117 – 19 March 2008
Fast track to Sustainable Mobility
ROLLING STOCK AND THE ADAPTATION OF DIFFERENT ETCS TECHNOLOGIES ON BOARD
José Antonio Jiménez
217 – 19 March 2008
CONTENTS
1. Introduction2. ETCS deployment in Spain3. ETCS onboard equipment4. Homologation and Validation5. Commercial experience with ETCS and STM6. Conclusions
317 – 19 March 2008
1. INTRODUCTION. Signalling scene in Spain before ETCS
Zara
goza Huesca
M. P.PíoM.Pta.Atocha
Segovia
Valladolid
Ávila
Salamanca
Zamora
Palencia
Soria
Logroño
Teruel
PortbouCerbère
Tarragona
Barcelona
Girona
Valencia Nord
Cuenca
Albacete
Cartagena
Alacant T.
Jaén
Córdoba
AlmeríaMálaga
AlgecirasCádiz
HuelvaTérmino
Sevilla
C.Real
Cáceres
Badajoz
Alcázar S.J.
León Vitoria
OviedoSantander
Gijón Cercanías
Irún
HendayaS.Sebastián
PamplonaSantiago
Vigo
A Coruña
Ourense
Lugo
Pontevedra
.
Granada
Mur
cia
Castelló
Lleida P.
Gua
dala
jara
M.Chamartín
Canfranc
Burgos
Bilbao
Conventional lines(gauge 1668 mm)
ASFA Driving Aid system up to 200 km/h. All the Rolling Stock fitted
High Speed lines(gauge 1435 mm) LZB
Continuous supervision and information up to 300 km/h. Rolling Stock fitted: Classes 100, 104 and loco 252 (ASFA is used as a back up system)
EBICAB Automatic Train Protection system up to 220 km/h. Continuous supervision, discontinuous information. Rolling Stock fitted: Classes 101 and 252
417 – 19 March 2008
1. INTRODUCTION. Political situation for ETCS deployment
SPAIN: Relevant Political decisions:
Fitting all new HSL with ETCS L1 & L2Fitting all HST in order to run all over Spain: ETCS L1& L2 and STMsOpen the market: equipments from all the track and onboard suppliersMaintain quality of service standards for high speed
Consequences:Contracts with all UNISIG companiesTarget for commercial operation: full compatibility among HST and HSL
EUROPE:Community Directives developing the Railway liberalization
Railways designed The High Speed European NetworkNew interoperable signalling system was introduced: ERTMS/ETCS
Real interoperability: HST “crossing borders” everyday
517 – 19 March 2008
2. ETCS DEPLOYMENT IN SPAIN
From Unisig to real interoperabilityThe ETCS implementation in Spain proved cross compatibility is real The first ETCS system validation was made under the most complex conditions:
HSL: Madrid-Lleida (part of Madrid-Barcelona line)Trackside equipment: Ansaldo-CSEE TransportHST: Class 102 from Talgo-BombardierOnboard equipment: SiemensSimultaneous validation for vehicle and infrastructure
How did we manage?New validation procedureTest campaign at CEDEX LabHarmonization process involving all suppliersMore than 400.000 km field test
617 – 19 March 2008
2. ETCS DEPLOYMENT IN SPAIN. Infrastructure
High speed linesConventional lines
Gijón
Port Bou
Huelva
CádizMálaga
Algeciras
LLeida
Madrid
Huesca
Barcelona
Sevilla Córdoba
Zaragoza
PamplonaLogroño
Bilbao
Irún
S.Sebastián
Camp Tarragona
Antequera Granada
Valladolid
Santiago de C.
Segovia
Ourense
A Coruña
Pontevedra
Oviedo
León
Santander
Murcia
Cartagena
Alicante
Valencia
Vitoria
Albacete
Zamora
Vigo
CastellónToledo
Ciudad Real
Palencia
Lleida-Tarragona-BarcelonaETCS L1&L2 THALES
L1 Operation: - Lleida-Tarragona: Dec. 06- Tarragona-Barcelona: Feb. 08
Zaragoza-HuescaETCS L1 Alstom
Madrid-Segovia-ValladolidETCS L1&L2 THALESL1 Operation: Dec. 07
Commuters Service MadridETCS L2 THALES
La Sagra-ToledoETCS L1 THALES
LZB THALESLZB Operation: Nov. 05
Madrid-Zaragoza-LleidaETCS L1&L2 AnsaldoL1 Operation: May 06
Albacete-La EncinaETCS L1 Bombardier
Córdoba-MálagaETCS L1&L2 INVENSYS
LZB THALESLZB Operation: Dec. 07
717 – 19 March 2008
2. ETCS DEPLOYMENT IN SPAIN. Rolling Stock
Additionally: 2 loc. class 252 (Invensys-Dimetronic) and 217 commuter trains (Alstom and Invensys-Dimetronic)
817 – 19 March 2008
3. ETCS ONBOARD EQUIPMENT. Some important issues
Braking curves: Safety relies on the appropriate selection of braking curvesETCS on-board equipment calculates braking curves based on:
Traction/braking modelTrackside information
It is necessary to evaluate Safety Margin, taking into account:Train braking capacity and braking curves designTrackside design
Odometry: SIL4 demands high accuracy requirements for odometryCurrent odometry solutions are based on wheel sensors and Doppler radarsTo fulfil safety requirements it is necessary to pay attention to:
Architecture: component layout, algorithms, redundancyRadar performance under bad conditions: ice, snow, etc
EMCElectromagnetic compatibility problems may appear, especially for existing trains
917 – 19 March 2008
3. ETCS ONBOARD EQUIPMENT. Train interface
ETCS-Train interfaceSeveral operational functions depends on vehicle topologyEVC-TCN interface implementation allows:
Automatic Train Operation (ATO)Redundant DMI
TCN (Train Communication Network: MVB/WTB)
ETCS Safety functions
Interface EVC/TCN
AntennasEVC
Odometry
Profibus
Display DMI
Signalling information
ATO Display DMI
Telegrams
Traction and brake
Vehicle information and
Signalling information in case of ETCS
DMI failure
Brake equipment
Boulean signal (1/0)
Emergency brake
1017 – 19 March 2008
3. ETCS ONBOARD EQUIPMENT. Specifications evolution
ETCS developmentETCS implementation in Spain started in a non stable specifications scenario The specifications were updated during the ETCS development Additional effort required:
Harmonization process involving all suppliersDrivers trainingMigration to new versions (2.0.0 2.2.2 2.3.0 ........)
Operational Harmonization still needed. Some examplesDMI:
Safety information is harmonizedDifferences in operational information (messages, planning areas, etc)
Data entry Different procedures: enter “values” or select “data set”System should avoid human error (minimize driver’s responsibility): Checking data entered versus real train brake state
1117 – 19 March 2008
3. ETCS ONBOARD EQUIPMENT. Beyond the specifications
Additional functionalities
Increasing reliability and performance is possible beyond the specifications
Some examples of solutions adopted in Spanish projects:
Redundant DMI: Operation is still possible in case of DMI failureL0 + ASFA: Dynamic transitions to other signalling systems through National
FunctionsJRU: Compatible data analysis tool
1217 – 19 March 2008
3. ETCS ONBOARD EQUIPMENT. Beyond the specifications
Redundant DMI
HST class 102/103: Diagnosis DMI used as ETCS DMIHST class 120: GSM-R DMI shared with ETCS in case of failure
ETCS
GSM-R
1317 – 19 March 2008
3. ETCS ONBOARD EQUIPMENT. Beyond the specifications
National Function “ASFA Management” (Level 0 + ASFA):
ETCS manages ASFA activation allowing dynamic transitions to ASFA lines without STM:
• Level 0: ETCS in service (all ETCS L0 functions active) + ASFA in service • Level 1/2: ETCS in service + ASFA in stand by• Transitions L0 + ASFA L1/L2: UNISIG compliant
ETCSASFA
1417 – 19 March 2008
3. ETCS ONBOARD EQUIPMENT. Beyond the specifications
JRU: Interoperable Data analyser developed by CEDEX
Initial specifications can lead to incompatible analysis tools Specific programs were required for each ETCS solutionCEDEX developed a compatible tool. Vital to field test analysis
CEDEX analyser
Specific tools
Select format: decodes data from different applications
1517 – 19 March 2008
4. HOMOLOGATION AND VALIDATION PROCESS
Homologation scene
Initial situation: No certification was possible due to unstable specifications
It was necessary to develop a specific validation procedure:
In accordance to EN 50126/ EN 50129
Parallel to certification process
1617 – 19 March 2008
5. COMMERCIAL EXPERIENCE WITH ETCS AND STM
Current situation: 25.000 km/day under ETCS L113.300 km/day under STM-LZBPunctuality (5’ delay): 98,82 % (all incidents considered, not only ETCS)
Málaga
LLeida
Madrid
Huesca
Barcelona
Sevilla
Córdoba
Zaragoza
PamplonaLogroño
Irún
S.Sebastián
Camp Tarragona
Antequera
Valladolid
Segovia
Madrid-Barcelona (625 km) ETCS L132 daily trips HST class 103 (300 km/h)
Madrid-Zaragoza (307 km) ETCS L112 daily trips HST class 102 (300 km/h)
Madrid-Málaga (512 km) STM-LZB 24 daily trips HST class 102 (300 km/h)2 daily trips HST class 103 (300 km/h)
Madrid-Sevilla (471 km) STM-LZB 2 daily trips HST class 103 (300 km/h)
Madrid-Valladolid (179 km) ETCS L1 10 daily trips HST 102 class (300 km/h)
Madrid-Pamplona/Logroño/IrúnETCS L1 (277 km) and Level 0+ASFA
10 daily trips HST class 120 (250 km/h)
1717 – 19 March 2008
6. CONCLUSIONS
ETCS in Spain now:Spain has the largest high-speed network in commercial operation with ETCS L1
Spanish Railway Administration is developing a huge programme for new lines and
vehicles
Very high quality of service requirements are fulfilled
ETCS L2 validation is under process
Experience to share:Cross compatibility among equipments from different suppliers
Technical and operational compatibility with existing NON ETCS lines, through STMs or
National Functions
ETCS implementation process management
Real interoperability is a fact