Allelic diversity of domestication genes associated with anthocyanincontent and profile in wild grapevine (Vitis vinifera ssp sylvestris)
Rosa Arroyo-García
The grapevine, Vitis vinifera, ssp. sativa was likely domesticated from V. vinifera ssp. sylvestris The sylvestris subpecies has an Euroasiatic distribution The domestication process likely involved:
Selection of female and hermaphrodite plants Selection of plants producing larger, sweeter and colorful fruit Establishment of cutting propagation
Zohary, 1995
Grapevine domestication
Phenotypic variation between wild and cultivated grapevine
Morphological differences• Leaf morphology • Flower type • Fruit size • Seed size
wildcultivated
Leaves
Fruit
Seeds
Differences at biotic and abiotic stresses
Flowers
Habitats of wild grape populations in the Iberian Peninsula
•Sandly soils
•River forest
• River banks
• Coastal sheers and beaches
S1 S2 S3S4
S5S6
S7
S8S9
S10S11
S12
S13
237 samples
61 locations
13 river bank populations
PopulationsGuadiana S8Guadalhorce S12Guadalete S11Guadalquivir S9Palmones S13Marisma S10Ebro S1Deva S2Playa S3Cadagua S4Nervion S5Cares S6Ason S7
V. vinifera ssp sylvestris in the Iberian Peninsula
Are they a mixture of wild forms, cultivated forms and rootstocks?
Genetic and Morphological Characterization
1010Putative hybridsPutative hybrids
Paretage analyses with cultivated grapevine and rootstocks
219 genotypes
Genetic Characterization
Morphological Characterization
192 genotypes219 genotypes
Mol Ecol (2012). 21(4)800-16
Population Structure in wild grapevine
Two major genetic groups of wild grapevine: Northern and Southern
Two major genetic groups of wild grapevine: Northern and Southern
Morphological characterization
34 Phenotypic traits evaluated in 192 accessions
21 OIV traits evaluated 3 consecutive years: 051, 053, 067, 068, 070, 81-1, 81-2, 082, 83-1, 83-2, 202, 203, 206, 208, 220, 223, 225, 230, 236, 241, 503
9 Agronomic valuesProduction per plants (grape weight) Sugar contentTotal acidityAlcohol probable degreeCluster weightBerries per cluster (3 clusters)Must yield (%)Berry weightFlower sex
2 Phenological traitsBud breaking timeVeraison time
2 Enological traitscontent and profile of anthocyanins
IMIDRA, El EncínMadrid
Trait: Berry Color
The grape ancestor has black skinned berries.
Berry color in cultivated grapevines display wide range of variation
The color of berry skin is determinated by the quantive and composition of anthocyanins.
Anthocyanin content/ profile in wild vines has not been reported.
The grape ancestor has black skinned berries.
Berry color in cultivated grapevines display wide range of variation
The color of berry skin is determinated by the quantive and composition of anthocyanins.
Anthocyanin content/ profile in wild vines has not been reported.
V. vinifera ssp sylvestris126 distinct female genotypes
Total Anthocyanin mg/kg grapes
Wild accessions 400-3795 Cultivated García-Beneytez (2003) 204-2068
Cultivated García-Rodríguez (2006) 431-1513
Levels of anthocyanins are slighly high but similar to those presented by winemaking grapes.
Trait:Anthocyanin content
The distribution of the anthocyanin content is different betwen Northen and Southern
populations.
Anthocyanin Biosynthesis
One locus constituted for a cluster of MYB-type transcriptional factor genes
VvMybA1 and VvMybA2 were shown to be functionallyinvolved in berry pigmentation.
Candidate Genes
Fournier-Level et al., 2009
White allele
Red allele
Allelic diversity in VvMybA1
Gret1
a d3
VvmybA1
TS
VvmybA13´LTR5´LTR gag-pol
VvmybA1a
F1 R2
VvmybA1
TS
VvmybA1
VvmybA1c
VvmybA1
TS
VvmybA1E1 E2 E3P
White alelle
Wild type alelle
192 distint female genotypes from Spain
Structure of theVvmybA1 alelles
New allele with insertion in the promotor region of VvmybA1
Genotypes
The most frequent genotype are homozygous for the wild type alelle VvmybA1c
Alleles A B C D E F G HVvmybA1+44+111 + + +VvmybA1+111 +VvmybA1+44 + + +VvmybA1c + + +VvmybA1a + + +
% of Population 69,96 0,45 0,45 0,45 3,59 24,22 0,45 0,45
Allelic frequencies of VvmybA1
The new allele VvmybA1 +111 is not present in the cultivated grapevine
Relationship between genotypes and anthocyanin content at VvmybA1
Homozygous for the red wild alelle showed higher anthocyanin content than
heterozygous
G
VvmybA1 VvmybA2
G
Accession T7b/d3 a/d3Anthocyanin concentration (mg/grape kg )
BU 1.1' + + 460CA 9.7 + + 504CO 7.7 + + 558CO 6.8 + + 680CA 12.3 + + 830BI 1.3' + + 956CO 4.7 + + 982CO 1.5 + + 999J 2.4 + + 1007
Relationship between genotypes and anthocyanin content at VvmybA2
G
Gret 1
VvmybA1 VvmybA2
Genotype
?
Accesions with low anthocyanin concentration
156 163 223 277 295 305 312 378 382 391 418 425Bu 1.1 C A T G A A T T G A A ABu 1.1 T G T G A A T G A A G ACa 9.7 C G G A A A T G A A G ACa 9.7 T G T G A A T G A A G A
Ca 12.3 C A T G A A T T G A A ACa 12.3 C G T G A A T G A A G ABi 1.3 C G T A G G T G A G G ABi 1.3 C G T A A G T G A G G GWhite C G T A A G T T A G G G
Red C G T A A G T G A G G G
Change Cis by Gly
Relationship between genotypes and anthocyanin content at VvmybA2
New allele with a change of Cys by Gly in the coding region of VvmybA2
Step 1: Primer design
Step 2: Primer extension
Step 3: Detection
SNaPShot (Applied Biosystems)
• 32 cv: T (66%)• 16 cv: T/G (34%)
• 32 syl: T (80%)• 8 syl: T/G (20%)
G
SNaPShot (Applied Biosystems)
Allelic diversity of VvmybA2
Georgian samples
• 16cv: T (80%)• 4cv:T/G (20%)
• 171 syl: T (95%)• 9 syl: T/G (5%)
Spanish samples
Levels of anthocyanins in wild accessions are quite variable, but similar to those presented by winemaking grapes.
We have found a new alelles in VvmybA1 and VvmybA2 TF genes.
The alellic diversity in natural populations is higher in the center of diversity of the specie.
The anthocyanin content could be affected by additive or synergistic effects of these alelles.
Conclusions
Trait: Anthocyanin Profile
Castellani et al., 2007
Cyanidin
CyGl
PnGl
Delphinidin
DpGl
PtGl
MvGl
Glycosylation
Methylation of the OH groups in the
B-ring.
Acilation of the glucose
Acylated derivaded
Trait:Anthocyanin Profile
Trisubstituted Disubstituted
Glucose Glucose Glucose
Glucose Glucose
Cyanidin Peonidin Delphinidin
Petunidin Malvidin
Malvidin-acetil-glucoside
Malvidin-p-cumaril-glucoside
-Group A: without acylated anthocyanins
-Group B: anthocyanin monoglucosides type cianidin with acylated derivated
-Group C: anthocyanin monoglucosides type delphinin with acylated derivated (p-coumaraylated).
- Group D: anthocyanin monoglucosides type delphinin with acylated derivated (acetic acid)
Phenotype Characterization
126 distinct female genotypes
Revilla et al., 2010
Distribution of Anthocyanin profile correspond with geographic distribution
Phenotype Characterization
Acylated anthocyanin
Methylated anthocyanin
Family Anthocyanins South North% No Methylated DpGl 1,9-35,2 9,8-44,9
CyGl 0,3-38,2 1,5-42,3% Methyltated PtGl 2,2-21,1 8,8-21,7
PnGl 2,5-62,2 3,6-35,8MvGl 6,42-68,3 5,3-58,9
Family South North Total
Without acylated 4 19 23
with acylated 63 40 103
Candidate Gen: Vv 3´5´O- methyl-transferase 3.2Candidate Gen: Vv 3´5´O- methyl-transferase 3.2
Candidate genes: Methylation level of anthocyanin
- Gene expression in different berryenviromental stages
- Sequence gene candidate
Founier-Level , 2012
Candidate Gene: Expression of VvOMT3.2
Expression OMT 3.2Anthocyanin concentration
Percentage
% No Methylated anthocyanin
Percentage
% Methylated anthocyanin
% Methylated anthocyanin
% No Methylated anthocyanin
10 20 30 40 50 60....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|.
SS3.5_Alelo1 MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYILETSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIMSS3.5_Alelo2 MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYLLETSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIMSS65 MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYILETSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIMCO5.5 MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYLLETSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIMCR1.5 MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYLLETSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIMBrancellao MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYLLDTSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIMSANGUIVESE_Alelo1 MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYLLETSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIMSANGUIVESE_alelo2 MSSSSHRGILKTEALTKYLLETSAYPREHEQLKGLREATVEKHKYWSLMNVPVDEGLFISMLLKIM
100 110 120 130 140 150....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|.
SS3.5_Alelo1 QDGKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMSVLNDLIADGKEEGTLDFAMVDADKENSS3.5_Alelo2 QDGKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMSVLNDLIADGKEEGTLDFAMVDADKENSS65 QDGKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMSVLNDLIADGKEEGTLDFAMVDADKENCO5.5 QDGKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMSVLNDLIADGKEEGTLDFAMVDADKENCR1.5 QDGKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMSVLNDLIADGKEEGTLDFAMVDADKENBrancellao QDGKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMTVLNDLIADGKEEGTLDFAMVDADKENSANGUIVESE_Alelo1 QDGKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMSVLNDLIADGKEEGTLDFAMVDADKENSANGUIVESE_alelo2 QDSKIIAVDPDKEAYQTGVPFIKKAGVEHKINFIQSDAMSVLNDLIADVSVLSVARATAAFNQTPL
190 200 210 220 230....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|.
SS3.5_Alelo1 WFGSVARSEEEEMMDFERAGRVHLMKLNKFLASDPRVELSHLSIGDGVALCRRLY*SS3.5_Alelo2 WFGSVARSEEEEMMDFERAGRVHLMKLNKFLASDPRVELSHLSIGDGVALCRRLY*SS65 WFGSVARSEEEEMMDFERAGRVHLMKLNKFLASDPRVELSHLSIGDGVALCRRLY*CO5.5 WFGSVARSEEEEMMDFERAGRVHLMKLNKFLASDPRVELSHLSIGDGVALCRRLY*CR1.5 WFGSVARSEEEEMMDFERAGRVHLMKLNKFLASDPRVELSHLSIGDGVALCRRLY*Brancellao WFGSVARSEEEEMMDFERAGRVHLMKLNKFLASDPRVELSHLSIGDGVALCRRLY*SANGUIVESE_Alelo1 WSGSVARSEEEEMMDFERAGRVHLMKLNKFLASDPRVELSHLSIGDGVALCRRLY*SANGUIVESE_alelo2 --------------------------------------------------------
Candidate Gene: Sequence of OMT3.2
wild accessions N SNP Haplotypes Hd Pi valueshigh methylation 6 23 6 1 0,01low methylation 6 13 4 0,867 0,0072
The major components of the anthocyanin profile are anthocyaninmonoglucosides type delphinin and there are varaibles quantities of acylated anthocyanins.
In some accession anthocyanin monoglucosides type cianidin are predominate.
We have found accesions without acylated anthocyanins.
The two genetic groups (Northern-Southern) presented different characteristics related to their anthocyanin profile.
VvAOMT3.2 expression profile correlated with the level of methylated anthocyanin.
We have not found a novel VvAOMT variants associated with methylation level.
Conclusions
Alejandro Benito y Félix Cabello, IMIDRA Madrid, Spain
Ali Ergul, Ankara University, Turkey
Eugenio Revilla Autonoma University, Madrid, Spain
David CarrascoAlba Mª Vargas
INIA-CBGP
RTA2008-00036-01
Gabriella de Lorenzis; Osvaldo Failla Millan University, Italy
David Maghez, Georgia
COST-Action FA1003