would have to be a slow one) while Hogan and I would fight a
delaying action, neither would move. Treacy saw that Breen's revolver
was in working order and had his own ready for action. Hogan and I
went out with bombs (the pins out!), carbines and revolvers, to meet
whatever the Fates had sent. Scouts had moved down and discovered that
they were friends just in time.
I would like to interject here a word on Sean Hogan. (See attached
letter to Secretary, M/S. Pensions Board, September, 1935).
Seeappendix No Xiii
He had
just come thro' the nerve-racking experience of his capture and
'bloody' release without a quiver. He was only 18 years of age and
he stood beside me as cool as the proverbial cucumber. When the men
in the car came up to him to shake hands he smilingly warned them that
he thought it would be better to wait till he could get the pin back
in the bomb!
In a couple or days we got to Mick Brennan's Brigade area where
we were comfortable for some weeks while Seán Treacy and Breen
recuperated. I gave them some lessons in swimming and diving at which
I was (relatively) an expert. Clean-living lads they got well in a
remarkably short time. We had been so long away from Dublin that we
thought it well to go there to see how things were developing at
Headquarters and be on the prowl for arms our chronic need!While
there We Were summoned to a meeting to fore a G.H.Q. A.S.H.
When, later, a Dublin Brigade A.S.U. was formed the other one became
known as "The Souad". Mulcahy, the Chief of Staff, presided. He
told us that we would be expected to do all sorts of 'jobs' but nothing
47.
that entailed more than the minimum of risk; he warned us that if any
of us were caught or killed we would be quite possibly disowned. The
meeting was horrified at this latter suggestion but no one said anything.
Mulcahy dismissed us telling us that there was no compulsion on anyone
to become a member of the Unit; that we were to go home and consider
things for ourselves and come back to another meeting fixed for some short
time later. Seán Treacy and Dan Breen were highly indignant at the idea
of our being told that we would be repudiated if caught; Mulcahy's
"possibly" was ignored! They discussed it with most of the other men
after the meeting. I argued with them but I could not convince them that
at that time it was the only sensible thing for G.H.Q. to do. The
political and Army headquarters were still comparatively free; nothing
of a military-action nature was so far traceable to them. Dáil Éireann
had not been proclaimed an illegal organisation. This was good for the
Movement as a whole. When the four of us arrived at the second meeting
the only other man to turn up and sign on was Jim Slattery. Some weeks
after another meeting was called and this time a large number of names
were given in. What changed I don't know. At first we were put on the
track of "G" men, then spies, then big game: Lord French.
The first time I found Mick Collins to be a bit of an artful dodger,
was when he arranged the first, the 'phoney' attack on French. Volunteer
officers were up in Dublin for a Convention under cover of a Sinn Féin
Convention in the autumn of 1919. When the Convention was over and before
the officers had time to go home Mick Collins rounded up officers from all
parts of the country. He came personally to Mrs. Boland's to waken up
Breen and me andhad
O'Brienof Galbally (who were on their way to
U.S.A. for, as Mick said: "An attempt on French's life". Mick gave
Seán Treacy and me "they shall not pass" point to hold: the last corner
French would pass before the Castle was reached. We were told that the
convoy was to be attacked all the way from Dunlaoghaire; if French
48.
escaped these ambushes we two were to see to it that he didn't get
past us alive. We were to keep moving as if we were innocent civilians
and yet we were to stay at our post! We were told that French was
coming on the early mail boat to Dún Laoghaire, that he'd be driven by
convoy to the Castle, and that it would not be later than 5 am. As
Treacv and I killed time walking up and down not turning round till we
saw that no one was in sight to notice that we were loitering, I began
to realise that Seán always strode in front of me particularly as it
drew near 5 o'clock. I knew that Sean's sight was not very good so
I kept close to him. At last Seán stopped and said with his usual grin:
"Would you mind taking the driver' I want to get the old 'josser'".
"All right Sean!." It was so close to zero hour that we didn't care who
saw us we were out in the middle of the road to block the car.
As 5 o'clock struck we heard the noise of a number of men walking
round the corner talking loudly and laughing. We wheeled round to see
a what or who was coming. Round the corner from Dame Street came Mick
Collins, Seán Ua Muirlíhe, Seán NcGarry, Thomas McCurtain and others.
"It's all right" shouted Mick "he isn't coming!" I was delighted to
see Thomas McCurtain whom I hadn't seen since our Reading Gaol days.
Thomas was delighted, too, not at meeting me, but at having got a
splendid revolver which he declared he wasn't going to part with! I
learned much later that French, instead of being in Britain was in his
Roscommonestate and there was no word at all of him coming that time
to Dublin. However, Mick was able to give the impression to the
Volunteer officers from all over the country that he not only organised
the attacks on spies that had begun in Dublin but that he also led them,
taking part in them! Certainly Mick organised this "attack" on French;
he mobilised the men for it and he was out himself that morning. And
that was the nearest I ever saw Mick Collins to a fight.
49.
Towards the end of 1920 and the beginning of 1921 the British press
had been changing its description of Collins from a "thoug" and
"murderer" to "a daredevil"; romanticising him with damnation that praised
him in the sight of the Trish people. He was "seen" ail over the country
leading the columns from Dublin to West Cork where he had been 'seen"
riding on a white charger like King William at the Boyne. But it was
Tom Parry who rode the horse because of a strained foot and King William
rode a brown horse! This sort of journalism is not history but it is
blatant propaganda. In the case of Mick Collins it put him on a pedestal
where he did not oroperly belong. It enhansed his undoubted influence
beyond all bounds. "What's good enough for Mick Collins is good enough
for Me.-X- It is clear that the British press had got its directions and
the anti-national press in Ireland simply quoted the English press without
comment ... knowing the reports were false. They could see the aim
behind this personal propaganda. And when Collins treacherously signed
The Articles for a Treaty in 1921 the anti-Republican press to a sheet
became fulsome in their praise of Collins whom they would have handed over
to the British if they could from 1916.
I think it well to state categorically that Nick Collins never fired
a shot at British enemy during the whole of the Tan war nor during Easter
Week 1916. No exception can be taken to me making that statement even
now that Collins is dead because I challenged him (and any Deputy who
cared to take up the challenge) to say if he ever fired even one shot at
-X-....
as Deputy after I.R.B. Deputy declared before announcing
his decision to vote for the 'Theaty', thereby renouncing his Oath to the
Republic determined to swear (false?) fealty to his Satanic (excuse me)
his Brittain Majesty.
50.
the British enemy during the Tan war or during Easter Week 1916. I made
that chal1ene during the debates on the 'Treaty'.
No blame attaches to Collins for this: it would have been wrong of
Collins to have exposed himself during the Tan War, he was too important
to the Army. And I should like to add no one ever heard him lay claim
to the fantastic things attributed to him by the British press copied by
the sycophantic Irish press without comment!
This dummyattack on French was followed by other other apparently
serious attempts; but they all failed because of inaccurate information.
Sean Hogan and Treacy were on these attempts. I was back in Tipperary at
Headquarters. I got word in time to be at the only serious attack that
came off at Ashtown. I have written an account of this affair in the
'Evening Telegraph'. (See copy attached). PhotisturtTeaXIN
Dan Breen was taken to Malone's of Grantham Street. He was weak from
loss of blood and only half conscious. A very young priest was brought to
hear his Confession, but someone had rushed in proclaiming aloud that
Martin Savage's body had been refused admission to Phibsboro' Chapel. Dan
refused to go to Confession saying: "If my dead body isn't fit to be taken
into the Church then I'm not fit to be in it alive". The young priest was
very nervous. The house was full of armed men. He was fumbling
nervously with his stole. Arguments started forand against but when the
Bishop's condemnation was referred to, it seemed to put 'finis' to all
argument. I hadn't said a word un to this but I was very anxious about
-X- Having heard me make the 'challenge' the Minister of Defence, Cathal
Brugha, requested me to ask officially at question time what status
Michael Collins held in the Army; to which I thought it well to add the
further question; whether it is recorded anywhere that Collins had ever
fired a shot at the British?
One looks in vain to find either the question or the answer in the
new editions (27/2/'25) of The Dáil Debates.
51.
Dan not going to Confession. It occurred to me that this was one
occasion where a Hail Vary was called for. I whispered it to myself,
then, like an inspiration an idea occurred to me. I stepped up to the
bed and said: "Look here, Dan, the way I look on this whole business is
this: I wont mind so much going to hell for something I will have got
a damned good kick out of but I'll be damned if I'll go to hell just to
please the Bishops!" The apparent logic, coupled with the flavour of a
fighting spirit behind it, worked. Dar thought for a moment then nodded
towards the priest.
Dan Preen was Brigade Quartermaster and it suited him to remain
almost permanently in Dublin. In "My Fight for Irish Freedom" the claim
is made not only that he was in Tipperary during all the fighting but that
"the men who were with me were ..." at the capture of Drangan Barracks
and at !-lollyford Barracks and other places, as if he were either in charge
or worse still "the group in charge" (which always included himself) - as
if the T.R.A. in South Tipperary were a mob-led gang. Dan Breen was
never put in charge of a fight from and including Soloheadbeg during the
whole of the Tan War, nor was he present at either of them. His name
is not mentioned on the official lists.les adbhmanI.II.III.Iv
Following the capture of a dispatch-rider with a despatch, with the
names and numbers of the battalions then existing, Seán Treacy as Vice
Commandant and Director of Organisation for the Brigade suggested a
change of the numbers of the battalions. What was the First became the
Fourth, the Second became the Third and the latest formed at Rathsallagh
became the First. This latter Battalion soon became the Headquarters of
the Brigade; the Battalion O/C. Jerome Devin's home was Headquarters for
the Battalion also. The Devin household was at the disposal of the
Volunteers every member of the family was in the armed forces except
the eldest son who-was studying for the priesthood - Father Frank Devin.
X Les yahmanes lesI.II.III.IV.
52.
Besides local Volunteers and Brigade staff-officers there
were so many callers from Q.H.Q., the eight battalions and
despatch-riders that the Devins were getting into straightened
circumstances financially. This state of affairs applied to
a big number of farmers. These people housed, fed and gave us
change of underwear. Whole columns would on occasions be
billeted for from two to three days at a time. These good
people were too proud to drop even a hint of their embarrassment.
It was only by an accident that I discovered this state of
affairs so I decided to spread the burden a little more evenly
by asking G.R.Q. to allow us to issue a levy-appeal to the
people.
I sent a copy of the suggested appeal to Dublin. This
suggestion was incorporated in G.H.Q.'s General Order No. 15
(copy attached) and it was quoted in Ant-Oglach at the time,
but that is suppressed in the later edition.
In about the end of March, 1920 the R.I.C. left the
barracks at Lisronagh very near our Br1gade Headquarters.
I immediately wrote G.H.Q. pointing out the necessity for its
destruction and suggesting that this applied to all other
vacated R.I.C. barracks all over the country, and that if a
General Order were issued for a definite date the element
of surprise would be ours.
53.
I feared that if we burned Lisronagh barracks first the British
authorities might awaken to the advisability of reoccupying these barracks,
strengthening them and manning them better. C.H.Q. issued an order to
destroy all vacated R.I.C. barracks in the country.
-X- Word seems to have been sent to the R.I.C. in Clonmel because
Lisronagh barracks was reoccupied secretly and greatly strengthened the day
before the order for the destruction of all vacated barracks was to be
carried out. The R.I.C. were lying in ambush for the Volunteers who were
under orders to destroy the barracks. The police opened fire and our
lade, taken completely by surprise, had great difficulty in fighting their
way out of the hornet's nest; they did so without any serious casualty.
Jerome Davin, the O/C. of the Battalion, realising that lisronagh was
close to the borders of the 5th Battalion (Clonmel) had sent word to
Clonmel to have the roads leading to Clonmel blocked on the day the
vacated barracks was to be destroyed. No barracks were destroyed in the
5th Battalion area that day. Whether or not there was any connection
between all this and the ambush at Lisronagh it had already
become, otherwise, clear that some of the older I.R.B. officer personnel
or Battalion 5 had become wore passivist Sinn Féiners than Volunteers.
Sometime in 1919 Seán Treacv and Pan Breen had convinced me (I being a
young and little known City man) that it would be better for us and the
Movement as a whole if someone better known who would commandthe respect
of the people in general were Brigade O/C., and Treacy suggested Frank
Drohan as the most suitable man. Drohan was an I.R.B. man and in local
polities. Thinking that Treacy knew his countrymen's psycho1o' I agreed.
Treacv wrote G.H.Q. making the offer of the change. But the C/S., Richard
Mulcahv instead of a direct reply sent me a letter written to him by
Drohan in which he (Drohan) complained that the four of us were going round
the country creating disturbance! We instituted an inquiry into the
whole working of the 5th Battalion. The result was that the whole staff
was reduced to the ranks except the Battalion Adjutant, Sean Quirke who
was the only officer able to clear himself beyond doubt.
54.
Towards the end of ]920 the British were very active raiding
continuously especially at night and always in large force: they'd slow
up the lorries, some soldiers would drop out, lie in ambush for whatever
would come along. Lorries seemed to break down fairly frequently and on
enquiring from the Engineers I learned that Crossley tenders were very
vujnerahle in their axels. The roads were not repaired for quite a
long time (road workers were afraid of being shot or taken prisoner) and
the pot-holes took a heavy toll of the crossleys. It is easy to guess
that it struck me that if we increased the number of pot-holes it would
be to our advantage. I thought it well to ask G.H.Q's permission and at.
the same time they could take the hint to spread the idea further if
they approved ... and I couldn't think of any reason why we shouldn't
be allowed to go ahead. But G.H.Q. replied after about a week that the
Department of Local Government would not sanction "the destruction of
the peoples' property". This was the first time G.H.Q. had given any
reason for their decisions in a despatch, and that, taken in conjunction
with the delay in answering led me to think that G.H.Q. was not pleased
with this Government decision. I prepared a letter to G.H.Q.
emphasising the necessity to slow up and make more costly the raids of
the military and that the Volunteers had too much guard work and that
casualties were on the increase. I don't remember whether or not I sent
that letter to Dublin, but I do remember that I got round the difficulty
by issuing a Brigade order to all Companies to enlarge the existing potholes!
I guessed that the ordinary Volunteers, knowing the idea behind
the order, would not likely stop at merely enlar4ng the existing potholes,
they would make some holes to enlarge, so I included in the order
that they were to make sure that the holes were so arranged that carts
could pass around them, It wasn't very long before Headquarters wona
the consent of Government for the Pot-holing Policy and issued an
instruction on the matter. Included in the Brigade Order was an
55.
instruction that where a section of road was made impassable they were
to make sire that a getaway into the adjacent field was available for
country carts to pass. If lorries tried to use these fields they'd get
bogged down.
About midsummer of 1920 I ussued an instruction to the Brigade that
Volunteers caught inside houses where civilians were living should not fire
until they were outside the house, This was not an order...
because
circumstances might arise where the Volunteers would have no alternative.
I had had occasion to note that some very good Volunteers thought that the
civilian population was at best only a secondary consideration. One night
(I think it was when I went to Dublin to investigate the tragic Fernside
affair and the consequent death of Professor Carolin and Sean Treacy) three
of us were in The Monument Creamery in Camden Street when about 5 a.m. we
were awakened by Tans and, or, Auxies, breaking into the rere of the whole
block of buildings. Mrs. Ryan said that if they came to her place that
she'd scream, and scream so as not to be forced to say anything incriminating.
When they started to break into the back of the Creamery I said that we had
better et out to the back so that the British wouldn't know which house we
had come out of, and fight our way out. Mick Sheehan who was extre1y
brave but devoid of much imagination insisted that it was our duty to defend
ourselves by taking any and every advantage and therefore we should stay
inside and fight it out from inside the house. I cut the argument short:
"We'll get outside first!" Luckily they did not search any of the houses:
they were looking for some motor car, possibly the one we had come to Dublin
in hut It had returned to Tipperary.
With regard to the Fernside affair Dan Breen reported verbally to me.
I had made up my mind much earlier that written reports were too dangerous.
Even a letter I had written to Dan about a month previously had been left
behind in Carolin'5, Theattacked
co is taken from :-
56.
"The Administration of Ireland," By I.O. .... .
"The allusion to Dwyer in the above letter is interesting.
Edward Dwyer was 'Adjutant "G" Company, 1st Battalion, 3rd Tipperary
Brigade, I.R.A. Francis Dwyer, his brother, was 'Captain "F" Company'
of the same battalion and brigade. They were shot dead by masked men
outside their houses at Ballydavid, near Tipperary, about 11 p.m. on the
l8th October 1920. It is not too much to infer that they were suspected
of dangerous weakness by their accomplices, and paid the invariable
penalty in such cases."
(The Administration of Ireland 1920). I.O. Published in
April 1921.
Philip Allen & Co., (Quality Court,Chandery lane, London.
The foot notes are I.Os It should be noticed that I.O. has
suppressed my signature'S. Mac. R. This is one of many indications to
me, at least, that the British did not want it known that I was the
O/C of South Tipperary Brigade. Someone once said to me that Dan Breen's
phvsiogamv was more suitable for British Propaganda! Not only did I.O.
suppress my si2nature but he deliberately changed the context for example:
He changed "E. O'Dwyer" to "E. Dwyer" and couples this with "his brother
Francis Dwyer, both of whomwere murdered by the I.R.A. because of
"suspected weakness".
(See letter attached)
"I.O" is a typical Orange-Free Masonic British propagandist. He
hides behind annonimity; he is so choke-full of inane hatred of Ireland
and Catholicism that, like the Free Masonic Englishman, he "will always
be able to find sound practical reasons" for getting round any
inconvenient principle, even truth. He has the temerity to claim that
yhemanXVI
57.
almost all the burnings of the British and all their killings of
civilians were attributable to the I.R.A.
58.
SYNOPSIS OF LIFE
SEUMASROBINSON.
Born in Belfast January 6th, 1890. Attended Dominican Convent
Schools (Falls Road); Irish Christian Brothers (St. Mary's, Divis
Street), and De La Salle Brothers, Clonard, Belfast. family had to
leave Belfast in 1903 and migrated to Glasgow, where I attended Marist
Brothers' Schools, St. Andrew's, and St. Michael's College, Dumfries,
where I passed Scottish Intermediate. Two years later I gave up study
owing to eve strait and took up Domestic Engineering in Montcalm and
Moncouers, Edinburgh.
Joined Gaelic League in Glasgow in 1903. My eldest brother, Joe,
had been the first Fianna boy to join in Belfast when Bulmer Hobson
started the organisation there. In 1902 the Belfast Fianna were first
called 'The Red Branch Knights'. Joe had always been determined to
devote his life to the Fenian ideal and did not want me actively
engaged in the movement so that I should look after the old people at
home while he would be carefree.
Mv active service began in 1898 when, with more audacity than wit,
I joined in a counter attack (made by an advance party of a Nationalist
procession celebrating the '98 centenary) on a charging crowd of
Orangemen. This Orange attack was launched from the fields where the
new Celtic football grounds now stands. I had not the least fear -
eight years of age. But as I grew older and developed imagination to
did physical fear grow in me, until now I am afraid of my life - of
wife.
59.
later I became an expert stone-thrower in our own special
"No Man's land", (between Protestant and Catholic communities)
which was the field at the rere of Traver's factory, Springfield
Road. Here the younger boys of both faiths used to delight in
trying to knock hell out of one another - for the love of God and
King Billy. The Protestant boys were usually four to five times our
numbers. I learned a good deal from the Orange boys, who used always
have a rough discipline and would move in organised bodies. They
had the rudiments of strategy and tactics, while our bigger boys had
no stomach for order, strategy, tactics, or any other darn thing
except an unholy desire to get down to single combat by the shortest
possible route. The Orange bys would be drawn up in two lines,
one line straight in front of our crowd, the other "moseying" round
our left flank (that is, if a crowd has a flank) until the two Orange
groups were fairly well separated. Then someone would start a
charge on our side. The swiftest boys led off, the others followed
according to their fleetness; and our lads soon had the formation of
an arrow head, quite unintentionally, of course. As no point in the
Orange ranks was prepared to receive that spear-point and the weight
behind it, well, the Orange boys turned and ran, keeping their rough
formation. When they ran we increased our speed instinctively, and
made rapid progress until someone woke up, as it were, and saw the
Orange flank closing in on our left rere. When that occurred, we
turned and made those Orange boys run; we surely made them fly -
but they never were able to catch us.
There was the usual Nationalist tradition in our family, that is,
Home Rule; but I was thirty years of age when I learned for the first
time that my grandfather had been a Fenian and that that was the
reason my father and the younger members of his family were born in
60.
France. The grandfather had been enabled to get to France after
'48 with the help of his Protestant employer who bad a great regard
for him and his ability as an Engineer. However, the Bishops must
have put the caoi bais on most of the family as they acknowledged
the Hierarchy's power to impose their Jansenistic condemnations.
He set up machinery all over North-Eastern France and North-Western
Germany, thus helping to start German industry at the middle of the
19th century.
To cut this narrative short I didn't accept the right of the
Hierarchy-, and I took the Fenian oath in Glasgow in 1915. The amount
of thought, theology and passionate longing I went through and
suffered to bring my conscience into line with the I.R.B. ideal I
cannot attempt to describe, but in the end I was able to take the
I.R.H. manly oath in good faith.
The Glasgow Volunteers had many in their ranks who were working
in munition factories and shipyards. These men brought out
information and keys, and the Fianna under Joe Robinson and Seamus
Reader constantly raided for explosives. The years leading up to
1916 in Glasgow, and the daring, the astuteness and ease with which
even Scotland Yard was "codded", is an episode that should some day
be written.
In the meantime our I.R.B. Centre (Tom McDonnell) told us that
all ablebodied young men with any engineering training were to report
at once in Dublin. Next day a number of us dodged the "G" men (it
was easy; we knew them, and they did not know the rank and file) and
we got to Dublin safely. The batch I came in was the second to leave
Glasgow.
61.
When the Irish men were taken into the confidence of the
Scottish Police Headquarters, the sabotage in the shipyards and the
raids for explosives that had been going on (several submarines
never came un on their first trial) and other destruction which had
been attributed previously to the Anarchists, was now rightfully
attributed to us, and therefore we were very much on the run once
we left Glasgow. We were employed in the Kimmage Garrison making
cases for bombs, funny looking bayonets for shotguns, buckshot, and
sharpening swords (!) at least once; and we even attempted to make
a gun. There was something of a joke in this gun-making business,
and I spiked the gun literally in order to spike it metaphorically.
George Plunkett wanted a long-range buckshot gun, which simply could
not be made out of a piece of malleable iron piping - even though it
be called "gun metal". The charge was doubled and jammed tightly.
The "pun" was fired. I have heard of Peter Pan losing his shadow
and getting
itback again. When that gun went off I thought I had lost
my zenith, that it was trying to fall on my head - something nearly
hit me.
Our life in the garrison was only mildly exciting. There were
no baths, and few disinfectants. Existence became most uncomfortable;
a dry shampoo against a wooden stanchion was not much of a palliative.
It did, however, turn some backbiters into bosom pals.
When the Rebellion did not come off on Sunday there were growls
and mumblings among ourselves; but it came off on Monday, and all was
well. Some of us burned our papers, saying we would soldier for the
rest of our lives. We thought the Germans would help and that the
country would rise with us.
62.
On Monday morning George Plunkett put me in charge of a
section. On the way to O'Connell Street, Peadar Bracken showed
me an order signed by James Connolly telling him to take Kelly's
Gun shop and also Hopkins & Hopkins. He then told me to take over
Hopkins & Hopkins, while he took over Kelly's on Bachelors Walk
corner. I halted the section at O'Connell Bridge and explained what
we had to do. We walked over quietly, I wondering how long we would
be bursting into a burglar-proof jeweller's shop - steel shutters
all round. The section scattered to find a ladder, and in the
meantime I held up a mountain of a D.M.P. man. With my little
shotgun I must have looked like a Lilliputian threatening Gulliver
with a peashooter. I had to break into something bordering on
blasphemy before I could get that good-natured, and only mildly
scared hobby to stand until we could get inside the building. He
kept backing and repeating that he had nothing to do with us, that
the military would deal with us. I told him, as seriously as I
could, that if he didn't stand his wife would be a widow and his
children orphans. No good. I was getting worried. He kept
backing away. I did not want to shoot the man, but also I didn't
want him to go away too soon to tell his precious military that we
were out - until I was in. Again, no good. At last I yelled, as
savagely as I could: "Stand or" (and I took aim; I couldn't tell
to a yard or two where his heart was) "by God or the devil, or both,
I'll let you have two ounces of indigestible buckshot in your
stomach". He stood. I thanked God and forgot the devil.
On glancing along Eden Quay I saw a large body of cavalry
coming in my direction. Heavens! Now I stood for an instant,
marvelling that the British could have got word and have acted so
quickly. I could see none of my men. A dictionary may define
63.
panic, but at that moment I knew what it was. I realised at
once that I wasn't too cowardly (though I had often previously
wondered how I would react to danger) because I was willing (although
I had no liking for it), to pat my body and its miserable little
shotgun with composition bayonet between the cavalry and the G.P.O.
I have always dreaded being, or even appearing to be ridiculous.
I think I have always had a sense of the ridiculous, (a sense of
the ridiculous is the saving grace of humour), and it surely made
me feel and look ridiculous to the passersby,when they beheld a
little fellow looking grim - at least I felt that way - lying flat
on the road in the slight protection of the foot-kerb, with his
little gun aimed at the halted column of cavalry. Some elderly
gentleman in a motor car, who had passed the G.P.O. and had seen
what was happening, dashed up to the cavalry as they came on to
O'Connell Street, and was soon holding up the cavalry leader and
gesticulating towards the G.P.O., evidently telling the officer all
about it. The leader looked up O'Connell Street once or twice,
then shook his head and pointed over his shoulder. In moments of
real danger how quick and clear instinct becomes. I saw as clearly
as if I had heard him sneak the words, that soldier say he was in
charge of a party escorting something, and was simply under orders
to do just that job. He shook the reins and moved off, crossing
O'Connell Street from Eden Quay to Bachelors Walk and on to the
Four Courts, where they were met with fire. The Volunteers there
were evidently in possession by the time the cavalry reached the
Pour Courts.
There was nothing for it now but to break into the house next
to Honkins & Hopkins and wait for the return of what remained of my
original section. I found, to my delight, that two of my men had
64.
had already got in before me. They were Seamus Lundy of Liverpool
(R.I.P) and Cirnac Turner, a Glasgow Battalion man. Together we
broke through the walls into the jewellers', made what barricades
we could on the ground floor, and waited all day for the charge we
expected to take place at any moment. About an hour after we were
inside weinside
to get word to the G.P.O. that there were only
three men holding the buildings from O'Connell Bridge to the D.B.C.
on the south-eastern side of O'Connell Bridge. The rest of my men
had gone on to the G.P.O.La
men were sent to us: Andy
Fitzpatrick, Andy Conroy, and another Citizen Army man whose name
I've forgotten.
The week was a hectic one, especially whenever we had to cross
to the G.P.O. under machine gun fire. It became so dangerous that
I had to do most of my own message.. A bit foolish, though, for
an O/C. to do; but, after all, perhaps the whole fiat was rather
foolish from a military point of view. It became much too hot when
the buildings (I think ours was the fir5t to be set on fire in the
G.P.O. area) began to crackle. We got across to the G.P.O. on
Thursday night under terrific fire and I was from that on between
the G.P.O. and the Metropole Hotel. After the evacuation of the
G.P.O. I was in Moore Street and Moore Lane. On the Saturday
morning Plunkett asked for Volunteers for the third charge down
Moore Street. I volunteered (I couldn't help it, with Plunkett
looking at) me), but it was called off just in the nick of time and
negotiations were begun. By this time we had advanced a good deal
nearer to the Brittish barricade in Moore Street, and the charge
then would not have been quite so balaclava-like as the previous
ones
65.
After the surrender I was held back in Richmond Barracks
for about a week while all my fighting companions were shipped to
England. I do not know why I was held; what I do know is that
a big "G" man, on hearing my name, pounced on ins and handed me over
to some soldiers - probably mistook me for Joe. At the end of a
week I, too, was shipped to Stafford Jail, and later removed to
Frongoch. After about a month at Frongoch I is sent to Reading Jail,
where most of the "big fellows" were; that is, those who were interned,
as distinct from those who had been sentenced. I had been concerned
in an non-possumus strike against road-making in the camps unless paid
trade union wages!
We were released on Christmas Eve, 1916.
While in Reading Jail, Eamon O'Dwyer, from Ballagh, County
Tipperary, learning that I would not go back to Glasgow invited me to
Tipperary to help in reorganising the Volunteers then. By the way
T should like to add, even emphasise, I had made up my mind I'd never
leave Ireland again should I have to beg my bread, and I would
willingly sweep the streets. None of the Glasgow Battalion boys ever
tried to hide his identity in the camps. We had all previously
agreed among ourselves that when we would appear before the Sankey
Commission we would tell the chairman that we wanted neither mercy nor
anything else from him or his government, unless and except a rifle
in our hands and we'd find our own targets, no matter where we were,
be it at the front or rear. The bluff worked. True, the War Office
had had two years experience of the Glasgow "desperados", and I am
informed that the War Office sent word not to interfere with us. Not
one of us, then or ever after, was threatened with conscription, and
that fact itself lends colour to all I have said about the Glasgow
battalion. The London and Liverpool men were harried.
66.
The Glasgow Battalion got busy immediately the men began to
return home, and I had to handle some of the munitions brought over
here ear)y in 1917. I was living at this time (that is while
waiting until O'Dwyer was ready) with Joe O'Doherty, T.D. (2nd Dáil)
in Andy Clarkin's, Pearse StreetThenBunruick
I would like to
record that I spent the first fortnight after my release from Reading
with Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Griffith. My only comment on this is that
I never have and never will forget their kindness.
When I went to O'Dwyer's - about April, 1917 - I found almost
the whole population sympathetic. The Volunteers there were just
wild because the Rebellion had come and gone and nothing had happened
in proud Tipperary. What goaded the Volunteers more than anything
else was the parody on "The Soldier's Song which the British soldier
elements used sing on the least provocation - "Soldiers are we, who
nearly fought for Ireland". To their credit be it said, the
Volunteers saw the humour of it, felt it in fact, and were anxious
to redeem the implied stigma.
What astlenwii4 soil, what a glorious atmosphere to find
oneself in! I gave a talk on my own experiences in Easter Week in
the hail in Ballagh, and I declare that, when it was finished, the
crowd would have rushed at andstormed anything, anywhere with sticks.
No wonder we made great progress. Erom Ballagh to Dundrum and
Cashel, Volunteers flowed in. Similar work was going on
spontaneously in Tipperary town, where Treacy and Breen, Maurice
Crowe and the Barlowes were working like Trojans. Clonmel made
good progress, too. We had formed a battalion and were about to
get in touch with other areas to form a brigade when I was arrested
In May, l918. I was sentenced to six months in Belfast jail for
67.
drilling. Some of our cute boys maintained that I got, and
deserved, the six months for daring to sing "My Dark
Roserved" in the Court during the trial. We had a glorious fight
in Belfast Jail, which I enjoyed nearly as well as Easter Week.
While still in jail I heard that a convention had been held in
Tipperary to form a brigade. On my release in October I went to
Dublin. At the Plaza Hotel, Headquarters at the time, I met, or saw,
rather, Michael Collins, who was just going up the stairs when I
entered. "Oh, they let you out", said he. "Well, I am here anyway",
I answered. I was naturally anxious to know who had been chosen
Brigade 0/C. Not modesty, but the merest commonsense prevented me
thinking for one moment that there was the least chance that a stranger
like me would have been chosen to take charge of the newly formed
brigade. Mick told me that Mulcahy had just returned from the
Tionerary convention, and asked me had I heard the news. I told him
that I knew a convention had been held and was anxious to know who was
appointed O/C. "A fellow called Seumas Robinson", said he, grinning
at my stupefaction and walking on up the stairs. I confess I was
surprised, and was also pleased indeed. When I told Joe O'Doherty
the news he laughed: "Congratulations: you'll be one of the next
'16' Exxcutions!"
I had been in Dublin in Easter Week '16 and had determined that
the next tine Dublin or any other place started to fight at would not
be left to fight it out alone. I felt that I would not let the men
of Tipperarv down when the time came. I expect that the fact that I
had service in 1916 was as likely as not the reason why I was chosen.
It did not take me long to realise that the Volunteers would
have to be brought by gradual stages to the sticking point - I mean
68.
the bayonet-sticking point, and that nothing would be done by a
large body of Volunteers until a lead was given by a few. The
Volunteers were being arrested wholesale and without death-dealing
resistance, and they could feel that these arrests aid the attendant
hunger strikes were a direct challenge from the British. Our
difficultv was to take up that challenge in a clear and clean way
which would be unmistakable and would not be a mere flash in the pan,
or that would peter out in, say, the U.S.A. One could hardly get
a group of men to storm ato storm a barracks without some sort of a
declaration, or without permission from G.H.Q. And G.H.Q. would
not give permission before the whole country was ready, yet commonsense
dictated that when the whole country was ready they would probably all
be in jail. It was becoming increasingly difficult to keep proud
young men merely drilling and getting jailed or interned for it. It
was clear to me, too, that the pacifism of Sinn Fein was perceptibly
gaining round Most Volunteers would, I think, deny this, and even
give proofs of how Slim Fein was not attracting youth. However,
we know that the political end of the movement (had to be, in the
nature of things and under the circumstances) was becoming more
passive. A very vigorous sort of pacifism, if you like, but it was
certainly not a military force.
ELECTIOWS OF.1918.DETEEMINATION TO SET UP DAIL.
Here was a danger as far as the Volunteers were concerned.
We all heartily desired the formation of a Republican government, but
what I feared was that the Government, once formed, being our moral
superiors, a state of stalemate would be inevitable unless war was
begun before the Dáil could take over responsibility. Who could,
for example, expect a government situated as the Dáil would be ever
69.
to make a formal declarationof
mar? Physical, psychological, and
personal elements would be against this, for a moral certainty. The
Volunteers had no stomach for a war of attrition where they suffered
all and the enemy nothing, except in name: and a war of attrition only
it would be if active resistance was dependent on a declaration of war.
There had been a General Order in existence that we were to arm
ourselves by the use of force if necessary, but to shoot a policeman
or two merely to get their carbines, and then leave it at that by
running away, would bear too close a resemblance to murder to be
comfortable. The same could be held good if there were no plan to
continue, or if there were no reasonable hope of success. It occurred
to me that if one could only get the ball rolling before the Dáil met
then the Páilould not be so easily connected with what would be
regarded as a regrettable incident or two (which is what the beginning
of the Tan war was thought to be) and guerilla tactics might be begun
surreptitiously, developed imperceptibly, and seriously extended.
But how was a beginning to be made, and in time?
my mind was occupied with these thoughts when during the
Christmas of l938 Sean Treacy, my Vice O/C. came to O'Dwyer's with
his fiancée (Miss May Quigley) on an official visit. When tea was
over Treacv informed me that some geligriite was soon to be taken to
a quarry near Tipperary town He was not sure of the exact date,
and added that anything from two to six police would be guarding it.
Re wanted to know should we capture it. I said it would be something
bordering on treason not to try it. "Will you get permission from
G.H.Q.?" Sean asked. "No". "Why wont you?". "It is such a small
thing" I explained, "it might take weeks to get a reply (communications
were slow in those early days) we could not legitimately act until a
reply came back; after all, asking, for permission entails waiting for
70.
it; the despatch might get lost or captured and the gelignite might
cone and be used before a reply could be received".. "Then who will
take responsibility" asked Sean. I will; but on one condition:
that you keep me informed so that I may be there myself with a man or
two from my local Battalion here." We fell to discussing details.
Sean was to supply the scouts and four or five men. I was to bring
fled Reilly, flan1 O'Keeffe, Paddy Dwyer (Grub), Pat McCormack and Mick
Davoren. O'Keeffe, T3avoren and Reilly had farms to attend to and
could not remain the whole week night and day that we had to lie in
ambush. They were unlucky; it came off while they were away.
One thing special I laid down before Sean left for home: if the
poli cemen surrendered at once, we would have to accept their surrender;
if they did not, and shooting was resorted to, we must shoot to kill.
I feared if there were any shooting and one policeman escaped alive,
an if the British authorities failed to capture the men who actually
took part in the ambush, the live policeman would later probably swear
away some innocent life or lives. They did this after Knocklong.
Seán sent word about the second week in January, 1919. After
waiting in ambush about a week, during which we had to keep under cover
from everyone in the vicinity except certain close friend5 (we had to
eat sometimes) and during which we were nearly frozen stiff owing to a
very severe frost at. the time, and during which I was in a mental
ferment lest the Dáil should meet and we should get official cognisance
of it before the police arrived with the gelignite. Emulating Nelson
and his blind eye to the telescope I cut myself off from all longa
distance despatches and from newspapers so that I would not see any
official announcement of the setting up of the Dáil, Lefore the
gelignite arrived pt did arrive, and just in time - the day the Dáil
met for the first time. The police did try to fight. We took the
71.
gekugbute when it. was over, and Treacy, Preen, Hogan and my-self
went on the run.
I had a few things to straighten out first, including fixing
up methods of communication and contact, then I joined the other
three men in the mountains. We had no intention, however, of
remaining in the hills, or anywhere else. We had too much to do
getting around our brigade, trying to keep things going, and getting
men in every part of the area to scout for us. Soon we began to be
envied; the men wanted to be with us permanently.
Men were told to go on the run, and, rather than lose liberty
or arms, to he ready to fight for either. As these men increased
in numbers they were banded together. In the meantime Collins sent
for me. Seán Treacy and I went to Dublin, and Collins informed us
that he had arrangements almost completed to get us away to the U.S.A.
In less than two minutes Collins realised that we were not going to
America or anywhere away from Tipperary; that we had gone into this
with our eyes wide open, realising the consequences to the full, and
that we meant to keep the ball rolling; that we wouldn't have
started if we thought that that was to be the finish. Collins, to
his credit, was rather tickled at our attitude, and said that he
thought that we might want to et away. In fact, he "had been given
to understand that it was the thing to do, according to some people
(didn't say who these some people were), but that if that was the way
we looked on it", it was all right as far as he was concerned. I
think Preen and Treacy were very much upset because Collins didn't
us on the back literally. On the other hand, I had expected
something like this to happen, and therefore wasn't surprised.
I was rather pleased, in fact, with Collins's quick appreciation
72.
of the situation. I was pleased also because it gave us the
status I had hoped for - tacit, yet definite recognition, not
condemnation or censure from our legitimate superiors.
Shortly after our return to Tipperary from Dublin, Sean Hogan
was captured coming from a dance, to which he had gone without my
knowledge. The first thing that flashed through my mind was one of
young Hogan's dictums: "Ireland will never be free until she can
produce a Robert Emmet who doesn't care a damn about women". His
going indicated that he did not believe Ireland was capable of
producing any such thing. He had gone to the dance with a very
pretty girl. Paddy Kinane announced the news to the remaining three
of us in O'Keeffe's, Glenough.
Now, there had been a gentleman's understanding, never spoken,
but as clearly understood as if it had been an oath, that we would all
four stand or fall together. There was no doubt that we would rescue
Hogan, or pass out for good, but we also wanted to do it to the best
advantage, that is, with a clean getaway. Sean was even jocose about
the sensation the release would cause. First we thought of getting
a motor and rushing the barracks at once. This would be feasible as
long as they did not know who the prisoner was. Klnane was able to
tell us they didn't know yet who Hogan was, but that policemen were on
their way from Tipperary to identify the prisoner. Before we could
et into Thurles they would know who he was and be well prepared. We
sat down to reason out the whole problem. I enquired what was the
routine for dealing with ordinary criminals taken to Thurles. Hogan
could be taken either to Dublin, Cork, or Tipperary town. If he were
taken to Dublin we could there organise a fairly large force and storm
-the Court (I knew my Dublin men). If he were brought to Tipperary
town, it would be a relatively simple matter, but if to Cork (that was
73.
terra incognita) - well he must not be allowed to reach it. Treacy
being Vice O/C. (i/c. of Organisation) and knowing everybody, was
deputed to send off the despatches. Scouts were got moving in Thurles
to keep us posted, and we had only to decide whether we would make the
attempt to release Hogan at Emly or Knocklong; that is, we would
attack the train if he did not change at Limerick Junction for
Tipperary town. By the way, had Hogan not been on the train he came
on, we would possibly never have released him. The local East
Limerick boys who had been called in to help were so enthusiastic that
they were on the station, contrary to my urgent warning, before we
could get confirmation of Hogan's presence on the train. However, he
was there all right. The release was a near thing tho'. Sergeant
Wallace was killed; so wasCraheleCharlie Enright and Constable O'Reilly wasA
stunnedand
in the melee his carbine slipped unseen out of sight under the
seat. O'Reilly came-to (or had been playing 'possum!'), picked up his
rifle, and fired down the station at the retreating crowd. Sean Treacy
was shot through the neck by Wallace during a hand to hand struggle;
Breen was shot under the left shoulder by O'Reilly, who also slightly
wounded Ned O'Brien and Scanlon. Young Hogan's handcuffs were removed.
We pot scattered. Sean had got out on the far side of the train and
was not to be seen. Dan had to be hurried off to get medical
attention; Hogan went with him. I had to remain until the train left
the station before I could be sure Sean had got away. That took about
twenty minutes. By an extraordinary coincidence, or so it would seem,
we all made separately for the same house at the foot of the Galtees -
Foley's. One of the Foley boys was hanged later for this, though he
took no part in the actual release. This, roughly, is the story of
Knocklong.
74.
I had a month of very anxious days and nights nursing Dan and
Sean back to health. They had to be removed from the district,
though it was unsafe to shift flan at all, he was so dangerously ill
from loss of blood. However, the Limerick boys turned up trumps,
got a car, and we got by stages to the Clare side of the Shannon.
Cleaning living boys, Sean and Dan got well rapidly, and young
Hogan never lost his nerve for a moment. Hogan stood by my side,
bomb in hand, pin out, to defend Sean and Dan the night we left East
Limerick for West limerick. We did not know a motor car was coming
that night to take us, and we thought it was one of the military and
police cars that were passing the main road every few minutes. Just
in time, Volunteers, advancing down the road, stopped the car and found
they were friends they were expecting.
The rest of my story is, if possible, still more completely
merged in the Brigade. When anything big was on, I tried to be there,
such as in the attacks on barracks or troop trains. I was on the
roof at the destruction of Hollyford barracks with Ernie O'Malley, and
on the roof at the capture of Drangan barracks with Sean Treacy. Both
these fights lasted about six hours. But when Sean was killed in
Talbot Street, Dublin, I found it a wholetime job to attend to the
organisation (which was Treacy's work as Vice O/C) of the Brigade and
the activities of the Columns from a centre which, though constantly
raided, had to continue to carry on as a co-ordinating point. This
needs no elaboration.
By '21 we had the area cleared of all small enemy posts, and the
large columns became cumbersome, so I decided to break up the columns
into Battalion columns so that a greater amount of smaller activities
could take place. The smaller the target we presented to the enemy
the safer for us. Big operations were impossible and dangerous and
what the enemy would have liked.
75.
The principal reason for the dug-out policy was that it was
unfair to the harrassed civil population, whom it was our duty to
protect and comfort, to have armed men in their homes who were
determined if trapped in the house, to fight their way out. It was
very nerve-racking to civilians to have us sleeping under their
roofs, especially if there were children, and be left holding the
"babies.
Early in 1921 Liam Lynch asked me to go to a meeting in Cork to
discuss the pros and cons of co-operation among Brigades. The Cork
delega4es, including Liam Lynch, insisted that I he Chairman of the
meeting. Con Moloney, my Adjutant, was asked to act as Secretary,
and within an hour we had the headings for a report to G.H.Q. This
would be, I should think, January-February, '21. The reason for
getting a bigger commandwas the fact that the enemy posts were now
all large ones in the two areas which later became 1st and 2nd
Southern Divisions. G.H.Q. turned down our suggestion, but later
adopted it, but they divided the area into two and put Ernie O'Malley
O/C. of our Division. This was about April or May, 1921. The
nomination of officers was a new departure.
In 1921 the Volunteers asked me to stand for election to the
Secibd Dai1, and I was elected for East Tipperary and Waterford in
the place of the late Pierce McCann.
Came the Truce. The Treaty. I spoke and voted against it.
Came the first split in the Army; then when O'Malley was called to
Dublin I was elected by the Brigades to the Division on the suggestion
from Dublin. The Pact: I was keen on it. The Four Courts: I
represented C.H.Q. on the actual taking over, with Sean Fitzpatrick's
South Tipperary Column and members of Dublin Brigade. I remained in
76.
the Court. constantly, day and night, for a week. The Kilkenny
and Limerick incidents brought about by the "Staters" not keeping
their bargain to allow the local Volunteers, by majority, to take over
vacated barracks. O'Malley can's down to help uphold the honour of
his old Division. Lost my seat at the "Pact" elections. Attack on
the Four Courts. left the Courts at midnight on the 27th of June,
after a whale of an argument with Main Mellows and Rory O'Connor on
the foolishness of the Headquarters of the Army having all its. eggs in
the one basket. Escaped out of the city on the afternoon of the 28th.
Met Sear, McSweeney and Liam Lynch on the train leaving for the South.
teamed of the meeting in the Clarence and was delighted - this the
morning of the attack on Four Courts, June 28th.
All the way down until we separated outside Kilkenny City (which
Ham Lynch would try to go through and got captured, but which we -
Sean Hans, T.D. Mick Burke and I - avoided) we debated almost to
argument the foolishness, as I thought it, of the policy of each Unit
staying home in its own area and having a "bump off of them".
Father Lynch (Liam's brother) was in Clonmel when Liam arrived
there later. He was witness, without knowing what it was all about,
to my despairing effort to get Liam to commandthe whole Army, to march
on Dublin and cut out the cancer before it spread. Couldn't move
Lynch. I didn't want another split, so I resigned. Lynch wouldn't
hear of it. I told him how it felt in Easter Week when the country
did not come to our aid; I explained that before I left I sent word to
Traynor that my Division would be rushed to Dublin, and that I had to
keep my word At the time I thought Lynch believed it would be too
difficult to get to Dublin, and, as an inspiration, the idea came to me:
if we sent a hundred men to Dublin to establish contact (and I had not
77.
the slightest doubt it could be easily done in the first two days)
and when Lynch would see how easily it was done, I had hoped he would
change his policy. He agreed to let a hundred men go, and he got
me to withdraw my resignation. They went. Did good work. I
believe the "Staters" were almost as afraid of the Tipperary men
coming to Dublin as if they were the Ghurkas. The line-fighting.
The River Suir with a rood road on the north, and south sides, and a
railway, all running parallel, was an ideal position for fighting on
interior lines.
With about five hundred rifles we held that line for weeks.
It was never broken. The "Staters" passed on beyond us on both our
flanks, wiped up the First Southern Division, and they were at
Mitchelstown in our rear before the order was given to break up into
Columns and harry the enemy with guerilla tactics.
Mr. de Valera was with me (perhaps it would be better to say I
was with him!) during the hottest part of the fighting, and had he
had charge of the whole Army he would have turned the scales. But,
the "have a bump off of them in your own area" style of Field General
Headquarters would put the caoi bois on Napoleon himself.
After this the war was one of attrition, which at best could be
Indecisive only. Yet we held on, hoping against hope that someone
in some other area, not so worn out as we were, would plead with
the new Republican G.H.Q. and change our military police. I am
convinced that even two months after the break up of our lines in
August, had the Army been organised from Dublin in one last
concerted attack on the enemy citadel - Dublin - -we could have
brought the war to a close, one way or other. That would have been
more generous to the country, and probably we would have been
successful. However, no use weeping over lost opportunities.
78.
I felt it would never be attempted - because Dublin was shellshocked
by the loss of the Four Courts and for the second time in
six years Dublin was let down at a critical moment by the rest of
the country.
Our Tipperary men came back to us when they saw the Dublin
Officers would not contemplate a march on Dublin with such
infinestimal help from outside.
Perhaps one of the most interesting things about this post linefighting
with us was the fact that we managed not only to establish
a stationary permanent central Headquarters for the Division, but we
even ran a weekly newspaper, "Chun an Lae", with flora O'Keeffe as our
Director of Publicity, from a foolproof dugout at Maher's of
Blackcastle. The weekly became known as "Tune and Lay". I wrote
the first leading article to indicate our policy. After that it was
in flora's and Sean Fitzpatrick's hands ......
DATE:
SIGNED: Seumas Robinson
Date: 16th Sep 1957
WITNESS:T O'Gorman
APPENDICES.
1. Letter to Irish Press (refs. to page 4). Refused publication7/6/'49.
11. Letter to Irish Press (refs. to page 4). Refused publication.
III. Letter to Sunday Press May 1953. Refused publication.Ref's. pane 4.
TV. Letter to Sunday Press L7/3/'54. Refused publicationRef's. page 4.
V. Letter to Maior O'Donoghue. Ref's. Page 31, (formation ofI.R.A. Divisions) and Liam Lynch. 3/3/'55.
VT. Major O'Donoghue's reply to above. 5/3/53.
VII. My reply to Major O'Donoghue's letter of 5/3/53.
VIII. Letter trom Malor F. O'Donoghue in reference to "Spy O'Neill".17/4/'53.
Ix. My reply to above. 21st April 1955,
X. Major O'Donoghue's acknowledgment of above. 27/4/'53.
XI. Letter to Rt. Rev. Dom Benignus Hicke', Abbot, Mellifont, togetherwith a letter to Sean Fitzpatrick, Adjutant, 2nd SouthernDivision, and a letter to the Secretary, Soloheadbeg Memorial -
April 1953.
XII. Letter published by Irish Times, 6/2/'52. Refs. page 20.
XTTT. Letter: reference to Sean Hogan for Military Service PensionsBoard, September '35, para. I, page 46.
XIV. Article published in Evening Telegraph on the Ashtown Ambush(attack on Lord French) page 50.
XV.General Order No. 15. Page 52,
XVI. Letter from me to Dan Breen, Brigade Q.M.; left behind inFernside. 26/9/20. page 56.
No. I. Talk delivered on the Radio Train onSoloheadbeg-Knocklong,
12/9/50.
auderdion he I
A Talk by Mr. SEUMASROBINSON, delivered on invitation
and broadcast on the Radio Train, on Sunday, 12th September,1950
Go mbeannuigh Dia agus Mhuire a mhathar naomhtha Bean Rioghean
na Érreann, dibh ulaig.
By way of introduction I may say that I've been asked to say
something today because I was at one time the O/C. of the 2nd Southern
Division :- the area through which we are now passing. It comprised
all County Kilkenny, two Brigades in County Tipperary, two Brigades in
County Limerick, and, during the Civil War ail County Waterford.
Now I look upon it as a very great compliment indeed to be invited
to say a word to Dublin Brigade men - but I feel a bit uncomfortable and
diffident about it, because it pits me in the position of a past pupil
being asked to address his old teachers - the men who taught him as a
pupil nearly all he knows, and who put h5w on the way to whatever
success he had achieved.
There is an old saw about comparisons being odious. That maxim
like most of those old sayings is not completely waterproof:, after all
what could anyone do to form any judgment on anything except, on or by
comparisons? At the moment I'm concerned about comparing certain
honours that were at different times 'thrust upon me', and I ant doing
this so that, by means of comparing these honours with my membership of
the Dublin Brigade, I may be able to compliment in excelsis the now
much too modest Dublin Brigade man
According to ordinary human standards the highest honours I've
received are: (a) I was asked by the Volunteers to stand for T.D. ship
to the Second Dail. (b) I was appointed O/C., 2nd Southern Division;
(t) and Ihad
been, earlier, elected by a
3.
(at Enniscorthy and Ferns) - by the Kents in Cork, by
Nick O'Callaghan - on his own and alone in Tipperary - and also
by the men from the North (from Louth and Belfast), who crossed
the Boyne and marched under great difficulties and dangers - and not
without having to shoot (at Castlebellingham), marched to the relief
of Dublin, yes, and succeeded n reaching their rendezvous and
sending in word to the G.P.O. that they had arrived on schedule and
were ready for their next allocation. Perhaps, the most interesting
point about that great march, (remember they were the only body of
men who succeeded in carrying out their original Easter Week orders
to the letter) at this moment as we are passing through Knocklong
in Fast Limerick is the fact that these men from the North were led,
and ably led by an East Limerick man - Commandant General Donal.
O'Hannigan. (I wonder is he on the train today),
All that I would claim for Soloheadbeg-Knocklong is that it
initiated a new phase, or rather re-started the Easter Week Rising
where it left off The plan for Easter Week after the intended
evacuation of Dublin was to be guerilla tactics on a grand scale.
Soloheadbeg-Knocklong merely started those tactics on a modest scale,
involving no one but ourselves. It was lucky for us that at that
tint the whole Army was like a network of compressed high-explosive
mines; and we are thankful that the fates chose us to be, I think,
the battery that set off the first explosion of the chain of
explosions all over Ireland that blasted the way to the Truce.
Perhaps I'm talking too long and I'd better close with a word
in praise of the men who rescued Sean Hogan at Knocklong (we have
lust passed thro' the station of Knocklong), especially the young
East Limerick Brigade. They deserve great credit; first, because
it was to them fell the greater part of the brunt of the actual
4.
attack on the train; second, because, being as they were, ail
intelligent young fellows, they were fully alive to the risks they
ran.. risks physical and metaphysical - or moral. These
young men were not the sort who were out merely for excitement or
daredeviltry or fun: they knew all the possible and probable
consequences of their action. Thirdly, because not a single one of
these men (whether from Tipperarv or Limerick) who were concerned in
the rescue at Knocklong had been under fire before, not even at
Soloheadbeg, for there the police had failed in their efforts to fire.
For inexperienced young fellows to rush four seasoned, hard-bitten,
well-trained, alert R.I.C. men, killing two of them, knocking out one
of them - the fourth fled, and snatching away their prisoner took some
courage, especially in those very early days when the British forces
seemed invincible, arid at a time when the British had just come out
of their greatest war in history, intoxicated with success and no one
in an the world to fight or fear - except the untrained,
inexperienced, ill-equipped and, as yet, not fully organised I.R.A.
and which had been beaten militarily
onlyabout three years previously.
I feel I have been talking too long and I'm probably spoiling
the enjoyment of this pleasant trip to Cork. So may I now, before
I finish, try to express my appreciation and thanks (and I'm sure I
speak for all those on the train) to our announcer Seán Dowling,
O/C., the 4th Battalion, Dublin Brigade, for the splendid
entertainment and instructive talks he has given us. Unlike me,
Seán fowling is always worth listening to! But I want my very last
words to be (and no one will appreciate this better than Seán fowling)
I want my last word to be the defiant shout that went up after Easter
Week 1916 all over Ireland arid ail over the world where Irishmen and
women dwelt after Easter Week 1916: "Up Dublin!"
Appendix No. Iis Highfield Road,Rathgar,DUBLIN.
June 7. 1949
Editor,"Irish Press"
Refused publication by the Editor
A Chara,
In your issue, of May 10, 11, 13, and 14, you published extracts
from Mr. John McCann's book "War By The Irish" in which my name is
mentioned a number of times.
As sufficient time has n elapsed to allow the original thrill, the
thrill of Mr. McCann's stories of the Soloheadbeg, Knocklong and
"Ferneide" affairs, to settle down, may I make one or two remarks?
As I was the Brigade Commandant from the formation of South (3rd)
Tipperary Brigade in October 1915, until about 3 months before the
outbreak of the Civil War in June 28th. 1922, surely I should be
consulted by those who set out to write an authentic account of these
episodes. Therefore, I should like to put on record that neither
Mr. McCann nor those others, except Mr. Desmond Ryan, who have written
on these historic happenings, have sought information from me.
Incidentally, I would like to mention that the Commemoration
Programme, issued in connection with the Presentations made to the
survivors of the Knocklong Rescue, contains a number of mistakes.
Some of these were, naturally, quite accidental, but I wonder was it an
accidental mistake not to mention my rank anywhere in the Programme,
while every other officer of the Briade Staff had a rank attached to him.
Of the other 3 members of the staff mentioned in the context of the
Programme only one rank is given correctly, namely Sean Tracey "Vice
Commandant". Of the two others, one, Penis Lacey, is wrongly named
Brigade Commandant from April 1921. The truth is that I (being
Divisional Commandant at the time) appointed Penis Lacey to succeed me
2.
in about April 1922; the other, Dan Breen is given no rank
officially by the compilers of the Programme, but they publish
a portrait of Breen taken from the "Hue and Cry" which statesa
wrong other things "Cans himself Commandant of South Tipperary
Brigade". Yet the compilers of the Programme were aware that
Dan Breen's rank was that of Quartermaster.
Mise, le meas,
on
Appendix No. 2
Refused Publication in "Irish press".
The Editor,"Irish Press".
A Chara,
Would you kindly allow a space to make a few remarks on
Mr. Healy's eulogy in prose appearing in your issue of 12th inst.
on Mr. Dan Breen, T.D.?
Many people, especially in Tipp., in blissful (?) ignorance of
the whole truth will have got copies to treasure as trilling,
authentic history, redounding to the glory of Tipp; yet every officer
in Tipp., living and dead knows that Mr. Healy's panegyric is
bolstering what will one day be surely known as "The great hoax of
Tipperary." Little blame can attach to Mr. Healy.
Why doesn't some Tipperary officer or group of them, prick this
bubble that has been flying aloft for the last 30 years and redeem
Tipp's good name?
Let truth prevail.
(1) It was Mrs. Seamus O'Doherty who wrote "My fight forIrish Freedom" ask her.
(2) Dan Breen was never elected Brigade O/C. He was electedQuartermaster only. Ask Gen. Rd. Mulcahy, chairmanat the Volunteer convention held in Oct. 1918 to formthe Brigade.
(3) Dan Breen was never in charge of an organised fight duringthe whole of the Tan war. Ask anyone who is a firsthand
authority.
(4) Dan Breen was not even present at the capture of Dranganbarracks or Hollyford Barracks much less "one of thegroup in charge" or "The men who were with me" ...an insult to intelligence and the Irish RepublicanArmy alike. Ask anyone who was there.
/(5)
2.
(5) Dan Breen received only two bullet wounds in theRepublican Army
(a) At Knocklong, below the collar-bone.
(b) Thro' the calf of the leg at Azhtown.
At Fernside he received cuts only from the brokenglass of the green-house. Doctor Alice Barry andcertain Cummanna mBan girls attended him. Or askthe Brigadier who came to Dublin specially toenquire into the matter.
(6) Where in Ireland could, or rather did Dan Breen geta bayonet wound'
(7) With the exception of the last two innocuousparagraohs there are holes to be picked in each ofthe other twenty six.
() I nearly forgot Sologheadbeg. Seamus Robinson,theBrigade 0/C., was In charge. Dan Breen was noteven second in conimand.
Signed:(Mrs.) Kathleen Kincead,
(n& Keating)
-V
Appendix No. 3
18 Highfield Road,Dublin.
May, 1953.Wothulloped
A Chara,
May I make a few remarks about your serial, "No Other law" by
F. O'Donoghue?
I have no intention of criticising, nor have I any desire, nor is
there any need to criticise the text.
Florrie O'Donoghue is so meticulous in recording that he will not
record anything that he has not got something tangible aback of it. The
unavoidable difficulty here is, I imagine, that it would be impracticable
and almost impossible to include all the relevant factors in most cases
where policy is involved.
But it is about some of the pictorial illustrations appearing in
the Sunday Press, arid which will naturally be associated popularly with the
context of the book, that I wish to say a word. These photos are,
sometimes, irrelevant to the context and, what is more, at variance with
truth. Statistics, with judicious or injudicious handling can so easily
be made the superlative of lies.
I hope these illustrations are not all part of the book itself - at
least under their present captions. Some of the illustrations are
obviously deceptive (up to a point - though not on the part of the Sunday
Press) and the captions occasionally spoil whatever historic value they
would otherwise possess.
For example, in last week's Sunday Press one photograph, apparently
a purporting to show men on active service, depicts such sartorial
perfection that anyone who had been 'out" in those days would smile and
ask, "Are these officers or gentlemen"
2.
Obviously this photograph was a Truce-time production and could
have its own historic value if it purported to illustrate the
difference in "make-up" between war-time and truce-time fashions -
between Hollywood "stills" and the real thing.
Had some of the photographs I've seen lately been brought to my
notice while we were at war, I would have regarded them as matter for
courtmartial, or severe censure and confiscation. They were god-sends
to the Hue and Cry.
May I ask is the book written mo5tly about Liam Lynch and Cork,
or about an officer who was eleventh in precedence in another county
and brigade? Whose photograph has appeared most often in your
illustrations of the book' What book is, in fact, getting the greater
share of Sunday press illustrative propaganda?
And may I ask, also, what constitutes a "Southern Leader" as
distinct from a leader anywhere else?
Seán Moylan, whose photograph is included in last week's issue of
Sunday Press could and should be described as a 'Southern Leader".
He had been in charge of a fighting Column. He became a Brigade O/C.,
and later a Divisional O/C. He was also a member of the Volunteer
Executive. He succeeded Main Lynch in the Brigade. Therefore, his
photograph and the title of "leader" are relative to both the book and
historic truth.
But a mar. who had spent, at most, about three weeks during the
period from July 1919 to December 1920 in the South, and who was never
called on to lead an organised fight, much less to organise one
during the whole of the Tan war, should not be termed a "Southern
Leader" merely because he may be a fellow country man, or because he
3.
belongs to a certain political party.
In conclusion, and apparently apropos of nothing at all:
has generosity, not to say gratitude, died in South Tipperary
thirty years If so, I wasn't even invited to the funeral.
Mise, le meas,
(Signed) Seumas Robinson.
The Editor,Sunday Press.
appendix No. IV
Editor,Sunday Press.
A Chara,
In your issue of the Sunday Press of the 28th February, 1954,
I noticed with pleasure and a good deal of pleasant surprise, that the
name "Seumas Robinson" was at last mentioned as being the "most
notable".
It was the Volunteers of Scotland, however, who had not forgotten
him. I happen to know that Seumas Robinson was quite upset at your
correspondent singling him out as "the most notable" when Scotland's
own Division had its own "big shots": his brother Joe was G.O.C. in
Scotland with the same rank as his brother Seumas, that is, Commandant
General of a Division and Seamus Reader who succeeded Joe Robinson
as Brigadier were not mentioned. Seamus Reader reached top rank in
the I.R.R. though he was then only a lad in his teens. Reader was
the most active and the most effective Officer in Scotland - especially
when the older Officers were in gaol.
The fighting men of Dublin, too, remember Seumas Robinson. They
remember that he caine over from Scotland with 50 or 60 other young men
to fight by the side of the Dublin Brigade in Easter Week 1916. There
are men in Dublin who remember that Seumas Robinson was put in charge
of the farthest outpost from G.H.Q., that is, nearest the enemy, in
Hopkins & Hopkins at O'Connell Bridge. They can remember he was twice
promoted on the field in that glorious week: from Volunteer to Section
Commander and almost immediately after to 1st lieutenant to Captain
Pedar Brackin, O/C., No. 2. Company, Kimmage Garrison. This No. 2.
Company was formed on the eve of the Rising. George Plunkett was in
general charge of the Kimmage Garrison from its formation towards the
end of 1915. The Carrison was known as the Standing Army or "Shock
Troops" of G.H.Q., before and during Easter Week.
2.
The block of buildings in which Hopkins & Hopkins was situated
was the last outpost to be vacated on Friday morning. All other
outposts between it and the G.P.C. had been vacated earlier in the
week under heavy gun-fire; but the Hopkins & Hopkins block of
buildingsheld out until it became a mass of flames.
Seumas Robinson had won his spurs long before Soloheadbeg,
Knocklong, Hollyford, Drangan, Ashtown etc. He went down to
Tipperary to make sure that at least the great fighting men of
Tipperary, would have one man who would see to it that Dublin would not
be let down again by timid or hide-bound British Army Text-book
trained officers in the country.
There are men and women in Dublin today who remember discussing
with Seumas Robinson months before he went to Tipperary, ways and
means of re-starting the fight along the lines that he started at
Sologheadbeg.
In "My. Fight for Trish Freedom" we read "the men who were with
me (under Me? - Dan Preen) had no previous experience of fighting".
There is also the suggestion by foreshadowing in retrospect, his
(Breen's) democratic election" as Brigade Commandant, This
sugge8tion is clearly a calculated deception worthy only of a woman
(god forgive me) with an axe to grind. And Dan Preen must also have
known that his Commanding Officer was "democratically elected" his
Commanding Officer for no other reason than that he had previous
fighting experience in Easter Week 1916, and had training in Kimmage
Garrison. Seumas Robinson had also studied tactics and manoeuvres
in Reading Caol under the late Ginger O'Connell, a Colonel of the
U.S. Army. Michael Brennan, O/C., 1st Western Division, is witness to
that as he was chairman to one side in sham battles - on paper;
3
and Michael Davern, T.D., and Jerome Davin, O/C. Battalion I.
(Battalion, Brigade, and Divisional Headquarters were situated in
his father's farm) could if they wish vouch for most of what I have
said, from different angles.
I have said that the Volunteers of Scotland and of Dublin have
not forgotten Seumas Robinson. But the men of South Tipperary seem
to have forgotten him, or, what is worse, ignored him. Why?
Surely it could not be, that, because Seumas Robinson hails from the
same part of Ireland as Sean an Daoimhis, Roger Casement, Jimmy Hope,
Henry Joy McCracken, Willie Orr, General Monroe, Betsy Gray,
Joe McKelvie and many others, Tipperary men are ashamed to acknowledge
Seumas Robinson as the man solely responsible for starting "the racket"
at Sologheadbeg and leading South Tipperary all through the long
fighting: that Seumas Robinson was the originating and directing brain
behind the fight in South Tipperary.
The young people of Tipp. seem not to have heard of Seumas
Robinson judging by "Coffey's Forge'?. "Coffey's Forge" may not be
young in years hut his letter "sounds" kiddish to anyone who knows
more about Sologheadbeg than he seems to know. He, or she, mentions
the names of three Tipperary men only, as if they were not only the
most important names but the only ones worth mentioning. Another
thing that makes me think "Coffey's Forge" is young, or at least
youngish is that he actually mentions the name of Sean Hogan. Now he
should know that the spirit behind the suppression of real truth
especially in the 4th Battalion area of Tipperary, treats Seán Hogan
as only a sort of mascot instead of a Column leader second to none in
South Tipperary during the Tan War. Humorously enough Sean Hogan's
Column was known as The Second Brigade Column. Dinny Lacey and
4.
Sean Hogan were the only two Brigade Column Leaders ever appointed
by Seumas Robinson during the Tan War; all other claims are
spurious.
Anyone anything to say about that?
I have been making such startling statements (startling only
to those kept in ignorance of the truth) that it behoves me to state
my own authority. Well, here it is for what it is worth.
During the years 1916 to 1923 I was a very young girl; too
young to take an active part in militant activities like my elder
sisters. But my home was the storied "71" Heytesbury Street.
I say "storied" because it is mentioned in every book dealing with
the stories (I hesitate to call them histories) of South Tipperary
Brigade.
"71" was the recognised Dublin Headquarters or "Centre" of
South Tipperary Prigade, and later of the 2nd Southern Division. It
was a meeting place for private discussions on policy and action to
he suggested to G.H.Q. Oscar Traynor, Ernie O'Malley, Peadar
O'Donnell, Seán McBride are a few of the living men who were present
at some of these meetings. There were so many meetings, and names
were seldom mentioned and excitement ran so high that I cannot at the
moment remember all the other living witnesses to these important
meetings. I would be grateful for any reliable information on this
or any other aspect of "71". But please write me; I am a busy
housewife.
In "71" I met or saw and heard nearly everyone of the real
fighting men whose names have been appearing in your paper for months
past: Liam Mellows (my elder sister did secretarial work for him),
7
5.
Liam Lvnch, who was nursed through two illnesses in our house,
Joe McKelvie, who left Heytesbury Street with Seumas Robinson in
my mother's car to reconnitre the buildings in Dublin (with
G.H.Q., Beggars Bush, tacit consent) to decide on what buildings
to take over as a General Headquarters; the taking over of the
Four Courts was the result; Ernie O'Malley (countless times),
Oscar Traynor, George and Count Plunkett, Seán McBride, Irish Citizen
Army men like Dick McCormack (who brought rifles and large supplies
of Parabellum "stuff"), Bob de (Dour, Roddy Connolly and Frank Murray,
the Brennans of Clare, officers and couriers from the 1st Southern
Division - Tam Deasy, George Power and, I think, Tadg Byrne, and
P.I. Ruttledge, Richard Mulcahy, Harry Boland and Michael Collins,
all visited "71". There was a continuous stream of callers, never
empty-handed, from Scotland with munitions, and dozens and dozens (no
exaggeration) of South Tipperary officers and men. "The Big Four"
were constantlycallingand staying there: Seán Treacy left "71" to to
his heroic death; Seán Hogan, Denis Lacey, Paddy McDonagh etc.
Dan Breen, whose duty as Quartermaster, kept him in Dublin almost
permanently, knows "71"; Robert Briscoe, T.D., will tell anyone,
I feel sure, that when he rushed back from the continent where he
had been sent to get munitions, knew that whatever place or
whosoever was, or was not, on the right side on the outbreak of the
Civil War, it would be safe to call first at "71".
It is a disconcerting commentary, that, while the crisis of
actual warfare continued between l9l8 and 1923 the officers and men
of South Tipperary Brigade did not hesitate to select Seumas
Robinson to be their Commanding Officer; nor, when the 1920
Elections for the Second Dáil were mooted, did they even suggest
that anyone other than Seumas Robinson should represent them and the
6.
constituents of East Tipperary. Seumas Robinson stood loyally by
the "Pact" in the following elections of 1922.
Arid did not a certain other person well known to you, Sir, and
who has bourgeonned on another man's soil, break that "Pact" which
had been given the force of law by the Second Dáil, and approved by
the unanimous decision of the Sinn Féin Convention, by putting
himself forward "for both sides" as was said humorously at the time,
but certainly he was not put forward by those who voted against the
Articles of Agreement, illegally signed in London by Ireland's
representatives who were not absolute Plenipotentiaries?
Now, Sir, we have had one "fake" Michael Collins in our
generation. Heavens, let us not tolerate another! I hasten to
explain that I do not wish to cast aspersion on the real Michael
Collins, but the British newspaper - manufactured "Mick Collins",
whom they de appear to be not only omniscient but omnipresent in
all parts of Ireland physically leading ambushes and columns from
Dublin to West Cork. The real Nick Collins was great beyond
controversy - at least from 1915 to 1921 - but the British paper
manufactured "hayro" (copied by the Irish press of the time without
comment) influenced a minority of Republicans to swallow their oath
to the Republic and to become bed-fellows of all the Free Masonic,
the anti-national, anti-Catholic, anti-everything-Irish elements in
the country. Is it not astonishing to see all these diversified
elements still taking, seemingly, a sardonic delight in seeing their
"ideals" stretched or mutilated or smelted in their communal
Procrustean sarcophagus'
It took ten years for a minority of the minority who fell away
from the Republic, to realise that they had been deceived and to
7.
return to their old allegiance to the real Republic. Surely this
is an obvious observation: disruptive elements, who are always
ready to settle their consciences (with a hatchet?), are forever
open to a remunerative compromise.
Now let us suppose ('tho' it is, I'm afraid, more than a
supposition at the moment) that Dominion Home Rule for all Ireland
is, or is soon to be, on the tapis as the "fdeal solution of
Partition" (God help us); then it does not, or will not, require
clairvoyance to foretell who is, or is likely to be Britain's and
her Irish Procrusteans' (cut and dressed to a nicety) next paper
manufactured "hayro". Disruptive elements the world over are
past-masters in propaganda. And we will hear again, as soon as the
opportunity is opportune: "What is good enough for our greatest
"havro" is good enough for me", as the variant of the 1921/23
Catch-cry for the unwary.
Fantastic 37 I hope so.
If any of your readers want. to cross swords with me on aw
statement I have made or any inference I have drawn, let him or her
or them, give his or her or their, name or na1is and their authority
and I'll meet him, or her or them at Phillipi.
I have written all this only to show the weight behind my own
evidence. I was young, but, with the deepest respect I can say that
I, "kept all these things pondering them in my heart". And I know
with all human certainty that Seumas Robinson was recognised by all
during all. those years between 1918 and 1923 as the authority, the
beginning, the driving force and the brain behind Soloheadbeg and
all that."Signed: Kathleen Kincaid.
Mrs. Kathleen Kincaid (née Keating)
22, Sundrive Park,Kimmage, Dublin.
SR
Iv
22, Sundrive Park,
Kimmage.
17/3/54.
Dear Mr. Editor,
The enclosed letter is not mere news: it is history.
Please publish it in full. If you cannot see your way to do
so, could you kindly state your reason or reasons,
& oblige,
Yours sincerely,
(Signed) Kathleen Kincaid.
The Editor thanks you for your letter,
which he has read with interest. He regrets
that, owing to pressure on space, it has not
been practicable to publish it in the SUNDAY
PRESS.
APPENDIX TN Iv Kovley
The Editor,Sunday Press,Burgh Quay,Dublin.
Dear Mr. Feehan,
As you see, I have learned your name. I have also learned
that you are a South Tipperary man from Clonmel.
I met many men and some women from Clonmel in the old days in
"71"; but I never heard of you. You must have been as young as
myself then - too young to do anything. I remember Frank Drohan,
Bill Myles (Editor of The rationalist), Sean Cooney and his sisters,
O'Keeffe and O'Gormanand Mick Lambe who was brought, wounded stun
bleeding arid semi-conscious, and literally "dumped" in "71", because
they knew no other place to bring him. Many Column men, despatchriders
arid others from Clonmel called and were housed and fed in "71"
My family and I surely have a claim on every "Clonmellion". What do
you say?
Your refusal to print my letter surprised me. I 'phoned my
brother-in-law Seumas Robinson. He, too, was surprised - at me
being surprised. He nurmured something about "Truth in a noose
when it cones to trying to get any Tipperary man to expose the 'Great
Tipperary Hoax'. No Tipperary man can be expected to espouse my
fight for Irish freedom" he said. "But, didn't Dan Breen write that?"
I asked. "No, it was Mrs. Seamus O'Doherty who wrote 'My Fight for
Irish Freedom' and the Sunday Press is anxious to expose it - for
sale".
You say you can't publish my letter because of lack of space
Shades and rattling chains of "Coffey's Forge" and other annonymitles.
Please return my typescript, and,Oblige,
Yours faithfully,
(Kathleen Kincaid).
27/3/'54
18 Highfield Road,Dublin.
3.3.'53.
Major F. O'Donoghue,Cork.
My dear F.,
The enclosed may or may not interest you. It is an extract
from my manuscript notes for, perhaps, a book - certainly for a
statement.
These notes have been written at odd moments as inspiration
or desperation or "ennui" moved me during the last decade or so.
Dove-tailing them is my present nightmare. They are wild oats sown
at broadcast and the harvest may not be worth gathering.
Best regards.
(Intld.) S.R.
I. R. A. DIVISIONS.
I postulate that the germ of the idea of forming the Army into
large divisions arose incidentally to, and developed subsequently
during a "dispute" between Brigadier ham Lynch of Cork 2 (North) and the
O/C. of Tipperary 3 (South) Brigade.
Early in October, 1920 (as the war was rapidly rising to a crescendo
of violence and the British were systematically bringing to perfection
their tactics of sudden mass concentrations of scattered forces forN
large-scale round-ups), 11am Lynch travelled to Davin's of Rathsallagh,
near Cashel, (our Brigade Headquarters) and complained with what seemed
to me to be a good deal of pent-up feeling and politely-suppressed
indignation that the South Irish Horse (a British Cavalry- Unit stationed
at Cahir Military Barracks) was continually raiding southwards into his
Brigade area. He informed me in measured terms that it was my bounden
duty as the O/C. of the area in which Cahir was situated, to put an
instant stop to these irksome, disconcerting raids - by sealing them off
from the South.
I told him that these same S.I.H. had been doing the same thing
north, east and west into our territories from 1918 until a few months
previously when they gave up coming our way because they had got nothing
but headaches from us (?). "They must be finding it less uncongenial
to raid Cork 2", I badgered in the good-humoured banter we all
inflicted on one another in those days, especially if there was even a
alight danger of a debate degenerating into argument.
But Lynch was deadly serious. Liam was ever a man in a hurry to
get something done.
I had cane to know many, if not most, of his idiosyncrasies.
2.
When he visited Dublin, on the run, from 1919 Liam always had his
private hide-out at our Brigade' s Dublin Headquarters in Delaney's
of 71 Heytesbury Street. Whenever 11am fell ill or was worn out and
needed an undisturbed rest, he retired to Delaney's.
This happened twice I think, during the Tan war and once during the
Only a few of
his own men knew where to find him. George Power, his Vice Commander,
Tadg Byrne and 11am Deasy visited him there. So did the Chief of
Staff, Richard Mulcahy, meet him there during the Truce. It was
inevitable that I too, should meet him there. I got to know how
seriously Liam viewed everything. I felt that he ignored if not
deliberately suppressed, as a waste of tine and energy, his own sense
of humour. Yet he must have developed a good sense of humour. No
man could possibly have lived and worked so long and so much with so
many of the Cork boys without being smitten by a reasonable dose of
the contagion.
Seán Moylan, who succeeded him as O/C. Cork 2, could and did
enjoy a joke at the beginning or middle as well as at the end of a
serious "scrap" or talk, and he could properly appreciate its value
and timing. Moylan was leader of a very active Column. He knew
that humour and panic (of any sort) are mutually allergic.
But if Ham had a sense of humour he certainly had no time for
it when he was in a hurry to accomplish an objective. He was "Liam
in a hurry" now.
So, soberly, I pointed out that if we attempted to deal with the
problem the way he had suggested, we would have to keep a very large
well-armed force permanently isolated in the narrow Aherlow Glen,
hemmedin between big British forces situated in Kilworth Camp and
Mallow in the south and Cahir and Clonmel in the north and, at the
same time, hedged in by the Galtee and Knockmealdown Mountains on the
Truce period.
3.
west and east. I laid emphasis on the fact that neither our Brigade
nor any other Brigade on its own had the equipment necessary or the
numbers to spare, and that our Brigade had neither the inclination nor
any intention to attempt such a suicidal commitment. The Glen of
Aherlow was constantly being fine-combed by combined forces from Cork,
Waterford and Tipperary Counties. Seán Hogan's Column, for example,
pot out on one occasion during one of these enormous concentrations
only by a miracle of coolness. Lacey's column captured D.I. Potter
in the process of fighting its way out on another occasion.
Liam recognised the difficulties. I think he sensed the latent
hint that this particular cap fitted more than one heads Nevertheless,
it did not absolve me in his eyes. "You will have to do something
about it", he insisted.
Knowing Liam's penchant (probably G.H.Q. engendered) for paper
organisation and knowing how wasteful of critical tine it could be with
so many unforeseeable factors involved, I made the obvious suggestion
that the only possible way to deal with the situation was to combine at
once sufficient forces on lines parallel to the British.
Liam murmured it would be necessary to get permission from G.H.Q.
before making even a tentative change in Army formation. I had
suggested a try-out combination on a voluntary basis among a number of
local Brigades. We could begin with an association of the three Cork
Brigades, East Limerick Brigade and the d and 3rd Tipperary Brigades.
These six Brigades were all of a timbre. They were contiguous. The
slight psychological differences among us were complementary rather
than divergent. There would be a mixture of different kinds of good
milk, but there would be no addition of water in the mixture. They
would make an almost Irresistible force. They were all of good will,
4.
keen; they all had all the practical experience necessary for larger
combinations. They could be augmented as necessity or opportunity
arose.
As the piece-de-resistance for Man, I harped on the Immediate
necessity of liquidating (though that word was not much used among us
then) Cahir Military Barracks. As an initial test, it had much to
recommend it. If successful, even if the success were only relative,
we should than have concrete demonstrable proof of the value and
necessity of combining Brigades for super-brigade actions. The
necessity of combining Brigades should have been self-evident even to
our G.H.Q. hidden (and rightly so) in the fortresses of their Dublin
dug-outs. Their only vision was the reflection of the City activities.
It was only after de Valera's return from the U.S.A. that the attack on
theCustom House
was mooted. They could not focus large-scale operations.
Though at that time I felt confident that G.H.Q. would have been
delighted to see such a spirit of initiative among us, I was too anxious
about the time element not to press its claim.
I gathered from monosyllabic hints from 11am that (1) he would prefer
to start with all Munster and (2) that he had no intention (thought) of
initiating anything without prior permission from G.H.Q. I remember
thinking at the time that Ham's attitude resembled, somewhat a D.D.
refusing to write a thesis unless and until he had first got his Bishop's
imprimatur. In fairness to Liam it must be added that that attitude
seemed to please G.H.Q.!
Liam made no sustained argument. He was, as ever, in a hurry for
a decision that he could accept at its face value without question or
conscience searching. To Ham, unless a decision were legitimate, it
could not be moral. On the other hand, it was my conviction that, during
revolutionary periods, it' a thing be morally right in itself and at the
5
same time be urgent and necessary, it would be legitimatized
subsequently - for what pure legalities are worth in a revolution
with the enemy taking full advantage of our slow moving)f hobble-
skirted Army formation and regulations! Here were we lying in wait
for permission to surprise the enemy with a new tactic while he was
all ready and afoot to attack us It would have taken a truce of
three months' duration to enable us to organise all Munster into a
unified fighting force by any other means than by concrete example.
Example would bring in every unit automatically and instantly.
I think Liam imagined I was inviting him to put the telescope to
a blind eye - which he had not got. At best he must have suspected
that I was handing him the wrong end of a telescope to look through
Liam must have got the low-down on me from G.H.Q.1
It was well known to me and to other Brigade Officers that G.H.Q.
was Sanctum Sanctorum to Man, that the Chief of Staff was its High
Priest, and that Liam and all Cork were as the children of light to
G.H.Q. And rightly so. As a County, no place was doing as much;
as a man, no one had done more than Liam lynch to break the British
connection. This is not an "admission" on my part. "Admission"
savours of reluctance to say a thing: I have no reluctance whatever
to declaring, no apology to offer for saying as I now repeat, that
Ham Lynch and all Rebel Cork were dutstanding and were deservedly
courted by G.H.Q.
To get back to 11am. He was quietly fidgeting with obvious
impatience at what must have seemed to him my "dialectics", and, in his
usual quiet, strictly polite manner, his intriguing slight impediment
of speech a little accentuated, he put his proposition direct,
unequivocally and with finality: "Will I call a meeting of Munster
Brigade Officers, get their views and send a report to G.H.Q.?"
6.
The question was knits either Liam's doctrinaire - legitimate scheme
or none.
What else could I do but take his hand, shake it warmly and say:
"I'm behind you, Liam."
This conversation took place in an open field, Liam's two companions
(who they were I do not remember) keeping a sharp unbroken look-out.
All three moved off at once. I returned to Rathsallagh dug-out.
Liam Lynch lost no time in calling the meetings It was held in
Glanworth, Co. Cork. Most of theMunster
BrigadesEast (Ph)
of the Shannon were
represented. I received the great honour and courtesy of being moved to
the Chair. Con Moloney was requested to act as Secretary for the purpose
of drawing up the report. There was complete unanimity. The report
was duly forwarded to G.H.Q. G.H.Q. subsequently (and without any
acknowledgement reaching me as Chairman) informed us through E. O'Malley
(who had not been at the meeting) that Munster was to be divided into
four separate divisions. The Rebel aid the Premier Counties were
isolated anew and more effectively. Cahir was never seriously attacked.
On paper, the country as a whole was partitioned into sixteen divisions.
Was it method in their madness or was it madness in their method that
killed a scheme that would have borne quick fruit?
Perhaps G.H.Q. were aware of the beginnings of peace negotiations
about that time, and perhaps the Chief of Staff wanted to be able to say
(as he said later), with some semblance of conviction, that "The I.R.A.
could not attack a reasonably sized Police Barracks". (Dáil reports,
December, 1921).
LOCH LEIN,
Eglantine Park,
Douglas Road,
Cork.
5th March, 1953,
Mr. Seamus Robinson,18, Highfield Road,RathgarDublin,
Dear Seamus,
Thank you very much for sending me a copy of the very interesting
notes which you have written as a basis for a statement. I hope you will
continue to expand them and eventually make a book of them,
What you have written on Liam Lynch does convey a pretty accurate
impression of his character, although I think you have perhape over
emphasised the idea of Liam in a hurry, and of his sense of discipline, which
I think was the only reason why he was always anxious, not so much not to do
anything without G.H.Q. sanction, as to carry G.H.Q. with him in any
developments which he felt we were capable of undertaking.
In regard to the proposals for the formation of the divisions Tit would
be interesting if you can show why your original idea was not adopted at
the Glanworth Conference. I am including in the book on 11am, the
recommendations made at the Glanworth Conference, as recorded by Con Moloney,
and they do not include any suggestion for the formation of division
organisation, although undoubtedly the ideas for co-operation between the
Brigades which we put forward at Glanworth were the germ of the divisional
idea.
Another point I think you might check is on what you say of his visits
to Dublin. What you have written would give the impression that he
frequently went to Dublin and always to Delaneys at 71 Heytesbury St.
2.
Neither would be accurate. Apart from the two months which he spent
in Dublin in January and February 1920 all his subsequent visits were
never of more than two days duration each, and the number of these visits
in to the Truce was three. In justice to Liam I think you might
distinguish between the pre-Truce and the post-Truce visits.
I am afraid I could not agree that the basis on which you put the
formation of the divisions includes all the relevant factors. In what I
have written on the formation of the First Southern I have depended
largely on two documents; the recommendations which the Glanworth
Conference made to G.H.Q. and the G.H.Q. Memorandumon the formation of
divisions which I have. I must say that reading them for the first tint
30 years afterwards they did not conflict with any recollection I had of
the views which we held at the time.
I hope you will not take it amiss that I should make these
observations because I do so solely in the interests of historical
accuracy. I think the general impression you give of Liam makes it far
easier for the uniniated to visualise the man than any-thing I have been
able to put together in an effort to convey some idea of his character.
I hope you will continue to work along the same lines.
With kind regards and best wishes.
Yours sincerely,
(Sdg.) Florrie O'Donoghue.
18, Highfield Road,Rathgar,
Dublin.
16th March, 1953.
My dear Florrie,
Many, many thanks for your generous comments and your most helpful
advice.
My short reply to most of the points you made is: "I'm not a
historian; I have neither the time nor the patience nor the ability
to be one"! In my introduction, which I had already sketched out
before I started my statement, I point out" ...... you may can it
(the statement) 'his story' but please, not 'history'. History is
for historians to write'. That means you, Florrie.
Historians have to take all our statements and relative documents
and weigh the evidence before collating it. Little bits of
verisimilitude will lend weight to the evidence; and that's why I wenta
into some little personal details on what, to me, was an historic
meeting between flam Lynch and me. The Glanworth Conference, was more
in the nature of a formality, and I, not being "the makin's" of a
historian, nor "a chiel amang ye takin' notes", details have become
forgotten or obscured. But the personal meeting is still vividly clear.
I had better make some attempts to deal with the points you raise,
seriatim.
Yours: P. I. par. 5. It is obvious (though, as you point out,
not in the "extract") that other factors had a bearing on the formation
of the Divisions. Those other factors are in your bailiwick as a
historian, All I meant to convey to you was that the Lynch-Robinson
meeting was one important (paramount?) initiating factor. I sent you
a copy of the "extract" in case you were seeking the originating motive
behind the idea of unification of effort in the Army - as distinct from
2.
divisions in the Army. My penultimate paragraph will give some idea
of the reaction G.H.Q.'s final decision had on my mind at the time - a
decision that divided Munster among four Divisions; the practical
result of which was a minus quantity - unless my last paragraph is an
approximation of G.H.Q's intent.
Yours. par. 3.
(a) You will remember I was given the courtesy of being moved to
the chair.
(b) The Cork officers had drawn up an agenda.
As chairman it was my duty to carry out the agenda with all soldierly
brevity. My recollection of that agenda is that it left organisation
in the air or to G.H.Q., and, therefore, my personal wishes were not
excluded. I accepted the agenda and the decisions knowing that Liam
had already known my views. In any case I had agreed to get behind
Liam as the only practicable policy.
I think it is the heading under which the "extract" appears
that justifies your remarks. There is no such heading in my original
script notes. I was puzzled trying to find a heading for the "extract".
All I have a right to say in this connection (or under any heading) is
that the meeting between Liam and me set the ball rolling towards greater
unity rather than divisions. But, Divisions technically mean greater
unity, and so "formation of Divisions", "unity of action"oncognate ideas.
Perhaps it would clarify things if I changed my first paragraph to
read: "I postulate that the germ of the idea of forming the Army into
large Divisions chrvsalised Incidentally during ..... etc."
Yours. par. 2. I thoroughly agree. Mine, par. 4: "Liam was
ever a man in a hurry" is gratuitous. After all, I wasn't for ever
with Liam! It was a hurriedly recalled general impression I had of
Liam that I had in mind. I should have qualified the statement.
3.
I think it should be changed to read: "It was never my fortune to
meet Liam Lynch but it seemed to me he was in a hurry to get somewhere
definite with something concrete".
Yours. par. 4 Your comment is fair, Still, I think the context
would go to show I was concerned with the fact that Delaney's was Liam's
Drivate hide-out when ill. Geo. Power would probably be able to
disentangle the pre and post Truce visits. I met Liam 2 or 3 times
there - and only there - though I was not like Dan Breen and 5en Treacy
very often in Dublin during the Tan war: I was kept too busy in
Tipperary.
Liam's brother, the Christian Brother, his brother Torn and an uncle
and Liam's mother visited Delaney's at one time or another. There was
one fairly lengthy stay by Liam in Heytesbury St. I remember he slept
in Lawlor's, about four doors away, and worked in Delaney's during the
day owing to Delaney's being overcrowded. Fintan or Dermott Lawlor
works with "Tod" Andrews in Bórd na Móna, Being young he would surely
recall Liam's visits.
Yours faithfully,
(Sired) Seumas Robinson.
Ma1or Florence O'Donoghue,'Loch Léin',Eglantine Park,Douglas Road,CORK.
LOCH LÉIN,
Eglantine Park,
Douglas Road,
Cork.
17th April, 1953.
"tr. Seamus Robinson,Bureau of Military History,26, Westland Row,Dublin.
Dear Seamus,
May I trouble you to look at the enclosed letter, although
I sin afraid you will find it very difficult to read.
I would be glad to know if this story of a British Intelligence
Officer is well founded. What became of him and the date on which
the thing occurred if it is true.
I would be grateful also for your opinion confidentially as to
whether the writer is a reliable person. Please return the letter to
me.
With kind regards and best wishes.
Yours sincerely,
(Sdg.) Florrie O'Donoghue.
18, Highfield Road,Rathgar,
DUBLIN.
21st April, 1953.
Dear Florrie,
In case you should be in a hurry to get an answer to yours of
17th instant, herewith this note.
Seamus Babington was, as he says, our Brigade Engineer. He had
a genius for invention and whether or not this genius penetrates into
his story-telling I don't know. In case I should be misunderstood, I
hasten to declare that Seamus Babington is always subjectively truthful.
However, like all fundamentally truthful people he is relatively easily
gullible to exaggerated details. If his lilies are painted it was not
he who "donnit" but cute "re-talers" of the latest news.
My present conclusion and recollection is that he is referring to the
spy O'Neill case. "O'Neill" was the name the spy gave us and I have a
'hunch" it was his correct name. Physiologically he was clearly an Irish
type. He had an ordinary English accent (admitted he was ex Br. A1nw)
but he had control over his hs. His accent was cultivated not cultured.
He said he lived in Waterford with relatives. Would give no address but
addressed his last letter to a girl in Waterford. I sensed at the time
that he had got himself into some trouble and needed money to get out of
it.
He had nothing on him that would indicate either rank or position -
a circumstance that had its own value as evidence.. The only thing found
on him was an ornamental clip of .303 ammunition. This "innocent" clip
was his final undoing. He had persistently denied spying (naturallyl) ;
he was "looking for work". We traced no application for work. Then
Jerome Davin, O/C. Bn. 1, shot a bow at a venture: "This ornamental clip
gives you away completely". "That's only a souvenir".
2.
"Test Well the last spy we shot told us before he died that
it was a secret identification among Intelligence Agents". "Oh!
The dirty, mean, dastardly, cowardly bastard". I don't guarantee
the order of the adjectives he used but he used them all. and more;
but he did not use in presence any of the usual filthy British
Army lingo.
He was a Catholic and Fr. Kingston of Rockwell College
attended him the night he was executed. Just as he was about
to be shot he made one last dramatic outburst of denial that he
was a spy. I went over to him and said quietly: "Young man, you
are about to die. Don't say anything that may sully your
conscience at this awful moment". Instantly he had himself under
control. "I'm not afraid to die" was all he answered.
Seamus Babington's letter returned herewith.
Best regards.
Yours sincerely,
(Sdg.) Seumas Robinson.
Major Florence O'Donoghue,"Loch Léin",Eglantine Park,Douglas Road,CORK.
LOCH LÉIN,
Eglantine Park,
Douglas Road,
Cork.
27th April, 1953.
Mr. Seamus Robinson,18, Highfield Rd.,Rathgar,Dublin.
Dear Seamus,
Thank you very much for your letter of the 21st. and for the
return of Seamus Babington's letter to me, I am very grateful for
the trouble you have taken in giving me the facts of this O'Neill
case. It looks as if he may have been on the same mission as was
Lieut. Vincent in Cork 2. Brigade area. For the reason that I thought
this may be possible, arid that there is useful evidence of similar
activities in other Brigades, I was interested to get the facts of
this case.
With kind regards and best wishes.
Yours sincerely,
(Signed) Florrie O'Donoghue.
Sincere sympathy on yourbereavement.
(Signed) Florrie.
18 Highfield Road,Rathgar,
Dublin.
'Phone 92094 (Dub).
My dear Lord Abbot,
If it pleases you would you kindly pass the enclosed copies of
two letters - (1) addres5ed to "Scan Fitzpatrick' my one-time adjutant,
and (2) letter addressed to "Sec. Soloheadbeg Memorial Committee"to
Father Colmcille.
The context of (1) above shows, sufficiently clearly, I think, the
reason why I do not desire to write to Father Colmcille directly. The
other letter shows that the plot to ignore me (and worse) is longstanding
and widespread.
I would like both Father Colmcille and you to consider the "attacks"
contained in (1) enclosed as rebuttals to statements intended for
publication by Father Colmcille, the Tipperaryman-Historian - not the
priest, God bless him.
Truth and "Justice thoush the heavens fall' is my reason and excuse
for writing you.
Subjective truth is all right with the Almighty, but only if a
serious effort has been made to find out if it is in consonance with the
objective truth.
Will you both please excuse r and pray for me?
I am, my Lord Abbot,with great respect and reverence,
Yours faithfully,
Seumas Robinson.
Rt. Rev. Dom Benignus Hickey,Abbot, Mellifont,Collon,Co. Louth.
Appendix No.
18, Highfield Road,Rathgar,
DUBLIN.
21st April, 1952.
Dear Seán,
Thanks indeed for the opnortunity to peruse the typescript of
Fr. C's. "History".
I could begin my comments in a dozen different ways, each one more
sarcastic than its predecessor, but, in charity, I'll begin in the
mildest manner I can command.
I cannot make up my mind whether Fr. C. is simple (the virtue);
or is a simpleton (within strict limits) or is suffering (enjoying?) a
certain complex monomania - 'Danbreenofile' with its usual concomitant
counterbalance :- S.R.ophobia.
Do you know, Seán, I'm beginning to suspect there is something
"great" somewhere in my make-up; I'm finding out, that, like most great
men in history, thereat de Valera and myself (God and de Valera forgive
me this coupling have many people who hate us; hate us for different
reasons, of course, and, or, enera1ly for no reason at all. Why are
we hated so much (and strangest thing about it is that it is often our
should-be friends who voice that hatred most) seeing that neither of us
has consciously done or said (up to this at least) anything to justify
it.
A little more expression or display of this hatred or dislike, or
expressed or implied contempt, and I'll begin tofeel "great".
So many lies (I know that is not a nice word; but there's no use4f
denying there is such a thing as lies: "All men are liars") have been
told and reiterated against me and about South Tipperary Brigade, that
it. behaves me to get on quickly- with my "The Great 'Oaks' of South
Tipperary."
2.
As you know, I've said elsewhere that I've waited 30 years
for some generous-minded Tipperary man to undo some at least of the
ungenerous treatment I have received at the hands of so many 4th
Battalion Tipperary men, miring the two wars who would have thought
that when they were finished I would be damned by slight praise and
worse for the 30 years that followed
If Fr, C's. superiors permit him to publish his "History" as it
stands, the glaring fact that he never met, saw, knew or consulted me
(the one and only officer who held Brigade rank from the moment the
l3rirade was formed until the start of the Civil War - when I was
promoted - and not only Brigade rank but the one and only officer
ever in commandof the Brigade during the whole of the Tan War) will
be the first deadly shot, out of a locker-full of deadly shots that
I will discharge at his book,
In this respect Fr. C. reminds me of the Yankee lady who, fairly
recently, declared that she had examined every religion in the world,
looking for an intellectually satisfying religious philosophy -
I'"every religion in the world, except the Catholic, of course. As
writers would ar the italics are mine, the brilliance, hers,
Fr. C. is more astute. By gathering his jig-saw pieces, and,
by judicious selection, manipulation and juxtapositioning, and with
sufficient suppressio yen he has produced his own (?) pet solution -
or is it his own pet's solution'
If the latter, and he is honest with himself, he will know that
the origins, claim doesn't tally with Fr, C's. own C'?) present, but
even more illogical version of Dan Breen being Brigadier. It is
simple historic fact that Pan Breen was never O/C. of the Brigade.
He was never even i/c of an organised fight in Tipperary,
3.
Breen's original claim to be Brigade O/C (vide "My fight etc")
was the pretence that he had been elected Brigadier: "... and
later when I became Brigadier .."; then the book goes on to
describe "the democratic method" of electing Brigade and other officers,
adumbrating, in retrospect, his own election as Brigade O/C -
carefully calculated deception! Fr. C. isn't standing over that
directly: his new stand (you and I know it, too must come from
Breen) is not upright; and the only thing "cute" about it is its
acute angle to the perpendicular.
It is neither intelligent nor honest to try to bolster-up
falsehood y arguments still further out of plumb; it is neither
intelligent nor honest to speak of a man being Brigadier or a Battalion
O/C before either of the units concerned had been formed. Before the
Brigade was formed the only unit recognised was the Company. In any
case isn't all this miserable pettifogging business a piece of
blatant sophistry, unbecoming a serious and sincere student? Surely
Fr. C. knows how to weigh evidence. He knows where to look for it.
He knows how to collate it. He knows, he must know, that the truth
doesn't lie in the tissue of "My Fight etc". He is too astute to
fail to detect the many direct and indirect falsifications and mean
innuendos of the authoress and the reputed "author" of "it' Fight etc." -
unless his "Doherty was Doherty!"'
Mr Seumas O'Doherty wrote the book for him.
Why does Fr. C. consult Dan Breen so much? Dan Breen knows
nothing, or very little, except on hearsay, of what went on in
Tipperary during the greater part of the Tan War. From July 1919
to July 1920 he was in Dublin. Yet Breen claims we were with him
at Holly-ford (May) and Drangan (July). Fr. C. must know Breen was
in Dublin then, and was at neither of these affairs. In July 1920,
after Drangan, Breen came down to Tipperary for about two weeks, then
back to Dublin until about December 1920 when he was going round
4.
Tipperary, (Dublin had become too hot for him after Fernside)
with George Plunkett - mostly "parading for review". Offhand,
I'd say that flan Preen didn't spend a total of three weeks in the
Brigade area during the Tan War from July 1919 until O'Malley
relieved me or him early in 1921. O'Malley thought he had a
"catch". He had to dump that catch rather quickly - (let him ask
O'Ma1ley!.
Surely Fr. C. should be able to realise the colossal
impertinence and impudence of "My fight etc". Preen had no
responsibility either for policy or action. I never even consulted
Preen on anything except his Q.M. Dept. and his numerous
"assistants". I've never known Preen to make an original
constructive suggestion. He merely listened in ("takin notes") like
an uneducated Boswell. But Boswell didn't pretend he was Dr.Johnson!
Did you, Seán, ever hear of an original Breen suggestian
yourself, or come across anything constructive (except in "My Fight
etc.") that could have emanated from Dan Preen? It wasn't very
original to keep in his possession routine and special field
despatches, dead against orders (vide Fr. C.) nor was it very original
to "take the first train home" at Kilcash and leave the rere of Lacey
exposed to the Staters in 1922; nor was it very original to let his
Darty down (Jinks had forestalled him in originality here) and enter
the Dáil on his own and take the oath of Allegiance without any public
or private reservation. Preen had already broken the Pact Election
at the behest of Staters - that wasn't very original either. Did
Fr. C. ask himself why Preen did all above things?
Has he even noted them?
Has he noted that the Staters gave Dan Preen a house and farm, gave
him 200t disability pension (he had only two bullet wounds in the
whole of his I.R.A.career in Ireland - wounds that healed up immediate)y
5.
and, why did these same Staten, when they got back to power as
a Coalition, in the first 24 hours, almost, of their existence
rush a bill through the Dáil granting him (not byname!) £3,000 for
Doctors' bills "contracted in the U.S.A.". This was done without
enquiry into the bona tides of those bills
Does Fr. C. see the different significance in the historic facts (1)
that when the Truce came the Brigade officers came in a deatation to
me asking me to stand for the 2nd Dáil and the 3rd Dáil - for the
Pact, not against it like Dan Breen. (2). The Government selected me for
membership of the M.S.P. Board and the Bureau of Military History't1
That I had won my spurs in 1916 being promoted twice
on the field - long before I went to Tipperary.
I couldn't stomach reading past page 14. Brighid read the
remainder - I couldn't.
Another bit of 'rank' nonsense! "Comdt. Gen, Dan Breen"
"Comdt. S. Fitzpatrick!"
If Fr. C. could manage to ask Bill Quirke's opinion, say,
when Quirke had been to Confession and before Communion, then Bill's
lanuage would probably be printable.
It might be no harm to ask Fr. C. to get Nick Davern to write his
opinion of Dan Breen - not to state it in sound-words, either before,
during or after Confession.
No time or inclination to write more of this.
Best regards.
SEUMASROBINSON.
6.
A hurried P.S.
I showed the above to Brighid. She was furious because I left
out some dozens of broadsides. I asked did she want me to write a whole
book, or to write without ceasing - a babbling brook. She insisted that
at least (this "at least" business is becoming a habit with me). I must
remark on "the very important work in connection with discussions at
on the formation of Columns and other important matters which
kept Breen and Seán Treaty in Dublin" or words to that effect: I didn't
read them myself.
Seán Treaty was in Dublin to see May Quigley off to a new position
in Clan, where he could have seen her as easily as in Dublin; but he was
also in Dublin for the fixing up of the legal side of his patrimony. These
are the only cold and hot facts about that - the suggested impertinent
back-stair hugger-mugger with G.H.Q. to the contrary notwithstanding.
Dan Breen at that time was busy going round with Jimmy Walsh of the
bleeding statues fame. He actually brought the already notorious Walsh to
71 Heytesbury St., our Dublin H.Q.! He brought Walsh to "71" the day
Mick Lambe of Cloomel was brought and dumped then, badly wounded, semiconscious,
semiconscious,raving and still bleeding profusely. Bill Myles, Frank Drohan,
O'Keeffe and O'Gormanof Clonmel left Lambe in sole charge of Bridgie who
was the only one at home that day. Before Dick McKee and Paddy Daly
arrived to take Lambe to the Mater Hospital, Dan Breen arrived with
Jimmy Walsh hoping to get Walsh to invert his "bleeding" miracles.
No wonder Fernside followed soon after.
No wonder "71" was raided for the first and second times immediately
after.
Brighid reminded me also (though I hadn't forgotten) that at this
time my third urgent letter arrived, this tine demanding the return of a
big number of' South Tipperary Officers who had been enjoying themselves
7.
and "Willie Reilly and his Colleen Bawn" at a Ranelagh picture
house (I think it was ) long enough.
Denis Lacey, J.J. Hogan and Seán O'Mara returned at once.
No wonder I trusted them enough to put them In important positions.
(Intid.) S.R.
22.3.'52.
18, Highfield Road,Rathgar,
Dublin.
25.4.'52.
Dear Seán
In re mine of 22nd and 23rd instant:-
P.P.S.
This post-post-script is like what the children call "a folly-up"
in an Alice in Wonderland film:
Curiouser and curiouser = two photostat communications purportingto
to come from Maurice Crowe as "Me. Adj". to "Dan Breen Commandant South
Tipp. Bde." dated April 1918.
The "Hue and Cry" must have been presented with one of these jokes
or hoaxes found lying (?) around somewhere:- "Daniel Breen. Calls
himself Commandant South Tipperary Bde."
No doubt Dan preens himself, but why did Maurice crow?
Did (or will) Fr. C. enquire into the bona-fides of the circumstances
(if any) of time and place of, or into any reason (rational or otherwise)
advanced for the appointment, or selection, or election, or nomination to
(even by default) or assumption of Brigade ranks at a time, and in
circumstances under which G.H.Q. itself had no power to recognise a Brigade
much less a Bri2ade staff; and yet not only before the Brigade was formed
but. before there ms even a properly created Bn., these photostat copies
purport to be communications between two Brigade staff officers!
I've already hinted at "The Great 'Oaks' of South Tipperary"; these
two photostatic copies must be a pair of littles hoaxes. Maurice and
Dan must have been playing at being "officers and gentlemen" before the
curtain was raised on the first performance - before even the preview.
The production of the two photostats at this time of day brings to
my mind the old adage about the three degrees of lies: "lies, damn lies
2.
and statistics". They also auto-suggest (they do suggest) a
parallel: A Jesuit once said that a little bit of
verisimiltude, especially if it is in the concrete, can turn an
ordinary lie into a calumny".
The object in producing (whatever about the reproduction)
of the two communications goes much further: they are meant to
turn what was obviously at the time a harmless joke into serious
statics (ref. the above superlative).
The discovery- of two perfect wax replicas of the swallow
wouldn't be proof that it was double-summertime.
Yours sincerely,
(Sdg.) Seumas Robinson.
Appendix No.
18 Highfield Road,Rathgar,
Dublin.
16th January 1950.
W.F. O'Connell Esq.,Hon. Sec. Soloheadbeg Memorial,St. Michael's St.,Tipperary.
A Chara,
Your formal invitation to attend the unveiling of the Memorial
to Soloheadbeg Ambush has been received.
For reasons that seem good to me I must decline the invitation.
As a member of the "Bureau of Military History 1913-1921" I have
to be careful that my presence and silence at a function such as the
unveiling of the Memorial at Soloheadbeg Cross (where I was the Officer
in command) and where speeches and addresses will be made and delivered,
will not be interpreted as lending even the appearance of any shade of
official authority by me, either personally as the Brigade OfficerS
Commanding at the tine, or as a member of the Bureau of Military History,
to statements that may be made in connection with the function.
Judging by what happered in connection with the presentation made
to the survivors of the Knocklong rescue, in May last, I must be doubly
on guard. Extracts from a book had been printed in the "Irish Press"
dealing with some incidents in the history of South Tipperary Brigade
as part of the boosting of the then coming celebrations. The original
book from which the above mentioned extracts were taken was written by
one who had no first-hand knowledge of the events, and, judging by some
of the contents, the author seems to have based his incidents and
conclusions on a previously published book; and this latter book had
no authority from the G.H.Q. of the Republican Army at the tine or of
the officer commanding the Brigade or Division. I read those extracts.
On the whole I prefer Thick Rodgers.
2.
The Knocklong Rescue Committee had not the courtesy (not to say
the good sense) to ask my opinion on what should go into print as
historic fact. The Chairman (half a Tipperary man) of that Committee
gave me his word that I would see the drafts of the brochure before
final printing. His word was not kept. The fact, also, that I was
presented with an address at the reception (the address, by the way,
does admit I was something more than a mere "also ran", but which was
not published in the daily press or in the brochure - nor did I
receive a copy of the address until Christmas Eve 1914!) may be
intercepted by some as giving my imprimatur to the whole proceedings.
At least my silence at the reception (I had been requested to say
little more than "thanks" and I had been unable to read the brochure
until some days later) may well lead some people to think I have agreed
with everything then printed or stated. I wrote the "Irish Press"
quite a mild letter, little more than pointing out that I was not taking
any responsibility for the truth or untruth of any statements made in
connection with the Knocklong rescue celebrations. My justification
being that the "Irish Press" had published my name quite a number of
times in this connection.
The "Irish Press" refused to publish my letter.
In the brochure already referred to, it can be seen that the
ranks held by the living officers concerned are not mentioned anywhere
in it, nor in the advertisements or reports of the proceeding; and
this was done deliberate)s so that it might not appear anywhere in the
brochure who was officially and in truth the Officer Commanding ....he not being a Tipperary man?
To that suppressio yen, and to lend verisimilitude to certain
false claims (that they are false is well known to every officer and
men of South Tipperary Brigade living and dead) that anyone, at any
time during the whole of the Tan war, but I, was ever in charge of
South Tipperary Brigade, those responsible for the production of the
3.
brochure made use of the "Hue & Cry" (the organ of our bitterest
enemies, the R.I.C.!) by reproducing two photographs of Dan Breen,
the Brigade Q.M. (not to flatter him certainly - they are almost
libellous) and under them was the legend: "calls himself Commandant
of the South Tipperary Brigade". Need I labour the underlying
motive?
Now to connect all this with your Committee's invitation.
A number of Tipperary Officers were associated actively with
the above-mentioned Knocklong Rescue Committee, and I believe some
at least of these are associated with your Committee. From what I
have gleaned (and may God and your Committee forgive me if I am
wrong) I sense that my presence at the coming ceremony will be used
further to bolster up the suppressio veri I have referred to.
I have never yet tried to sound my own horn, nor have I ever yet
attempted to wash dirty linen in public - I have never even complained
in public - because I had hoped (forlornly?) that some generous-minded
Tipperary man would some day try to redeem what other Tipperary men
have done (or left undone) to a stranger who went amongst them out of
love for Ireland to do a certain job for Ireland and Tipperary and who
did it.
Until that is done I will continue to feel that, had I served my-
country in any other part of Ireland as I have served her in South
Tipperary, I would not have been damned with slight praise and worse,
for the last thirty years.
I am sure that you will now appreciate properly why I cannot with
any semblance of self-respect, accept your Committee's Invitation - or
any other similar invitation from South Tipperary.
Mise, do chara,
(Sgd.) Seumas Robinson.
Mellifont Abbey,Collon,
Co. Louth.
22nd April, 1953.
Dear Mr. Robinson,
The Abbot passed me on your letter with enclosures and I am
replying immediately so as to make my position quite clear.
In the first place, I should wish to make clear that the notes sent
you by Seán Fitzpatrick represented a rough draft of the book and were
not, by any means, Intended for publication. I pointed out to Sean
Fitzpatrick that there was bound to be many errors and omissions in the
notes and asked him to read them over and bring to my notice anything
which he thought would need revision, correction, or emendation, etc, I
think it is a pity that when he sent you those notes he did not make that
clear.
I have no desire to set dawn anything but what is true. I know
there will be certain matters on which there is bound to be controversy.
where those matters are of no importance they can, of course, be omitted;
but where they are of importance it will be necessary to get all the
evidence on both sides and lay it before the reader. I have no brief
for any individual. I am not writing to bolster-up any case for or
against anyone. I welcome any corrections which may be made and any
omissions which may be thought desirable to rectify, and for that purpose
I am fully prepared to let you have the typescript and make any notes
you wish as to suggested changes, additions or omissions. I can assure
you that any such emendations will receive the fullest possible
consideration from me, and I am as anxious as you are that no statementa
should be set down which would In any way do an injustice to you or
anyone else.
2.
On my last visit to Seán Fitzpatrick, before leaving him, I
asked him for your address which he gave me. I had fully intended
then calling to see you, but a chance remark which he made decided me
to write instead. Rightly or wrongly I got the impression from
Seán Fitzpatrick that I night not be persona grata to you, due to the
fact that I had been in communication with Dan Breen. I intended
writing, however, and had drafted the heads of a letter with a number
of queries concerning Brigade natters and only waited a favourable
opportunity for writing. Your letter yesterday made it necessary
for me to write at once. I was out when it arrived and so did not get
it in time to answer by return post.
With regard to those notes, I think the matter to which you
mostly objected was something I had written regarding the October
election 1918 when you were elected Brigadier. I am only going by
memory because that particular sentence or statement was queried by
Seán Fitzpatrick when returning the notes to me. I wrote to Maurice
Crowe then arid he also said the statement was incorrect in more than
one particular. I thereupon omitted that particular statement.
With regard to the question of whether Dan Breen ever held the
rank of Brigade Commandant or was called such I had no source of
information but Maurice Crowe. Dan Breen himself never told me
anything on the matter, nor did I ever ask him. In fact, on only one
occasion did I receive any communication either orally or in writing
regarding the actual work on hand from D.B. and that was a statement
re the election of Brigadier in October, 1918; the statement, I think
a to which you took objection and concerning which I had received an
intimation from Maurice Crowe that it should be changed. My other
statement, that re the early stages of the Brigade organisation, was
3.
based on evidence supplied by Maurice Crowe - not by Dan Breen
with whom I never even discussed the matter - and the reason I
wrote to Maurice Crowe was that Sean Fitzpatrick in a letter to me
in December, 1950, had told me that for the early days of the
organisation in S.' Tip. the principal men were Seán Treacy,
Dan Preen, Maurice Crowe, Artie and Matt Barlow, Brian Shanahan and
others. M.C. sent me two dispatches (from which were made the
photostats you refer to) and gave me written arid signed statements
concerning the whole matter.
With regard to the Tan war, I have nowhere denied that you
were Brigadier during the whole period, not only of the war itself,
but from the time of your election in October 1918 down to March
or April 1922 when you were promoted to be O/C, 2nd Southern
Division. Nor have I received any information from Dan Preen on
the matter. I don't think I am exaggerating when I say that the
information given me by Dan Preen is practically nil. There was
a statement made by me, indeed, in the original notes which was
based on a statement in Desmond Ryan's book and which would seem
to imply that you were only the nominal head of the Brigade while
Seán Treacy was the real head. I was not the author of that
statement. On reading through my notes I came to the conclusion
that Desmond Ryan, writing Treacy's biography would naturally
enough try to magnify the hero of the book - though I don't think
Treacy needed to be magnified - and so I decided when re-writing
those notes to omit that sentence, which, in fact, I did. Then
there is the question as to why Preen and Treacy remained behind
in Dublin. I, following Desmond Ryan's account, said they were
interviewing G.H.Q. in connection with the Flying Columns.
In following Desmond Ryan's account I was under the impression
4.
that he knew what he was talking about as he gives you as one of
the sources from whom he received first hand information, Of
course, if you, as Brigadier, deny this, I shall give your denial full
orominence. Mention is wade of Hollyford and Drangan arid you point
out that ThanPreen was not present in either place. I quite agree.
I neither state nor even hint that he was present and I give you full
credit for your leadership in Hollyford, Drangan, and Rearcross.
Of course, I have no interest in anything except getting the
story of the right and getting as near to the truth as possible. I
do not want to indulge in personalities or to take part for or against
any individual or any group. I am trying to get at the truth - not
only the subjective, but also the objective truth.
With reference to "My Fight, etc." I have used it very little
and have only quoted it in a very few instances. For the account of
the Barrack Attacks my versions have been based mostly on the story
as told by Ernie O'Malley with additions as found in Desmond Ryan's
book, hut mostly on O'Malley's version.
Finally I would like to emphasise the fact that I have no
intention of either manipulating or selecting my material so as to
give a one-sided account, still less that I am actuated (as you would
seem to believe) by any ill-will or even hatred of you. I have no
"phobia" in this matter. I cannot help thinking that it is a pity
that Sean Fitzpatrick when sending you the notes referred to did not
explain that they were intended by me not as a final but rather as a
draft-version and that I not only had no objection to but actually
welcomed their correction. I think that if you agree to my
suggestion that I send von the text as it now stands with the very
considerable additions, omissions, emendations and corrections which
5.
have been made since you saw what were the draft notes, more or
les, on which the final version was to be based, you will come
to the conclusion that you have (unwittingly) done me an injustice
in imputing to me motives which do not exist.
I think I have explained my position sufficiently clearly
and await your reply with interest in the hope that you will see
your way to agree to my proposal to forward you the typescript to
comment on as you wish and to note down any corrections, additions,
omissions or emendations which you may deem desirable in the
Interests o" historical accuracy. In that case, of course, I would,
when I have received back the script with your notes, revise and
correct where necessary and let you have a copy of the revised
version when completed before taking any further steps in the matter.
Assuring you of my best wishes and a remembrance in my prayers,
I am,
Yours sincerely,
(Signed) B. COLMCILLE.
(Br. Colmcille).
"Irish Times" 6/2/50.
Sir, - Surely, the "letters to the editor" column of a newspaper is
not an appropriate place to initiate a debate, with each correspondent
f]yin off at his own pet tangents, on the ethics of Soloheadbeg ambush,
or, say, on the morality of French partisans shooting din German
soldiers "going about their peaceful duties" after the official surrender
of France; or, again, on the morality or immorality, in the light of
international decency, not to say Christian theology, of Irishmen
joining the British Army and killing people who were fighting for their
owncountries?
What do some of your correspondents hope to achieve? Do they
want to show (with secret delight') that the British Empire - excuse me -
that this wee mutilated State of ours was conceived and brought forth
in iniquity, and must come to a bad end (their "bad end" justifying
their means?). However, at least one of' your correspondent, a lady,
seems to be genuinely worried; perhaps the following relevant points
t may help:
(1) The existence of the First Dáil had not yet been promulgated
throughout the country when the ambush took place.
(2) The men at Soloheadbeg ambush acted under standing directions
of the Army to obtain arms and munitions when and where they could be
got. Virtually tons of explosives had been captured in Scotland by
the Fianna and I.R.B. and sent to Dublin for the 1916 Rising, and at
least one big raid was carried out in Dublin before Easter Week.
These raids for munitions were a well-established routine.
(3) That. the two unfortunate and brave R.I.C. men refused to
a surrender is abundantly clear to anyone who read the evidence of the
Inquest, and remembers it. What is not so clear is that the
nolicemen tried to shoot after they were called on two or three times
to surrender.
(4) - Oh What's the use! The more light you show to a bigot,
the more he shuts it out, like the pupil of a cat's eye. -
Yours, etc.,"DALARIADA".
Dublin, February 6th, 1950.
Appendix No.
Seanad Eireann,Tigh Laighean,
Baile Atha Clsather.
Sept 1935.
Secretary,M/S. Pensions Board.
A Chars,
With regard to Sean Hogan's application for a M/S Certificate,
I wish to draw the attention of the Board to the fact that Sean Hogan
deserve! special consideration.
Hogan's service previous to 1917 can be vouched for by Mr. Dan Breen,
T.D., and others. 1-Tissubsequent service is known to me - and to everyone
in Tipperary.
Hogan took part (while still in his "teens") in as many military
engagements as anyone in Ireland. He was at the ambush of Soloheadbeg in
January 1919 and was on the run for his life from that time until the
Truce. He took part in ma6 if not most, of the bigger activities of the
Dublin A.S.U. He was present at the formation of that unit and was an
honorary member of it.
Hogan had charge of a large Column during the "Tan" war, and he
handled it excellently. He was an officer who could be entrusted with
any special service or commission.
It might be as well to point out that Hogan received no pay; and
if men who had not as good a record as he, and who had been in the receipt
of pay, have got special recognition under the 192I Act (some being given
the highest rank then I beg to submit that Sean Hogan should receive
similar treatment.
Miss
(Signed) Seumas Robinson.O/C. 2nd. Southern Div.
THEASHTOWN
AMBUSH
PREVIOUS PLANSTO
KIDNAP LORDFRENCH
AN ADVENTOROUS CYCLE RIDEASHTOWN.Some time before theAshtown
(By Senator Seamus Robinson. ambushI was presentat a meeting
O/C. South Tipperary Brigade, of the Active ServiceUnits, drawn
I.R.A., 1918-22, and then O/C. from the variousbattalionsand presided2nd Southern Division). over by Dick Mulcahy. He
SHORTLYafter the Soloheadbeg explainedto usthat we wouldhaveto
ambush of January 21, carry out active warfare in mucha
1919, when Dan Breen, Sean way that then wouldbeno casualties
Treacy, Sean Hogan and myself on our side,that is to say,that there
(of the South Tip Brigade, was to be noneof our men killed or
Irish Republicail Army)were "on taken prisoners He said this was
the run," we were awakened out necessary.becalmsthe Government
of our sleep one night In Mrs. was anxiousthat no military action
Roland's house, In Dublin. by the shouldbetracedto Its authorityor to
sound of tramping footsteps and the I.R.A., andthat if an attackcould
loud voiceson the stairs. be tracedto the I.R.A. theymightfind
Theleaderat theInvadingpatty was it necessaryto repudiateus. Mr. de
Michael Collins.who explainedthat Valerahadnothingto dowith thisdecision
they hadmade goodnoiseto show beingIn gaolat the time.
they wee friends-a wiseprecaution We acceptedtheseterms,althoughI
The soundof stealthy footstepswas they openedup very unpleasantpassibilities
alwaysthe signalfoe us to get cur for us, for we wouldthenbe
guns,In caseof surpriseby theenemy outlawedby the British,repudiatedby
Mick soonlet us knowthe objectof our own Government,and alsomight
hisvisit,saying "Get up at once,you sufferthe censureof the Church.
are to ambushLordFrench." At first OnFriday.the 19thDecember,1919
we thoughthe wasjoking,but he explainedthepartydrawnfromtheA.S.U.of the
that hehadreceivedwordthat various battalions. including Dan
Lord trench was to drive to Dublin Breen. Tracy. Hogan and myself.
Castleat 5 o'clockthefollowingmorning and numberingin all eleven men,procededto Ashtownto carry out the
SoTreacy,HoganandI tookup cur attack on the Viceroy. Our information
positionin Church Lane,off Dame wasthat LordFrenchwouldcome
street awaiting the comingof Lord by train to Ashtown at 11.40a.m.,
French, trying meanwhileto follow andthat hewouldnotgoonto Broadstone
our instructionsto keepon the move, but wouldleavethe train there.
yet remainon the spot-not a very and travel by motorto the Viceregal
easything to do. At differentpoints Lodge.
all alongthe routementrain all parts We rodeout the CabraRoadonour
of the country,who had come to bicycles,cyclingtwo by two,andI remember
Dublinfor an Army Convention.were that Martin Savagesangall
stationed,someof whomwereto take the Way,amonghis songsbeing."A
part in the attack. end otherswho soldier'slife, the life for me.a soldier's
were to cover the retreat of the death,soIreland'sfree"'
attackers.BARRICADING THE ROAD.
Arrivedat Kelly'spublichouse,Ashtown,whichstandsabouttwohundred
yardsfromAshtownStation.andabout100yardsfrom thePhoenixPark gate,PaddyDaly, whowasin commandofthe party, gaveuscur instructionsAlargebodyof menstandingaboutthe
roadwouldbe sureto attract attention.sowe wereto goInto the publichouse
and mingling with the customers,ordersomeminerals,as if we
were cyclistspassingalongthe road.
Lord Wretchseemedto havebad a Shortly beforethe train was due to
charmedlife, andalthoughplanswere arrive,we were to line the insideof
madelater to kidnaphimandholdhim thehedgeontherightbandsideof the
as hostagefor Eamon de Valera, road for about thirty yards. Breen
presidentof the Republic,who was Martin Savageand Tom Keoghwere
thenin prison,he was always.ableto to bar4cade the road at the last
slipthroughourhands. moment,by drawinga countrycart,
But Lord Frenchnever came,and
we learnedafterwards
that our informationwaswrong,andthat hehadno
intentionofpassing
through DensStreetthat morning.ThomasMacCurtain,
later the Lord Mayor of Cork,was with us that morning,and I remember
rememberhis sayingto me afterwardsthat the only goodthing about theambushwas that ha was givena revolver,
whichhe had not beenableto
getbefore.
Which stoodby, acroesthepathof thecomingcars. This had tobe done inorder to slowdownthe,speedof thecars, which always,travelled at aterrificrate. Breenandhis two comrades
had to do this with an sir ofInnocenceor stupidity,becauseif theylookedtoo business-likeaboutit theymightrousethe suspicionsof someofthe peoplein the publichouse.
A PROPOSAL.The usualorderin whichthe Viceregal
party travelledwasfirsta motorcar carrying Lord Wretch'sarmedescort,then the car in which LordFrenchsat andthenanothercarrying
the restof hisescort. Daly instructedusnot to attackthethe car.
The look-outsbroughtus wardthatthe train wassignalled,andwe movedquietly and quickly to our allottedpoetsalong the Insideof the hedge,keepingoutof sight In orderto preventpreventcivilian casualties,men wereplacedat the n roads,whosedutyit was to preventpeoplewalkingintoour rangeof fire.
Realisingthat Daly mightnot havegiven cool considerationat thiseleventhhour to a proposalI hadmadeto him,I madeup mymindthatI wouldwithholdmy bombuntil afterthe secondcar wasdealtwith. I feltwith absolutecertainty that if thisprecautionwere not taken,our wholeaction mightbe marred by heavycasualtiesonourside,andour instructions
from G.H.Q.were that we wereto avoidcasualties.D.M.P. MAN INTERFERES.
Thecarswerestartingfromthestation.The time bad comefor the road
party to get Into action, and theybeganslowlyto pull the countrycartacrossthe road,to blockthe way ofthe viceregalparty. Whilethe7 weredoingthis a D.M.P. man appearedsuddenlyonthe scene,and,takingbarricadersfor countrymenengagedin their work, beganto argue withthem thernthey couldnot bring theircart that way,Feigningstupidityandobstinacy,andnot wantingto havestusslewith the policeman,our mentried to carry on with their duty,butthe policeman,explaining that thepassagemust be kept clear for "his.Excellency."could not bemperauadedto move.
At this pointoneof our party settledsettledthe argumentby throwingtheonly missilehe had at the policeman,namely,a bomb. Of eoursehe hadnot drawnthe pin from the bomb,sothat therewasnodangerof its exploding
and injuring him or any ofour men. This Surprise attackthrew the policemanInto confusion,but also confusedour barricadingparty, and almost at the samemomentthe Viceroy'scarecameinto
The cars cameclosetogetheras Ibadhoped,andimmediatelytheactionbegan. All of ourmen,rememberingtheir instructions,concentratedtheirattack on the secondcar, in whichlard Wrench was thought to betravelling. I, however, side-Steppedordersand, waiting until the secondcar had beenbombedout of action,hurledmy bombat thefirst car WhateffectmybombhadI neverbeardwithany certainty, but the ear boundedaway,orashingpastthe alightbarricade.
It wasdiscoveredafterwardsthatcontrary to the usual custom,LordWrenchwasseatedin the first, insteadof in the Secondcar.
CASUALTIES.Immediatelyafter bombing,I rushed
to the end of the line, at the mainroad, our weak flank, when DanBreen, Martin Savage and,I think,Keoghwerestandingwithoutcover.Iwas anxiousto make surethat therewouldbeno enfiladingof our lines.
Now the third car, the rear of theescort,camedashingalongat a furiousour pace, bumpingover andpushingaside obstacleson the road, theoccupantspreparedto defend theirchargewith their lives. This was anopencar. Its fire took toll of outparty.
In the beck of the car stoodasoldier,with his legsbracedbetweenthe seats,his rifle held tight to hisshoulderwith the left hand,and hisright hand working evenly, almostgracefully,on the bolt and trigger.This soldier was a sharp-shooter.His first shotgaveyoungMartin Savage
hisdeathwound;the secondwentthroughBreen'sLet, grazinghishead.and the third bit Breen In the leg,woundinghim seriously.Breen,nowout of action, limped painfully tocoverIn the public-housedoor,and amilk-Cart which, fortunatelyfor me,camealongthe mainroadat thismomentmomentprovidedcoverfrom which tocontinuethe attack. I was sorryforthat but I had neitherthetimenortheinclinationto considerhispointof view.
The secondcar had been badly,damagedby our fire and couldnotproceedany farther, and as his comrades
had fled, leaving him to outmercy,the soldierwhohadbeendriving
it walkedout with his bandsup.The ambushwas over. All our partycameout on the main road,and thesoldierwasdisarmed He wastrembling
said evidently expectedto beshot; but we treatedhim with everycourtesy.He wasobviouslysurprisedandrelievedwhensomeonesaid: "Weare soldiers,too,anddonotshootunarmed
prisoners."
ON BIOYOLES.Savage had been killed outright,
shotthroughthe throatby the sharpshooter. We debated whether weshouldtake his bodyaway
with us,but it was decidedthat it wouldbeimpossibleat that time, as we hadonly bicycles,andwe had a woundedman to bring to safety. Tracy and
behindthe others,untilBreenwasgot away.
Breenwas vary weak from loneofblood,andhislegwasuseless,sothathe couldneither walk nor cycle byhimself. He was heapedon to hisbicycle,and Paddy Daly; ridinghisownbicycle,andsupportingBreen
onthe other, started on a difficultandperilousjourneyto reachthehouseofMrs. Tourneyof
Phlbeborough.Later
we learned that Daly and FrankThorntonandothersgot our woundedcomradethee in safety, but it wasmorethan a monthbeforeBreenwasableto moveaboutwithoutaveistanoe
As soonas theremainder
ofourparty weresafelyaway.TreacyandI
pumpedon ourbicycles,andstartedtoride at top speedfrom Ashtown,forwe knewthat,the districtwould soonbe swarmingwith British militarysearchingfor the I.R.A. We cycledalongthepathin casewe shouldmeetwith a military lorry or armedmotorcyclist,as it wouldbe easierfor us inthis way to get acrossa hedgeandthroughthe
-asidein caseof an encounter.
BORROWEDMACHINE
Unfortunately
I had hardlystartedwhenant of my pedalsstrucka stone,andcameoff; so.tbna4g my bicycleover a hedge,I got on the back ofTreacy'sMachine. The
bumpingoverstonesmade me pressdown on therearmudguard,andtreaty soonfoundhe couldmakeno progress, Luckilyfor
us a mar
sameinto view,wheeling
a brandnew machine, andPolitelybut firmlywe toldhim that we wouldhaveto borrowit from himfor a fewhours. Ha was very Indignant,andobviouslydid not believeme whenIpromisedthat it wouldbe left for himat a certain place and at a certainhour that evening I beardafterwards
that thismanwas an R.I.C.pensioner.The bicycle was handedaver to the DublinA.S.U. to returnitas beattheycould.
With the unwillinghelpof that ex-policeman I was able to resume.
my
JourneyInto town with SeenTreacyand at last we arrivedat Lynch's
(Continuedassent Colman)
Doiphin'sBarn. Thinkingat the time
that Breenwouldbein Grantham St,wherehis danceslived,we
darednotgo
at onceto 71 HaytesburyStreet.ourDublinH.Q. fortear of
drawingtoo
muchattentionto the district, Afterawashand shavewe wentout
to enjoythesensation ceasedby theattack
on the Viceroy Very soonwild rumourswerecirculatingthroughDublin.ant we, who had been
onthe
spot
reallybollsved that Lord Frenchandhiscar had-beenblownto hitsat
Ashtown
I am aurathat hewasas
delightedaswe were disappointedthatthis was not. really the case,but,
althoughthe actionwas notsuccessful
in oneway. it certninlycalied a
Panicin Hritish GovernmentClrules.
SENATORSEUMASROBINSON.
GENERAL ORDERS No. 15.
The economic as well as the efficient working of the Army demands at
the present moment that each area shall not only supply it's own quota of
men for it's protection, but also funds for the proper arming and
I administration of it's forces. More and more, as the Army settles to it's
work, will each brigade require more financial resources, however small,
and no Central or Headquarters fund can possibly - not to say economically -
provide for the whole country.
Acting in this spirit, one of our principal fighting brigades realised
in a three night collection over the whole of it's area the sum of £5,000.
Each Brigade Commandant shall forthwith arrange for a concentrated
collection covering, say, three or four particular days, not necessarily
consecutive, during which each company will cover it's own area. The
appeal should be made somewhat in the spirit of the following copy of a
leaflet, and a leaflet on these lines should be made and distributed:-
"A collection 5s being made in this area by permission of G.H.Q. of
our army, to enable us to carry on the work of arming the Volunteers in
this Brigade, and so sustaining and increasing the fight waged against
the enemy here.
"You are asked to subscribe a fair amount. It is for your own
protection, as well as for the National good. The enemy forces are
running loose wherever they get an opportunity. They are murdering
defenceless people. They are pillaging, burning, outraging, wherever
they go. Arms are needed to meet them and to beat them. Money is
required to get the arms. That is the plain statement of the case. It
is no appeal. It is a just request to every man and woman who believes
in Ireland to help the Army of Ireland to carry on the fight.
"During the next week, collectors appointed by the O/C. of your area
will call on you."Signed and issued by O/C. Tipp. No. 3. Brigade".
This collection should be made thoroughly. None but declared enemies
should be left unapproached. ....
"Tipperary No. 3. Brigade.
26-9-20.
"Re yours to the Chief of staff.
Richard Mulcahy, one of the ablest members of the murder sang.See Appendix B.
For God's sake, Dan, have a bit of sense.
What the hell do you or I need to care about the Dublin Corporation? Besides,
Dan, the evidence that Beatie really was there to burn the Town Pall wouldn't
hang a cat in any court of iustice,
This appears to refer to the burning of Tipperary Town Hail sometime previously.
Of course he may really have been on
of the bunters and the Corporation may be wrong, but is that any reason why
everyone in the army
The I.R.A.
should get out and leave it. all to the Dublin Corporation
I should think not. Try to reconsider the whole matter and let me know. I'll
hold over your resignation until I hear from you. E. Dwyer is resigning because
there is too much fight. He thinks the enemy's way of burning is aknockouts
blow to active service. I felt like chucking it myself because likeyourself I
think things are too slow and that we should burn England, but there is such a
lot of terror creeping into the Republican Ranks that my monkey is up and I will
see matters through this crisis if I can. Re yours to myself. I quite agree
with you, Dan, and I don't at all think your idea a bit too wild. As to your
suggestion of a South Tip. Contingent going to England, I'll speak to C.H.Q.
the matter. However, I believe G.H.Q. is quite alive to facts. They don't
want to start till the world sees England's acts clearly. That takes a little
time, I assure you. Write soon, cheerio."
My signature Smody anSupproessed
SR
Theargenal of Nearto wasleft Catrinotafterthe wopeofjoury & Brien
fromHowards,&PropanecornollanwasMourdered
Thisa anotherof/Os Mutinous monopulstownofWodenesI MoleE O'DwyerDeathe
1-DaaraJogo)Westit wereEdwardDwyertoCoothurstMonasDwyer (Roanches)MurdurowbyIRW
Locourtwackness.