+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

Date post: 10-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: cyberspaced-educator
View: 506 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
11
SASTA Psychology Summer Conference What’s wrong with marks? January 2010
Transcript
Page 1: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

SASTA Psychology Summer Conference

What’s wrong with marks?

January 2010

Page 2: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

2

Historical Data

Year Enrolment Mean %

2004 597 61.3

2005 1242 59.6

2006 1740 59.2

2007 1996 55.5

2008 2096 58.4

2009 2851 51.2

Page 3: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

3

Examination Specifications

Learning Outcomes 1, 4, 5, and 61 knowledge and understanding4 informed decision making5 application of knowledge6 analysis of behaviour

Rules of thumb 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 mean 60%

Page 4: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

4

Specifications

Criteria for judging performance knowledge (40) analysis (25) application (25) evaluation (20) communication (10)Total 120

Page 5: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

5

TOPIC

Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6Ethics

Levels

knowledge

analysis

application

evaluation

communication

Total 120

Page 6: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

6

Chemistry External Examination

Acq

uir

ing

kn

ow

led

ge

Un

de

rsta

nd

ing

an

d p

rob

lem

so

lvin

g

Usin

g k

now

led

ge

Co

mm

un

ica

tin

g

kn

ow

led

ge

Ap

pro

xim

ate

M

ark

s

Skills 20

Elemental and Environmental Chemistry

30

Analytical Techniques 30

Using and Controlling Reactions

60

Organic and Biological Chemistry

40

Materials 20

TOTAL 20 120 20 40 200

Page 7: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

7

Moderation Impact

YEARPractical & Social

Relevance Course Work Exam

2000 84 84 68 59 59

2001 83 83 67 65 65

2002 83 82 65 63 63

2003 83 82 65 56 56

2004 82 82 64 58 58

2005 82 82 64 57 57

2006 80 79 65 62 62

…generate this!

After moderation After stat. mod

Page 8: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

8

Statistical Moderation Effects

Page 9: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

9

New SACE ‘Success for All’

Research about retention Capabilities ‘Letting students into the secret’

Professor Royce Sadler (Griffith University) ‘assessment based on criteria and standards’ ‘In Queensland we have embraced the ideas and

principles of assessing students against defined standards. We are used to words like criteria and standards.’

Page 10: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

10

Royce Sadler By criteria is meant properties,

characteristics and qualities. Standards on the other hand are

definite levels or degrees of something. Standards and criteria are different. It is possible to make a judgment about

standards without using criteria but not to justify the standard without the criteria.

Page 11: Rothenberg Whats Wrong With Marks

11

Consequences

Criteria and standards system then Standards are absolute and are not

norm-referenced Disclosure for students and teachers System promotes self monitoring and

hence motivation (learning to learn, formative work, and assessment for learning)


Recommended