+ All Categories
Home > Documents > RSW Year 1 Results

RSW Year 1 Results

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: damon
View: 54 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
RSW Year 1 Results. What we saw. 132 classroom observations 185 reading strategies 61 Socratic Seminars or Fishbowls 146 examples of argumentative or informational writing. Survey Says…. Survey Says…. Use of Before, During, and After Strategies. 14%. Now part of my teaching practice. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
19
RSW Year 1 Results
Transcript
Page 1: RSW Year 1 Results

RSW Year 1 Results

Page 2: RSW Year 1 Results

What we saw132 classroom observations185 reading strategies61 Socratic Seminars or

Fishbowls146 examples of argumentative

or informational writing

Page 3: RSW Year 1 Results

Survey Says…N=88 Average Number of

Times Assigned Spring Semester

Assigned non-textbook readings to your students aligned to content standards.

9.13

Assigned before reading strategies to prepare students for non-textbook readings

6.29

Assigned during reading strategies to prepare students for non-textbook readings

6.98

Assigned after reading strategies to help students synthesize what they have read.

7.36

Page 4: RSW Year 1 Results

Survey Says…N=88 Average Number of

Times Assigned Spring Semester

Conducted Socratic Seminars over content related topics.

3.55

Conducted Fish bowl or other types of teacher facilitated class discussions over content related topics

4.69

Assigned a piece of argumentative writing over a content related topic

4.82

Assigned a piece of informational writing over a content related topic

6.2

Page 5: RSW Year 1 Results

Use of Before, During, and After Strategies

42%

2%12%

17%

14%

12%

I have to make a conscious effort, but it works when I do it.

Now part of my teaching practice Other

Done occasionally, when I remember.

Trying, but no success.

Just can’t, so not going to try.

Page 6: RSW Year 1 Results

Comments – Reading StrategiesI do it when it is appropriate and

neededI have to make a conscious effort

to do it. It works less than 1/4 of the time

I DO IT. HOWEVER, IT IS DIFFICULT BECAUSE IT TAKES UP A LOT OF VALUABLE TEACHING TIME

I really like it and enjoy using the methods. I really need to have the time to integrate it into my lessons

Page 7: RSW Year 1 Results

Use of Socratic Seminar or Fishbowl

31%

9% 32%

15%

3%

10%

I have to make a conscious effort, but it works when I do it.

Now part of my teaching practice

Done occasionally, when I remember.

Trying, but no success.

Other

Just can’t, so not going to try.

Page 8: RSW Year 1 Results

Comments Discussion Classroom discussion occurs every day - it is called teaching I have to make a conscious effort to do it - the discussion works this has been difficult for my 6th grade students. I have tried it

several times, but I do not see great gains from it. I do not feel confident attempting when students refuse to complete

the before, during, and after reading strategies My Special Ed small group classes have trouble with the higher

order thinking and have become frustrated with the seminar and fish bowl. They are doing okay with the reading and anticipation log. The writing a summary have had to modify to writing a few sentences

There are other better ways to have class discussions than Socratic Seminars with groups of 35 apathetic students.

Harder to complete in the first year of RSW, but see it could be easier later

Fishbowl works much better. With 35 students, and a small room, it is logistically impossible for me to arrange the classroom in a circle. When we have Socratic Discussions, they do not happen in a circle formation.

Page 9: RSW Year 1 Results

Use of argumentative writings aligned with readings and seminar discussions

27%

16%16%

1%

14%26%

I have to make a conscious effort, but it works when I do it.

Now part of my teaching practice

Done occasionally, when I remember.

Trying, but no success.

Other

Just can’t, so not going to try.

Page 10: RSW Year 1 Results

Use of Informational Writing aligned with readings and seminar discussions

36%

27% 10

%

10%

1%

15%

I have to make a conscious effort, but it works when I do it.

Now part of my teaching practice

Done occasionally, when I remember.

Trying, but no success.

Other

Just can’t, so not going to try.

Page 11: RSW Year 1 Results

Comments WritingWorks well in conjunction with ELA teacherI have to make a conscious effort to do it -

the writing is a disaster. Many students either refuse to do it at all or the writing is so pitiful it is incomprehensible

I did this less, but it was successfulIt really works with those students who

bought in to it. Plus they enjoyed reading or hearing their writings read to the class.

I want to more fully integrate it into my classes.

Page 12: RSW Year 1 Results

Major Challenges

70%

44% 19%

16%

42%

22%

24%

Grading writing assignments

Time to get it all done.

Classroom management

Printing / Copying readings

Process not necessary

Other

Finding readings

Page 13: RSW Year 1 Results

Comments – Major Challenges student apathy

getting students comfortable with putting their thoughts on paper. They prefer discussion to writing.

Too much new stuff all at once Too Demanding when non-textbook reading is assigned. There

should not be a set number that has to be done each unit. Filing the work in their folders. Right now I only have about 90

students, next year when I have twice the number of students it will be even harder!

The differing levels of readers and writers and the time it takes for them to complete the task

have had plenty of time to do/respond to readings, but the seminars take more effort and time than I have to make these meaningful, content related, experiences.

Keeping a filing/evidence system children cannot read and comprehend the material. Therefore

taking a long time to complete.

Page 14: RSW Year 1 Results

Student Response

50%

22% 2%

8%

7%

11%

Neutral

Dissatisfied Very

DissatisfiedOther

Very SatisfiedSatisfied

Page 15: RSW Year 1 Results

How did you teach content literacy before RSW

62%

4%

9%

27%

21%

45%

We had informal class discussions.

Students read articles without reading strategies.

Only informational writing

Only argumentative writing

Other

I did none of the RSW components.

Page 16: RSW Year 1 Results

Comments – Content Literacy Before RSW I did it my way and EOCT scores improved We would read current articles and use online forums to host

discussions. Students were exposed to the real world application, would carry on legitimate discussions in a way that was easy for even the quietest to get their point across, and I had paperless completion grades (the intention was engagement in the presented information, not an assessment of knowledge). I can no longer fit this in with the county mandated RSW instructions, and have therefore lost some passion for including content literacy.

I have used non-textbook articles for years and facilitated classroom discussion over it. Now I have to document it for the powers that be which is another use of my time unrelated to students.

I gave outside of text material and a variety of writing assignments but never pigeon holed what the students got or turned in other than having it all be aligned with the standards

Content literacy is an integral part of AP instruction, and fundamental to the goals of the course, so I have always done it. I have always used primary sources in non-AP instruction as well, but was not limited by having to document every time I did it, so it happened more organically. The filing and documentation process takes some of the joy out of teaching using primary sources.

Page 17: RSW Year 1 Results

What do you think?

Page 18: RSW Year 1 Results

RSW Summer Collaboration6-12 Science and Social Studies TeachersWednesday, May 29 – Thursday, May 30,

20138:30 am – 3:30 pmSocial Studies – Rutland High School

Media CenterScience – Hutchings Career CenterStipends will be paidSign-up on PD Express

Page 19: RSW Year 1 Results

Collaboration Priorities?


Recommended