+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Safety Methodology Implementation in the Conceptual ... - IAEA

Safety Methodology Implementation in the Conceptual ... - IAEA

Date post: 06-Apr-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
23
8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety 1 of ? slides Safety Methodology Safety Methodology Implementation in the Conceptual Implementation in the Conceptual Design Phase of a Fusion Reactor Design Phase of a Fusion Reactor Lina Rodríguez-Rodrigo Joëlle Uzan-Elbez
Transcript

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety1

of ? slides

Safety Methodology Safety Methodology Implementation in the Conceptual Implementation in the Conceptual Design Phase of a Fusion ReactorDesign Phase of a Fusion Reactor

Lina Rodríguez-RodrigoJoëlle Uzan-Elbez

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety2

of ? slides

Safety Methodology Implementation in the Safety Methodology Implementation in the Conceptual Design Phase of a Fusion ReactorConceptual Design Phase of a Fusion Reactor

• For “an experimental reactor” could have beenthe question that the “fathers” of the ITER safetyapproach asked themselves.

• Answers are in a 1995 FED publication, NSSR and GSSR

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety3

of ? slides

Safety Methodology Implementation in the Safety Methodology Implementation in the Conceptual Design Phase of a Fusion ReactorConceptual Design Phase of a Fusion Reactor

• Why coming back to the same question for futurefusion reactor?– ITER will be a reference– Today environment:

• Non safety educated fusion community• Non fusion educated safety community

– Safety-fusion educated community should integrateimprove, organise safety in the design of future reactors

• introducing an appropiate quality assurance framework to be applied in the whole existing fusion community

• Provide scientific and technicat elements for informing thesociety?

• How? A conclusion for this meeting

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety4

of ? slides

Safety background in the Fusion CommunitySafety background in the Fusion CommunityFusion Machines

• JET 1991 1.7 MW fusion power1997 DTE1 16 MW fusion power

Safety case UK requirements and standards followedDismantling included in UKAEA

decommissoning

• TFTR 1993 + 3years DT campaign 11.5 MW Fusionpower

PSAR approved in 1978 USDOEFSAR approved in 1992 for DT operation

Dismantling and safe disposal 2002(in time and cost)

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety5

of ? slides

Safety background in the Fusion CommunitySafety background in the Fusion CommunityFusion Machines

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety6

of ? slides

Safety background in the Fusion CommunitySafety background in the Fusion Community

•Active Gas Handling System at JET •Tritium Laboratory Karlsruhe•Tritium Process Laboratory at Naka •Tritium Systems Test Assembly at Los Alamos (TSTA)•Tritium Laboratory at Valduc

Tritium laboratories

Inertial fusion

Methodology for IFE safety and environment assessment•HYLIFE-II•SOMBRERO

2005 INTERNATIONAL FUSION RESEARCH COUNCIL report7% of the article tackles safety for future fusion reactors

•Normal operation <1% of the naturally occurring dose rate•Most severe internal accident about annual natural radiation 1µSv•Waste

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety7

of ? slides

FissionFission background background forfor fusionfusion reactor conceptual reactor conceptual designdesign

Already implemented in previous mentioned installationsand in ITER

Slight differences• Definition of safety functions

•Control of the nuclear process in the reactor core

•Removal of heat from the core

•Confinement of the radioactive materials.

•Up to now limited potential of a fusion power increase

•Removal of the heat from the FW and VV activated material

•Confinement of the radioactive materials

fission fusion

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety8

of ? slides

Safety objectives

Risk

Source term

Energies

Safety functions

Confinement of radioactive products

Limitation of exposure for workers and environment

Residual power evacuation

Tritium

1st barrier

2nd barrier

Dynamic confinement

RadioprotectionWorker’s Doses evaluation

ALARAzoning

Safety objectives

MassActivityPhysical stateLocation

APDoses to the workers

EffluentReleases

ACP

Means for satisfying Safety functions

Passive means Maximum values

Safety objectives

Safety objectives

+ Illustration on the representative situations: operation, maintenance, incidents, design basis accidents

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety9

of ? slides

RISK RISK evaluationevaluation

Damage

Freq

uenc

y

0

1

RISK RISK evaluationevaluation

Curve of damage limit

Curve of characteristic risk

Safety margin

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety10

of ? slides

CompensatingCompensating meansmeans forfor riskrisk

• Principals of Damage mitigation– Protection by barriers– Defence in Depth– Lines of defence– Passive safety– Use of system…

Reduction of consequences to the Public, workers environement in normal, incidental en accidental situations

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety11

of ? slides

CompensatingCompensating meansmeans forfor riskrisk

• Reduction of the frequency of the damage– Redundancy– Diversity– Geographical separation– Unique failure criteria– Avoid common mode failure

Lowering probability of occurence ofevents

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety12

of ? slides

CompensatingCompensating meansmeans forfor riskrisk

• Ensure reliable, stable and easily manageable operation. • Prime goal the prevention of accidents.• Appropriate application of the Defence-In-Depth principle: several levels of

protection and multiple barriers to prevent releases of radioactive materialsto ensure that failures or combinations of failures that might lead to

significant radiological consequences are of very low probability.• Incorporated Technologies

proven orqualified by experience or testing or both

• The systematic consideration of the man–machine interface and human factors shall be included in all stages of design and in the associated development of operational requirements.

• The exposure to radiation of site personnel and releases of radioactive materials to the environment shall be made by design As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).

• A comprehensive safety assessment and independent verification shall be carried out to confirm that the design will fulfil the safety objectives and requirements before the operating organization completes its submission to the regulatory body.

DesignDesign PrincipalsPrincipals

IAEA Safety series nº 110

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety13

of ? slides

Scenarios•Transients•Accidents

Analysis of the eventsModels, codes, experiments,

(Damage, frequency)

DesignSystems

EquipmentsBuildings

...

OK?

Safety functionsSafety Objectives

ModificationNO

Prime goal the prevention of accidents

Implementation in the Design

YES

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety14

of ? slides

Scenarios•Transients•Accidents

Analysis of the eventsModels, codes, experiments,

(Damage, frequency)

DesignSystems

EquipmentsBuildings

...

OK?

Safety functionsSafety Objectives

Modification

Optimisation

Cost/Benefit

OK?

Implementation in the Design

NO

YES

YES

NO

Prime goal the prevention of accidents

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety15

of ? slides

Safety function confinement

•several levels of protection and multiple barriers

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety16

of ? slides

Safety function Decay heat removal

Approaches to safety, environment and regulatory approval for ITERFusion Engineering and Design 27 (1995) 83-95

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety17

of ? slides

Maintenance

Effective Doses calculationCollective doses

DesignSystems

RH-EquipmentsBuildingsSheldings

OK?

Safety functionsSafety Objectives

Modification

Optimisation

Cost/Benefit

OK?

Implementation in the Design

NO

YES

YES

NO

ORE and releases of radioactive materials to the environment by design As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).

ALARA

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety18

of ? slides

Normal operation

Ventilation-fire risk

DesignSystemsFlow-rateBuildings

OK?

Safety functionsSafety Objectives

Modification

Optimisation

Cost/Benefit

OK?

Implementation in the Design

NO

YES

YES

NO

ORE and releases of radioactive materials to the environment by design As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).

Reduction of releases

ALARA

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety19

of ? slides

ToolsTools forfor safetysafety in in thethe conceptual conceptual designdesign phasephase forfor futurefuture reactorsreactors

Classical methods would be complementedby probabilistic assessment using supportof forthcoming improved FMEA databasesand associated computer tools

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety20

of ? slides

Application to future power plantsApplication to future power plants

Reactor containement

Not only a fusion device•Nuclear buildings•Interfaces•Integration in the design

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety21

of ? slides

Auxilliary systemsControl system

Stack

Hot cells-Radwaste

Power supply

Reactor building

Ventilationdetritiation

System

Fuellingfacility

T

Fuellingfacility

Sch

em

ati

cS

chem

ati

co

f a f

usi

on

po

wer

pla

nt

of

a f

usi

on

po

wer

pla

nt

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety22

of ? slides

Auxilliary systemsControl system

Stack

Hot cells-Radwaste

Power supply

Reactor building

Ventilationdetritiation

System

Fuellingfacility

T

Fuellingfacility

Sch

em

ati

cS

chem

ati

co

f a f

usi

on

po

wer

pla

nt

of

a f

usi

on

po

wer

pla

nt

8th IAEA Technical Meeting on "Fusion Power Plant Safety23

of ? slides

IMPACT IMPACT onon thethe DESIGNDESIGNAs already done for ITER or IFMIF

generic approach+

consideration of internal hazards that are not regulation depending– Fire– Explosion– Flooding


Recommended