S. Chaty S. Chaty (University Paris 7 / CEA Saclay)
Moriond Very High Energy Moriond Very High Energy PhenomenaPhenomena
La Thuile, 14 March 2005La Thuile, 14 March 2005
Microquasars and jets
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 22
SummarySummary
0. Prelude to microquasars0. Prelude to microquasars I. Youth of microquasarsI. Youth of microquasars II. Maturity of microquasarsII. Maturity of microquasars III. Microquasar land…III. Microquasar land…
Accretion/ejection, jets and surroundings…Accretion/ejection, jets and surroundings…
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 33
0. Prelude to microquasars: SS 4330. Prelude to microquasars: SS 433
1979: 1979: Microquasar prototypeMicroquasar prototype: SS : SS 433, or how a galactic object ejects 433, or how a galactic object ejects matter at 0.26c (matter at 0.26c (=1.04 =1.04 Margon 1984)Margon 1984)
Observations of emission lines in Observations of emission lines in optical: content of jets is baryonicoptical: content of jets is baryonic
Properties too special to be Properties too special to be classified in a familyclassified in a family
SS433 & W50: 2°x2° (Dubner et al., 1998)SS433 & W50: 2°x2° (Dubner et al., 1998)
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 44
1990: SIGMA, orbiting on 1990: SIGMA, orbiting on Granat, observes galactic Granat, observes galactic black hole candidatesblack hole candidates
1992: 1992: First microquasarFirst microquasar: : 1E 1740.7-2942: bipolar 1E 1740.7-2942: bipolar radio jets spread over radio jets spread over several light-years several light-years (jets/ISM interaction)(jets/ISM interaction)
Analogy with quasarsAnalogy with quasars The great annihilator of the The great annihilator of the
GalaxyGalaxy
I. Youth of microquasars: 1E 1740.7-2942I. Youth of microquasars: 1E 1740.7-2942
1E1740, 1’x1’: Mirabel et al. 1992
M87
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 55
Binary system of the Binary system of the Galaxy, black hole or Galaxy, black hole or neutron star, surrounded neutron star, surrounded by an accretion disc, by an accretion disc, and a companion starand a companion star
Necessity of multi-Necessity of multi-wavelength observations wavelength observations to understand various to understand various components, at different components, at different scales of the systemscales of the system
Now ~20 microquasars Now ~20 microquasars in our Galaxyin our Galaxy
I. Youth of microquasars: the scenarioI. Youth of microquasars: the scenario
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 66
1992: Discovery of the black hole 1992: Discovery of the black hole candidate GRS 1915+105, candidate GRS 1915+105, archetype of microquasarsarchetype of microquasars
1994: Observations of 1994: Observations of superluminal motion at v~0.92csuperluminal motion at v~0.92c
Advantages compared to quasars: Advantages compared to quasars: CloserCloser Observation of both jets: Observation of both jets:
approaching and recedingapproaching and receding Ejection timescale much shorterEjection timescale much shorter
Physical analogy: microquasars Physical analogy: microquasars really become “micro”-quasarsreally become “micro”-quasars
Now only microblazars miss to the Now only microblazars miss to the family…family…
I. Youth of microquasars: GRS 1915+105I. Youth of microquasars: GRS 1915+105
10 000AU=800mas Mirabel & Rodriguez 1994
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 77
Fruitful analogy Fruitful analogy quasars/ microquasarsquasars/ microquasars
Advantage Advantage microquasars: microquasars: accretion/ejection accretion/ejection timescale proportional timescale proportional to black hole massto black hole mass
Advantage quasars: Advantage quasars: Application of jet Application of jet models from active models from active galaxies to describe galaxies to describe ejection in microquasarsejection in microquasars
I. Youth of microquasars: analogy with I. Youth of microquasars: analogy with quasarsquasars
Chaty, PhD, 1998
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 88
I. Youth of microquasars: analogy with I. Youth of microquasars: analogy with quasarsquasars
Marscher et al. 2002
(3C120 observed during 3 years)GRS 1915+105 observed during 1 month
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 99
1997: First observations 1997: First observations of link between accretion-of link between accretion-ejection in GRS ejection in GRS 1915+1051915+105
Disappearance of internal Disappearance of internal part of accretion disc, part of accretion disc, followed by ejection of followed by ejection of relativistic plasma cloudsrelativistic plasma clouds
Recurrent ~30-45mn Recurrent ~30-45mn cyclescycles
I. Youth of I. Youth of microquasars: GRS microquasars: GRS
1915+1051915+105
Chaty, PhD, 1998Mirabel, Dhawan, Chaty et al. 1998
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1010
Standard model: Standard model: thermal emission of thermal emission of multicolour accretion multicolour accretion disc + non-thermal disc + non-thermal emission of plasma emission of plasma coronacorona
Low/hard and Low/hard and high/soft stateshigh/soft states
Concurrent models: Concurrent models: jet synchrotron jet synchrotron emission from radio emission from radio to Xto X
I. Youth of microquasars: accretionI. Youth of microquasars: accretion
Fender 2001
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1111
II. Maturity of microquasars:II. Maturity of microquasars: spectral energy spectral energy distributiondistribution
XTEJ1118+48XTEJ1118+4800
accretion accretion disc + non-disc + non-thermal thermal emission + emission + stellar stellar emissionemission
Non-linear Non-linear Monte-Carlo Monte-Carlo
simulation with simulation with hot spherical hot spherical
plasma in the plasma in the centrecentre
Chaty et al. 2003
Chaty et al. 2003
Chaty et al. 2003Markoff et al. 2001
What is the jet contribution???(need sensitivity + temporal resolution)
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1212
II. Maturity of microquasars:II. Maturity of microquasars: spectral energy spectral energy distributiondistribution: comparison with GRS 1915+105: comparison with GRS 1915+105
Flat radio spectrum, Plateau (low-hard) stateFlat radio spectrum, Plateau (low-hard) state Jet emission -> NIRJet emission -> NIR XTE J1118+480 & GRS 1915+105 have an accretion/outflow XTE J1118+480 & GRS 1915+105 have an accretion/outflow
energy ratio falling into the regime of radio-quiet quasarsenergy ratio falling into the regime of radio-quiet quasars
Study of the largest multiwavelength campaign(Ueda, Yamaoka, Sanchez, Dhawan, Chaty et al., 2002, ApJ, 571, 918)
1st simultaneous observations with INTEGRAL Fuchs, Rodriguez, Mirabel, Chaty et al. 2003, A&A, 409, L35
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1313
III. Microquasar land: III. Microquasar land: Ks Polarimetry of Ks Polarimetry of
H1743-322H1743-322 H1743-322 observed in H1743-322 observed in
outburst in 2003 and 2004outburst in 2003 and 2004
Average interstellar Average interstellar polarisation p=1.4-3.5%.polarisation p=1.4-3.5%.
Linear polarisation of Linear polarisation of H1743-322: p=2.25 +/- H1743-322: p=2.25 +/- 0.75%0.75%
Polarisation is interstellar Polarisation is interstellar consistent with a large consistent with a large extinction: Aextinction: AVV~ 11 ~ 11 line-of-sight close to the line-of-sight close to the
Galactic centreGalactic centre
During outbursts: During outbursts: propitious to detect propitious to detect polarisation from IR jet, polarisation from IR jet, but no sign of intrinsic but no sign of intrinsic polarisationpolarisation Dubus & Chaty, MNRAS
subm.
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1414
Mini-outburstMini-outburst
ESO/NTT 2003 ESO/NTT 2003 observations: Ks 3.2 observations: Ks 3.2 mag brighter than mag brighter than 2MASS (K2MASS (KSS~ 15.6 in ~ 15.6 in quiescence)quiescence)
RXTE ASM light curve: RXTE ASM light curve: small amplitude small amplitude outburst with 4.5 outburst with 4.5 counts/s peak lasting counts/s peak lasting about a month about a month ((Sturner & Shrader 2005). ).
Our observations on Our observations on the decline at ~2.5 the decline at ~2.5 counts/s. counts/s.
III. Microquasar land:III. Microquasar land: Polarimetry of XTE J1550-Polarimetry of XTE J1550-
564564
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1515
Ks polarimetry of XTE Ks polarimetry of XTE J1550-564 & field stars J1550-564 & field stars (ESO/NTT 2003 during (ESO/NTT 2003 during weak outburst). Stars weak outburst). Stars cluster around the origin, cluster around the origin, dispersion of 0.5%.dispersion of 0.5%.
Position of XTE J1550-564 Position of XTE J1550-564 inconsistent with other inconsistent with other stars at the 2.5stars at the 2.5 level=> level=> Intrinsic infrared Intrinsic infrared polarization p=0.9-2.0%.polarization p=0.9-2.0%.
Reddening E(B-V)=0.7=>Reddening E(B-V)=0.7=> expected interstellar expected interstellar
polarisation: ppolarisation: pKK~0.7%~0.7% Association with Association with
outburst?outburst? Dubus & Chaty, MNRAS subm.
III. Microquasar land:III. Microquasar land: Polarimetry of XTE Polarimetry of XTE
J1550-564J1550-564
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1616
Some microquasars emit at Some microquasars emit at high energy, emission high energy, emission dominated by power law dominated by power law (spectral index 2.5-3), no cut-(spectral index 2.5-3), no cut-off.off.
What is the underlying What is the underlying physical process: physical process: comptonization or comptonization or synchrotron?synchrotron?
Need polarization…Need polarization…
High-energy observations:High-energy observations: Constraints on accretion-Constraints on accretion-
ejection models: Blandford-ejection models: Blandford-Payne, Blandford-Znajek, Payne, Blandford-Znajek, MRI…MRI…
Jets made of eJets made of e--/e/e++ or e or e--/p?/p? Answer with detection of Answer with detection of
(Doppler) shifted or (Doppler) shifted or annihilation emission lines?annihilation emission lines?=> need sensitivity=> need sensitivity
III. Microquasar land: accretion-ejectionIII. Microquasar land: accretion-ejection
Grove et al. 1998
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1717
III. Microquasar land: accretion-ejectionIII. Microquasar land: accretion-ejection
Gallo, Fender, Pooley (2003)
Coupling:Frad FX
+0.71 kpc
Important to understand accretion/ejection coupling and model constraints
No strong Doppler amplification: low velocity jet (<0.8c, <2)
Coupling at higher energy???
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1818
Observation of a steady Observation of a steady compact jet in GRS compact jet in GRS 1915+105, 1mas=10AU 1915+105, 1mas=10AU (Dhawan et al. 2000)(Dhawan et al. 2000)
Observation of sporadic Observation of sporadic ejections at large scaleejections at large scale
III. Microquasar land: multi-scale observations of jetsIII. Microquasar land: multi-scale observations of jets
Fuchs, Rodriguez, Mirabel, Chaty et al. 2003
0.2’’/week
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 1919
Microquasar Microquasar community: jet = community: jet = propagation of plasma propagation of plasma cloudsclouds
Extragalactic Extragalactic community: jet = community: jet = propagation of shock propagation of shock wavewave
Application of 3C273 Application of 3C273 model to GRS model to GRS 1915+105: Propagation 1915+105: Propagation of shock wave forming of shock wave forming at 1AU, with dissipative at 1AU, with dissipative stream at v=0.6cstream at v=0.6c
III. Microquasar land: jetsIII. Microquasar land: jets
Turler, Courvoisier, Chaty, Fuchs, 2004
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 2020
1E 1740.7-2942: steady 1E 1740.7-2942: steady jet: braking of jet in jet: braking of jet in interstellar medium?interstellar medium? signature: narrow signature: narrow
annihilation lines at 511 annihilation lines at 511 keV? need better keV? need better sensitivity?sensitivity?
XTE J1550-564: Jets in X-XTE J1550-564: Jets in X-rays => Acceleration of rays => Acceleration of particles up to TeV: particles up to TeV: analogy with quasarsanalogy with quasars
What is the e- maximal What is the e- maximal energy???energy???
III. Microquasar land: jet-interstellar medium III. Microquasar land: jet-interstellar medium interactioninteraction
Jets at large distance: 45’’ (Corbel et al. 2002)
1E1740.7-2942
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 2121
III. Microquasar land: Jet-interstellar III. Microquasar land: Jet-interstellar medium interaction: GRS 1915+105’s medium interaction: GRS 1915+105’s
outburstoutburst
Mirabel, Rodriguez, Chaty et al. 1996, ApJ, 472, L111Mirabel, Rodriguez, Chaty et al. 1996, ApJ, 472, L111
Strong & long X-ray outburst Strong & long X-ray outburst of GRS 1915+105 in 08/1995of GRS 1915+105 in 08/1995
Radio source resolved in 2 Radio source resolved in 2 jetsjets
Increase of NIR emission Increase of NIR emission between 2 and 5 days after between 2 and 5 days after the radio burstthe radio burst
Presence of extended cocoon Presence of extended cocoon of dust, heated by ejectionsof dust, heated by ejections
Cocoon created by previous Cocoon created by previous ejections, jets, ISM dust???ejections, jets, ISM dust???
Dust later confirmed by Dust later confirmed by CHANDRA and ISO CHANDRA and ISO observationsobservations
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 2222
III. Microquasar land: III. Microquasar land: What about the What about the
surroundings of GRS surroundings of GRS 1915+105???1915+105???
Low-resolution cm Low-resolution cm map: 2 sources aligned map: 2 sources aligned with central sourcewith central source
Strange non-thermal features in the south-east lobe
Synchrotron signature=> interactions between jets and ISM?
Chaty et al. 2001, A&A, 366, 1035
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 2323
Microblazar = Microquasar Microblazar = Microquasar whose jet points towards the whose jet points towards the observerobserver
V=0.98c: time/10, flux*1000, V=0.98c: time/10, flux*1000, increase of photon energyincrease of photon energy
BUT sources difficult to BUT sources difficult to observe since flares, although observe since flares, although strong, are shortstrong, are short
Jet Precession: intermittent Jet Precession: intermittent microblazarmicroblazar
V4641 Sgr: at distance of 6 V4641 Sgr: at distance of 6 kpc, jets exhibit apparent kpc, jets exhibit apparent velocity of v~10c: velocity of v~10c: microblazar?microblazar?
III. Microquasar land: observation of III. Microquasar land: observation of microblazars…microblazars…
V4641 SGR: 1 day flare, 1.6->12.2 Crab, 148.8mag, wind velocity 5000km/s
Chaty et al. 2003
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 2424
III. Microquasar land: observation of ULXs…III. Microquasar land: observation of ULXs…
ULXs: ultra-luminous sources ULXs: ultra-luminous sources observed near active galactic nuclei at high stellar formation observed near active galactic nuclei at high stellar formation
raterate
Beamed jets from microquasars?Beamed jets from microquasars? Or black holes of intermediate mass (~1000 MOr black holes of intermediate mass (~1000 Msolsol)?)?
Are there ULXs in our Galaxy?Are there ULXs in our Galaxy? 3 associations between galactic microquasars and gamma-3 associations between galactic microquasars and gamma-
ray sources: e.g. LS 5039…ray sources: e.g. LS 5039… ……and hundreds of unidentified gamma-ray sources exist…and hundreds of unidentified gamma-ray sources exist…
Need better angular resolution for ULXs Need better angular resolution for ULXs
S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005S. Chaty - Moriond - 14 March 2005 2525
With better sensitivity:With better sensitivity: Low/hard emission related to presence of jet?Low/hard emission related to presence of jet? Annihilation line emitted by microquasars, from jet or from Annihilation line emitted by microquasars, from jet or from
e+ colliding the interstellar medium?e+ colliding the interstellar medium? What is the nature of the jet?What is the nature of the jet?
With better angular resolution:With better angular resolution: Distinguish sources, in particular ULXsDistinguish sources, in particular ULXs
With temporal resolution:With temporal resolution: Correlation between high-energy and radio (jet) emissionCorrelation between high-energy and radio (jet) emission
With polarization:With polarization: Infrared & high-energy synchrotron emission: Infrared & high-energy synchrotron emission:
synchrotron???synchrotron??? Link Theory/model/observations:Link Theory/model/observations:
Propagation of jetPropagation of jet Accretion-ejection mechanismsAccretion-ejection mechanisms Quasi-periodic oscillationsQuasi-periodic oscillations
IV. The key questionsIV. The key questions