52BieSE0068 2.11586 BURCHELL LAKE 010
REPORT OP WORK VLF-EM SURVEYS
SHEBANDOWAN LAKE PROPERTY
for
GREY OWL RESOURCES LTD.
T. Sanders Geologist Thunder Bay Ont August 1988
RECEIVODSUP Y 1988
MINING LANDS SECTION
1 .0 SUMMARY
A VLF survey was carried out on four claims located in the Burchell lake area of northwestern Ontario. This work outlined three electromagnetic anomalies. Follow-up exploration is warranted to better detail the indicated EM expressions.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
During the period of June 19 to 24 1988,linecutting and a VLF-EM survey were carried out on a four claim portion of Grey Owl Resources' Shebandowan Lake Property, located in the Burchell Lake area of northwestern Ontario.
The VLP survey was undertaken to locate zones of sulphide mineralization and suitable structural features which would serve as a guide to evaluating the claims' potential for gold mineralization.
3.0 DESCRIPTION,LOCATION and ACCESS
The claims are situated just south of the southern-most part of of Upper Shebandown Lake ,and are located approximately 120 kilometers west of Thunder Bay (Figures:1 and 2)
Access to the property is facilitated by highways 11/17 and 11 west from Thunder Bay to Kashabowie. At Kashabowie a series of gravel roads lead west arid then south to the claims.
Figure'1 Property Locotion Mop
PROPERTY LOCATION
- H i-UOJIJ.'BOOI jCq.uedoad peiT'8^eCI 'Z
The group consists of four unpatented raining claims which are held by R. Goodchild (per Grey Owl Resources).
4.0 EXPLORATION HISTORY
Details concerning previous exploration have been compiled from available assessment files (Resident Geologist's Piles,Thunder Bay),and from relevant government geological publications.
In 1955-56 exploration and staking activity in the area increased as a result of the development of the Coldstreara Copper Mine.
In 1956 Jellicoe Mines held the property and carried out VLEM surveying,geological mapping and prospecting on the claims.
5.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The consolidated lithologies of the region are of Precambrian age (Archean) and form part of the Shebandowan-Wawa Subprovince (Superior Structural Province).
In particular the Burchell Lake area is underlain by a northeasterly-trending,linear,raetavolcanic belt,which is flanked to the north by fault-bounded raetasedirnents (Quetico Subprovince ?) and to the south by syenite and granitic batholiths. The metavolcanic belt is characterized by an inner felsic core and outlying outer mafic margins
indicating a possible anticlinal structure.
Metasediments and raetavolcanics have been intruded by small,felsic to ultramafic,sills and stocks.
Faulting is generally in NE or NW directions.Metamorphism is o f greenschist to lower amphibolite
grade.
6.0 PROPERTY SKOLOflY
Previous geological work indicates that the property is underalain by a NE-trending sequence of mafic metavolcanics.
7.0 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY
7.1 Linecutting
The survey is tied to a cut and chained grid with an east-west base line with perpendicular wing-lines at 400 foot intervals.
7.2 VLP Survey
The survey utilized an Phoenix VLP-2 receiver which was tuned to the Cutler,Maine transmitter,which broadcasts at a frequency of 24.0 kHz. Readings of in-phase and horizontal fied strength were normally taken at 100 foot spaoings.
8.0 RESULTS and IN'J'tiHPRSTATIONS
Survey results are presented in plan form (Map 1) at a scale of 1 inch to 200 feet { Map 1)
The survey was successful in outlining three anomalous EM features.
Anomaly A consists of a moderate in-phase response with a corresponding horizontal field strength peak. Data indicates a bedrock conductor, and although this is most evident on line 8E the anomaly is possiblu screened by conductive sediments to the north and may extend NNE under Lake Shebandowan.
Anomaly B is marked by a series of moderate to strong assymetric in-phase and moderate to strong field strength responses. Since the EM axis trends easterly,while lithologies trend NE,and corresponds to an area of low swampy ground the anomaly is probably related to conductive sediments.
Anomaly C consists of a several weak,incomplete in-phase and poor field strength responses. These expression may indicate a bedrock feature that is partially screened by weakly conductive sediments to the north.
9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Since the VLF-EM survey was successful in locating three EM anomalies futher work is warranted. A program consisting of geological mapping and a magnetic survey would better define the significance of the outlined EM features.
Todd Sanders BSc.
Geologist Thunder Bay,0nt, August 1988
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmer 52B]9SEM6B 2 .11 see''BURCHELL'LAKE'
and Mines900
Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines
September 28, 1988 Your File: Our File :
W8804-362 2.11586
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and Mines435 James Street SouthP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6
Dear Madam:
RE: Notice of Intent dated September 13, 19*
ONTARIO OBOUOOICAL SURVEYASSESSMENT FILES
OFFICE
OCT 18 1988
RECEIVEDGeophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted on Mining Claims TB 990025 et al in the Burchell Lake Area.
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
W. R. Cowan, Manager Mining Lands Section Mines S Minerals Division
Whitney Block, Room 6610Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Telephone: (416) 965-4888
RM:sc
cc: Mr. Roy Goodchild Pic Reserve Heron Bay, Ontario POT 1RO
cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining s Lands Conroissioner Toronto, Ontario
cc: Mr. T. Sanders 149 Duke Street Thunder Bay, Ontario P7A 5S9
cc: Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario
Ministry oljhern Development
Ontario
Technical Assessment Work Credits
Date
September 13,1988
File
2.11586Mining Recorder'* Report of Work No.W8804-362
Recorded Holder
Mr. Roy GoodchildTownship or Area
Burchell Lake
Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim
Geophysical
Electromagnetic 4U days
Magnetometer rtays
Radiometrir rtays
Other rlays
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
Geological Hays
Geochemical Hays
Man days | | Airborne | |
Special provision Q3 Ground [X]
l l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
TB 990027 to 028
Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims
20 Days Electromagnetic 10 Days Electromagnetic
TB 990025 TB 990026
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
l | not sufficiently covered by the survey | | insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19)-60.
Ministry ofhern Development
y fOntario
Report of Work
(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditure?
DOCUMENT
\N8804-
Mining Act
ructioruj: Please type or print.If number of mining claifts traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list.
Note: Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Oo not use shaded areas below.
Type o* S urvey(s)
Claim Holoer(s)
AaO'ess
/s. A?Township or Area
[Pros pec tor's Licence No.
_l!inSiSSSurvey Cornpany
t r'c-1~[bete of Survey (from
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Tecrinical report)
x*/:? 'J/--
Total Miles of line Cut
3 r-
?S/? S 5 cjCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
CompleDreCr/Tsip l W BndentlnoTllRfhlTe 1 V
JUL 1 2 n
MINING LAND? S!
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
m ^Electromagnetic
.- - Magnetometer O
- Radiometric
- ri Other P i.^fl
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days per Claim
vo
Days per Claim
Days perClaim
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
S Hr 15
Total Day* Credits
s
Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim (elected in columns at right.
Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts tet forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Penon Certifying
l D*t* CertifiedA-
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
'Ontario
Geophysical-Geologlcal-Geochemlcal Technical Data Statement
File
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s) — Township or Area — Claim Holder(s)__^i
OH*,
Survey Company Author of ReportAddress of Author
Covering Dates of Survey.
Total Miles of Line Cut—
OMUL /1 A)/ (linecutting to office)
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer™.—Radiometric——
—Other.———^—
DAYS per claim
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit! do not apply to airborne lurveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric
DATE:.
(enter days per claim)
SIGNATURE:.eport or Agent
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
f f'(prefix)' (miner)
18
l
TOTAL CLAIMS.
837 (B5/12)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA\ V,
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations —
Station interval -——— Profile scale ~~Z2//) 4s)e-StT
Contour interval.
Instrument.Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.
.Number of ReadingsJLine sparing
Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ___
Instrument
ECTROMAGNETK Tnil rnnfigiiratinn
riml separation
Accuracy 7̂ ' A far tt s - / c ttafi fie/if sA+mf/* ^ SsZMethod: O Fixed transmitter O Shoot back D In line Freciuencv. -*V-e x-Afc Zut/ts flu/H*.
O Parallel line
Parameters measured /'t
Instrument.
Scale constantCorrections made.
O Base station value and location,
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument -———————— Method D Time Domain
Parameters — On time ——. - Off time ——.
Q Frequency Domain
_ Frequency _____
_ Range ^——^^^.
— Integration time.
Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing .
Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIALInstrument———————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method ————-——-—^^——^-—————-———--—-——-——-——————
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC Instrument ————Values measured.Energy windows (levels)——-—-——-—.————-——-——-——————.—————————
Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector————————.^.—^^—.^-—..—-—.——..————-^—.-...^...—^.Overburden -^^—^^^^^-—-—^———————————.———.————.---...—-—.
(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey——————————————————————Instrument .—^—^——————————^^——-——Accuracy——————————————————————————Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s)——^ Instrument(s) —————
(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy——^——^————^————-
(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used.-————-———————————^™.^——^^—..-M.Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection———————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————
Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent
p. p. m. p. p. b.
D D D
Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)
Others.________________________Field Analysis (.
Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ——~——————
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————
Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used ——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method— Analytical Method—— Reagents Used————
.tests)
.tests)
.tests)
General. General.
Tilly
La
ke
Area
.-...—
-.-p.-,
i — t
,.^. .M
™. ,
CI
xj
Lake
Ar
ea (
G--
724)
00 m (p CD
M
3J Z
2
CD
W ~
w f 2
.o
SE
wc
53 5
S ~
^(D
O
(0
l
H l
H
*~
S x
g x
5C
! H
Co
C
'
Z ?
Z
o
Z
oo
a o
5 a
lm
** m
M rn
530
S
33 5
30
3CD
S
CD
CD DO O Z mM̂ O
7s m
H
Xr-
m n i n o z
ls\
in
fc 3 *
-rf*
t-t-ooi
1 -W'\ f\
v 1w \l\
A *\^ K
yX
X^
y
.-'"" -8 ~ ~"~ ^ - , *l^ -^-"""
•*- 11 T r' V-
p- V/1 -H -I-H vr V
+H fii-n r ii
* 'V1 -!(tt i
i-i i/ it i t-t, .f i i1 - — i ' l~] o \
^7\to ' , * -Vi1*
/\X \
/ \no *s -HO j
1'i 0 ^ H x-, r \ * J i\ V\ AV -M. ^ /.
1X1*0 :ISO ________________ frlV ^ ——
\\ , fce \1i no *4 j.
.^ 0 A/'j iso -t-T
\
'•Vo t i ;rl
! i
1
\}0 0t
4.1 "'IH" ^o 0 o ;.
.5-0 -4 '.
. llO -M
1 ;It" ^M .
iS"0 -4
iUo -c
V '
N1.00 t H j "v J.e,^8 7'i^ y
X-fcO tH, T '. f\ 'i 1
no nl ' MJ'j
I4t( -fVI, 1
iUO ^ ^1 1
1vi 0 o i
•z* -^ '-1.\.
lid -l* .-'.-'-M
^i xo *x -*-6 x* "
^-r It t *\
loo "t- It j X
i i-rt .\ \
- Ho -rg *
' \\o -**-l j
j' VtO *2- *,!
*
- uo -i ;\ j. **w -7.;
' li O ^ '
(fo M-* i\
\
me *"i --
110 *-^ : 'li
^ lv
1 l" "T
1 ~*
-1" ______ |' ———— -^
1 '1
i i i C
V
1^-10 - -v-2-
1 \.
/* sl D P -t'i*'X ^ --"
.-0.00 f' - lo
' /- 6 . ^410-3 \ * ^\ y^
l^)C ^^^ *\0 ,*^"Xi'i 'a " t'.' ^* ^ O
•Ni 'i '; ** -^ r
1 1 f 1' 1
o;,' Xi n *- /'\ ,.. r A ' -"i \ '.
5' \loc. ^ Ol -' 1
V \
\ fO t t ' t; ' \\:i ^•, ifo o j
1-, TO r' jii ,... - ,.1 "~ i
1 -~\o '
\ '.C ~\T-
•^tO ^ \ (e
\ \ ~-' - 1*
; V 0 ~ ^,' - if N; -!,T-
^ --M, '\ 2 } ^IUO ^ ,. ^ .,---'-2.H
xx ,/ ~ 'lw.* * . , ' - \oX '.^io ' ^ : -sk* - i y - ^
7.&C -', V\Z7*** -^ *
vH 1' -*-^ " '- \\ '
IOD Tl4 - - . ',
^ -C -w^ '^ o - ,•HO **S ^^.
/.' "/!o'0 -r* - -
1
l* i;** 'v
\' no +1 '
i |
l !P 1^0*^1
f
; tt
i' l*l i v
' *o V t
1 \1* i lot
^ * l*"
\\ CD
;\, *. \,.t -- " 'N•' •*- ; ^
"" 7 " ti " '^-. IH o y
X ^.^u ;, a;- v-" bu
IS" ^0**"V li?
loo
110
i1 l O
li 0
lit)
i-tvS-*
+ U '\To
*4
-H
^o
III' •f l
l to
tT.0
52B10SE0068 2.11586 BURCHELL LAKE 210
-^
-U
/s\
-zi
-10
7
30O
1.10
field
—t
-So
. 11586
Out.
i/J-f ~
i*
-T-S-
\" * Zoo*
