of 10
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
1/10
Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106
FEM simulations and experimental analysis of parameters of influence in the blanking process
M. Samuel
Faculty of Engineering , Mansoura Uni ersity, Post No. 35516 , Mansoura, Egypt
Received 8 July 1997
Abstract
This paper summarizes the results of simulating the blanking process based on the multi-purpose FEM code and MARC-2D.
The characteristics of this simulation are four node axisymmetric elements, rigid dies, and an updated lagrangian approach. The
work-hardening behaviour of the material has been derived from a relationship between the equivalent plastic strain, the
equivalent Von Mises stress, and the Vickers hardness in the shear zone. Several blanking simulations are performed and the
results compared with those obtained from an experimental study. The simulation results obtained under the effect of process
variables (e.g. punch–die clearance, tool geometries, and material properties) are in good agreement with the experimental results.
Furthermore, the load–stroke curves obtained from the simulation study show the same changes as those obtained from the
experimental study. However, a difference in the range of about 14% is noted. © 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Blanking process; Multi-purpose FEM code; MARC-2D
1. Introduction
In the blanking of metals, it is most important to
suppress the generation of fracture zones in the sheared
surface. The enhancement of the compressive stress in
the shear zones is effective in suppressing the fracture
or initiation of cracking [1].
The operation of blanking has been studied widely
with respect to sheared edge morphology [2,3], shearing
parameters optimization or forming defects [4,5]. More-
over, blanking is a constrained shearing operation thatinvolves elastic deflection, plastic deformation and frac-
ture of the work materials. The criteria for assessing the
quality of the sheared component are the finish of the
sheared surface and the deviation from the nominal
dimensions of the blank or the blank holder. Several
factors such as punch and die clearance, punch velocity,
and the mechanical properties of the materials under
investigation influence the constrained shearing opera-
tion. Some of these factors have been investigated
extensively [6–10]. However, the influence of the radius
on the tools has not yet been defined, in particular, theinfluence of the tool edge geometry on the shearing
force and the profile of the sheared surface on the
component. Recent investigations [11 – 15] have estab-
lished the relationship between the process signature,
the sheared surface profile, and the punch and die radii.
However, several aspects of constrained shearing (with
different shearing edge geometry of the blanking tool)
have yet to be evaluated: these aspects are reported
herein.
In this paper, experimental analysis using punches
and dies with different radii, for work materials under
different conditions are considered. To be competitive
in the global market, manufactures strive to produceparts at lower cost, in less time, and of higher quality.
The use of FEM simulation is increasing for investiga-
tion and optimizing the blanking process. It is possible
to drastically reduce the lead time of new parts and
products by proper implementation of a simulation
technique into development and research. Many time-
consuming experiments can be replaced by computer
simulations [16–19]. Therefore, highly accurate results
of sheet metal forming may be obtained by applying the
FEM simulation. In the work reported here, a sim-
plified simulation model will be created using MARC.This model describes the blanking process of a circular
blank using a 40 mm diameter die. Moreover, the FEM
0924-0136/98/$ - see front matter © 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII S0924-0136(98)00083-1
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
2/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 98
model of the material under investigation is calculated
for two cases: one with a small die clearance (C /T )=
2%, and the other with a large die clearance (C /T )=
23%. In addition, to verify the model, a series of
blanking tests will be performed for the calculated
geometries.
2. Material model
A cold-rolled strip of aluminium killed (Al. K.) steel
is used in the simulation work. One batch of the
specimens was annealed for 2 h at 850°C and then
cooled in a furnace. The mechanical properties of the
test specimens are shown in Table 1.
During the blanking process, large equivalent plastic
strain occurs. It is assumed that the material is isotropic
and that yielding follows the Von Mises yield criterion.
The following equation is used to model the material
behaviour in MARC:
̄ =K ¯ n (1)
where ̄ is the effective stress, ¯ is the effective strain, K
is the material constant, and n is the strain-hardening
exponent. Eventually, the hardness and the equivalent
Von Mises stress can be determined by postulating a
linear relationship between stress and hardness [17] as:
Table 2
Geometric and kinamatic parameters investigated
CommentsDimensionsValueParameter
(C /T )Clearance % C = (D−d )/2
Punch velocity mm s−11.0
mm 2% ClearancePunch diameter d 1=39.900
d 2=38.850 mm 23% Clearance
Die diameter mmD=40.000Rp1, Rd1=Punch and die mm
radii 0.20
Rp2, Rd2= mm
0.40
0.10Friction coeffi-
cient
Fig. 2. Mesh concentration in the shearing zone.Table 1
Mechanical properties of the test specimens
Cold rolledParameter AnnealedaUnits
Ultimate tensile strength 733MPa 618
433630Yield strength Mpa
Material constant (K ) 483510Mpa
201206Modulus of elasticity (E ) GPa
0.510.46 — Strain hardening (n)
0.25 0.27Poisson’s ratio () —
Vickers hardness (H V 100) 152235 —
mm 2.5 2.5Nominal thickness (T )
a Annealing procedure: 850°C for 2 h and then slow cooling in the
furnace.
Fig. 1. Simulation model.
e=aH V+b (2)
where a and b are constants, H V is the hardness, and eis the Von Mises stress. Eq. (2) will be used in the strain
region from 0 to 1 with the data in Table 1. Based on
the linear relation between e and H V [17], and Eq. (2),
the hardness data can be transformed into equivalent
stresses. In this way a set of data concerning stress and
strain can be collected. These data will be substituted
into a model based on Voce given as:
eH V=
e−b
a (3)
Eq. (3) represents the final model used in the FEM
simulation.
After performing several preliminary simulation tests
to determine the reliability and repeatability of the
modified program, the following blanking parameters
are investigated: punch-die clearance, tool geometry,and material properties.
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
3/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 99
Fig. 3. The blanking tool: (a) with sharp die and punch corners; (b) with radiused die and punch corners.
3. FEM model
The multi-purpose software package MARC served
to make the FEM model. The blanking process is
axisymmetric, which means that it requires only a 2-
D model. Thus, it was sufficient to model only one
half of the tooling. Because of the large displacements
that occur, the lagrangian approach combined with arezoning technique is adopted. In this way, a new
mesh is generated each time an incremental step is
taken, this being needed due to the considerable mesh
distortion caused by small deformation. Fig. 1 shows
the simulation model. The actual tooling was used for
blanking round discs of 40 mm diameter. The sheet
material is considered as a plastic object whereas the
punch and die are defined as rigid bodies. In correla-
tion with actual practice, a blank holder with an in-
denter was moulded for guiding and holding down
the stock. Depending on the process that is beingsimulated, a loaded blank-holder that clamps the ma-
terial whilst blanking could be easily implemented.
An indenter was used to eliminate the sudden release
of the elastic energy of the press subsequent to the
initiation of fracture. Table 2 summarizes the geomet-
ric and kinematic values used in the simulation.
The number of elements used in this work is very
critical for each simulation. A large number of ele-
ments increases the accuracy of the results but dra-matically increases the calculation time. Therefore, a
very dense mesh was defined in the area of the shear-
ing zone and relatively large elements for the remain-
der of the part (Fig. 2). A total of 6000 axisymmetric
quadrilateral elements were used.
During the last phase of the blanking process, duc-
tile fracture occurs. A model was used to describe
ductile fracture that is based on the nucleation,
growth, and coalescence of voids in the matrix mate-
rial. Many experimental studies to establish ductile
fracture criteria in order to calculate the formabilitylimits of different materials have been reported in the
literature [18– 20]. Gurson emphasised the stage of
void growth in his original model reported in [21].
Tvergaard [22] improved Gurson’s model by taking
into account the effect of void interaction. Void nu-
cleation (such as in the works of Chu and Needleman
[23]) and coalescence (such as in the work of Tver-
gaard and Needleman [24–26]) have also been incor-
porated into the original model. Gurson’s model in
various forms has recently been applied to metal
forming processes which include sheet forming and
blanking processes [23]. In this work, Gurson’s mixedhardening model is used. This model is expressed as:Fig. 4. Definition of the portions of the sheared surfaces.
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
4/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 100
Fig. 5. Experimental load–stroke curves, for different tool geometry, clearance, and material conditions.
=3
2
eF
2+2 fq1 cosh
3B m2F
− (1+q1 f
2) (4)
where F is the equivalent stress for a mixed material, f
is the void fraction, q1 is the constant to improve theresponse of the original Gurson model, which is taken
as q1=1.5 based on Tvergaard [26], and B m is the
spherical portion of shifted stress. Evolution of voids is
assumed to consist of growth and nucleation portions
expressed as:
f = f growth+ f nucleation
where:
f growth=3(1− f )ē p (5)
in which ē
is the mean plastic strain rate. For theimplementation of Eq. (5) in MARC, a strain-con-
trolled nucleation is assumed, then:
f nucleation= f
S N 2exp −
1
2
¯ p− NS N
2n (6)
where f
is the volume fraction of void-forming parti-
cles, S N is the S.D. in the equivalent plastic strain rate,
¯ p is the accumulated plastic strain, and N is the mean
equivalent plastic strain. It is difficult to determine the
material parameters for such a model because they are
outside the scope of this study. Therefore the data
reported in [25,26] will be used in this study. Onlyparameter has been determined from testing the
microstructure, by counting the level of inclusions of
the material. Finally, a higher value of S.D. S N repre-
sents a material with a more homogeneous distribution
for void nucleation, so that voids nucleation also occursin the case of large strains.
4. Experimental procedure
A schematic diagram of the blanking tool is shown in
Fig. 3 whilst the blanking process parameters are given
in Table 2. The blank holder with an indenter shown in
Fig. 3 (b) was used to elimination the sudden release of
the elastic energy of the press subsequent to the initia-
tion of fracture. A load cell and a displacement trans-ducer were used to measure the blanking force and
punch displacement, respectively. A universal Instron
machine was used at a constant ram speed of 1.0 mm
s−1 for all tests.
5. Results and discussion
Fig. 4 shows that the shear edge contains four dis-
tinct zones, these being indentation; burnished surface;
fracture surface; and burr zones.
Examples of blanking force versus punch displace-ment for materials tested for different tool geometry
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
5/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 101
Fig. 6. Influence of the tool geometry, the punch–die clearance, and the material condition on the equivalent Von Mises stress: (on left) cold
rolled; (on right) annealed; for: (top) Rp, Rd=0.2 mm and C /T =2%; (middle) Rp, Rd=0.2 mm and C /T =23%; and (bottom) Rp, Rd=0.4 mm
and C /T =2%.
and clearance are shown in Fig. 5. The signatures
show that the maximum blanking force and punchdisplacement at crack initiation and the load required
to separate the blank from the stock are sensitive to
tool geometry, clearance, and condition of the mate-rial.
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
6/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 102
Fig. 7. As for Fig. 6, but for total equivalent plastic strain.
Figs. 6 and 7 show the equivalent Von Mises stress
and total equivalent plastic strain for different values of
punch and die radii, and clearance, for two materialconditions described earlier. The maximum value of the
stress and strain are 62.7 MPa and 1.84 mm mm−1 for
cold rolled Al. K. steel for Rp, Rd=0.2 mm and
C /T =2%, whilst the stress and strain values are de-creased by about 1.8 and 35%, respectively, when the
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
7/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 103
Fig. 8. Influence of the tool geometry, the clearance, and the work material on the experimental cross-section of the blank: (top) cold rolled Al /
k. steel; (bottom) annealed Al. k. steel; (left) Rp, Rd=0.2 mm and C /T =2%; (centre) Rp, Rd=0.2 mm and C /T =23%; and (right) Rp, Rd=0.4
mm and C /T =2%.
punch and die radius increases for cold rolling at the
same value of clearance (C /T =2%). Also, the value of
Von Mises stress is decreased by about 3% when the
clearance increases (C /T =23%). In the above men-
tioned explanation, it is noted that the values of Von
Mises stress for both of the materials are affected by
the clearance and the tool geometry, Moreover, con-
cerning the influence of the clearance on the totalstrain, it was found that the plastic strain increases as
the clearance increases for each cold rolled and an-
nealed Al. k. steel (Fig. 7). This is a consequence of
plastic deformation of the surface material in the shear
zone. As regards the effect of the material properties on
the Von Mises equivalent stress and plastic strain, it is
clear that the Von Mises stress and plastic strain reduce
by about 8–20% and 2–16%, respectively, compared to
the cold rolled Al. K. steel (Figs. 6 and 7). The form of
crack propagation that dominates the final shape of the
sheared edge and the specific shearing resistance isshown in Fig. 8. From this figure the influence of the
tool geometry and clearance on the accuracy of the
sheared edge is seen clearly for each material. The
increase of the punch and die radius causes increased
plastic deformation before shearing starts. The result is
an increased zone of indentation (a rounded edge) and
burr height, whilst the shear zone (the burnished sur-
face) decreases for both the cold rolled and the an-
nealed Al. K. steel. Furthermore, Fig. 8 shows the
effect of mechanical properties on the accuracy of the
sheared edges from the aspect of the fracture surface or
the angle of the fracture zone and burr height. Theangle of the fracture zone and the burr height are
greater in the blanking of annealed steel than in the
blanking of cold-rolled Al. K. steel. From the above
explanation it can be said that the accuracy of the
sheared edge is dependent on the tool geometry, the
clearance, and the material specifications.
Finally, the effects of strain hardening, tool geome-
try, and clearance on the evolutions of void fractions
and coalescence based on Gurson’s work as improvedby Needleman and Tvergaard are shown in Figs. 9 and
10. Comparing the different cases in Fig. 9, it is noted
that the gradients along the sheared edges are consider-
ably higher in the calculated hardness than in the
experimental hardness data. This can be explained as
follows: hardness can not be measured extremely close
to the edges. In order to do so, extrapolation towards
the edges is necessary. Extrapolation, in this case by
means of the least squares method in combination with
singular value decomposition, entails risks. In order to
overcome this problem, a first-order polynomial fit isused. However, as a consequence, the gradients mea-
sured on the edges are inevitably smaller than the real
hardness gradients. It can also be noted from Fig. 9
that the strain-hardened volume and the average strain
hardening increase with increasing clearance.
Lastly, the effects of clearance on the growth of the
voids is shown in Fig. 10 In the actual simulation, for
the value of clearance (C /T =2%) the void growth is
much greater at an early stage compared with that for
the large clearance (C /T =23%). However, in practice,
void growth will lead to initial cracks. These initial
cracks stop growing very soon and do not initiatefurther cracks.
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
8/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 104
Fig. 9. Calculated and measurement of the microhardness of materials tested with different tool geometry and clearance: (top) cold-rolled Al. k.steel (Rp, Rd=0.2 mm and C /T =2%); (middle) cold-rolled Al. k. steel (Rp, Rd=0.2 mm and C /T =23%); and (bottom) cold-rolled Al. k. steel
(Rp, Rd=0.4 mm and C /T =2%).
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
9/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 105
Fig. 10. Influence of the clearance size on the growth of the voids at constant punch and die radii: (on left) C /T =2%; and (on right) C /T =23%.
6. Conclusions
From the analysis of the blanking process under
several factors such as punch and die radii, die clear-
ance, and material properties, using FEM simulations
and comparison with experimental tests, the following
conclusions may be drawn: (1) The punch penetration
prior to fracture increases with the increase of the
punch and die radii. Also, the values of equivalent Von
Mises stress and total plastic strain decreases as the
punch and die radius increase. (2) The plastic strain
increases when the clearance increases. (3) Large punch
and die radii suppress the initiation of cracks from the
shearing edge of the tool, increase the tool penetration,
the burr height and the roughness but reduce the extent
of the burnished surface. The angle of the fracture
zone and the burr height are greater in the blanking of
annealed than cold-rolled Al. k. steel. (4) The model
used to calculate crack formation is capable of deter-
mining crack initiation, but it is clearly not capable of
predicting crack propagation. Generally, the stimula-tion responds to parameter changes such as different
clearance, material specifications, and tool geometry
with a relatively good agreement with the experiment
results, the difference being about 14%. Due to the
importance of strain rate effects on the blanking pro-
cess, further study is being conducted, the results of
which will be published later.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to express his sincere thanks anddeepest gratitude to Professor Dr Eng Jerzy Gronos-
tjski for valuable guidance during the work reported in
this paper. Thanks are also due to Dr Eng Z. Zimniak
for many discussions and to the staff of the workshop
of the Metal Forming Department, Institute of Ma-
chine Building Technology, Technical University of
Wroclaw, Poland.
References
[1] T. Maeda, T. Nakagawa, Experimental investigation of fine
blanking, Sci. Pap. IPCR (1968) 65.
[2] M. Murakawa, Advanced Technology of Plasticity, vol. II,
Tokyo, 1984, p. 805.
[3] B. Bösch, F. Büzer, K. Hayashi, Advanced Technology of
Plasticity, vol. II, Tokyo, 1984, p. 815.
[4] A. Ghosh, V. Reghuram, P.B. Popet, A new approach to the
mechanics of the blanking operation, J. Mech. Work. Technol.
(1985) 215.
[5] H. Hayashi, M. Mori, K. Yoshida, Shape Failure in Flanging of
Sheet Metal, IDDRG, Amsterdam, 1986.
[6] R. Balendra, F.W. Travis, Static and Synamic blanking of steel
of varying hardness, Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res. (1970) 249.
[7] T.M. Chang, Shearing of metal blank, J. Inst. Met. (1951) 393.
[8] S. Fukui, K. Kondo, K. Meada, Smooth Shearing by Stepped
Profile Tool, CIBP, 1971, p. 57.
[9] I. Kouichi, I. Isao, K. Kazuyoshi, A new punching method for
shear droop-free shearing, J. JSTP 33 (381) (1992) 1172.
[10] C.M. Choy, R. Balendra, Effect of punch wear on blanking
process of sheet, 46 (1956) 58.
[11] C.M. Choy, Balendra, Expiremental analses of parameters influ-
encing sheared-edge profiles, in: Int. Conf. of Sheet Metal, vol. 2,
1996, p. 101.
[12] M. Itoh et al., Combined effects of hydrostatic process and
punching speed on blanking behaviour of 2S-aluminium, in:
Advanced Technology Of Plasticity, vol. I, 1987, p. 307.
[13] C.M. Choy, Balendra, The influence of tool geometry on blank-
ing characteristic, 9th Int. Congress of Forming, UK, 1995.
8/17/2019 Samuel 1998
10/10
M . Samuel / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 84 (1998) 97–106 106
[14] M. Murakawa, Burr free shearing, in: Advanced Technology of
Plasticity, vol. II, Tokyo, 1984, p.805.
[15] O. Svahan, Stamping and blanking, in: Int. Conf. of Sheet
Metals, vol. I, UK, 1996, p. 15.
[16] Z. Milosevic, F. Mousey, Simulation of sheared edge behaviour
in stretch flanging by a modified Fukui test, in: Advanced
Technology of Plasticity, vol. II, 1987, p. 697.
[17] J. Post, R. Voncken, FEM analyses of the punching process, in:
Int. Conf. of Sheet Metal, vol. II, 1996, p. 68.
[18] E. Taupin, et al., Material fracture and burr formation inblanking results of FEM simulation and comparison with exper-
imentals, J. Mater. Technol. 59 (1996) 68.
[19] A. Abdali et al, Numerical simulation of a sheet cutting proceed-
ing of the uniform, ISBN 90 (1995) 807.
[20] J. Lemaitre, A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile
fracture, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 107 (1985) 83.
[21] A.L. Gurson, Porous rigid– plastic materials containing rigid
inclusion yield function, Plast. Potential Void Nucl. Fract. 2
(1977) 357.
[22] V. Tvergaard, Material failure by void coalescence in localized
shear band, Int. J. Solids Struct. 18 (1982) 659.
[23] C.C. Chu, A. Needleman, Void nucleation effects in biaxially
stretched sheets, ASME Mater. Technol. 102 (1986) 249.
[24] A. Needleman, V. Tvergaard, Numerical study of the void
distribution effects on dynamic, ductile crack growth, Eng.Fract. Mech. 38 (1991) 157.
[25] V. Tvergaard, A. Needleman, Analyses of the cup-cone fracture
in a round specimen, Acta Met. 32 (1984) 157.
[26] V. Tvergaad, Ductile shear fracture at the surface of a bent
specimen, Mech. Mater. 6 (1987) 53.
.