•
•
•
Rainy River Resources Ltd. orr Lake Property, Ontario
Report on July, 2006 TiU Sampling Program
RECEIV AUG 2 3 2007
by GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMEN'f David J . Hozjan and Stuart A. AveriH OFFICE
Overburden Drilling Management Limited Nepean, Ontario, Canada
January 31, 2007
., . 35683
Exploring Heavy Minerals
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
• 1. SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 3 2.1 Property Location, Access, Ownership Geology and Exploration History 3 2.2 Scope and Objectives of the Sampling Program 9 3. METHODS AND COSTS 16 3.1 Contractors 16 3.2 Field Procedures 16 3.3 Sample Processing and Gold Grain Observation Procedures 19 3.4 Analytical Procedures 24 3.5 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Measures 24 4. RESULTS 24 4.1 Overburden Conditions 24 4.2 Gold Grain Abundance 25 4.3 -0.063 mm Analyses 26 4.4 Targets Areas Identified from Gold Grains 31 4.4.1 Off Lake Area 31 4.4.2 Buckhorn Point Area 31 4.4.3 Cedar Lake Area 33 4.4.4 Pony Lake Area 33 4.4.5 Boundary Lake Area 35 4.5 Targets Areas Identified from -0.063 mm Analyses 34
• 4.5.1 Spring Lake Area 34 4.5.2 Off Lake West Area 34 4.5.3 Potts Lake Area 34 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEND A TlONS 35 6. CERTIFICATE 39 7. REFERENCES 40
FIGURES
Figure 1 Geographic location and extent of Rainy River Resourcecs' Off Lake and Richardson Township properties 4
Figure 2 Regional geological setting of the Off Lake property 5
Figure 3 Local geological setting of the Off Lake property with preliminary sample locations and mineral occurrences 6
Figure 4 Regional physiography and drift thickness map of the Rainy River area 8
Figure 5 Backscatter electron images of gold grains from till illustrating the
• relationship between grain wear and distance of transport 10
Figure 6 Expected sizes and shapes of gold dispersal trains from cross-ice (southeast trending) and ice-parallel (southwest trending) gold zones 13
•
•
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)
FIGURES (cont'd)
Figure 7 Schematic sections showing: (a) pre-meltdown generation; (b) syn-meltdown deposition; and (c) post-meltdown modification of supraglacial and subglacial till over a greenstone belt
Figure 8 Actual till sample locations with gold grain counts
Figure 9 Heavy mineral processing flowsheet for the till samples
Figure 10 Comparison of gold grain recovery from original and duplicate samples
Figure 11 Quality control comparison of -0.063 mm assay results for original and duplicate samples
Figure 12 Target follow-up areas derived from gold grain and -0.063 mm geochemical analyses
Figure 13 Proposed Phase II sample sites for the Phase I gold-in-till anomalous area along the western shore of Off Lake
TABLES
Table 1 Geochemical analyses ofNuinsco Resources Ltd. diamond drill core samples from Hole NS95-01 from the Stares Option near the northeast corner of Off
Page
14
18
22
27
30
32
36
Lake 11
Table 2 Comparison of budgeted and actual project costs 17
Table 3 Pit sample data 20
Table 4 Gold grain summary for the till samples with calculated visible gold assay values Based on assumed nonmagnetic HMC weights of 11250 of the table feed 23
Table 5 Selected analytical data for the -0.063 mm fraction 28
Table 6 Comparison of Actlab's geochemical analyses for the -0.063 mm fraction of duplicate till samples and aDM's till standard 29
•
•
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)
PLATES
Plate 1 Typical sample taken from a road cut till exposure
APPENDICES
Appendix A Pit Sample Logs
Appendix B Heavy Mineral Processing Weights and Physical Characteristics ofthe Till Samples
Appendix C Gold Grain Summary, Descriptions and Calculated Visible Gold Values for the Nonferromagnetic Heavy Mineral Fraction of the Till Ssmples
Appendix D Geochemical Analyses for the -0.063 mm Clay/Silt Fraction
Page
21
•
•
- 1 -
1. SUMMARY
This report documents a 59-sample heavy mineral geochemical pit sampling program of glacial till
for Rainy River Resources Limited in late July, 2006 on the company's Off Lake property in
northwestern Ontario near the Manitoba-Minnesota borders.
Geologically the Off Lake property is located in the northeastern part ofthe Archean-age Rainy River
Greenstone Belt and is dominated by a 4.6 km thick, southwest-trending, southeast-facing
metavolcanic assemblage, approximately 8 km in exposed width. The metavolcanics on the property
include: (1) a lowermost unit in the northwest, consisting of mafic flows intruded by numerous
quartz-feldspar porphyry dykes; (2) a second mafic unit characterized by a change from mainly
massive to mainly pillowed and porphyritic flows; and (3) an upper unit of mainly dacitic fragmental
rocks, in the southeast. Pleistocene glaciation in the Rainy River area consisted of an early advance
of the Labradorean ice sheet from the northeast followed by a later advance of Keewatin ice from
the west. Although much of the Rainy River area is covered by thick, exploration-hindering
Keewatin Till, the Off Lake property lies on high ground that impeded the Keewatin ice advance and
is therefore covered only by a thin, discontinuous layer of geochemically-responsive Labradorean
Till.
Mineral exploration in the Off Lake area dates back to the 1930s over which time three distinct styles
of mineralization were defined: (1) high-grade but very small lode gold deposits associated with
quartz-veining in the mafic volcanics; (2) low-grade eu and Zn mineralized zones hosted within
tuffaceous units; and (3) Au-rich VMS mineralization associated with felsic volcanics. Two till
samples collected by the Ontario Geological Survey over felsic volcanic rocks on the property during
a regional overburden sampling program between 1987 and 1990 yielded gold grain results
significantly above regional background levels. The grains were mainly pristine or modified
suggesting derivation from a nearby bedrock source.
Rainy River Resources' sampling extended across the property but focused primarily on testing the
felsic units, where sufficient Labradorean Till was available, to search for gold-rich VMS
mineralization. One traverse across the main mafic unit on the western part of the property tested
• for vein-type lode gold mineralization. Only high-quality, stony, subglacial, Labradorean Till was
•
•
- 2 -
sampled. The sample pits were dug to an average depth ofO.9 m to reach the essentially unoxidized
C-horizon of the till. The till samples were processed to I;:xtract any available gold grains for
classification, measurement and gold assay calculation. For all samples, a -0.063 mm clay + silt
subsample of the raw, unprocessed till was analyzed geochemically to identifY any broad scale
associations between gold and other elements. The total contract sampling and geology costs for the
program were $27914.58 or $473.13/sample.
All till samples yielded gold grains with the strongest anomaly being 53 grains significantly
exceeding the one to ten grains per sample background. If the targets were gold alone the anomalies
would all be considered weak but for the gold component of VMS mineralization they could
represent significant anomalies. For the -0.063 mm geochemical fraction, Au values are generally
<2 ppb and As values are consistently low (0.8 t07.7 ppm). One till sample, collected overtop
bedrock anomalous in Au, Ag, Zn, Cd, Pb and eu at the north end of Off Lake, is strongly
anomalous in Zn (768 ppm) and significantly anomalous in Pb (35 ppm). The gold grain and till
geochemical results define eight anomalous target areas that are mostly suggestive of VMS fertility
and requiring further investigation. The targets identified from gold grains using a 20-grain
threshold with a significant proportion of pristine or modified grains, are: (1) along the western shore
of Off Lake, south of Spring Lake and north of French Road; (2) along the northwest shore of Burditt
Lake, west of Buckhorn Point; (3) southwest of Cedar Lake; (4) northeast of Pony Lake; and (5)
north of Boundary Lake between Beadle and Preachers Lakes. Three targets have been identified
from analysis of the -0.063 mm clay + silt fraction. These are: (I) southwest of Spring Lake where
Sample 03 is anomalous in Cu (149 ppm), Zn (153 ppm) and Mn (1740 ppm); (2) west of the
southern margin of Off Lake, where Sample 43 is weakly anomalous in Cu (114 ppm); and (3) north
of Potts Lake where Sample 46 is weakly anomalous in Cu (123 ppm).
On the basis of this first phase of till sampling, follow-up till sampling and prospecting on all five
gold grain defined targets and the -0.063 mm Cu-Zn-Mn target southwest of Spring Lake is
recommended to further defme the anomalies and develop drill targets. The estimated cost of this
approximately 60-sample program is $30,000 and acquisition of, or access to, only minimal
additional land is required. The above targets should be further prioritized using recommendations
from a report currently being prepared by Dr. L.D. Ayres, who is studying centres of felsic volcanism
• and VMS mineralization on the property.
•
•
- 3 -
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Property Location, Access, Ownership, Geology and Exploration History
From July 24 to July 31, 2006 Rainy River Resources Limited (RRR), through contractor
Overburden Drilling Management Limited (ODM), conducted a heavy mineral geochemical till
sampling program on its Off Lake property. The property is located approximately 30 km north of
the town of Emo, Ontario near the Manitoba - Minnesota borders and is easily accessed via
Provincial Road 615, which leads directly north from Emo into the Off Lake - Burditt Lake area, as
well as by numerous logging roads that branch eastward from Highway 71 (Fig, 1).
The property, which consists of 52 mostly unpatented c1aims totaling 631 units or 10,096 hectares,
is approximately 25 km northeast of and contiguous with RRR's main Richardson Township
property (Fig, 1) where extensive diamond drilling is being conducted to establish National
Instrument 43-1 0 1 compliant reserves on the large volcanogenic, 17 Zone gold deposit and the small
34 Zone Ni-Cu-PGE-Au massive sulphide deposit (RRR press release November 3,2006), both of
which were discovered by Nuinsco Resources (Jones, 1993). The claims cover parts of Menary,
Senn, Fleming and Potts Townships. Geologically, the property lies centrally in the Archean-age
(~2700 Ma) Rainy River Greenstone Belt which forms part of the Wabigoon Subprovince of the
Superior Province of the Canadian Shield (Fig. 2). Mapping by Blackburn (1976) established that
the Off Lake - Burditt Lake area is dominated by a 4.6 km thick, southwest trending, southeast
facing mainly greenschist facies metavolcanic assemblage approximately 8 km in exposed width
bounded by the trondhjemitic Sabaskong Batholith to the north and west, by monzonitic and
granodioritic rocks of the Burditt Lake Stock and granodiorites and diorites of the Jackfish Lake
Complex to the east and by the Fleming Township trondhjemites to the south (Fig. 3). The
metavolcanics on the Off Lake property include three units. The lowermost unit, in the northwest,
consists of mafic flows intruded by numerous quartz-feldspar porphyry dykes. It is overlain by a
second mafic unit that is characterized by a change from mainly massive to mainly pillowed and
• porphyritic flows. The upper unit, in the southeast, consists of felsic (dacitic), mainly fragmental
OFF LAKE PROJECT LOCATION: Northwestern Ontario
o 5 10
kilometres
USA
• Rainy River Resources land position: unpatented claims, optioned patents, lease
Figure 1 - Geographic location and extent of Rainy River Resources' Off Lake and Richardson Township properties. Modified from an original version courtesy of Karen Rees.
I
.j:>.
•
•
•
Thompson Bel!
Bird River
Provincial boundary
InTernaTional boundary
Subprovince boundary
Li m l! of exposed Archean rocks
D Wabigoon Subprovince
Rainy River Greenstone Belt
- 5 -
Cape Be lt
Hudson Boy
N
\
o 250 500 . Ki lometers
Figure 2 - Regional geological setting of the Off Lake property. Source: Blackburn et al., 1991 .
•
•
• 10
8 • N11-267
*
o
PI'ebminaI1' sample loc .. tion No.lO
O(;S pit sampl .. NB-267 with 8 \ 'hiblt' gold gmills
l\lint'l":IloaUlT"Il("t'
RRR claim bolllld",'~'
Oth.". chlim bowldlll'~'
Roadsffnlils
Powel'lint'
kilolUt'tl't'S
S ... lIe = 1 :50,000
2
QUATENNAftV
~LlIITOCINI AND MCIJfT
UNCOMIOJIIIWITY
PRECAMBRIAN"
MIDDLE TO LATE PRECAMBRIAN IPROTEROZOIC)
IHTJlUa.VIE CONY ACT
EARLY PRECAMBRIAN (ARCHEAN) MA"'. C I NT .. ualve: "OCK •
, Ih/ICQI
I HTJlUa. ..... COffTACT
tr'"1I.L..StC TO INTEftMEDIATI!. ~LUTONIC NOCKa
LATE TlCTOOIIC INTIIUIIIYE !lOCKS
4 Ilrlsubd." ,. Potplt,,,tlC QfAltJ rrtOi'IlOn./M .M
glenodfotIW (Bled I,... Mtd &tdllt LMtitaJucb)
0t.I (}twU ,nonllJlllI~ MIll QI~'''' toOUIO'''''' (8Iac.it ~ •• FIIlMft(I and Burdttf UM alold.).
&: Wonl'Onfflt.e-QU ... an..-,fa..c· ....... 1l SIoek).
~ ,..,..,., . ..,• "fTlllu.,,, .. c.otrfTACT
SYNTECTONIC INTItUIIY( AND IIET AIIOIIPHIC IIOCKS"
GRAMTIC INTRUSIVE .NO un .IoOOAPHtC ROC~S 5 Un_._ 51 T l0tt4h~IIIt". OI.~'Oflt • .
--(-""-~ ~ (,r.,w,c ..... _ .. ~
x I'otpll"tiA. I./tMttJ tnOntonb. XI MGnzoruM 51 """"'",ond_IJI. ~I l),ot,l.
'NT fllMfOlA Tf ..acKY I U~fIIIttI "5 __
.. -<r I'otpilrlllJC""-", __ ,,, 111_"' __ '" ULTftAMAP"IC "OCKS
II SM""fl/vt~ L-!.....-.J .. TIJc ",tt.;"
INTlltUaiVS CQe.lTACT
METAVOLCANIC.
't!.SIC TO INTUlllfD'A TE IIET A VOLCANIC50
I Un.lUOGlr..., ,. RIt,oitlC M'Id ."te ..... &. ' 10 PotlJhr'''IC. 'h~tc_ MttJ
,. ... (quMl.I./.-J5IMI
~ ~::-r,a'f:It~pllllf ,. Tu/t.MI1UI,-lult , MrtJ JljpNI,JI/1I'tf! " ru"-bl«t'~ MW1 ~toduhc /)Ieeee Iv ev.rt6-1eithpw 1JItob1. «ItJIl' lit ~/tI.Zr'f). tnatlli.Jln gt .. n«J
..... FIC TO INTERUEDI ... TE MET A VOLCANIC"
, (Jn~1dIc1
fe ""um to I,,.,,,etMtd oa.IfJC enMSlIIC,..u.
10 COIII_'1I'.wtttJ ~I.JA '-"e.:. . 'c f'oI(Jh'l'ttlC m.i,c Mrti Id P,I/oW«J tnlJ/lC Jlt-u. I. PrIItJw«l por"",,~ic rrvl/rt' ,.., " Tuf/6t'Kc.Ie._III IIJ/f.M4/lollf. III Amp/UIK»t.'_ gteFn«). ,1) AI~"ICMnD/lIIIt1iI*(.(JIIIIWf J.
Figure 3 - Local geological setting of the Off Lake !property with preliminary sample locations and mineral occurrences. Source: Blackburn, 1976.
•
•
•
7-
rocks. In the southeast corner of the property both the mafic and felsic volcanics bend 90°,
apparently due to cross folding, and continue 10 km southeast off the property to Manomin Lake
where they have been metamorphosed to amphibolite grade.
The Archean basement was once overlain by poorly consolidated Jurassic and Cretaceous sandstone
and shale but these sediments only locally survived Pleistocene glaciation. During glaciation the
Rainy River area was subject to an early advance of the Labradorean ice sheet from the northeast
producing a silty, sandy, stony, basement-derived, geochemically-responsive till. This advance was
followed by a later glacial advance of Keewatin ice from the west through bottom sediments of
glacial Lake Agassiz producing a thick, clayey, clast-poor, conductive, exploration-hindering till over
much of the area. Grassroots exploration in the Richardson Township area was hampered by the
presence of Keewatin Till and reverse-circulation driHing was required to reach the Labradorean Till
which led to the discovery of the 17 Zone. Keewatin ice advance was, however, impeded by high
ground to the northeast in the Off Lake area (Bajc, 1991; Fig. 4). Here, Labradorean Till is present
at surface and although discontinuous, can easily be sampled in hand-dug pits.
Baker (2006) provides a thorough description of the exploration history for the Off Lake area which
dates back to the 1930s. The early exploration programs resulted in the discovery and definition of
three distinct styles of mineralization: (1) high-grade but very small lode gold deposits associated
with quartz veining near the Sabaskong Batholith in the northwest portion of the claim block (e.g.
Wagg Prospect, Agassiz Showings, and the Dillman Showings; Fig. 3); (2) low-grade Cu and Zn
mineralized zones hosted within northeast-trending tuffaceous units in the central portion of the
claim block; and (3) Au-rich volcanogenic massive sulphide (VMS) mineralization associated with
the southeastern felsic volcanics (e.g. Stares Option - OffLak(~ Highway, Stares and Tower Zones,
Will and Teddy Bear Showings; Fig. 3) having a precious - base metal association similar to the
disseminated volcanogenic gold mineralization in Richardson Township but with a higher Ag:Au
ratio as expected in a VMS environment (Jones, 1995).
•
LEGEND
ZONE I - Highland with "cry thin dr ift co\'er nnd nearh' continotls bedrock outcrop
ZONE 2a - LOII'Iand with ,'ariabk drift Ihickn~ss and Illll1lenJlI ~ bedrock olltcrop'
ZONE 2t.J - Lvydilnd wilh thid.;. JriH Jnd 5p~ii;idi~ bedrock outcrop
Labradorean ice direction
10 ===== .. .1
\) 5
Scale = I : 5UO. UOU
• • 93° 31l'
.t9° 00'
Ijii.-()lIIillg nil'
.... .. _ _ .!..I_ ·.-..n,rn. wars" Em'
• LA Y.-\LLI':I':
Figure 4 - Regional physiography and drift thickness map of the Rainy River area. Modified from Bajc, 1991.
00
•
•
•
- 9-
The Ontario Geological Survey (OGS), between 1987 and 1990, undertook an extensive overburden
sampling program in the Fort Frances - Rainy River area in an attempt to revitalize mineral
exploration (Bajc, 1991). Approximately 600 till and glaciofluvial sand and gravel samples were
obtained from sonic boreholes, backhoe trenches and hand-dug pits. Within the current limits of the
Off Lake property 28 hand-dug pit samples were taken with only a few samples yielding higher than
the background gold values of 0 to 1 grains. Two till samples, one from the southern shore of Off
Lake (NB-267; Fig. 3) and the other from the western shore of Burditt Lake (NB-18; Fig. 3), yielded
8 and 10 gold grains respectively, most of which were either modified or pristine (Fig. 5) suggesting
local derivation. These anomalies are very weak compared to those obtained by the OGS from sonic
drill hole samples in Richardson Township (up to 70 grains); however, the mineralization there
consists of gold with only minor base metal credits rather than base metals with subordinate gold as
in the VMS occurrences at Off Lake. Moreover, detailed examination of the OGS data indicates
significant variability in the sampling and suggests that the anomalies may be understated as more
than 90 per cent of the OGS surface till samples were undersized with bulk weights in the range of
4 to 6 kg. The standard till sample size for gold exploration is ~ 1 0 kg (Averill, 2001). Therefore,
the samples may not have provided an accurate representation of the gold response in the till.
2.2 Scope and Objectives of the Sampling Program
RRR's till sampling extended across the property but focused primarily on testing the felsic units to
search for gold-rich VMS mineralization. Only one traverse was made across the mafic unit along
the western portion of the property to test for vein-type lode gold mineralization.
Gold is subordinate to Cu-Zn-Pb mineralization in the known VMS occurrences at Off Lake (Table
1) but gold grains are the only component of the mineralization capable of surviving in weathered
till and providing visual evidence of nearby VMS mineralization. An airborne Time Domain
Electromagnetic (VTEM) survey conducted over parts of the property for RRR in March of 2006
produced no significant electromagnetic anomalies within the current survey area, indicating that if
• • • Till Gold Grain Morphology
Pristine Modified Reshaped
100 m 500 m >1,000 to >10,000 m
Distance of Transport
Figure 5 - Backscatter electron images of gold grains from till illustrating the relationship between grain wear and distance of transport. The wear processes are compressional (infolding and compaction) and do not reduce the mass of the gold grain . Scale bars = 50 urn. Source: Averill , 200l.
-""'"' I
•
•
•
- 11 -
DDH NS95-01
Sample From To Length Au Ag Pb Cu Zn Number (m) (m) (m) (ppb) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
3669 36.58 38.10 1.52 5 0.6 10 42 425 3670 38.10 38.60 0.50 <5 0.4 24 4 540 3671 38.60 39.30 0.70 25 2.4 49 36 1010 3672 39.30 40.12 0.82 50 4.2 63 120 5700 3673 40.12 40.72 0.60 95 5.2 81 105 3100 3674 40.72 41.47 0.75 25 2.8 69 87 1700 3675 41.47 41.87 0.40 90 7.4 123 340 6100 3676 41.87 42.35 0.48 525 13.0 680 690 6100 3677 42.35 42.77 0.42 3940 21.8 3090 1530 24400 3678 42.77 44.29 1.52 40 2.2 35 152 610
Table 1 - Geochemical analyses of Nuinsco Resources Ltd. diamond drill core samples from Hole NS95-01 from the Stares Option near the northeast corner of Off Lake. Note the subordinate Au values as compared to Cu, Zn and Pb. Source: Jones, 1995.
•
•
- 12-
any economic VMS deposits are present they are deeply buried and, at most, their low-grade distal
fringes were exposed to glaciation. Therefore, any till-hosted gold anomalies related to VMS
mineralization would be weak.
In general the geology strikes subparallel to southwest ice flow (~2200; Fig. 3). In this setting, tilJ
hosted gold grain dispersal trains derived from economically significant gold deposits tend to be
ribbon-shaped, typically 100 to 200 m wide and -1 km long (F ig. 6). Shorter, apron-shaped trains
(Fig. 6) would be expected in the southeast comer of the property where the key felsic volcanics
bend sharply southeast perpendicular to ice flow. Since gold is not the main component of the VMS
mineralization at Off Lake and no large zones of massive mineralization are exposed, gold grain
dispersal trains in the till here would tend to be shorter than those associated with straight gold
deposits. The sampling pattern chosen for the program was therefore a compromise, with a 300 x
300 m spacing in the most prospective areas, provided sufficient Labradorean Till was available, and
a wider spacing elsewhere. F or the program to be successful, samples of uniformly high quality were
required. To ensure sample quality preliminary sample sites chosen in the office (Fig. 3) were
adjusted in the field to obtain quality subglacial tilL If optimal conditions could not be met then
no sample was taken. The conditions are based upon fundamental principles of till formation as
described below. In describing the till, the generic terms supraglacial and subglacial are used
because they clearly convey whether the till accumulated on top of or below the ice and thus whether
it is primarily of proximal or distal provenance, pristine or reworked and suitable or unsuitable for
exploration sampling.
Ice sheets thin by meltdown during periods of global warming and ice fronts 'retreat' for the same
reason while the ice itself is still moving forward. The underlying bedrock is continually eroded by
two processes: (1) plucking along fractures which produces large block:;, especially of jointed
granitic rocks, and (2) grinding which produces silty rock flour. Most of this debris accumulates in
the lower few metres of the ice sheet (Fig. 7a) and is sufficiently concentrated that comminution
continues through direct inter-particle contact during glacial transport. At the same time angular
• blocks, especially of massive, granitic rocks that resist further breakage, progressively become
•
•
•
- 13 -
LEGEND
• Mineralized zone
~ Direction of ice flow
Anomalous Analytical Area Fraction -- Raw Till
Low grade cone. or cone. from small sample
High grade cone . and visible gold grain iofo. from large sample
o 100 200 300 400 500 ~--~--~--~--~
I: 12500
Figure 6 - Expected sizes and shapes of gold dispersal trains fr·om cross-ice (southeast trending) and ice-parallel (southwest trending) gold zones.
• • • 200~----------------------------------------~ 20
en Q)
~ 100 2
0
200
(f) Q) ..... - 100 Q)
~
0
a c
• , • • . , . - • • •
100 200 100 200 Kilometres Metres
D Debris-free ice b
[;tJ Ice with thinly dispersed, mainly distal debris
~ ..•... ~. Ice with concentrated, mainly proximal debris
D Glaciolacustrine clay or outwash sand
D Supraglacial till
- r-----1 • Subglacial till I . , • • , • Greenstone bedrock/rubble
• Large , rounded granitic boulder
../ Direction of ice flow
10 20 Kilometres
Figure 7 - Schematic sections showing: (a) pre-meltdown generation; (b) syn-meltdown deposition; and (c) post-meltdown modification of supraglacial and subglacial till over a greenstone belt. Note the difference in scale between sections.
-+:>.
•
•
•
- 15 -
rounded. However ice flow is laminated, with the upper layers advancing over and imbricating
slightly upward from the bottom layers such that any debris escaping from the basal zone becomes
thinly dispersed upward for tens of metres where it can be transported long distances with no further
comminution. Once the ice thins to this level through meltdown,. exposing the distal debris, this
debris begins to accumulate on the ice surface where its fine matrix is susceptible to winnowing by
meltwater. Eventually, when ice meltdown is complete, the coarse residue or lag from the distal
debris is deposited as supraglacial till directly upon undisturbed subglacial till of more proximal
provenance (Fig. 7b). The underlying subglacial till is typically 0.5 to 3 m thick with the thickest
sections occurring in bedrock depressions. Sections exceeding 5 m are generally restricted to regions
where the till was derived from soft, easily eroded substrate, as in a young sedimentary basin or large
meltwater lake, and was molded into drumlins.
Although armoured by bouldery supraglacial till, the subglacial till is susceptible to erosion until a
protective forest cover is established. Over greenstone belts not flooded by glacial lakes, most
bedrock highs eventually become rock outcrops topped by only a few large, perched lag boulders,
mainly of rounded, distal granite from the supraglacial till (Fig. 7c). Minor hollows in the outcrops
and any steep slopes adjoining these outcrops become mantled by stony, angular rubble which is
partly lag from eroded subglacial till but mostly bedrock dislodged by frost action. Texturally this
rubble is matrix deficient and compositionally it reflects only the immediate subadjacent bedrock
rather than that for a significant distance up-ice. It is therefore unsuitable fhr exploration sampling.
Further downhill where the slope moderates, the distal granitic boulders tend to be partly submerged
rather than perched, indicating that the supraglacial till has not been totally eroded and the underlying
subglacial ti111ayer is fully intact. Large supraglacial till boulders nonnally settle ~ 0.1 m into the
compact, 0.5 to 3 m thick subglacial till. Therefore a scattering of I m granitic boulders with 0.4 m
exposed and 0.6 m submerged will normally signify the presence underfoot of up to 0.5 m of
supraglacial till and at least 0.5 m of subglacial till - conditions ideal for sampling with a 1 m deep
shovel pit. Further downhill on the edge of adjoining flats, both the supraglacial and subglacial till
are normally well preserved but may be completely covered by sand and silt winnowed from the
•
•
- 16 -
upslope tiB or by glaciofluvial outwash sand if an esker occurs nearby or glaciolacustrine clays ifthe
flats were flooded by a glacial lake. This sand or clay cover will be apparent from a complete
absence of exposed granitic boulders.
3. METHODS AND COSTS
3.1 Contractors
RRR contracted ODM to plan and conduct the till sampling program. A 60-sample program was
developed at a budgeted cost of approximately $33,800 (Table 2) on tht~ assumption that six till
samples would be collected per day in addition to some boulder and rock outcrop samples. ODM's
field geologist was David Hozjan; he was assisted by W. Averill, ofRRR. RRR's field office in
Emo was used as the base of operations .
Remy Huneault supervised ODM's sample processing in Nepean, and David Hozjan interpreted the
data and prepared the report with assistance from Stuart Averill. Actlabs Limited of Ancaster,
Ontario, performed geochemical analyses on selected till fractions.
3.2 Field Procedures
Preliminary till sample locations were selected using a combination of stereo airphotos and
topographic and geological maps. On Blackburn's 1976 geological map of the area, which was used
as a base for plotting the sample sites in Figure 3, the lake immediately NNW of Off Lake is named
Preachers Lake and the lake -0.8 km west of it is unnamed. On the topographic maps however,
Blackburn's Preachers Lake is named Spring Lake and his unnamed lake is referred to as Preachers
Lake. References to lake names in this report are based on those given on the topographic maps;
therefore the names on Figure 3 have been changed. Final sample locations (Fig. 8) were adjusted
• in the field to ensure that high-quality subglacial till was sampled. The geographic coordinates of
• - 17 -
Total Costs Budget Actual
Service Com~any $Total $/sample $Total $/sample
1. Pre-field planning,sampie layout ODM 2000.00 33.33 3217.73 54.54
2. Field sampling, travel ODM 8920.00 148.67 5229.69 88.64
3. Sample/equipment shipping Manitoulin Transport 990.00 16.50 1169.41 19.82
4. Sample processing ODM 6924.00 115.40 4697.25 79.61
5. Analyti(:al Actlabs 2057.50 34.29 2745.50 46.53
6. Report ODM 11000.00 183.33 10855.00 183.98
• TOTALS 31891.50 531.53 27914.58 473.13
GST 1913.49 24.53 1674.87 28.39
GRAND TOTALS 33804.99 433.40 29589.45 501.52
• Table 2 - Comparison of budgeted and actual project cost.
53 • Sample FL06-07 with 53
06-07 ,-bible gold gmins
RRR claim bOUlldlll)' 00
II Olhel" daim bOlUld II I)'
RoadslTrails
----- PoweJ"line
o 2
ki!omeh"es
Senl .. = 1:50.000
Figure 8 - Actual till sampJe locations with gold grain counts.
•
•
- 19-
the sample sites were measured by GPS (Table 3). Sample pits were dug using a hand shovel and
grubhoe to an average depth 0[0.9 m to reach the essentially unoxidized C-horizon ofthe subglacial
till. The till was screened at 6 mm to remove most of the large clasts and produce approximately 10
kg of -6 mm matrix. The matrix material was packed into 30 x :50 cm plastic sample bags along with
a 1 kg representative sample of +6 mm clasts. The sample bags were sealed using plastic cable ties
and placed into 20 litre plastic shipping pails. The pits were filled in to the original ground level
after sampling.
The samples were prefixed FL06 (for Off Lake property, 2006) and were numbered consecutively
from Olin the sequence collected. In total 59 till samples were taken, including 3 duplicate samples
for quality control purposes. Sixteen samples were obtained from road cuts with exposed till (Plate
1) and did not require pits. Two samples, Nos. 04 and 44, were accidentaHy taken on patented land
not held by RRR. The sealed shipping pails were transported from Fort Frances to ODM's Nepean
laboratory by Manitoulin Transport.
3.3 Sample Processing and Gold Grain Observation Procedures
The till samples were processed using the procedures shown in Figure 9. These procedures are
designed to progressively reduce the bulk sample and expose the gold grains, which are mainly silt
sized. Prior to processing, two 400 g character splits were taken from each till sample: one for
archiving and one for sieving to produce a -0.063 mm fraction for geochemical analysis. The
remaining bulk samples were wet screened at 2.0 mm with the +2.0 mm clasts stored (Appendix B).
The -2.0 mm till matrix was concentrated with a shaking table. Geological observations on the
character ofthe sample were made during both the screening and tabling operations (Appendix C).
The gold grains extracted during tabling and subsequent micropanning of24 samples (mainly those
with ten or more gold grains) were counted, measured and classified according to their degree of
wear (i.e. distance of glacial transport; Fig. 5) and gold assay values for the concentrate were
calculated from the grains (Table 4, Appendix C). The gold grains were then returned to the table
• concentrates which were then dried and stored.
- 20
Sample Site Easting Northing Depth (m) Ty)e Bedrock
• Reached
FL06-01 437896 5418758 1.0 Shovel Yes FL06-02 437867 5418540 0.9 Shovel No FL06-03 438537 5418532 1.8 Road Cut 1\'0
FL06-04 438691 5417824 1.1 Road Cut No FL06-05 440256 5418882 0.9 Road Cut Yes FL06-06 438363 5416454 1.6 Road Cut No FL06-07 437937 5416519 0.8 Shovel No FL06-08 438315 5417526 0.8 Shovel No FL06-09 442198 5417957 LO Shovel 1\'0
FL06-10 440790 5417728 0.7 Shovel No FL06-11 440467 5418428 0.9 Shovel No FL06-12 439669 5418385 1.5 Road Cut No FL06-13 440061 5419275 0.7 Shovel 1\'0
FL06-14 440837 5419344 0.7 Shovel No FL06-15 441074 5419764 0.7 Shovel No FL06-16 441016 5420093 0.7 Shovel No FL06-17 441395 5420373 0.7 Shovel No FL06-18 440792 5421140 1.5 Road Cut No FL06-19 440854 5420807 0.6 Shovel Yes FL06-20 440650 5420530 0.7 Road Cut No FL06-21 440490 5420475 0.7 Shovel No FL06-22 440965 5420380 1.0 Road Cut No FL06·23 442466 5423820 0.6 Shovel Yes FL06-24 441837 5422965 0.6 Shovel No FL06-25 441110 5421892 0.5 Shovel. Yes FL06-26 442006 5418545 0.5 Shovel Yes
• FL06-27 441909 5418685 0.6 Shovel No FL06-28 438882 5421073 1.0 Road Cut No FL06-29 438947 5420673 0.8 Shovel No FL06-30 439425 5420263 0.5 Shovel Yes FL06-31 439817 5419670 0.5 Shovel No FL06-32 439849 5420198 0.7 Shovel No FL06-33 440778 5419593 0.5 Shovel No FL06-34 439558 5418904 0.6 Shovel No FL06-35 437506 5417747 0.8 Shovel Yes FL06-36 437337 5417858 0.8 Shovel No FL06-37 436752 5417102 0.6 Shovel Yes FL06-38 436659 5417394 0.5 Shovel No FL06-39 438631 5415738 0.8 Shovel No FL06-40 439051 5415956 1.0 Shovel No FL06-41 435454 5415046 0.6 Shovel No FL06-42 435754 5415208 0.6 Shovel No FL06-43 436004 5415314 0.7 Shovel Yes FL06-44 438880 5417870 3.7 Road Cut No FL06-45 432677 5419057 1.5 Road Cut No FL06-46 432996 5419236 1.5 Road Cut Yes FL06-47 433575 5419480 0.8 Shovel No FL06-48 433970 5419538 0.8 Shovel Yes FL06-49 434309 5419303 1.0 Road Cut No FL06-50 434865 5419074 0.7 Shovel 1\'0 FL06-51 435307 5419140 0.7 Road Cut No FL06-S2 436274 5418822 1.0 Shovel No FL06-53 436813 5418845 0.7 Shovel No FL06-54 437185 5419036 0.7 Road Cut Yes
• FL06-55 437586 5418999 1.2 Road Cut No FL06-56 437564 5419417 0.6 Shovel Yes
Table 3 - Pit sample data.
•
•
•
- 21 -
Plate 1 - Typical sample taken from a road cut till exposure. Note the grey, essentially unoxidized nature ofthe subglacial till and the angular, locally derived greenstone clasts.
• - 22 -
Excess: STORE
-'. -',' . '. .. ,,~ r~:r,
Character Sample, -400 g: ""'- Bulk Sample 10-15 kg: Character Sample, -400 g:
STORE STORE I---- Dry Sieve al -0_063 mm
«:1_
~
Clasts, >2.0 mm: Table Split: -0.063 mm Clay Fraction:
STORE Disaggregate (if required); Analyze for Au and Base Metals
Wet Sieve at 2.0 mm
.-~
,
• I Table Concentrate: Table Reject:
<2.0 mm: Mi cropan for Additional oJ
Table Separation; ~ f--STORE Gold Grains
Count Visible Gold Grains (selected samples)
-~ .::-
, Table Concentrate: I
Calculate Assay Value
1 of Gold Grain~
• Figure 9 - Heavy mineral processing flowsheet for the till samples.
•
•
•
Samplt~ Sumber
FL-06-01 FL-06-02 FL-06-03 FL-06-04 FL-06-05 FL-06-06 FL-06-07 FL-06-08 FL-06-09 FL-06-10 FL-06-ll FL-06-12 FL-06-13 FL-06-14 Duplicate of No, 14 FL-06-J5 FL-06-16 FL-06-17 FL-06-JS FL-06-19 FL-06-20 FL-06-21 FL-06-22 FL-06-23 FL-06-24 FL-06-2S FL-06-26 FL-06-27 FL-06-28 FL-06-29 FL-06-30 FL-06-31 FL-06-32 FL-06-33 FL-06-34 FL-06-35 FL-06-36 FL-06-37 FL-06-38 FL-06-39 FL-06-40 FL-06-41 FL-06-42 FL-06-43 FL-06-44 Duplicate of No, 44 FL-06-45 FL-06-46 FL-06-47 FL-06-48 FL-06-49 FL-06-50 FL-06-5] FL-06-52 FL-06-53 FL-06-54 FL-06-55 FL-06-56 Duplicate of "No, 56
- 23
"'umber of Visible Gold Grains :\'onmag
HMC --------------- Weight -
Total Reshaped Modified Pristine
7 20 14 24 11 24 53 5 5
20 2 8
16 11 10 4 7 12 5 6 1 5
26 35 16 \0 10 3
23 35 JO 7 10 30 22 23 7
14 7
22 9 5 5
23 38 3 8 8
28 16 41 34 40 53 4 24 17 35
2 3 3 II 5 5
15
4 15 2 5 o 13 9 7 3 5 6 o 4 1 2 13 31 8 10 5
6 16 7 6 3 10 3 10 2 7 4 10 4 3 1 3 12
I 5 10 11 26 4 16 28 3 6 10 6
3 9 J 3 2 2
23 1 o 4 o 3 o 3 1 3
2 6 3
o
5 2 8 o o o 5 5 1 1 4 7 I 4 2 3 I 6 2 o o
11 o 4 1 6 4 12 14 7 10
8 4 13
2 8 10 10 4 17 IS 3 I 1 o o 1 o I o o o o 2 I o 2 8 2 o o 5 2 12 14 2
o 3 13 18 9 3 4 2 6 3 2 4 19 15 2 3 2 12 I 3 16 17 15 o 10 3 16
(g)
28.8 38.4 22
30,8 36.4 332 27.6 28.8 33.6 37.2 36.8 28.8 28.4 31.2 33.2 32,8
36.4 31.6
36.08 29.2 27.2 32,8
32.4 30
30,8 31.6 35.2 28.4 29.6 37.2 32.8 33.2 22
41.6 36
45.6 40.8 34.8 38
35.6 41.6 40.4 40
23.6 32.8 32.8 37.6 42.8 39.2 37.6 39.2 32.8 40.4 40,8 38.4 37.6 36
35.2 33.2
Calculated PPB Visible Gold in HMC
Total Reshaped Modified Pristine
]J
137 4] 76
481 43
435 9
1150 106 6 15 <I 36 38 140
5 3 10 10 I 7
639 718 35 II 26 43 86
444 90
276 47 157 61 112 755 17 77
234 29 38 15 129 524
I 23 24 117 39 237 352 100 lO2 3
89 124 49
8 108 34 65 467 17
198 7
1147 95 6 8 o
33 27 139
2 2 o 10
2 622 716 32 II 19 34 47 209 83 275 23 103 39 98 741 14 7
116 12 37 3
45 256
1 4 22 77 26 85 7 64 79 3
50 114 19
2 17 <I 2 3
202 <I o 6 a 7 o 3
<1
I <1 3 I 6 <I o
10 2 3 o o o 9
82 6 I
22 23
7 II
10 100 5 o o 1
21 o
11 I
21 12 38 15 16 15 <1 16 9 16
4 12 7 10 12 25 35 2 2 5 o o
<J o 11 o o o o 4
<1 o 5 8
o o 7 9
29 153
I o 3
30 22 7 4 1
59 18 12 1 II 83
247 <I 7 I
19 J
115 330 19 8 o
23 I
14
•
•
•
- 24-
3.4 Analytical Procedures
For each till sample 20 to 30 g of -0.063 mm clay + silt was sieved from one unprocessed subsample
and was analyzed by the instrumental neutron activation (INA) method primarily for Au and As
(most oth~r elements included in this analytical package are imprecisely measured) and a 5 g split
was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) primarily for more precise
Ag, Cu, Zn, Pb and Ni values (Appendix D).
3.5 Quality Assurance and Quality Controll\leasures
Three duplicate till samples were taken and inserted and processed in order to test ODM's gold grain
recovery and Actlab's analytical precision and detection limits. These duplicate samples, labelled
57,58 and 59, were taken from sample sites 14,44 and 56, respectively. The sample material was
screened into a pail and then the screened material was scooped altemately into two bags. One bag
was labelled with the proper sample number and the other was temporarily labelled Duplicate 1,2
and 3 in the order that they were taken. The final sample numbers for the duplicates were
permanently labelled at the end of the program. The correlation between duplicates and original
samples was not disclosed to ODM's processing staff. In addition, three -0.063 mm splits of a
natural, ODM till standard labelled 01 B, 25B and 51 B were used to test Actlab 's analytical precision.
The standard is weakly anomalous in Au and base metals ..
4. RESULTS
4.1 Overburden Conditions
As predicted, although much of the surface of the Off Lake property consists of bedrock outcrops,
till is well-exposed between outcrops resulting in a successful sampling program. The presence or
absence of large, rounded granitic, boulders in the upper subglacial till was used to quickly and
reliably evaluate whether significant underlying subglacial till would be present (Fig. 7).
•
•
- 25 -
Of the 63 proposed sample locations (Fig. 3), 12 sites were abandoned because no till was present
within approximately 100 m. Proposed sites 19 and 21 south of Preachers Lake and sites 59 and 62
along the northwest shore of Burditt Lake were in areas of rugged bedrock exposure with no
overburden or only a thin veneer of rubble overlying bedrock. Proposed sites 27, 30, 41, 46 and 47
were in areas underlain by sand and grave] and sites 6, 39 and 53 in areas underlain by well-sorted,
fine- to medium-grained sand. These glaciofluvial sediments are associated with the Rainy Lake -
Lake of the Woods Moraine which locally traverses Rowe, Menary, Potts and Fleming Townships.
To partly compensate for the abandoned sites, five unplanned samples were collected during the
course of the program.
4.2 Gold Grain Abundance
Visible gold grains were recovered from all 56 samples and all 3 duplicate samples (Table 4;
Appendix C). Gold grain abundance ranges from 1 to 53 grains per sample. The property
background level gold grain counts are in the range of 1 to 10 grains (50th percentile and lower).
This background is significantly higher than the 0 to 1 grains of the OGS survey (Bajc, 1991),
reflecting the better quality and uniformly larger size ofRRR's samples. Nineten samples yielded
>20 gold grains. If the targets were gold alone these values would all be considered weak since the
best response is only 53 grains but for the gold component of VMS mineralization they could
represent very significant anomalies. Most of the gold grains are silt-sized «0.063 mm wide) and
33 percent are pristine.
Calculated visible gold assays based on a 250: 1 concentration factor for the samples (Table 4) range
from <1 to 1150 ppb. Using the well-established rule that heavy mineral gold assays roughly match
the gold grade of the bedrock source mineralization (Sauerbrei et al., 1987), even the strongest
anomalies are weak. Furthermore, at least three are due to the nugget effect or due to an abnormally
high concentration of far-traveled, reshaped grains. The 1150 ppb value, from Sample 09 which
yielded only 5 gold grains, is clearly the result of one 100 x 200 x 250 micron reshaped nugget
• (Appendix C). The two next most anomalous assays, 755 and 718 ppb :fi~om Samples 37 and 24
•
•
- 26-
respectively, can also be discounted. Sample 37 yielded only 7 gold grains whereas Sample 24
yielded 35 grains. The anomalous assay in Sample 37 is primarily the result of one reshaped (75 x
175 x 250 micron) nugget and the Sample 24 anomaly is the result of 31 reshaped gold grains
including one 100 x150 x 175 micron nugget.
Comparison of gold grain recoveries from original and duplicate samples shows moderate variability
(Fig. 10) reflecting heterogeneous gold grain distribution within the tilL
4.3 -0.063 mm Analyses
The geochemical analyses obtained from the -0.063 mm fraction (Table 5; Appendix D) ofthe raw
till were intended to identify any associations between gold <md other elements on a broad scale
because such analyses are too insensitive to detect a mineralized zone directly unless a sample is
serendipitously collected less than 100 m from the mineralization (Fig. 6). The gold analyses are
generally low «2 ppb) with occasional spikes probably resulting from the random presence of a gold
grain in the relatively small (20 to 30 g) analyzed subsample. Sample 48 returned the highest assay
of only 33 ppb Au but its heavy mineral fraction contained 28 gold grains, ] 2 of which were pristine.
Arsenic values are uniformly low across the entire survey, ranging from 0.8 to 7.7 ppm. No apparent
correlation exists between elevated Au and As assays. Silver values occur at or below the detection
limit (i.e. <0.2 ppm). Sample 05, collected from till on the Stares Option northeast of the north end
of Off Lake on the north side of Provincial Road 615 beneath the main hydro line and overlying
bedrock anomalous in Au, Ag, Zn, Cd, Pb and Cu (Baker, 2006) is strongly anomalous in Zn (768
ppm) and significantly anomalous in Pb (35 ppm) compared to other samples. Copper, at 23 ppm,
is above the detection limit but within the background range for the prop(:rty, and Au, Ag, and Cd
results are at or near detection limits.
Actlabs' geochemical analyses for both the duplicate samples and the ODM till standard (Table 6;
Fig. 11) show slight but acceptable deviation in Au values with consistent reproducibility in the key
• base metals giving a high degree of confidence to the results.
• - 27 -
40,--------------------------------,
35
~ 30 c.. s ~
C/)
-; c 25 °CiJ 0;: FL06-44/S8 • 0 c
'" 20 c 0; ... FL06··S6/59 C,)
f L06-14/S., • '0 • "0 15 C,) '-0 ... {j,j
• .0 e 10 :: z
5
o o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Numil>er of Gold Grains in Duplicate Sample
• Figure 10 - Comparison of gold grain recovery from original and duplicate samples.
•
•
•
Element Units Detection Limit Analysis Method
Sample Number
FL06-01 FL06-OIB FL06-02 FL06-03 FL06-04 FL06-05 FL06-06
FL06-07 FL06-08 FL06-09 FL06-10 FL06-11 FL06-12 FL06-13 FL06-14 Duplicate of No, 14 FL06-IS FL06-16 FL06-17 fL06-18 FL06-J9 FL06-20 FL06-21 FL06-22 FL06-23 FL06-24 FL06-25 fL06-2SB FL06-26 FL06-27 fL06-28 fL06-29 FL06-30 FL06-31 fL06-32 FL06-33 FL06-34 FL06-35 FL06-36 FL06-37 fL06-38 FL06-39 FL06-40 FL06-41 fL06-42 FL06-43 FL06-44 Duplicate of No, 44 fL06-45 fL06-46 fL06-47 fL06-48 fL06-49 fL06-50 fL06-51 FL06-5!B FL06-S2 FL06-53 FL06-54 FL06-55 FL06-56 Duplicate of No. 56
Au ppb
2 INA
<2 <2
9 12
2 9 16 <1 7
2 <2 24 <2 4
<2 <2 <2 4 8 6 II 7
4 <2 5 4 4
7 6 12
2 5
<2 <2 3
<2 5 2
7 8
<2 <2 <~
<2 9 14 26 7
7 3 33 <2 1 2
<2 25 6
<2 6 !4
- 28 -
Ag Cu Pb Zn Cd Mn ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm 0.2 I 2 I 0.5 2
lCP-MS ICP·MS ICP-MS ICP-MS ICP-MS ICP-MS
0.2 0.2 0,2
0.3 < 0.2 0.4
<0.2 <0.2
0.2 0.2 0.3
<\).2
0.3 <0.2 <0.2
<0.2 <0.2 <0,2
0.2 0.2
<0.2
0.2 <0.2 <0.2 < 0.2
0.2 <0,2
0.2 0.2 0.2
<: 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 < 0.2 <0.2
0.2 0,2 0,2 0.2
<0.2 < 0.2 <0.2 < 0.2
0.2 0.2 0,2
< 0.2 0.2
<0.2 < 0.2 0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2 0.2
0.2 < 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 < 0.2
0.2 <0.2
17 114 52
149 91
23 153 42 33 34 15 13
416 35 8 12 24 12 8 19 9
112 15 59 4 12 ')
99 8 16 35 11 9
13
5 16 12 IS 9 11 27 12 15 9
114 43 83 36 123 32 34 43 33 77 101 26 35 18 55 50 60
9 19 7
12 9 35 7
10 9 5 5 8 II 9 5 6 7 6 5 4 6 10 7 6 7 6 7
18 5 5 5 7 6 6 7 7 4 5 7 5 10 7 6 8 5 12 14 17 6 6
4 3 7 7 17 7 8 6 9
6
72 187 67 153 89
768 57 101 85 68 53 98 86 85 55 61
67 64 75 41 64 101 54
101
1I 51 38 162 69 84 67 62 35 36 89 55 51 64 61 58 57 69 54 40 22 63 72 79 57 41 49
39 54 57 73
161 51 <52 :50 84 57 56
0.5 <0.5 <05 < 0.5 < 0,5
0.5 <: 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5
<0.5 <0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < (l.S
<0.5 0.5 0.5 0,5
<0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < 0.5
0.5 0.5
<0.5 < 0.5 <0,5 <0.5 <0,5 < 0.5 < 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.5
< 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 < 0.5 <0.5
0.5 05
< 0.5 < 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 < 0,5 <0.5 <0,5
525 432 452 1740 642 430 328 460 386 295 192 257 316 267 247 320 454 416 264 248 290 986 269 292 121 238 203 350 482 411 323 242 295 289 330 275 205 417 325 266 373 270 236 250 96 133 770 920 364 271 347 295 456 376 563 414 322 396 306 638 413 413
Table 5 - Selected analytical data for the -0.063 mm fraction.
•
•
•
- 29-
Till Sample -0.063 mm Analyses
Au As Ag Cu Zn Pb Mn Ni
~l!l!bl !l!l!m} 11!1!m} ~l!l!m} ~I!pml ~ppml !l!l!ml b~l!ml
FL06-14 4 <0.2 8 55 5 247 24 Duplicate of 14 <2 2 <0.2 12 61 6 320 33 FL06-44 14 6.1 <0.2 43 72 14 770 38 Duplicate of 44 26 7.6 <0.2 83 79 17 920 46 FL06-56 6 3 <0.2 50 57 5 413 42 Duplicate of 56 14 4.3 <0.2 60 56 6 413 43
ODM Standards
FL06-01B 5.5 0.2 114 187 19 432 91 FL06-25B 4 5.5 0.2 99 162 18 350 84 FL06-51B 6.3 0.2 101 167 17 414 82
Table 6 - Comparison of Actlab's geochemical analyses for the -0.063 mm fraction of duplicate till samples and ODM's till standard.
• - 30 -
1000 -L
L _-
~ Q.
100 E
f---- " • Au (ppb) ./ f----• Cu (ppm) -' f----• Mn (ppm) / r--- '" Ni (ppm)
/ -X Pb (ppm)
f---- X In (ppm)
/ <'I f
r/:) ~
<'I
= :§ .. " ~ L • 0
E 0 ... ... '" == <'I ;.. ;... eo:
10 • '" '" ~
/ A / .
/x • f
f .... , L • ./v
/ L
/ /
10 100 1000
Assa)' value from Duplicate Sample
• Figure 11 - Quality control comparison of -0.063 mm assay results for original and duplicate samples. Corresponding original and duplicate sample pairs are shown in blue for Samples FL06-14/57; red for Samples FL06-44/58; and purple for Samples FL06-56/59.
•
•
•
- 31 -
4.4 Target Areas Identified from Go1d Grains
The gold grain data (Figure 8; Table 3) define five main targ~:t areas (Fig. 12) on the property: (1)
along the western shore of Off Lake in the area south of Spring Lake and north of French Road; (2)
along the northwest shore of Burditt Lake, west of Buckhorn Point; 3) southwest of Cedar Lake; (4)
northeast of Pony Lake; and (5) north of Boundary Lake between Beadle Lake to the west and
Preachers Lake to the east.
4.4.1 Off Lake Area
Immediately west of Off Lake, a narrow band of till moderately anomalous in gold grains and
conformable with the southwest ice flow and bedrock trends is defined in the north by Sample 34,
south of Spring Lake, centrally by off-property Samples 04 and 44, and further south by Samples 06
and 07 north of French Road (Fig. 12). Of the gold grains recovered (30, 24,23,24 and 53 grains
respectively) from these samples, 54 to 86 percent were either pristine or modified. The 53 gold
grains recovered from Sample 07 is the strongest gold-in-till anomaly from the survey and of the 53
gold grains 15 are pristine and 23 are modified. The anomalous till is mainly underlain by felsic
volcanic rocks. Historical diamond drilling in the area reported significant VMS-type base metal
results (Blackburn, 1976; Baker, 2006), but no mention of gold.
4.4.2 Buckhorn Point Area
Along the northwestern shore of Burditt Lake, near Buckhorn Point, Samples 23 and 24 yielded
gold-in-till anomalies of 26 and 35 grains respectively. As noted, the Sample 24 anomaly is not
considered significant because 31 of the 35 gold grains are reshaped. Sample 23, collected
approximately I km up-ice from Sample 24, yielded fewer total gold grains but 50 percent of these
grains are pristine or modified and the accompanying till clasts are mainly felsic volcanics suggesting
that the source of the anomaly is in proximal felsic volcanics to the northeast.
53
A Sam pIt' FL06-7 "ilh :"3
06-7 \"!sible gold 1!1.1UL'
* 1\ Iint'I">!1 O~'~U1 ... t'n"("
m Tn,"!!t'l "re" defined b~' gold gmUL'
[!] T,uogcllll'ea deflnNI b)' -U.f16J IIml ,uml)<st's
RRR claim bnw .. IIII~'
II Olhel' ,", .. 1m bOWldlll~o
Ro;ulslTmils
PO\wl'line
0 2
kilomell'es
SCHI .. = I ::;O,UUO
Figure 12 - Target foJlow-up areas derived from gold grain and -0.063 mm geochemical analyseso Note that the numbers in the target areas correspond to the order that the target areas are described in the text.
VJ N
•
•
•
- 33 -
4.4.3 Cedar Lake Area
Southwest of Cedar Lake, Samples 29 and 30 yielded moderately anomalous gold-in-till results of
23 and 35 grains respectively in an area underlain primarily by mafic volcanics with minor felsic
volcanic rocks. Although Sample 29 yielded fewer gold grains than Sample 30 it contained a greater
proportion of modified and pristine gold grains (73 and 54 percent respectively). Sample 29 also
contained a greater proportion of felsic volcanic clasts suggesting that the gold grains are locally
derived.
4.4.4 Pony Lake Area
Along the north shore of Pony Lake Samples 35 and 36 yielded anomalous gold-in-till results. In
Sample 35, 18 of the 22 recovered gold grains are pristine suggesting a very local source. The
pristine gold component of Sample 36 is much weaker (9 of 23 grains). Local bedrock consists of
mixed felsic and mafic volcanics. No previous work has been reported in the area.
4.4.5 Boundary Lake Area
The sampling traverse over the two mafic units on the westem part of the property also yielded
positive results. Samples 48, 50 to 53 and 55 yielded 28 to 53 grains. Samples 48, 51, 52 and 55
also yielded a significant proportion (60 to 88 percent) of modified or pristine grains indicating local
derivation. Although the area is underlain primarily by mafic volcanics, numerous small felsic
volcanic bodies are mapped locally. The significance of the anomalies depends on whether they are
related to VMS-type mineralization in the felsic volcanics orto vein-type mineralization in the mafic
volcanics which would tend to give stronger but less important anomalies.
•
•
•
- 34-
4.5 Targets Areas Identified from -0.063 mm Analyses
Analysis of the -0.063 mm clay + silt fraction (Table 5) identified several areas of exploration
interest. Some of the anomalies (e.g. near Samples 5, 20 and 22) are associated with the known
Highway, Teddy Bear and Tower Zones (Baker, 2006) and Samples 6 (153 ppm eu) and 12 (416
ppm eu), along the western shore of Off Lake, are located near areas that have been previously
diamond drilled (Blackburn, 1976). However three new areas (Fig. 12) of exploration interest
outside those areas with known mineral showings have been identified: (1) southwest of Spring
Lake; (2) west of the southern extent of Off Lake near the southern boundary of the property; and
(3) north of Potts Lake.
4.5.1 Spring Lake Area
Sample 03 collected southwest of Spring Lake yielded anomalous assays for eu (149 ppm), Zn (153
ppm) and Mn (1740 ppm) as compared to other samples on the property. The anomalous till is
underlain by mixed felsic and mafic volcanic rocks.
4.5.2 Ojf Lake West Area
Sample 43 was collected from till overlying a small mafic volcanic body in an area dominated by
felsic volcanics. The sample returned a weakly anomalous eu assay of 1 14 ppm.
4.5.3 Potts Lake Area
Sample 46 collected north of Potts Lake, approximately 500 m east of th(: western-most extent of
the Off Lake property over the main mafic unit on the property, returned a weakly anomalous eu
assay of 123 ppm.
•
•
•
- 35
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The focus ofRRR's sampling program on the Off Lake Property was to test areas with suitable till
development for: (1) Au-rich VMS mineralization within the c;:astem felsic units; and (2) vein-type
lode gold mineralization within the western mafic units. The program demonstrated that it is
possible to obtain high-quality subglacial till samples across the property despite the abundance of
outcrop and to employ glacially dispersed gold grains and till geochemistry to identify those areas
having the highest mineralization potentiaL Five areas prospective for Au-rich VMS mineralization
and three with anomalous eu were identified. Six of these targets are of particular interest. In
order of priority, they are:
1) The set of anomalous samples (Nos. 04, 06, 07,34 and 44) immediately west of Off Lake
which contain the strongest and most significant gold-in-till anomaly on the property. The
anomalous population of modified and pristine gold grains in several widely dispersed
samples and the large component of felsic volcanic clasts in the till suggests several proximal
mineralized occurrences in a felsic volcanic host. The 53-grain gold-in-till anomaly in
Sample 07 should be confirmed by duplicating the sample within 3 m of the original site.
Assuming confirmation, detailed till sampling should be perfoffiled up-ice of the current
sample sites to trace the anomalies to source using the sampling pattern shown in Figure 13.
This sampling protocol is also applicable, to varying degrees, to the other anomalies.
Acquiring access to the parcel ofland on which Samples 04 and 44 were collected would be
very beneficial.
2) The Burditt Lake gold-in-till anomalies, where follow-up till sampling is recommended
to trace the anomalies to source. The narrow belt of felsic volcanics that underlie the sample
site ends abruptly just outside of the northeastern boundary of the property, therefore
collecting six samples up-ice from Sample 23 to the property boundary is required. The
adjoining property to the north was recently staked by Western Warrior Resources Inc.
•
- 36 -
LEGEND 53 .. Ph~ s~ I s3mple site FL06-07
FL06-07 with 53 \ isible gold grains
• Pn'pos"d Phase II sample s it~
* Mineral occurrellCe
0 Gol<1 gra in dcfl\,.,d tlrgd
RRR daim bouncL.'uy
Other claim boundar\'
Roads trails
Powcriinc
(J o ~5 0:'
ktlometres
Scale = 1.15.000
Figure 13 - Proposed Phase II sample sites for the Phase I gold-in,-till anomalous area along the western shore of Off Lake.
•
•
•
- 37 -
3) The Cu-Zn-Mn anomaly in Sample 03, which should be investigated by prospecting and
the collection of two or three till samples up-ice from the current sample site toward Spring
Lake. Sample 03 also yielded 14 gold grains, above the background level of 1 to 10 grains,
but below the threshold of> 20 grains used to define the other targets. Together, these results
present a notable signature of Au-rich VMS mineralization.
4} Southwest of Cedar Lake, where the moderately anomalous gold-in-till results in Samples
29 and 30 with significant contributions from pristine and modified grains should be
investigated by conducting two sampling traverses, with 300 x 300 m sample spacing, up-ice
toward Cedar Lake. Barren Samples 32 and 28 give apparent east and west cutoffs to the
dispersal train. The sampling should be biased towards the felsic volcanics mapped in the
af(~a given the significant percentage of pristine gold grains and felsic volcanic clasts in
Sample 29.
5) The area north of Pony Lake, where further investigation is warranted given the high
proportion of pristine gold grains in Samples 35 and 36. Eight till samples should be
collected up-ice from these sites to test overall fertility in the area and attempt to trace the
anomalies to source.
6) The area northwest and north of Boundary Lake where the gold-in-till anomalies from
Samples 48 to 53 should be investigated by follow-up till sampJing and prospecting. The
anomalies may be related to vein-type mineralization within the mafic volcanics, similar to
the Dillman Showings to the northwest. Alternatively, they may bt~ related to Au-rich VMS
mineralization within the numerous, small felsic volcanic lenses mapped in the area. West
and east dispersal train cutoffs are evident from negative gold grain results in Samples 47 and
54. Conducting four east to west traverses with eight samples 300 m spaced samples per
traverse is recommended up-ice toward the northern limit of Bremner Creek.
•
•
•
- 38 -
The goal of the follow-up till sampling program is to further delineate the anomalies obtained during
the first program and to bring one or more targets to the drill-ready stage. The recommendations
given should be used together with those in a forthcoming report by Dr. L.O. Ayres who was
commissioned by RRR to study centres offelsic volcanism and VMS mineralization on the property.
His recommendations will be very useful in further prioritizing the target areas.
As mentioned Samples 04 and 44 were accidentally taken off of the Off Lake property. The mineral
rights holder should be notified and forwarded all data for the two samples.
* * * * * * * * *
•
•
•
- 39 -
6. Certificate
I, David J. Hozjan, residing at 10 Stable Way, Kanata, Ontario, Canada hereby certify as follows:
That I graduated from the University of Toronto with a B.Sc. (Hons.) in Geology in 1996 and the
University of Calgary with a M.Sc. in Geology specializing in Metamorphic Petrology in 1999;
That I am a geologist employed for 6 years by Overburden Drilling Management Limited, 107-15
Capella Court, Nepean, Ontario, an independent geological consulting company;
That [ am a Member of the Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario;
That this technical report is based on data gathered on the subject properly by myself;
That I personally interpreted the data;
That I hold no interest, either directly or indirectly, in Rainy River Resources Ltd.
Dated at Ottawa, Ontario this 31 s\ day of January, 2007
•
•
•
Appendix A
Sample Pit Logs
• OVERBURDEN DRILLINIIANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
• PROJECT: Ot~ LAkE SAMPLE NO.: COLLECTED BY: ~()"l.'3YIr-.l DATE.' :::J,')';j 24./0<..
------~~~---------
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE M ATERIAC-----·-"- I
P'C\i...' -hH NTS map no_ 52 C /1> Topography lJ ..... du ~r:; ~'''' ' 1.IIIcl..-O~ :!i\l !.e~ Classification s"'\8 ) ~- k';"j Q(lA~;""""'\ \;...tl/)"\: k·S S"~\£ 7
Geology map no. ~lS 'J.~'D~ Structure ~">"\y'"
_ _ ~~4~ Airphoto no '\S u..'3'2>\c. \i-:ts
~-- . ------- ---- , - ---------Surficial matenal --2!..j'~':<~~L~c.J.._l:hlLf-__ -- .-. . ... -. -- ~----------.--
I UTM co-ord l-lAoy>'1 0"\ 31- M (q E k\~.kY-.S _____ _____ _ ___ ______ I -
I (zone IS ) 5,-\1 '6'-tS B N Clasts -- ---Ice distance to Size range --- .. \'(,"'-'- - -
i outcrop 1() M S Section/Sample Interval i i % of sample ___ .3
Outcrop geology ~\~~<. vC>\CII.";(" a metres - -'- - () - o . \ ShOpe ___ >_\J_~ /"-/'-. ~C~o..A,c.s -- .
J . . - 0.\-0." s~\'" j'"G: ... l Shovel pit /' "- 1\\\ : Lithology ~o ]0 '1'-' ~~€. s ..... J') r
~ - r ('. Vcz\<~l'l" tOlo ~"-f\ , 0
IV-NL l'!:Nv.k,l c"--!,ts Mit,T\'
Road cut ~ . I
"I\. .J)
0
r-..~ .J o· ,,- 0.'\ S"''''S''<';'') ~l i I, Matri x
i \J.. ; Other exposure % of sample __ __ ____ J_ ! 1 metre \v\!> ~ ,,\... .. h I
v'/, I Est 08 thickness \.0 "" I--- Colour
~ I-- 0·'1. -\.0 ~"""'~\., \v\b~ ! !5 1--
"~~J Jt~..w .\Cl~< Additional notes ~o..M~~ ~', \.L Q.\~ &\~~~ I-- Grain size class .~_.1~
~,,\\ -
\JO\cA";'''> r "":]"'1" --\\-,J. j..r~l> - off of e¢"''''' ,- .-~---_ .. _-
-\.r ~~ / ~!!!r.C sc..e-~\a ~~ ~o -<kl,o.t.:. ?
i- t.o
2 metres I--
'--. --" '--' --~' - --- "'-------' ------"-" - '-- -'- ' - _ .-.
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no
UTM co-ord. NAnn (zone \S )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
~D,,-,~--,-t---lC.L-"-,-A-,-,-)(=-~ _____ SAMPLE NO. : COLLECTED BY: ~ C2;:S At-J
LOCATION
~~!'"'-l-~n E
S~ \ ~~o N
\ 10 ""
.4.\~ ·L Vtl \c,.:. 1,0,\ '-
Topography
1oe.J., o<l=-
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Surficial material ~~.!:.c,.;J\""\~\ ~\l . w& ____ ~_
SrtA\k,,(.!. -,~~i S,,"'- \L~,-,"".J.,.~t""y-v-j;-,-__ IIO~(A."it \-o,..~d...s ._.~ __ ._.
Section/Sample Interval
o metres
1 metre
SAMPLE MATERIAL
Classification
Structure
~S~y'-\i!i~~1:)(d' ..... ~~'---______ • _____ ._. __ •
Cias! s.
Size range
% of sample ___ bQ.~ ______ . __ .. . .
Shape
Lithology __ .M£ __ ·H~ic, "_VS>..~~-""\<!>f
2.0 7., h~k vo\c",,,,,ts, \0 .1~~~!l.. .. _.
Matrix
% of sample ______ '-I..l.!I.."'-.) ....'..'=O ______ .. _._ .. .. . ~ . _.
Est. OB thickness ___ .:....t·,::::s,..r:.r=---_____ _ b . "-\- o.g s..h0'",r'-",,' ~1\ '.
0~ I,i\~ +0 .JJ 1
\J.~ -+ d .. sh Additional notes
2 metres f--
L-_________________ ......I-__________ _________ -'--______ . _ __ ___ __ -.---.... - - .-- - ... .. .. .
• PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
OVERBURDEN DRILLlNIiANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
o'fr- LI\'K~ SAMPLE NO.: -------~~----------
COLLE C TED B Y:_..:..:..\\.>:..t> "2J--"-'-I.e.L.:-'N"---__
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Topography Classification
Structure
•
Surficial material 0r:r-""~!l1 l::l¢y\~ .. s I 5vr~\..qi..\ _____________________ _ UTM co-ord. NI\1)8) __ --=-O'-\....::3~'e,"_S;.<...LnJ..--____ __=E=__ -'-=h....".~l.L\ ___ __________________ _
(zone \S) S'-\\ '65.3'2.- N
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure -/ Est. OB thickness ___ 7_2_,~o /""'~ _______ _
Additional notes
s\ts. sA jv ... i~
Section/Sample Interval
o metres
1 metre
2 metres
/\. /\ t"o
Vr-0.1-61-
• l-
I) • t"-
, .-6-. -
16 " ~
6 . I-lI/t.I\
0.rh~: . 6 ~ r.:/ 1.1-
--
o~ 0.\ ... ~~ ... "i<.)
o. \ - \.1. """ Co \. , _ J.> ~~ .. J '<-C .... \
~\'" OL\.-'~ I Sblj
\'1.-.'-~""" Sb\,8 .. ui....\
-\\l\ '. \\~I:..\ 0,,1.-1'<.-\-0
Iu,~<, I \,,\-.,
»+ c\ .. ~4--)
Clasts:
Size range
% of sample
Shape 5),.Ij."'j"\u r
lithology 8ojo M8;' ... "o~ .. \i~ 1'2..01",
(&\<"c \jo\CM"~' ~""1! "'!I;.~ ·\k;l \J """'-'''--------
Matrix:
% of sample
Colour ~\\o...., 0('\..1'<:. -k ~~<-.
Grain size class .\-~ ,CA-", ~ c.." ~ '5-.\+
L--______ _____________ ---'-_________________________ --L-________ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ___ _ _ _____ . _ _ _ " ... ,
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord. L.lAI>6~
(zone IS' )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geolog/
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est 08 thickness
Additional notes
~ C2...CQ~)\Jc~ t::
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEIVIENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
_...:::()..:...t.!...f-,L~A.!..:.KE~ _____ SAMPLE NO.: ~l- ob- 0'-\ COLLECTED BY: \\07...::) ~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
S2 c 11-3> Topography . \..""'I1Mj .In\\ , ,\ :1(.... ~~IP<l.- Classification $,'\'jw'i..\ -btl I
'!;,"'o\.~ - 1:2~ ~ ,,~~ "" ... \
232.S Structure c\ .... ~-\ (,"~f .... k~ , c \) "1, .. ,A ~~~Sll~ -
~ ~ ~:'I c... n-1~ - -------Surficial material ~tt~~ (>,1:) ~~9_&.".,~L_ --.--.----,- ------,- ...... - --~. -- -- .'._-
D\r~<6bq\ E --\-:\\ ~e~ __ h,.>2 ~ __ r ---"_._. ----
S,-\\-::r ~l.l\ N Cl2stc. --- _ :: --~ - ,
Size range ___ J.~b __ ::k_ . 8O' .~JY:' ... ...
t \) M- E-" ')~ Section/Sample Interval
% of sample _ __ .:=LQJ.~ _____ . . . 4\.,;<- vJcArA'( o metres
""-1\ .--- 0- o. \ 0'V0 ..... )G.~ Shape _ __ '} . .,,\_~.~v\c..r . ~ o,l\~\v...1 .. O.I-O.S;
s"r"',j\""'''' /j' .f> f-- Lithology --.3-~-~h.L'!.Q\u..,"'~~'T- -.' . f-- 11:1 \ 5""~'J 6' B
, '2.0 I" ~k.~.~ ~\c.lA."~'-:~ .. _~_ ... . _. _.
v/' 0
ot) ~ :r 0.5-1·\ s)"j\~\"'\ 0 Matrix'
6 : . ill '10 of sample ___ ~.9.i"! __ -. .. __ _ ':: '_ -.!)
1 metre .cJ 'O .
J
fU \01-
7 \·S fV\ Colour \\~~ o,,\..~e.. ~ .~~--. f--
f--
~I<' - 5 e\,J". ~ SIX, ~~w)~· ..... r- G;ain size class --.\L_~~_s.,,~l. _s.~).<..:\\.\ .. (\0 I f--
c,\6-';"" tYllIt :\\.. 514 .. & (oq,l. 1-- - ,t,,40.0 ... __ ..... ____ ._ .... __ ... _ .. _. _ .... 0 • ••
I J -f.-
2 metres f--
_ ._._-'----_ ._::_-----_._,- -._-..-.- - .. .. .- . _. - . . -
.
.
• OVERBURDEN DRILLINIIANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG •
PROJECT: __ O_B=-,---,L<...!~.ll'f:..::'C:'--_____ SA MPLE NO.: COLLECTED BY.' ~o~erJ
LOCATION
NTS map no. I
Geology map no
Airphoto no
UTM co-ord o.J"'~~"' ____ -lQ.L.'-\..l,;~:J,.:O"'-2.S~.S<(,,~ ___ ....:E=_
(zone \5) SL\\ 1>'bP7 2- N
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness ___ .0...;.[ ""-'-______ _
Additional notes .\-\\ . .l!~02.>I(" \,q .t,.v.... r .. ' ....
,ow"'" ~\.:...... I N- "i~, cl i%-ij 1,. .... ~\.Q..
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Topography
l;....,
Suriicia l material --5-='f!.k-~~-'-"-'---\,.\~'..~ __ _ \:.o..,\.i.t.,. _____ ._ _ .. _._ .. __ . __
- - ------------ ---------
Section/Sample Interval
o metres -,---r--o
1 metre
fl." r- 0- 0.( 6"'0"'1<.~ . f> r-b, r- o.t-o .l{ s 01(" .J \t.~ t '0
~ 1i\~ -6., S'''~j v,
D 0 0 \
D' -.J>
O. '\ - 0 '\ <;vSj \'-C.4. \ 0
,f.> .J u..
~\\ \ 0\';, "f I
I~ c-- c\c. ::A,:> f-
~ '-f-r-r--.-
2 metres -
~. --------------------------~-----------------------
SAMPLE MATERIAL
Classification \ ~\\. S..)~;J\s...u"'\ :n
Structure
5.J{'F' 41",-_________ _
- -_._------_._-----_._---
Clasts
Size range .. ____ ~_k....._'tR3.N':.
% of sample __ _ ._J>_O 12 ....... _ ....... .
Shape ___ 2b,0-":\.J.\ .... ( '-.,;
lithology 5 D 1 02 ~~~hru:'5.. __ ___ ..
Matrix
% of sample ___ ._~.1.~ ____ .. ___ .. ____ _
Colour 0'"] ~4 j< -\0 ~J -- . ". Grain size class _-.1...~.,~ ..... L . """'} .. Sl\.\ ~ c\ ... ,j
- -----~ --- .. -_. - - , ..
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: Df~ LA~~ SAMPLE NO.: ----~~~------------
~l-t>~- 000 COLLECTED BY: ~C>'2.3AN
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S'2.. C.k1 Topography ~"~1l1!1:bbJ ' "'UW1",.a~ \:.7 b ,.,,\1 Classification sv~t<=c\.o...\ -ht~ • j
d ",.~~l. Geology map no. 2.325 Structure r\c..$SI" .... r cOM~( • . d """-4..j ...
I
-h> ,,\ ... ~+ s...,~~C>(.\..~ Airphoto no. q~- ~~36 e. - O~-\~
Surficial material $11 ~[ .... 6\u"", \ :1,\1 ~~~ UTM co-ord. IJAD~> O~3~ %:. E s,~~~e .l \oo.1~A.:..· ~ (zone IS ) 51.\\b1.\SI.{ N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range o.~ .\- -q-oc_
outcrop 7\CO ~ Section/Sample Interval
% of sample So /e> Outcrop geology ~\~r.. ",,'", ... ic- o metres
0" -() - o. g ,",, '. S' .,~{ "'- Shape S~\,~'" ;r\c..r
" - j~~'<"'\ -f.\1 :r11"'->-
Shovel pit :0 . - ( Lithology J<,? 1b 4-b', !lb\U. .... l·~S .
- O&l(. ( sc.. ... ~) I
0 - ZS 7z, 0("-"";k;~ $ 70 p.:te\<:"
V • Road cut o· • -
0 - O.S-I. b",,: Matrix: . i) -So 70 Other exposure
1 metre c - S'v\, 0\c.clt..J tH · % of sample ' --•
Est. 08 thickness 75"" 0'0
~ ...9 Colour 0~-~6e Jp (is') . b' D ()
• Additional notes S<.'+- si.\.. \~ vt6\ ()~ 5\~ DS ~
,j) Grain size class :£~ ~""!:l.1 c..-l s;\~ ~. D
~ .:...
~'" /1l-. au"lIc-kl ~I(.(" i ~\....\-> -h~",. o~ ... ~ op ~
I
-2 metres -
I i
-~- - --~ .... -•.. - ......
• PROJECT
NTS map no.
Geology map no .
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord .
(zone JJ~~ ' LS ) , Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness
Additional notes
~~",.l.·s k,...l >
• • OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
_ _ O-=-tt'----'=Lo.-CA..!..:¥-=t:O=-· _____ SAMPLE NO.: tl-Db- bO~ COLLECTED BY. \\O'2\)I't.r-J OA TE. -::r v(:) 2Sjo ~ - ~- .. - - -
LOCATION
5'1 c tl2 1'?>25
~5-~~~o C - 0& ' l ra 0
OY.~1"~1- E - - -5~lbS\S N
ioo vv- 'vJ
~\:2'( VO~c,,-":,<-
./
s\~· ~~ "\6~ ~ -~,~ d I
S I'" ,:" 1"""
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
Topography 1J1!!~~\c...~ .. :) h"~~.cl;l ) I
~It..\~l..
Classification
Structure ~"''j C04"'c.\ , ~\-i 1'--
c.\"'S1- s.v,?,?.:>(~l ___ _
Surfici2/ material ----->_II~"'" o'c.cl· ... ' ~\\ AJ!'
~~_\_.l~\kl~ .... _ _ ____ ._ .. _ L_,. --- - --_.,_.---
ClA sts .- -------~--. _.,----Size range _ _ J~~_ ... ~_~o.c. t.'::_ ..
Section/Sample Interval
% of sample __ , ___ ._,,_C>~ ______ ._._ .' o metres
6-- 0- o.~ <;" r----- r"'5~;"\ Shape
./J r--" -60
~ ·D D', . D -
1 metre e:. r-
f-r-t-----
r----r-f-
2 metres f-
~ j, CJ --'
\..I-
-\-\\ ; ~ .. ~~ ~~-O<-\.,
(').'3>- b.g"....
~ b\1,,S.
< \3,-\..0"'--(
.-t\ \\ ' /
\JC,.V', Matrix'
% of sample
Colour
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: DFf L Pt~f: SAMPLE NO.: -----=~=----------
COLLECTED BY: \\1;)"'Z.JPtN DA TE: ":!'-'\~.2.S 10 to
LOCATION
NTS map no.
Geology map no. 2.~2S
Airphoto no.
U T M co-ord /JAllSJ ____ ....,O,,-~ ..... ><_>o~~!,'_"\ S=----_____ E_
(zone IS'") $41+ $110 N
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
------------------------------Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness \.5 fV' ------~--------
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Topography
Suriicial material _~~~~~l. I.;o,,~
(~'- c~L~i9t) .------.---.---- --- --- ----------- ---------
Section/Sample Interval
o metres
1 metre
2 metres
-'-
'-
r-f--1--1-f--1-
0_0.1...... $"'~r"'j\c....;;"-~
it1\ ( :JlI ...... -<)c~tC.
~O'.,u.¢ .. J 1 'C-\... .. I\~
o.~-c.'i. ,...., J"'\'~\"'c: ... \
~\\
SAMPLE MATERIAL
Classification
Structure
-------"'5""'i~ffri> ..... f..:;l:¥::::.::.~----------------
-------_._-----------_._- -._-
Clasts .
Size range
% of sample
Shape
____ ~~_. :k_ .. '::\Q _c.~
.---- ~"'2Cv,.':J.;,~c . ..... -
Lithology --~.~AI..~--~",.:\-~ .~ . , .. . Lit> 7<> '<\~,'- ""\co.",'" .. ____ ._. __ ... __ . n __ _
Matrix 'Yo of sample ____ ~9 ___ .. _ .. __ ._._ .. .. . -
Colour
Grain size class . __ lla~ __ 5c,..~L'-"ts\\L ..... . :):.. c1t..... . ___ _ ._ n ._ ._ . __ _ ... . · .
d
L--________________ ____________ -'-_____________________ . ____ ... __ __ --.--- __ ..... ... __ ._. _ __ ._ . . _ •. _. _ . _ .. . .. .... . -
)
• PROJECT:
OVERBURDEN DRILLINclANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
~f-t=- lJ:\~-=-t-~ _____ SA/~.1PLE NO.: l\.-o~- ooq COLLECTED BY: \\() ~;;:$'Pthl
• DA TE: -:Su\ ~ 2-S J D ("
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no, 51 c I \'!.> Topography 1J"'~"~b~"~ ~\\ ~l>(-tv& ItIcl\ Classification 5\J~J\(,'''<'''\ s ... ....l:j -b\l I
d(~\~
Geology map no, 2315 Structure tA2k~ '''~t..A J
c.~t..:'± ~ ~J.,i~ ~V~l!IU Airphoto no. qs - ~~~QQ, - o~ - ~8:z..
Surficial material ~~t;: ~~~t:!~~" +o;~ UTM co-{)rd, f'l~Da) ~~2..\"I.'t1 E G.\""1 ~ \.~ i!. \I ~'::.t· ~>. I
(zone IS ) Sj\~ QS3: N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range o. S c. c-= -+0 ~o c ...... . 'f:!M L :1c~ outcrop Section/Sample Interval
, % of sample "1-0 JO
Outcrop geology -,- ~\~ o metres
°A - 0- c·s JV\'. t;"~""'jw.'\1..\ Shape Soj,\,~"'~~ ~ CAII\;jW - ~\\ ) 'J\\"\.> -.c.\.l-l...
Shovel pit J />-. r- Lithology 1-0 10 ~.;,'~ ~ I ]2 QN~
o P ~ ~\..""''"ld-..
Road cut .6~
~ <r'
~"\jo.i\"'\ .'D 8 O.::S -\.\>,.. , Matrix ..J)
-1;. \\ I 5(1,."J~ 1,-0 j,o Other exposure 6° '" % of sample -'
1 metre T (..10..
Est. OB thickness 721"\ r-r-
Colour \\~\\ op'w<. ~ k.''i! r-
Additional notes <;,,~~ ~d:~: 0\'2.. - Grain size class tIC!, '2!!> ... ~ ,.~ ~ ~l \~ DI~~ -\,.M"~ ?,w€l \i,,<. ~ - ,
'--,.
f-
2 metres r-
- .-~--- .
I I
OVERBURDEN DRILLING rtllANAGEIVIENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ D~_~,--L ___ Bu.)l.,-,-~ .... ______ SAMPLE NO.: 'tl-Ob - 0 10 COLLECTED BY.· ~~;s'AtJ
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE M ATERIAL
NTS map no. $1- c.l \~ Topography ~)!Oo~"~""h~ ~I!~"''''I:~ :hl~ Classification S~\'j\.. ~,.\\... ~'lo. =b:1a~ 1 !::l4~[I"k QL~ h (~~ i ~~~ .. t~
Geology map no. 2~2.S c\.r",~~ Structure ""~
c.j,,\ =h\\
Airphoto no q S'-S.1W2/~1
l.[S!,o~ - D~-\~'2.-
Surficial material ---5~~.s\'c.: .. \ -h\\ / ~4d·,~ ___ - - --_. UTM co-ord . NA!>B-:> O~'-I. 0 -:r '\ () E ~\~fS
-.---~.-'---
(zone IS" ) 51.\.\ :t~'2.~ N Clasts - _ ..
Ice distance to Size range --j~--outcrop SM E .. ~\- Section/Sample Inlerval
% of sample ----.~Q. Outcrop geology ~~'k ~P\C&i~~L. o metres
-~- -
O-t>·'2-: $ "f'" ~~o. .... \ Shape ._.-.5.v~_.&.. ~~ f--. . r- ~'\\ Shovel pit / 6
"i' I {S- \.....,\~'" }
Lithology 0
~ ~ -
~ g c \,o"\~.J I
'" Road cut t:> 7 () ..J . ~ O.2.-();r : 6° ..... Matrix r-
Other exposure 1 metre - 5-,\,j \..(.~" \ ~\\ % of sample
"
'j~"-!-- . ... .. -- _ .... .
~~~ __ Lt:0~._. . .. .. _.
o i2-_ _____ . _____ .
Est. 08 thickness 7\.01\1' - Colour "m f-- 'sc.- -----·--··--... ..... -. f--
Additional notes ~~~~ :2\~ 0" ~-+"'~l~ I-- Grain size class ___ ~ . f--
~\o~g, kt",,'&' ~. 'Ie I,r\( f~
~._~~,,).~.5,\\ __ . - ... ----- .. -.-- ..... - .-- ....
1-' r-
2 metres t-
. -- ,-.--- .... - .. __ . ----.-~---_._------_._-_ .. _._ .. _ .
• OVERBURDEN DRILLINIIANAGEMENT liMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
• PROJECT: __ Df.:....;~'--"l ...... A.!.l.'6=E ____ __ SAMPLE NO.: ~\..-6b -0\\ COLLECTED BY: ~t)'2.::sp,N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 5). cl \"~ Topography ""'~1I \...b~~ ,",,, ~~ Il""~ 6arl.[Q<.\:. Classification 5" \, j\gc;Co-\ ~ \\ I I I
t""'\.s I ,.,1\ dr .. '.;. .. .!. --Geology map no 21>2S Structure CQ~.\ fN.,~S\\."l ~~ , I
~ c\..~ S \01 Pfill !s: 1-Airphoto no. qs - '-\&~ C- r+ -'1-1- ------------ ----
Surficial matenal ~_.5'yfil'¥~ \'<>..l\~l~ --.- ---~-- -~------.---- .--- ~
UTM co-ord. ,J"1l~) Ol(l{Cl.{b1- E -' I -_. (zone _ IS' ) $lj \ ?,'{1.. & N CI~sts --- --- ---Ice distance to Size range _ __ Q.,S~~ __ ~Qc...-,.. . . .. - ._- . -
outcrop SM Section/Sample Interval
% of sample _ __ i~h _________ , ... - -
Outcrop geology r\l~±V t\lIiL ,,~\ Ct..lllis, o metres 0 o~ co:,,,,, '. '5 .. f' .. jl .... , .. \ Shape __ s.v\"~~.L~L_., .. _. _ ... bo _.-. . . . . . . f- -tIl I ,:).\1""" - 0 ... \..,<-
,/ f) Shovel pit () .
~ I,,~ .. \ J<~1 Lithology _ ~'.JlO1.~.~i~_ ti.~_~r.~~,:t;J .
80 - o. ;'-0.'..,: )Jb
J,,-.,,41
0 ---~-- .. --- -- - -
Road cut I
~!J ~ -\\tl f ~'y. +cj"S 0 I Matrix ... ~
Other exposure t>D u.- ~'~e % of sample (.,0 Iv 1 metre -~--- '--'-' - - " - , ., .. .. .
Est. OB thickness SM- -- Colour ~.1>--o~~~---- ... ... -
-Additional notes nJf.'.' 5',k IS: \~!!rr. \01..1
f--- Grain size class --~~-J_\'~_5r.-lo_)._.J.."'~~' \\ . I f-Q."t CIA ke~ () "\-""~f, , ,... \0 "" Y;f,! at t-- j: e\~ _._--- - "_ .. _-- - --_ .. -- _ .. "
'1.-f'f2 ~S!~b 1-~
2 metres r--
-_ .-. __ ._--_.-.... _ ._-._ ,--_._ . .• - -._--_ .. _- .. -
I J
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ ()-'-F..:...F----""'LA"-'-"'=~=____ ____ SAMPLE NO.: ~\.-Cb- 01"2.. COLLECTED BY: ~\)"2;,}ptN DATE: ~v\'J 2S /bb
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. SJ. ctl72 Topography ~",~~~!:<-\t~ "'U~l::l.!!t~J -Kill Classification 'S0y",,"',,- \ :h\~
l.o:l.\\ dr.:.\~A Geology map no. n2S Structure ~ ... ~s! ~~ I co ~~~ I c\c..~j;
SIZ~a\lk~ Airphoto no. t\S- l{~:!'1 C - n- =t(.,
Surficial material S"~C"';5\~Ii..\ iU . OCC,,'\~\ )
UTM co-ord. O'-\~'" "b~ E ~~~"-\-o; i 1ool!\~5 (zone ) S,-\\ 8~'bS N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range o·:s -2o ct::::
outcrop Section/Sample Interval % of sample -:tD io
Outcrop geology N\A o metres 0 - 6 - o. f, .... '. 'j"r'"j\"':·\ Shape 5"\'<""'6"\.:0..,
I) -
Shovel pit t>t:J - ~ It \ l,ov\~"J Lithology ~Djo ~(,,~(. ~tljg ~ .. :~;, ~
- f
"6 - o. ~ - l·S ",,' 5 \, \ . l "o\:~"'\<. r \ Q}." :j\P.~" \o~.l.. Road cut J - . v 0"'~
':) " - 11\\ Matrix: Other exposure
1 metre .6 "f7 % of sample ~91Q
rJ ~ '0
~ -Est. OB thickness 72.0 M- 0 Colour J\\~-oc.\..\e " I
fJ ..!) [) '. ~ ..J
>liZ'", t"", 5f.,.~~ .. ~ s~+ Additional notes "'!'!.~ . "vi ~ NW ." & t:l' . V- Grain size class
of- oU L ... b, ~ ... ~, "IY"r.·!\c 0;; t. ... \:.a. j
' 0 I---~
2 metres '--
I I
I ---.~
)
OVERBURDEN DRILLlttPMANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG •
PROJECT: C)H' \.J~"E SAMPLE NO.: --~~-=~~----------
'fL-b'- - O\~ COLLECTED BY: \-\Cl~ DATE: -:S"'\'l "2.'=-/010 1 ..
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S2 C./I'l.> Topography {uye> IlV' ~ ... ~",,~~ \'e,hcxk. Classification <,0 'bdc...c:;c..\ -\\\\ i J l"oI..:z
)
Geology map no. 2~1~ Structure ~o~~cA I ~ ... ~~~.:,...
~\~~ ~~Qt~~ J
Airphoto no. ~ "~;,\ C. \":\-:1:3: Surficial material ')~u..'~~;w\ ~\~ o. ... l
UTM co-ord. NAD8} Q"l.400bl E ~.J,.J. a,,,) 0.:..,!",H... lv ..... ;-..J'U~~ ~\~I> (zone \5' ) 51.\\'"' 2.':!-5 N
0:; J Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range \ c."" ~ ~C> c~ outcrop 3/V'-o Section/Sample Interval
% of sample ~D(c> Outcrop geology ,'-'Asrv.. l!o\cr.~"" o metres Shape s..,\,"' ... j'" \a..c 1'60 o 'o . ~,.... " r-
if °D '- >"'?'''' 0''''''' l.J ~ i\ r \'" j< Shovel pit
~ Lithology ~o 70 M-A.£'" \l"\c"' ... ~ . I';:> r'I
'b:,,, \"k.> ~i '!YC ... ~ 1 7""~'I )
6· '0 ,,",0 7" 4\$,< \J 0 \'""'" (. .1 Road cut "A
0 ..J O. '3,- O,'1-M '. CI- Matrix: . '"
Other exposure ~ . - 5v\',+";"\ -\ill , 1'<0.( % of sample 4,0/0 1 metre -I3n
Est. 08 thickness 1,.,.. I--s',Hl
Colour ',g\~ I--I--
Additional notes ~"( s·\.k O~1 I I.!I\~'" ~~ ... I-- Grain size class ~w. S", .. ~ ~ .. ~ s~~ \\~ '.I..J'\'v 1x-~,- -h.wo o .. ±~\o~\
I--, ... I--
I--
I--
2 metres r-
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _-"'\,)..:....fF-'------'\."-'-A.:..:..~=& ______ SAMPLE NO.: "tl-Db ~ 0\'1 COLLECTED BY: 'Ht>'l.;JY,N DATE: :s,,\" 2" {oS t I
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S2. eLI}. Topography ~ .. ~J...\.... IllCi:~'-'~!1":\""'J :1',\\ ~ \e..l., Classification Sv\'~\'''-\ -\i.\~
~~\ ~[~~,l J
Geology map no. 11225 Structure J'A.<,...~~I~ \ ~:>..k.....l..~ C~~~
~~,t, h ,,~~ ~F{kl Airphoto no. I\S 'I.~;,\c... \1-11
Surficial material C;;" ~I(> dloL\'--~ ~\\ e!ol UTM co-ord. N"D'6) ol.l.L\o ~ '11- E \,o)/U",,~ (zone \S" ) s\'\'iq~:I~ N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range \ - 20 ~~ outcrop 7']..co,.., Section/Sample Interval
% of sample So to Outcrop geology N\8 o metres Shape s"\" ... ,,,~,\"r bO 0- 0.'2.. ...... '. 51"".jk..:.\ -Shovel pit -/ oD
~ :T
1\tl - ~",\d..~J\ ~ ... J.., Lithology (f ........ ~\·~ u. ... ~ Ms--:nt.. ... "0
.D. .. 0.2-0:1- M: '$u':...j\toe,;"'1 'VI> \u.."'~1.. ..D
Road cut '6 D ~
~ " ()- -\i.\\J 'l"\~ Matrix:
Other exposure !}tJ - % of sample 5\)/0 1 metre -
Est. OB thickness 72M - Colour Je~-~l& r-'--
Additional notes S~""Q~ ~ftk ~!2 Nf..~ 1: - Grain size class ~l!j ~~ 2"'V'~ c.-",~
k~ij~l~ ~ C,\t>JWl!..\.c.. \. ... u. ~,,-.l r-
7\\\ I
NE '--
-r-
2 metres I--
I
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no,
UTM co-ord . ~>I\)'1
(zone \$' )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness
Additional notes
OVERBURDEN DRILLI'MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG •
__ ()::....f:.....!F--=L;:....:A..:..:.~E=---____ SAMPLE NO.: ,\
COLLE C TED B Y.'_ ---l.-Ct\,-=O-=L.'Se'""-!:l..:N~· __ DATE:
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
$2 ell'> Topography (1l1-t:l ~~rt~ ~St~S Classification s~ \, -:j&.{,~"= \ -\,\~ ~
2~lS Structure ~~~!..\ I ~,,~S\~ f ......... \"'.l!:, k c.\c.·"\ ~\]~f'r k ~
'\5 ~ '6 ~~ c.. \"r-'1-t- _ . Surficial material .f.,,~\, ~M"'" 13.b2 ~~6~
D4l\ \I:>-=t"l E S\.l~.4- 8~-~~~ \ .. \;.1~ i Q""";,;",,,,~ ~"'cl~~~\~ :'!.I\'~~~ S~\~lI:.Y N !go,,\'\": ~ ,;." pH", Clasts: ,
Size range \ ~ \ 0 c.t::
5~ Section/Sample interval
% of sample ~()1o
k.~(. v,> \c!lo'" 'I.. o metres Shape S )\o'A"ju\A.[ 1\ b o - 0.'2 ..... Ov~";<-I
0"- ;-
J tJ 0
~ ~
± '5",?r"SK,J 'H -Lithology ~o,,":' k;\ ~h<',- Vf>\cr.t:.'<" .
• 0 l) 1)-\"''''''-{"", I , ,
~.1. l.lQ\'.::a.14!:r-[) ..0 0 b.l-o.-:t,., su\~\...c~ ... \ '" ,.J _. DQ u-
.-nt\ ~. Matrix:
6 i- t ' ... ,,)~?(~ % of sample b () ~" i-; metre
1M I-- Colour ~~-~'6"-I--I--
"'-.of I-- Grain size class S!!o .. ~ ~~~ <;\~ ~ , ~ .\ q,~ 1 !~fJ ~...:... C''''~ U eM. &\....\ c..\e<... €' at \\"->1 6\S
I-- f,\:\ I--f--I--
2 metres I--
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ ()..::...Ff-~--,L=:..:.P,..:..!.'f(..=~ _____ SAMPLE NO.: I=L-o,,"- 016 COLLECTED BY: \\t."1-~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S2 Cb2 Topography Il~ ~v~~ h"j ! b>llo!d~.t'¥:11 L..e~\ Classification su\'o~\ ... \ ~\~
dr"l.....R ~ Geology map no. 2~'2.S Structure c.S!~t>L~ \ ~,"~~II& I ~1;1
~ ;~~O£:\e~ Airphoto no.
Surficial material s~r~i~~;~~ 11.~ I I:>'~~~~ UTM co-ord. Nfl\) 'C1 0'-\4\ 0\ 10 E ~.h"-\\1 '.!~Il!:f~~ 'L ~
(zone \S ) 5~?.. 00"-2 N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range \ l,.., \o<>~ outcrop Section/Sample Interval
% of sample ~o :Jo Outcrop geology NIA o metres
Co 0- 0.3. .... : S"'~y""~~t\,;.. \ Shape Sv\'c...I'~\o.r D· r-
J D I-- -hl\ (o,)~ ~ \.o..:.\h...} Shovel pit \ Lithology ~,,"\,k~i o..-~ ""~;I .
~ ~ c... .. ~ sc... ... ~ DO is "Y,,\c ... '-'.;{. \
c!J ..J)
s"'\'O'=.i..\ Road cut 9 o·~-o . .,. M. : -'
D· ~
-\\\, Matrix:
Other exposure j) I-- % of sample --:}"t) "lo 1 metre r-
Est. 08 thickness r- Colour JJ-~ \... ~~ t-- 0 r-
Additional notes ~ .. ( ~,~ 1.\5 \:.... \",~~ r- Grain size class ~l!!~J ~~ 5t...l ....,~ .:;,\.\. - ",,,,,L ~~g". - b" --
2 metres -
)
PROJECT:
OVERBURDEN DRILLI"MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
_.......;O:....:.~...!..~_L~A....:.;"--'-G"'-_____ SAMPLE NO.: ~L- \)~ - C\""1- COLLECTED BY.~~~..!...:N-=--__
• LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 51. ell', Topography Q~~III!>'\'\oj bll.c~ Il~~j :hn I Classification ~v\~\a.c\c...\ -+.\\
)
l .. ,,~~ ~(!!:I~~i Geology map no. ~~l.S Structure () t::l~D..('! , ~ ... ~~I~ ~+"1:: ~
'"'\~~~ ~Q!k)' 1
Airphoto no. '15- '-\~~l c., 13-~1-Surficial material 5lo!~[~~!cI{..~ ~r ~~>J,.o. ~
UTM co-ord NAll~:, O~~ \ ~,\,~ E ~!J""~~.) (zone 15 ) S~:p .... O!,~~ N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range \ ~ lo'e outcrop I \.) ~ 'wJ Section/Sample InteNal
% of sample ~Q j" Outcrop geology -k\!:Il<' \lO\cM·!:!o.
o metres 0- c ."2... ... ' • .J->r" 0~~'- \ Shape "'!\'4"'~V\/>O r c:>
Db -
Shovel pit ~/ of)
~ ~
~\\ • ~\\o.:> -t;(.\..Ie. Lithology fj ..... \ ·Ir .. ;, ~ r...o.\ kbi' ~11~""\L 0
~ J, • ~ , 1.-o"t .... " . SJ~j~c.: .. \ Road cut D./) 0 .;, u.. ~I.\ Matrix:
Other exposure b - % of sample bOt¢ 1 metre r--
Est. OB thickness ).S M f- Colour ~\& ¥ ~~'3\y.& I--
f-
Additional notes W 51~ .~ 12~~ ~ f- Grain size class ~vu. ~~ Scb .. ~ IA. .. ~ s,~~ ~ w\'~\'" ~,,~ \e9\11J...
I-- j i
!\J.A( .;,.\.+ 4'; f-I--
I--
2 metres f-
I
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _O::;..;F:......:~'---=l:.:..lIZ\:.:..;~=E _____ SAMPLE NO.: 't-\.-Cb- c>\ca COLLECTED BY; ~t;)~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. S1. ch~ Topography ~"o'r~ 10',\ \ +Of Classification I I
6...~<IH.~ to! S':lft..~ Geology map no. 1.Y1S' Structure
Airphoto no. ' ~C;; -~<6:!l\c. ~~-:B: S:11~~:..l~ ~
Surficial material bu.l 501/'''jk.<,,;..\ ~\\ oc.c <0"\ rm:.cA , UTM co-ord . tJ"'1)~" o4.~() ":\-'\ L... E ~~",!:s ok ~lo:\cL., ~ (zone \S ) S~ '2.. \1~S1 N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range
outcrop Section/Sample Interval
% of sample
Outcrop geology o metres Shape
4° 0-l "" '. '$,,~ rc..6 "'" i.. \ I-
C>!:J -~\\ J \",rJt: b."u...r~ Shovel pit - Lithology
• 0 - ~\ .. ..\ .. o..+. \Jb\g.",~ ~ V' ~ -
Road cut -6!:> - t-\,SM Su~\r.-:.\ Matrix:
0 -Other exposure 1:>0 - -!il\ % of sample 1 metre
" ~
Est. OB thickness 73M 0 0 Colour I
o .. if C:J
SAMPLE MATERIAL
'Sv\S'"'; .... t -h\\
~~~tl.(.\ I ~S~l.,c,.t C\(..~k
I S""!>~J 1511
~ -to loct:;:
c,t> j2
sul..,e.,···t:J'(,..(
es'''''';'' },o:. ~ c..~ 4~~
40 70
0~Uo.. - "c-~'e. jo ~":S'=e!!f ~ Additional notes to~.1. ~u± ~ tJ& ~,~ ~ ..'J Grain size class ::b!:S ~o.. ... ~ 4. .... ~ $; ~!: 0 ~
~s: :::.ik. 6~ --r--
2 metres I--
OVERBURDEN DRiLUI MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _-=O"':"~.L.f-,I....!< A:u'f.~t=,---_____ SAMPLE NO.: 'tl-t>b-b\q COLLECTED BY: \11>7.Sfr!>.l
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. S2- CL(~ Topography fl.,.! I~I"J . 1 t..>e\ \ JIA":'~ Classification •
6.~,""k S~l1.~16r~ Geology map no. 2325 Structure
~ c~~~ Airphoto no. "5 - ~~2l\(. P-1-"1-
Surficial material ::;;>o!~I" 6'<.Q" :h\\ L.:! ,-f\. UTM co-ord. (lil\o~n __ .. . D'1408.S~ E OC<:4:'\c;..J.. sk"(fl b,\) I.d..s . (zone \5: ) S~1.. D803: N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range outcrop SM 5 Section/Sample Interval
% of sample Outcrop geology ~~i~ 11 6 \cc.v.,s., a metres
Shape 6 6 O~O.'2. Ovjr.. ... \·c.~ r-
/ o ..
~ T ""j ~"r"d"c,;"\ .j.,1\ Shovel pit b 0
Lithology , . '" tJo 0 I o· ~- O. b ., .. "JI A£ ,'4 \ • 0 ....J
Road cut \,l-II -hl\
~ f- .lI Matrix: f- ~
Other exposure I- j % of sample
1 metre
I Est. OB thickness O. (, '" r- Colour l-I-
• SAMPLE MATERIAL
$"\' clo.c.v...\ 1'\\
~~I!~H\)c..1 C ~~,,,l! I ~Jw'':l:. ~~I~~
\ce::: .\0 ~Oc~
SQ J>2 .. -
S\!~4~\"[ -\-t. " ... b"\/),(
k\ .. {t, y~' (CAMS. o'lo? ~~~
50 10
~~~ ¥ ~~~~'t
Additional notes ~Q~( ~ik 5"1- t-J s;L. .f- I- Grain size class Il!:!:J t."", ::&lo.~ -. ~ St-, \~ , "-Q\l +.c.:, ( r-r-I-
--. 2 metres I--
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _-"O'-'-'f ...... f--t::,JLB='f=.c _____ SAMPLE NO.: ~l-ob- 01.0 COLLECTED BY: \\ ~"2~~
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 52. c../\} Topography ~M ).u\Ii.~"J ' !..ell dl'I!:lS'l Classification $"\,\)\..0"'" 1:;\~ I
Geology map no. 2.;'1.5 Structure Mk~~\1l4.. CI) t-i,,~:\ I
Airphoto no. '\S-\{B~\C. \3 -~1-d~~~ ~!o!~~!.\(.l
Surficial material ~!.l~[H6\~~~ ~~ g,,,~ UTM co-ord . ..:lP,n8~ D~~Q f25Q E ~~\.lD.r ~ (zone IS: ) 5'-\7.. Q5~o N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range ~ ~ ~()<.~ outcrop Section/Sample Interval
% of sample 1-0 jo Outcrop geology NIA o metres Shape N\r.0~r 0 o - o:"!>"': ' }1'~~"''''''\
D" r--Shovel pit Dr-- -\..\, ~-k,.\.;.", Lithology .c~.'\~i!. Vo\c"",,1..
" !) I D ~ ON
0 . /
..D (:) .:,- 0.1- 'j"\~'-C'''' \ Road cut .D. 0
t;.'"- ci: Matrix: -\\ \\ Other exposure - % of sample -;'0 ')"
1 metre r--
Est. 08 thickness 7\ .$rv.. - Colour ~Q!.:2 - oc.\.\~ --
Additional notes :O.Q !., ~i~ 5$: "IC! S,-> - Grain size class ~I .. ~~ :>o.",~
,,'..M S941.? ~'.'f..;lV'!.k\) So ... S-=-- j
<?\ h-,.." -~~,.o .. ,,,u, .. ~ ~~! -
-2 metres -
I
" ... } .,.~
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord.
(zone )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. OB thickness
Additional notes
lou no, N v!
OVERBURDEN DRILU.MANAGEMENT LIMiTED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG •
_....:.D ...... f....:..F-....:;:..L:...!.AI::=E=---____ SAMPLE NO.: FL-Cb- D1.\ COLLECTED BY: ~'2-~BN
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
5"1- c.}l:1 Topography ~o J.tv~~ !Il"'~"'-~'::)\ Classification 5Y~\c.,;.,c..\ ~~~ - :5M,}j
1..2t\\ d.1" I~.\: .....,,~[O,~ ~>.2~(12~ 1 2.~l5 Structure ~l!~!r;"~~ C'j;! ~~.!, M<o.. .. ~~
",\c..~ SIl~~>1J~~ I ll>~l! 25: Id."'T~~C 120""~ '\5 - '4.~~\c... \~~1 5./},c-."~!\""!. ~\:lII~ 1I.k!:,,,,''- "'-" ~1:3'~k"~
Surficial material S,)~!It~M:''- \ b\\ .. 1..iI~~ ",\~;:,\ ~
o"\~o4..~O E lilC~ 8~1 .. \lj S~\~~O~ .. "'" 1 ~',,\... L ~.,>.!~.h. ~ 'S\.{1. D~1''S N Clasts:
Size range c>·s -\0 ":3, 0 c.t::::::
Section/Sample Interval % of sample 1-0 i",
o metres Shape <; .. \'(!.{'~v\..r ~~,",\c>-c ,,0 /;:) - O-b.Z."", ·.
J Tt - s""{ .. 0 Ie..,"-\ ~l \ Lithology s:e-\~ 's., VO~!611~:'(.. ~a.. • 0 '1 £t .!:J. '+ J ~-k. .. n;'" ~<t"cd?\~ '.j. -J)
o .. 0
tl· fi J -'
.i;) ~ O.'2..-0.~ ...... ·. Matrix: r- s..'>S ... ~\~\ -h~ \ % of sample 30 '0 1 metre r-
I\'O~ -:5c.. .... .}~,
Colour 't)\J o ,,\...!:, ..It, ~,..-I.:a,.~ ;-- J r-
'N"., ~\~ S~ ,~2:1o~~~ r- Grain size class -h~ ~ 0. ... ~ s:\l~
b~! .-
(rIIM- r=s1·si ..... s-.....l. r- s·"'"'S r--r--
2 metres r--
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord .
(zone )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. OB thickness
Additional notes
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
_----'D=-F'--F~l=\IX_'_'¥-.;:E-'___ ___ SAMPLE NO.: ~L-Ob- D2..1... COLLECTED BY: \\'b'2.3'Ar-l
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
52 C-I\~ Topography IM~ \~~J ,bl.2~~<><'\.:~ , Classification S"\.~ ... ?~e..\ :.b:~~ I~\~ ~I~I""d,
2.)'l~ Structure (0"100<:\ , M45~I;& f
c\~~ !lloI~CI[~l '\5 - '1S~\L n -:t"t
Surficial material ~~16 ~'"o'-~ :hH "'~~ D~~D '\b 'S E \:x,.,J~~~ !, S~ 1. 01~Q N Clasts:
Size range \c.-N\ +t, ~o c. e,c"
II) "'" N Section/Sample Jntervai
% of sample 80Jg 4\~ .. < :¥o \<~ 6'5. o metres
Shape 5"\GIO::J"'~C .\.., ~~\l\o..£ 0 D - o. b,....·. S.~r" J\t.t, ... ' 0
0 -- -\\.\\ J ~\~, -rIC:\"" l~l .. • Lithology jO]"'k\~\L vo'k-q.",-lL
c!J - I - ~\\j~ .');\~ - ~,<J ""ck\.. VO~f(e,A\(. \0 '0 Sl<.. .... '~.,¢.
J . - I
!)
~ rJ
0 ~ O.b-I,o"" ' . 5,)~\.'J,) .. Matrix: f.;1J I
't % of sample 2oJ.o f.>~ ~ ~ -K\\ I c\l..~ - tl~\... 1 metre u... - Colour CSkS \<> t3<+:J- ':l,z;;r --
~\,.l) .t 2i~ 5'.> i,,"'l.. r- Grain size class ~~ £...:.e. ~c.-,. ~ ~~ ~i1± e--
cJ 'l\""~ ot Au t"? s O(L~ W'~ \\~ b\S '--\
~1A~.~'t.-h~ r-r--
2 metres '---
)
• • OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED • FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ D_~_-;:'---=l,-,-~,-,-)I.,.;..;'C,--___ _ SAMPLE NO.: J"-L- Clb -or~ COLLECTED BY: \\ O"L.3£t~
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S1. c../n> Topography {~Jj4~ t W'bS.\. ~v.;,\. ~ ClaSSification ~.:l\'0\c\i.\ 4\\\ ~-
.!,,~~~ Geology map no. 2.315 Structure &Y)'';'" I('o~ f'-"4~; 1-
r
Airphoto no qs \{~:''2. C. It) - \}5 So\l:~tm( ~ ~
Surficial material S"r"~4<\"'\ .\\\\., !OCA\\j UTM co-ord . .-JAbtl, OI.\~1. ~~lc E \"'Il~ ~t!a ~.~ c.,,,,,~ ~..A-\c..\\j 5>.~~~_ (zone 1S' ) 5~'2. 3%2.0 N Clasts - _. - - I Ice distance to Size range D·S ..\.<. \ 0 _~_~_ .. _ ..
.. '1 .-.-.--
outcrop S~ :2 Section/Sample Interval % of sample ~o io r
.- ---.- -.. I Outcrop geology ~)~\t. 'i.o\cw..\·~ o metres I
°0 0- D.l ..... : "S ... ~Ic..j\..:, .. Shape _.~ " .... :," \e..r I
D - -~- -- _ ... ' _._ - j
t "" -\i..\\ i I..;,.,,,,\.k •• H ' .. L.. I J
. . ~ Shovel pit ~ . Lithology ~1!.",·.kiL M~ \4 ... ,(. I .J) .-
" .. 0
\lo1(1l."'·'~ IJ It :... 0·1.-0.1. ... ~ ru\'$o...: ... \
Road cut L)..
0 ~ t- ~\t Matrix: -
~l) i'O ! Other exposure % of sample 1 metre --
O.b"" b.,~r.~y. ~ -Est. 0 B thickness O'~M Colour >-- ~\)I(.
, ,Yj uo\c ..... ,<. ~-----.
c--
Additional notes 'No.{ ,,~~ ~:, 0\.", , ....... i-- Grain size class ~.~~ .. 5~~ _ .M~ . _ .... I , f--
?,,~ 'v... sj -4. N-~~J 5\o~ ),", \Ix- I
} "'" f-- --- ~ .. -- ~~--- - - - ... - - -- . I ,..- I - !
2 metres -
i I I
'-'"-' _ . ... . - .. _ .. . ... . •.. - ... --
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ O_f--,-t-~-",,\..-,-,A,-,-,"'..;;:.~ _____ SAMPLE NO.: t=L-bt,· 0"2.'1 COLLECTED BY: ~ b~~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. S2 c.)\~ Topography !L.!~.d. \.u~'1I~~ \.;.~ ~~ I Classification
l.t»~~' ~'r.;cl~ j
Geology map no. 1';,25 Structure
SV~f::l'~ Airphoto no. qs'{~~2. C. It) - \1-5
Surficial material ~~r"'d"<.i .. \ 1\\\ fll""\..e ~ I UTM co-ord . NA(8) o w.1.{~ ~~J E \,,,,,,~.~ 1 ( "'Ie. ~~) s .. \~~¢-l \,,,,,~ .. '3.-_ _
(zone \5' ) 51.\.1..1.5,1,$ N Clasts -Ice distance to Size range
outcrop ~- Section/Sample Interval
% of sample
SAMPLE MATERIAL
s., \. S "<.; ""\ ~\~
Mt..~S\\>I: I CI> ~(e,(\ I
....... ~~ ..
.-----
, I
_..l._-\:2 . ..3Q..CIJ.' ___ ..... _ ... _". __ . I I
~ojo -.----- -- - -- -,--' I I Outcrop geology .k\.,,'c. "~\c ... ,,,i. .. o metres
0 6 0-0.2,,....,·. ~ \)~( ... St.<:,&.\ Shape S.)" ...... "'\j'.c..l---·-·- -----·· l b l-.. ::r
/ D " r' .\-\\\ j ~"'" \ L., "j ~,"",,~.b;~\~; ... \J<;>~""~(~ Shovel pit D Lithology 0 D ~
fJ () IlL 0
Road cut ~ 0.'2 -0.6 ..... ·. SV\J~';"\ I-
-hit i , .... C,'C .... :.-c. Matrix: r-- \ .....
I Other exposure
1 metre r--'i'r"(' .. ,~- o~ s ,..., . .\\
% of sample (,0 i" -.----._----_ . . .. ..
I-- c~c...')\<" I \- \0 Est. 08 thickness 1.5 M
CJv.. Colour O~ \1RI~~.~-cea--'--f--
r- [0. ... ')<-Additional notes ~ ~;\~ '" N-s\~ 01 - Grain size class ~~~_..2~0~. 5~±'-._-
I -c.A..Oo~ ~"~ ~~~~\ b!t'~s!"'" r--
.... ~~ .... u __ . .. _ ._ ..... . "
r-- ~ r--
2 metres I--
--------.---------_ .. _-_._ .. - . ..... ... .. _ . . . ._ ...
• PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no
Airphoto no.
OVERBURDEN DRiLLiN~ANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
OF~ LP.'hE SAMPLE NO.: ----~--~~------------
COLLECTED BY: ~ O'2-~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
51. c.1 \'~ Topography rll~-e.~ ~\\ ~["'\~~~ Classification j I
2!,25 Structure
• SAMPLE MATERIAL
Sv\'~""\ .\\\!
~~\"""I C!!~t.o<.:~ f .w;..-1ij"
h C\Io~ ~u~ot~~ '\S - 4~~1. c.. \~ - \1S - -
Surficial materiai ''2\.~ - --------S"~("'~\"-e\"'\ j)\\ UTM co-ord . N FlDS> 044\\\0 E oc'C,\)..";,,,,,,' . \-: .... Y>~ r.. ... k \/b\(I1.""- ~"\~,) ~c.t\' c
(zone IS ) -- S'\ l. \ e,,, l.. N ,,\. :'YI-kU. _ _ .
Ice distance to
outcrop \0"" ~ Section/Sample Interval
Outcrop geology :k:\Si\ vo\co."':\,- o melres ----°b -- In . ... 0"
~ 4
Shovel pit / I
..D 0
6" I
--> ~
Road cut
~ --
~rt>C.~ -
Other exposure -1 metre
Est. 08 thickness 0.5 "" ;--
r--r--
Additional notes _ ~u.~~l.t. l-'~ s .A ~.~ r--r--
b> Cskc \t..4. -,---
- . 2 metres
;--
-
O-O.(M '. -~\J~r~jc.c., ... \ HI I W.h/')
0.1,-0-5,.... '. '"~clC<;(J
4\\ \
Clasts
Size range
% of sample
Shape
Lithology
:k~:.~t.
Matrix
% of sample
Colour
___ ~_~ __ \..cL~ ._. __ __ . __ .
Sc ]", __ . ___ . ___ . ___ . .. - ..
--_N\~~.skL - _ . ----- .. -
I ,...~ J ... ~j. __ ___ 316"-"i-'" b~'I3.t>·~c..
50 70 ---------
I --. I
I -, i I
--I ;J\~ ---~- .. -- --I
i Grain size class ___ Y~:hN!.._.s.I!."'-~ __ "' ..... ~ __ .. :\\ \.,
.. -- . __ ._._------_ .. -" .
I I !
~--- - .. --_. - - - .-....
OVERBURDEN DRILLING rViANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _..,.:,()c-~,-,~,--,,\.~tI,-,-¥..:=E ______ SAMPLE NO.: 'f\. -0(;, • 02. " COLLECTED BY: ~C>~.:3P\.J
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S? c.l r?> Topography Q"'t\~\,'''~ h ... "''''0 <"j \.?' I .\-\. Classification sv\'(f"b\ -\;\\ 1
~U"!01 ;""-~ l ~Q~S:L _~[!1"--Geology map no. 2~l'5 Structure Co~c.sA ! M4~$'1>C- tN>-!J" \.~ ,
~ ,,\~\- ~vP~~l.k~ Airphoto no. '\5 - ~B:)\c.. \1-11-
SUrfi~ial material -.S;Cf6~~;~\ 1\\ !;:,\~ ----I
UTM co-ord . NNlSl C) 4.4 '1 0() b E ~ .... \-\ .. \lj SIl\Ml'~~ 0,,\ :. . (zone \5: ) SI.\\SSU.5' N Clasts !
.\-0 I
Ice distance to Size range \ ~~_c.~ _ __ ,,_._._ .. i
outcrop 20 ~ S Section/Sample Interval .... !
% of sample ~---~----. .. --. --. i Outcrop geology .w:i~ lIol(,,~i!. o metres !
6° - 0- 0.'2.",,·. ~"Q(~.j\L"';'\ Shape '.i .... \," ... \l~c...--·-· -u_ ........... I -.I)
1
'~ . 7, b ~H I ~"" ck'J -~-L(~----I vi'
, Shovel pit ~
,p lithology ",I::> 0 ..J
D '" \J. t>:z. -0·5 '. '5 .) ~dL"'.c.. \ v I>\c(. ... ,:.. ~t> ,.) .. _~_ ,
Road cut /) r--
! ~ I-- IkJro,"- -\\\ \ Matrix - ! Other exposure
1 metre - % of sample 51:) J", -- -_ .. ---_ ..... _-_ ...
J - f-- -. r-
Est. 08 thickness O.S "" '--
Colour 3~ ~'b4- -_._-_._. '- \ r-->---
Additional notes s<"'~\Q s\~ ~~~le..r bJ~.~ - Grain size class ~.". ~"'-t. s,,~.~.~}.~_._ - 0 \,,,t.. lNl",r ;. k. \3- - -.---.------- ~ ....
-r-
2 metres '--
------- . . . " . . " - .
)
• PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no
Airphoto no.
OVERBURDEN DRILLlN!ANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
• _---'=()'--'-~-'--F__"=_L=AY.=E"----____ ~ SAMPLE NO.: COLLE CTED BY:_--,\\J,...;9I<..flt..'"'i'A..;u::uN=--_
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
S'- c.j I';> Topography ~IO; ~"''''~'''':J \..~~-"'~ Classification 5Y"'c}""i .... \ ~!\ I
2~2.5
,,~.e~ I I.d:~~ J:r"I~~ Structure (O~ .... c.-\- I ~~~h!Q "
~Q,'2~ ~!.!.~(k.\. \
'\5_4.~",!,1 c.... \"":\-1-~
Surficial material ~\, ~~~ UTM co-ord . ~'AIlS> D4.'-\ \"'0<\ E 0~~'~\ ~ h,..,\~[!>
S..>~ (I. eJ \t..c"~ \ S",~~!; .. t "'o~ ~££.~~
(zone \5 ) S4. \ 8b'CS N I 6
Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range \ ~ \ 0 c. .......
outcrop ~() VV'\ S~ Section/Sample Interval
% of sample ~() j" .. -
Outcrop geology ~Cb",;\ -k-.l. o metres
bOt-0 - 0 :1,"" '. ~,,~(" 3""'4.\ Shape Sv\.",,,~,,\v.( h, S ... \,."v>\~ ~
D -K,\\ I (O,,"'.k~ f"'U-Shovel pit ./ .
"'" ~ ~"" ~t '') Lithology So 1., J\"':"~;l. !J 0
~D
r-L :Y->\~ ~o\~r> Road cut
- Matrix: - 0.1--0· b .... \ ').,\,~&.<.\ .... \ "-\,oj" Other exposure - - 1 metre - % of sample
.kl\ Est. 08 thickness l.. \£ M.
-- Colour tJ"'J -\u \~-(. -
Additional notes ~I.o.r . ~., \.t. \~ ~S2 M \N >2~ r- Grain size class ~~j ~ .... ~",.,,). ",_1 ~ ·,I-\-1 r--
"''j~19 ~4).I.; \Y\k~<c\.W.. r--~
t--
2 metres ~
..
I I
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT UMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _--..-::D:..!..'r..!..\=---=-l.:...!..~ \<.!::,.t:::...-____ SAMPLE NO.:
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 52 ell?> Topography v",~u\"'~j W'P'~ Q~ \A1~ t:>f«< ~ f Classification 5~k~i~ '*' \\ w..sz\~ d! .... ~"L.).
Geology map no. 1~lS Structure ~~I~! ~O~II,.4j Q;!~~d: CJ ~s.~ ~(hl
Airphoto no. IiS~IC. - \~--:r~
Surficial material s>!J?c";5'c;..e·, ... \ ~\\ et!!...j,l.;.c:, I UTM co-ord. ",FIbS> Qq~S~~ 1- E ~\b...!! \l8l~~ "'",~ ~ .. r""'\\J ll~~~.l (zone \S ) S"1..\()l~ N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range \ \<> 1.0 c.~ outcrop 5"", ~~ Section/Sample Interval
% of sample 1szD J" Outcrop geology ~:z~ ),/"~~,, o metres
6° f-0- o· 4"" '. "",?r'"J\~\ Shape s..)\.{;O. ... ~\"'c
b I-- -\\ \ , ; ~.,~~rd Shovel pit f- Lithology 3'1 .... \ki~ I J4.<;is.. YO\Cl,,~l(,
tJ • ~ o t> rP suI.,Jv..c.,;)
cu..l ...ye..~a. ~ Road cut /
~ N 0 .4-1·0"" '. 0
!P r
~\\ srv-<. \\<! r c\~'" 5. Matrix: .J) 0 I
,",0 j!:! Other exposure . () . % of sample -' 1 metre 6 0 ~
Est. 08 thickness I,S r. I---
Colour ~~'~~J~ l-f--
Additional notes ~~. - ¥\<~e~~l S\\t. I- Grain size class 1~ '5!1~~ ~"~ ~;.\:\: f--
Sa",r,dt= \X'wC."l\........ I N oI ~'\k 51. r--
I-~
2 metres t--
J ) J
I ~
• PROJECf:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord . ~I\I>'6'1.>
(zone \5 )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. OB thickness
Additional notes
OVERBURDEN DRILLiNAANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
• __ -"'-O.L.F.!....r--'L""'A:uv......,E:>.--_____ SAMPLE NO.: Fl.- ob- 02.~ COLLECTED BY: ~ O'l.~.....l OA TE. -:s v\~ 1 S1 010
LOCATION SURFICIAl,.. GEOLOGY
5;2. e-Ir> Topography :OSl~"'~\) 11l6~!o.\" lr;"'0 \..:~\ ~~. , I . .c 1.1 dl~~~i~
2~2.s
'\'5 4.1Q~\c. ~1-q<D
Surficial material SI2?I"J~;b.\ b\\ I k2>l \~r~ o w,-;,€>,\ I-n· E ~'.-<.~l. Q!o .... ~ ~ ..... \;..l\] :l ... ~~ ~ rt !.. S'\"l..O~1-> N
10 M S\J Section/Sample Interval
-_. ~', !lQ\~i, o metres
of> _. 0-0·3 ..... ·. 5"'r~j""';.1 -0 ,- h\\ , c0v .. ~ ",.,\ ./ D
" D 7 '{; c .. ..,,,~~ ~ov\krl;, -!:> 7 ? •
'7 ..P 0·)-0.",,,,, " DO 0
tL ..J
() u..
1 metre D -
2""" -"-
-'I\Il:O...r ~\~ 5'1. t .W .S- r-
r-
SAMPLE MATERIAL
Class Ification
Struc\ ure
:i'I~
- -----------_._- - ----
Clast s
ange Size r
% of sample
Shap e
Lithol ogy
Main x:
sample % of
Colo ur
Grain size class
_----'L-.~~ 20 (J:'~ ______ . __ . _.
___ (,"-Q~jo=_____ . _____ . _ . _ _
----- .. - ~ I ~i\.o.. .. Qc\.~-:f_-h I ~ 5AA~ ""~ ", __ ~_. _ ___ ._ I
I~~! ___ .\-v:...- \:,.. \'",~k -~
r--
2 metres "--
----..... -- - - -.'---
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord. ,,>lInn
(zone t~ )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness
Additional notes
~ ww ,s.;\t !I!.I~IQ~:'
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
O~~ lA'\:.E SAMPLE NO,: --~~~~------------
COLLECTED BY: ~ Q"2.~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
~;l.. c/l'2 Topography ;-J~~ ....l.,u,,~ .... , .. A- o';"'-nIIQ Classification " I
l..t~ ~1~1~ 2~2.5 Structure
'\5 - j~~\<- \~ -+v c.J a.~ ~~':1
Surficial materia l 5"v~~~~i><' .\..\\ , ~~0\~(~ 04..~~"''2S E ,---_ .. ~1.\."2..02"':!l N Clast s:
Size range 5111\ t-J Section/Sample Interval
% of sample
~(.. vJ)\:o.,,\( o metres b o f- 0-0-1 ",, -, ~~ ... ,j"'-ui..' Shape 6 0
/' v ~ 'C .ti. \\ o ()
, Li thology .Jj
~o 'rI-I 0 J "b\aAA\~ i.J \.l- o-t· c:s "" '_ S,,\'~c.cl" ,
~ f-
~(oa. f- .\-\ll Matrix' 0/ f-
% of sample 1 metre f-
C/ ·S"" ~~fO~
O.b M I---
Colour f-
I-
DATE: ~~ 2S!ol.
SAMPLE MATERIAL
S\.l\j"'''''\ :lS~ \
~~511~ 1 bQhl~~
\ ~ 20 ,"-__________ .P_.
-- ----- 1 (.,01"
') .. \I6 .... ~>\c., ~ (h?-~~f>£.__ _ I lQ j., ~r..",,\.,\~ 1 ~o~o ~,,-h_
~ol .? I ,
-
\
~\'j-
~~~\Q ~;k l!:t \:.\.,~ ~~~~.,.... f- Grain size class k S ...... L~,\\ __ _ ..... _ f-
5\ )
\ \to' ~\~ kk% .\-.,Q f-- -----.---~- -. - -.- --.-. ..
-'---
2 metres -
'- -- ' .-. . " - . -.... - - "".
• • OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED • FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ ...::.()...:..r..:...)=---'Lo..!.A..:...>'f.=E:.....-____ SAMPLE NO.: SJ:...: .. Db ~ O~\ COLLECTED BY.· ~() "2~N DATE: 11>\'j 28/0'0
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAM PLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 51 ell"!? Topography fII~~l. W'oa.. ""'.\., Classification sv\'~\,,"", .t\\ I
0.\,1> ..... ~"'.,,\. 5
~ r-.J ,,,,,\l ~!I>..~~' I :iU\OIMf! •
Geology map no. 1~2..$ Structure U!~~c.!.-\- I ~~~I~ J ~il\~ - -d
Airphoto no. o..s - I{~~\c... n -:r~ ...•.
Surficial material ~I"";"'" ~>I~(~~ .\;, \ \ I
UTM co-ord. lJo.<;)~" Q~qS'"·~ E ~~i. ~!eo~ ~o!llhL ~\~l (zone \'5 ) 'S\t\~b 10 N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range \ ~ to<. ....... outcrop "S"'" S Section/Sample Interval
% of sample 1.0 :J'l Outcrop geology ~~~"{. :J~\c"'''';(. o metres
<:=>()
~ - o ~ o. \ '" \ "'ffk ~ .. ~\~ \ Shape 7oJ~fv\;::V\...C r'l \. Q +;.\\ I So...,\kl"'ir
~ l:> • ..D
Shovel pit .6 '? Lithology ~o..~J·'!)~t G!.. ... ~ t-<-";-<.. ~ 0.\-0.$"" .. "),.)'o\G..t:4.\ f.> 0 \J. ~bkoA~~",
Road cut f- 1:.,\\ r- Matrix: f-
Other exposure 1 metre t-- % of sample 8070
.'
Est. 08 thickness 7 \-5 M - Colour ~e~, ~'1r -to - CJI~ f--
Additional notes s~".f: o~ s\~ "'It> ., !10 -h'~ r- Grain size class W"J~"" ~/6Ilo~ '-'"'l s.!1~ ~ .. \, J
"~L{"~~ t--
~ c-~ ...... ~~ ~' ... l,.. ~>l.dd \.....:... o..,..l I--
~ !i~)(\.... t-- t f-
2 metres f-
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord ~1\'i>~1
(zone IS' )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. OB thickness
Additional notes
N~~\'J s.
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
COLLECTED BY. \\O'2.::~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
S:l. (,k~ Topography (V~I1:~ -~
t I.£t~ df~I....t.}. Classification <;\.)\,&'1 .... , A;.\\
2."!>25 Structure r-'\/.LSS'~ I (Q~~"'~ 1
~~~!.\ ~v~~4~ '\10 - "\8~\C n-1'~
Surficial material ~("(.o.6K\:c..\ -\\. \ \ 1.o!1·~
{)~3'\ S~ E O""I~II~~\ ~II\~ 5 ~'lO t~~ N Clasts
Size range ~ ~ 10 ,,~_. __ . _____ __
20 \'V\ SE. Section/Sample Interval
% of sample 10 ,~ ----~- .. ·l ~f<. Vb \!A"i~ o metres
I "'.:;:, 0 I-- D -0.'2,...', ':l~rc..~\t..::... ... , Shape 2" \. r..{\ ~,) \ .... c ----- \
/ 0 .. "IL -\\ \\ . r-l 4"'~ e~(,. .f.> ? rJ\ Lithology (f"'''''\\o'¢. D
'-t ...D o,2-~,~"" " "Ju '->dt...<.\i... \ \i2XA",t, ~ <> 0
f/f ~ e:,. r:- \).. -\... '\\ Matrix:
/) I-~o;o -\ 1 metre I- % of sample
7 \,S M-f- Colour ~~. 'y,\"t 1o~ ___ · 1 I--I-- I
~,.;.~~ c;\~ s;',k I{t;, I-- Grain size class \lU~ .l\-:..... ~ .... ~ "' .... { ~~\\ . -. \ fY-1t!.. I--f- -_._---_._-.-.-. . " .. - .
l-t--
2 metres I--
_.'-_.- -- • __ . & •• • -- . - - - - •••
)
• • OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED • FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: o~f lAY,E SAMPLE NO.: ----~~~~~--------
t:-L- 0 b - 0 !, ., COLLECTED BY: \\O'2"S'£1;N DA TE. _~=~=\~T2:::"';'C"'-I-f~O=\o_
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 5').. c!\,) Topography \OC) \~"J .... ~I !..l"~~ ~tA.\VO i Classification S u \, 0\"""'-\ -btl
Geology map no. 1.~1:S Structure \) q.t'j (Q~.£,:\ I ~!'!'5~1Z!: . i
~r.,~h s ... ~~.k~, c1'''Ii!~ Airphoto no. '\5 -~~~\C- \l--".}Io '\ l
Suriicial material S~~~"~''''' l(,.\\ , OC<@lL';""'\ .. -- - . UTM co-ord . ~'fI';)n ~'-\l\O1-1-8 E ~C""II,..·\~ ~,,~~t~ (zone \S ) 5'j.\~ S:~2 N Clasts .
Ice distance to Size range ~ .\.., ~\!)~--.-.--. outcrop Section/Sample Interval
% of sample '1.010 I
.. - --,,-1 Outcrop geology to\A o metres
I
C>
~ rJ' 0-0.\1'\ '. ""'r ... ~c:.<.\ ... ' Shape $v\' ~ "\j Ic..c ----------1 ~ ~
/' 0
~ -\\\\ <;,\.\ d.~ClC",~ Shovel pit b " 0 I Lithology ~">6"~"~ """'~ ~ I
C. ~
v,,\co,J\ 'L \.1-.0 " ..
Road cut '-- o·\-o·S""·. Sv\,~(.(,\~\ "- Matrix: .-- -\\\ \
Other exposure 1 metre ~ % of sample gok
!
C:st. 08 thickness \M, - Colour I - ~b -Additional notes 5Sl~~ o~ ~'I~ 4'2- . ~!::.~t :-- Grain size class i W
J t~ :1~"'~ '-!.~ Sl~+ .. 1 r-
~IM. k"~~;"') ~&A~ 'MW Qg,!'>I"""~ L\<:.. '2..0. I-- lU.I.l c\'O I--
r-2 metres r-
--- -------~- - .. --.-- --. ........ -
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
'f\.-o6- o~'1 COLLECTED BY: ~O'2.Sf\N DATE: :iv\~ 2.SJolp PROJECT: D~f- UW,f: SAMPLE NO.: --~~~~~----------
LOCATION
I\JTS map no.
Geology map no. 2"2>2$
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord. JJ&\~a> ___ ~o,,-'\-,-"'),-,C\:....:5~Su.1"L.-___ -=E;:...
(zone IS) 5'\\f,qoY. N
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. OB thickness _____ 7.:......o>~M:>....... _______ _
Additional notes
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Topography
d,rNW~
Surficial material S~(~~\Q(,\;"'\ 1\ \ I M'If'i,.,
~rz.." .. Is\? Ioo.:,\~<, ~ms~
Section/Sample Interval
o metres
1 metre
2 metres
~
rf
rf-
--'--
-
o - D.l M '. s~~rt..0\:...:"\
-1\ \ \
(H-O.I>,... -_ S\l~J~"'\
.\\\\ I c.~"-J ", ... l. Si.\~-(\l\.-
SAMPLE MATERIAL
Classification
Structure >40J cQ""rrx~ , C\CA ... ;t" ,.,.... \-'~ s",~Tl\ 4¢.-
Clasts:
Size range \ -\-., \01:....,..
% of sample
Shape
Lithology
Matrix:
% of sample
Colour
Grain size class --~\>e~''J~"''~~~S~<I.~~~'''''''''}..:.-2.<;\u.\ -t.!--_ "'" ~ c\y"",
L-_____________________ ~ ________________________ ~ _____________________ _
• • OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED • FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _-=D....:...fr-'-----'=l~A=\(f'__ ____ SAMPLE NO.: ~L- ceo - 02>5 COLLECTED BY.' ~t)~:s] N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S"- Cll~ Topography ~ ~v~.. , t:::; Classification s~f.r-9-\ -\; \\
0"f~i t ... o'l.s I k \.00.. ~ ..... ;; .....
~Jl. Geology map no. 'l.~1$ s!o~ =- r-I,,~ \cJc.c.. Structure ~~1~ ,~~ i I' j
d,,~') I ~r.~I·" ~v~..4cA. Airphoto 110. as - '-\'t>'btl~ oB- r~~
Surficial material :~ 51<"~1'-~ :\i,\~ UTM co-ord. j.)Q.!l~~ 0".'1"1-50 (., E lol~~ Q<;c~",~,
(zone \S' ) 5"131~1 N _,,_k.,s_ ~_ .3:0" l)
Clasts
Ice distance to Size range \ - ~ C t":: I "'~.~_.!l~_. outcrop ,2.0 "" S Section/Sample Interval
% of sample S 10 -_.
Outcrop geology s;J.~"" oJ<>~c~'~ o metres
tJ° - 0- c ·1,....·. s,,~\c. 0~\~ \ Shape 5"\'''''~( '- ---
Shove! pit J 'D ~
-\\\\ ~..., \''''''\~'':> Lithology C\ CAIe', \oIl. (.. ... ~ ~s_i<.. __ . ___ .. 1
~ (
o ~
PW~;"I\) c;....\M#J~ 6 : 54 ... oJO\Ct;J..6~S, I
Road cut (D IJ
~ J)
I 0 .:...
tI . ~-t>. S A,.. '. S~\~l.t.:_\ Matrix !J \ U. I
Other exposure 1 metre ~ - -\.\\\ ( ').\\~ I C~~J.LI % of sample /\'$ jo
~ r--I:;.st. 08 thickness 0.£,,,,, Colour ()~ - bt'\C" \0 ~ o."6~ " tJIO'''- ~ (S~- -~
Additional notes $ik, ~ 5,4 10 0"'-r- ~\')~ \/,,\,.. ... ;( Grain SiZi class ~~ _~i~ ",.,.t£* __ ~L I -
~S'I\1 L..u. I Ne- e..,. r>e( - ck'J $,\\ \u~., -- -I
,--
r--
2 metres - I I
__ ._ .. __ ._ .. ____ . ..J
PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord Ll'l.D&J,
(zone \s )
Ice distance to outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness
Additional notes
')\Q~g..
)
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
_~O...!..F..!-F-----=:LA~~~E,--____ SAMPLE NO.: ~l- Ob - 0 ~(" COLLECTED BY: \\b"2:s-A,r4
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
51 clc~ Topography ~",.L\,,:4, \ ~~ I ~U Classification S';'\'V'+ci ... \ ~\\
d,( leil'!! ~
2:!J 2: $ Structure ~"-~li\~ I <:O~~~ I s::.\c..~.\.
~ kL..~ \~ S'~D(hl '\S -l{£,~o \k Q~-\~O
Surficial material ~I""~\~\;"'\ +.\\ "'"~\!V\?"'" ..\, ----I
C"f~-:t 1i-:) 1- E (5~!!\" ~ I:.o~ ~~ ~ ~ S~l~1: S4.n ~s~ N Clasts:
Size range \ \0 10 cV"
Section/Sample Interval (;,010
, % of sample --- I
~IA o metres 0 0-0.:'"" '. '; .. ~I .. 0~'\;'" Shape SI!\'~~~ _____ .. __ . . _1
0 t---
- -\-;.\\ ( 'oo-.>\bl':j ./ ".0
~ lithology "+0 "),, ~ct\.":\\o;ll ~oi" M."'~ . ~ o . c.tl
~D\C!b"~<' £) • 0 b.)-t>.S .... ·. ~"\,~K\~\ oJ) 0t> 0 4\\\ I 0.1 b"'J._-\. ,
D ...J Matrix: u- 5M<..\\.w cl.t..'l>~') i % of sample ~oio
1 metre - ------.-
I - Colour S~-I.:.z·& \.5 M I-- --'
---W/W ~\\t. 0'\ I ~-4c;~ I-- Grain size class ~_~~ c..~.5~ ._ .. _._
t--r-- ----.---~--
--
2 metres -
--- . ~- ... . ... _-- .. _- -_ . . .. .....
I
I
• PROJECT:
OVERBURDEN DRILLINIANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
DF-f lA-¥.£; SAMPLE NO.: ----~-=~~----------
t=l~ ob - D~1- COLLECTED BY: \\l'>"l.'$9IN
LOCATION SU RFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. 51- clr~ Topography u'" ~I>\!,>: ~"'~ I ~~ef~~ IdI:~ Classification
dr&I~1. ~. I
Geology map no. 2~1S; Structure
Airphoto no. "5 ~ l{~,!>o ~ ~~Hi:lr~l.. ()~ - \~O
Surticial material 1=\\';O\r 5~15"-(.''''\ .\-\\ I ~"'\~
UTM co-ord.IJ"'!)S") 0:1, :. b -:rs 'l- E ~l~ C~\o(.~~ 6"~~ ~o.~< t.S;2:l! ~~! I'l,k;. (zone~_) 5'-\n \c'1. N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range
outcrop Section/Sample Interval
% of sample
Outcrop geology N!~ o metres /::,0 r-
0-0 .llV' '. 5,",pr"s~","\ Shape 0
C>
~ t+- -\-\\\ r bo .... \~')
./ • C; Shovel pit .
...0 lithOlogy '() a [) .1- 0." ..... ' . s"'\'8"";' \ . ..
ci: Road cut () . f..\\
~r."k.. ~ r-- Matrix: r
Other exposure 1 metre I-- O,b ..... ~ ~ll''''( - % of sample
Est. 08 thickness - ~~'<. vO\C<o. ... ,(.
Colour O.b "... --
• DA TE: ~\l\':'J '1. /0("
SAMPLE MATERIAL
s,",\'~: ... , 1\\
CO~~.l. I ~"-~l~ I f-'<,... -\.c"i,
~ -\0 10(. .....
~o ~o
s "\»G.", ~j'> \.,.. r
~lO--ni, vok,,\~ I jA-..:,k·,!.
~o 't{o .
0e.s~'~ Additional notes 'i,\t. tJ1- I ~ E ~s...;"') >-- Grain size class l&J ~ ~~ s......~.:....J. ~,\l ~(>.$"
\'''a r-- J
~\~II. \I\a.ur ~~ ... ~ [\':J~ r--I--r-
2 metres I--
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT UM1TED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: 'D~~ \....A\L..E SAMPLE NO. : 'f\.-ob-t>~'6 ----~~~------------
COLLECTED BY: ~"2.;sp,N DA TE: "1 \l\~ 2"\ f ()" LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. Topography (1I~(1 W,o'X,
W) 5Y>"'Mf +0 -Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
Surficial material _..aS~"'\U-'f!.!."-'d..,.,a=y",-,; .... ""'\'---'-~::l.\ \,--",l:::,~;..1.,;:b..::...-.. ___ _
_ _ .......::.......:..=....~~~ ____ -=E=-- *"'e ~\s\w. N
Shovel pit /
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 0 B thickness "'" \.& M ------~=-------------
Additional notes 'l\AW' S;k 0 S 1/'-20 AI' 5
of .f\"~ ~ ct"j..... b
Section/Sample (nlerva{
o metres
1 metre
2 metres
£) 0
r~\~ ~ t"<~ ~ .f \~ ~
r->--
rr-
r----~
r--rI-
r-
0- 0.\ '" '. 5vel"j\.&"~\
-\\.\\ r ~o->\ ~')
o.t-c ·s",,: 5"'\$'""''''\
-k. \\ (~~J ,,,,\,,J I
J.\~~U \.\- ~ s.."'f\c..
Classification
Structure
5\~~6Ya~1
Clasts :
Size range
% of sample
Shape
lithology
SAMPLE MATERIAL
~\\
_ _ ...c-'J...-.:"\""'CM-"""->o.,.>.... .. ___ ~ _____ ___ _
Matrix I
% of sample -- I COlour . 3~' \a\1 I Grain Size class .~~_"1.~J_.~~~ ._11.\Lt. .. _ I
G~ __ _ ... __ .n_ I
I
'------------------------'-------------------------- ----'--_ ._-------- --_._ .. _ .... ... __ . - -.--- ---- . _ .
)
• PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no
Airphoto no
UTM co-ord. IJ"\)\',J
(zone _I '5" __ )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness
Additional notes
si k. 0'1
OVERBURDEN DRILLlN~ANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
OPF- LA~E- SAMPLE NO.: ----~~-=~~--------
t:-L- 06 - o~c" COLLECTED BY: \\O'2.:s'A,..J
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
52 c.121\ Topography rw~~~ , rv.. .. .\-~ Meo.-1 ~''''~''ll Classification
~\:'Illl:! ~L\\u I v<-\\ d[~,~~
2'!.lS Structure
• SAMPLE MATERIAL
Sv~dlACik-- \ :b \\
('OMP"v\ r t.Ac..~s,~ , ~~,'~ -k s;~,,::.~ ~~~I~~
q5 -~~~oQ;, O'&-\SO
Surficial material ~r0~c\;" -h\\ ~"'!ll'1 -\0', L --.----- ---i D4.~&b~\ E k>N\,k~ ~<;!." ~\.,.,..),- - I
5",\5 ~~'§ N Clasts I I
Size range l~Q...9"" ___________ I
I \0 >A S Section/Sample Interval % of sample - 401., ------_ .---- - i
.\.<\,\\. \/.,\c"",;!.,. o metres I b-O.~/'A '. :S~i'd"~"'\ Shape S,blMlj\G...f
I D ~ .. ----, .. -- "".- I
!> - -\\\\ (~J \.o..,\k:J J o/J
~ Lithology bC t, ;j'w!,o,i I 3" ~:k~,_ .. ., . . ,..r)
00
(J Il o\(.~"~~ . \0 t1]Q "",,-"<. .... \(""'~ . o :~- 1;>. 8M " S"\'0~":"\ .D I
.!) 0 , -\<.\\ {\e...t.r, srv-v\~ . -' Matrix
t> ~ ~ I % of sample 1&0 1~ 1 metre !-- c\"'::'~'.> --.-----.---. i
\.5 M t-- Colour ~<j- ~"tf- -\0 6~J--------,1 f--
-fS- hl'''~ ~\~ "'-4(1..(' - Grain size class \>e'':J k 5~L~~5'\~ _____
r---'- --'-'-"-~'.--.
I I
r-- I r-- i 2 metres r- ,
I -- - ----_ .. . "' .... . .. - .
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ D-.;r-'f----"L:..:..;A~')(i::~ _____ SAMPLE NO.: ~\..- ~b' t)4.c COLLECTED BY: ~ 1l2.:s'AN
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. 51. cll'2 Topography f.oJ~~J. I \,.:.\1 ~~ N .... .b..,;~, Classification , J
sI"{Jo I .... t>\1 ¢.r,,\.$t
Geology map no. 2~lS Structure
S"~~2l ~t Airphoto no. '\5 -'\6~~ ~ o~-I~O
Surficial material :2I<\l [~(A~l!:. \ h\\ f \()~ ~ .~ UTM co-ord. ~1l,I>S:' D4.~"()S\ E ~c..(~ ~ihl\.hr~ SPtW. "11 \ t--
j
(zone \2 ) 54.\5~5b N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range outcrop I'- 51) M N Section/Sample Interval
% of sample Outcrop geology ¥.\~;L I/o\c %'(, o metres
0 0 f-- 0-0 .'-\",'. $"~("'$'"';c..\ Shape f::,
r--\\\\ , Io\)->\~ ,
Shovel pit J °D r-- Lithology
~ ~~\\<l\.> -0'\.''(..
!::>" ()
Road cut :r
" 0 \) . I;. - \ ,0",, ', Sv \,jt'>l:\;' \ ~
. ~
..I) Matrix: 0
Other exposure 6'" .J -\\\\ I ~~. ~.~ \0 % of sample
1 metre \,.I..
Est. OB thickness \·5/11'>. - Sj Colour -
,---
SAMPLE MATERIAL
~v\\~C>G'''''' \ -h.\1
t',"'~~ii.-<. . (D ~k..lr , ........... ~ l~ ,
\ .\.e \o~~ I ~,,~ '"'~ l..o SOc~
YJ1.."
s .) \, "":1 \<if
""","\;l" \,10\''''''''. ! (f"M'~"~
1{) ]0
&~-~\t -\oJ''"]
Additional notes ::Z'lk ,,~~ - ~("'~<.\~~I.c.~ ., '-- Grain size class ~r '" hw ~,,~~ ~~ sM I- j
\,J o~ rl.-Ob-o~S f--f--r--
2 metres I-
)
J
• • • OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED
PROJECT: ---LOCATION
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord. ~1\J>8?:. __ ---'-o---'4.~~~S.....:4..=.5 ~__"____ ___ ---.::E::.-. (zone \5') S"\\SOL{6 N
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness 7 2 "'" ------~-------
Additional notes s; ¥: 'tiP( ~'%iW :;,~ 11 \
oJ· b o£ ho"\spr!c. ~ .. :>1. I N-b'''J 51¥, i t-Jok ~ k •. :, \ ~ <4'" 0", MI)~S s,,:; s" .... VIc.) B-op-O~\ +.., ClI:I,} dq'!-s"".{. :N,'S+'
FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
SAMPLE NO.: 'f-l-D6-ol..\\ COLLECTED BY: \~o:z.S/\~
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Section/Sample Interval
o metres
1 metre
2 metres
---
0-0·2",,: 51''0\''''''':'\
~\\ ( ~u\~uJ
D.2.-0.E,,,,,·, SvI:.J"'C1i..\
-h\\ I ~- ... ;,l..
Classification
Structure
~v~cn"~
Clasts
Size range
% of sample
Shape
Lithology
&<'b,·c
Matrix:
% of sample
Colour
SAMPLE MATERIAL
Grain size class I .... "'" k s_~ "'>\\~ a.","~ --.I '
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _~D...;...F..:...f. -"L:..:...;ffi.=E=--_____ SAMPLE NO.: COLLECTED BY: \.\O'Z311N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. 51. Cl\~ Topography \QIc! t5'" I ~~ .. ~ 1~t~ 1 Classification
~6""'\~';':~ W'O~l= ,.'h~ ~5 Geology map no. 1~S"
0 Structure
Airphoto no. ~5- y.~2>o ~ 08-\1'5 ~w~~d~~
Surficial material ?!?~rQ:. 6\,..u(" \ ~\\ e!!o.~·~.\a;~ 1
UTM co-ord. ~P.J)g3 Dlt.~53:S~ E ~~ &:\5~ ~bk~i,- ""'w\~~ ~~ c;.,1~~ (zone \5 ) S4,\51oe N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range outcrop ~D oM ~ Section/Sample Interval
% of sample
Outcrop geology ~~A, ~\Cll",;C. o metres ~ 0-0.2. ...... '. 5"fV'~5\~,: .... 1 Shape
!)o -.
~ '" ~ll . bvU~r~ 'tl :r
Shovel pit .J ? , Lithology 0 ~ \11>\ a..";s. b .J
<)v'd~ Road cut V- o·'2.-o.~_ '. f
I-- ~\\ Matrix: I--
Other exposure 1 metre - % of sample
Est 08 thickness 11M - Colour ~
I--
SAMPLE MATERIAL
S\)\"O~\c..\ :h\l
Co ~~s.! ~Cl..S511~ I j ~"'~\I.
~ ~ \S~
~Q:J2
,.h.J'fl.f ~ '=="'",'w.r
~:J", ~~~', (;P"lg ~,\o,-~ I lQ:J,9 ..... ~'- uO ..... ~
'{O]9
b~~'~ Additional notes \\l!(W :::.;k C'l. I ~lii -t.i\"j I-- Grain size class ~~ ~~ ~~ ,"" ~ ~~l
f,\o~ (~~~) - J ---
2 metres -
I
)
.-
• -• OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED •
FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PRO,JEeT: D~F Ur~~ SAMPLE NO.: --~~~~~-----------
DATE: :s~ 30/010
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 5~ c/ \:2 Topography oJ, lae I;~ £-~ , £~~~ Classification 50 '=-dpc ,'"", ~l\ <I
Geology map no. 2~2..5 Structure ~¥,l... C U~e"I:<\ ,~ \ i
+c 16".i" ,'~ Sv~~~.lt~ v
Airphoto no. ~S - ~~~o~ OS - \1-~
Surficial material ~!"':11X ~~I~d~I·6.' -k!~ UTM co-ord. ~~g~ o 4~E> CI:;) ~ E a~~ t".~!ol\~.&r!o (zone \~ ) 5~\~~\~ N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range ~ b \ 0 c..e. outcrop "" NW Section/Sample Interval
% of sample be, jo Outcrop geology ~ i:5~ .i ~~ c."'~ o metres
~~::.\~ l.!,\ S:~V< ~(.. 0 .~ 0-0.3.",, ' . ~ v~r"-.J\G.<.'4.\ Shape !J.,,~ c..{j,(~l~r.
./ D - .k\\ St>" \,k..j
Shovel pit . .. ~ ) lithology G;,o io ~\s.;c. 110\"'''''' ! 2010 !:> <> . I 6,~~kl-}. 2" (0 ~e--s.~ vo \,~",-,<, DO ...D o .. !.-o·1,...... " S" ~0\"'«~ i 0 I
Road cut 0 . -'
Wroc.~ ~
-\\\.\ I ~ \of-'.4-+.", Matrix:
~~ Other exposure 1 metre 5.:.~:. ( -it l. % of sample ~o 10
I'
Est. 08 thickness 0,1,.,.... I-- (I.T ..... '. ~.h~~ - Colour ~~\~ -o~~r~ f-- () I-- ~l'< VIl\(C\"'l~ I toolo
Additional notes "'-Ao-.r ::..~~ o"}. ~\c.. - Grain size class ~~w- ~4."'~ ~~ ~'.\l / /-'(,..·hc d....:,.t , O' ... J~\c.r ~G - W") :-\Q~
---I--
2 metres f-
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ O.::...f~'f.!..--=\..c.:...;"':..:.:\'..~~ _____ SAMPLE NO.: ~l-C(,- O'-\.I.\ COLLECTED BY: \\t>2-d1'~
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 5 '1 c..1\~ Topography 1~ ~'J' ~!l~hw4~ !o.! ... lv~:h .. :) Classification ?~~0kc-i"'\ tH
Geology map no. ·2..:~2S' Structure ~c..~..\ 212~~CS:(l...~ . foAb~~~ ~2~~ck- I :11~.""~ J .\\n r
Airphoto no. 55 SUrficia',matena, ~'~~:;r::;:\ ~~
UTM co-ord. ~~!l'O) DI{pss8o E 6 tcC>.},""'''' \ ~.\".\~ \~ (zone \S ) :.5"\\~ ~1-o N Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range O.S -\<> 6,0 CNv-
outcrop rOo M 'S\..:> Section/Sample Interval % of sample 10ie
Outcrop geology .tu~i~ ~b\co.~~ '3 metres 0- 3"" ~ I\o-l. Shape s»So. ..... o,,\.o.c D r-
~o .. e.\ J ~'.::I'D""'" !)
~ rI'
Shovel pit . ::r lithology Col) 2" \t.\:. .. , \/Jc """(. . ./) . 0 3·'2..- :,:'t ..... '. s~~3 ....... \ J 0 ..D 1 0 h "" ... ·h. yo\, ...... ,,'-, 2010 0"""" .\..:, l
/ .IJ.o 0 +.l( I c\c..~ !l\)~H~d. I Road cut ~ 'b I).
~ ... l) Matrix: r-~oJ;) Other exposure
t.t metre r- % of sample
-Est. 08 thickness iSM Colour \.z\~ It.. ~~-~'1 -
-Additional notes 5",~\a ~'a.... .,J ~ :-- Grain size class 1~ s~ ,-J :i·ll.\;
Slolt~t.S1l. i--
o~ (II"'~ , .J, ) "'"~~ I".\c,~ r-
r-
I--
S metres r-
)
-. - -
OVERBURDEN DRILLINAANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG •
PROJECT: _---"C):....;.~....:.f-____=L=-W\.:..:..\(:..::E:'--____ SAMPLE NO.: COLLEC TED BY:_-,-,~-=-"l.!~:;i'A><.:....;.;..N-,---_
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 52- ck~ Topography M()ck ...... ~~ '2~ 1".\!. .\- .... ) Classification $"';,$""-14.\ :\:) \\ ,h~ \ ~ \c.i"
j
Geology map no Z~2.S Structure C9 ~c-cA- t M<>-~~l~ , ~A..:,)!,.
Airphoto no ,\'5 -\{~~\C n-1~ <;"'~F;~')
! "b'1':J
Surficial material s.,~[~\ .. c..~\ :h\~ t \(..~ ('J!~~ UTM co-ord. ~'f\D~) O,\Yl. b"::t:} E 8Cb.~' k,'~ ","- ~ ~ y. \c""~~~ ~ .. ,.>\~ S. ~~ (zone IS ) 5'{I,\D 53: N sulL Clasts
\ I
Ice distance to Size range h._~~c,..~ __ .. ' '" _'.' '- ' 1 outcrop 1-0 W'V\. ~ ... ~:S Section/Sample Intervat
% of sample ._.\ Cl 10 ._--_ . . __ .. . _- - \ Outcrop geology MY£<. \JolcQ..",i<. o metres i
0 ()- 0-8 M '_ ~"'~(""J\(,.(.:"" Shape S\)~"",j~"'-C __ __ "'" _H . .. . .. _
I
6 I-
I 0,_ ~H\ cL~~I\"'l.. ~ D
I
Shovel pit i-- 1 Lithology 5b f~ ~(o.M'~~ I s<:> Ie .-~ l f---roo.~ s,,-, \hr..) ._-_1 !) r-- I"'<A..~' .J. Q:~ ,,,.a.dI,,'t.
V' " I Road cut ,., >--O.'e> -\-o1·S ..... ·. s ... \Ic..<..· .. \ " f-- Matrix: b
~ -ht\ ( ct~ Is" \+ "-<""'p ____ Cj~).'9 _ ____ .. __ . __ .. ____
I Other exposure
, % of sample
1 metre I'"' 0 \n T
~""~-\-!:> ,
~ 0
Est. 08 thickness S"'" I Colour ~,~ .\0 ~J0~'~ -I
( -P . . --lJ 0
~ ,
Additional notes r,,":~ c....d ~';\c. 2.2- I.l '- .oJ Grain size class \)~\!i.._~)......Q.....~...s.'!-i~ __ . .. . ~~If l). t
~ ~,...~ c\j_' I
f-- .--.~- .--.-.. -" ' .. - .... . -. ,-,-. .... ..
I r--f-- I
2 metres r--
I I --.. . - .... -_. ~ .. ,. - .-- . -.- .-. - . . '
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: __ .:.OFLF-.J....-'L-..!A:u\(~E"~ ____ SAMPLE NO. : ~l-Ob-o\{10 COLLECTED BY: \\o'Z.~tJ
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S). C.{I"S Topography ~C>~t"-\t.\~ 1.20 ~v\c.h-::J Classification s.., b 0'«,;,,\ ~~\ -h\\ ~\",i .. J $~ g"'~"IQ~ -h...c.c!r
Geology map no. 2~:l.S Structure C""1 c.cA I ""M<,";<' rt-~I\ , ~ C~'"~~ ~~~~ ~ I :S" .. ~lb
Airphoto no. '\5- ~&~\(... ~1--1'1 ~
Surt,cial material ~'. \ ~\ I ~,"";J,..1 -UTM co-ord. 1'Il~~1. O~~2..qq!o E o.. .... l w--t-t. (5 0 7. o. ~~~~_
i (zone IS" ) 5:\19 2:,Q N eoc~ 1:"'...sUo. Clasts I
Ice distance to Size range \ ~---h.--.2.2-~---_- -.' I outcrop 1M W Section/Sample Interval I ,
% of sample .~~---------... --.--- ....
! Outcrop geology Mu~t. y:ol(' .. ~,·~ o metres 0- 0.:'",,', 0.,. j" .. ,Li I
"'- Shape ~.-.-.- .---.--- .. -.. ! c-o '>'1rt-' -0 ~i ... \ -\\11 ~
t-- ~ .... 1 I Shovel pit I-- lithology 6D16> ~ \l~\'L J "!\)'}L_I !:J
I-- ~~b·" ..... ~ 0
~ • .!,oj L / f) c- I
Road cut . r- I .!J t-- 0.'1- \·5"" : S~~ \t.(:",' Matrix L-
bc1~ I Other exposure 1 metre I), ~ r--
+;\\ J ~''' .. ~~ % of sample .----------.- I
0Jj
~ ..!i>
Est. 08 thickness \.5 M ::r Colour S'J- ~-rt I 0
. e . -_ .. _. ! 0
...... l·S M :. ~,,,,,'t. -.1
0
t~£!"~~~_ .. S~\!._ Additional notes 5·' k 21- a , Grain size class ~"'( -' ~1-\... v 0 \eCll1\ \c .. ~
~ I
~"' .. \<.. f-- I
~ r- I I-- I
I -- 0- t-- I 2 metres
I I ,
---.--.---.- - ... ~ -.-. ' _ . ... . ..
)
e-
PROJECT:
LOCATION
NTS map no. 5?. c..lr~
Geology map no 2~2.S
Airphoto no. '\5- ~S~lC-
UTM co-ord. fJ"IID8:. Ol{!:>~ s:t<:> (zone \S ) 5,{I(I, l!.So
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology ~\~
Shovel pit / Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness \S M-
Additional notes ~"'" s',k lS
--. OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED
FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
't-L- Db- 04]. COLLECTED BY: \\c~:sAN
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Topography M:2~U'.~~ ~1 ... ~II ~~~:) Classification
kH ,~!i!J~~ ~\,OI '~ Structure
e
DA TE: -::s.~ 30/0 b
SAMPLE MATERIAL
Sv'1r''-' ~~\ ~o;,~I\~ t J ,c~~~
d",~:\ -\.... ~ ..... :h .'~ S~~A~" \-:+ -1-~
Surficial material ~QC'~\ 5~~~c.&~li:~ 1\\ ~I~ E -cJ"'''':~+O; ~ \oo>.l\~w, eJ Sutt.t.D. N Clas ls
Size range _------l_~.9._~. __ __ ._ .. _._ ... Section/Sample Interval
I 1
I 1 ,
% of sample 4Q~i! ---- I o metres
, ~ 0- 0."-\ '"" '. ~..,~(" j\u",;'\ Shape s..,\,c.. ..... j')\~ _____ ... _ .. _. 6 "
f-f- -\i\\ I \:...:>u\~J I 0 f-0 Lithology 10 ~" ~~~_._. · .
~ & 6~7J.,\ -ul 0<.'-' i(.
I> • .:r ~1S! ~( ...... , .\.,\'~ 0 (J . I
O.~- 0·8_ '. ?v'1"Cl;"\ · . ~ -4)
D D ,
-' H\ I ~y- ~ ~(~y Matrix: · ~ L.l-
1 metre r-- ~'i-% of sample -_. btl']" ---... ----. -. .-. I
I f-0 . 80 ...... '. 100'10 Colour ~<':j-~'i \
f- I
f- o,....y \o.r w.+: .. "'0\: ...... ( I f- Grain size class ",,"" Sf»'o2.._.Go. .. .} . s\J~ ... __ .. 1 f- c\u.s, S \",~~ 4 \IIv I I : f- ~-\il'" - ~~IOl.~ ---.------~ .--~.--, .. . " ..
I-- I i
I-- ,
I 2 metres f-
1
.~ ----- - .- --~---.---.---.. -.- .. -~---. -- --.. . -. ' "
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _--"'O"-'-F---'t'-\...."""-..CAl..JO¥. .... s= _____ SAMPLE NO.: t:l- Ob-b\{~ COLLECTED BY: \\02:S)\1'-l
LOCATION
NTS map no.
Geology map no 1.~'l.S
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord ~;, 0,,-\:' ~~1-0
(zone \5) $'"\\''\ '5 ~B Ice distance to
E N
outcrop ___ S---'fV\.'-----'-N~ ____ _
Outcrop geology """,foe. )/O\CC\!I\I!:..
Shovel pit ___ ....>0/'---______ _
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. 08 thickness ____ \_)'11\'-"..:.... _____ _
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
Topography U,t\ .iu\ ... As"'J M'''\''''''' vc..\\~ ±o ~
Section/Sample Interval
o metres o -o,,,-\~·_ 51, .. :}c.-o.' .. 1
-h\\ ~ bo..> Up,,]
1 metre
Structure
Clasts
Size range
% of sample
Shape
Lithology
% of sample
Colour
DA TE: ~\)~ ~\ 10(., SAMPLE MATERIAL
\ ~ \0 ! _____ :..r.-~ _ _ · _ _ __ I ___ -----<;A.:...;:;O--"-=:...D ___________ 1
__ --'$"" .. L.;1\,-"'Q,"-'I\~~1 w-~ _______ -'- '-- i I
SO 1{7 , --.
---_._-
~o Ie> \ -----'-"----- - -
Additional notes lYI"'-[ s:.\c. 1~
6.~ M " \)Q~j ", .. ,Y\t..(
~~\ \00"/0 ~k
~O~~t~ ~:r~~ r~~~
--~~,j ._.!
Gr::~ize class ---':~"-""'-'~~ ~_~"-L_~ .. .:: I I I
2 metres -L..._-'--'
I I '--------------------'-----------------_._---- '------------_. __ ._--- - . . . . . . . ... . .
-. • • OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: COLLECTED BY: \\O'J.Sf\N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no, S1- C-\ \") Topography ~ L \,,±.~ J 1',HI6r.1Q"X cl Classification <,v~dQ,c.\ .... \ ,f,\\
Geology map no '2~2.S Structure Mv~I~, C4~~' f"\{..~~~
5v~~I:I(k.~ Airphoto no, '\S -l( S3\C- \~ -"1')
Surficial material s!)~r"cl"';"'\ -h\ \ <..>;~ -UTM co-ord , NI\!)8",} O~~I.I,~c~ E So ::10 ~'I<!~i:oil, Q.M~ s07Q ~I>-.L ~o..>\ k,~ (zone IS ) S,,\\g. 3c3, N ~l1a~Q~ ~!>. ~ ~1-t.U' $-,~.......,tf J Clasts I Ice distance to Size range \ ~$-~--.- .----. - -, \ outcrop 50 M ~ Section/Sample Interval I
% of sample ~0 70 ---------1 Outcrop geology ,w..%,- ,,0 \ca. .... "e.. o metres
1
- - °0 c- o- o.~"" ._ SJr"'S"r.; ... ' Shape -. S"\""'~_k.L--_ _____ i b c-
-\-) \\ I ~ lkj I
Shovel pit 'f) r-- Lithology \ko'lfQ ~l. Vf>'(~~~ _ _ . 1 ()
~ / () 0.'1-\.0 ..... '. Su'0\t..c.o.<..\ 4 o j"jaM, J,.,;.l Road cut oD :r
0
6" ~ 4-\\\ I ,.... ... ~,~ "'W"I.\L.!. Matrix:
. D ~ D fO 10 i
Other exposure I % of sample ----'-1
.-l 1 metre ().
-Est. 08 thickness 7k Colour ~I't- ~~-\o'~ ___ ____ 1 --
Additional notes '«20.{ 2"1.<.. .2.~ - Grain size class uQ.y~~~ ~~ .. ~ "' .. }. s~h __ . ____ -~ -----,.--~---.- .
I--r--
2 metres I--
I _ .. '--'~'.'- ' " .. . . .. .. .. . - .. " .
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _~DY..1....~~L.:...:.A.2.~E!:..--_____ SAMPLE NO.: "£\...-0(:,- eSo COLLECTED BY:_.!-'\\_D'l..::.:~:!!:A!.!.:N,,--__
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S2- c.l 1:!2 Topography t1"~l!o.~~ ... ~~~!\,~-~ Wr6"~ Classification Sl.l\.b~;"" -h\1 \-:. \~ .\.0 P
Geology map no. ~~l.S Structure tv'\£, !IS ! V< e\",~-\- ~vfF(.4L I i
~a~""4e~ t;;2~~c.:\;· Airphoto no. ~5 -'-\B~\c... \~~':\-~
Surficial material ~~~~ 512~("Q\"'c:. .. ~ b\\ t
UTM co-ord. ~1\08!' 0,\"3>,,\8<0$ E ~\-~ \"lIL\..,i ~I.l~~(~ I Q",,~i~~ ~~r~"\5 (zone lS ) S'-\I:] o-:r:! N s,,\'" "='" If J. Clasts . 1
Ice distance to Size range ~ .\0 \ o.~--"'C _ .... __ .. _. _ .... .
I outcrop :fO "'" S Section/Sample Interval
% of sample lot) 10 i
_ .. _- -- ..
Outcrop geology be.{..·£ ~a \e~,,!i;. o metres 0 0- o:!,,,,,,, '. ~",\,r"0\(.""~' Shape s~,,~\c..L-___ ... __ . r---• LJ r---
~\\ ~Q"\cla".~ I Shovel pit J 6 ~
~ ? 1 Lithology (,c Jo ~~ Vb\~"I_·_· __ 1 o [) V) 0
~o i:> ~<","';\.\o: ~ b. .,:p 0.:' -\oO'~M ~ ':,.>~,"!":" I
Road cut "A 0
I .J
j:;:). \,.1-h\\ ~u,,~~,,-l,. Matrix: r ! I Other exposure
1 metre r--- ''''''''\\w c\c..J.~ % of sample '4. 0 {o .-
Est. 08 thickness \,S (V\ - Colour YJIl.\\o...:>- ~"'k ~5'~~ --
Additional notes £":\ t~!<I) 1!J~Goo .. "V~ - Grain size class ~~~,;..". s~_.~,,-L<;:J~ _ _ \ c--of \C:J:jIV,) (Q"'1. A.O\,[ S \ ~ 18 ~ --- ---.- -
r-r I
I 2 metres r
I
_~_. _ __ • _ _ _ •• _ • • • ••• 0 •• ~_ ." .I
) )
• PROJECT:
OVERBURDEN DRILLlN~ANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
~_C)"""~..;...~,--,,,L:..L.'Au.:::¥;='t: _____ SAMPLE NO.: FL- Ob- OS\ COLLECTED BY: ~O"23'A.j
• n 1\ TC:: · -; I .... \ L.J,., I L- . ~V\~ ~\ 0"
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. ~1. c.1\"~ Topography t1~.k.rr.:.1.L..... !.l!:\~~c.~,=, Classification ~I,) 'o$~>(\"\ bB ~oA[cx.~ ~1oI!t." J
Geology map no. 2~2.S Structure ~(.o.ss \.;... I C~~!<! I c\"'1:\.\.
s"'''f Q ;4t Airphoto no. '\~ - L\ ?>~\ c.. \+-'1-$ '\
Surficial material ",'W' "" ,&r ... • \o.c <...1 .\\U UTM co-ord . rJ~081 o4.!:'S~o+ E W\~ I\",~:.\\ ~ ,\., > ~","~.~ ( ~O_'b (zone I!) ) 5'-11~ 140 N • 1..\ ,-~ 1,6 7" JIo. .J-i.j
... Clasts: ""
Ice distance to \,) , I
Size range J \.0 2.0 c. A:::
outcrop 5"", W Section/Sample Interval
% of sample (.0 10 Outcrop geology ~t4~ls. IID\c~is. o metres
I'D '-- o-~·l"" o~G<"';('~ Shape <;''''\''''''3 \w=
01' -'''''~ s.~n..j""~\ -\\.\ \
Shovel pit D ., - , lithology ~ol" ~ .. ~.~ "O~C2:"'L'"
c-- ~-"'I>"'\~'O'" ,
{:)
~ 401 ~ j""".\O~t / 0 -
Road cut • If)
!> 0 0 0.2,-0·5 ..... I '. ~V)
P .f) Matrix: 0
Other exposure 1 metre t:> j ~ .. ..,\~ .. ~ ')..>t(c..S ..... ~L\ % of sample \\1)'1'2
" ~
6 ~\\
Est. 08 thickness 7S"" -
Colour ~\~ - 0 ·$-\·1)"", '. S.l':...j't.c";,,.\ -
Additional notes t.&2:!! ~.~~ :2..~ - -\..:.\\ , +<:...,.<..r \".~ Grain size class ~'O h';"" c;,,,,,,} a...~ s\\\-r-'-- c\r..!>\., -c--
2 metres c--
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMiTED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: _----"'O....:....~-'--F-'\..>:::..A'_'_"=E=___ ____ SAMPLE NO.: ~\.- Ob~ c$2.. COLLECTED BY: \k":l..'$'BI'J DA TE: -:s..,\'(,1,\ 101e I
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. S?. '-I \~ Topography ~i)Jw·~X ~lu.\~:h1:"'\~ Classification S~~Q\..i, ... ~ -\\n s..JrQ~1c \O(<"\~J ~ ~ ,,~<-:: "'v [
Geology map no. 2. ~ 2.$ Structure ~~~ c~~<><-~ \ MC...~1it.. h c\!4..\- $"~e"'4
Airphoto no. ~S - ~Sb\'- ~-:t-1S
Surficial material ~\,;..". .:i';~r .... d~ ,;..~ 0.~l.. UTM co-ord . NI\D83> O~~b 2.-:f~ E
~~~\ ~~\ ~\ ~ ~~.L.C. I ,t-.c. .... ~ ~.rt,.~ ~ (zone '5 ) ~~q~ B27... N Clasts
Ice distance to Size range ~ ~ 1°c:~ '--outcrop 20M ~ Section/Sample Interval
% of sample '-\c io '--Outcrop geology ~h., "okl2'>~~' o metres
/)~ r-0-0.1-1"", ~v\'0\(,..<-';"'\ Shape ~u~"'0v\b.r
0
~ ,.J -k t( ( \Xj ('~e.c.\-
Shovel pit /' (j I.n Lithology &0 10 ~'<- \Jo\cy.M\~) 0
~JO . ..D 1.0 [0 tf......:.~.:~ 0
Road cut I)" I ..J
() V- Matrix I--
Other exposure 1 metre I-- % of sample btl 1, .--
Est. 08 thickness 7 I--I--
Colour 3~-\.,p~k 19 ~d -Additional notes NO''; ~',~ ~, ±\ ... ~ - Grain size class \fW'J s..~ <;,9: ...... "''''}. .;.\-\-Ovt
I -k>\\~'2.~.r s<:~i ",\ ~'" .- s~r~~~~ -h\ \ ,-- Ic?rls ~l:il\\ \uMf' 1 ,~!>~~ r-
I--
2 metres I--
• _ __ . __ •• __ • . . --.J
) )
• PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord. NI\\)~>
(zone \$ )
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. OB thickness
Additional notes
LOCATION
S1 ~\:,
2~lS
-. OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED
FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
• SAMPLE MATERIAL
Topography '"' ~.\, 1<) ;:;"J' Classification >\)'o\c.c~o-\ ~\~
OS¢",>!<M&J Wco('\;' 0 c; Structure Go ~~c.c..~ . ~f:!,~~'~ ! I
~~\t:. \0 dv:..~\: '\S-jS~k n-~'S
~'"'~t4~
Surficial m.aterial !'!~~i'~y\..c •• ~ ;h\l l ~-.:.~~~ o'\~~e\~ E o. .... ~ ~&+.:c. VO~e>.M!S. k5!~ b....s 5~USS~5" N Clasts:
Size range \ l,.., \ () c...rv--
5"" ~ Section/Sample Interval % of sample 60jo
~,,:~£. vQ\C"''''''L o metres
t;0 I-o -o,~""" '. Sv~c""j".c.\: .. J Shape s" \(.."6 \> 'u.s-
I- -\\\\ 1 b.,..,\~"") \ / 0
~ .-'I Lithology ].0 7:> M(e.~(, V.\CCoAAU- I . II)
J D t-\.. o.r \ i VV\
6 " ~ '!P 70 tjo..o..:, .Iso; ~ • !) ,
s"\'J\<-<":' \ f!L -' o·~- 0·1-,....,'. I.:> 0 V. Matrix: - -\1.\\ 4,070 - % of sample 1 metre --.
\.; bA I....-
Colour ~~·k\1-r--
~Il£ :>1 \,..a.... ~?. I- Grain size class l~ ~~ <;,w..~ ....... l ~~Jc ----
2 metres -
PROJECT:
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
DFf UW .. E SAMPLE NO.: ----~~~~----------
tL-06- c>s:\ COLLECTED BY: ~(YZ:3'AN
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY
NTS map no. Sl c.! \;' Topography ~V\ j.., \<"~"':::J Wr~'c. \..\\\~ ~~ Classification
Geology map no. 2:'25 Structure
Airphoto no. qs- ~B~\c... \1--:}5 SO~(-kJ..
Surficial material "" ~ V\\t!: I, \!w ... ~ ~"2~[~d~~b~
UTM co-ord. NAt>&:. Dy.:>1 ISS E b~~ I'''''':I~~ ~U~~~ ~!!"j~k!> ... l. S,1l [.k. .... (zone \5 ) S'i.lq c'.!>" N
(
Clasts:
Ice distance to Size range outcrop 5"", 5 Section/Sample Interval
% of sample Outcrop geology o metres
/,0 - 0-1:) .!. ...... '. OVS"'\t.S Shape A
C>o - ~ ..... ~ svroj ...... '\ -hI \ ) :r' Shovel pit 0
~ ill lithology
t:J 0 Q,-'-'.IIVI"i<M ,
" ~ 1...0 10 . ~ 0 Road cut ./ r2 C\o o:~- b.":\I-.·, s}"0~\
~ -'
Matrix Q;.e.b<;."- -Other exposure
1 metre ~ - -\\\\ I ,......,J..v'k s"~r'~J.. % of sample
Est. 08 thickness 03"" r-
r-b·-:}_ \ ~.}fO<..\:. - Colour
r- M.o<,tt<. V()\~;(..
DA TE: :J",\'0 ~\ I ole.
SAMPLE MATERIAL
su~i ... \ -b\\
,.-IP...3!~IU<. I ,~~..l, I H( .... :~i.&
~ ~ \0 c.~
I to Io I
-----
s..,~y\~ I
B~J':> f'VV-..J-L \J\)\q... .... ~1 efQM·\.\o;~
1010
~~-~a\~b
Additional notes 1NlW' :!',4 '3,<'; \JoV~ \-11.+u I-- Grain size class \jt ('0 .£;H4.. x.. .... J c......~ s;.~~ 4:\\\ IV. ~ eMu:
r-r- .. _-------_ .-f--t--
2 metres r--
______ ----1
• PROJECT:
NTS map no.
Geology map no.
Airphoto no.
UTM co-ord. t.)"~l.
(zone~_)
Ice distance to
outcrop
Outcrop geology
Shovel pit
Road cut
Other exposure
Est. OB thickness
Additional notes
OVERBURDEN DRILLlN1tANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
• __ O-.!~....!.-'L=-A..u::\(;,...E _____ SAMPLE NO,: 'f\.-Oe:,-b55 COLLECTED BY: ~O-.yAN
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
5.?. cl r~ Topography £~~ , l.l"~\c.~~ ~f2(.~ Classification su \'clC<.'''\ ~\\
t~~~ 1125 Structure ~c..s<::, lIS< t c~ ~c. c~ I
~5-l{~~\c... ~-:t-3:S
cl.c...~\.- ~lo!~{4~
Surficial material ~\"'''''' ~\1..d"'I~~ 1\\ ~~ ~'-\"'!,:r S~b E ",..Ac..r~~ s~!~ ~'V\ N Clasts
Size range \ ~ ~~ ~-------- \ -;,~ N Section/Sample Interval
% of sample +() JR \ ~.(. l.!1)\CA~~<- a metres
~vrr .. jo<:;"" I "J= 0-0-5...- " Shape $u~~~ ,
!-- .- I u >-- {\\\ ~""'~'-~ fo.. ... 14. I I':;
o!-- I Lithology 1-0 r" ~ \I*q,M~'-1 I - S ....... ~,~ I c.< .... ~ """"-h.L "
.{) _ f- 30 7~ ~"""';\.\oi~
I V ~ v
~ \1- \Co. '" '-l L:.o v \ ok, ) "-- v,
of) In Matrix: D 0, OS - Vz",- " ~)"jk.~\ ., I % of sample ~k 1 metre ~, -D -_._,._- --
0 -Ii\( l..k~ ~r1 d"'l>+
~ I
2tf\ 0t;:; \C Colour _ _ ~!1.l - 0<;'\1"<. ~
~c,..:\&~ r-
'~"'ll ~.~~ 1~ ,--- Grain size class ~.;..... ~~ tM...l ~~ \.-\-- -- I -
I :--
- I 2 metres -
__ _ _ ._~ ____ _ • • _ __ _ ~ . . _J
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED FIELD PIT SAMPLING LOG
PROJECT: D~~ l~~~ SAMPLE NO.: --~~~~~----------
~l- D~' DS!" COLLECTED BY.' \\O~~N
LOCATION SURFICIAL GEOLOGY SAMPLE MATERIAL
NTS map no. 51 clr~:J Topography b.J[CI'k;. \.-.;\\ ~~ Classification S\l\'0\toG\~ \ -b \ \
Geology map no. ~Z.S Structure M~~::'I~ ~<>-G~ t c~t.o.. ~± (
~ ML..'\""~ .N(fbM Airphoto no "S-4~~\ c.. r::}- "fS
Surficial material ~\II\Or ~{~~C.~\:' \ ~\~ ~[R"~
) UTM co-ord. fo)A~8> ()~n Sb~ E ~~~~ ~!O~S. (zone \$ ) s"\ \5. ll, \1- N Clasts , Ice distance to Size range ~ ~ 1. D c.~ _____ 1
outcrop ~"'" N Section/Sample Interval % of sample So 10 __ ____ I
Outcrop geology ~(A~(. ~"\Q?~i~ o metres I o c.) 0- o. (.}o<. '. <;"~,,,, 0~('\<4' Shape S')\'GV\Ju \"'( fj - ---.
~ ~ ~\'1 "";)h/"~J L /)1> II')
Shovel pit D lithology BCl lS! ~ .... \)0 \<:o..v.'~ ~ 96 0 \:.. ... \~"J a:u~ :::;"""'\ \<>;~
I
D~ ~ Road cut 0·2..-0·(.,....·. S\1\:)\«';"\ - Matrix: - ~\\, Lt.!>,> ~\~'J 50 )Q Other exposure 1 metre - % of sample '--
Est. 08 thickness O.b M I--
O.b ...... '. ~n(.'<..- Colour \j\l fW - 0 c-\t L l-
I-- ~~'<. \/0\ .... "'\(.. Additional notes si\{ e>.-\. -1'k ~J. 0"- I-- Grain size class ~~M.. __ ..
~il~~ 00.1 M :tr"I!l~~ ~~ "...,:,± I--- --- ------ --- ---
2 metres -
------'
)
•
•
•
Appendix B
Heavy Mineral Processing Weights and Physical Characteristics of the Till Samples
Bulk Table +2.0 mm Table Total lights Total Non Mag CLASS Rec'd Spill Clasts Feed SD CY
FL-06-01 13.0 12.2 5.0 7.2 203.9 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL FL-06-02 13.1 12.3 2.7 9.6 384.5 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL FL-06-03 8.3 7.5 2.0 5.5 250.8 NA 100 0 0 0 U ... Y N LOC LOC TILL FL-06-04 10.7 9.9 2.2 7.7 270.6 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOG TILL FL-06-05 12.5 11.7 2.6 9.1 399.2 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL FL-06-06 11.1 10.3 2.0 8.3 292.1 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOG TILL Fl-06-07 11.4 10.6 3.7 6.9 283.2 NA 100 0 0 0 U ... Y N LOC LOC TILL FL-06-08 9.9 9.1 1.9 7.2 235.2 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL FL-06-09 13.2 12.4 4.0 8.4 342.7 NA 100 0 0 0 U ... Y N LOC LOC TilL FL-06-1Q 12.0 11.2 1.9 9.3 322.9 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL FL-06-11 11.6 10.8 La 9.2 177.7 NA 100 0 0 0 U Y Y N LOG LOC TILL FL-06-12 11.5 10.7 3.5 7.2 279.3 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N MOG MOC TILL FL-06-13 9.9 9.1 2.0 7.1 279.0 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N MOC MOC TILL FL-06-14 11.8 11.0 3.2 7.8 3720 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOG TILL FL-06-15 10.6 9.8 1.6 8.2 350.7 NA 100 0 0 0 U ... Y N LOG LOG TILL
FL-06-16 11.7 10.9 1.8 9.1 304.2 NA 100 0 0 0 U ... Y N LOG LOC TILL
FL-06-17 11.0 10.2 2.3 7.9 343.7 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N MOG MOC TILL
FL-06-18 12.6 11.8 2.8 9.0 394.5 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-19 11.9 11.1 3.8 7.3 287.1 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-20 11.5 10.7 3.9 6.8 318.5 NA 100 0 0 0 U + Y N MOC MOC TILL
FL-06-21 12.8 12.0 3.8 8.2 375.5 NA P 100 Tr 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-22 12.3 11.5 3.4 8.1 418.9 NA P 100 Tr 0 0 U ... Y N BE LOC TILL
FL-06-23 9.9 9.1 1.6 7.5 412.6 NA G 100 Tr 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOG TILL
FL-06-24 10.5 9.7 2.0 7.7 299.6 NA C 95 5 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOG TilL
FL-06-25 10.1 9.3 1.4 7.9 361.9 NA C 100 Tr 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOG TILL
Fl-06-26 10.9 10.1 1.3 8.8 397.1 NA C 95 5 0 0 U + Y N MOG MOG TILL
FL-06-27 12.7 11.9 4.8 7.1 347.7 NA P 95 5 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-28 13.5 12.7 5.3 7.4 321.9 NA P 100 Tr 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-29 12.1 11.3 2.0 9.3 342.9 NA P 100 Tr 0 0 U + Y N LOG LOC TILL
FL-06-30 10.5 9.7 1.5 8.2 201.2 NA 95 5 0 0 IJ + Y N LOG LOG TILL
FL-06-31 10.1 9.3 1.0 8.3 134.9 NA 95 5 0 0 U Y + N LOG LOC TILL
11.4 10.6 51 5.5 253.6 NA 100 Tr 0 0 \J + Y N LOC LOC TILL
12.0 11.2 0.8 10.4 246.3 NA 30 70 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL
10.6 9.8 0.8 9.0 197.0 NA 30 70 0 0 U + Y N LOC LOC TILL
12.4 11.6 0.2 11.4 102.1 NA 40 60 0 0 U Y '( Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-36 13.0 12.2 :2.0 10.2 197.5 NA P 30 70 0 0 U Y Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-37 10.7 9.9 1.2 8.7 113.1 NA P 20 80 0 0 U Y + Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-38 11.3 10.5 1.0 9.5 194.8 NA P 20 80 0 0 U Y Y N MOC MOe TilL
FL-06-39 10.9 10.1 1.2 8.9 138.6 NA P 20 80 0 0 1I Y .. Y N Moe MOC TILL
Fl-06-40 12.7 11,9 1.5 10.4 204.5 NA P 10 90 0 0 1I Y Y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-41 11.6 10.8 0.7 10.1 170.2 NA P 30 70 0 0 LI ... Y N lOC LOC TILL
FL-06-42 11.8 11.0 1.0 10.0 225.9 NA P 20 80 0 0 1I + Y N Loe BE TILL
FL-06-43 8.2 7.4 1.5 5.9 149.3 NA P 100 0 0 0 u + '( N MOC Moe TILL
FL-06-44 13.5 12.7 4.5 8.2 480.4 NA P 85 15 0 0 u + y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-45 10.9 10.1 0.7 9.4 115.2 NA P 30 70 0 0 u y + N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-46 13.5 12.7 2.0 10.7 461.7 NA P 30 70 0 0 u + y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-47 12.2 11.4 1.6 9.8 243.2 NA P 40 60 0 0 u + y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-48 11.3 10.5 1.1 9.4 161.0 NA P 30 70 0 0 u ... y N LOG LOC TILL
FL-06-49 12.4 11.6 1.8 9.8 205.3 NA P 40 60 0 0 u + y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-S0 12.0 11.2 3 .. 0 8.2 310.3 NA P 20 80 0 0 u + y N LOG Loe TILL
FL-06-51 13.0 12.2 2.1 10.1 336.0 NA P 30 70 0 0 u + y N loe Loe TILL
FL-06-52 12.0 11.2 1.0 10.2 286.0 NA P 70 30 0 0 u y y y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-53 11.8 11.0 1.4 9.6 225.3 NA P 40 60 0 0 u + y N LOG LOC TILL
FL-06-54 11.0 10.2 0.8 9.4 243.1 NA P 30 70 0 0 u y y y N LOC LOC TILL
FL-06-55 13.4 12.6 3.6 9.0 240.5 NA G 70 30 0 .) u + y N LOG LOC TILL
FL-06-56 10.8 10.0 1.2 8.8 207.9 NA P 70 30 0 0 u + y N LOG LOC TILL
FL-06-57 11.3 10,5 2.2 8.3 288.9 NA G 20 80 0 I) u + y N LOG lOC TILL
FL-06-58 13.4 12.6 4.4 8.2 334.5 NA G 40 60 0 0 u + N LOC LOC SANDY TILL
10.2 9.4 1.1 P 60 40 0 U + Y N
•
•
•
•
Appendix C
Gold Grain Summary, Descriptions and Calculated Visible Gold Values for the Nonferromagnetic Heavy Mineral Fraction of tbe Till Samples
•
•
•
Sample Number
FL-06-01 FL-06-02 FL-06-03 FL-06-04 FL-06-05 FL-06-06 FL-06-07 FL-06-08 FL-06-09 FL-06-10 FL-06-!1 FL-06-12 FL-06-13 FL-06-14 FL-06-J5 FL-06-16 FL-06 .. 17 FL-06-18 FL-06·19 FL-06-20 FL-06-21 FL-06-22 FL-06-23 FL-06-24 FL-06-2S FL-06-26 FL-06-27 FL-06-28 FL-06-29 FL-06-30 FL-06-.3J FL-06-32 FL-06-33 FL-06-34 FL-06-35 FL-06-36 FL-06-37 FL-06-38 FL-06-39 FL-06-40 FL-06-'1 FL-06-42 FL-06-43 FL-06-44 FL-06-45 FL-06-46 FL-06-47 FL-06-48 FL-06-49 FL-06-50 FL-06-S1 FL-06-52 FL-06-53 FL-06-S4 FL-06-55 FL-06-56 FL-06-57 FL-06-58 FL-06-59
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED GOLD GRAIN SUMMARY SHEET
Number of Visible Gold Grains ~onmag __ ~C~a~lc~u~la~re~d~P_~P~B_V~i~si~b~le~G~o~ld~I~'n~H~~~1~C __ _ HMC
Total Resbaped Modified Pristine Weight (g) Total Reshaped Modified Pristine
7
20 14 24 II 24 53 5 5
20 2 8
16 10 4 7 12 5 6
5 26 35 16 10 10 3
23 35 10 7 10 30 22 23 7 14 7
22 9 5 5
23 3 8 8
28 16 41 34 40 53 4 24 17 11 38 35
2 3 3 JI 5 5
15
4 15 2 5 o 13 7 .3 5 6
o 4 1 2 13 31 8 10 5
6 16 7 6 3 10 3 10 2 7 4 10 4 3
3
1
5 lO 11 26 4 16 28 3 6 10 9 12 6
3 9 J 3 2 2
23 1 (}
4 o 3 o 3 3 1 2 6 3 I o I 5 2 8 ()
o o 5 5
4 7
4 2 3
6 2 o o
o 4 I 6 4 12 14 7 10 I 8 4 I II 13
2 8 10 10
4 17 15 3
o o
o o o o o 2 1 o 2 8 2 o o 5 2 12 14 2 o 3 13 18 9 3 4 2 6 3 2 4 19 2 3 2 12 I 3 16 17 IS o 10 3
IS 16
28.8 38.4 22
30.8 36.4 33.2 27.6 28.8 33.6 37.2 36.8 28.8 28.4 31.2 32.8 36.4 31.6
36.08 29.2 27.2 32.8 32.4 30
30.8 31.6 35.2 28.4 29.6 37.2 32.8 33.2 22
41.6 36
45.6 40.8 34.8 38
35.6 41.6 40.4 40
23.6 32.8 37.6 42.8 39.2 37.6 39.2 32.8 40.4 40.8 38.4 37.6
36 35.2 33.2 32.8 33.2
13 137 41 76
481 43
435 9
1150 106 6 15 <I 36 140
5 3 10
10
7 639 718 35 II 26 43 86
444 90
276 47 157 61
112 755 17 77
234 29 38 15
129 I
23 24 117 39
237 352 100 ]02 3 89 124 38 524 49
8 108 34 65
467 17
198 7
1147 95 6 8 o
33 139
1 2 2 o 10 I 2
622 716 32 11 19 34 47 209 83
275 23 103 39 98 741 14 7
116 12 37 3
45 I 4 22 77 26 85 7
64 79 3
50 114 27 256 19
2 17 <1 2 3 1
202 <I o 6
o 7 o 3
<1 3
6 <1 o 1
10 2 3 o o o 9
82 6 I
22 23
7 II
10 100 5 o o
o 11 I
21 12 38 15 16 15 <1 16 9
<I 21 16
4 12 7 10 12 25 35 2 2 5 o o
<I o o o o o 4
<\
o 5 8 I
o o 7 9
29 153
o 3
30 22 7 4 I
59 18 12 I
11 83 <I 7 1
19 I
1\5 330 19 8 o
23 1 II
247 14
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED DETAILED GOLD GRAIN SHEET
Nonmag Calculated Sample Panned Dimensions (microns) Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC V.G.Assay Remarks
Nomber Yes/No Wei2ht inHMC Thickness Width Length Reshaped Mrnlllied Pristine Toni (g)
FL-06-01 No 3 e 15 15 I 5 e 25 25 2 4 8 e 25 50
10 C 50 50
FL-06-02 Yes 4 C 15 25 2 3 No sulphides. 5 C 25 25 2 3 6 8 C 25 50 5 2 7
JOe 50 50 I 2 I3C 50 75 I 50 M 75 125 I
20 38.4 137
FL-06-03 Yes 3 C 15 15 6 7 No sulphides. 4 C 15 25 3 3 5 C 25 25 8 C 25 50 2
15 C 50 100
FL-06-04 Yes 3 C 15 15 2 2 No sulphides. 4C 15 25 1 2 3 5 C 25 25 2 2 4 8 8 C 25 50 3 2 5
10 C 50 50 3 3 13 C SO 75 3
76
eFL-06-05 No 4 C 15 25 2 grains electrum. 5 C 25 25 3 8 C 25 50 I
JO C 50 50 2 3 J3C 50 75 1 50 M 75 125 1 75 M 125 175
481
FL-06-06 Yes 3 C 15 15 2 No sulphides. 4 C 15 25 5 6 5 C 25 25 6 7 8 C 25 50 2 3 5
10 C 50 50 2 2
FL-06-07 Yes 3 C 15 15 I 2 No sulphides. 5 C 25 25 2 5 7 14
8 C 25 50 5 10 5 20 10 C 25 75 2 2 10 C 50 50 2 2 4
13 C 50 75 4 3 7 18 C 50 125 2 22C 75 150 2
.53 27.6 435
FL-06-08 No 4 C 15 25 1 2 5 C 25 25 2 2
10 e 50 50 5 28.8 9
eL-06-09 No 8 C 2S 50 10 C 50 50 3 3
100 M 200 250
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED DETAILED GOLD GRAIN SHEF,T
Nonmag Calculated Sample Panned Dimensions (microns) Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC V.G.Assay Remarks
Number YeslNo Weight inHMC
e FL-06-JO
Thickness Width Length Reshaped Modifted Pristine Total (g) (ppb)
Yes 3 e 15 15 3 3 No sulphides. 4 e 15 25 2 2 5 e 25 25 7 2 9 8 e 25 50 I 2 3
JOe 50 50 13 C 50 75 50 M 75 JOO I
20 37.2 ]06
FL-06-11 No 5 C 25 25 10 C 50 50
FL-06-12 No 5 C 25 25 3 I 4 8 e 25 50 2 2
FL-06-J3 No 3 C 15 15 28.4 <I
FL-06-14 Yes 3 C 15 15 2 3 No sulphides.
4 C 15 25 I I 5 e 25 25 7 7 8 C 25 50 2
JOe 25 75 10 C 50 50 I3C 50 7S
eFL-06-15 No 3 C 15 J 5 2 2 4 5 C 25 25 2 3
13 C 50 75 2 2 50 M 100 100 J
FL-06-16 No 3 C 15 15 I 4 C 15 25 1 5 C 25 25 2 2
4 36.4 2
FL-06-17 No 3 C 15 15 3 3 5 C 25 25 2 3 8 C 25 50
FL-06-18 No 3 e 15 15 4 4 8 4 e 15 25 2 2 5 C 20 25 2 2
12 36.1 3
FL-06-19 No 5 C 25 25 2 8 C 25 50 2
FL-06-20 No 2 C JO 10 2 4 8 C 25 50 1
10 e 25 75 6 27.2 10
FL-06-21 No 5 C 25 25
.L-06-22 No 5 C 25 25 2 3 8 C 25 50 2 2
5 32.4 7
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMEJ'l/T LIMITED DETAILED GOLD GRAIN SHEET
Nonmal: Calculated Sample Panned Dimensions (microns) Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC V.G. Assay Remarks
Number YeslNo Weight inHMC
• FL-06-31
Thickness Width Length Reshaped Modified Pristine Total (g) (EEb)
No 4 C 15 25 5 e 25 25 8 e 25 50 I
lOe 50 50 2 3 13 e 50 75 I IS e 50 100 I IS e 75 75 2 2
10 33.2 90
FL-06-32 No 5 e 25 25 2 8 e 25 50
10 e 50 50 13 e 50 75 IS e 75 75 50 M 100 125
7 22.0 276
FL-06-33 No 3 e 15 15 5 e 25 25 I 8 e 25 50 2 3
lOe 50 50 I 13 e 50 75 2 2 4
10 41.6 47
FL-06-34 Yes 3 e IS IS 2 2 I grain electrum.
4 e IS 25 2 2 5 e 25 25 I 2 3 8 e 25 50 2 3 3 8
10 e 25 75 3 4
• l3e 25 100 I I
10 e 50 50 4 2 7 13 e 50 75 I 18 e 75 100 2 2
30 36.0 157
FL-06-35 No 3 e IS 15 6 6 4 e IS 25 6 6 5 e 25 25 3 4 8 e 25 50 2 3
10 e 50 50 IS e 50 100 20 e 75 125 I
22 45.6 61
FL-06-36 Yes 3 e IS IS 2 grains electrum.
4 e IS 25 I 5 e 25 25 5 6 8 e 25 50 I 3 2 6
10 e 50 50 2 2 l3e 50 75 5 5 IS C 50 100 18 C 75 100
23 40.8 112
FL-06-37 No 4 C IS 25 I I grain electrum.
5 C 25 25 2 2 8 C 25 50 J
13 e 50 75 2 75 M 175 250
7 34.8 755
eL-06-38 No 2 C 10 10 3 4 e IS 25 2 3 5 e 25 25 2 2 5 8 C 25 50 I
10 C 50 50 2 2 14 38.0 17
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED DET AILED GOLD GRAIN SHEET
Nonmag Calculated Sample Panned Dimensions (microns) Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC V.G. Assay Remarks
Number YeslNo Weight inHMC
e FL-06-39
'Thickness Width Length Reshaped Modified Pristine Total (g) (ppb)
No 3 C 15 15 I 2 5 e 25 25 2 2
lOe 50 50 13 e 50 75 50 M 75 75
FL-06-40 Yes 3 e 15 15 No sulphides. 5 C 25 25 4 5 8 e 25 50 2 3
JOC 25 75 2 2 10 e 50 50 3 5 13 e 50 75 15 e 75 75 2 3 50 M 75 100
22 41.6
FL-06-41 No 5 e 25 25 3 1 grain electrum.
8 e 25 50 2 10 C 25 75 10 C 50 50 2 l3e 50 75 I
9 40.4 29
FL-06-42 No 4 C 15 25 5 C 25 25 8 C 25 50
l3e 50 75 18 e 75 100
eFL-06-43
5 40.0 38
No 5 e 25 25 3 3 8 e 25 50
10 e 50 50 I 5 23.6 15
FL-06-44 Yes 4 e 15 25 I I No sulphides.
5 e 25 25 5 6 8 e 25 50 4 5
10 C 25 75 3 3
10 C 50 50 3 3
13 e 50 75 3 4 18 e 75 100 I
23 32.8 129
FL-06-45 No 3 e 15 15 2 2 5 C 25 25 I
3 37.6
FL-06-46 No 4 e 15 25 5 C 25 25 I 8 C 25 50 I 2
JOe 50 50 2
FL-06-47 No 4C 15 25 5 C 25 25 3 8 C 25 50
10 e 50 50 2 2 13C 50 75
•
OVERBURDEN DRILLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED DETAILED GOLD GRAIN SHEI:T
Nonmag Calculated Sample Panned Dimensions (microns) Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC V.G.Assay Remarks Number YeslNo Weight inHMC
• FL-06-48
Thickness Width Length Reshaped Modified Pristine Total (g) (~lM
No 3 e 15 15 2 3 5 e 25 25 1 5 6 8 e 25 50 2 5 7
IOC 50 50 I 4 I 6 I3C 50 75 5 5 15 C 50 100
[[7
FL-06-49 No 3 C 15 15 2 4 C [5 25 5 C 25 25 6 7 8 e 25 50 3 4
13 C SO 75 1 15 C 75 75 I
16 39.2 39
FL-06-50 Yes 3 e 15 IS I 2 2 5 No sulphides. 4e 15 25 3 3 5 C 25 25 9 3 12 8 e 25 50 8 5 13
l3e 50 75 4 2 6 Be 50 75 I 50 M 75 125
41 32.8 237
FL-06-S1 Yes 2 C 10 10 2 2 No sulphides.
4 C 15 25 2 7 9 5 C 25 25 3 6 3 12 8 C 25 50 3 4 7
• 10 e 50 50 3 75 M 125 175 I
34 40.4 352
FL-06-52 Yes 2 e 10 10 3 4 No sulphides.
4 e 15 25 2 7 9 5 e 25 25 3 I 3 7 8 e 25 SO 6 3 3 12
lOe 50 50 2 2 4 l3e 50 75 I 2 15 e 75 75 2 2
40 40.8 100
FL-06-53 Yes 2 e 10 10 1 I 4 6 No sulphides. 4 C 15 25 5 2 6 13 5 C 25 25 11 4 3 18
8 e 25 50 7 1 2 10 10 C 50 50 2 3 15 e 50 100 I 15 C 75 75 2 2
53 38.4 102
FL-06-54 No 3 e 15 15 4 e 15 25 5 C 25 25 8 C 25 50
4 37.6 3
FL-06-55 Yes 2 C 10 to No sulphides. 4 C 15 25 3 2 5 5 C 25 25 3 2 5 8e 25 50 4 2 7 • 10 e 50 50 I 3 5
20 C 50 150
OVERBURDEN DRJLLING MANAGEMENT LIMITED DETAILED GOLD GRAIN SHEET
Nonmag Calculated Sample Panned Dimensions (microns) Number of Visible Gold Grains HMC V.G. Assay Remarks
Number YeslNo Weight inHMC
eFL-06-56
Thickness Width Length Reshaped Modified Pristine Totl) (g) (ppb)
Yes 3 e 15 15 3 2 5 No sulphides. 5 e 25 25 1 2 4 8 e 2S 50 I 2
JOe 50 50 2 3 13 e 50 75 50 M 50 100 18 e 75 100
FL-06-57 No 4 C IS 25 I Duplicate 5 C 25 25 3 3 of No. 14 8 C 25 50 3 3
10 e 50 50 3 3 13 C 50 75
39
FL-06-58 Yes 2 C 10 10 2 2 No sulphides.
Duplicate 4 C 15 25 I 3 2 6 of No. 44 5 C 25 25 3 2 2 7
8 e 25 50 3 5 4 12 10 C 50 50 3 13 C 50 75 2 15 C 75 75 2 3 18 e 75 JOO I 50 M 100 150
FL-06-59 Yes 2 C 10 10 No sulphides.
Duplicate 4 C 15 25 5 7 13
eOfNO.56 5 C 25 25 4 6 10 8 C 25 50 3 2 3 8
10 C 50 50 2 3 35 33.2 49
e
•
• Appendix D
Geochemical Analyses for the -0.063 mm Clay/Silt Fraction
•
• Element
Unit
Detection Limit
Analysis Method
FL06-01
Standard I
FL06-02
FL06-03
FL06-04
FL06-05
FI.06-06
FL06-07
FL06-08
FL06-09
FL06-1O
FL06-11
FL06-12
FL06-13
FL06-14
Duplicate of FL06-14
FL06-15
FL06-16
FL06-17
FL06-18
FL06-19
FL06-20
Fu)6-2!
FL06-12
Fl.06-23
FL06-24
FL06-25
Standard 2
FL06-26
FL06-27
FL06-28
FL06-29
FL06-30
Au Ag As Sa Dr Ca Co Cr Cs
ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm % ppm ppm ppm
2 5 0.5 50 0.5 5 I
INA INA INA INA INA INA INA INA INA
2 2.6 3RO 1.7 < I 15 98 2
2 < 5 5.5 500 .5 < I 24 62 4
9
12
<2
9
16
<2
2
2
24
2
4
2
2
4
6
11
7
4
2
4
4
7
6
12
<2
.5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
.5
5
5
<5
<5
<5
<5
.5
.5
<5
<5
<5
<5
5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
1.7
6.2
3,5
\.4
3.\
5.3
3.2
7,2
2,5
2.5
),7
2,2
2
2,5
1.9
1.7
3
2.8
'" L,O
0.8
1.3
2,2
2.1
6.3
1.9
2,7
6,2
2.3
1.7
330
< 50
\20
2.3
2,2
370 <0.5
410 <0.5
280
370
3.5
330 < 0.5
370
450
310
280
440
320
300
250
390
270
1.9
2
3.1
3
\.4
2.1
2.7
1.8
1.9
1.5
390 < 0.5
270 2.3
410 3
290 1.1
390 < \l.~
320
380
500
480
410
310
2,g
2.1
5.8
2.5
1.8
2,8
330 < 0,5
440 2,1
2
< I
" I
< I
"
<:
2
2
3
2
<I
<1
1
< I
2
<: 1
2
<
< 1
15
36
16
19
13
17
22
15
12
13
13
10
12
14
13
9
13
22
IJ
27
12
t1
23
12
II
14
12
10
95
169
116
86
107
119
222
91
80
95
332
74
85
lOS
95
85
74
67
71
6\
55
103
64
87
84
57
89
98
71
78
68
3
<: I
2
<: 1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
< I
2
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
2
2
3
• Fe Hf Hg Ir Mil
% ppm ppm ppb ppm
0.01 I 5
INA INA INA INA INA
3.32 3 < 1 <.5
3.61 9 < 1 <: 5 7
3.79
6.42
3,79
3.27
3.21
3.94
4.14
3.1
2.53
3.01
4,82
3,()1
2.36
2,78
3.18
2.68
2.38
2.39
2.61
,88
2.54
3.4
1.53
2.74
2.36
3.49
2.58
2.62
3,15
2.84
2,57
2
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
3
4
6
2
6
4
4
<)
4
5
<
<I
<I
< \
< I
<I
<
<
< I
<
<
<: I
< 1
< 1
< 1
<1
< I
<I
<1
<' 1
<
<
<.
< I
< 1
< 1
<I
< 1
< I
< 1
<. I
<5
<5
<5
<s <.5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
5
<5
<5
<5
<5
5
<5
<5
<1
<: 1
<1
< I
< I
<I
< 1
I
2
22
2
2
< I
< I
<1
<. I
1
<. I
3
<:
I
I
3
<.1
< I
4
• Na NI Rb Sb Sc Se Sn Sr 'fa 'fb
% ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % % ppm ppm
0.01
INA
20 15 0.1 0.1 3 (1.02 0.05 \l.5 \l.2
INA INA INA INA INA INA INA INA tNA
1.48
1.47
< 20 < 15 0,2 1l.8 < 3 < 0,02 0.05 < 0.5 2.8
< 20 73 0.5 14.8 < 3 0.02 0,05 1.4 6.5
1.57 20 45 0.2 15,5
0.91
1.59
1.97
1.88
<20 < 15 <0.1 25.7
< 20 < 15 0.2 14,8
20
20
60 < 0,1
49 <0.1
10,6
lOA
1.37 20 34
49
0.3 10.8
1.29
1.78
1.99
1.81
1.41
1.3
1.75
1.85
!.8
1.68
1.52
1.85
<: 20 0.4 14.2
< 20 <: 15 0.3
< 20 <: 15 < 0.1
10.8
9.4
10,9 < 20
<20
76 < 0.1
51
<.20 <.15
20
20
< 20
< 20
<.20
43
62
43
58
56
0.4 15.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
9,7
'1.4
9,8
OJ 12,1
0.3 10,7
0.3 8.9
< 20 < 15 < 0.1 li9
1.62 <: 20 52 0,2 91
1.27 <20 -<...i5 0.4 22. i
1.4 <20 37 0.3 8,5
1.43
1.22
1.55
1.51
<20 <15 <0.1 15,1
8 <.20
120
20
61
72
65
0,3
0.2
0,3 10.1
1.42 20 60 0.5 14.2
UI < 20 86 < 0,1 9
1.73 <.20 < 15 0,3 9,2
1.38 < 20 51
45
0.2 9,1
1.54
1.48
< 20
< 20
0.3 10.3
43 < 0.1 10
< 3 < 0.02 0,05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 0,05 <.05
< 3 <.0.02 0,05 05
<. 3 < 0.Q2 0,05 0.5
< 3 < (l,02 < 0,05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0,02 0,05 <.0.5
< 3 <. 0.02 < 0,05 <. 0.5
< 3 0.02 0.05 <. 0.5
3 < 0,02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 0.02 <. 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 " 0.02 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0,02 <'0.05 <.0.5
'" 0.02 < 0.05 <.0.5
<. 3 0,02 <. 0.05 < 0,5
< 3 < 0,02 < 0.05 1.5
3 0.02 0,05 <: 0.5
<. 3 0,02 <.0,05 <. 05
< 3 0,02 r: 0.05 <: 0.5
0,02 <. 0,05 <. 0,5
< 3 0,02 < 0.05 < 0.5
<. :l 0.02 0,05 1.1
<. 3 0.02 <.0.05 < 0.5
<. 3 0,02 < 0,05 < 0,5
0.02 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 <.0.02 0,05 <.0.5
< 0,02 <: 0,05 <.0.5
3 < 0.02 <'0,05 <'0,5
< 3 0.02 0.05 < 0.5
3 0.02 <. 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0,02 < 0,05 < 0,5
25
1.5
3.1
1.8
2.2
2.6
2,6
3.2
2,2
2.5
2.5
3
2.4
2.8
4
3.3
2
2
2.3
2.5
3.9
3.8
2.4
2.7
6.1
3.5
2.3
2.8
2.7
• Element
Unit
Detection Limit
Analysis Method
FL06·31
FL06-32
FL06-33
FL06-34
FL06-35
FL06-36
FL06-37
FL06-38
FL06-39
FL06-40
FL06-41
FL06-42
FL06-43
FL06-44
Duplicate of FL06-44
FL06-45
FL06-46
FL06-47
FL06-48
FL06-49
FL06-50
FL06-51
Standard 3
FL06-52
FL06-53
FL06-54
FL06-55
FL06-56
Duplicate of FL06-56
Au Ag As
ppb ppm ppm
5 0.5
INA INA INA
< 2 < 5 1.8
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
<2
9
14
26
33
<2
<2
<2
25
6
<2
6
14
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<.5
<5
<5
<5
<.5
<5
<5
<5
<5
3.1
1.6
1.1
2.2
1.9
2.6
3.1
2.8
2.4
2.3
2.1
7.7
6.1
7.6
2.8
5.4
3.7
2.1
2.R
2.3
3.2
6.3
3.4
:\.2
2.7
3.3
4.3
Ba Br Ca Co Cr Cs
ppm
50
INA
ppm % ppm ppm ppm
0.5 5
INA INA INA INA INA
340
360
1.2 < I II 82 2
1.6
470 < 0.5
360 < 0.5
430 < 0.5
360 < 0.5
450 < 0.5
550 < 0.5
540
450
540
1.9
1.8
2.5
450 < 0.5
280
480
370
18
3.6
3.8
360 < 0.5
400
380
240
8.9
1.8
1.6
350 < 0.5
350
430
620
2.6
6
360 < 0.5
370 < 0.5
370
210
1.7
1.6
320 < 0.5
270 3.2
2
<I
2
< 1
<I
2
<I
< I
< I
< I
2
2
2
2
2
< I
2
<I
15
10
II
13
17
13
12
12
II
10
7
25
26
14
14
16
14
16
18
22
26
15
20
16
19
17
18
70
79
88
87
116
98
86
81
86
76
67
61
111
124
86
76
89
83
90
114
106
63
102
112
101
135
117
153
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
< I
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
< 1
• Fe Hf Hg Ir Mo
% ppm ppm ppb ppm
0.01 5
INA INA INA INA INA
2.31 4 < I < 5 < I
3.3
2.46
2.65
2.77
3.45
3.06
2.91
2.87
2.81
2.43
1.97
3.63
4.06
4.31
3.32
3.19
3.65
3.23
3.39
3.76
4.55
4
3.82
4.37
3.37
4.1
4.06
4.34
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
7
4
4
4
II
4
<I
< I
< I
< I
<I
< I
< I
< 1
< I
< I
< I
<I
<I
< I
< I
< 1
< 1
< 1
<I
< I
< I
< I
< I
< I
< 1
< 1
< 1
<I
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<I
< 1
< I
< I
< I
< 1
2
<I
<I
< I
< I
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
<I
<I
<. i
< I
<I
<I
< I
< 1
< 1
< I
Na
%
0.01
INA
1.72
1.65
1.71
1.92
1.66
1.86
1.55
1.44
1.91
2.04
1.54
1.69
1.11
1.66
1.48
1.87
1.86
2
2.04
! 82
1.52
1.91
1.6
1.65
1.66
2.01
1.78
1.73
1.77
• Ni Rb Sb Sc Se Sn Sr Ta
ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm % % ppm
20 15 0.1 0.1 3 0.02 0.05 0.5
INA INA INA INA iNA INA INA INA
< 20 46 < 0.1 10.3 < 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 20
< 20
65
69
< 20 < 15
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
< 20 < 15
<W
<W
<W
<W
<W
<W
<W
<W
<W
<W
<W
34
81
87
96
56
118
52
39 0.5
93 < 0.1
59
63
0.5
0.4
<20 <15 <0.1
< 20 < 15 0.3
< 20
< 20
< 20
< 20
< 20
< 20
< 20
46 < 0.1
'10 0.3
46 < 0.1
64
56
0.2
0.5
54 <0.1
54 < 0.1
< 20 < 15 0.3
0.2
0.4
0.4
< 20
< 20
< 20
56
43
44
10.1
10
11.4
11.6
14.1
12.4
10.7
10.1
11.1
10
8.4
6.9
12.2
14.1
12.8
12.4
13.1
13.3
1"'" ..: 1..:...0
14.2
15.5
15.6
14.2
16.2
13.1
14.3
14.9
16.3
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 0.06 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 1.2
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < U.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 <. 0.5
..::: 3 < 0.02 <.005 < U.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0 05 1.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05 < 0.5
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05
< 3 < 0.02 < 0.05
1.4
1.4
Th
ppm
0.2
INA
2.2
2.6
4.6
2.2
3.3
2.1
3.5
5.5
3.4
3.4
6.3
5.3
4.9
5.4
6
4.6
3.7
2.4
2.~
2.4
1.8
3.8
7.2
3.9
2.4
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.6
• Element
Unit
Detection Limit
Analysis Method
1'1,06-01
Standard 1
FL06-02
FL06-03
FL06-04
FL06-05
FL06-06
FL06-07
FL06-08
FL06-09
1'1,06-10
FL06-11
FL06-12
FL06-13
FU16-14
Duplicate of FL06-14
FL06-15
FL06-16
FL06-17
FL06-IS
1'1,06-19
FL06-20
FL06-21
FL06-22
Fl.06-!3
FL06-24
FL06-25
Standard 2
FL06-26
FL06-27
FL06-28
FL06-29
FL06-30
u w ppm ppm
0.5 1
INA INA
< 0.5
5.5 < I
<
<05
1,4 < I
<05
<0.5
< 0.5
L5 <: I
LI
0.9 < 1
1.2 < 1
1.1 <: 1
<0.5 <: \
2.1 < I
1.5 <. I
1.5 <I
< 0.5 <
< 0.5 <
< 0.5 <:
<0,5
1.5
0.8
1.2
lA
J.5
~
12
~7
<~5
\3
1,4
<: I
< 1
<:
< I
<I
<I
< 1
<1
<: J
< J
<: I
lAt
ppm
50
INA
50
190
< 50
120
70
610
90
80
120
60
100
80
120
110
60
80
110
90
90
60
90
90
80
50
<.50
100
100
130
< 50
60
< 50
110
< 50
La c~ Nd Sm
ppm ppm ppm ppm
0.5 3 5 0.1
INA INA INA INA
nl 22 8 2.1
29.9 53 27 7
11.7 21 8 2.2
9.3 17 8 2.1
18.2 31 14 3,4
9.1 24 5 1.6
10.2 22 10 1.7
11. J 21 9 1.8
J L3 21 1.8
11.4 27 9 2
8.9 17 1.5
125 24 J I 2
9,3 18 1.5
12.9 27 9 1.8
12.2 26 12 2
12.9 26 9 2
17.8 35 14 2.7
13.4 25 9 2
10.7 19 8 L7
11.1 21 9 L7
12.8 24 <) 1.9
15.5
15,4
7.9
IS.Y
12.4
13.9
29
13.8
10.5
10.6
11.6
13.2
31
27
13
29
21
24
5,
24
20
22
21
23
]]
13
<5
11
8
11
27
9
6
9
8
12
17
2.3
1.3
2.2
2
2.2
6.7
2
L7
1.9
1.9
2
Eu Tb
ppm ppm
0.2 o.s INA INA
0.6 < 0.5
L7
0.7 "0.5
0.7 < 0.5
" 0.5
0.5 0.5
0.5 "05
0.6 <0.5
0.5 < U.5
0.7 "0.5
0.5 < 0.5
0.6 < 0.5
0.6 "0.5
0.6 " 0.5
0.6 "05
0.6 " 0.5
0.9 "0.5
0.7 "0.5
05 "0.5
0.5 < 0.5
0.5 "0.5
1.3 0.5
0.1 <·0.5
0.5 "0.5
0.6 < 0.5
0.7 " 0.5
0.7 <~ 0.5
1.6 0.9
0.6 "0.5
0.6 "0.5
0.6 < 0.5
0.6 < 0.5
0.6 "0.5
• • Yb
ppm
0.2
INA
L3
3.6
1.4
1.7
1.6
0.9
0.9
0.9
Ll
1.1
0.9
l.l
0.9
1.2
1.3
Ll
L2
L2
0.6
2,5
1.5
1.7
1.2
1.4
3.6
1.3
1.5
l.3
1.4
Lu Mass
g
Ag
ppm
0.2
Cd
ppm
6.5
Cu
ppm
Mn
ppm
2
Mo
ppm
2
Ni
ppm
1
Pb
ppm
2
Zn
ppm
S
%
0,01)1
ppm
0.05
INA INA ICP-M8 ICP-MS ICp·MS ICP-MS ICP-MS iCl'-MS lCP-MS I<':I'-MS ICI'-MS
0.2
0.61
0.29
0.25
0.29
0.14
0.13
0.17
0.21
0.19
0.19
26.3 < 0.2 < 0.5 17 525 2 44 9 72 0.0 I
30.8 0.2 <0.5 114 432 4 91 19 187 0.126
30.3 < 0.2 < 0.5 52 452 2 43 7 67 0.006
30.5 0.3 <: O.S 149 1740 "2 72 12 153 0.004
0.2
0.16
0.23
0.21
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.2
0.11
0.19
30
31.9
31.3
30.7
27.8
31
30.5
32.1
30.1
31.3
30.!
30.1
30.6
30.3
30.2
30
30.3
0.41 30.2
0.15 30.2
0.17 30
0.29 30.6
0.25 30.6
0.22 30.7
0.59 :\1
0.26 30.1
0.17 30.2
0.21 28.8
0.23 30.7
0.24 31.1
<0.2
0.4
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
0.3
< 0.2
0.3
<0.2
<0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.2
< 0.2
0.2
<0.2
<: 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2
.c. 0.2
0.2
< 0.2
<0.2
< 0.2
<0.2
< 0.2
<0.5
0.5
< 0.5
< O.S
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
< 0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.',
< 0.5
< 0.5
<0.5
<0.5
< 0.5
<0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
<05
<0.5
< 0.5
<0.5
<05
91
23
153
42
33
34
15
13
416
35
8
12
24
12
R
!()
9
!2
15
59
4
12
9
99
8
16
35
9
642
430
328
460
386
295
192
257
316
267
247
320
454
416
264
248
290
986
269
292
121
238
203
350
482
411
323
242
295
2
2
<2
<2
2
<2
<2
<2
26
2
<2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
37
38
39
40
47
34
23
29
64
28
24
33
29
28
22
17
19
24
16
45
II
26
24
84
22
30
29
24
17
9
3S
7
10
9
l\
9
5
6
7
6
5
4
6
10
(,
7
6
7
18
5
5
7
6
89
768
57
101
85
68
53
98
86
85
55
61
67
64
75
41
64
HII
54
101
31
51
38
162
69
84
67
62
35
0.004
0.007
0.004
0.011
0008
0.009
(l.OO?
0.007
0.011
0.009
0.(l07
0.007
0.007
0.005
0.006
u.UU4
0.012
0.007
0.014
(!.ODS
O'()09
0.009
0.01
0.119
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.012
• Element
Unit
Detection Limit
Analysis Method
FL06-31
1'1.06·32
FL06-33
FL06-34
FL06-35
FL06-36
FL06-37
FL06·38
FL06·39
FL06·40
FL06-41
FUl6-41
FL06-43
FL06-44
Duplicate of FL06-44
FUl6-45
FL06-46
FL06-47
FL06-4S
FUl6-49
FL06-50
FL06-SI
Standard 3
FL06-52
FL06-53
FL06-54
FL06-55
FL06-56
Duplicate of FL06·56
U W Zn
ppm ppm ppm
0.5 50
INA INA
1.3 < I
<0.5 < I
<0.5
1.1 <I
0.9 <: I
0.9 <: I
1.7 <:
1.7
1.2
0.6
1.8 <
1.4 < 1
2.6 < I
0.9 <
<0.5
2.2 <: 1
1.5 < I
L2 <
<0.5 < I
1.2 <: I
1.2 <: I
< 0.5 < I
6.1 2
0.9 <: I
L2 <
1.3 < I
< 0.5 < I
< 0.5 < I
1.3
INA
60
90
60
60
110
70
~o
80
<: 50
90
50
50
110
<~
100
W
<~
~
m ~
100
~
1%
W
50
60
80
< 50
60
La Ce Nd Sm
ppm ppm ppm ppm
0.5 3 5 0.1
INA INA INA INA
12 22 10 1.9
12 23 9 2
16.6 31 II 2.4
11.I 20 8 1.9
13.5 25 II 2.1
12.2 23 II 2.1
15.9 29 13 2.3
17 39 10 2.1
14.3 26 12 2.3
13.4 23 11 2.2
24.8 39 17 3.5
16.4 29 12 2.2
14.6 24 II 2
17.9 56 12 2.8
23.7 65 18 3.7
27.1 42 20 4
12.7 63 II 2.3
lQI 23 7 I~
10.2 20 6 1.8
12.3 26 1.8
U 16 6 1.6
18.6 38 n 2.7
32.4 58 33 7.6
1.9 26 1.9
9.7 21 10 1.9
11.2 22 9 1.9
10.9 29 10 2
9.9 23 9 1.9
10.2 22 8 2
Eu
ppm
0.2
Tb
ppm
0.5
INA INA
0.6 <0.5
0.4 < 0.5
0.7 < 0.5
0.6 0.5
0.7 <: 0.5
0.7 < 0.5
0.8 <: 0.5
0.6 <: 0.5
0.7 < 0.5
0.8 0.5
0.5
0.7 <: 0.5
0.5 < 0.5
0.7 < 0.5
1.1 < 0.5
1.2 0.6
0.7 < 0.5
0.6 <: 0.5
0.6 < 0.5
0.6 < 0.5
0.4 < 0.5
0.8 < 0.5
1.9 0.8
0.6 <: 0.5
0.7 < 0.5
0.6 < 0.5
0.7 <0.5
0.7 < 0.5
0.7 < 0.5
• • Yb
ppm
11.2
INA
12
1.4
13
1.1
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.I
1.4
3
I~
J2
I~
I~
I~
1.4
12
12
12
1.4
1.3
4.2
1.3
1.6
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
Lu Mass Ag
ppm
0.2
Cd
ppm
0.5
Cn
ppm
1
Mn
ppm
2
Mo Ni
ppm
1
Pb
ppm
2
Zn S
ppm g ppm
1
ppm %
0.05
INA
0.2
0.25
0.25
0.21
0.22
0.2
0.31
0.25
0.22
0.25
03
0.24
0.2
0.29
0.31
0.28
0.22
0.21
0.18
0.23
0.2
0.24
0.7
0.21
0.26
0.22
0.22
0.25
0.23
0.001
INA ICP-MS ICP-MS ICP-MS ICP-MS ICP·MS KP·MS JCNI-'S ICP-MS iCP-MS
32.2 < 0.2 <: 0.5 7 289 2 20 6 36 0.005
30.8 < 0.2 <: 0.5 13 330 2 24 7 89 0.011
31.2 <: 0.2 < 0.5 275 < 2 25 55 0.005
30.1 < 0.2 < 0.5 16 205 <: 2 25 4 5 I 0.003
31.6 <0.2 <0.5 12 417 <2 27 64 0.006
30.6 <: 0.2 < 0.5 15 325 < 2 36 61 0.003
30.2 0.2 < 0.5 9 266 < 2 27 58 0.005
30.5 < 0.2 < 0.5 12 373 2 30 10 57 0.007
30 < 0.2 0.5 27 270 2 27 7 69 0.008
30.2
30.9
30.6
26.7
25.5
22.3
30.6
31.7
31.4
31.6
33.2
30.2
30.3
30.9
30
31.5
30.5
32.6
32
31.5
< 0.2
<: 0.2
< 0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
< 0.2
<0.2
0.2
<0.2
<: 0.2
0.2
<0.2
0.2
< 0.2
<: 0.2
< 0.2
<0.2
< 0.2
<0.2
< 0.5
<: 0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
0.5
0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
<0.5
<: 0.5
<0.5
0.5
< 0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
< 0.5
< 0.5
0.5
12
15
9
14
C
~
~
\23
II
~
C
II
n \01
M H 18
~
50
~
236
250
96
133
770
920
364
27\
347
295
456
376
563
414
322
396
306
638
413
413
<2
<2
<2
4
2
<2
<2
<2
<2
2
<2
4
<2
<2
<2
2
<2
<2
24
23
14
19
38
46
40
47
41
35
45
48
49
82
34
37
34
53
42
43
6
12
14
17
6
6
4
7
7
17
7
IS
6
9
5
6
54
40
22
63
72
79
57
41
49
39
54
67
73
167
51
62
50
84
57
56
0.004
0.008
0.007
0.037
0.01
0.009
0.005
0.0\ I
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.008
0.004
O.ll
0.005
0.007
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.005
