+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE

ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE

Date post: 03-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: trinhnhu
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
573 food poisoning.-Dr. F. PARKES WEBER did not agree there was an absence of literature dealing with the clinical symptoms of coronary obstruction ; it was to be found under two headings : angina pectoris and status anginosus. The older contributions supplied the main basis for the coronary theory of the causation of angina pectoris.-Sir WILLIAM WILLCOX spoke of two cases of the condition he had seen, in one of which a toxin-that of trench fever-seemed to have played a part. The PRESIDENT described a case in which abdominal pain was prominent. Even in very large doses morphia had no effect on it. ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE. SECTION OF ANÆSTHETICS. AT a meeting of this Section on March 7th a paper on SPINAL ANALGESIA WITH SPINOCAIN was read by Mr. CHARLES DONALD. He recalled that spinocain was devised by Pitkin, of New Jersey, to overcome some of the difficulties encountered with the analgesics usually injected into the spinal canal. Pitkin, he said, claims for its absolute controllability over height, absolute maintenance of blood pressure, an almost absolute freedom from complications, and satisfactory analgesia in operations below the diaphragm. To this end he employs novocain as the least toxic analgesic, mixed with alcohol to make it a " light " solution, a viscous derivative of starch to limit absorption and diffusibility, and strychnine to act on the vaso-constrictors in the anterior roots. A separate administration of novocain and ephedrine is previously made into the track of the spinal needle, their respective effect being to prevent pain on passing the larger needle and to raise the blood pressure. The solution, said Mr. Donald, has been given in 150 cases at the London Hospital and a smaller series, using crystalline neocaine and novocain, has also been done. As regards control over the height of analgesia, the technique of dosage, expansion of the indiffusible medium before injection, and the assumption of the Trendelenburg position, Pitkin’s recommendations have been followed and various modifications have been tried to test the claims. The statement that absorption is relatively slow appears to be correct, for the equivalent amount of pure novocain gave, as a rule, greater analgesia. The use of the Trendelenburg position seemed only to cause a slight delay in the analgesia reaching the average height it attained if injected into a patient in the horizontal position. The same can be said of the indiffusibility. Waywardness in extent occurred as with other analgesics, and those in whom there was much over-action comprised the old, the very ill, and the flabby. Dosage and the type of patient were the only two recognisable factors. Out of 54 cases in which careful readings of blood pressure were taken, 17 had a fall of more than 20 mm. Hg. In seven the fall was 50 mm. or more. The fall was in no way proportional to the height of analgesia and therefore not to the number of anterior roots involved. In 18 of the cases analgesia reached to the second rib or higher ; in only six was there a fall of more than 20 mm. ; in several of these the pressure actually rose. Strychnine has never proved itself in these cases. Ephedrine does not prevent a fall, but as recovery is taking place there is apparently a quicker restitution to normal. The cases which showed falls in pressure were prostatectomies, gravely ill patients, cases of severe peritonitis, and a very few cases of simple operations. In the last the fall might be attributable to psychological causes. There were certainly very few complications, said Mr. Donald. One moribund patient died on the table, but it is to the credit of spinocain that others in like state did not. Old, shocked, or toxic they took it well. There have been no palsies and only four severe headaches. Post-operative vomiting has been rare, much rarer than with novocain or- neocaine, but the claim of rapid emptying of the bowels and non-occurrence of ileus has not been substantiated. The dose of spinocain can be pushed to cover higher abdominal operations, but then occasionally pain is complained of, and there is retch- ing during the intra-abdominal manipulations. Failures have been met with after a long series of successes, and it is possible that the novocain may have deteriorated in solution. Spinocain has not justified its major claims as to the controllability and maintenance of blood pressure, but the results, confirm Koster and Kasman’s experimental and clinical observation that respiratory and blood pressure dangers have been overestimated-at least when neocaine and novocain are used and the Trendelenburg position is employed during the operation. Dr. W. HOWARD JONES read a paper on Percain : A New Regional and Spinal Anœsthetic. Spinal analgesia, he said, results either from simple intradural caudal block or in the dorsal region thoracic nerve root block. The nerve trunks of the cauda equina are directly accessible to a needle through any of the lumbar interspaces ; the thoracic roots are- remote from the needle point and in the past have- been reached by the following methods (1) Gravita- tional diffusion resulting from the injection of a. solution relatively heavier, than the spinal fluid- (2) Barbotage or mixing the dose in the syringe with, spinal fluid and repeated withdrawal and reinjection, of fluid, usually completed by gravitational diffusion- (3) Replacement of a large quantity of spinal fluid withdrawn into a syringe containing the dose of drug, also likely to be completed by gravitational diffusion. A New Method.-The method now advocated is that of treating the subarachnoid space in the same- manner as the tissues and injecting it under pressure- without withdrawing any cerebro-spinal fluid to the.- limit required by the operation. The volume dosage has been arrived at in the adult by injecting a series of consecutive cases with increasing quantities of solution and recording the levels reached. Egtreme- accuracy is not essential; splanchnic block requires that the solution shall pass the roots of D 5, but it must not reach the cervical roots, especially the main phrenic roots of C 4. A satisfactory level to reach i& D 2 or D 3. The adult spine varies in length; a varia- tion of about four inches has been found in the measurement between the inter-iliac line and the- seventh cervical spine, in full flexion. The volume- dosage for splanchnic block has been between 16 and 20 c.cm. of solution proportional to a relatively short or long spinal tube. Lower levels are reached by correspondingly smaller volumes of solution. A New Drug.-For the first time in the history of spinal analgesia a drug is available which is potent, in such high dilution that the amount dissolved add& next to nothing to the specific gravity of the vehicle- For thoracic nerve root blocks percain solutions of 1-2000, 1-1500, and 1-1000 are used according to the duration of analgesia required. The solvent has, been normal saline 0-9 per cent. and 0-5 per cent.. saline. The specific gravity of normal saline solutions is 1-006 in allthree strengths. That of the 0-5 per cent. saline solutions is 1-003. Cerebro-spinal Fluid.-The specific gravity of the cerebro-spinal fluid varies between 1-003 and 1.010, the more usual being probably 1005-1-008- This variability is the most important thing to recognise and remember when using the method under considera- tion. Comparing percain solutions with these fig-errel:;c it will be seen that normal saline solutions may be hyper-, iso-, or hypobaric and that they will be- frequently hypobaric. The 0.5 per cent. saline solu-- tions (spec. grav. 1-003) will almost certainly be hype- baric. If a normal saline solution should turn ou?. to be hyperbaric the danger to the patient in the .:
Transcript

573

food poisoning.-Dr. F. PARKES WEBER did not agreethere was an absence of literature dealing with theclinical symptoms of coronary obstruction ; it was tobe found under two headings : angina pectoris andstatus anginosus. The older contributions suppliedthe main basis for the coronary theory of thecausation of angina pectoris.-Sir WILLIAM WILLCOXspoke of two cases of the condition he had seen, inone of which a toxin-that of trench fever-seemedto have played a part.The PRESIDENT described a case in which abdominal

pain was prominent. Even in very large dosesmorphia had no effect on it.

ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE.

SECTION OF ANÆSTHETICS.AT a meeting of this Section on March 7th

a paper onSPINAL ANALGESIA WITH SPINOCAIN

was read by Mr. CHARLES DONALD. He recalled thatspinocain was devised by Pitkin, of New Jersey, toovercome some of the difficulties encountered withthe analgesics usually injected into the spinal canal.Pitkin, he said, claims for its absolute controllabilityover height, absolute maintenance of blood pressure,an almost absolute freedom from complications,and satisfactory analgesia in operations below thediaphragm. To this end he employs novocainas the least toxic analgesic, mixed with alcoholto make it a " light " solution, a viscous derivativeof starch to limit absorption and diffusibility, andstrychnine to act on the vaso-constrictors in theanterior roots. A separate administration of novocainand ephedrine is previously made into the track ofthe spinal needle, their respective effect being toprevent pain on passing the larger needle and to raisethe blood pressure.The solution, said Mr. Donald, has been given in

150 cases at the London Hospital and a smaller series,using crystalline neocaine and novocain, has alsobeen done. As regards control over the height ofanalgesia, the technique of dosage, expansion of theindiffusible medium before injection, and theassumption of the Trendelenburg position, Pitkin’srecommendations have been followed and variousmodifications have been tried to test the claims.The statement that absorption is relatively slowappears to be correct, for the equivalent amount ofpure novocain gave, as a rule, greater analgesia.The use of the Trendelenburg position seemed onlyto cause a slight delay in the analgesia reaching theaverage height it attained if injected into a patientin the horizontal position. The same can be said of theindiffusibility. Waywardness in extent occurred aswith other analgesics, and those in whom there wasmuch over-action comprised the old, the very ill, andthe flabby. Dosage and the type of patient were theonly two recognisable factors. Out of 54 cases inwhich careful readings of blood pressure were taken,17 had a fall of more than 20 mm. Hg. In seven thefall was 50 mm. or more. The fall was in no wayproportional to the height of analgesia and thereforenot to the number of anterior roots involved. In18 of the cases analgesia reached to the second ribor higher ; in only six was there a fall of more than20 mm. ; in several of these the pressure actuallyrose. Strychnine has never proved itself in thesecases. Ephedrine does not prevent a fall, but asrecovery is taking place there is apparently a quickerrestitution to normal. The cases which showed fallsin pressure were prostatectomies, gravely ill patients,cases of severe peritonitis, and a very few cases ofsimple operations. In the last the fall might beattributable to psychological causes.

There were certainly very few complications,said Mr. Donald. One moribund patient died on

the table, but it is to the credit of spinocain thatothers in like state did not. Old, shocked, or toxic

they took it well. There have been no palsies andonly four severe headaches. Post-operative vomitinghas been rare, much rarer than with novocain or-

neocaine, but the claim of rapid emptying of thebowels and non-occurrence of ileus has not beensubstantiated. The dose of spinocain can be pushedto cover higher abdominal operations, but thenoccasionally pain is complained of, and there is retch-ing during the intra-abdominal manipulations.Failures have been met with after a long series ofsuccesses, and it is possible that the novocain mayhave deteriorated in solution. Spinocain has notjustified its major claims as to the controllabilityand maintenance of blood pressure, but the results,confirm Koster and Kasman’s experimental andclinical observation that respiratory and bloodpressure dangers have been overestimated-at leastwhen neocaine and novocain are used and theTrendelenburg position is employed during theoperation.

Dr. W. HOWARD JONES read a paper onPercain : A New Regional and Spinal Anœsthetic.

Spinal analgesia, he said, results either from simpleintradural caudal block or in the dorsal region thoracicnerve root block. The nerve trunks of the caudaequina are directly accessible to a needle throughany of the lumbar interspaces ; the thoracic roots are-remote from the needle point and in the past have-been reached by the following methods (1) Gravita-tional diffusion resulting from the injection of a.

solution relatively heavier, than the spinal fluid-(2) Barbotage or mixing the dose in the syringe with,spinal fluid and repeated withdrawal and reinjection,of fluid, usually completed by gravitational diffusion-(3) Replacement of a large quantity of spinal fluidwithdrawn into a syringe containing the dose ofdrug, also likely to be completed by gravitationaldiffusion.A New Method.-The method now advocated is

that of treating the subarachnoid space in the same-manner as the tissues and injecting it under pressure-without withdrawing any cerebro-spinal fluid to the.-limit required by the operation. The volume dosagehas been arrived at in the adult by injecting a seriesof consecutive cases with increasing quantities ofsolution and recording the levels reached. Egtreme-accuracy is not essential; splanchnic block requiresthat the solution shall pass the roots of D 5, but it mustnot reach the cervical roots, especially the mainphrenic roots of C 4. A satisfactory level to reach i&D 2 or D 3. The adult spine varies in length; a varia-tion of about four inches has been found in themeasurement between the inter-iliac line and the-seventh cervical spine, in full flexion. The volume-dosage for splanchnic block has been between 16 and20 c.cm. of solution proportional to a relativelyshort or long spinal tube. Lower levels are reachedby correspondingly smaller volumes of solution.A New Drug.-For the first time in the history of

spinal analgesia a drug is available which is potent,in such high dilution that the amount dissolved add&next to nothing to the specific gravity of the vehicle-For thoracic nerve root blocks percain solutions of1-2000, 1-1500, and 1-1000 are used according tothe duration of analgesia required. The solvent has,been normal saline 0-9 per cent. and 0-5 per cent..saline. The specific gravity of normal saline solutionsis 1-006 in allthree strengths. That of the 0-5 per cent.saline solutions is 1-003.

Cerebro-spinal Fluid.-The specific gravity of thecerebro-spinal fluid varies between 1-003 and 1.010,the more usual being probably 1005-1-008- Thisvariability is the most important thing to recogniseand remember when using the method under considera-tion. Comparing percain solutions with these fig-errel:;cit will be seen that normal saline solutions may behyper-, iso-, or hypobaric and that they will be-

frequently hypobaric. The 0.5 per cent. saline solu--tions (spec. grav. 1-003) will almost certainly be hype-baric. If a normal saline solution should turn ou?.to be hyperbaric the danger to the patient in the.:

574

Trendelenburg position depends upon whether a shortor long column of solution has been created withinthe dura. Inconvenient spread may take place froma large injection even if only slightly hyperbaric.An isobaric solution will stay where it is put.

Behaviour of a Hypobaric Solution.—These solutionshave revealed for the first time the characteristicaction of a genuine " light " solution. The conditionwhich results in the dorsal decubitus is a preponderat-ing anterior root block with little or no effect on theposterior roots, thus the entire abdominal musculaturemay be paralysed, yet the patient will be in an inoper-able condition unless a general anaesthetic is given.’This effect is also recognisable when towards the end- of a long operation the patient feels pain but norigidity accompanies it, and closure of the woundin the abdomen is effected without difficulty. Anotherdemonstration is the greatly exaggerated peristalsisamounting to spasm, due to the more effectiveparalysis of the efferent inhibitory fibres of thesplanchnics contained in the anterior roots. All thisoccurs in spite of the fact that sensory fibres are more,easily affected than motor fibres. It is thus evidentthat the percain solution has applied itself in greaterconcentration to the anterior roots than to theposterior. This preponderating anterior root effectis in striking contrast to the preponderating posteriorroot effect of the small volume heavy solutions spreadby gravitational diffusion, and shows a reversal ofresults. It is therefore necessary when using hypo-baric solutions to put the patient in the ventraldecubitus after injection in order to soak the posteriorroots and develop analgesia, and when he is finallyturned on his back the anterior roots will be affectedand muscular paralysis follows. He is safe fromspread when prone, for the neck will be lower than theupper dorsal region ; but when turned on his backthe slight Trendelenburg position should be adoptedfor a time as a precaution. As it is impossible toknow beforehand the specific gravity relationshipof the normal saline solutions, it will probably bebetter practice to use in all cases the definitelyhypobaric 0-5 per cent. saline solutions (spec. grav.1-0034) in all strengths of percain, never omitting thetechnique of the grill-room chef. Strictly limitedcaudal blocks are possible with small volume hypo-baric solutions of percain, which may be used in higherconcentrations for this purpose, relying on dilutionin the cerebro-spinal fluid but even 6 c.cm. of 1-1000solution between L4 and L5 may leave the greaterpart of the lumbar plexus unaffected. These effectsof hypobaric solutions constitute a strong criticismof the pseudo-hypobaric spinocain, which althoughof low specific gravity in the ampoule, can only actin the same way as a heavy solution when mixed with,cerebro-spinal fluid, and the clinical results of whichare eloquent of gravitational diffusion-viz., pre-ponderating posterior root effect and diminishing ) concentration from below upward.

General Effects of the Injection.-There is a fall ofblood pressure due to vaso-motor paralysis. Thefall is not nearly so great as after large doses ofnovocain, and this is because the high dilution ofpercain renders sudden absorption into the bloodstream impossible. Novocain collapse is due chieflyto general poisoning by the drug following rapidabsorption from the more concentrated solutionsnecessary for effective results. The percain patient,therefore, remains in much better condition on theoperating table than those who have had novocain.Ephedrine gr. 1 to 1 may be given in all cases.

Analgesia can be obtained which outlasts the longestabdominal operation.

Respiratory Failure.-The phrenic nerve roots are-not likely to be reached directly by these volumedoses. Central failure is a possibility which mustbe watched for especially toward the end of a longoperation. The more effective paralysis of the anteriorroots of the intercostal nerves results in pure

diaphragmatic breathing, and a virtual impediment torespiration causing fatigue of the centre. Shallow

breathing, imperfect ventilation of the lung, and

anoxeemia operate as a vicious circle progressivelyincreasing central fatigue and tending to arrest.If narcotics have been given this tendency will bemuch greater. Carbon dioxide and oxygen is thecorrect treatment, and any dusky colour in thepatient is an indication for oxygen. If a combinedgeneral anaesthetic is used the closed method withoxygen is an insurance against respiratory failure.Failures with percain will be failures of technique.After-effects are the usual symptoms of

" meningism,"headache, and vomiting experienced occasionally afterother drugs and even after simple puncture.

There have been no disastrous consequences frompercain injections,said Dr. Howard Jones in conclusion,and there is little reason why there should be. Themaximum dose of 20 mg. required in the spinecompares favourably with the 100 to 200 mg. used inthe tissues, and 7-5 to 10-0 mg. are more effectivethan 150 mg. of novocain.

MEDICO-LEGAL SOCIETYAND

WEST LONDON MEDICO-CHIRURGICALSOCIETY.

AT a joint meeting of these Societies held at11, Chandos-street, on March 7th. Lord RIDDELL,President of the Medico-Legal Society. took the chair,and a discussion on

THE DOCTOR IN THE LAW COIL7RTSwas opened by Sir WiLLiAM WILLCOX. A medicalpractitioner, he said, might be called as an ordinaryor as an expert witness. Even in the former case hewas often asked to give an opinion ; he should alwaysask to be excused if he was not absolutely sure of hisground, and the judge would probably support him.In giving evidence of fact he should avoid technicalterms as far as possible, and should not makecomments. The expert’s true function was to assistthe court, and he should be absolutely free from bias ;this was supremely essential in criminal cases. Beforecoming to court he should study carefully the mostrecent literature of the subject; turn and turn overin his own mind every aspect of the matter, andcross-examine himself as severely as possible from thepoint of view of the other side. W’ritten reportsshould contain nothing that the witness might haveto repudiate afterwards. Sir William was strongly infavour of a separate preliminary conference betweenthe experts called on each side, to clear up doubtfulpoints and enable them to arrive at complete agree-ment. This was of great help to the court. Answersto cross-examination should be as concise and clear

I as possible, and the witness should avoid long explana-tions and evasion of the direct answer. Where hecould not answer yes or no, he should give his reasonsclearly and courteously. If the question were multiple,he should, if necessary, ask that the componentparts of it be put separately. When statements inbooks or reports were put to him, he should ask tosee the document before replying. An expert witnesswas usually required to attend in court during thewhole case, for it was sometimes necessary to questionhim on his opinion concerning the evidence in general.Coroners’ courts admitted much hearsay evidence.but the doctor should refrain from giving it. Onthe question of professional secrecy. Sir Williamthought that the confidences of a patient were sacred.They should only be divulged on the direct order ofa judge, and then only under strong protest. Finally,the medical witness should not try to introducepoints from his report that his counsel did not raise ;there might be a special reason for the omission.

Privilege.Lord RIDDELL said that many doctors envied the

lawyers what they believed to be their privilege. Thelawyer was not entitled to any privilege ; the privilege


Recommended