+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: pablo-alcazar
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 28

Transcript
  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    1/28

    1

    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

    Rutgers University

    Piscataway, New Jersey 08854

    PRESSURE VESSEL DESIGN USING

    COMPOSITE MATERIALS

    GROUP 2

    Graig Fergusson

    David Pons

    Ronnie Nomeir

    Danielle Stephens

    Russell Scola

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    2/28

    2

    Index

    Index . . . . . . . . . 2

    Introduction . . . . . . . . 3

    Geometry and Design Constraints . . . . 6

    Composite Material Design . . . . . 8

    Preliminary Designs . . . . . . 13

    Final Design . . . . . . . . 14

    Materials . . . . . . . . . 15

    Dimensions . . . . . . . . 18

    Construction Procedure . . . . . . . 19

    Design Changes . . . . . . . . 21

    Testing . . . . . . . . . 24

    Original Design Goal . . . . . . . 26

    Future Plans . . . . . . . . 27

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    3/28

    3

    Introduction

    Composite materials are widely used in industry and engineering processes today

    due to their many applications and advantages. A composite material is defined as a

    combination of two or more materials consisting of different properties. This union

    essentially creates a new material with properties that are unique from the beginning

    components. Although they are joined together, a visible separation between the

    individual materials is still present.

    The material utilized for this design project is carbon fibers in an epoxy matrix. It

    will be implemented using lamina sheets of the material. When dealing with composites,

    the term matrix is used to describe the material that surrounds and binds together

    clusters of the stronger material which, in this case, is the epoxy. The carbon fiber is

    known as the reinforcement material. When examined separately, carbon fiber and

    epoxy are quite different materials when their individual properties are viewed. The

    carbon fiber is made out of long, thin sheets of carbon. It is a chemically inert rigid

    material that is difficult to stretch and compress. On the other hand, epoxy is a

    thermosetting plastic, or resin, that is liquid when prepared but hardens and becomes

    rigid (i.e., it cures) when is heated. The setting process is irreversible, so that it does not

    become soft again under high temperatures. Epoxy plastics are good at resisting wear

    and are highly durable when exposed to extreme environments.

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    4/28

    4

    The combination of these two materials into a composite has many advantages.

    Along with holding the fibers together, the matrix is advantageous since it protects the

    carbon fiber from damage by sharing any stress incurred in the element. It also provides

    flexibility to the otherwise rigid material which aides in shaping and molding.

    Composites are more versatile than metals and can be tailored to meet performance needs

    and complex designs. As a whole, the composite has a very high specific strength, which

    means it has a very high strength and low weight. In many cases, the composite is lighter

    than traditional materials for certain applications with comparable strength. The joining

    of the materials provides excellent fatigue endurance concerning the number of load

    cycles and residual fatigue strength that is many times higher than that of metals. In

    addition, the composite has good resistance against, chemicals, acids, water, and varying

    elements. There is very little corrosion which leads to low maintenance costs over long

    periods of time.

    The downside of composites is usually the cost. Although manufacturing

    processes are often more efficient when composites are used, the raw materials are

    expensive. Also, epoxy resins are more expensive than polyester resins and vinyl ester

    resins, but generally produce stronger more temperature resistant composite parts.

    Another usage concern is regarding the materials life-cycle. Since carbon fiber

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    5/28

    5

    reinforced plastics have an almost infinite lifetime, companies need to find means in

    which to recycle the material. The high amount of (often manual) work required to

    manufacture composites has limited their use in applications where a high number of

    complicated parts is required. Composites will never totally replace traditional materials

    like steel, but in many cases they are very useful.

    Carbon-epoxy materials are finding increased structural uses in areas such as

    aerospace, structural engineering, automotive, and sporting goods applications. It excels

    at replacing conventional materials in objects ranging from space shuttle components,

    bridge reinforcements, car body parts, and basketball backboards just to name a few.

    Furthermore, as technology evolves, new uses will be found.

    The primary goal of this design project is to use the knowledge gained about

    composites and their advantages to create a carbon fiber / epoxy pressure vessel. The

    materials utilized in this project will consist of carbon / graphite fibers acting as

    reinforcement in an epoxy matrix formed in several layers or lamina. These materials are

    usually flexible, and can be molded into almost any desired shape; in this case they will

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    6/28

    6

    be molded into a cylinder and then baked in a kiln or high pressure oven until both

    materials mesh together and become a single hard structure. In order to complete this

    goal, a $400 budget will be used to acquire all the materials needed for design.

    Geometry and Design constraints

    A pressure vessel is a container designed to operate at pressures typically over 15

    P.S.I.G. The design of a pressure vessel is entirely reliant upon mechanics of materials.

    Prediction of the ultimate strength of a designed vessel is done using various failure

    theories. When building a pressure vessel out of composite materials, some the theories

    employed to optimize strength and predict failure are the Tsia Hill energy-based

    interaction theory, and maximum stress and strain theory. The forces at applied in the

    different directions of the pressure vessel are directly related to the magnitude of the

    pressure and are given below.

    The stress in the circumferential or hoop direction is given by equation 1.

    [1. Hoop Stress]

    The stress acting in the axial direction is given by equation 2.

    [2. Axial Stress]

    The stress acting on the hemispherical ends is given by equation 3.

    [3. Hemispherical Ends]

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    7/28

    7

    When comparing the stresses at each location, it is clear from the above equations that the

    hoop stress is twice as much as the stress in the hemispherical ends and axial direction.

    This is a big consideration when constructing the design and geometry of pressure vessel.

    The geometry of the pressure vessel is also a very important parameter. For

    practicality issues a conventional pressure vessel shape is ideal. A pressure vessel used

    for nitrous oxide is shown in figure 1 below. This design is effective for conserving

    space and is moderately strong. Unlike the pressure vessels in figure 1, the designed

    vessel will not have any sharp geometry. If strength is the sole concern, the ideal

    geometry would be a sphere. This would virtually eliminate stress being concentrated in

    one area, such as what occurs with sharp geometry. In order to compromise between

    strength and size practicality, the designed pressure vessel employs a cylindrical body

    with curved end caps. The curved end caps provide a smooth transition minimizing

    stress concentrations.

    Due to the potential health hazard involved with high pressure vessels, safety is a

    very important design consideration. If cracking occurs while the pressure vessel is in

    Fig 1

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    8/28

    8

    service blasting effects can occur due to the sudden effects of the expanding gas. There

    can also be fragmentation damage and injury if the vessel completely ruptures. If leakage

    occurs the results can also be severe. Depending on what is contained in the pressure

    vessel poisoning or suffocation can occur. In order to reduce chances of these hazards a

    safety factor of at least two is typically employed. Industrial pressure vessels are used in

    the United States are usually built to one of two pressure vessel design codes. The first

    being the ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), the second is the API

    Standard 620, or the American Petroleum Institute code. This provides guidelines for

    lower pressure vessels that are not covered by the ASME code.

    Pressure vessels used in industry are typically constructed of metals due to their

    high strength and ease of machining. Metals can be formed into virtually any shape,

    making it possible to construct the most effective geometries.

    Composite Material Design

    On normal isotropic materials, it is sufficient to describe their mechanical properties

    using just two engineering constants. Usually the Youngs Modulus and the Poissons

    ratio. However, on anisotropic materials, much more is required to fully describe the

    materials behavior. An anisotropic material is a material that its properties at a specified

    point vary with direction or depend on the orientation of reference axes. For example the

    materials Youngs Modulus in the x-direction might not be the same than in the y-

    direction. For this reason the engineering mechanics of composite materials are a lot

    more complex to study than isotropic materials and most of the isotropic equations do not

    apply to composite materials and must be modified to study such behavior.

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    9/28

    9

    In order to fully describe anisotropic materials, more engineering constants are

    required. In the case of thin lamina where it is assumed to be under a state of 2-

    dimensional plane stress, the engineering constants E1, E2, G12 and !12 are necessary to

    describe the composite materials properties. E1and E2represent the Youngs Modulus in

    the 1-direction and 2-direction respectively, G12represents the shear modulus in the 1-2

    plane and !12 represents the Poissons ratio from 1-2. A unidirectional lamina

    representation is shown in the following figure. All of the properties described above

    hold true in their respective direction, for example, E1 is only applicable in the 1-direction

    or along the direction of the fibers. Some numerical manipulation must be performed in

    order to relate the properties to the corresponding x or y axis.

    Following there are the basic equations that are used in the design of process of

    composite materials.

    If we define a matrix T as :

    Then the following equations can be used to relate the mechanical properties and the

    stress and strain relations with their respective axis:

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    10/28

    10

    !""""#

    $ x

    $ y

    %s

    &''''(

    =

    !""""#

    Qxx Qxy Qxs

    Qyx Qyy Qys

    Qsx Qsy Qss

    &''''(

    !""""#

    )x

    )y

    *s

    &''''(

    !""""#

    $x

    $y

    %s

    &''''(

    =

    !""""#

    Sxx Sxy Sxs

    Syx Syy Sys

    Ssx Ssy Sss

    &''''(

    !""""#

    ) x

    ) y

    *s

    &''''(

    Where:

    !""""#

    Sxx

    Sxy

    Sxs

    Syx Syy Sys

    Ssx Ssy Sss

    $%%%%&

    = inv

    '(((()

    !""""#

    Qxx

    Qxy

    Qxs

    Qyx Qyy Qys

    Qsx Qsy Qss

    $%%%%&

    *++++,

    m = cos(!) and n = sin(!)

    Qxx = m4Q

    11! n

    4Q22 ! 2 m2n2Q12 ! 4 m

    2n2Q

    Qyy = n4Q

    11! m4Q22 ! 2 m

    2n2Q12 ! 4 m2n2Q

    Qxy = m2n2Q11 ! m

    2n2Q22 ! "m4 ! n4#Q12$ 4 m

    2n2Q66

    Qxs = m3nQ11 ! mn

    3Q22 ! mn"m2! n2#Q12! 2mn

    (m2! n2 ) Q66

    Qys = mn3Q11 ! m

    3nQ22 " mn#m2! n2$Q12

    " 2mn (m2! n2 ) Q66

    Qss = m2n2Q11 ! m

    2n2Q22 ! 2 m2n2Q12 " (m

    2! n2 )

    2Q

    And

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    11/28

    11

    Q11 =E1

    1! "12

    "21

    Q22 =E2

    1! "12

    "21

    Q12

    = Q21

    =

    !21E1

    1" !12!21

    =

    !12E2

    1" !12!21

    Q66

    = G12

    Also:

    Sxx

    = m4S11

    ! n4S22

    ! 2 m2n

    2S12

    ! 4 m2n

    2S

    Syy = n4S11

    ! m4S22 ! 2 m2n2S12 ! 4 m

    2n2S

    Sxy = m2n2S11 ! m

    2n2S22 ! "m4 ! n4#S12 $ 4 m

    2n2S

    Sxs

    = m3nS11

    ! mn3S22

    ! mn"m2 ! n2#S12

    ! 2mn

    (m2 ! n2 ) S66

    Sys = mn3S11 ! m

    3nS22 " mn#m2! n2$S12

    " 2mn (m2! n2 ) S66

    Sss

    = m2n2S11

    ! m2n2S22

    ! 2 m2n2S12

    " (m2 ! n2 )2S

    Where

    S11

    =1

    E1

    S22

    =1

    E2

    S12

    = S21

    =!

    "12

    E1

    =!

    "21

    E2S66

    =1

    G12

    With these equations it is now possible to study the mechanics of composite

    materials using traditional, isotropic material equations. In pressure vessel design, it is

    important to find the optimal angle of fiber orientation that will reduce the stress along

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    12/28

    12

    the principal axes (1, 2). This can be achieved with some manipulation of the equations

    above.

    The maximum stress must never become equal or greater than the failure stress of

    the material in its respective axis. In order to ensure safety so that we are able to test the

    pressure vessel, three different strength theories were employed in this design to make

    certain that this condition does not occur. After relating the pressure inside the vessel

    with the stress and strain acting on the lamina, the value for the stress is compared to the

    maximum stress allowable before the material fails. This stress is denoted the Ultimate

    stress or the Failure stress.

    The first strength theory used in the design was the Maximum Stress theory. This

    theory basically ensures that the stress in either the 1 or 2 direction will never exceed the

    Failure Stress in its respective direction. This theory is expressed in the simple following

    equation:

    The design will fail if:

    !1" F

    1 or !

    2" F

    2 or #

    6 " F

    This equation is very useful and simple to employ in the design. The next

    equation used ensures that the maximum strain will not be reach the ultimate strain. This

    theory is called the Maximum Strain Theory is expressed in the following equations.

    The design will fail if:

    !1" #

    12!2$ F

    1 or !

    2" #

    21!1$ F

    2 or % &

    6%$ F

    These equations are very simple and in most cases work very well; however, they

    does not take into account the interaction between these stresses and the strains acting

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    13/28

    13

    together in the design. For that reason, the Energy Based Interaction Theory (Tsai-Hill) is

    used.

    The design will fail if:

    !12

    F12

    "

    !22

    F22"

    #62

    F62 $

    !1!2

    F12

    % 1

    It is then with the application of these three different strength theories that we are

    able to ensure that the design being developed is safe and should provide us with the

    confidence that it will perform as required.

    Design Options

    The preliminary designs for the pressure vessel to be constructed from the carbon

    fiber epoxy material were narrowed down to the five that showed the most potential.

    One of the first proposed designs was to construct the pressure vessel in one piece

    with no end caps. The benefit of this design would be higher strength due to its single

    piece construction. However, the manufacturing process of this design has practicality

    issues. In order to get the correct shape a mould would have to be constructed. The

    lamina sheets would then be wrapped around the mold and baked. Therefore, the

    problem with this design is removing the mold from the finished product.

    The final design a previous group used consisted of a cylindrical tube for the

    vessel body and plastic end caps. Due to the end caps being made out of plastic they

    were much weaker then the carbon fiber epoxy body. The result of using the plastic end

    caps is that when pressure is sufficiently high they crack. Also, since these end caps are

    glued on, failure occurs since the strength is weaker at these points. The final design

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    14/28

    14

    chosen by this group is therefore to construct a cylindrical body, as well as end caps out

    of the carbon fiber epoxy material. The difficulty results in designing the end caps. The

    strongest design is a circular one, which is difficult when working with lamina sheets.

    The lamina sheets resemble a stiff fabric, and forming them into a curved surface would

    be difficult. The final design for these end caps is therefore to use thin strips of the

    material overlapping each other and angled offset from each other. The result is expected

    to resemble the figure below.

    Once there end caps are made, they are then attached to the main cylindrical body.

    The cylindrical body is the easiest to produce during the manufacturing process, since the

    thin composite sheets, being the shape of paper, are easy to mold into a cylinder. In this

    project, and final design, we will be using 6 layers of the composites. This will come into

    play when finding the correct fiber orientation between lamina, since when transforming

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    15/28

    15

    the stresses in the x and y axes to the 1 and 2 axes like in the above figures, must be done

    for each layer.

    Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Cloth

    Unidirectional Carbon fiber cloth will be purchased from Jamestown Distributors in

    Rhode Island. It is sold by the yard and the majority to be purchased will have a width of

    12.5. One yard of 50 inch width cloth will also be purchased to allow 0o 90

    o

    orientation of layers at the end caps. It is estimated that to construct one vessel with the

    planned dimensions six yards of cloth will be necessary. Two vessels will be constructed

    and in order to ensure ample supply of carbon cloth 14 yards of the 12.5 inch width cloth

    will be purchased.

    Valve Connection

    In order to make the connection between the valve and the pressure vessel, a valve

    connector will be machined out of carbon steel. The carbon fiber cloth will be wrapped

    around this part during the construction procedure. The valve connector is shown in

    figure 1.

    Figure 1. Valve Connector

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    16/28

    16

    The valve connector will have a large radius of .5, a small radius of .25, an

    inner diameter of .312, and a length of 2.5. This part will be machined from 1018

    carbon steel starting from rods with a 2 diameter and 3 length. It will be purchased

    from McMaster.

    VALVE

    The valve will also be purchased from McMaster. The one selected is a high pressure

    needle valve with a .5'' pipe, 2.75 length and orifice diameter of .312. The selected

    valve is rated for pressures of up to 10000 Psi. A picture of the valve is shown in figure

    2.

    Figure 2. High Pressure Needle Valve.

    EPOXY

    As is shown later in the construction procedure of this report, the first layer of

    carbon fiber cloth will be cured with epoxy. This will create an impermeable layer which

    will allow testing with water if necessary. One quart of West System 105 epoxy resin

    will be used as well as .44 pints of 206 West System hardener. The hardener will allow

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    17/28

    17

    curing at room temperature. To ensure the correct mixing ratios are used a mini pump set

    made to dispense the correct ratios of hardener and epoxy will also be purchased.

    GEOPOLYMER RESIN

    Aside from the first layer, all layers of carbon fiber cloth will be cured with

    Geopolymer resin. Unlike the epoxy, Geopolymer is an inorganic polymer matrix that is

    resistant to temperatures of up to 1000o

    C. It consists of an Alumina Silicate solution and

    can be cured at room temperature. Organic polymer resins such as the epoxy to be used

    for the first layer soften and ignite at temperatures between 200oC and 600oC. However,

    when compared to the epoxy, the Geopolymer is water permeable and has poor strain

    compensation. This is why the first layer will be cured with epoxy.

    TOTAL COST AND MATERIALS

    Jamestown Distributors

    Component Price

    Amount

    Needed Subtotal

    Carbon Fiber Cloth 12.5 inch wide (cost/yard)$11.01 14.00 $154.14

    Carbon Fiber Cloth 50 inch wide (cost/yard) $26.23 1.00 $26.23

    1 Qt. West System 105 Epoxy Resin $29.80 1.00 $29.80

    .44 Pint West System 206 Resin $13.90 1.00 $13.90

    Epoxy Resin and Hardener Mini Pump Set $10.35 1.00 $10.35

    McMaster

    Carbon Steel Rods 2'' diameter 3'' length $8.75 5.00 $43.75

    .5'' pipe, 2.75'' length High Pressure Needle Valve $46.35 2.00 $92.70

    Civil Engineering Department

    Geopolymer Resin $0.00

    Clay $0.00 Total $370.87

    Table 1. Materials and costs

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    18/28

    18

    PRESSURE VESSEL DIMENSIONS

    The pressure vessel will be constructed around a clay mold with the following

    dimensions. It will have a cylindrical body which is six inches in diameter and 8 inches

    long. It will have spherical end caps with three inch radii, which will make the entire

    mold 14 inches long. Carbon fiber cloth with a thickness of .027 and .033 inches will be

    used, making the minimum thickness of the vessel .162 inches. Overlapping of the cloth

    at the end caps will add an additional 1.44 inches to each end. This will make the total

    length of the vessel 16.88 inches. Figure 3 below shows the dimension of the mold

    which the vessel will be constructed around.

    Figure 3. Mold dimensions

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    19/28

    19

    CONSTRUCTION PROCESS

    The first step in the construction process will be to construct a clay mold. A valve

    connector will then be placed on the clay mold in the center of each spherical end cap.

    Once this is done the carbon fiber cloth which will be used is sold with a width of 12.5

    inches and 50 inches will be cut into strips that are 8 and 1.5 inches wide. The cloth will

    be coated with epoxy and wrapped around the mold length wise, passing over each valve

    connector and completing one layer. The first will be done with epoxy to create a water

    impermeable layer, which will allow more testing options and make it possible to use

    clay when dissolving the mold. This is shown in figure 4 below.

    Figure 4. stage 1 of

    construction sequence .

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    20/28

    20

    The second layer will consist of two stages, the first being to wrap an 8 inch width cloth

    around only the cylindrical body. From this stage forward all the carbon fiber strips will

    be wetted with Geopolymer resin. This stage is shown in figure 3 below.

    Figure 3, stage 2 of construction sequence

    stage 2 (Geopolymer Resin).

    `The second stage will be to wrap 1.5 inch wide strips wetted with Geopolymer resin

    around the end caps and 2 inches of the cylindrical body. The strips will extend 2 inches

    into the cylindrical body to strengthen the interface between the cylindrical body and the

    end caps. This is shown in figure 4 below.

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    21/28

    21

    Figure 4, stage 3 of construction sequence.

    Each time this construction sequence is completed 2 layers of the carbon fiber are added

    to the vessel. Although the construction sequence shown above has a valve connector at

    only one end, one will built into both ends. This will allow the installation of 2 valves,

    giving better circulation when removing the clay. The clay mold will also be constructed

    around a quarter inch diameter rod protruding through each valve connector. When the

    first layer, which will be water impermeable, is complete the rod will be removed and

    water will be circulated through the vessel via the valve connectors at each end. The

    water will dissolve the clay and leave the first layer. The second and third stages of the

    construction sequence will then be completed creating a total of 2 layers. The

    construction sequence will then be repeated using only Geopolymer resin for the

    remaining 4 layers.

    Design Changes

    The first design change was the construction of the mold. Instead of using clay as

    was proposed earlier the mold was constructed using brown sugar. The brown sugar was

    placed in a container with the desired shape and allowed to harden. The design change

    was made in order to ensure easy removal of the mold once the first layer of carbon

    fiber epoxy was completed. When compared to clay the brown sugar dissolve much

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    22/28

    22

    easier in water and was very hard when dry, making it easy to wrap the carbon fiber

    strips around.

    The second design change was the valve connector. Instead of machining the

    whole component from one piece of carbon steel, a tapered .5 inch diameter, 3 inch long

    plumbing nipple, (double threaded short pipe), was used. A circular disk with a 1.4 inch

    diameter was machined from the carbon steel, and threaded to fit the plumbing nipple.

    To ensure strength the disk was welded to the nipple. Figure 5 shows the completed

    valve connector.

    Figure 5.Completed valve connector.

    The third design change was the construction process. Instead of wetting the first

    layer of carbon fiber cloth with epoxy and the remaining 5 layers with Geopolymer

    resin, all six layers were wetted with epoxy. The final layer was wetted with epoxy only

    on the side in contact with the mold and then painted with a Geopolymer Glass/Carbon

    Fiber mixture. This change was made to increase the strength of the vessel. Since the

    Geopolymer adds no tensile strength to the carbon fiber and is very brittle cracking would

    occur. The epoxy was used to ensure added tensile strength and better strain capabilities.

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    23/28

    23

    Instead of using the needle valve mentioned above, a ball valve was used. The

    ball valve is rated for 500 psi as opposed to 10,000 when compared to the needle valve.

    This change was made because the needle valve was very difficult to work with.

    COMPLETED VESSEL

    Figures 6 and 7 show the completed pressure vessel before the Geopolymer was added to

    the last layer. Figure 8 shows the pressure vessel painted with the Geopolymer resin.

    Figure 6

    Figure 7

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    24/28

    24

    Figure 8

    TESTING

    The testing was done to 100 psi with air using an air compressor. The pressure vessel

    was put under a wheel barrow, which was weighed down with cinder blocks. The

    pressure vessel was tested at a distance of 25 feet from the compressor. Figures 9 and 10

    show the compressor and testing setup.

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    25/28

    25

    Figure 9

    Figure 10

    The pressure vessel was examined for leaking at 20 psi. Minor leaking did occur but it

    did not effect the performance at the pressures tested. The pressure was then increased to

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    26/28

    26

    70 psi, followed by 100 psi. The pressure was held and no failures occurred aside from

    the slight leak somewhere on the cylindrical body. These results show that it is very

    difficult to hand construct a cylindrical pressure vessel with spherical end caps using

    carbon fiber cloth. Although all layers overlapped there was still a leak possibly due to

    misalignment of strips or not enough epoxy. The geo-polymer did not stick well to the

    Original Design Goal

    Our original design goal was to create a pressure vessel comprised of carbon fiber/ epoxy

    matrix material. We were to use the fibers oriented at 0 and 90 degrees for a total of six

    layers. Our end result was constructed completely of carbon fiber epoxy. Our design was

    the first design to include carbon fiber epoxy end caps. Previous groups used PVC piping

    end caps, attaching them with epoxy. These groups found that failure always occurred

    where the caps were attached, forcing us to find a better and stronger design. The design

    we used was to have spherical end caps made from carbon fiber strips oriented offset

    from each other. This after testing was found to be very strong, causing no failure at the

    ends, solving the design failures of the other groups. However with this problem solved,

    another one arose in our testing. While testing a leak occurred somewhere along the

    cylindrical body, showing that our design may have been good, however our construction

    may have had a flaw. Since this vessel was built by hand, there is going to be some sort

    of human error associated, especially this being our first manufacturing process.

    However, with this mind we still completed our original design goal and improved on last

    years.

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    27/28

  • 8/14/2019 Rutgers Final Composite Tank Proposal.pdf

    28/28

    Geopolymer resin to increase its strain capacity in order to be considered suitable in

    pressure vessels.


Recommended