Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | veronica-wilson |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Role of Foundation Consultants in optimizing time and cost
in large projects – Case Studies
Prof. V.S.Raju
(Formerly: Director, IIT Delhi & Professor and Dean, IIT
Madras)
Email: [email protected]. V.S. Raju
Engineers Day, 15.09.2015
Geotechnical Engineering Practice
S.No Best Practice(Mostly followed by developed world)
Most Situations in India at present
After Site Selection
1Contour Survey Sometimes available
2Geology of site by expert By the Geotechnical Agency
as part of the Geotechnical Investigation
3Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation by an accredited Agency
Rarely Done
2Prof. V.S. Raju
Geotechnical Engineering Practice Contd…
3
S.No Best Practice(Mostly followed by developed world)
Most Situations in India at present
4. Project layout with location of important structures made available to Geotechnical consultant.
Generally not made available to Investigation Agency
5.Scope of Detailed Geotechnical Investigation:
Geotechnical Consultant in Consultation with structural consultant and on the basis of structural details.
• Not the common practice.• Most often a bill of quantities
and a standard set of laboratory tests are given to the agency by Architect/Structural Designer.
• Inappropriate also because the laboratory tests are a function of the type of soil strata.
Prof. V.S. Raju
Geotechnical Engineering Practice Contd…
4
S.No Best Practice(Mostly followed by developed world)
Most Situations in India at present
6. • Detailed Soil Investigation by an accredited and qualified investigation agency.
• Investigations done under independent supervision by a qualified person.
• Lack of accreditation process.
• Most investigation agencies are not accredited.They do not have trained manpower.
• Mostly not supervised
7.Investigation report by the agency giving the results of field and laboratory tests only. No Foundation Recommendations.
Report containing• Results of Field and
Laboratory Tests• Recommendations for
Foundations• Safe Bearing Capacity and
Pile Capacities without having full details of the structures
Prof. V.S. Raju
Geotechnical Engineering Practice Contd…
5
S.No Best Practice(Mostly followed by developed world)
Most Situations in India at present
8. Interpretation of the results by a Specialist Foundation Consultant and recommendation for type of foundation and foundation parameters.
Very rarely the case.Investigation Agency hardly has qualified and experienced Foundation Engineers.
9. Interaction between Foundation and Structural Consultant and finalisation of Foundation Design.
Mostly Absent.
Prof. V.S. Raju
6
S.No Ideal/ International Practice
Most Situations in India at present
10. Involvement of Foundation Consultant during execution, review of results of further tests.Ex. Pile Load Tests (Initial & Routine)
Very Rare.
11. Settlement Observations and information to Foundation Consultant.
Very Rare.
12. Foundation Performance assessment and report by Foundation Consultant
Absent.
Geotechnical Engineering Practice Contd…
Prof. V.S. Raju
World StandardWorld StandardIndiaIndia
o Poor quality of the equipment.
o Shell & Auger, Wash Boring is also common
o SPT Equipment - manual operation
o Static cone penetration equipment with Mechanical cone.
o Highly sophisticated and mechanised equipment.
o Continuous core sampling (in soils as well).
o SPT equipment with automatic hammer release.
o Static cone test with electric cone and piezocone (crucial for assessment of liquefaction)
QUALITY OF INVESTIGATION
7Prof. V.S. Raju
Pic.1.1. Non Standard EquipmentNo safety measures
Pic. 1.2. Global Standard
8Prof. V.S. Raju
Pic. 1.3 SPT Hammer Dropped Manually (2013)
Pic. 1.4. SPT with Auto Trip Hammer+ Standard Rig
9Prof. V.S. Raju
Pic.1.5 Static Cone Penetration - Reaction with Sand bags
Pic. 1.6 Crawler Mounted SCPT Equipment
10Prof. V.S. Raju
CASE STUDIES
Prof. V.S. Raju 11
Delhi International Airport – Terminal T3
Prof. V.S. Raju 12
• Terminal T1 was on Pile Foundation• Soil Investigation report recommends
pile foundation for T3
• EPC contract awarded on the basis of pile foundation.
• Review by Prof. V.S. Raju
13
Terminal T3 at Delhi International Airport, DIAL
Prof. V.S. Raju
Terminal T3 Continued..
• Soil Strata : Sandy silt and silty sand.
• SPT N value at Founding level is 22 to 33 and increases with depth
• For conforming adequacy of raft, 2 footing load tests were done at Founding level.
- Footing size - 1.5 m x 1.5 m
• In first case, settlements (S) at 40 t/m2 is
4 mm
• In second case, S at 38 t/m2 is 5.4 mm.
14Prof. V.S. Raju
Results of Footing Load Tests for Delhi International Airport
1st Footing load test:
Soil type = Sandy silt
SPT N = 50
Size of footing = 1.5 m x 1.5 m
Load Intensity, q = 40 t/m2, S = 4 mm
* 0.82
= 1119 Kg/cm2
As per Shultze and Muhs
For SPT N = 50, Es = 800 Kg/cm2
Ratio = 1119/800 = 1.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 900
5
10
15
20
25
Load Vs Settlement Curve for DIALLoad Intensity (t/m2)
Sett
lem
ent (
mm
)
15Prof. V.S. Raju
2nd Footing load test:
Type of soil = Silt with fine sand
SPT N = 22
Size of footing = 1.5 m x 1.5 m
For Load Intensity,
q = 38 t/m2, S=5.4 mm
* 0.82
= 787 Kg/cm2
As per Shultze and Muhs
For SPT N = 22, Es = 530 Kg/cm2 Ratio = 787/530 = 1.48
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800
5
10
15
20
25
Load Vs Settlement Curve for DIALLoad Intensity (t/m2)
Sett
lem
ent (
mm
)
16Prof. V.S. Raju
Delhi Airport – T3
• Based on these results, Raft Foundation was found fully satisfactory and adopted.
• 6 months of construction Time Saved – A huge advantage, on total investment of 12,000 crores.
• Direct cost savings as well.
• Raft settlements were monitored and were found well with in limits.
17Prof. V.S. Raju
3. Pile Assisted Raft for a 51 Storey Tower at Gurgaon
• High rise tower with 51 storeys and 2 Basements.
• Strata : Predominantly Sandy Silt with water table 25 m below Ground level
• Founding Level: 12 m below Ground Level
• SPT N value is 35 & above below Founding level.
18Prof. V.S. Raju
51 storey building for IREO at Sector 67, Gurgaon (46 storeys completed)
Prof. V.S. Raju 19
Preliminary Design proposed by a Singapore Structural Consultant:
- A Large Piled Raft of size 54 m x 68 m (3672 m2) with 600 mm dia bored piles of varying length
- Total number of piles = 345.
- Total Settlement of the Piled Raft is restricted to 50 mm.
- In Piled Raft, Raft is the main bearing element
and piles are used as settlement reducers.
Pile Assisted Raft for 51 Storey Tower continued….
20Prof. V.S. Raju
Review by Prof. V.S. Raju:
• Additional Investigations were proposed by us with 2 additional boreholes, 50 m depth.
• Fresh Assessment and Analysis led to a solution of reduced raft size and number of piles.
Pile Assisted Raft for 51 Storey Tower continued….
21Prof. V.S. Raju
Revised Pile Assisted Raft Design based on Fresh Analysis:
• Raft Area = 1740 m2 (reduction 50%)• Bored Piles of 600 mm diameter and 18 m
long• Total number of piles = 94 (reduction 70%) • Settlements restricted to 50 mm (as desired
by the client)
Pile Assisted Raft for 51 Storey Tower continued….
22Prof. V.S. Raju
• Approximately 25 % of total load will be transferred to piles from raft.
• Initially load will be predominantly transferred to the piles.
• At allowable settlement of 50 mm, the ultimate capacity of the piles will be fully mobilized.
- Hence Piles are designed for ultimate capacity.
Pile Assisted Raft for 51 Storey Tower continued….
23Prof. V.S. Raju
Settlement Observations.
• Settlements of the tower are monitored at 5 points on the raft.
• As of July 2014, 35 floors are completed
• Estimated load transferred = 47 %
• The maximum observed settlement is only 10 mm.
• FIRST TIME ADOPTION Of PILED RAFT IN INDIA
Pile Assisted Raft for 51 Storey Tower continued….
24Prof. V.S. Raju
Project: Summer Palms, Sector 4A, Bahadurgarh, Haryana.
13 Blocks, G+14
Original Investigation:
- 11 Boreholes
- Strata- Silty sand and sandy silt layers with water table at 2 m below GL.
- SPT N values – 2 to 10 up to 7 m below Ground Level
- Layers up to 7 m below ground level are prone to liquefaction.
- Pile Foundation recommended.25Prof. V.S. Raju
Summer Palms– Artistic View
Prof. V.S. Raju 26
Review by Prof. V.S. Raju
Supplementary Investigation:
• 14 Static Cone penetration Tests (SCPT)
• 8 SCPTs using Mechanical Cone
• 6 SCPTs using Electric Cone with Pore Pressure sensors.
Confirmation of weak strata up to 7 m below ground level.
27Prof. V.S. Raju
Summer Palms continued…
Foundation Adopted:
Vibrostone columns to mitigate liquefaction
and improve soil stiffness
900 mm diameter Stone Columns installed at
2 m c/c spacing using bottom dry feed method
Raft Foundation on improved ground. Trial with Footing load tests on vibro stone columns
- 2 m x 2 m Footing (Single Column)- 4 m x 4 m Footing (4 columns)
SCPT tests between columns after installation.
Significant ground improvement
28
Summer Palms continued…
Prof. V.S. Raju
Settlement Monitoring Points
Monitoring Points
Prof. V.S. Raju 29
Tower No. Current Updates of each Tower Settlement (Measured)
(1st Week-August’15)
(4 points on 4 corners)
Remarks
F G+14 casted and Brickwork is in progress 58 to 60 mm Monitoring started from raft construction
G G+14 casted and Brickwork is in progress 49 to 50 mm Monitoring started after construction of ground floor
H G+5 casted and 6th floor is in progress 24 to 25 mm Monitoring started after construction of Raft
I G+5 casted and 6th floor is in progress 23 to 25 mm Monitoring started after construction of Raft
Settlement observations: Predicted 67 to 75 mm
Prof. V.S. Raju 30
L&T Serene CountyHyderabad
Prof. V.S. Raju 31
Extreme Issue with one of the 10 towers, 14 storeyed
Tower Dimension : 75 m x 30 m
Recommended SBC by the soil Investigation Agency 30 t/m2?
Hard Rock SBC 400 t/m2
Hard Murrum 80 t/m2
Soft Clay 4 m thick0 t/m2
75 m
30 m
Tower Foot PrintProf. V.S. Raju 32
Acknowledgements
33Prof. V.S. Raju
Larsen & Toubro Limited
IREO, New Delhi
UMANG Realtech Pvt Ltd., New Delhi
M/s Keller Ground Engineering India Pvt. Ltd
Who carried out the Ground Improvement and Monitoring Settlements
THANK YOU
Jai Hind
34Prof. V.S. Raju