May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
1
Rutgers University Survey of Consumers with Developmental Disabilities Enrolled in Medicaid
Managed Care
Presentation to the15th Annual Conference on
Medical Care for People with Developmental
Disabilities
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
2
Acknowledgements
• This project was funded by the New Jersey Council on Developmental Disabilities
• We received assistance from the New Jersey Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) and the New Jersey Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services (Medicaid)
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
3
Project Team
• Dorothy Gaboda• Thomas Trail• Igda Martinez• Susan Brownlee
Center for State Health Policy at Rutgers(CSHP)
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
4
Background
• Many Medicaid beneficiaries have been in managed care in New Jersey and other states since the early 1990’s
• New Jersey Care 2000+ was implemented to provide managed care for SSI Aged, Blind and Disabled beneficiaries in October 2000
• Managed care has the potential to provide more coordinated care and enhance the quality, continuity, and appropriateness of care received
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
5
Planning for New Jersey Care 2000+
• Extensive planning process which involved advocates, representatives of health plans, experts, and experiences in other states
• Managed care contract provides many protections for individuals with special needs
• Health plans are required to provide care management and a network of providers with expertise in dealing with individuals with special needs
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
6
Implementation of New Jersey Care 2000+
• Original plan was to phase in new beneficiaries in four tiers by county
• Initial period of voluntary enrollment, followed by automatic assignment to an HMO
• Extensive outreach and education provided by Health Benefits Coordinators
• Automatic assignment only implemented in Camden County
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
7
Purpose of the Study
• Examine how well the enrollment process into Medicaid managed care is working for people with developmental disabilities
• Look in-depth at problems people are having to help improve the process
• Learn about problem solving strategies
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
8
Methods
• Mail survey of 325 people who enrolled between October 2000 and September 2002
• Survey was conducted November 2002-January 2003
• Follow-up personal interviews with 37 individuals
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
9
What did we ask about?
• Enrollment materials• Assistance from
Health Benefits Coordinators (HBCs)
• Information from HMOs
• Primary Care doctors and specialists
• Prescription drugs• Care managers• Complex needs
assessments• Special services• Referrals outside
HMO network
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
10
Who responded to the Survey?
• Very similar to other individuals served by DDD in age and gender (44% female)
• From all counties in New Jersey• 17% Hispanic, 18% Black/African American• Most surveys completed by proxy for the
consumer, usually parent or guardian• More living with families than in group
homes
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
11
HMO Reported by Respondents
Horizon Mercy35%
AmeriChoice26%
Amerigroup16%
Health Net10%
University9%
No response4%
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
12
HMO Enrollment• Nearly two-thirds (61%) of respondents said they
chose their own HMO.• 41% of those who picked their own plan chose
Horizon Mercy; 20% chose Amerigroup; 18% chose AmeriChoice.
• 13% picked Aetna originally; 62% of these changed to AmeriChoice.
• 14% indicated they were automatically assigned, but many of these made a choice after advice and assistance from a medical professional or a Health Benefits Coordinator.
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
13
Findings about the Enrollment Process
• Outreach worked:– 80% received a kit and/or attended an enrollment
event• 82% said enrollment kit was easy to understand• 62% said it was easy to know where to get help• No differences by race or ethnicity• Those who had difficulty had problems finding
out which networks their doctors belonged to
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
14
Selecting an HMO• 63% found it easy to select an HMO—very few
automatically assigned• People received help mostly from family and
guardians; some from their doctor, nurse, or social worker
• Most people (69%) picked HMO because they could keep their doctors
• 18% hoped to receive new services• Those who had difficulty selecting found process
and paperwork confusing or had competing family priorities
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
15
Experience with Health Benefits Coordinators
• Nearly half of respondents got information or assistance from a Health Benefits Coordinator
• Over half reached an HBC after one or two calls; 70% had no difficulties
• 65% had questions about which network doctors or hospitals were in
• 83% were satisfied with response from HBC
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
16
Experience with Doctors
• 70% kept previous doctor as Primary Care Provider; similar in all health plans
• Most people kept all or some previous specialists
• Nearly half were referred to new medical/dental specialists
• 85% said they could see their doctor as often as they wanted– About 10% who chose a new PCP had problems
seeing doctor
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
17
Satisfaction with Doctors
• 95% were satisfied with Primary Care Provider• Only half had picked a dentist—85% of these
were satisfied– Inability to find a dentist was mentioned by 5% in
open-ended questions.• High satisfaction with travel time, time to get
appointments and service at offices• Those who were dissatisfied worried about
doctors dropping out of networks
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
18
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Services
• Fewer than 30% reported needing mental health/substance abuse services – About ¾ got services they wanted
• 20% needed crisis services– 50% got services
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
19
Care Managers
• Over half of respondents had a care manager
• Most got a care manager within one month• 84% were satisfied with their care
manager• Many said care manager was the best
thing about their HMO• Care managers helped get new services
and solve problems
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
20
Comments About Care Managers
• “Special needs coordinator extremely helpful”
• “The special care coordinator took care of finding and arranging for a pediatric dentist”
• “Special needs case manager—she goes the extra mile to help my son”
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
21
Awareness of Rights
41.5%
61.5%
74.5%
54.8%
56.3%
81.9%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Can enroll in HMO in any county
Can change to another HMO at any time
Can change PCP at any time
Can appeal if you cannot receive service
Can call Medicaid Managed Care hotline
Can call member services withquestions
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
22
Satisfaction with HMO
• Asked respondents to rate overall satisfaction with HMO on 4 point scale (very unsatisfied to very satisfied)
• 63.1% of respondents said they were either satisfied or very satisfied with their HMO
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
23
Rating of Overall Satisfaction with HMO (N=325)
18.5%
44.6%
11.4% 12.9% 12.6%
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
Verysatisfied
Satisfied Unsatisfied Veryunsatisfied
Don't Know
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
24
Percent Satisfied with HMO
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
Horizo
n Merc
y
Health
Net
Univers
ityAmeri
grou
pAmeri
Choice
Overal
l
• Horizon Mercy was significantly above average and AmeriChoice was significantly below average
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
25
Open-Ended Questions
• Asked for specific comments on HMOs to supplement ratings– “What is the best part of being in your
HMO?”• N = 210
– “What is the worst part of being in your HMO?”
• N = 224
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
26
The Best Part
• About half said:– Keeping the same primary care doctor– Keeping the same specialists– Having a care manager
• Other common responses were:– Having good doctors– Getting better service or coverage than had
previously
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
27
The Best Part: Examples• “The best part is I have a real good doctor.”• “We were able to continue medical care with our
previous provider.”• “No out-of-pocket expense. Most specialists we
see are members.”• “Care management with their monthly follow up.”• “Availability of services, i.e. speech, OT,
counseling. However, would like to see bio feed- back and other alternative health services offered.”
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
28
The Worst Part
• Over half said:– Number of doctors, specialists, and
hospitals who do not accept coverage or are not accepting new patients
• Other common responses:– Difficulty and inconvenience of getting
referrals– Difficulties getting name brand medications
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
29
The Worst Part: Examples
• “I call doctor after doctor; they have dropped out.”
• “Unable to find a dermatologist, surgeon or dentist in or near our area willing to accept it. At best they make you wait 3-4 months for an appt.”
• “All the red tape you have to go through to get service.”
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
30
Follow-up Interviews• Obtain more in-depth information about sources
of dissatisfaction and/or difficulties experienced• Selection criteria:
– Dissatisfied or experienced difficulties– Consumers, parents of young children, parents of
adult children, and community providers– Hispanic ethnicity
• 37 people were interviewed– 6 Hispanic, four interviews in Spanish– 7 Black/African American
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
31
Interview Subject Areas
• Enrollment/Selecting an HMO• HMO Process/Paperwork• Primary Care Physicians and Specialists• Care Managers • Problem Solving Strategies
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
32
Interview Findings:Enrollment/Selecting an HMO
• Many parents interviewed didn’t seem to have made an “informed” choice– Didn’t research physician networks or
services– Chose HMO they were told was “the best”
• Some felt forced to enroll in an HMO– Letters and phone contacts conveyed that
those who didn’t sign up voluntarily would be assigned an HMO
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
33
Interview Findings:HMO Process/Paperwork
• Inconvenience of managed care was a major theme– Referral process and travel time to network
physicians and facilities– Especially an issue for working parents
• Products and services covered– Knowledge of coverage– Denials of claims
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
34
Interview Findings:PCPs and Specialists
• The possibility of having to switch physicians is an enormous concern– Established network of specialists– Concern about availability of quality
physicians with experience treating people with special needs
• Perception that physicians they want to use will not stay in HMO networks
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
35
Interview Findings:Care Managers
• Few had experience with care managers• Those who did found care managers
helpful in getting referrals and services• Difficulty getting a care manager• Turnover among care managers was a
problem
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
36
Interview Findings:Problem Solving Strategies
• Call HMO or Health Benefits Coordinator• Care managers helpful• Call ARC or other advocacy group• Several parents stopped using benefits
– Cover child under parent’s plan– Pay out of pocket– Go without or delay care
• Staff from community providers seemed to navigate the system better than some parents
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
37
Summary• Outreach was successful and many got help
enrolling from HBCs• Up-to-date information on provider networks is
key to satisfaction with enrollment• Satisfaction with doctors and specialists is
high—some perception that doctors are leaving HMO networks
• Satisfaction with care managers is high, and they appear key to problem solving
• Some parents are isolated and uninformed and would benefit from case management and education
May 21, 2004 Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+www.cshp.rutgers.edu
38
To obtain a copy of the full report
• Report:Transitions into New Jersey Care 2000+:
Experiences of Consumers with Developmental Disabilities and their Families
• Available on-line at www.cshp.rutgers.edu or www.njddc.org
• Call 609-984-4513 or fax 609-292-7114, ATTN: Pat Krupka