2.379 NORWAY LAKE
I'NIVfrX
rwmotm BAT, APRU u , 1971
010
KEFORT OH
HAG KM'IC Ali D tLBCTROMACKRTIC
or
LUMHT LAKE
AKH ftLVtiOPWKMT CORPORAT1OK
M Ik IN G DIVISION, OKfARIO
NTS 51-0-13
K* M*
OJA UNIffi
EXPLORATION
c AH d
or
3UM.V&Y&
LUMBY
or
Mi i; VE* bXiaQKA'UOli AITtt HBYfitOfMJSHV C^RPOMATXOK
^JMKG , OM'AKID
S I*O-13
SUMMART
AJB it follow-ujj to ft
in tho j^priw© of J9?0, B ftp* ei l c tind
of thu
woi k wo ixtrfot*atod on the tuoby Lake portion
febrmtry 1071* fhi* work
of previous *urv*y AU well **
a
c l a i fra fei ali e c' tul)8K u.utmt to the
eu! concurrent with antf subfte^u&nt t©
*ne? Ittc"l.t;a.t4ul that tho majority ©f th*
tuf'f**t'ou* t'gW'ber* tt f the voletntt' series of the #r®iu 1fh#
*) ot!.,?U'Ua ^Jt-ae ii^idtt^ ar^ due to miftotr
. *iri''* l fs {imer*! i^a^n^tic rtli^f it*, th* urus i*
.c. f fxi^) cttldHf.tmjii til^eironagniitic.'
in JUfcht of iaiowlt'df* n*lpod to dot**,
further invtuntigisition by ciiiUMMttf drilling*
ol' tJilit^ ^utijiiittmito^ tsitittii! c:lfct,ta.fc
k 240320, lv ^403?3, l 2t6VVl, K 28(.y9^, i;
aud K 267971.
LOC At IOK
ifjt* i!niv4jx proiHtffcy in J.ae#tt?i'! ut LtMtby tuke ir*
the i):6Aora Mining tivl^ioii, in the District of Kenor*,
laS ^ilt?^ HW w t of 1'hiuidur- Bny end BStrf AtAJ:okin* iii&if kay map)*
LAKE SUPERIOR
UNIVEX EXPLORATION a DEVELOPMENTCORP LTD.
Locotion and Claim MapsLUMBY LAKE
MAFtCH,l97l OJA LTD.
Gt,KtRAL GEOLOGY
geology of thin area ham previously
reported to the company by R. V. Ojlfe, Ph. D., F. Bng. The
publishod. report of Woolverton (O.D.Hi report t vol* 69, part
"Geology of the Iumby take Area* ) also describes the
geology in soflMs detail i The property i* under In in by the
usual asuonbJa^e of volcenic rock* of which ma&ttivo untievite
i* the predoninant Borabor. Minor basic Intruaivea* terated
quart* porphyry by Woolverton, aro known to exiat in the
area. The faults of the area tend to strike in a general
northerly direction, extensive copper nineraliaation, in the
form of eh a l copy r i to, appear* to be confined to a tuffaceous
layer in the volcanic series.
THE liLLCTKOM ACETIC SURVEY
fen I van le oldclroaiftgiuetic toohnique utilises
olterttating current of frequency 1000 Ha which is fed into
the ground by 6 frysUtio coimprixei} of a gasoline generator,
insulated copper wirtt and sheet net a l electrodes ypa,feedx
usually two plies apfirt* Heasuresient of the horisonta^
component of the resulting electroeagnetic field allows the
tapping of the subsurface distribution of the current and
hence contrasts in conductivity of the subsurface Materials*
The fiolc* M*4tBur*fl6ntfi *ru iimi* with tha B.inrnniion JEE3
unit (ftKKiol K)*V-C11S9 cojap®Bk*ntt0r uft i t *nd BMl*m~
unit), lach unit of m^aitureiiont 1ft fequlvsluit to
field utronfth and tho acfelo ct.rtti.lt t vi ty i at
five fiol*i unix,i*. Meaeuroomnt* wore Wttde at int©rv*l*i of
100 foot (SO fuel in Rowe aisenanlouri AP***) #t lifts*
40 Q .fegt ....jBpoK . 1 1* the* nr**a of Known copper
of 2QQ feot watt uoori, /.pprisjsitiiiitfuiy SOP
ooeupiod for A totftl of AlLtAi
This survey wu* pcurfomcKEl with two
con figuration R whieh **re illutt rated on the *Bcloi**d Hf
profile map. Axon of conductors locatod ara tfopictod by
heavy dashed line und aro labolod A f Rg C ftftfl S to Q
t.o corro*f*ortd with conductor* looatod by t h t*
survey*
In ifttiii'proting tho rc*nultA t oautioti
in cor re J at ing the magnitud** of the aste**li0ft
Mti4 the iiotttitl merits of the conductor* th*
*fiomiilie* r©pre*6iit, *inon conductor *i*o *nri locution with
ronpoct to the current oleotro^^a will gr*ntly *ffoot the
ettplitudo of an enownly. In short , it i* iirefcr^bie to
d an abnormti rct*poniM!i ** imch without placing utiOuo
on the K0gnitudo of thw nnoMaly* Yhi* feet i*
illy*trAt*a *6*ir*bly fcy imow*)y *i* which is likely du* to
onu tyfi* of conductor throughout it* t-ntit o length vhiU th*
peak *tiokrJy etejvMturU d f. o r ea SK* a* the- anonaiy intern!*
fi-ow the wo*tt cutiftnt olecttoiitt* In *roAtt Adequntel
fro* th^ 3tcitrof!oft, howtjv^r, the wugnitucte ef ill** fltioic*Jy
of th* si e o *nO wMMtuet&vitjr of
the above in wine', *n * x AH i nation of tbo
pJwct.rt*Wftynetic jroflln Mop reveal* nuwercmw *sl*ctro-
which tronoh p^riiil^] to tit* piedo*ln*nt
of th *ir**, Of
by two dimwit^ drill hole* IftbwleiJ t-1 *nU 1-7 both
of which recount ? r ftd *igBifie*iii.t
in a wiath of tuffaceous
In Edition, n.U other hole* ciriiled
ol*ctro**gn*tio imow.nl, i^n, e-Mjountpr ed
of wlUch pyjitir WWK th* Hftjor
of the gettoraliK^ results of th®
pertinent to tho geophysical datu is i*ro*entod iti
8 to S Inolusive and in table J.*
fe^p
fr*;
-^-.
''.A
J'''-
'- "''
-' j**'
"' '-''
'"'
^;-
.y' t,-,
-'r^
.-:- w
'
-T - ^
-H"-
;^';,
:; ^
--v
o z a -.o
-f •~ s CA
p l
O l O
p I 01
c o 3 Z m O*
z •*-
(A
o
0 l 5 f
r 51 l ro
i;^s,45^vf*o^^^CP^^^
.fe:^^m :;:,m^ ̂\^^'*:^'--/ '''•'
\o
,OO\ * (lM
^ y X s S
, OO \ t J
OOtl -l
'^^^^
MM K ti*or
JKTERSKCtXO*ROCK fYfK , or
U6
30*
ye*
41*
porphyry
Tuff
tuff
of toigh
pyrite, J It i t
fair to
in tuff
The f'oi*agoin;g iJiuftUfcte* the fitdt that Chone
conductor* tlrii/uc! to dal* h*v#t coiit*in*Ml ntttfid*
ovei *uCfic****ttly
of this **.m,-rall*a:t,tos* i i*
uwwt |y^t OUA i(tofcib*rft of tht*
rock ty^tse cvuU' bo Adding
widths to acvotmt for the
t-*p*'o*ant*
by tho *oft4r fti*d likely
mv* itom ne t!i*t
to the-
additiortttl *fiesiftl4,Q* for wUioh
infortnfttiot* hn* He on obtAiu^ to cJ*t*. tta thu
of tht* result es to d*\,o t it i* rttftiMtm*klv to eitpenirt
future Drilling nJlthougit the itntwro of
the win^rAliB&tiou to l* o oti^ouiiL^t ed is obv4ou*iy unknown*
Of th*j rwttioinliig at Ofcali^M, * L V nnd BK fe nr* ve i -y
And an *j*p*r*ftit disrupt i&w in t h* ir extent
to j* uliittit northerly trondimg topofirr^phio, lina*r
the ^OKitiibiJIity of n f AU 1 1 tr*n*ooting the property At tho
w t* ut *nd of J.viwby Credit*
f li E MAGK6Y1C
covering approxiMAt^ly the
*ut vey, nwre **adts by c-ocs*
* IHapjp0 i*: P*! vertical fore^
the courisa of thin survey.
Approximately 385 at a t ion a **tro occupied! during
roultn aro plottfrd 4" n1'of^ lfe for*
or* t h t* en c l oued wap with fi profile acute of l" ** 31000
f her **ftpmtic rolinf in g#nor*lly fist with * f**r
areal* indicfxt^i by hftich**0 lin®*. JDleaoitd drill hole L- 4
in l ittle Horrift Kakts irxterA&cte^ fine- g ruined di*ba*e And
of the t**Jor Muffitftic AnoK*H0*
thtt dlwlHis^ dik** are revpobatibltt for thftir origin*
AKO RBCOHNEM0Af XCMS
)r. tjonftj.fierstlftft of th* foregoing di*cuMftion t
conclunion* OKII foes drawn i
l, f ha nun^roua fjl^ctrawftjfiictic *no*felie* oncountt^redi
the tut by l fttc* portion of tho Univ*x |*rO}*nrty
with ^i^eeibifiatrd pyrite und
in tuffaeootis Inyere of volcmnic rock*
ii for the f wet t h ut many of the
lit in topogritphio Oen|*r#tisions oincr
ne i e mor^ Jtikctly to
2. Ko direct correlation ti^twamt th eneotintcfttti istner*li-
imd tl-e ^ftgn^tic ftnoftMilif}*
9
Anomaly C originates frott gignificant chalcopyrite
Kiueralifcotion. H in, therefor*, recommended that
additional diamond drilling bo p&rforaitfd to tout theae
{modality not previously drilled! a* wall UK other
portion* of anoasalio* K and 1C Which are quite extensive*
the extent of tho drilling ** well 40 th* dennity of
the holon should ho noverned fey geological and ecortottic
contoidei ationi* a* ^oophyaically, the Anoftaliea located
can only be considered of equal Merit* It is further
that the foanibility of geoohcwical noil
ho in vest i gut ed over anomaly C to deteraine
the applicability of the method in this situation.
Should geochenietry prove foasiblo* *elocte*d profile*
should ho AM) i led and copper detorwinations made over
the* iHftJor cleK'troBsoffnetic anonalioa* Such a
would bet inoxpetiftive and could poaaibly add to the
efficiency of further drilling.
Respectfully submitted,
r.K HAT, ONTARIO
AFKll 14, 1971
K. K. I'OULStN, B. Bo.
OJA L1M1TBD
LXFJORATIOK
PERFORMANCE Se
.ASSESSMENT WORK DETAILS
Township or Arra A/Of^iOftV L fi K.6
Type of Survey_______/^.
2.379 NORWAY LAKE
List numerically900
Chief Line Cutler or Contractor
A separate form is required for each type of survey
O T rXName
Address
Party Chief. . u.Name
i -7t A lBeerA ST. T, fi- * P"Address
Consultant. LTD .Name
1^3 M . Couter ST. TT /^. * P"Address
COVERING DATES
Line Hinting O e* SK, '2
FirM TAN. 3i R. /QInstrument work, geological mapping, sampling etc.
ffrtt. tS -^ mag./r / f -7 J
INSTRUMENT DATA
Make, Model and Type fS P ~
Scale Constant or Sensitivity tOr p rovide copy oj instrument data from Manufacturer's brochure,
Radiometric Background Count ——————
Number of Stations Within Claim Group ——————
Number of Readings Within Claim Group —3 0^5—
Number of Miles of Line cut Within Claim Group—/*
Number of Samples Collected Within Claim Group ^^—
CREDITS REQUESTED
Geological Survey
Geophysical Survey
Geochemical Survey
DATE ,Afy).33
20 DAYS 40 DAYS Includes per claim per claim (Line cutting)
D
SIGNED
Send in duplicate to:FRED W. MATTHEWS SUPERVISOR-PROJECTS SECTION DEPARTMENT OF MINES gc NORTHERN AFFAIRS WHITNEY BLOCK QUEEN'S PARK TORONTO, ONTARIO
Performance and coverage credits do not apply to airborne surveys
PERFORMANCE Se COVERAGE CREDITS
ASSESSMENT WORK DETAILS
Township or Arra h/O K U) A y L /? K G fatLGA
Type of Survey l?J- /SC TRO W A &N G-T' C~_____A separate form is required for each type of survey
Chief Line Cutter, or Contractor Name
Address
Party Chief K-Name
ST. r. s.Address
Consultant. L. TPName
Coufcr -^T-Address
COVERING DATES
Line Cutting *OCT.
Field
- 1 2 li 7 O
Dffirp
Instrument work, geological mapping, sampling etc.
. I S tf 7/ ̂ ^—-—-
INSTRUMENT DATAfcfllP- 62 1? ?Make, Model and Typr t C3y\Q i.tji^-'r LLM.T- —
Scale Constant or Sensitivity l U K) IT "^ 5" hi ft.*Or p rovide copy of instrument data jrom Manufacturer's brochure.
Radiometric Background Count
Number of Stations Within Claim Group
Number of Readings Within Claim Group
Number of Miles of Line cut Within Claim Group—Z.I——
Number of Samples Collected Within Claim Group ^———
CREDITS REQUESTED
Geological Survey
Geophysical Survey
Geochemical Survey
DATE Ci P r. 7*
20 DAYS 40 DAYS Includes per claim (Line cutting)
Show Check -l
SIGNED.7
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * * . . . . f^ * * Jr. * * *X* * " ' ' ' * ' ^i** * ' ' * ' * * * ' * ' * ' V-
•^H^^J- ccnKnjt C
ouxJVbi Ut J
APR '* ^ 'i S
StCi.UN
TOTAL
w
Send in duplicate to:FRED W. MATTHEWS SUPERVISOR-PROJECTS SECTION DEPARTMENT OF MINES Bc NORTHERN AFFAIRS WHITNEY BLOCK QUEEN'S PARK TORONTO, ONTARIO
Performance and coverage credits do not apply to airborne survey!
SUBMISSION OF GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS
AS ASSESSMENT WORK
In order to simplify the filing of geological, geochemical and ground geophysical surveys for assessment work, the Minister has approved the following procedure under Section 84 (8a) of the Ontario Mining Act. This special provision does not apply to airborne geophysical surveys.
If, in the opinion of the Minister, a ground geophysical survey meets the requirements prescribed for such a survey, including:
(a) substantial and systematic coverage of each claim(b) line spacing not exceeding 400 foot intervals(c) stations not exceeding 100 foot intervals or(d) the average number of readings per claim not less than 40 readings
it will qualify for a credit of 40 assessment work days for each claim so covered. It will not be necessary for the applicant to furnish any data or breakdown concerning the persons employed in the survey except for the names and addresses of those in charge of the various phases (linecutting contractor, etc.). It will be assumed that the required number of man days were spent in producing the survey to qualify for the specified credit.
Each additional ground geophysical survey using the same grid system and otherwise meeting these requirements will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days.
A geological survey using the same grid system, and meeting the requirements for submission of geological surveys for maximum credits will qualify for an assessment work credit of 20 days. If line cutting has not previously been reported with any other survey and is reported in conjunction with the geological survey a credit of 40 days per claim will be allowed for the survey.
Similarly, a geochemical survey using the same grid system with the average number of collected samples per claim being not less than 40 samples, and meeting the requirements for the submission of geochemical surveys for maximum credits, will qualify for an assessment .work credit of 20 days. If line cutting has not previously been reported with any other survey and is reported in conjunction with the geochemical survey a credit of 40 days per claim will be allowed for the survey.
Credits for partial coverage or for surveys not meeting requirements for full credit will bc granted on a pro-rata basis.
If the credits are reduced for any reason, a fifteen day Notice of Intent will be issued. During this period, the applicant may apply to the Mining Commissioner for relief if his claims are jeopardized for lack of work or, if he wishes, may file with the Department, normal assessment work breakdowns listing the names of the employees and the dates of work. The survey would then be re-assessed to determine if higher credits may be allowed under the provisions of subsections 8 and 9 of section 84 of the Mining Act,
If new breakdowns are not submitted, the Performance and Coverage credits are confirmed to the Mining Recorder at the end of the fifteen days.
- t-
1 **}k" " - " .
•pis.* •^Kf-'.-m. t-.- v.' '-'i''
-A*
. i,r——*
^1
Gulliver Lake (M.2454)9I0 15'
49007'30
(D
O'^d
3O
cu
7 ' .r^ * rtA * l X i r ,- St*^"**^
2B699I .24032312403201 240319
- - S-poon - -
303908 i 302909 i30\Z9IO ^ 5^
41091 ' 44092 44DISTRICT22M.
n 490 07'30'
490 00
9I 0 3O(28'
523835*804* 2 .379 NORWAY LAKE 200
COro(M
O)
o
o(A
TJ
O
ir
490 OO'
27' 25' 24' 22 21 '20 19' 18 17' 16'
9I0 IS'
Sawbill Bay-Marmion Lake (M.2362)
AREA .OF
NORWAY LAKE
DISTRICT OFKENORA - RAINY RIVER
KEN OR A MINING DIVISION
p^
SCALE: 1-INCH-4O CHAINS
LEGENb
PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING* HIGHWAYS ^RAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEG
MINES J . ~
NOTES
400' Surface Rights Reservation around all lakes and r ivers.
OF ISSUE
NOV l * 1971
, OEPT. OF MINES AFFAIRS
NATIONAL TOKMJRAPHK: SEWIS 52 G 3
PLAN NO. M-2385ONTARIO
DEPARTMENT OF MINES- i AND NORTHERN
'.S
J"
C t
\
? " ^
•^"^ * -'^ . i, -.
. ir •t*
•f-S.
••
't
-,- .j*-* ^:^-~- ". -^ sj:, ^5 . v.. 1 "-- ' -, ^ 9?
rfi^iHm——.iv-^-.p n^i.irii*a. M*-
LIT
TL
E
MO
RR
IS
LA
K
LEG
EN
D
MA
GN
ETO
ME
TER
P
RO
FILE
(V
ert
ical
scal
e l
- I.
OO
O g
am
mas)
MA
GN
ETI
C
AN
OM
ALO
US
A
RE
A
CLA
IM
LIN
E
UN
IVE
X E
XP
LO
RA
llON
Q
DE
VE
LO
PM
EN
T
CO
RP
OR
AT
ION
LIM
ITE
D
MA
GN
ETO
ME
TER
SU
RVE
Y
PRO
FILE
M
AP
LUM
BY
LAK
E
O J
A
LTD
MAR
CH
10
,197
1
WIR
E
LIN
E
K 24
032
3
360
K 2
86
99
2
K 2
40
32
0
LU
M8Y
LA
KE
BUFO
LA
KE
LIT
TLE
M
ORR
IS
LAKE
ELE
CTR
OD
E
A
K2
86
095
K 286006
ELEC
TRO
DE
B
MA
GN
ETI
C
to
o •0
jO 30
50
70
(
'
0 0 0 0
'x,
""x
.75
"\^
190
I/O ^ '
i, o
/
.i2o
133
i
. IS
O
..00
,^oo^^
——
—
l So
ifio
19O
t 19
0
I/O
13
0
IfeO
i ^rt
* 1
02
bO
. 170
S2G03SW8040 2-379 NORWAY LAKE
E20
UN
IVEX
EXP
LOR
ATIO
N a
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T C
OR
POR
ATIO
N L
TD.
DETA
ILED
GAL
VANI
C EL
ECTR
OM
AGNE
TIC
SUR
VEY
CONT
OUR
MAP
LUM
BY L
AK
E P
RO
PER
TY
.
200
40
0'
60
0'
800
MAR
CI-i
2,19
71
ELEC
TRO
DE
"AV
ER
TIC
AL
SC
AL
E
l"*
20
0 U
NIT
S
CO
ND
UC
TOR
A
XIS
FIE
LD
RE
AD
ING
CLA
IM B
OU
ND
AR
Y
TRE
NC
HE
LEC
TRO
DE
" B
11V
ER
TIC
AL
SC
ALE
l11
* 5
00
UN
ITS
UN
/VEX
EXP
LOR
ATIO
N Q
D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
CO
RPO
RAT
ION
LTD
.
DET
AILE
D G
ALVA
NIC
ELEC
TRO
MAG
NET
IC S
UR
VEY
^ -
3?
PRO
FILE
MAP
LUM
BY
LA
KE
PR
OPE
RTY
OJA
LTD
.M
ARC
H 2
,197
1
52G83SWB04e 2.379 NORWAY LAKE
230