RSPO audit Report · Annual Surveillance Assessment Report Report Number CU813182 ... 3.2.1...

RSPO Principles & Criteria Annual Surveillance Assessment Report

Report Number CU813182

RSPOPC-ASAREPORT.F01 EN (02) FEB2012 Page 1 of 24

Control Union Certifications Meeuwenlaan 4-6, 8011 BZ Zwolle, P.O. Box 161, 8000 AD Zwolle, Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)38 - 426 0100, Fax: +31 (0)38 - 423 7040, E-mail: [email protected]

Annual Surveillance Assessment (02) Report

PUBLIC SUMMARY

PT Agrowiratama Jorong Aie Aji (Air Haji), Nagari Sungai Aua Kecamatan Sungai Aua (Sungai Aur),

Kabupaten Pasaman Barat Propinsi Sumatra Barat, Indonesia

This public summary has been prepared in accordance with RSPO requirements and the information included is the result of a full RSPO assessment of the Mills and supply base as included in the scope

of the certificate.

Report prepared by: Name: Simon Selvaraj (Lead Assessor)

Certification decision by: Name: Gerben Stegeman (Certifier)

Control Union Certifications (Head office)

Meeuwenlaan 4-6, P.O. Box 161.

8000 AD Zwolle. The Netherlands.

[email protected] Phone: 0031 38436 0100

Local Office Control Union (Malaysia) S/B

Persiaran Raja Muda Musa, Off Jalan Sg Berith, Teluk Gadong, 41100, Klang,

Selangor. Malaysia. Phone 03-3377 1600 / 1700

[email protected]

Control Union (Indonesia) Jl Kramat 3A, Cilandak Timur

Jakarta Selatan 12560 Phone: 062-21-7884 2016

[email protected]

Control Union Certifications is a member of the Control Union World Group - an international

inspection and certification body. CU performs assessments and certification in many agricultural

based fields such as FSC, RSPO, and Organic production, Sustainable Textile Production, Organic

Exchange, GLOBALGAP, HACCP, BRC, GMP and GTP.

CU is accredited by the Dutch Council of Accreditation (RVA) on the European quality standard EN

45011 for the inspection and certification of CU Organic program (according to the EU regulation

2092/91) and GLOBALGAP program. When requested a copy of the accreditation certificate can be

obtained from CU.

www.controlunion.com

mailto:[email protected]



http://www.controlunion.com/






Table of Contents

PART 1: SCOPE OF THE CERTIFICATION AUDIT ..................................................................................... 4

1.1 COMPANY AND CONTACT DETAILS ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 RSPO MEMBERSHIP DETAILS ............................................................................................................. 4 1.3 ANNUAL SURVEILLANCE ASSESSMENT DETAILS ...................................................................................... 4 1.4 ASSESSMENT TYPE. (MILL, ESTATE AND MILL, PLANTATION ONLY, ETC.).................................................... 4 1.5 LOCATION OF THE PALM OIL MILL ....................................................................................................... 4 1.6 PALM OIL MILL OUTPUT AND APPROXIMATE TONNAGES CERTIFIED ............................................................ 5 1.7 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLY BASE............................................................................................... 5

1.7.1 Location of the Supply Base ............................................................................................... 5 1.7.2 Statistics of the Supply Base and Estimated Tonnes of FFB produced per Year ............... 6 1.7.3 Percentage of Planted Oil Palm by different Age Ranges ................................................ 6 1.7.4 Calculation of the Number of Production Units (N) to Sample for the Mill ..................... 6

1.8 PROGRESS OF ASSOCIATED SMALLHOLDERS OR OUTGROWERS TOWARDS COMPLIANCE WITH RELEVANT

STANDARDS - SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE 3 YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ................................................ 6 1.9 LOCATION MAP FOR THIS CERTIFICATION UNIT (SEE APPENDIX 1) ............................................................ 6

PART 2: PARTIAL CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................... 7

2.1 MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE. ............................................................................................................... 7 2.2 NON-COMPLIANCE IDENTIFIED WITH 2.1 ABOVE .................................................................................... 7 2.3 SUMMARY OF THE TIME BOUND PLAN ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 UN-CERTIFIED UNITS OR HOLDINGS ..................................................................................................... 8 2.5 SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS FOR PARTIAL CERTIFICATION ....................................................................... 9 2.6 PARTIAL CERTIFICATION AUDIT AGENDA .............................................................................................. 9

PART 3: AUDIT PROCESS ...................................................................................................................... 9

3.1 ABOUT THE CERTIFICATION BODY ........................................................................................................ 9 3.2 AUDIT TEAM .................................................................................................................................... 9

3.2.1 Qualifications of the Lead Auditor ........................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 Qualifications of the Assessment Team ................................................................................. 10

3.3 AUDIT METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 11 3.3.1 General Overview ............................................................................................................ 11 3.3.2 Audit Agenda ................................................................................................................... 12

PART 4 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS ......................................................................................................... 13

4.1 LEAD ASSESSOR’S SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION FOR CERTIFICATION.............................................. 13 4.2 SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS BY PRINCIPLE AND A SAMPLE OF THE CRITERIA .............................................. 14

Principle 1: Commitment to Transparency ..................................................................................... 14 Principle 2: Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations .................................................... 14 Principle 3: Commitment to Long-Term Economic and Financial Viability ..................................... 15 Principle 4: Use of Appropriate Best Practices by Growers and Millers ......................................... 15 Principle 5: Environmental Responsibility and Conservation of Natural Resources and Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Principle 6: Responsible Consideration of Employees and of Individuals and Communities by Growers and Millers ........................................................................................................................ 16 Principle 7: Responsible Development of New Plantings ................................................................ 17 Principle 8: Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Key Areas of Activity ............................. 17

4.3 SAMPLE CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION IN THIS REPORT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS DURING THE LIFETIME OF THE

CERTIFICATE ............................................................................................................................................ 17 4.4 NON-CONFORMITY REGISTER AND REPORTS ON PREVIOUS NCS .............................................................. 18

4.4.1 Annual Audit NC Summary ..................................................................................................... 18 4.4.2 Status of non-conformities (both Minor and Major) previously identified, even if already Closed Out ....................................................................................................................................... 18

4.5 NON-CONFORMITY REPORT FOR NC IDENTIFIED DURING THIS ASA ............................................................. 18






4.6 OBSERVATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 18 4.7 ISSUES THAT WERE RAISED DURING THE STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION AND COMPANY RESPONSES .............. 19

PART 5: RSPO SUPPLY CHAIN CERTIFICATION ................................................................................... 19

PART 6: CERTIFIED ORGANISATION’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNAL RESPONSIBILITY .............. 20

6.1 DATE OF NEXT ASA......................................................................................................................... 20 6.2 DATE FOR CLOSURE OF NON-CONFORMITIES ....................................................................................... 20 6.3 SIGNING BY THE CLIENT ................................................................................................................... 20 6.4 SIGNING BY THE LEAD AUDITOR ........................................................................................................ 20 6.5 SIGNING BY THE CERTIFIER ............................................................................................................... 20

PART 7: APPENDICIES ......................................................................................................................... 21

APPENDIX 1: LOCATION MAP FOR THIS CERTIFICATION UNIT ........................................................................... 21 APPENDIX 2: INFORMATION ON THE RSPO CERTIFICATE ................................................................................ 23 APPENDIX 3: RSPO P&C SUMMARY SHEET ................................................................................................. 23 APPENDIX 4: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................... 23






PART 1: SCOPE OF THE CERTIFICATION AUDIT

1.1 Company and Contact Details

Company name: PT Agrowiratama

Business address: Spring Tower 06-61, Jl. K.L. Yos Sudarso Km 7,8, Tanjung Mulia, Medan 20241, Indonesia

Group name if applicable: -

Office telephone: +62 61 661 5511

Contact person: Dr Gan Lian Tiong.

Mobile telephone: +62 811 632 831

Fax: +62 61 661 7386

e-mail: [email protected]

Web site: -

1.2 RSPO Membership Details

RSPO membership number: 1-0054-08-000-00 [old number: 029-08(O) dated 26th May 2008]

Parent company as applicable: -

Date of original certification: 17th

June, 2010

Certificate number: CU-RSPO-813182

Date of last audit: 3rd

to 5th

May, 2011

1.3 Annual Surveillance Assessment Details

Dates of this audit: 17th

-19th April 2012

ASA number (1 to 4): 2 (two)

1.4 Assessment Type. (Estate and Mill, Plantation only, etc.)

Palm Oil Mill and estate owned and scheme smallholders managed by PT. Agrowiratama

1.5 Location of the Palm Oil Mill

Palm Oil Mill (POM) Location Address

GPS Reference

Name Longitude Latitude

Agrowiratama POM Jorong Aie Aji, Nagari Sungai Aua, Kecamatan Sungai Aua, Kabupaten Pasaman Barat, Propinsi Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

99° 37’ 35.72”E

0° 11’ 56.25” N


http://www.musimmas.com/






1.6 Palm Oil Mill Output and Approximate Tonnages Certified

The 12 month output is the average over any 12 month period and the actual production for the 12 months from the date of certification will be included in the first annual summary. These figures exclude any output product from non-certified suppliers.

Projected Production from last 12 Months (MT) Actual Production (MT)* FFB CPO PK PKO PKE FFB CPO PK PKO** PKE**

210,635 50,026 12,638 5,763 6,496 219,113 50,958 13,418 6,038 7,112

Note : * Actual Production 17th June 2011 – 31st March 2012 + estimated production April 2012 – 16th June 2012

** PKO and PKE produced by PT Wira Inno Mas (PT WIM) KCP Plant at another location which is RSPO SCCS certified (certification no. C816404CU-RSPO SCCS-01.2011 date 21st November 2011 audited by CUC). Conversion of PK to CPKO is 0 .45% and

PK to CPKE is 0.53%. (Reference from RSPO manual PT Wira Inno Mas, document number RSPO-FD-03, Rev:00) System for IP, SG and MB mechanism is in place in Agrowiratama POM

1.7 General Description of Supply Base

PT Agrowiratama palm oil mill and its supply base including the KKPA Scheme Smallholder was certified on 17th June 2010. The supply base comprises of PT Agrowiratama - Estate Sei Aur and scheme smallholders ( KKPA ) KSB I & KSB II, KSBSAMB and KSDBS which is fully managed by PT Agrowiratama. In this ASA02, the National Interpretation of RSPO P&C for Indonesia was used to assess the palm oil mill, estate and KKPA Scheme Smallholder. The area of oil palm planted is 7,580 ha (6,056 ha estate, 1,524 ha KKPA). The mill processing capacity is 45 ton FFB per hour.

1.7.1 Location of the Supply Base

Oil Palm Plantation (OPP) Location Address GPS Reference

CU Code Name Longitude Latitude

OPP 1 PT.Agrowiratama - Estate Sei Aur

Jorong Aie Aji, Nagari Sungai Aua Kecamatan Sungai Aua Kabupaten Pasaman Barat Propinsi Sumatera Barat, Indonesia.

99o 34’ 12” E 0o 10’ 48” N

OPP 2 KSB I & KSB II (Koperasi sawit Bersama)

Jorong Aie Aji, Nagari Sungai Aua, Kecamatan Sungai Aua, Kabupaten Pasaman Barat, Propinsi Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

99o 36’ 35” E 0o 11’ 24,86” N

OPP 3

KSBSAMB (Koperasi Sawit Bosa Sungai Aua Manjunjung Bilang)

Jorong Sungai Aua, Nagari Sungai Aua, Kecamatan Sungai Aua, Kabupaten Pasaman Barat, Propinsi Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

99o 31’ 15” E 0o 09’ 44,92” N

OPP 4 KSDBS (Koperasi Sawit datuk Bosa Sikilang)

Jorong Sikilang, Nagari Sungai Aua, Kecamatan Sungai Aua, Kabupaten Pasaman Barat, Propinsi Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

99o 31’ 16” E 0o 08’ 42,02” N

Projected Production for next 12 Months (MT) FFB CPO PK PKO** PKE**

220,198 52,848 13,762 6,193 7,294






1.7.2 Statistics of the Supply Base and Estimated Tonnes of FFB produced per Year

CU Code Name Area of Oil Palm (ha) Estimated Tonnes FFB/Yr

Planting Years Cycle (Years)

Total Mature

OPP 1 PT.Agrowiratama - Estate Sei Aur

6,061 6,056* 176,016 1990 – 2007 25

OPP 2 KSB I & KSB II 524 524 15,082 1996 – 2002 25

OPP 3 KSBSAMB 500 500 14,148 2005 25

OPP 4 KSDBS 500 500 14,952 2005 25

Total 10,862 7,580 220,198 Note : *Reduction of 5 Ha in Estate PT. Agrowiratama in 2012 due to the development for Biogas Plant (3 Ha) and worker housing (2 Ha)

1.7.3 Percentage of Planted Oil Palm by different Age Ranges

CU Code Planting Years by 5 year Ranges

1990 – 1994 1995 – 1999 2000 - 2004 2005 – 2009 2010 – 2014 Total (%)

OPP 1 2,097 (27.66 %) 1,151 (15.18 %) 2,671 (35.24 %) 137 (1.80 %) - 6,056 (79.88 %)

OPP 2 - 134 (1.77 %) 390 ( 5.15 %) - - 524 (6.92 %)

OPP 3 - - - 500 (6.60 %) - 500 (6.60 %)

OPP 4 - - - 500 (6.60 %) - 500 (6.60 %)

Total 2,097 (27.66%) 1,285 (16.95 %) 3,061 (40.39 %) 1,137 (15.00 %) - 7,580 (100.00%)

1.7.4 Calculation of the Number of Production Units (N) to Sample for the Mill

N = 0.8√Y, where “Y” is the number of units, with the result always to be rounded “up” to the next whole integer. Where only a sample of the supply base is assessed, units not previously assessed, or assessed earlier in the certification program, are to be preferred over those more recently assessed

For the Mill, how many units make up the production base?

Owned estates (Y) N = 0.8√Y Smallholders (Z) N = 0.8√Z

1 (Sei Aur Estate)

1 (Sei Aur Estate)

3 Scheme Smallholders: KSB I & KSB II, KSBSAMB And KSBDBS

2 (It is fully managed by the Estate as a one entity)

Explanation as to the selection of estates sampled

The number of sample for estate is according to the formula mention above.

1.8 Progress of associated Smallholders or Out-growers towards Compliance with relevant Standards - should be in accordance to the 3 year implementation plan

The scheme smallholders (KKPA) was certified as supply base simultaneously with the estate using the RSPO P&C on 17

th June, 2010.

1.9 Location Map for this Certification Unit (See Appendix 1)






PART 2: PARTIAL CERTIFICATION

The rules for partial certification allow organizations that have a majority holding in and / or management control of more than one autonomous company growing oil palm to certify individual management units and / or subsidiary companies subject to certain rules.

2.1 Management Structure.

Section Criteria Yes/No

2.1.1 Is the certified operation (POM and supply base as detailed above) a stand-alone operation and there are no other plantations or mills owned by the same company?

No

2.1.2 Is the certified operation part of a simple structure of operations owned by one company?

Yes

2.1.3 Are there statements of the ultimate controlling shareholders and directors in the managing agency company/companies:

a. Explaining the legal relationship and the management arrangements with the subsidiary companies and / or with any operating groups?

Yes

2.1.4 b. A statement of commitment to complying with the spirit of the RSPO for all companies and subsidiaries involved with the growing of oil palm and for the production of palm oil?

Yes

2.1.5 Is there a time bound plan in place for all subsidiaries, estates and palm oil mills? Yes

2.1.6 Is the parent company or one of its majority owned and / or managed subsidiaries a member of RSPO.

Yes

2.2 Non-compliance Identified with 2.1 Above

Section Non-compliance findings NC raised Category

2.2.1 There is no explanation as to the company’s structure and therefore it Is not possible to conduct an effective audit against the rules for partial certification.

- -

2.2.2 There is no statement of commitment to complying with the spirit of the RSPO for all companies within the company structure.

- -

2.2.3 There is no time bound plan in place for the certification for all subsidiaries, estates and mills.

- -

2.2.4 No applicable membership of the RSPO. - -

2.3 Summary of the Time Bound Plan

Section Requirement Findings and any action required Compliance

2.3.1 Does the plan include all subsidiaries, estates and mills?

The company has adhered time bound plan. Yes

2.3.2 Is the time bound plan challenging? Age of plantations. Location. Mill development. Infrastructure. Compliance with applicable law.

It was assessed during Main Assessment and units specified in time bound plan has been certified.

Yes

2.3.3 Have there been any changes since the last audit? Are they justified?

Only new NPP being conducted Yes

2.3.4 If there have been changes, what circumstances have occurred?

None. Yes

2.3.5 Have there been any stakeholder comments?

No negative comments from stakeholders regarding disputes of land and operational of PT. Agrowiratama.

Yes

2.3.6 Have there been any newly acquired subsidiaries?

No N/A

2.3.7 Have there been any isolated lapses in the implementation of the plan?

The company has adhered time bound plan and completed certifying all units.

Yes






2.3.8 Has there been any systematic failure to proceed with the implementation of the plan?

All subsidiaries has been certified Yes

2.3.9 General statement as to progress made since the last audit:

PT Agrowiratama was certified on 17th

June, 2010. The subsidiaries of PT Agrowiratama are: - PT Sukajadi Sawit Mekar was certified on

28th

August, 2010. - PT Maju Aneka Sawit & PT Globalindo

Alam Perkasa were certified on 17 June 2011.

- PT. Agrowiratama Sambas I (NPP on 07 January 2011 – 06 February 2011).

- PT. Mulia Indah (NPP on 25 August 2011 – 24 September 2011).

- PT. Agrowiratama Sambas II (Plan for NPP 2012/2013)

Yes

2.4 Un-Certified Units or Holdings

NOTE: Companies may demonstrate compliance by clear evidence of a self-audit (i.e. an internal audit for all subsidiaries, estates and Palm Oil Mills)

Section Requirement Findings and any action required

2.4.1 Did the company conduct an internal audit? If so, has a positive assurance statement been produced?

The company has been conducted internal audit and positive assurance statement and all the subsidiaries has been certified successfully.

2.4.2 No replacement after dates defined in NIs Criterion 7.3 of:

Primary forest.

Any area identified as containing High Conservation Values (HCVs).

Any area required to maintain or enhance HCVs in accordance with RSPO criterion 7.3.

PT. Sukajadi Sawit Mekar (certified on 28 August 2010) PT. Maju Aneka Sawit & PT. Globalindo Alam Perkasa (certified on 17 June 2011) PT. Agrowiratama Sambas I (NPP on 07

th January 2011 –

06th

February 2011) PT. Mulia Indah (NPP on 25

th August 2011 – 24

th September

2011) PT. Agrowiratama Sambas II (Plan for NPP 2012/2013)

2.4.3 Any new plantings since January 1st

2010 must comply with the RSPO New Plantings Procedure.

Any new planting by PT Agrowiratama will adhere to the RSPO New Planting Procedures.

2.4.4 Any Land conflicts are being resolved through a mutually agreed process, e.g. RSPO Grievance procedure or Dispute Settlement Facility, in accordance with RSPO criteria 6.4, 7.5 and 7.6.

No any land conflict.

2.4.5 Any Labour disputes are being resolved through a mutually agreed process, in accordance with RSPO criterion 6.3.

No any labour disputes

2.4.6 Any Legal non-compliance is being resolved in accordance with the legal requirements, with reference to RSPO criteria 2.1 and 2.2.

The company has complied with the legal requirements.






2.5 Summary of the findings for Partial Certification

The audit team assessed compliance with the above requirements during this audit. Failure to address any non-compliance identified may lead to certification suspension.

Under partial certification the main company and all its subsidiaries has been certified according to the initial time bound plan.

2.6 Partial Certification Audit Agenda

Date Location Agenda

19th April 2012 PT Agrowiratama office

Document review on PT. Agrowitama Sambas I, PT. Mulia Indah, PT. Agrowitama Sambas II

PART 3: AUDIT PROCESS

3.1 About the Certification Body

Control Union Certifications is a member of the Control Union World Group - an international inspection and certification body. CU performs Audits and certification in many agricultural based fields such as FSC, RSPO, and Organic production, Sustainable Textile Production, Organic Exchange, GLOBALGAP, HACCP, BRC, GMP and GTP. CU is accredited by the Dutch Council of Accreditation (RVA) on the European quality standard EN 45011 for the inspection and certification of CU Organic program (according to the EU regulation 2092/91) and EUREPGAP program. When requested a copy of the accreditation certificate can be obtained from CU.

3.2 Audit Team

Lead auditor: Simon Selvaraj

Team member 1: Haeruddin

Team member 2: Selvanathan

Team member 3: Vishal Shinde

3.2.1 Qualifications of the Lead Auditor

Requirement Qualifications

A minimum of post high school (post-secondary school) training in either agriculture/forestry, environmental science or social sciences;

Post graduate qualification in agriculture with more than 5 years working experience in plantation.

At least 5 years professional experience in area of work relevant to the assessment (e.g., palm oil management; agriculture/forestry; ecology; social science);

More than 5 years working experience in plantation. Involved in RSPO auditing since November 2010. Fully trained in similar agriculture certification programmes such as RSPO SCCS, Global Gap, ISCC and GMP.

Training in the practical application of the RSPO criteria, and RSPO certification systems;

Involved in RSPO assessment since November 2010. Member of CUC RSPO audit team. Involved in audits conducted in Malaysia and Indonesia.

Successfully completion of an ISO 9000:19011 lead auditors course;

Completed ISO 9001:2008 lead auditor course in July 2011. Successfully completed RSPO Lead Auditor Course.

Training in the practical application of RSPO certification systems.

Member of CUC RSPO audit team since November 2010. Involved in audits conducted in Malaysia and Indonesia since November 2010 in 10 different companies in Malaysia and Indonesia.

A supervised period of training in practical auditing against the RSPO criteria or similar sustainability standards, with a minimum of 15 days audit experience and at least 3 audits at different organisations.

Post graduate qualification in agriculture with more than 5 years working experience in plantation.

RSPO endorsed lead auditors course. Completed RSPO Lead Auditor training in 2011

Signed code of conduct. Yes.






General knowledge of: Yes

RSPO P&C standards. Yes

CUC organizational structure. Yes

CUC quality systems. Yes

Lead auditor role. Yes

Report writing. Yes

Stakeholder consultation. Yes

Certification decision process. Yes

RSPO SCCS program manual. Yes

CUC filing systems. Yes

Correct use of RSPO trademarks. Yes

History and objectives of RSPO. Yes

CV available. Yes

Completion of CUC RSPO lead auditor training. Completed & Passed RSPO Lead Auditor training in 2011

3.2.2 Qualifications of the Assessment Team RSPO Requirement Team Member Name Qualifications

Fluent in main local languages and English.

Haeruddin Fluent in local language (Indonesian citizen) and able to understand English.

Selvanathan Able to understand local language and fluent in english.

Field working experience in the palm oil sector, or a demonstrable equivalent.

Haeruddin Professional forester and oil palm plantation since 1995. Experience in RSPO, 4C, Global Gap, FSC, UTZ certified, and Organic farming auditing.

Selvanathan SA 8000 advanced auditor, QMS, EMS & OHSAS Lead Auditor, Working experience in oil palm plantation.

Vishal Shinde Deg. Horticulture, Dip in Food Industry Management, QMS , FSMS , Bonsucro , RTRS & ISCC auditing.

Good agricultural practices (GAP), integrated pest management (IPM), pesticide and fertilizer use.

Haeruddin Professional forester and oil palm plantation since 1995. Experience in audit RSPO, 4C, Global Gap, FSC, UTZ certified, and Organic farming auditing.


Vishal Shinde Deg. Horticulture, Dip in Food Industry Management, QMS , FSMS , Bonsucro , RTRS & ISCC auditing.

Health and Safety auditing on the farm and in processing facilities. (For example OHSAS 18001 or occupational. Health and safety assurance system).



Workers welfare issues and social auditing experience. (For example with SA8000 or related social or ethical accountability codes).



Environmental and ecological auditing. (For

Haeruddin Professional forester and oil palm plantation since 1995. Experience in audit FSC, 4C, FSC, UTZ certified, Global






example experience with organic agriculture, ISO 14001 or environmental management systems).

Gap, Organic farming auditing. Completely ISO 14001-EMS lead auditor training in December 2010.


Economic issues. Haeruddin Professional forester and oil palm plantation since 1995. Experience in audit RSPO, 4C, Global Gap, FSC, UTZ certified, and Organic farming auditing.


3.3 Audit Methodology

3.3.1 General Overview

The Audit was carried out in conformity with the procedures as laid down in the CUC Procedure Manual and the RSPO Program Manual for the assessors and Certifier. During the Audit the qualified CUC assessors used the RSPO standard as endorsed for the country in which the Audit took place and recorded their findings. For each estate and smallholder identified to be included in the sample for this audit, the original main Audit checklist was used, which includes any updates from previous Annual Surveillance Audits (ASA). Workers and local communities were interviewed and evidence sought to confirm ongoing compliance to include:

Chemical stores. Storage. MSDS leaflets. Herbicide mixing areas. PPE. Ventilation. Security.

Field inspections. Herbicide application programmes. Harvesting sites and efficiency. Fertilising operations. SOP’s. Soil maps. Land preparation. Ground cover. IPM. First aiders and boxes. Ground cover. Soil erosion. Field observations of all operations.

Worker interviews. OSH. Sexual, religious, racial harassment. Pay and contracts. Child labour. First aid. Awareness.

Re-planting sites. Zero burn.

HCV’s. Identification. Management plans. Environmental Impact Assessments. Implementation.

Riparian zones. Width. Current and future management. Non maintenance regimes.

Water management. Water courses. Water monitoring.

Road maintenance. Run off.

Social amenities. Social Impact Audits.

Local communities. Contributions made. Employment opportunities. Social impacts. Complaints procedures.

Workshops. Oil traps. Safe working environment. PPE. Diesel tanks. Environmental waste management.

Line sites. Interviews with householders. Inspection of water discharge points. Water improvement plans. Waste disposal.

Documentation review. Palm Oil Mill audits include:

Mill and workshop inspections. Documentation. Worker interviews.

Mill. SOP’s. Safe working environment. Gen sets. Walk ways. Signs. EFB. POME treatment. Emissions. Mass balance. Diesel tanks. PPE. Fire extinguishers. First aiders and boxes. Fuel and water usage.

OSH. Training. Management structure. First aiders.

Full document review. Completion of the checklist. Review and documentation of evidence. All aspects of RSPO P&C’s applicable.

Worker interviews. OSH. Sexual, religious, racial harassment. Pay and contracts. Verification: Verification of implementation was done through field observations, workshop and chemical store inspections, worker and community interviews and mill inspections as summarised above.






3.3.2 Audit Agenda

17 th

April 2012

Location: PT. Agrowiratama’s office

Time: 14.30 -15.30

Auditors: Purpose:

Simon Selvaraj Haeruddin Selvanathan Vishal Shinde

Opening meeting. Introduction by team leader. Introduction of team members and assessment agenda.

Presentation by PT. Agrowiratama

Location: PT. Agrowiratama’s office

Time 15.30 – 17.30

Auditors: Purpose: Auditors: Purpose:

Haeruddin, Selvanathan and Vishal: Doc. Review of Mill Simon Selvaraj Mill SCCS verification audit

18th

April 2012

Location: PT. Agrowiratama’s office, Estate, KKPA Scheme smallholders and POM

Time: 08.00 – 17.00

Auditors: Purpose:

Haeruddin and Vishal Shinde Document review of estate, mill and KKPA Scheme smallholders.

Location: Estate, KKPA Scheme smallholders and POM

Time: 08.00 – 17.00

Auditors: Purpose:

Selvanathan, Simon selvaraj

Field inspections. Herbicide application programmes. Harvesting sites and efficiency. Fertilising operations., Land preparation. Ground cover. IPM. First aiders and boxes. Ground cover. Soil erosion. Field observations of all operations.

Worker interviews. OHS. Sexual, religious, racial harassment. Pay and contracts. Child labour. First aid. Awareness.

HCV’s. Identification. Management plans. Environmental Impact Assessments. Implementation.

Riparian zones. Width. Current and future management. Non maintenance regimes.

Boundaries inspection.

Water management. Water courses. Water monitoring.

Social amenities. Social Impact Assessments.

Local communities. Contributions made. Employment opportunities. Social impacts. Complaints procedures.

Chemical stores. Storage. MSDS leaflets. Herbicide mixing areas. PPE. Ventilation. Security.

Fertilizer store.

Workshops.

Line sites. Interviews with householders. Inspection of water discharge points. Water improvement plans. Waste disposal.

Interview with community and stakeholder.

OSH. Training. Management structure. First aiders

Mill and workshop inspections. Worker interviews (OSH. Sexual, religious, racial harassment. Pay and contracts.), Safe working environment. Gen sets. Walk ways. Signs. EFB. POME treatment. Emissions. Mass balance. Diesel tanks. PPE. Fire extinguishers. First aiders and boxes. Fuel and water usage.

19th

April 2012

Location: PT. Agrowiratama’s office.

Time: 08.00 – 12.00

Auditors: Haeruddin, Selva and Simon






Purpose: Interview KKPA Scheme smallholders member


Time: 13.00 – 16.30

Auditors: Purpose:

Simon, Haeruddin, Selvanathan and Vishal Auditors findings and input


Time: 16.30 – 17.00

Auditors: Purpose:

All auditors Closing meeting

Number of auditors participating: 4 Number of days spent for the audit on site: 3 Total number of person days used for the audit on site: 12

PART 4 ASSESSMENT FINDINGS

4.1 Lead Assessor’s Summary and Recommendation for Certification

The mill and supply base are as per the above table 1.5 and 1.7.1 and the Scheme smallholders visited was assessed at field, office, facilities, store and document review carried out in accordance to the RSPO principles and criteria. Common systems were identified and specific evidence was recorded for individual estate and mill. Interviews with Estate Managers, Mill Manager, and Scheme leaders, committee and members of workers union took place in both formal and informal environments and worker interviews were conducted in all estates and in the mill. Subsequent to the stakeholders’ interview, the surrounding communities were visited so as to capture more feedback from the stakeholders. A night audit on social aspects was carried out by the social expert and the lead auditor to gather more information from the workers as more family members are around to give comments and positive comments were received. There were no complaints received during the field assessment and during interview with the external stakeholders. Up to the time of writing this report, there were neither feedbacks nor comments received from the other external stakeholders and community leaders. Under partial certification rules, it is found that all its subsidiaries have been certified and further clarification is specified in table 2 onwards. The mill is fully verified for RSPO SCCS system verification and it is found to be in full compliance. See table 5. With full commitment towards RSPO P&C and RSPO SCCS implementation, it is therefore the recommendation of the lead assessor that: To sustain the certificate of compliance.

Signed:

Name: Simon Selvaraj Date: 19

th April 2012






4.2 Summary of the findings by principle and a sample of the Criteria

Over the 5 year period of the life of the certificate, there will be 4 annual surveillance audits

Identified Non-Conformities and noteworthy Positive and Negative Observations.

The RSPO require that this report contains findings by each principle and some example criteria. Please see table below.

Sample Criterions used during this Annual Surveillance Assessment

The following sample criterions were audited during this Annual Surveillance Assessment

Principle 1: Commitment to Transparency

Criterion Sampled by Surveillance Summary

All information requests from stakeholder were listed and recorded by the mill and estate. Follow up of request and information was recorded and maintained in “Record of Information request’ which made by each estate and mill. List of management documents which are available publicly is shown. The list covering legal documents, environmental, health & safety and social issues.

ASA 1,2,3 & 4 1.1 There are 22 (January 2011- April 2012) information request in mill and 37 information request in the estate since the last audit till now. Response of information was recorded in the same book of information request. All information request had been addressed timely manner. The retention of all documents according the policy company no. AGR-POD/01.01/1.4.0, dated 01 February 2011 are 2 years for financial and operational document, 1 year for labour document, 7 years for research and survey document and until expired for legal document and document no. MM-POD/01.01/6.30, dated 11 January 2011 are 10 years retention for financial, operational, SCCS and ISCC document, 1 year for labour document.

ASA 1,2,3 & 4 1.2 List of management documents which are publicly available has been made for both estate and mill. The list covered legal documents, environmental, health safety and social issues. The legal documents, included Izin Lokasi (Location permit), Ijin Prinsip (Principle permit), Izin Usaha Perkebunan (Plantation operation permit), HGU (Land title rights) and the environmental documents for environmental and social impact assessment known as DPPL (Dokumen Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan). Environmental management and monitoring plan (RKL/RPL) was submitted to the Environmental Department of District Pasaman Barat per semester and the financial documents are categorised as confidential documents. The retention of all documents are as mentioned above.

Principle 2: Compliance with Applicable Laws and Regulations

Criterion Sampled by Surveillance

Summary

All the relevant legal documents are available as per main assessment. During this second annual assessment it is noted that all the permits are valid as per local, national and international regulation. All legal requirement comply with the regulations and laws, including those related to land status, occupational health and safety, environmental, labor, agricultural practice, and mill operation. SOP, implementation of applicable laws: the public relations department in Head office and on the sites track all changes in applicable laws through: 1. Association of palm oil companies;; 2. Through website of ILB (Indonesia Law Briefing – hukumonline.com); 3. Following seminars relating to industry; 4. External lawyer consultations; 5. Regular visits to government bodies. PT. Agrowiratama has fulfilled the legal requirements as covered in document: AGR-LGC/03.01/1.2 and AGR-LGC/02.01/1.0 (Legal Corespondences). A mechanism to ensure compliance with relevant legal requirement covered in procedure No. AGR-SOP/01.01/5.2 (Implementasi Undang-Undang yang Berlaku) dated 24 January 2008. Preparing checklist of the relevant laws and regulations;






Public Relation team regularly check and monitor the implementation of the law in every unit of estate and mill every 6 (six) months appropriate with the list of law prepared. There are 6 regulation has been analyzed from May 2011 – March 2012, i.e: regulation of Peraturan Perusahaan (Company regulation) and Perjanjian kerja Bersama (PKB) from Transmigration and Manpower Ministry, has been analysis and implemented.

Principle 3: Commitment to Long-Term Economic and Financial Viability


Summary The company has implemented management plan to achieve long term economic and financial viability as described in their working plan.

ASA 2 & 4 3.1 Working plan for 10 years from 2012- 2021 has been documented in economic policy No. AGR-RSPV/03.01/1.2 Rev. 06, dated 02 January 2012 covering: production of FFB, CPO, PK, income from selling CPO and PK, OER, operation cost, and training plan. No replanting was planned in the coming years (replanting to take place in 2015).

Principle 4: Use of Appropriate Best Practices by Growers and Millers


Summary

The company has plantation procedures from buying seedlings (nursery stage), land preparation through to harvesting and replanting in estate and procedures on receiving FFB until despatch of CPK/PK in mill, the procedures has been implemented and documented for all stages of activities both plantation and mill. The procedures were regularly review and where necessary will be revised as per present operational requirement. Restore of the riparian zone along the river by planting jungle trees and observing the zone by no chemical applications. Beneficial plants were planted for IPM. (Mucuna bracteata, antigonon leptosus). Fertilizer data can be found on application and realisation book. Soil and Foliar analysis is carried out annually.

ASA 2 4.2 Soil surveys are conducted for all plantations. Leaf analysis yearly. The results were used as fertilizer recommendation based on leaf and soil analysis. Soil and leaf analysis done by PT Salim laboratory in Pekanbaru. Record of fertilizer and land application is on daily basis and reported every month.

ASA 2 4.6 List of approved agrochemical by Agriculture Minister year 2011 and list of WHO clasification.available and documented. During audit found that all pesticides which has been used by the company conform with list of agrochemical. Record of pesticides can be found by monthly report in “Rencana dan Realisasi Kerja 2012”. Estate Operation file number 6.1 contains details on up keep of mature areas including usage of chemicals and number of people working with the chemicals. Stock cards are being kept in the chemical warehouse and recorded in the Daily chemical dispense book and person in charge who handle pesticides storages and the workers which applying in field are experienced and trained. Logbook of chemical waste collection available, collection agent PT Binasamsurya Mandala putra which has been approved by Ministry of Environment No. 294, year 2010. Agrochemicals are used in such a way that does not endanger health or the environment. There is no prophylactic use, and where agrochemicals are used that are categorized as World Health Organization Type 1A or 1B, or are listed by the Stockholm or Rotterdam Conventions, growers are actively seeking to identify alternatives, and this is documented, The medical check up is conducted half yearly for all workers that involve in spraying and fertilizer application.






Principle 5: Environmental Responsibility and Conservation of Natural Resources and Biodiversity


Summary Implementation which based on the SEIA report, regular report (RKL/RPL), HCV assessment and GAP procedures has fully responsible and well take place by the company.

ASA 2 5.1 Document of enviromental impact assessment including social impact assessment known as DPPL (Dokumen Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan) has been approved by Governor of West Sumatera No. 1566, 2008, dated 27 October 2008, no revision of DPPL due to no changes occured in the operational of PT. Agrowiratama. Document of RKL (Environmental Management Plan) and RPL (Environmental Monitoring Plan) have been submitted to local authority (Bapedalda) regularly (every 6 month), e.g. Report of RKL-RPL semester II (July – December 2011) The document available in places, the evidence that it has been submitted is confirmation letter from local authority.

ASA 2 5.5 Zero burning sign boards erected wherever necessary which are fire risk. According field inspection and photograph evidence that the company has commitment to prevent land fire.Sign boards were checked every month by Supervisor and every 3 month conducted by Audit and Certification, Estate Department. The company a has policy to anticipation and prevent land fire were covered in policy document “Antisipasi dan Pencegahan kebakaran Lahan No. AGR-POD/ 01.01/5.5.0 date 1 October 2006, which mention procedure of prevent land fire and handling if any land fire.

Principle 6: Responsible Consideration of Employees and of Individuals and Communities by Growers and Millers


Summary

Positive and negative information from the DPPL is documented and a management plan is developed to address any negative impacts. Half yearly, monitoring report is incorporated with the organization (RKL/RPL). Communication and consultation with local community through monthly gathering and social activities. Communication and consultation with the stakeholders is evident. Minutes of the meeting are recorded. Complaint procedure is similar to the estate and complaint book and suggestion box available need to further filled and used as a reference. Flow chart of the procedure is posted on the notice board to create and ensure awareness among the members. FPIC was implemented to resolve of any complaint and disputes.

ASA 2 6.4 Procedures for the identification, calculation and compensation for the loss of legal or customary rights of the land no. AGR-SOP/01.01/1.0 “Ganti Rugi Lahan”. No negotiations concerning compensation for loss of legal or customary rights are as per this assessment period

ASA 2 6.6 Seen policy recognizing freedom of association established. Communicated and displayed and publically available. Minutes of meeting with any labour documented well, such as: attendance list, summary of minutes meeting, photograph evidance, i.e the last meeting conducted on 3 March.2012; headed by Nispan (Head of Labour Union)

ASA 2 6.10 The price of FFB is fixed by the agricultural department and circular issued by the agricultural department every month, the latest circular was on 29 March, 2012 with reference number 521.3/482/PPH-2/III-2012. The smallholders are aware of the process. The payment to contractor is completed. Last payment sighted paid on 25 June 2011; approved and signed James Tamba, Acting GM. Record of price is available and showed variation between the year of plantings. All parties understand with the contracts, this was confirmed by interview with Mr Nasran, Head of Koperasi Sawit Bersama [Naswan, Nazwar, H.Damhuri] and Mr Surja.. The MoU between PT Agrowiratama and KKPA signed on 11 March 2004. Seen Surat Perjanjian 001/AHJ/L27/IV/2012 for “Racking” between KKPA and Nasrul Effendi as the contactor . Working agreement between POM and contractor followed all the regulations.






Contract 001-HO/SKL/B21/X11/2009 with contractor CV. Wahana Utama to build 1 unit of office at Jorong Sikilang.

Principle 7: Responsible Development of New Plantings


Summary Not Applicable (NA)

Principle 8: Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Key Areas of Activity


Summary The commitment for continual improvement was seen through innovation system involving all levels within the organization.

ASA 1,2,3 & 4 8.1 A monitoring and evaluation of environment and social aspect covered in RKL/RPL. Review consists of result of the action plan, evaluations, recommendation for next improvement. Planted Beneficial plant (antigonon leptosus) to reduce using chemical pesticides (covered 1,140 ha) and Trembesi (samanea saman) tree to maintain riparian zone (303 trees). Adding new Bacho-loader (1 unit), miniexcavator (1 unit) and Compactor (1 unit) to maintain drainage to reduce erosion. Improvement water weirs to maintain water table. Installation turbin 1400 kW (1 unit) for reduce consumption fosil fuel. A CDM project (instalation of Biogas plant) to develop methane capture plant to reduce the emission,,started on January 2012 and will be operational December 2012 and also weightbridge (1 unit). Building of new housing for staffs and workers 84 units in 2011 – March 2012, ATM (Automatic Teller Machine) for all workers and establishing cooperative for workers to improve social amenities.

4.3 Sample Criteria for inclusion in this Report on an Annual Basis during the Lifetime of the Certificate

Criterion Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Criterion Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4

1.1 x x x x 6.1 x

1.2 x x x x 6.2 x

2.1 x 6.3 x

2.2 x 6.4 x

2.3 x 6.5 x

3.1 x x 6.6 x

4.1 x 6.7 x

4.2 x 6.8 x

4.3 x 6.9 x

4.4 x 6.10 x

4.5 x 6.11 x x

4.6 x 7.1 x

4.7 x 7.2 x

4.8 x 7.3 x

5.1 x 7.4 x

5.2 x 7.5 x

5.3 x 7.6 x

5.4 x 7.7 x

5.5 x 8.1 x x x X

5.6 x






4.4 Non-conformity register and reports on previous NCs

This section gives an over view of new or revised non-conformities raised during this audit and of action taken to close out non-conformities raised during the previous audits.

If a minor-non-conformity raised at the last audit, is not closed out, then this will be raised to Major status and the company given 60 days to close this out.

The NC number is comprised of 2 parts to include the year in which the NC was raised as well as a sequential number.

4.4.1 Annual Audit NC Summary

Annual Audit Date: 17th

– 19th

April 2012

Number settled: Nil

Number outstanding: Nil

4.4.2 Status of non-conformities (both Minor and Major) previously identified, even if already Closed Out

NC number: Nil

Category: Nil

Aspect of standard: Nil

Evidence of NC: Nil

Comment at ASA: Nil

4.5 Non-Conformity Report for NC identified during this ASA

NC number: Nil

Client name: Nil

Date raised: Nil

Major or Minor: Nil

Raised by: Nil

Aspect of standard:

Evidence of non-conformity:

Assessors Signature

Date

4.6 Observations

Client name: Nil Date raised: Nil Raised by: Nil

Assessors Signature

Date






4.7 Issues that were raised during the Stakeholder Consultation and Company Responses

The subjects raised and responses by the company will be reviewed at the first annual surveillance audit. Subsequent annual surveillance audit reports will include any subjects raised during the period of certification and during the annual surveillance audit.

Subject raised Company response and proposed action to be taken

Audit team findings

Stakeholder – Mr Nasran [Head of Village/Culture] of Jurong Air acknowledged the good participation of the company and the stakeholders.

- Positive comment

Worker's representatives highlighted that there are no any labour disputes.

- Positive comment.

PART 5: RSPO SUPPLY CHAIN CERTIFICATION

The palm mill mentioned in the scope of the audit was audited against the requirements of the following: RSPO Supply Chain Certification Systems. November 2011. RSPO Supply Chain Certification Standard. November 2011. As required, a separate SCC report and recommendation for certification has been prepared.

5.1 POM included in the scope of the audit

CU code: Name of facility: Location address: Supply chain model:

POM PT. Agrowiratama Jorong Air Haji, Kecamatan Sungai Aur, Kabupaten Pasaman Barat, Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Indonesia

IP,SG,MB

5.2 Summary report including a brief description of the scope of certification

PT Agrowiratama palm oil mill and its supply base including the KKPA Scheme Smallholder was certified on 17th June 2010. The mill processing capacity is 45 ton FFB per hour. Since the only supply base and the small holders has been certified the whole complex use supply chain model of IP. However, the company has its own downgrading method if a buyer demands for other model. The last sales were from year 2010-2011 March. After 1st surveillance audit there were no sales of actual certified amount up to this audit date. The company has sold the certificates to Green Palm as per below detail and found that they maintained good accounting system where it shows no double or triple claiming. The company sells CSPK to a Kernel Crushing Plant which belongs to PT Wira Inno Mas where further process to CSPKO & CSPKE is being carried out. There is no outside crop at all till this moment.

5.3 Confirmation of the company’s summary of annual certified volume of RSPO certified Palm Oil or Palm Kernel Oil

over a specified period

Product: CPO mt

PK mt

Specified 12 month period:

CU Code

POM 50,958 6,038 For CPO -17 June 2011 – 31 March 2012 + estimated prod April – 16th

Jun 2012

5.4 Final certification decision by Control Union for the RSPO SCCS Audit

Recommendations made: Yes

Summary of non-compliances: Full compliance was found.

Certification status of client: The POM included in the scope of this audit demonstrated full compliance with the RSPO SCCS. With effect from the certification date given in the RSPOPC certificate, this POM mentioned in the scope of this report is considered to be certified in accordance with the RSPO SCCS.






PART 6: CERTIFIED ORGANISATION’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INTERNAL RESPONSIBILITY

6.1 Date of next ASA

The provisional date for the next ASA is: April 2013

6.2 Date for Closure of Non-Conformities

See sections above for details of NC’s, if any

All major NCs to be closed by: -

All minor NCs to be closed by: -

6.3 Signing by the Client

I the undersigned, being the most senior relevant management representative of the operation seeking or holding certification, agree with the contents and audit findings as presented in this document . I also confirm:

Acceptance of liability in execution of the instructions given.

That this company was made aware that the findings of the audit team are tentative; pending review and decision making by the duly designated representatives of Control Union Certifications.

That during the closing meeting all agenda items was covered by the Lead Auditor.

Acknowledged by:

Name: Dr Gan Lian Tiong

Position: Head of Sustainability,

Date: 19th

April, 2012 Signature

6.4 Signing by the Lead Auditor

I the undersigned, being the Lead Auditor, confirm that this report is an accurate record of the findings and of the closing meeting. I further confirm that the summary of the findings as presented in this report are a true representation of the actual findings of the audit team.

Acknowledged by:

Name: Simon selvaraj

Position: Lead Auditor

Date: 19th

April, 2012 Signature

6.5 Signing by the Certifier

I the undersigned, being the Certifier, confirm that the information and conclusions included in this report have been prepared in good faith and that the certification decision has been based upon this information.

Acknowledged by:

Name: Gerben Stegeman

Position: Certifier

Date: 01st

May 2012 Signature






PART 7: APPENDICIES

Appendix 1: Location Map for this Certification Unit

From 1.9, the location map(s)

Map 1: Map showing the location of estates (PT. Agrowiratama) in Indonesia.






Map 2 : Map showing the location of PT Agrowiratama in West Sumatra.






Map 3: Map showing the location of the estate, KKPA Scheme samllholders, POM and neighboring entities.

Appendix 2: Information on the RSPO Certificate

The following information shall be reflected on the RSPO Certificate issued by Control Union Certifications

Appendix 3: RSPO P&C Summary Sheet

The following summary information is used by RSPO Secretariat

Appendix 4: List of Abbreviations

BRC British Retail Consortium

CHRA Chemical Health Risk Assessment

CoC Chain of Custody

CPO Crude Palm Oil

CSR Corporate Social Responsibility

CU Control Union

CUC Control Union Certifications

DOE Department of Environment

EFB Empty Fruit Bunch

EIA Environment Impact Assessment

ERT Endangered Rare or Threatened species






EU European Union

EUREPGAP Euro-Retailer Produce Good Agricultural Practices

FFB Fresh Fruit Bunch

FSC Forest Stewardship Council

FSC COC Forest Stewardship Council Chain of Custody

FSC FM Forest Stewardship Council Forest Management

GGL Green Gold Label

GMP Good Manufacturing Practice

GOTS Global Organic Textile Standard

GTP Good Trading Practice

GPS Global Positioning System

HACCP Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point

HCV High Conservation Value

HCVF High Conservation Value Forest

IPM Integrated Pest Management

JAS Japanese Agricultural Standard

MDC MDC Publishers Sdn Bhd ( Company Name)

MSDS Material Safety Data Sheet

NC Non Conformity

OE Organic Exchange

OSH Occupational Safety and Health

OSHAS Occupational Safety and Health Assessment Scheme

P&C Principle and Criteria

PEFC Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification

PK Palm Kernel

POME Palm Oil Mill Effluent

PPE Personal Protective Equipment

RSPO Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

RSPO NI Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil National Interpretation

SA8000 Social Accountability 8000

SIA Social Impact Assessment

SOCSO Social Security Organisation

SOP Standard Operating Procedure

USDA/NOP United States Department of Agriculture – National Organic Program

MT Metric Tonnes

WHO World Health Organizations

Date post:	20-Mar-2019
Category:	Documents
Upload:	lykiet
View:	217 times
Download:	0 times

RSPO audit Report · Annual Surveillance Assessment Report Report Number CU813182 ... 3.2.1...

Documents