+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR...

Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR...

Date post: 10-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
41
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 4, 2017 DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC. (Name of registrant in its charter) Nevada 000-53577 03-0606420 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 27680 Franklin Road Southfield, MI 48034 (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant's telephone number: (248) 223-9160 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: [ ] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act [ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act [ ] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2). Emerging growth company If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Transcript
Page 1: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT 

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 4, 2017 

 DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.

 (Name of registrant in its charter)

 

         

Nevada   000-53577   03-0606420(State or other jurisdiction of

 incorporation)  (Commission File Number)

 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

   27680 Franklin RoadSouthfield, MI  48034    

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant's telephone number:   (248) 223-9160

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

[   ]    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act [   ]    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act [   ]    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act [   ]    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act

 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR §230.405) orRule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR §240.12b-2). Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new orrevised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Page 2: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Earnings Release

On May 4, 2017, Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAUC) (the "Company") issued a press release announcing earnings and other financial results for the quarterended March 26, 2017. A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and incorporated here by reference. Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure

The Company has prepared presentation materials (the “Investor Presentation”) that management intends to use during its previously announced First Quarter 2017 Conference callon Friday, May 5, 2017 at 10:00 am Eastern Time, and from time to time thereafter in presentations about the Company’s operations and performance. The Company may use theInvestor Presentation, possibly with modifications, in presentations to current and potential investors, analysts, lenders, business partners, acquisition candidates, customers,employees and others with an interest in the Company and its business.

A copy of the Investor Presentation is furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is available on the Company's website athttp://www.diversifiedrestaurantholdings.com/investors/events-and-presentations/default.aspx. Materials on the Company's website are not part of or incorporated by reference intothis Form 8-K.

In accordance with General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K, the information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, shall not be deemed to be “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not beincorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expresslyset forth by specific reference in such filing.

Item 9.01 Financial Statement and Exhibits(d) Exhibits

Exhibit No.      Description

99.1 Press Release of Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. reporting financial results and earnings for the quarter ended March 26, 2017

99.2 Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. Investor Presentation dated May 4, 2017

 SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereuntoduly authorized. 

Page 3: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANTHOLDINGS, INC.  

       

Dated:  May 4, 2017 By:  /s/ Phyllis A. Knight  

  Name: Phyllis A. Knight  

 Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal   

Financial and Accounting Officer)    

Page 4: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No. Description

99.1 Press Release of Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. reporting financial results and earnings for the quarter ended March 26, 2017

99.2 Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. Investor Presentation dated May 4, 2017

Page 5: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE     

Diversified Restaurant Holdings Reports First Quarter 2017 Results

SOUTHFIELD, MI, May 4, 2017 -- Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SAUC) ("DRH" or the "Company"), the largest franchiseefor Buffalo Wild Wings ® ("BWW") with 64 stores across five states, today announced results for its first quarter ended March 26, 2017 .

First Quarter Highlights (from continuing operations)

• Revenue increased 2.8% to $44.3 million• Same-store sales were (0.3%)• Achieved net income of $0.8 million, or $0.03 per diluted share• Restaurant-level EBITDA of $8.4 million, or 19 .0 % of sales (1)

• Adjusted EBITDA was $6.2 million, or 13.9% of sales (1)

• Total debt, net of cash, reduced $3.0 million in the first quarter(1)  See attached table for a reconciliation of GAAP net income to Restaurant-level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

“Our first quarter results were encouraging and not only validate our decision to focus solely on the BWW business, but demonstrate thestrength of the franchise in the face of continued market headwinds,” commented David G. Burke, President and CEO. “Our promotionalefforts, such as Half-Price Wing Tuesdays® helped to improve traffic while our delivery service continues to provide incremental sales. TheBlazin' Rewards®   loyalty program, which has now been rolled out to all 64 locations, continues to attract customers and drive higher ticketsfor those customers that actively participate in the program.”

There were two favorable calendar shifts in the quarter, Christmas and Easter, which positively impacted same-store sales 170 basis points.

Mr. Burke added, “Our core Midwest markets are performing quite well, while our Florida market remains challenged, particularly in thesouthern end of our franchise area. And, while restaurant-level margins were pressured during the period as a result of all-time high wingcosts and promotional activity, we maintained our disciplined approach to managing costs, produced high operating margins and continue toachieve industry-leading restaurant performance.”

1

Page 6: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

First Quarter Results (Unaudited)              ($ in thousands) Q1 2017   Q1 2016   Change   % ChangeRevenue $ 44,338.0   $ 43,143.3   $ 1,194.7   2.8 %Operating income $ 2,366.6   $ 3,116.0   $ (749.4)   (24.0)% Operating margin 5.3 %   7.2 %        Net income from continuing operations $ 795.6   $ 1,292.4   $ (496.8)   (38.4)%Diluted net income per share (cont. ops.) $ 0.03   $ 0.05   $ (0.02)   (40.0)%               Same-store sales (0.3)%   (2.2)%                       Restaurant-level EBITDA (1) $ 8,424.6   $ 9,294.2   $ (869.6)   (9.4)% Restaurant-level EBITDA margin 19.0 %   21.5 %        Adjusted EBITDA (1) $ 6,157.7   $ 7,183.9   $ (1,026.2)   (14.3)% Adjusted EBITDA margin 13.9 %   16.7 %        

(1) Please see attached table for a reconciliation of GAAP net income to Restaurant-level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

Balance Sheet Highlights - Continuing Operations

Cash and cash equivalents were $5.4 million at March 26, 2017 , compared with $4.0 million at 2016 year-end. Total debt decreased $1.6million to $119.6 million at the end of the first quarter. Capital expenditures were $1.4 million and were primarily for one restaurant underconstruction and restaurant refreshes and remodels. Capital expenditures were $6.4 million in the first quarter of 2016 .

Fiscal 2017 GuidanceThe Company expects the following in 2017:

• Revenue of $173 million to $178 million• Restaurant-level EBITDA of $33 million to $36 million• Adjusted EBITDA between $23.5 million to $26.5 million• Capital expenditures of approximately $4 million to $6 million

• One new restaurant: currently in development and expected to open in the second quarter• Two to four remodels: planned at approximately $0.6 million each

Webcast, Conference Call and Presentation

DRH will host a conference call and live webcast on Friday, May 5, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Time, during which management will reviewthe financial and operating results for the first quarter, and discuss its corporate strategies and outlook. A question-and-answer session willfollow.

The teleconference can be accessed by calling (201) 389-0879. The webcast can be monitored at www.diversifiedrestaurantholdings.com . Apresentation that will be referenced during the conference call is also available on the website.

2

Page 7: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

A telephonic replay will be available from 1:00 P.M. ET on the day of the call through Friday, May 12, 2017. To listen to the archived call, dial(412) 317-6671 and enter replay pin number 13659679, or access the webcast replay at www.diversifiedrestaurantholdings.com , where atranscript will also be posted once available.

About Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc.Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. is the largest franchisee for Buffalo Wild Wings Grill & Bar with64 BWW franchised restaurants in key markets in Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Missouri. The Company routinely posts news andother important information on its website at www.diversifiedrestaurantholdings.com .

Safe Harbor StatementThe information made available in this news release and the Company’s May 5, 2017 earnings conference call contain forward-looking statements which reflectDRH's current view of future events, results of operations, cash flows, performance, business prospects and opportunities. Wherever used, the words "anticipate,""believe," "expect," "intend," "plan," "project," "will continue," "will likely result," "may," and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements as such term isdefined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual growth, results of operations,financial condition, cash flows, performance, business prospects and opportunities could differ materially from historical results or current expectations. Some ofthese risks include, without limitation, the impact of economic and industry conditions, competition, food and drug safety issues, store expansion and remodeling,labor relations issues, costs of providing employee benefits, regulatory matters, legal and administrative proceedings, information technology, security, severeweather, natural disasters, accounting matters, other risk factors relating to business or industry and other risks detailed from time to time in the Securities andExchange Commission filings of DRH. Forward-looking statements contained herein speak only as of the date made and, thus, DRH undertakes no obligation toupdate or publicly announce the revision of any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events, developments orchanged circumstances or for any other reason.

Investor and Media Contact:Deborah K. PawlowskiKei Advisors [email protected]

FINANCIAL TABLES FOLLOW

3

Page 8: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended

    March 26, 2017   March 27, 2016

Revenue   $ 44,337,964   $ 43,143,252

Operating expenses      

Restaurant operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below):        Food, beverage, and packaging costs   13,038,426   12,059,759

Compensation costs   10,965,530   10,520,246

Occupancy costs   2,893,852   2,766,459

Other operating costs   9,029,876   8,573,747

General and administrative expenses   2,356,966   2,174,291

Pre-opening costs   31,370   123,443

Depreciation and amortization   3,633,254   3,762,102

Loss on asset disposal   22,059   47,224

Total operating expenses   41,971,333   40,027,271

         Operating profit   2,366,631   3,115,981

         Interest expense   (1,575,954)   (1,444,940)

Other income, net   27,167   39,742

         

Income from continuing operations before income taxes   817,844   1,710,783

Income tax expense   (22,264)   (418,354)

Income from continuing operations   795,580   1,292,429

         

Discontinued operations        Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes   36,535   (1,423,704)

Income tax (expense) benefit of discontinued operations   (995)   561,679

Income (loss) from discontinued operations   35,540   (862,025)

         

Net Income   $ 831,120   $ 430,404

         Basic earnings (loss) per share from:        Continuing operations   $ 0.03   $ 0.05

Discontinued operations   $ —   $ (0.03)

Basic net earnings per share   $ 0.03   $ 0.02

Diluted earnings (loss) per share from:        Continuing operations   $ 0.03   $ 0.05

Discontinued operations   $ —   $ (0.03)

Diluted net earnings per share   $ 0.03   $ 0.02

         

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding    

Basic   26,629,974   26,298,034

Diluted   26,629,974   26,298,034

4

Page 9: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)

    March 26,   December 25,

ASSETS  March 26,

2017(UNAUDITED)   2016

Current assets      

Cash and cash equivalents   $ 5,382,263   $ 4,021,126

Accounts receivable   88,456   276,238

Inventory   1,631,565   1,700,604

Prepaid and other assets   992,732   1,305,936

Total current assets   8,095,016   7,303,904

         

Deferred income taxes   16,410,956   16,250,928

Property and equipment, net   54,817,201   56,630,031

Intangible assets, net   2,586,563   2,666,364

Goodwill   50,097,081   50,097,081

Other long-term assets   231,455   233,539

Total assets   $ 132,238,272   $ 133,181,847

         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT    

Current liabilities    

Accounts payable   $ 4,121,332   $ 3,995,846

Accrued compensation   1,980,366   2,803,549

Other accrued liabilities   2,893,239   2,642,269

Current portion of long-term debt   11,313,759   11,307,819

Current portion of deferred rent   194,206   194,206

Total current liabilities   20,502,902   20,943,689

         

Deferred rent, less current portion   2,043,552   2,020,199

Unfavorable operating leases   571,171   591,247

Other long-term liabilities   3,570,054   3,859,231

Long-term debt, less current portion   108,263,169   109,878,201

Total liabilities   134,950,848   137,292,567

         

Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3, 11 and 12)    

         

Stockholders' deficit     Common stock - $0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 26,636,346 and 26,632,222, respectively, issued andoutstanding   2,611   2,610

Additional paid-in capital   21,489,849   21,355,270

Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (769,778)   (934,222)

Accumulated deficit   (23,435,258)   (24,534,378)

Total stockholders' deficit   (2,712,576)   (4,110,720)

         

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit   $ 132,238,272   $ 133,181,847

5

Page 10: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended

    March 26, 2017   March 27, 2016

Cash flows from operating activities    

Net income   $ 831,120   $ 430,404

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations   35,540   (862,025)

Net income from continuing operations   795,580   1,292,429

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities        Depreciation and amortization   3,633,254   3,762,102

Amortization of debt discount and loan fees   52,443   50,880

Amortization of gain on sale-leaseback   (34,794)   (39,302)

Impairment and loss on asset disposals   22,059   47,225

Share-based compensation   123,082   97,426

Deferred income taxes   23,259   317,225

Changes in operating assets and liabilities that provided (used) cash        Accounts receivable   187,782   (309,327)

Inventory   69,039   (13,670)

Prepaid and other assets   313,204   240,947

Intangible assets   (18,915)   46,107

Other long-term assets   2,084   (8,792)

Accounts payable   (208,157)   (289,041)

Accrued liabilities   (577,438)   (942,775)

Deferred rent   23,353   24,124

Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations   4,405,835   4,275,558

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations   35,540   (1,163,832)

Net cash provided by operating activities   4,441,375   3,111,726

         Cash flows from investing activities    

Purchases of property and equipment   (1,430,201)   (6,405,269)

Net cash used in investing activities of continuing operations   (1,430,201)   (6,405,269)

Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations   —   (1,101,142)

Net cash used in investing activities   (1,430,201)   (7,506,411)

         

Cash flows from financing activities    

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt   1,217,621   3,311,231

Repayments of long-term debt   (2,879,156)   (7,500,000)

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan   11,498   10,707

Net cash used in financing activities   (1,650,037)   (4,178,062)

         

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   1,361,137   (8,572,747)

         

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   4,021,126   13,499,890

         

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period   $ 5,382,263   $ 4,927,143

         

6

Page 11: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESReconciliation between Net Income and Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Restaurant-Level EBITDA

       

  Three Months Ended (Unaudited)  March 26, 2017   March 27, 2016Net lncome $ 831,120   $ 430,404 + (Income) loss from discontinued operations (35,540)   862,025 + Income tax expense 22,264   418,355 + Interest expense 1,575,954   1,444,940 + Other income, net (27,167)   (39,743) + Loss on asset disposal 22,059   47,224 + Depreciation and amortization 3,633,254   3,762,102

EBITDA $ 6,021,944   $ 6,925,307 + Pre-opening costs 31,370   123,443 + Non-recurring expenses (Restaurant-level) 14,300   71,184 + Non-recurring expenses (Corporate-level) 90,097   63,954

Adjusted EBITDA $ 6,157,711   $ 7,183,888 Adjusted EBITDA margin (%) 13.9%   16.7%

+ General and administrative 2,356,966   2,174,291 + Non-recurring expenses (Corporate-level) (90,097)   (63,954)

Restaurant–Level EBITDA $ 8,424,580   $ 9,294,225 Restaurant–Level EBITDA margin (%) 19.0%   21.5%

Restaurant-Level EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of non-restaurant specific general and administrative expenses, restaurant pre-opening costs,loss on property and equipment disposals, depreciation and amortization, other income and expenses, interest, taxes, and non-recurring expenses related toacquisitions, equity offerings or other non-recurring expenses. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of restaurant pre-opening costs, loss onproperty and equipment disposals, depreciation and amortization, other income and expenses, interest, taxes, and non-recurring expenses. We are presentingRestaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, which are not presented in accordance with GAAP, because we believe they provide an additional metric bywhich to evaluate our operations. When considered together with our GAAP results and the reconciliation to our net income, we believe they provide a morecomplete understanding of our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. We use Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA together withfinancial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, such as revenue, income from operations, net income, and cash flows from operations, to assess ourhistorical and prospective operating performance and to enhance the understanding of our core operating performance. Restaurant-Level EBITDA and AdjustedEBITDA are presented because: (i) we believe they are useful measures for investors to assess the operating performance of our business without the effect ofnon-cash depreciation and amortization expenses; (ii) we believe investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness;and (iii) they are used internally as benchmarks to evaluate our operating performance or compare our performance to that of our competitors.

7

Page 12: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

Additionally, we present Restaurant-Level EBITDA because it excludes the impact of general and administrative expenses and restaurant pre-opening costs, whichis non-recurring. The use of Restaurant-Level EBITDA thereby enables us and our investors to compare our operating performance between periods and tocompare our operating performance to the performance of our competitors. The measure is also widely used within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurantlevel productivity, efficiency, and performance. The use of Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as performance measures permits a comparativeassessment of our operating performance relative to our performance based on GAAP results, while isolating the effects of some items that vary from period toperiod without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. Companies within our industry exhibit significantvariations with respect to capital structure and cost of capital (which affect interest expense and tax rates) and differences in book depreciation of property andequipment (which affect relative depreciation expense), including significant differences in the depreciable lives of similar assets among various companies. Ourmanagement team believes that Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA facilitate company-to-company comparisons within our industry by eliminatingsome of the foregoing variations.

Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to netincome, income from operations, net cash provided by operating, investing, or financing activities, or other financial statement data presented as indicators offinancial performance or liquidity, each as presented in accordance with GAAP. Neither Restaurant-Level EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA should be considered as ameasure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not becomparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and our presentation of Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construedas an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual items. Our management recognizes that Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA havelimitations as analytical financial measures.

###

8

Page 13: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

Q1 2017 Financial Results   May 4, 2017   

Page 14: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

2   Safe Harbor   The information made available in this presentation contains forward-looking statements which   reflect the Company’s current view of future events, results of operations, cash flows,   performance, business prospects and opportunities. Wherever used, the words "anticipate,"   "believe," "expect," "intend," "plan," "project," "will continue," "will likely result," "may," and   similar expressions identify forward-looking statements as such term is defined in the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and   uncertainties and the Company's actual growth, results of operations, financial condition, cash   flows, performance, business prospects and opportunities could differ materially from historical   results or current expectations. Some of these risks include, without limitation, the impact of   economic and industry conditions, competition, food and drug safety issues, store expansion and   remodeling, labor relations issues, costs of providing employee benefits, regulatory matters,   legal and administrative proceedings, information technology, security, severe weather, natural   disasters, accounting matters, other risk factors relating to our business or industry and other   risks detailed from time to time in the Securities and Exchange Commission filings of DRH.   Forward-looking statements contained herein speak only as of the date made and, thus, DRH   undertakes no obligation to update or publicly announce the revision of any of the forward-  looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events, developments or   changed circumstances or for any other reason.   

Page 15: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

Who We Are   NASDAQ: SAUC   IPO: 2008   Market capitalization $76M   Largest Buffalo Wild Wings Franchisee   › Leading operator   › Strong cash generator   › 64 BWW locations   › Recent share price $2.87   › 52 week range $0.70 - $2.96   › Insider ownership 49%   › Institutional ownership 12%   › Shares outstanding 26.7M   3       Pure play franchisee with scale and track record of accretive acquisitions   Market data as of May 1, 2017 (Source: Bloomberg, LP); Ownership as of most recent filing   

Page 16: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

First Quarter Highlights   Sales up 2.8% to $44.3M   Two new Florida restaurants in 2017 vs. 2016   Same Store Sales off 0.3%, compared to industry decline of 1.7%   Adjusted EBITDA of $6.2M, 13.9% of sales   Restaurant-level EBITDA of $8.4M, 19.0% of sales   Strong cash from operations and FCF   Net cash from operations of $4.4M and free cash flow of $3.0M for the quarter   Cost of sales up 140 basis points vs. Q1 2016 as wing prices were high throughout the quarter (some relief   expected in Q2) and traffic-driving promotional activity weighed heavily on margins   Lower margin on higher restaurant-level expenses   Substantial improvement vs. prior 4 quarters driven by improved traffic but partially offset by declining average   check resulting from increased discount activity; aided by favorable calendar   4   Sales   S-S-S   EBITDA   Margins   Cashflow   

Page 17: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

Sales and Traffic   5   

Page 18: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

6   Traffic was a strong positive in Q1 2017 – driven in part by increased promotional activity resulting   in a negative effect on average check   NOTE: Average check is predominantly driven by price but is also influenced by product mix and, to a lesser extent, average guests per check.   2.6% 2.9%   5.5%   5.9%   7.7%   4.1%   1.3%   0.8%   -2.2%   -2.7% -1.8%   -5.4%   -0.3%   4.3%   3.0%   -3.1%   0.9% 1.1%   2.2%   0.2%   0.6%   -2.5%   -1.8% -2.0%   -2.0%   -3.0%   -3.3%   -4.3%   2.0%   1.1%   -3.0% -3.2%   1.7% 1.7%   3.3%   5.7%   7.1%   6.6%   3.1%   2.8%   -0.2%   0.2%   1.4%   -1.1%   -2.3%   3.2%   6.1%   0.1%   Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016  SSS%  Traffic %  Avg Check %  Average Check and Traffic Trends   

Page 19: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

 Delivery   • Delivery available at nearly half the system in Q2 (29 locations)   • Implementing increased menu pricing for delivery in Q2    Blazin’ Rewards   • Completed roll out across entire network in Q1 2017   • Aggressive training and education initiatives   • Bounce back coupon for sign-up    Other initiatives   • Promotions (Half-Price Wing Tuesdays, BOGO Blitzes)   • Large parties and catering   • 15-Minute lunch   7   Sales and Traffic-Driving Actions   

Page 20: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

8   Delivery   External Sales as % of Total   26 Locations   In Q3 2016, DRH aggressively pursued partnerships with regional and national delivery services   to increase kitchen utilization and drive incremental sales – delivery channel is showing strong   growth and to date we see no evidence that delivery sales cannibalize carry-out sales   Delivery Drives Incremental Sales    2017 delivery sales expected to reach   $1.5-$2M; 26 Q1 delivery locations with an   additional 3 in Q2    Average delivery check is 13% higher than   dine-in and 17% higher than carry-out       20.6%   19.3% 19.5%   20.4%   21.9%   1.9% 2.7% 2.8%   Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017  % of Carry-Out Sales % of Delivery Sales  

Page 21: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

9   Blazin’ Rewards Loyalty Program   Blazin’ Rewards Members   After a strong pilot of the new Blazin’ Rewards program in our 18 St. Louis area locations,   we rolled out the program to all 64 locations in Q1 2017   -  5,000  10,000  15,000  20,000  25,000  30,000  35,000  40,000  45,000  50,000  29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15  Week 2016 2017   Successful Pilot Leads to Full Rollout    Blazin’ Rewards pilot program rolled   out in 18 St. Louis area locations in   July 2016    In Q1 2017 all remaining locations   rolled out the Blazin’ Rewards program    As of April 2017, over 44,000 DRH   guests were enrolled in the program    Average loyalty check currently   20% higher than non-loyalty   

Page 22: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

10   Half-Price Wing Tuesday Promotion   Tuesday SSS % Trends Half-Price Wing Tuesday Promo   -3.4%   8.9%   15.5%   6 Week Prior to  Promo  Post Promo 2016 Post Promo 2017  YTD  The half-price wing Tuesday promotion has proven to drive significant traffic throughout all   dayparts on an otherwise lower volume day – contribution margin on incremental sales over 50%   Leveraging various media to promote:    Sport, Talk and Music Radio    Pandora®    Digital Media    Outdoor    In-store digital (Rockbot®) & POP   

Page 23: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

Margins and EBITDA   11   

Page 24: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

12   Quarterly Restaurant EBITDA Trends   1 – On June 29, 2015, we acquired 18 locations in the St. Louis market to add to our existing 44 units, which had a dilutive AUV of $2.3 million   2 – FF = Franchise-related fees which includes 5.0% royalty and 3.0 – 3.15% NAF (national advertising fund)   Both margins and AUV’s sequentially improved in Q1 2017; cost of sales up on increased   promotional activity and higher wing costs   AUV ($M) $3.1 $2.8 $2.7 $2.7 $2.7 $2.6 $2.6 $2.6 $2.8 $2.8 $2.8 $2.6   21.8% 20.6% 19.4% 20.3% 21.5% 20.0% 19.6% 16.5% 19.0%   21.2% 20.4% 19.4%   5.5% 5.9% 6.4% 6.6%   6.5% 6.8% 7.0%   7.2%   6.5%   5.2% 6.2% 6.8%   8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0%   8.2% 8.1% 8.1%   8.1%   8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.1%   12.6% 13.4% 13.0% 12.7%   11.5% 12.1% 13.3%   14.0% 12.3%   13.2% 12.9% 12.7%   23.3% 23.9% 25.1% 24.8% 24.4% 25.2% 24.7% 25.0% 24.7% 23.8% 24.4% 24.8%   28.8% 28.1% 28.1% 27.6% 28.0% 27.9% 27.4% 29.2% 29.4% 28.5% 28.1% 28.1%   KEY Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 FY2014 FY 2015 FY 2016  C  O  S   LA  B  O  R    OPE  X    FF2   OCC   R  ES  T.    EB  IT  D  A    1   

Page 25: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

13   Cost of Sales Impacts   Q1 2016  COS %  Bone-In Wing  Costs  Wing Yield 1/2 Price Promo St. Louis  Boneless Promo  Boneless Wing  Costs  Alcohol Costs Sales Mix/  Waste/Other  Food Costs  Q1 2017  COS %  28.0%   0.35%   0.25%   0.43%   0.30% 0.24%   0.35%   29.4%   0.08%   Historically high traditional (bone-in) wing costs and lower yields, coupled with the Half-Price   Wing Tuesdays promotion, drove 103 of the 140 basis point increase in COS % in Q1 2017   

Page 26: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

28.8%   28.1% 28.1%   27.6%   28.0% 27.9%   27.4%   29.2% 29.4%   28.5%   28.1% 28.1%   21.7%   20.1%   20.4%   19.5%   20.3%   20.9%   19.5%   23.5%   24.0%   18.4%   20.4%   21.1%   $1.89   $1.77   $1.80 $1.79   $1.92 $1.92   $1.70   $1.95   $2.02   $1.53   $1.81   $1.87   Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016  Total COS % Wing Cost % of Total COS Wing Cost/Lb  14   COS Trends and Wing Impact   NOTE: Wing prices are the average price paid per pound of fresh, jumbo chicken wings – including distribution costs   (approximately $0.29 per pound)   Traditional wing costs hit record highs in Q1 2017 and have trended higher in early Q2;   wings as % of total COS spiked to 24.0%   

Page 27: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

15   Historical Wing Prices   Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec   $ / lb. Fresh Jumbo Chicken Wing Spot Prices   Source: Urner Barry Comtell™ UB Chicken – Midwest Jumbo Wings   NOTE: Logistics cost to restaurants is $0.29 / lb. over the spot price   Volatile fresh wing prices have ranged between $1.41 and $1.87/lb. since 2015; early Q2 upward   trend is not typical   $0.75  $0.95  $1.15  $1.35  $1.55  $1.75  $1.95  2014 2015 2016 2017  

Page 28: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

16   Cost of Sales Actions    Testing revised Wing Tuesday promotion in markets we control   (40 stores - Tampa, St. Louis, N. Michigan)   • Eliminating the “half-off” concept   • Introducing “BOGO” (buy one / get one free)   • Limiting to two sizes with higher margin – snack and small    Discontinued the “Half-off Boneless Thursdays” promotion that was   tested in the St. Louis market (return to “70¢ Boneless Thursdays”)   • Incremental traffic on an already stronger day not sufficient to justify the   higher cost of the “half-off” promotion   • “70¢” per wing price reduces the cost of the promotion    Menu price increase of 1.8% effective May 2017    Increasing all prices on delivery menu by 10% effective May 2017       

Page 29: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

17   Total Labor Trends   NOTE: OH = Overhead labor costs including payroll taxes, FUTA, SUTA, health benefits and retirement plan.   Bonus is typically between 1.0-1.2% of sales.   Hourly and total labor costs continue to be held in check as we push productivity initiatives   as a means of offsetting wage inflation   23.3%   23.9%   25.1% 24.8% 24.4%   25.2% 24.7% 25.0% 24.7%   23.8%   24.4% 24.8%   12.5% 13.2%   13.8% 13.3% 13.1% 13.6% 13.3% 13.6% 13.1% 12.9% 13.2% 13.4%   5.6%   6.0%   6.4%   6.4% 6.2%   6.4% 6.6% 6.6% 6.6%   5.8% 6.1%   6.5%   5.2%   4.7%   4.9% 5.2% 5.1%   5.1% 4.8% 4.8% 5.1%   5.1%   5.0%   4.9%   Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016  Hourly Labor % of Sales Mgmt Labor % of Sales Bonus & OH % of Sales  

Page 30: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

18   Adjusted EBITDA Trends   21.8%   20.6%   19.4% 20.3%   21.5% 20.0% 19.6%   16.5%   19.0% 21.2% 20.4% 19.4%   4.3%   8.0%   5.8% 5.1%   5.0% 5.7% 5.7%   5.8%   5.3% 5.1% 5.7% 5.6%   Key Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 FY2014 FY 2015 FY 2016  G&  A    R  ES  T.  EB  IT  D  A    G&A expenses increased with the St. Louis acquisition in 2015 and we have not yet driven   leverage against the higher costs – plan to drive G&A toward 5.0% by 2H 2017   

Page 31: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

19   G&A Impacts   G&A expenses were higher than our target of 5% of net sales in Q1 2017 as sales slightly lagged   expectations – initiatives in place to drive reduction toward targeted range for remainder of 2017   Q1 2016  G&A %  Support Expense Support Salaries Marketing Q1 2017  G&A %  5.0%   0.4% 0.5%   5.3%   0.2%   

Page 32: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

20   G&A Actions    Targeting second half run rate of 5% even at low end   of sales guidance   • $1 million run rate savings target      Post – Bagger Dave’s spin-off overhead restructuring   coupled with tight spending controls   • Reductions in salaries and support office expenses      Reduced (more targeted) local marketing spend   • Better leveraging of National Ad Fund spend   • More targeted local spend   

Page 33: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

The Future   21   

Page 34: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

22   Value Creation – Going Forward   Value   Proposition   • Best in class operations   • Proven integration skills   • Strong positive cash flow   • Financial strength and flexibility   • Tax benefits to offset over $50 million in pre-tax income   Current   Environment   • Roll-up of other BWW franchisees ready for exit as cycle turns   • Potential for BWLD re-franchising activity   • Opportunities with new franchised concepts   Growth   Strategy   • Disciplined, value-accretive growth through acquisition   • Supplemented by opportunistic new unit development   

Page 35: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

23   Reiterating Fiscal 2017 Guidance1    Revenue of $173 million to $178 million    Restaurant-level EBITDA of $33.0 million to $36.0 million    Adjusted EBITDA between $23.5 million to $26.5 million    Capital expenditures of approximately $4 million to $6 million   • One new restaurant under construction – opening June 2017   • At least two remodels planned for 2017 – targeted at ~$0.6 million each   1 2017 guidance provided as of May 4, 2017   

Page 36: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

24   Free Cash Flow and Net Debt   Net debt / EBITDA target in the range of 4x by the end of 2017 and 3x by the end of 2018   

Page 37: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

Citi Restaurant Seminar   Marcum MicroCap Conference – New York City   Q2 2017 earnings release (call on August 4th)   Dougherty Conference – Minneapolis   25   May 22nd   June 15th   August 3rd   September 19th   Upcoming Investor Relations Calendar   

Page 38: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

Exhibits   26   

Page 39: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

27   EBITDA Reconciliation   

Page 40: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 

28   EBITDA Reconciliation cont.   Restaurant-Level EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of non-restaurant specific general and administrative expenses, restaurant pre-  opening costs, loss on property and equipment disposals, depreciation and amortization, other income and expenses, interest, taxes, and non-recurring   expenses related to acquisitions, equity offerings or other non-recurring expenses. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of   restaurant pre-opening costs, loss on property and equipment disposals, depreciation and amortization, other income and expenses, interest, taxes, and   non-recurring expenses. We are presenting Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, which are not presented in accordance with GAAP, because   we believe they provide an additional metric by which to evaluate our operations. When considered together with our GAAP results and the reconciliation to   our net income, we believe they provide a more complete understanding of our business than could be obtained absent this disclosure. We use   Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA together with financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, such as revenue, income from   operations, net income, and cash flows from operations, to assess our historical and prospective operating performance and to enhance the understanding   of our core operating performance. Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are presented because: (i) we believe they are useful measures for   investors to assess the operating performance of our business without the effect of non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses; (ii) we believe   investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness; and (iii) they are used internally as benchmarks to   evaluate our operating performance or compare our performance to that of our competitors.     Additionally, we present Restaurant-Level EBITDA because it excludes the impact of general and administrative expenses and restaurant pre-opening   costs, which is non-recurring. The use of Restaurant-Level EBITDA thereby enables us and our investors to compare our operating performance between   periods and to compare our operating performance to the performance of our competitors. The measure is also widely used within the restaurant industry   toevaluate restaurant level productivity, efficiency, and performance. The use of Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as performance   measures permits a comparative assessment of our operating performance relative to our performance based on GAAP results, while isolating the effects   of some items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies.   Companies within our industry exhibit significant variations with respect to capital structure and cost of capital (which affect interest expense and tax rates)   and differences in book depreciation of property and equipment (which affect relative depreciation expense), including significant differences in the   depreciable lives of similar assets among various companies. Our management team believes that Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA   facilitate company-to-company comparisons within our industry by eliminating some of the foregoing variations.     Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as an   alternative to net income, income from operations, net cash provided by operating, investing, or financing activities, or other financial statement data   presented as indicators of financial performance or liquidity, each as presented in accordance with GAAP. Neither Restaurant-Level EBITDA nor Adjusted   EBITDA should be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business. Restaurant-Level EBITDA and   Adjusted EBITDA as presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies and our presentation of Restaurant-Level   EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual items. Our management   recognizes that Restaurant-Level EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical financial measures.   

Page 41: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 CFR …d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001394156/addad383... · 2017-05-05 · There were two favorable calendar shifts in

 


Recommended