4iPiaswei3a a.e 174 YEO 010
MAGNETOMETER AND VLF-EM REPORT CLAIMS P-68316^, 169,181*2**?
CHESTER TOWNSHIP
PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION
DISTRICT OF SUDBURY, ONTARIO
PREPARED BYi BOBEX RESOURCES LTD.
FORt KIDD RESOURCES LTD.
J. Bankowski Geologist
MAY, 1985
RECEIVED
MAY 31 1985
MINING LANDS SECTION
TABLE OF CON
PAGE
41P12SW0132 S .B\7A YEO
CONTENTS
010C
1 ..,..,......,....,..... INTRODUCTION....................... PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
....................... LOCATION AND ACCESS
2 ,.. .. .................. CLAIM LOCATION MAP (PIG. 3)
3 . , , . .. . .. . . . .... .. , . .. . HISTORY OF EXPLORATION
, .... . . , . ... ........... GENERAL GEOLOGY CLAIM GEOLOGY
if ,.......,.,,..... ...,.. CLAIM GEOLOGY CONT.. ........ .............. GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS. ...................... A) VLF-EM SURVEY
5 ....................... FIGURE 2 t VLF PLAN6 ..,,.,...,....,,,,.,,,, B) MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
7 ,..............,......, FIG.3 i MAGNETOMETER PLAN
8 ,. ,., ,,... .......,..... CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
9 .. ,.. ,.,.....,...,..... REFERRENCES
10 ,. .,....,........,..... CERTIFICATE
INTRODUCTION
A program of linecutting, VLF-EM and magnetometer surveying
was conducted on the property during the period March 3 to 11,
1985- Grid spacing is 400 feet between lines with stations every
100 feet along the lines. A total of 6.2 miles of line was cut to
cover the property.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The property consists of four contiguous mining claims numb
ered P-683164,169,181 ft 24?, all located in Yeo Township, Porcu
pine Mining Division, District of Sudbury, Ontario (Figure #1).
The claims are currently in good standing with the provincial
mining recorder and are registered to Calvin Black, lie. #A-43354
(P-683l64,l69 ft 181) and Leo P. Snider, lie. #C-32054 (P-68324?).
The property is held in trust for Kidd Resources Ltd., with head
office located at 1585-B Britannia Road East, Suites 11 b 12,
Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 2M4.
LOCATION AND ACCESS
The property is located in central Yeo Township (see O.M.N.R.
plan G-2481).
Access to the property is easily attained via several lumber
ing roads which cross the property and branch north from the Chest
er Road.
Personnel involved in the linecutting and geophysical surveys
travelled to the property daily by snow-mobile.
: 9/0 y?
m4
;, YT, . . -, j *X.OX l V 69UC8 f M,H'.: ,~ -(ri,T- U- —————
l l *"iW lOUK.Vjl . l rJ^
' ,U l l )--d (Q.^.'-C dj ___dJ_ __ d l JJ -
HISTORY OF EXPLORATION* The general area has been prospected since about 1900 (Siragusa,
G.M., 1981).
Shallow shafts have been sunk in the area in 1912, 1932, 1935,
1936 and 1937* Several shallow shafts have been sunk in recent years
on the property of Murgold Resources Ltd. in Chester Twp. to the
east. Small mills were installed and operated intermittently at
several of the shafts but prolonged and economically viable mining
has not been achieved to date.
GENERAL GEOLOGY
The nortern portion of Yeo Township is composed predominantly
of Archean volcanic rock. A band of thoeiitic volcanic flows cuts
the northeast corner of the township trending at the regional
strikeof about 100 to 120 degrees. The bulk of the northern portion
of the township is composed of intermediate pyroclastics with some
intercalated sediments and tholeiitic flows in the northwest corn
er of the township. Another band of tholeiitic flows crosses the
central portion of the township at the regional strike and is
bounded to the northeast and southwest by intrusive trondhjemites
belonging to the quartz diorite clan. The southeast extension of
the aforementioned tholeiitic band has been mapped by Siragusa
(1981) as migmatitic rock.
CLAIM GEOLOGY
The bulk of the claims is underlain by trondhjemitic-graono-
dioritic intrusive rock with the remainder crossed by tholeiitic
volcanics in the southwest portion of the property*
The intrusive trondhjemite-granodiorite is generally light
in colour with a relatively low content of mafic minerals. Volcanic
CLAIM GEOLOGY CONT.
xenoliths altered to diorite-quartz-diorite are common.
The tholeiitic volcanic rock is composed of foliated flows
some of which are pillowed.
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS
A VLF-EM and a magnetometer survey were conducted on the prop
erty during the period March 3 to 11, 1985*
The VLP-EM instrument used was a Geonics EM-16 and the primary
transmitter used was Cutler, Maine with a frequency of 24.0 KHz.
The magnetometer used was a geoMetrics G-816 portable proton
unit and readings were taken on the 60,000 gamma scale. Loop tie-
in readings were used for drift corrections.
A) VLF-EM SURVEYS
A total of five cross-over conductors were outlined on the
property. The best conductor outlined has a strike length of about
2,000 feet at about 120 degrees azimuth. The amplitude of this
conductor is quite wide and averages about 1000 feet. A shorter
conductor also with a wide amplitude though only about 800 feet
in length crosses L128W, L124W and L120W at 22S, 23S and 22S
respectively and may represent the extension of the larger con
ductor which crosses L116W to L96W at 243,243, 23S, 233,243 and
26S respectively (Figure 2).
A moderate to weak conductor crosses L92W, L88W and.L84W at
18S, 15S and US respectively while two short, weak conductors
were outlined at the southwest and southeast corners of the prop
erty.
GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS CONT,
W MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
Magnetic relief on the property is in the order of 2811 gammas
with highs of 609191 60809 and 60061 located at L100W-11S, L116W-
19S and L124W-42S respectively (Figure 3).
Magnetic lows of 58108, 58166, 58289 and 58288 are located at
L120W-36W, L112W-34S, L10^W-2?S and L132W-19S respectively.
Linear mag highs which may represent diabase dikes were not
noted on the property.
In general, the magnetic contours indicate a band about 800
feet wide and striking at the regional trend of about 120 degrees
of greater than 59000 gammas and crossing the central to eastern
portion of the property. The remainder of the property is generally
lower than 59000 gammas.
The higher magnetic band mentioned above may represent a
volcanic xenolith with a relatively higher magnetite concentration
while the remainder of the property below 59000 gammas probably
represents trondhjemite-granodiorite. Small areas of greater than
59000 gammas within the intrusive may represent smaller volcanic
xenoliths.
Relatively large magnetic lows possibly representing areas
of alteration of the bedrock were not noted with all of the lows
as well as the highs only being one or two-station readings.
8
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Two wide amplitude conductors exist on the property and are
described on page k . These two conductors have a combined length
of 2800 feet and may represent a zone of shearing.
A moderate to weak conductor previously described, runs obli
quely to the regional trend and could represent a fault.
The other two conductors are both weak and short and may rep
resent topographic features.
The magnetic survey has outlined a band of relatively high
magnetics crossing the property along the regional trend. This
band is considered to represent a volcanic xenolith surrounded
by intrusive rock with a relatively low magnetic signature.
The two wide amplitude conductors run along the south contact
of what is interpreted to be a volcanic xenolith running at the
regional trend. Since nearly all of the gold in the area occurs
within shears striking at the regional trend, there is a good pos
sibility that the two conductors on the property represents a zone
of shearing with related gold mineralization.
It is therefore recommended that the stroger conductors be
investigated visually on the property during the summer* Samplesi
should be collected if possible and assayed. If encouraging assays
are obtained, trenching with a bulldozer or backhoe should be done
to expose the structure.
REFERRENCES
Siragusa, G.M.1981: Precambrian Geology of Chester and Yeo Townships, and parts of Neville and Potier Townships, Sudbury District; Ontario, Geological Survey Preliminary Map P.2449, Geological Series, Scale 1:15,840 or l inch to 3/4 mile. Geology 1980.
10
CERTIFICATE
I, Joseph H. Bankowski, do hereby cer-tifyj
that I am an exploration geologist residing at 811
Sweetwater Cres., Mississauga, Ontario;
that I am a graduate of the University of Western
Ontario, London, Ontario, and hold a Bachelor of
Science degree as a geologist dated 1980;
that I have been engaged in the practice of this
profession since graduating;
that I have no interest, direct or indirect, nor
do I expect to receive any such interest in the
properties or securities of Kidd Resources Ltd,
Joseph H. Bankowski, B.Se.
Geologist
May .198 5
i Ministry olNaturalResources
Ontario
Report of Work{Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures) J&
Tl41PiaSW013a 2 .8174 YEO 900
e vrsed list, the
sred nns.
Type of S urvey(f)
Claim HolderU)
Township o [ Area
yeoProspector's Licence No.
r-Address
-/S fS 0Date of Survey (from 8r to)Survey Company
8o6ex /ne.Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Te^hnical report)
J. tZonkofj/sk/ j xf?t?Xo | Yr. o. | Yr.
Total Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days perClaim
JO2.0
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
i [^ [; ;,— -~
Calculation of fixpenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures . , -, r;
1* i.-... : ••..*.
--^.1
— --
Total , . . ' Days Credits
15 ; 1Instructions \~.
Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
lDatCL- s Recorded Holder opAgent (/Signature)
Mining ClaimPrefix
/?
...,.. iv. ?t:
Number
^ f? 2* 7 '/i "-^ 6 O "5 /v f
6&X/69^Q^/Of
68*5247
Expend. Days Cr.
j RECEIVEIAPR 0 J 1985
\MINING LAND
i
;n r -- - -j i
MAR 9,-..,:..... /^
' * ' *^5*r"'/
J 1i
; ste i
r-. . ^-- 1^ ' li •t-' k -j
'CO-
/".^H7^r~'
)
01
D
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Date Recorded Recorded --"Wl -~*
jljb *^WsJts-is Recorded ^T
Certification Verifying Rep6rt of Work1 hereby certify that 1 have a persona or witnessed same during and/or after
Mining ClaimPrefix
••'S-k*'*
11,
Number
Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
-n^T*'^mBrXtfjQb
TfSfderjSt*'CtoT""
r /^^
}
Expend. Days Cr.
4-
*lk***~
*
and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed Ti&eto, having peHerfmed the work its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying ^- .
^ ~* Da'te Certified j Certified by (Sjgnatuu) t
y , /Ssi^kt^'ttAf
Ontario
Ministry of Natural ResourcesGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL
TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
File.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—
TVti/A/SH/P ,C, 3 /nek A-
Survey Company — Author of Report ^ Address nf Author oy/Covering Dates of Survey.
Total Miles of Line Cut_(linecutting to Office)
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical—Electromagnetic.-Magnetometer——Radiometric——-Other—————
DAYSper claim
Geological.Geochemical.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
DATE:. SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent
Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix) (number)
i
RECEIVED
MAY 31 1985
TOTAL CLAIMS.
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations —————————————————————————Number of Readings .Station interval ______________________________Line sparing
Profile scale —-——.——————-———^———^——.—^—.———.—————.———.Contour interval.
Instrument —yH Accuracy — Scale constant.
Diurnal correction method.
O
Base Station check-in interva^(hours). Base Station location and value ———
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument
nml rnnfigiiration
(Yiil separation
Arrurary
Method: C] Fixed transmitter D Shoot back Q In lineFrrqiienry
(specify V.L.F. station)
D Parallel line
Parameters measured.
Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument .————Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency —————
- Off time _______________________,—— Range ———————— Delay time ——————————————————————————— Integration time.
w - w W Power.Electrode array.Electrode spacing — Type of electrode —
SELF POTENTIAL
Instrument_______________________________________ Range.Survey Method -——-————-^—————-—^^———-—.——.—^—-—-^—...—™.—..———
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRIC
Instrument———Values measured.Energy windows (levels)—-———-———-——————-^————————————..—-.—...i—...-Height of instrument___________________________Background Count. Size of detector--.——————.w—-—..^.—-—.—^..^^-.-...—.-.—.———-—-..—^——-.Overburden ——————————.———^————-—^---——————.—..——-—————-—.—..—
(type, depth - include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)
Type of survey———————-——————————^———.Instrument ———^^———^^————————————-Accuracy——————————————————————————Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
AIRBORNE SURVEYS
Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————
(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy-————————^—^————
(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used —————————————:————————————————————
Sensor altitude———————————————— Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude-^———.——.——.———.———————————-Line Spacing——Miles flown over total area——^^-——————--——^^———————Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————— Terrain—————————
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: percent
p. p. m. p. p. b.
D D D
Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)
Others ' ______——______;______Field Analysis (.
Drainage Development___________ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——
Field Laboratory Analysis
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————
Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used——
Commercial Laboratory (~ Name of Laboratory— Extraction Method- Analytical Method ——Reagents Used-———
.tests)
-tests)
-tests)
General. General.
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File Na •6/74
TYPE OF SURVEY V GEOPHYSICAL
____ GEOLOGICAL
____ GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
Signature of Asses
Date
June 24, 1965 Fllei 2.8174
Kidd Resources Inc Suites 11 A 12 166SB Br1ttann1a Road East H1s1ssauga, Ontario UW 1S5
Dear Sirs:
REs Geophysical (Electromagnetic, Magnetometer) Surveys submitted on Mining Claims P 683164, et al, 1n the Township of Yeo
Enclosed 1s the plan, In duplicate, for the Electromagnetic survey.
Please have the data readings profiled on the plans and return then to this office quoting file 2.8174.
For further Information, please contact Doug Isherwood at (416)965-4888.
Yours sincerely,
S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1H3 Phone:(416)965-4888
D. lsherwood:mc
cct Mining RecorderTimmins, Ontario
cc: 0. BankowsMBox 189Gogama, OntarioPOM 1WO
End.
REGISTERED
May 17. 1985 Report of Work #102/85
Kidd Resources Inc Suited 11 ft 12 1565B Britannia Road East M1ss1ssauga, Ontario L4U 1S5
Dear Sirs;
RE: Mining Claims P 683164, et al, 1n Yeo Township
I have not received the reports and maps (In duplicate) for the Geophysical (Magnetometer ft Electromagnetic) Survey on the above-mentioned claims.
As the assessment "Report of Work" was recorded bythe Mining Recorder on March 29* 1985, the 60 day period allowedby Section 77 of the Mining Act for the submissionof the technical reports and maps to this officewill expire on May 28* 1985.
If the material 1s not submitted to this office by May 28, I will have no alternative but to Instruct the Mining Recorder to delete the work credits from the claim record sheets.
For further Information, please contact Mr. Arthur Barr at (416)965-4888.
Yours sincerely,
1985,
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4888
A. Barr:me
cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario
Incl.
cc! J. Bankowskl Box 189Gogama, Ontario POM 1WO
01 KIDD RESOURCES LTD.
June 24, 1985
Mr. D. Isherwood Whitney Block Room 6643 Queen's Park
M?A 0?w?' Ont ' RE - VLF-EM SURVEY, CLAIMS P683164 et al M ' A l vv:) YEO TWP. Your File #2.8174______Dear Mr. Isherwood:
Please find enclosed, duplicate copies of the VLF-EM Survey in question. Profiles forthe in-phase component at a scale of l" to 1001 have been added. I regret the oversight on my part and will ensure that this does not happen in the future.
SincerelyKIDD RESOURCES LTD.
y t Pe*J*fVxAj
BB Joe Bankowski Ends.
RECEIVED
JUN 27 1985
MINING LANDS SECTION
1585-B Britannia Road E., Suites 11 A 12, Mississauga, Ontario L4W 2M4 (416) 677-2560
REFERENCESMHKK^^^^.^MMKH^B^^HI^BBM———a^BIB———.B^II l ——————^———— l- l
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
M.R.O.-MINING RIGHTS ONLY
S.R.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
M.+ S. - MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS
DweriptJon Order No. Dat* Dnpovtton File
POTIER TWP.
aH- coh- mDC
722*41 ^722*4*1 742776 I 742777 l 742779 7427*O
7794** | 72S354 72S33I (TKS54* rfeS523 I7S8O06fc~-if
73-4398 734397 734396
- L4I86 634424 l 725O8O \, 72SOIZ 758C9*J4̂ !" '*- ~T~"jT——————Y_____L
P ——— ~——
.14312 7__rrWH __i -j ir ——v———____.____ ( 725007 j 538522 | t
6415 .-37 ICT44WI ,'V * ' P l p ' '~—— —— '— ——p—('— —— — L .72*720^ f 725fry84
|Pl i r \ i f f p
750000 'MSS*, l N*~. l l P
17294411 72SD86— ———007K7 80)71**( ——T—j 758*39 f 807*9 ./p P———— ————- ——————^
ccHII- eoUJx o
SMUTS TWP.
LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No. OTHER ROADS TRAILS SURVEYED LINES:
TOWNSHIPS, BASE L INES. ETC.LOTS, M INING CLAIMS. PARCELS, ETC
UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY UTILITY L INES NON-PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING R IGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARS* OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT SYMBOL
PATENT. SURFACE 8r MINING WIGHTS———... .—.., 9" .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY......................^ C
" .MINING R IGHTS ONLY ..._.................^ QLEASE.SURFACE St MINING RIGHTS...—..-.—......™ B
" .SURFACE RIGHTSONLY.,^........,............, H" . MINING R IGHTS ONLY.........................^ Q
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ........m........,.....™... TORDER IN COUNCIL ..........................m.^.;..-. OCRESERVATION ._.................,.,.............m-. (J)CANCELLED ___.......___.....-........^.......... *SAND* GRAVEL ._.......,............................. ©
NOTS: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATINTCO PBIOft TO MAV 6. 1913. VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUALIC LANDS ACT. R SO 1BTO. CHAP. 3*0. SEC. *3. SUBSEC 1.
SCALE: 1 INCH ^ 40CHAINS
FEET10OO JOOO 4000 cooo woo
O 3OO METRES
toood KM)
TOOO(2KMI
TOWNSHIP
YEOM.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
GOGAMAMINING DIVISION
PORCUPINELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION
SUDBURYMinistryof LandNatural Management
Resources BranchOntario
DataOCTOBER, 1 983
•••••r
G-2481
OD
I/D l
m O
Qi dGO
41P12SW0I32 2.BI74 YEO 200
ra s jj-rv
to
i
4
"X1
ft * li
o o N -O
^ s
tk * 53 5 i S3 H