+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Date post: 08-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: sinjin
View: 23 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking. Earthquake Origins and Seismic Waves. Focus point where earthquake rupture occurs Shallow focus - 70 km or less (80% or more) Deep focus - down to 700 km; often along subduction zones - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
17
Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking
Transcript
Page 1: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Page 2: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Earthquake Origins and Seismic Waves

– Focus point where earthquake rupture occurs

• Shallow focus -70 km or less (80% or more)

• Deep focus -down to 700 km; often along subduction zones

– Epicenter point projected onto the surface from the center of the Earth through the focus

Page 3: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Types of Seismic Waves

• Body waves -travel within the Earth

– Primary or P-waves • Compression • Faster of the two types (5.5-1.5

km/sec)• Passes through solids, liquids, or

gases (sound at 15 Hz)– Secondary or S-waves• Shear waves• Travels only in solids• Velocity ~60% of P-wave velocity

Page 4: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Shaking Amplification

Shaking is affected by:

Seismic wave frequency

Earthquake magnitude

Directivity – direction of fault rupture

Rock material through which seismic wave propagates

Page 5: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Comparing Earthquakes

• Earthquake Magnitude (1935)– Richter Magnitude (MW) • Measures of energy released (30 X increase/ magnitude)• Maximum amplitude 100 km from the epicenter• Logarithmic scale; a 10-fold increase per cm of amplitude

• mb = log10(A/T) + Q(D,h) • MS = log10 (A/T) + 1.66 log10 (D) + 3.30 • Seismograph – S-and P-waves » Magnitude (wave amplitude)» Distance (P-S)

Charles Richter

Page 6: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Richter-TNT Seismic Magnitudes

• 1.0 30 pounds Large Blast at a Construction Site

• 2.0 1 ton Large Quarry or Mine Blast

• 4.0 1,000 tons Small Nuclear Weapon

• 4.5 5,100 tons Average Tornado (total energy)

• 6.0 1 million tons Double Spring Flat, NV Quake, 1994

• 6.5 5 million tons Northridge, CA Quake, 1994

• 7.0 32 million tons Hyogo-Ken Nanbu, Japan Quake, 1995; Largest Thermonuclear Weapon

• 7.5 160 million tons Landers, CA Quake, 1992

• 8.0 1 billion tons San Francisco, CA Quake, 1906

• 8.5 5 billion tons Anchorage, AK Quake, 1964

• 9.0 32 billion tons Chilean Quake, 1960

• 10.0 1 trillion tons San-Andreas type fault circling Earth

• 12.0 160 trillion tons Fault Earth in half through center, OR

Earth's daily receipt of solar energy

Page 7: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Calculating Earthquake Magnitude

• Moment method– Essentially the same as Richter at higher

magnitudes– May be applicable over a wider range of ground

motions than Richter

Mo = µ A D (seismic moment)µ = shear modulus = 32 GPa in crust, 75

GPa in mantleA = LW = areaD = average displacement during rupture

MW = 2/3 log10(M0) - 10.7

Page 8: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Determining Earthquake LocationPakistan Event (2005)

Page 9: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Determining Earthquake Location -P-wave Travel Map From Pakistan

Page 10: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Determining Earthquake Location

Page 11: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Comparing Earthquakes

• Earthquake Intensity – Modified Mercalli Scale– Qualitative way of comparing earthquakes

• Based on perception by people• Damage to buildings

• Varies with distance from the epicenter (unlike Richter or Moment scales)– Radio wave model

Page 12: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Richter Modified Magnitude Mercalli Maximum Intensity (at epicenter) 2 I - II Usually detected only by instruments 3 III Felt indoors 4 IV - V Felt by most people; slight damage 5 VI - VII Felt by all; many frightened and run

outdoors; damage minor to moderate 6 VII - VIII Everybody runs outdoors; damage

moderate to major 7 IX - X Major damage 8+ X - XII Total and major damage

After Charles F. Richter, 1958, Elementary Seismology.

Comparison of Earthquake Scales

Page 13: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Ground Acceleration

Rate of change in horizontal and vertical velocity

Measure with respect to gravity (1 g = 9.8 m/s2)

Building resistance varies with construction (adobe vs.concrete)

Page 14: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Earthquake Risk and Prediction

• Regional Changes in Land Elevation– 1964 Alaskan Quake – 1992 Mendocino, CA

• Long and short term prediction• Estimation of Seismic Risk (maps)• Conditional Probabilities of Future

Earthquakes– Probability maps

• The Loma Prieta quake as probable before 1989

• Failed at San Bernardino in 1992

Page 15: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

EarthquakeHazard Map

Page 16: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

Florida’s Earthquake History

• Basically aseismic (i.e., little activity) since Paleozoic

• Only about 6 "real" earthquakes (until 2006!) – 1879-location unknown; felt in Fla. and Ga. – 1893-Jacksonville – 1933-Palatka – 1945-offshore Miami – 1973-Merritt Island – 1975-Daytona Beach (most recent)

• 1998 Panhandle (Jay fault; epicenter near Brewton,Alabama; MR = 4.5)

Page 17: Rupture, Seismic Waves, and Shaking

2006 Gulf of Mexico Event

More information available at:http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/rrusso/florida_eq.html


Recommended