+ All Categories
Home > Documents > )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

)ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

Date post: 06-Jan-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
• •! (7,p• so..,"L/2 0CJ ("T I I~Y SUN TED STATES NAVY )ROJECT SQUID TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM No. CAL-27 VALVELESS PULSE ET INVESTIGATIONS 0ANT I TESTS OF SMALL SCALE MODELS By 'OSEPH G, LOGAN, JR. ~ LE.. MAY 1949 A CORNELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY F This dn•xunr, d: •,-••• , ip, FILE COPY 8
Transcript
Page 1: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

• •! (7,p• so..,"L/2

0CJ ("T I I~Y

SUN TED STATES NAVY

)ROJECT SQUID

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM No. CAL-27VALVELESS PULSE ET INVESTIGATIONS

0ANT ITESTS OF SMALL SCALE MODELS

By

'OSEPH G, LOGAN, JR.

~ LE.. MAY 1949

A CORNELL

AERONAUTICAL LABORATORYF This dn•xunr, d: •,-••• ,

ip, FILE COPY 8

Page 2: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

9/15/49

CORNELL AEIONXLUTICAL LABORATORY, INC.Buffalo, New York

ERRATA

for

Squid Technical Memorandum CAL-27 entitled, "Valveless PulseJeb Investigations, Part I, Tests of Small Scale Models" by

Joseph G. Logan, Jr° dated May 1949

Page 8 - s 13 and 15 - should read square inch gage instead ofjquare in gage

Page 13 - Reference (2) - should read Project Squid Annual ProgramReport, (Description oi pressure gage developed byNew York University) p. 17, January 1, 1948

Figure 5,Page 20 should read "Variation of Specific Impulse with Tailpipe

Length for 3.0 inch Diameter Combustion Chamber" instead ofF"i e -i--tion of Specific Impulse with Tailpipe Length"

I Figure 6,

Page 21 should read "Variation of Specific Impulse with TailpipeLength for 3.50 inch Diameter Combustion Chamber" instead of"Variation of Specific Impulse with Tailpipe Length"

Page 3: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

Report No. DD-420-A-27Contract No. N6orl-119NR 220-041

Copy No.'"f

CORNELL AER4ONAUTICAL LABORATORY, INC.BUFFALO 21, NEW YORK

SQUID TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM No. CAL-27

VALVELESS PULSE JET INVESTIGATIONSPART I '

TEST OF SMALL SCALE MODELS

FI

By

JOSEPH G, LOGAN, JR.

MAY 1949

y-..t'' t .". • "

Page 4: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

CORNELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY, INC.Buffalo, New York

CONTENTS

Page N~o.

SUMMARY 1

INTRODUCTION 2

EXPLORATCRY EXPERIMENTS ES

INFUECE OF TUBIE GzOmrT.ff 6MEASUREMETS OF MASS FLOW AND INLET AIR PRESSURE

DETER•MINATION 0F JET FREqMECY 9

SCHLIZREN OBSERVATIONS OF A TWO-DIMSFSIONAL MODEL07 THE VALVELIESS JET 10

CONCLUS IONS 11

PLANS FOR IMM WORK 12RE1RN ZS 13

APPEDIX 114

rIOmmS 16

Page 5: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

'-07MP 9WMV4LP MINr4CORNILL AEROXAUTICAL LABORATORY, INC.

Buffalo, New York

SLIMMALRY

The results of tin investigation of small valveless intermittent

engines are described. These experiments were undertaken to determine if

i thrust and specific impulse values were appreciably affected by changes

in fuel, methods of fuel injection and duct geometry.

SThe tIests appear to con'Lim the exproetation that high apecifle

Impulse values are obtainable with valveless engines. Mean values of

approximately 2200 seconds were obtained in the tests. The experiments

) indicate, also, that an optimum configuration exists for each particular

fuel and method of fuel injection.

I:

Page 6: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

C0RNCLL A3RONAUTICAL LABORATORY, INC.Buffalo, New York

INTR0IUJCTION

Preliminary experiments conducted with valveless intermittent

engines were reported in Reference 1. Farther analysis, based upon a number

of assumptions whose validity remains to be verified, revealed that the

valveless pulse Jet., even aside from its obvious advantage of simplicity, is

potentially a more efficient power plant than either the pulse jet or ram jet,

at least for certain specific applications. One of the most interesting of the

applications consists of using a valveless pulse jet as a power plant for the

jet-propelled helicopter. It appears :hat the valveless pulse jet will in

this connection, have the following advantages over a conventional pulse jet

engine:

1. Greater simplicity

2. Longer operating opfe

3. Greater flexibility of operation

4, Considerably better fuel economy

It also appears that the valveless pulse jet will possess one major advantage

over the conventional ram-jet engines considerably better fuel economy within

the conventional helicopter rotor top speed range of 400 to 600 feet per

second.

The mean pressures obtained as the result of an intermittent burning

process in a partially opened tube are influenced by fuel characteristics and

methods of fuel injection. Since the wave motion in these engines is es-

tablished as a result of the intermittent combustion, it is to be expected

that fuel characteristics as wll as methods of fuel injection will also

influence the optimum tube design.

4-

Page 7: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

COENXL AERONAUTICAL L&BORATORY, INC.Buffalo, New York

If it is possible to determine a tube design yielding the maximum

effects of these waves, such a tube should yield much higher values of specific

impulse than are obtained at the present time. Engines depending upon such

wave effects should prove to be sensitive to changes in overall configuration.

An optimum tube design should exist for a given set of operating conditions

and a change in any single condition should then require a change in overall

configuration to obtain optimum thrust and specific impulse values.

At the present time it is not possible to predict by theoretical

methods the influence of the several operating variables upon overall jet

operation. This memorandum describes the initial series of experiments con-

ducted with small valveless engines to determine:.

1. To what extent thrust and specific impulse values are

appreciably affected by small changes in overall

configuration

2. If an optimum tube configuration exists for a given

set of operating conditions

3. Whether changes In fuel characteristics and methods

of fuel injection require corresponding changes in

duct configuration for maximum thrust and specific

impulse values.

I. If high specific impurlse values can be obtained with

engines of this type as a result of variations in

overall configuration.

-3-

Page 8: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

OORNELL AERONAUTICAL LA2ORATORYI, INCOBaffal , New York

EXPLORATORY MEZ RIMENTS

Exploratory experiments were first undertaken to determine if

changes in fuel!, methods of fuel inJe-tion and duct configuration procuced

the expected large variations in thrast a•ul spe:.fio impulse.

An experimental valveless engine was constructed having a combustion

chamber 3 inches in diameter and a ,aiLpjpe lo5 inches in diameter (Fig. i).

This tailpipe, with a straight exit, was varied in' length from A6 zo 22 inches0

In order to det.ermine the effect of different methods of fuel injection, two

systems were utilized. The air and fael were premixed and injected through

the same inlet, or injected separately, without premixing. it the exploratory

series, tests were conducted wit.h propane and gasoline,

The model was moaunted cn Lhe small thrust stand shcwrn in Fig. 2.

Thrust readings were obtained with a small spring balance. In all tests,

corrections were made for the thzust contr~bc-ed by the continuous air supply,

Propane consumption was determ:ned witn a standard rotameter. At the time these

tests were conducted2 a smali. rotameter was not availabil for the determination

of gasoline consumption, Fuel flow was determined by timing tie rate of con-

sumption in a calibrated glass tube. In later tests., in order to observe tne

effects of a different type of hydrocarbon fuel, methane was used,

Table 1, Appendix A, shows the effect of changes in fuel, fuel

injection methods and taaipipe length upon thrast and specific impulse. It

may be observed that marked changes in specific impulse values occur as a

result of changes in any one of these parameters. For these configurations

maximum specific impulse values were obtained with separate air and fuel

injection.

Page 9: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

CORNELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY, INC.Buffalo, New York

Vp. Xous types of exit configurations were tested (Fig. I) to

dete-' r.ý if similar marked changes in specific impulse occurred. In these

tests combustion chamber diameters of 3.0 e-id 3.5 inches werir used. Typical

results of these measurements are shown in Table 2. With one combination,

using a slightly flared exit, a mean specific impulse value of 2150 pounds

thrust pe- pounds fuel per second was obtained. This value was obtained

v41 h u combustion cclambez diameter of 3.5 inches, The sensitivity of the Jet

w) :.! -,ges in cierall configuration is demonstrated by the decrease in specific

Alse values from 2150 to 1300 seconds when the diameter of the Jet corn-

bustion chamber was re:uced to 3.0 inches.

In order to compare the results of these tests with the specific

4mpulse values obtained from a rmall pulse jet, tests were conducted with the

dynaJet, Table 3. In this jet the fuel, gasoline, was premixed with the air

before entering the combustion chamber. Averae specific impulse values of

1200 seconds were obtaines. Attempts to operate this Jet with propane wereno' successtlal.

The flapper valves were removed and replaced by a flat plate. feast

were conducted with propane and gasoline, Table 4. It may be observed that

maximum specific impulse valus were obtained using prepane, with the air and

fuel premixed. With the experimental model separate air and fuel injection,

in all cases, yielded maximum a-pecific impulse values.

-5

Page 10: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

0O0RELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY2 INC.Buffalo, New York

INLUNCE OF TUBE GEOUETRY

The exploratory experiments indicat.ed that large variations in

specific impulse values could be obtained as a result of varying fuel,

methods of fuel injection and tube g6ometryo Tests were then conducted to

determine if an optimum configuration existed for a given fuel and method of

fuel injection.

Models were constructed with combustion-chamber diameters varying

from 2.5 to 140 inches. Prcpane was used with separate air and fuel injection.

Tailpipe lengths were varied from 13 to 15 inches at intervals of 1/4 inch.

Jig. 3 shows the variation of specific impulse with tailpipe length

for various combustion-chamber diameters. For the configurations investigated,

an optimum value appears to exist with a combustion-chamber diameter of 3.5

inches and a 16.0-inch tailpipe. However, it was possible to obtain high

specific impulse values with other configurations.

7or example, a specific impulse value of 1900 seconds was obtained

with a combustion-chamber diameter of 2.5 inches and a relatively short tailpipe

of 114 inches. It is interesting to note that resonance could not be achieved

with this combustion-chamber diameter for tailpipe lengths between 14.5 and

15.25 inches0

It W be observed that for each combustion-chamber diaxmeter a

maximum value of specific impulse is obtained in the range of talilpipe lengths

investigated,

The irregular nature of the specific impulse curves appears to be

typical of this type of device and indicates cxtreme sensitivity to small

6.

or1

-I_ _4n 0-

Page 11: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

COE1LL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY9 INC.Buffalo, New York

changes in configuration. Chenges in tailpipe length as small as 2 per cent

produced changes in specific impulse values as large as 10 per cent.

To determine if a hydrocarbon fuel with different characteristics

would act in a similar manner in these experimental models, tests were conducted

with methane using combustion chambers 3.0 and 3.5 inches in diameter. Mean

specific impulse values of over 2100 seconds were obtained with both combustion-

chamber diameters (Fig. )4). These peak values did not occur at the same tailpipe

length. At a tailpipe length of 16 inches, which yielded the peak value for the

3.5-inch-diameter combustion chamber, the difference ia specific impulse values

was approximately iS per cent.

The specific impulse values obtained using propane and methane, with

combustion-chamber diameters of 3.0 and 3.5 inches , are compared ia Plgso 5 and

6, respectively. For both of these combustion chambers, methane yielded the

largest mean specific impulse values. Although the results of tests using the

3.5-inch-diameter combust•on chamber are similar, large differenc'sin the be-

havior of the two hydrocarbons were observed with the 3oOinch diameter com-

bustion chamber. When methane was used, the specific impulse values increased

as the tailpipe length was increased. With propane, the specific impulse values

decreased. At a tailpipe length of 1".0 inches, methane yielded twice the

specific impulse value obtained wivth propane.

1 - 7 -

-. I

Page 12: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

CORNELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY, rNCo"Buffalo, New York

MEASU1REMNTS OF MASS FLOW AND INLET AIR PRESSURE

To determine the thrust developed per pound of air per second,

measurements of mass flow were made using a calibrated orifice plate. Measure-

ments of total pressure were made at the combustion-chamber air inlet with a

standard pitot tube.

In these Tests a standard 3/8.-inch pipe was used as an air inlet.

Witt the flared 2oO-inch tailpipe, the inlet..exit ratio was 1/19, The variation

of the air specific impulse (pound thrust. per pound air per second) with air-

fuel ratio is shown in Fig, 7. As is indicated, mixtures were much leaner than

stoichiometrico For. both propane and methane the maximum air specific impulse

was obtained with airofuel ratios (by weigh:-) of 32 to 1,

For the configurations investigated, maxim=m specific impulse values

were obtained with total inlet air pressures of 205 pounc per square in gage.

DIuing these tests, total lnlet, air pressures varied from 1 to 6 pounds per

square in gage.

Page 13: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

I

CMELL AERONAUTICAL LA3ORATORY, INC.Buffalo, New York

I3TERMINATION OF JET FRQUeCY

In previous experimentsI it was observed that two stable

operating frequencies were obtainable for a given configuration as a result

of variation in air-fuel ratio.

In order to determiine the frequencies of operation and pressure

variation in the combustIor chamber, a combustion chamber 4 Inches in diameter

with a 16-inch tailpipe was modified and a YUL condenser-type pressure gage 2

was mounted as shown in Figo I0 ý H

Measurements of frequency for this configuration indicated that at j

the lean limit the frequoncy of operation was 130 cycles per second. At

mixtures near stoichiometric; the frequency ýf operation was 100 cycles. Curves

of pressure vnriation for these freqaencies are shown in Fig. S. Fig. a indi-

cates that the time of rise to peak pressure was approximately the same for

both frequencies.

The difference in frequency was due to the difference in time required

for 'blowdown" from the two pressure levels. Since the peak pressures obtained

were due only to change in fuel-air ratio, there may be a significant change in

burning properties at the lean fuel-air ratios in this type of r4et.

-9-

Page 14: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

COENmLL AERONAUTICAL LABORAT01V INC.Buffalo, New York

SCHLIEREN OBSSRVATION OF A TWO-DIMENSIONALMOlEL OF THE VALVELESS JET

In order to study the fuel-injection process and the combustion

phenomena, a two-dimensional rectangular model was constructed as shown in

Jig, 11. The area ratios were based upon the ratios used for the experimental

model with 3,O-inch-diameter combustion chadmber (Pig. 9). Vicor glass was used

for the transparent sidewalls°

High-speed motion pictures (4000 frames per second) indicated that anintermittent fuel-and alr-injection process occurred, This may offer a partial ]

explanation for the stability of an 6ntermiztent burLning process. Various

stages are shown in Fig, 12. The film speed was not great enough ýo yield

de-tal the combufttion prhenomena;.

With this rectangular je-, extreme starting difficulties occurred,

When resonance wae ebtained,, the re: <tant thrust values were small. The reason

for this effect of the rectangular shape of the combust:on chamber on the behavior

of the valveless pulse jet has not yet been expIa._&i a-though it has been sug-

gested by Dr. G. Marksteir of th:s Laboratory that the periodic shape distcztion

resulting from the flexibility of flat walls may affect the wave phenomena and,

perhaps, the shape of the flame front.

- 10 -

Page 15: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

* - - * ...C * • • , '• •. -.,l.,. _-

-7 _

CODELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY, INC.Raffalo, New York

Li

CONCLUSIONS

These experiments, althr-ah of an exploratory nature oaly, tend

to confirm the assumption that relatively high values of specific impulse nay7

be obtained with valveless eng~nes. Although it is not believed that an

optimum confignuratt.en was established ir, these teast, mean specific immulse

values of approximately 2200 were obtained. for applications in which the

inlet losses of mass and momentum may be reduced appreciably , the valveless

pulse Jet, at high subsonic MaCn numbe:s, should yield values of specific

impulse appreciably h tgher thaL tnose obtained with conventional pulse-jet

I or ram-jet engines at the present time. This engine, therefore, appears to

be a very promisirng propulsicn unl, 14

Tests indicate that the valveless intermittent engine is extremely

sensitive to small changes in overall configaration and appear tc 'onfirm the

belief that an optimum configuration exists for a given set of operating

conditions.

The results of these tests appear to have a special significance

with regard to inr'esigat!onR undertaken to determine the influence of any

single parameter upon the tbrust and specific impulse values. In order to

determine if any significant increases in thrust and specific impulse are

obtainable as a result of change in operating conditions, it would be necessary

to conduct tests with numerous overall configurations,

- 11 -

Page 16: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

CORMELL AERONAUTICAL LABORATORY, INCo

PLANS JOR Y¶TUI WORI

io Simi.lar experiments w~i be :orduc•.ed w:th gasoline

to investigate *he effects of changes in jet con-

figuraticn and me6hods of fuel injection,

2. The two-dImensional m~odei will be modified to improve

ine puisatir-g ccmbibs:ion, azd spa:k photography will

be• s;e s tu.d c" 3m busth'-.- phenomena.

A 12-

Page 17: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

II

CO)IqELL AXRO•JAUTIGAL LAEOEATORY, INC.Duffalo, New York

Logan, J., and Pinamore, 0o, Pro~ec. Squid Technical Memorandum No.CAL-20o April 2., 1948

Pro~ect Squid AniaaL Prog.t. Repor, January. 1949

- 13-

-- --- i- _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Page 18: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

?I

OODIuL AsROnAuTICAL L•nBOnTORY, DC.Buffelc New Tork

APPDMIX A

Table 1

Experimental Model!- Combustion Chamber 3.0 Inches in Diameter, Straight Tailpipe

TAILPIPI THRUST SOPCIFIC IMPULSEI1L INGTH IN. LBS. LBS. THRUST/LBS 7L PER SEC.

(a) air and fuel premixed

gasoline 8 o.69 550gasoline 16 .81 700gasoline 19 .01 600gasoline 22 .69 550

propane 8 100 850

(b) separate air and fuel injection

propane 8 1.95 1100propane 16 2.95 1550propane 22 2.0 950

Tab•b I

Ziperimental Model Taael, Propane Separate Air and Ftel Injection

THRUST SPECIFIC IMPULS

LTAIPIP LBS. LBS. THRUST/LB IL PER SMC.(a) 3.5 inch diameter combustion chamber

1)2.5 21502.7T6 160

7 3.25 1350(b) 3.0 Inch diameter combustion chamber

D 2.5 1300

Table 3

•naaet with Fl)iper Yalves - fuel, gasoline - Air and ftel Premixed

THRST SPECIFIO IMPULS3LBS, LBS. THRJT/Las , L Pn sic.

2.75 1200

rin all tests fuel pressures varied between 4 and 12 lbs.

-lit -. .

+-++'+ •+'•--: :+•+ P+-++'• ,'..• -+• "-"+"++•.. . .... :+•:°'•"+I''+ : ++- rt- •%"-'- " + • " • •+Z'"

Page 19: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

O0MMLL ASONAUTICAL LABORATORY9 INC.Bhffaloo lew Tork

Table 4

Dynajet - Flapper Valves Replaced by a Flat Plate

THRUST SPIYIC IMPULSE 1ImLBS. LBS. THRST/L3 lWlL PIR 810.

(a) air and fuel premixed

gasoline 1.05 1100

propane 1.7l5 1290

(b) separate air and fuel injection

propme 2.25 950

-15-

Page 20: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

-, ~ -'~~ ~FZ~.F ' ¶ 7 O-z~ .0-e-

0I0I

0 0j

- I4 -

0

0w 0

0-0

.K )

ww00o&

a--

16..

Page 21: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

°I11

DIAGRAM OF THRUSTMEASURING APPARATUS

SSPARK

Z--FUEL INLET

IIIR NL SPRING

Fig. 2

- 17 -S.. . . . .. . • J

Page 22: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

U)f) -

ww

- ~i _

02

(L-J _ - -- -)

Is _

a:I to it~ Ino9InM D-13d -SUW IL---r 01-dS

4L _j~- - h- J- -h

0 - -

z- -

f? a . I -I-.- I I -J--- ---4-

>8 1 C L3Sflft Oi:Ld dc ~ ldl CLIOdInA zii

7UiI7ZZ~iZj2; J

Page 23: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

_ _ _ _ _- ---------

- I ___________ 1.1

zG -.- I

L a.

U.~i # o =. - -

0 ul --L -.9L

2I 2

'Vi --n 9i in i sol _ _nicNJI

4419.

Page 24: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

751-I.-U17

a- a. 0 r

.In -j4 z~

* .

-~ I Y

- 2 10

-Y N -

ca o 1n ,snm m)3Inw 110d

cn~~~2 I

Page 25: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

rI

1� -

� � -i--i--I t--i*-�*- 1--

liii I,-l�-.i---J-�-.t--- -.-- --

I I I...t --i.�.i- -- i-i ___I

-V7iL.� II

--I-- -- ��1��

I __

I _ I

-- -� --

t-.� -. a-I I �-tI -

-J

______ ________

U,

CD jE%��* IN' f.�K

U) -- I i ___ *1�

w -.

I. _____ .till'-' __

I.'I I ______ II

VI -

x �D

(I) -l

-I -

I___

w

,�Ol 4. W

____ I

j . . I i -J

H .1 0�I-

________________ I

*I_____________4 I, -j------r---�--

- -

- - I KiI {-I *1

777771- - -

* � c�i

I -

� I � I

- -.-

-

1 --

__________ + I

IIA I--I-I - --

_- -

-�--¾-----I-------t-----i*--**--- -

I It

TI 1 .7�i _

Ii�__ _80 0088888880@�

0

t.

*

V�

t

30

.�

(�3S �3d �3I14 *9 / IS(WHJ. *SU�) 3S�fldVII �tdIO3dS

a __________

..

�k.2z'- � -' -

Page 26: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

IJ T

.4 .

0.0

CLIQ-to

U- N- --- t- 4i

LL. IL-- - 4 4 - --

3 NVd4J.3 -0 N13 0OII40I10i

-- T

CDF.- (0 W

'03S H~d VIV 'S~l /lSnHI~i S111 3SlfldvI 01.4I3dS tVV

Page 27: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

0 ;_I

PRESSURE VAR:ATION iN 4.0 INCHDIAMETER COMBUSTION CHAMBER

-4--

I ---eu' -! I t I-

'÷i I I + I ii

/!t i - ' -t

--1 -- .. . . ... II'- - - + . . ...-. •. . . . . .- -

, III

wt

h___ _i_ _ I_ _ .. .�. .. . - f,,It - I _

S. ... I-• . .. 4 ... . -~-- -... .- 1 ...: 1 .I.z

I/ I /I

f 130 CYCLE

7j~ ~ ____ f180CYCLE

---1 - ,.+.-

-- I -a -I + -,

r -' i i

TIME

Fig. 5

I'*

Page 28: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

cI.

0 L

U)J

0

LI-

Page 29: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

LI

Y~z00

0

0

z0

0:

Q:1

A -~ ~ -.---- ~ -,

Page 30: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

r II

Iii

w

Lii,00

w

0-

zw

Page 31: )ROJECT SQUID - apps.dtic.mil

!' S rA(;[ ""IN INTERMITTEENT

Ai*r- FUEL INJECTION PROCESS

Q b

c d

e

Fig. 12


Recommended