Date post: | 26-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | michelle-mcmillan |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 2 times |
SAFEFOODERASAFEFOODERA
Stakeholder Group meeting with industryCopenhagen, 14 - 15 December 2006
Objectives of the meeting
20200808 “A European platform“A European platformfor protecting consumers for protecting consumers against food health risks”against food health risks”
The Staircase to The Staircase to the Futurethe Future
Information ExchangeInformation Exchange External External communicationcommunication
Strategic ActivitiesStrategic Activities
Joint ActivitiesJoint Activities
Transnational Transnational ActivitiesActivities
External External communicationcommunication
External External communicationcommunication
External External communicationcommunication
20042004 ERA-NET ERA-NETSAFEFOODERASAFEFOODERA
Information exchange and regions
Questionnaires
Food safety projects/activitiesManagement activities
Emerging risks
All SAFEFOODERA countries (n = 2303)
17 %
20 %
12 %
26 %
1 %
24 %
Nordic countries (n = 442)
19 %
0 %21 %
12 %
18 %
30 %
Central Europe (n = 1291)
10 %
1 %
13 %
27 %29 %
20 %
Mediterranean countries &Portugal (n = 567)
13 %
35 %0 % 11 %
10 %
31 %
New EU countries (n = 313)0 %
14 %
18 %
33 %
29 %
6 %
Emerging risks
Risk analysis
Contaminants
Traceability
Pathogens
Other topics
Provisional topics
All SAFEFOODERA countries (n = 261)
57 %17 %
4 % 22 %
Nordic countries (n = 68)
28 %
4 %
41 %
27 %
Central Europe (n = 162)
63 %
4 %
11 %
22 %
Data management
Consumerinformation
Analytical tools
Mathematicalmodelling
Others
Mediterranean countries & Portugal (n = 55)
29 %
0 %
25 %
46 %
New EU countries (n = 19)
11 %11 %
52 %
26 %
Emerging risks
To improve the process of launching future SAFEFOODERA calls
1. Discuss the roadmap (RM) used by SAFEFOODERA to select topics for the first pilot calls.
2. What are your suggestions for an improved roadmap for future calls?
The 1st objective of the meeting
The provisional strategic topicsThe provisional strategic topics were selected by were selected by Funders and decribed by Scientists
1. Emerging risks1. Emerging risks - A potential food or feed borne or diet-related hazard that may become a risk for human health in the (near) future.
2. Risk analysis in food safety2. Risk analysis in food safety - Methodologies in protecting the consumers against health risks and misleading information, including crisis management, consumer perception and risk/benefit analysis.
3. Contaminants3. Contaminants - Health risks from natural- and environmental contaminants in the food chain. 3.1 Process induced risk3.1 Process induced risk - Health risks from chemical pollution formed during processing of foods.
4. Traceability 4. Traceability - Documented and harmonised routines for recall of food products from the value chain - Development of reliable traceability methods and systems.
5. Pathogens5. Pathogens - Pathogen free production systems - From reactive to preventive and predictive actions.
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
Funders and Scientists
Funders
Funders
Funders
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
Evaluation criteria used by Funders : Step 1 to Step 3 - going from 70 to 12 topics
1) Relevance of society 2) Interest of stakeholders 3) Real or potential food safety problem 4) Need for SAFEFOODERA coordination 5) Community interest
SAFEFOODERA WG Topics - Scored Gross list
Criteria 1 Criteria 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5
Topics /Subtopics
Strategic Topic
subtopic nº SUM
Emerging Risk 2 23 24 22 28 26 123Pathogens 66 Decontamination (WS1) 25 25 21 25 23 119
Pathogens 56 Campylobacter (Q) 24 25 24 21 24 118
Pathogens 60 Pathogen free production systems (Q) 24 26 22 23 23 118
Pathogens 57 Salmonella (Q) 22 25 25 20 25 117
Data management (Q) = procedure to use/exchange all the available data & information (WS1)
Community interest
Relevance for society
Interest of stakeholders
Real or potential
food safety problem
Need for SAFEFOODERA coordination
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
Shortlist A containing priority themes with high project or
activity frequency
Shortlist B containing priority themes with low project or activity
frequencyAnalytical tools (1033) Pathogen free production chains
(42)
Standardisation (500) Fraud reduction (77)
Data management & exchange (300)
Foodborne viruses (23)
Zoonosis (221) Emerging risks (50)
Persistent organic pollutants (200) Risk assessment (102)
Food allergens (87)
Mycotoxins (127)
Topics selection by Funders: Step 1 to Step 3 - going from 70 to 12 topics
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
The 12 topics of the short list were further described in shortdocuments by Funders in cooperation with Scientists under
the following common headings:
1) Identification of problems 2) Formulation of the knowledge question 3) Strategic interest as a Pan-European project 4) Approach proposed to the problems
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
Funders
Scientists
Funders
Funders
FundersFunders
Funders / Scientists
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
Evaluation criteria used by Funders: Step 3 to Step 4 - going from 12 to 3 topics
1) National/ Regional relevance 2) Risk reduction at European level3) Risk reduction at National/ Regional level 4) Cost/benefit ratio5) Knowledge management / Research capacity
Criteria 1 Criteria 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5
Subtopics
ShortList SUM
Emerging Risk B 76 79 67 63 77 362
Zoonosis A 79 70 68 72 72 361
Pathogen free production systems (Q) B 75 70 60 70 63 338
POPs A 69 71 63 66 64 333
Food allergens B 66 68 61 66 68 329
Risk Assessment B 68 66 56 62 72 324
Micotoxins B 68 67 59 61 59 314
Analytical Tools (Q) A 66 60 52 68 65 311
Data management and Exchange A 63 60 57 64 63 307
Knowledge management/
Research capacity
National /Regionalrelevance
Risk reductionEuropean
level
Risk reduction
National/Regional level
Cost/benefitratio
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
Priority themeShort-list
Sum of scores (the lower score the better)
Countries with possibilities to participate
in writing call text
Zoonosis A 52 18
Emerging Risk B 59 16
Pathogen free production systems
B 62 12
Food allergens B 78 13
Persistent organic pollutants
A 79 13
Risk Assessment B 90 11
Groups composed of Scientists from countries with possibilities to participate in writing the call text further
developed the selected topics.
One group for each topic
Finally, the Funders accepted the call text before the call was officially launched
Roadmap for selection of topics for pilot calls.
The first joint pilot call was launched on
1 October 2006
To coordinate food safety aspects of ongoing national/regional programmes
Emerging risksPat. free production
Zoonosis
Country
Bask-country x x
Cyprus x x
Denmark x x x
Germany x x
Finland x x x
Netherlands x x
Norway x x x
Portugal x x
Iceland x x x
Sweden x x x
UK x x
WS2: The 2nd objective of the meeting
What is the optimal Research Infrastructure in Emerging Risks from industry/funders point of view,
to improve food safety research and to deliver effective education and training.
Information exchange database*The virtual transnational food
safety programme of Europe> 2300 projects registered
topics known - content unknown
Strategic activitiesNeed for tailored information
Joint activitiesThe food safety conference”The food safety journal”
Transnational activitiesTransnational calls
The SAFEFOODERA platform - *Country expansion
Emerging risksPathogensChemical contaminats*Diet&health*National experts
Joint activitiesHarmonised
food safety training
*Optimal conditions for Research
*Optimal conditions for Training
EFSA
EU
Definition of Research Infrastructures
Research infrastructures are tools,“single-sited”, “distributed” or “virtual””, that provide essential services to the scientific community:
Communication networks, databases, biological archives, libraries, research vessels………
Research infrastructure play a key role in the creation of knowledge, in the diffusion of knowledge and its application and exploitation.
Research infrastructure could be an established link between stakeholders to facilitate pan-European dissemination and exploitation of food safety results.
Optimal use of research infrastructures of pan-European interest is one of the priorities of the Standing Committee for Agricultural Research (SCAR).
Research infrastructures must provide a range of unique support services forresearch that are critical to delivery:
unique data management
interpretation and handling capacities
‘knowledge management infrastructures’ (such as statistics, design technologies, epidemiology, risk assessment expertise, data archives, and ‘social science’ infrastructures)
unique support facilities (such as high-level containment and experimental/housing facilities and expert trained support personnel).
An infrastructure of pan-European interest may be defined as having one or several of the following characteristics:
it is required for research of high added value at the European level
it is expensive in terms of investment and/or running costs
it is required in the long term
it is required at the European level, but not justified at a national one
it is required by several fields of research
it is required for an efficient use of common resources
Five research infrastructures seems presently to be insufficiently taken inaccount at a European level:
Long term experiments and observatories
Technological centres for process studies
Facilities to study animal diseases
Human nutrition research centres
Infrastructures that support research and deliver training
1. What are the main field of research infrastructures that are needed to improve food safety research, education and training?
2. What are the main existing research infrastructures facilities capable of improving the European capacity in food safety research, education and training?
3. What are the main obstacles to share research infrastructures in food safety research, education and training at the European level?
4. What are your suggestions for a better or optimal common use of these research infrastructures?
5. Will future food safety research, education and training have a demand for networking of distributed facilities, “virtual” centres and clusters of expertise, and therefore for management?
Consider the issue of research infrastructures of European added value in the context of future coordination of food safety research, education and training.
Future co-operation of Pan-European Networks in Food Sciences, Safety and Technology: Beyond SAFEFOODERA
Funders
(bureacrats)Scientists
Industry
Optimal conditions for Research and
Training
Network of national and EU
Funders
All EU MS and AMS +
Network of scientific research
institutes and universities
members in all EU MS and AMS +
CIAA
The Retail and Food
service sector
Consumers
Group A
Industry:
Marino PETRACCO ILLYHans Elbek PEDERSEN DANISCOWilly GEERAERTS BARRY-CALLEBAUTGeoff THOMPSON DANONE Gunna WÜRTZEN SRA Beate KETTLITZ CIAA (C)
Safefoodera:
Philippe Verger INRAMaria Landgren VINNOVAHartmut Waldner BVLHarmen Hofstra SAFECONSORTIUM (R)Oddur Gunnarsson NICEMads Peter Schreiber NICE
Group B
Industry:
Lisbeth MUNKSGAARD LMN (C)Herwig BERNAER BARRY-CALLEBAUTMiroslav KOBERNA Czech FederationSue O’HAGAN UNILEVERRoon VAN HOOIJDONK CAMPINARichard STADELER NESTLE
Safefoodera:
Alisdair Wotherspoon FSA (R) Boris Antunovic CROATIAN FOOD AGENCYMarcel Mengelers VWA Sabine Bonniek BVLOla Eide NICE