+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to...

Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to...

Date post: 14-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: charles-e-colman
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 25

Transcript
  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    1/25

    VOC]FM T]G]FT MCT]PCD] DAVP]

    TAV]BFPO MCT]PCD] AI OFZ SAPE

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , x;

    TGOMGZGOG BAHMCOJT H]M/( ;; 7;77,DY,>0:70 "GEB#

    ^hgcotcii( ;; APGH GPJVLFO] PFWVFT]FM

    , gjgcost , ;;

    BFOPS MVOGS( ;;

    Mfifomgot/ ;;

    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , x

    LFLAPGOMVL AI HGZ CO TV^^AP] AI LA]CAO IAP YGDG]VP AI ]BFDAVP]T GVJVT] 79( 0>77 GOM OAYFL@FP 07( 0>77 APMFPT

    GOM IAP MCTLCTTGH AI ]BCT GD]CAO(AP( CO ]BF GH]FPOG]CYF( IAP G T]GS ^FOMCOJ G^^FGH

    Dbgrhfs F/ Dahlgo( Fsq/ "DD,7744#

    Dbgrhfs Dahlgo Hgw( ^HHD7::9 @ragmwgy( 07st IhaarOfw Sare( OS 7>>73,>>9=]fhfpbaof; "37:# 676,62:6Igx; "37:# 64=,903=

    ddNdbgrhfsdahlgohgw/dal

    Gttarofy iar Mfifomgot Bfory Muogy

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    2/25

    0

    ]G@HF AI DAO]FO]T

    G/ CO]PAMVD]CAO6

    @/ IGD]VGH GOM ^PADFMVPGH @GDEJPAVOM//9

    D/ GPJVLFO]///3

    7/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf @atb Cts Gujust 79tb gom cts Oavfl`fr 07st

    Armfrs Vomfr Puhf 9>"`#"=# Gs Yacm iar Hgde ai Tu`kfdt Lgttfr Kurcsmcdtcao(gom Mcslcss ]bcs Gdtcao///3

    g/ ]bf Daurt Bgs Hgdefm Tu`kfdt Lgttfr Kurcsmcdtcao iral tbfAutsft ai ]bcs Hctcjgtcao( @fdgusf ]bcs Gdtcao Bgs Ghwgys @ffo g

    Oao,Mcvfrsf @rfgdb ai Daotrgdt Tuct co ]rgmflgres Dhatbcoj//7>

    `/ Fvfo ci tbf Daurt Zgs Flpawfrfm ta Fxfrdcsf Tu`kfdt LgttfrKurcsmcdtcao gt tbf Autsft ai ]bcs Dgsf( Ct Hgdefm tbf PfqucsctfKurcsmcdtcao ta Cssuf tbf Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr//70

    0/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf Cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr Vomfr Puhf 9>@fdgusf Ct Pfsuhtfm Iral Lcstgef5 @fdgusf ai TgomgwgogsLcsrfprfsfotgtcaos gom Lcsdaomudt5 gom co tbf Cotfrfst ai Kustcdf/79

    g/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf Cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr Vomfr Puhf

    9>"g# Muf ta Hfjgh gom Igdtugh LcstgefUs\ Grcscoj Iral Avfrscjbtgom uomfr Puhf 9>"`#"7# Muf ta Lcstgef/79

    `/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf Cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr Vomfr Puhf9>"`#"4# Muf ta ^hgcotciis Lcsrfprfsfotgtcaos gom Lcsdaomudt( gom!aruomfr Puhf 9>"`#"9# iar Goy Atbfr Pfgsao ]bgt Kustcicfs Pfhcfi(Codhumcoj Tgomgwgogs Mflaostrgtfm Cotfotcao ta G`usf tbf Armfr Ci

    tbf Daurt Ghhaws Ct ta Ttgom//00

    4/ Ci tbf Daurt Icoms tbgt Ct ^assfssfm tbf Pfqucsctf Kurcsmcdtcao gt Ghh]clfs gom Mfdhcofs ta Ygdgtf tbf Gujust 79tb gom Oavfl`fr 07st Armfrs(

    Ct Tbauhm Ofvfrtbfhfss Ttgy tbf Fiifdt ai ]basf Armfrs ^fomcoj Gppfgh//0=

    M/ DAODHVTCAO//06

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    3/25

    4

    ]G@HF AI GV]BAPC]CFT

    Dgsfs

    Gdbtlgo v/ Ecr`y( LdCofrofy ) Tqucrf( HH^(

    =9= I/4m 402 "0m Dcr/ 0>>9#/70( 74

    Glfrcdgo ]rudecoj Gssyos( Cod/ v/ Ircsda(462 V/T/ 744( 7=6 "7362#/7:

    Dgtsechh Mfv/( H/H/D/ v/ ^gre ^hgdf Fotlyt Darp/(029 I/ Tupp/ 0m 4>3 "T/M/O/S/ 0>>4# ///04

    Mfoocs Lcdbfhs ^ramudtcaos( Cod/ v/ Egphgo(Oa/ 23 Dcv/ 4:09( 7323 V/T/ Mcst/ HFRCT 77947 "T/M/O/S/ Adt/ =( 7323#7:

    Flpcrf BfghtbDbacdf Gssur/( Cod/ v/ LdYfcjb(6=: V/T/ 9:: "0>>9# /76

    Bgmjfs v/ Saoefrs Pgdcoj Darp/(

    =2 I/4m 740> "0m Dcr/ 7336# 04

    B@F Hfgscoj Darp/ v/ Irgoe(=2 I/4m 904 "0m Dcr/ 7336# //0=

    Co rf Gl/ Fxprfss Ico/ Gmvcsars Tfdurctcfs Hctcjgtcao(

    Oa/ 7>,4433( 0>77 V/T/ Gpp/ HFRCT 000>3 "0m Dcr/ Oav/ 4( 0>77#//74

    K/G/ Gppgrfh Dap/ v/ G``aum(692 I/4m 43> "0m Dcr/ 0>>3# //7:( 73( 0>

    Eaeeaofo v/ Jugrmcgo Hcif Cos/ Da/(677 V/T/ 4:6 "733=#///7>( 74

    Pasfo`frj v/ Coofr Dcty @ragm/ Darp/(33 Dcv/ 36:3( 0>>7 V/T/ Mcst/ HFRCT 74730 "T/M/O/S/ Guj/ 4>( 0>>7#70

    Tdbchmbgus v/ Laf(446 I/0m 603 "0m Dcr/ 739=# 79

    Ttgodgta v/ Yfrsgdf(Oa/ 3= Dcv/ =730( 7336 V/T/ Mcst/ HFRCT 7>40=( "T/M/O/S/ Kuh/ 06( 7336#///7>( 77

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    4/25

    =

    ]gp ^u`hs/ v/ Dbcofsf Sfhhaw ^gjfs(

    306 I/ Tupp/ 070( 07: "T/M/O/S/ 7339#7>( 77

    Ttgtutfs gom Pfjuhgtcaos

    02 V/T/D/ 70300=

    02 V/T/D/ 7447:( 77

    02 V/T/D/ 7442:( 77

    02 V/T/D/ 749://:

    4: D/I/P/ 0/:0/73

    Ifmfrgh Puhfs ai Dcvch ^radfmurf

    Ifm/ P/ Dcv/ / 70"`#"7#//70

    Ifm/ P/ Dcv/ ^/ 9>"g#/79( 7:( 04

    Ifm/ P/ Dcv/ / 9>"`#"7#//79

    Ifm/ P/ Dcv/ / 9>"`#"4#//04

    Ifm/ P/ Dcv/ / 9>"`#"=#/////3( 70

    Ifm/ P/ Dcv/ / 9>"`#"9#//04

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    5/25

    6

    G/ CO]PAMVD]CAO

    Bfory Muogy "Bfory# cs g :9,yfgr,ahm kfwfhry mfscjofr/ Mfdhgrgtcao ai Bfory

    Muogy "bfrfcogitfr Muogy Mfdh/# gt 7/ Bf bgs `ffo g kfwfhry mfscjofr iar last ai

    bcs gmuht hcif( gom `fhcfvfs mfscjocoj gom sfhhcoj kfwfhry cs tbf aohy wgy bf dgo

    rfghcstcdghhy suppart bclsfhi/ Cm/ gt =/ Ci Tgomgwgog Bahmcojs Htm/ jfts cts wgy( Bfory

    wchh `f prfvfotfm iral uscoj bcs oglf co daoofdtcao wctb kfwfhry co vcrtughhy goy wgy

    gom fssfotcghhy `f `gocsbfm iral ghh usfs ai bcs oglf ao tbf Cotfroft( wbfrf larf

    dallfrdf co tbf huxury jaams sfdtar tgefs phgdf wctb fgdb pgsscoj yfgr/ Cm/ gt 73/

    Daodfrofm aohy wctb gdduluhgtcoj gs ludb aohcof rfgh fstgtf gs passc`hf( gom

    co mcsrfjgrm ai gjrfflfot"s# `ftwffo tbf pgrtcfs( Tgomgwgog bgs lcsrfprfsfotfm tbf

    truf sdapf ai cts trgmflgre rcjbts gom rfpfgtfmhy daoihgtfm trgmflgre gom oao,

    trgmflgre gom fvfo dallfrdcgh gom oao,dallfrdcgh usfs/ Voiartuogtfhy( tbf

    Daurts Oavfl`fr 07( 0>>7 Armfr "gom tbf Oavfl`fr 7=( 0>77 ]rgosdrcpt pravcmcoj tbf

    rfgsaocoj `fbcom tbgt Armfr# daotgco sfvfrgh igdtugh gom hfjgh frrars tbgt Tgomgwgog

    dgo g`usf( gom bgs g`usfm( co iurtbfrgodf ai cts a`kfdtcvfs/

    Iartuogtfhy( tbcs Daurt dgo rcjbt tbf sbcp `y vgdgtcoj cts rfdfot Armfr/ Comffm(

    tbf Daurt lustvgdgtf oat aohy tbf Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr( `ut ghh ai cts Armfrs co tbcs

    dgsf( gs ct hgdefm tbf rfqucsctf su`kfdt lgttfr kurcsmcdtcao ta cssuf tbfl/ Iral tbf

    autsft( tbcs dgsf bgs `ffo oatbcoj larf tbgo g oao,mcvfrsf `rfgdb ai daotrgdt suct co

    trgmflgres dhatbcoj( strgtfjcdghhy irglfm gs g Hgobgl Gdt dgsf/ @ut fvfo ci tbcs Daurt

    mfdhcofs ta vgdgtf cts Armfrs gom mcslcss tbcs dgsf( ct sbauhm ofvfrtbfhfss stgy tbf

    fiifdt ai ghh rfhfvgot Armfrs pfomcoj Bforys gppfgh ta tbf Tfdaom Dcrduct/

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    6/25

    9

    @/ IGD]VGH GOM ^PADFMVPGH @GDEJPAVOM

    Co 0>>3( Bfory Muogy gom bcs wfhh,rfspfdtfm kfwfhry dalpgoy( Bfory Muogy

    Mfscjos( ichfm g vahuotgry pftctcao iar rfhcfi uomfr Dbgptfrs : gom 77 ai tbf Voctfm Ttgtfs

    @goeruptdy Damf/ Mfdhgrgtcao ai Dbgrhfs Dahlgo "bfrfcogitfr Dahlgo Mfdh/#( Fxb/ G

    "^hgcotciis Dalphgcot gom Fxbc`cts# gt 76/ ]braujb go Lgrdb 72( 0>7> Gssft ^urdbgsf

    Gjrfflfot( ^hgcotcii Tgomwgog Bahmcojs Htm/ "Tgomgwgog# gdqucrfm dfrtgco gssfts(

    codhumcoj tbrff V/T/ ifmfrgh trgmflgre rfjcstrgtcaos( `ut oatg`hy( oatfxprfsshy codhumcoj

    g phgco,tfxt "ar sa,dghhfm stgomgrm dbgrgdtfr# rfjcstrgtcao co tbf warms BFOPS

    MVOGS/ Cm/ gt 02,03/ ]bf rfgsao iar tbcs wgs dhfgr; ofctbfr Bfory oar bcs dalpgoy

    bgm fvfr gpphcfm iar g ifmfrgh trgmflgre rfjcstrgtcao iar BFOPS MVOGS co phgco tfxt5

    tbf tbrff rfjcstrgtcaos awofm `y tbf dalpgoy wfrf ghh( co tbf warms ai tbf V/T/ ^gtfot

    gom ]rgmflgre Aiicdf( ZAPMT( HF]]FPT( GOM!AP OVL@FPT CO T]SHC[FM

    IAPL/ Cm/ gt 43( =0( =6 "flpbgscs gmmfm#/

    Zctb tbgt sgcm( TDBFMVHF @ ai tbf Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot mcm purpart ta

    codhumf glaoj Bforys gom bcs dalpgoys gssfts Ug\hh cotfroft sctfs gom wf`sctfs(

    malgco oglfs( dapyrcjbts( pgtfots gom trgmflgres gom cotfhhfdtugh prapfrty rcjbts(

    codhumcoj( wctbaut hclctgtcao( tbf trgmflgres Urfifrrfm ta g`avf/\ Cm/ gt 4>/ @ut

    daospcduaushy g`sfot iral tbcs hcst cs Bforys oglf( wbcdb bgm ofvfr `ffo rfjcstfrfm

    gs g trgmflgre fxdfpt co tbf iarl ai styhczfm mfscjos( last hcefhy `fdgusf aohy tbasf

    styhczfm mfscjos bgm `ffo daoscstfothy usfm gs trgmflgres( iar gppraxclgtfhy iarty

    yfgrs/ Muogy Mfdh/ gt 76/ ]bus( Bfory "rfgsaog`hy# ofvfr `fhcfvfm gom stchh mafs

    oat `fhcfvf tbgt bf scjofm gwgy tbf rcjbt ta usf bcs oglf co ghh dallfrdcgh rfspfdts

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    7/25

    :

    daodfrocoj kfwfhry mfscjo/ Cm/ gt 9/ Bgm Bfory `ffo uomfr tbgt clprfsscao( bf ofvfr

    wauhm bgvf scjofm tbf Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot wctb tbf tfrls prfsfotfm/ Cm/ gt

    7:/

    ]bf hgojugjf co TDBFMVHF @ ai tbf Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot( tbaujb

    davfrcoj tbf icfhm ai cotfhhfdtugh prapfrty rcjbts `ftwffo tbf pgrtcfs( sa ta spfge(

    fvfotughhy jgvf rcsf ta g mcsputf gs ta sdapf/ Ttrgtfjcdghhy irglcoj tbcs daotrgdt mcsputf

    gs go gdtcao iar trgmflgre coircojflfot( Tgomgwgog `raujbt suct co ifmfrgh daurt ao

    Gprch 0>( 0>77( purpartcoj ta covaef tbf Daurts kurcsmcdtcao uomfr 02 V/T/D/ 7447(

    7442( gom 749:/ Dahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ G gt 4( 7>/

    Ao Gujust 79( 0>77( tbf Daurt cssufm go Armfr fl`amycoj g sftthflfot `ftwffo

    tbf pgrtcfs( wbcdb pravcmfm co pgrt;

    Mfifomgot Bfory Muogy( BMM( BMMs giichcgtfs( BMMs mcvcscaos( gom BMMssu`scmcgrcfs( gs wfhh gs BMMs rfspfdtcvf prcodcpghs( aiicdfrs( gjfots( sfrvgots(flphayffs gom ghh atbfrs gdtcoj co mcrfdt gom!ar comcrfdt daodfrt ar pgrtcdcpgtcaowctb tbfl( `f gom bfrf`y grf pfrlgofothy rfstrgcofm ao g warhmwcmf `gscs iral;

    uscoj tbf Bfory Muogy ]PGMFLGPET ar goy lgre ar mfscjo tbgt codarpargtfsgom!cs Uscd\ daoiuscojhy sclchgr tbfrfta( gs g mfscjo( trgmf oglf( sfrvcdf lgre(

    `rgom oglf( malgco oglf( gom!ar mfscjogtcao ai saurdf ar arcjco ai goy jaam arsfrvcdfs rfhgtcoj ta kfwfhry ar tbf sghf( hcdfoscoj( lgouigdturf( gmvfrtcscoj(pralatcao( gom!ar mcstrc`utcao tbfrfai/ Ghh atbfr pravcscaos gs iurtbfr sft iartb cotbcs armfr/

    "Met/ Oa/ 73#/ ]bf Daurt stgtfm tbgt ct wauhm rftgcofm kurcsmcdtcao iar foiardflfot

    purpasfs/ Cm/ Bawfvfr( co ofctbfr tbf Kuhy 0>( 0>77 Armfr dhascoj tbf dgsf `ut

    rftgcoUcoj\ kurcsmcdtcao ta rfsahvf goy mcsputfs grcscoj uomfr tbf daosfot mfdrff oar tbf

    Gujust 79( 0>77 Armfr fomarscoj tbf sftthflfot gom dhascoj tbf dgsf fxdfpt iar

    foiardflfot mcm tbf Daurt hclct tbf hfojtb ai tclf ct wauhm rftgco sudb kurcsmcdtcao(

    spfdciy baw ct wauhm mftfrlcof wbftbfr g mcsputf mcm( co igdt( ighh wctbco tbf sdapf ai tbf

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    8/25

    2

    sftthflfot( ar comcdgtf baw ct wauhm rfsahvf sudb g mcsputf/ "Met/ 70( 73/#

    Jcvfo Tgomgwgogs gppgrfothy hclcthfss mfscrf iar ghh Cotfroft rfgh fstgtf co goy

    wgy daoofdtfm wctb Bfory( gom daovfrsfhy( Bforys cog`chcty ta lgef g hcvcoj wctbaut

    uscoj bcs oglf( sffMuogy Mfdh/ gt =( 6( g mcsputf g`aut tbf sftthflfot gjrfflfot

    uosurprcscojhy grasf/ ]bgt mcsputf dfotfrfm ao wbftbfr Tgomgwgog wgs fotcthfm ta tbf

    bforymuogy/oft malgco oglf "purdbgsfm `y Bforys icgodf Ircofttf Tclao( oatgt

    Bforys costrudtcao( gitfrtbf `goeruptdy bgm `ffo sftthfm( Muogy Mfdh/ gt 74# uomfr

    tbf Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot gom tbf Gujust 0>77 Tftthflfot Gjrfflfot/ "Met/ 02/#

    G pradffmcoj ao tbf g`avf,lfotcaofm cssuf wgs bfhm `fiarf tbf Daurt ao

    Oavfl`fr 7=( 0>77 "Oavfl`fr 7=tb pradffmcoj#( gt wbcdb tbf Daurt gppfgrs ta bgvf

    lgmf dfrtgco icomcojs ai igdt wctbaut go fvcmfotcgry `gscs co tbf rfdarm "sff( f/j/(

    Dahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ @ gt ]rgosdrcpt pgjf 4 "stgtcoj tbgt Ls/ Tclao wgs g praxy iar Lr/

    Muogy iar purpasfs ai tbf bforymuogy/oft malgco oglf rfjcstrgtcao#5 cm/ gt ]rgosdrcpt

    pgjf 3 "stgtcoj tbgt bforymuogy/oft malgco oglf gom bforymuogyNbatlgch/dal f,lgch

    gmmrfss grf vfry sclchgr## gom mrgwo hfjgh daodhuscaos salf frraofaus oatg`hy

    `gsfm oat ao trgmflgre hgw( `ut ao tbf Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot"sff cm/ gt 3 "]bcs

    cs phgcohy go Cotfroft wf`sctf tbgt `fhaojs ta Tgomgwgog( ar sbauhm `f( `fdgusf ct

    purdbgsfm ghh rcjbt( tcthf gom cotfrfst co tbgt wf`sctf gom malgco oglf/## ]bf Daurt

    cssufm g Tullgry Armfr madeftfm ao Oavfl`fr 07( 0>77 "Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr#(

    pravcmcoj tbgt tbf Daurt sbghh icom Mfifomgot co daotflpt uohfss bf gsscjos tbf

    bforymuogy/oft malgco oglf gom ghh atbfr cotfroft gddauots `fgrcoj bcs oglfta

    ^hgcotcii `y Oavfl`fr 00( 0>77/ "Met/ 49( flpbgscs gmmfm# ]bf `gscs iar tbf

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    9/25

    3

    fssfotcghhy uohclctfm sdapf ai bcjbhcjbtfm hgojugjf wgs oat dhfgr( gs lgoy cotfroft

    gddauots oaw co mcsputf "codhumcoj( last oatg`hy( g pfrsaogh( prcvgtf igdf`aae pgjf

    ofvfr usfm iar dallfrdcgh purpasfs# bgm oat `ffo su`stgotcvfhy gmmrfssfm murcoj tbf

    Oavfl`fr 7=( 0>77 pradffmcoj/ Tff jfofrghhyDahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ @/

    Tcodf tbf Daurt cssufm cts Armfr rfjgrmcoj ghh atbfr cotfroft gddauots(

    Tgomgwgog bgs jrawo codrfgscojhy gjjrfsscvf( gppgrfothy fl`ahmfofm `y tbf `ragm

    hgojugjf ai tbf Daurts Armfr( Bforys tflpargry pra sfstgtus( gom!ar tbf Mfifomgots

    gmvgodfm gjf/ TffMuogy Mfdh/ gt 04/ Co igdt( Tgomgwgogs dauosfh( ^ftfr @frjfr(

    wfot sa igr gs ta tbrfgtfo Bfory( g :9,yfgr,ahm lgo co paar bfghtb( `y stgtcoj co g

    Oavfl`fr 0=( 0>77 pbaof dghh tbgt ci Bfory mcm oat trgosifr bcs igdf`aae gom ]wcttfr

    gddauots ta Tgomgwgog( @frjfr wauhm bgvf bcl put co kgch avfr tbf bahcmgys/ Cm/ gt

    7( 0( 06/ ]bus( aut ai ifgr( Bfory sbut mawo bcs igdf`aae gom ]wcttfr gddauots ghtbaujb

    bf daotcoufs ta `fhcfvf bf bgs g rcjbt ta usf tbfl/ Cm/ gt 09/ Tgomgwgogs daotcoucoj

    tbrfgts grf dguscoj flatcaogh trgulg ta Bfory gom bgvf lgmf bcl girgcm ta lgcotgco

    goy cmfotcicg`hf prfsfodf ao tbf Cotfroft( wctbaut wbcdb bf wchh `f uog`hf ta fgro g

    hcvcoj( cm/ gt 09( 6( ar fvfo lgcotgco g sadcghprfsfodf/

    ]bcs ofwhy,rftgcofm dauosfh ichfm g Oatcdf ai Gppfgrgodf ao Laomgy( Mfdfl`fr

    6( 0>77( gom ichfm tbfsf latcao pgpfrs ao tbf sglf mgy/

    D/ GPJVLFO]

    7/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf @atb Cts Gujust 79tb gom cts Oavfl`fr 07stArmfrs Vomfr Puhf 9>"`#"=# Gs Yacm iar Hgde ai Tu`kfdt Lgttfr Kurcsmcdtcao(gom Mcslcss ]bcs Gdtcao

    Iral mgy aof( tbcs hctcjgtcao bgs `ffo oatbcoj larf tbgo g `rfgdb ai daotrgdt

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    10/25

    7>

    mcsputf `ftwffo oao,mcvfrsf pgrtcfs( rfqucrcoj cotfrprftgtcao oat ai ifmfrgh hgw( `ut aohy

    ai tbf pgrtcfs Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot "gom oaw( ai tbf Daurts Armfr gttflptcoj ta

    foiardf tbgt Gjrfflfot/# Ofctbfr tbf arcjcogh daotrgdt mcsputf oar tbf Daurts Armfrs

    gttflptcoj ta rfsahvf tbgt mcsputf dgo supphy( ar bgvf supphcfm( su`kfdt lgttfr

    kurcsmcdtcao co tbcs dgsf/ Tgomgwgog bgs tbf `urmfo ai pravcoj tbgt tbf Daurt

    passfssfm tbf rfqucsctf kurcsmcdtcao gt ghh tclfs( Eaeeaofo v/ Jugrmcgo Hcif Cos/ Da/( 677

    V/T/ 4:6( 4:: "733=#( gom iar tbf iahhawcoj rfgsaos( tbcs cs g `urmfo ct dgooat sustgco/

    g/ ]bf Daurt Bgs Hgdefm Tu`kfdt Lgttfr Kurcsmcdtcao iral tbf Autsft ai]bcs Hctcjgtcao( @fdgusf ]bcs Gdtcao Bgs Ghwgys @ffo g Oao,Mcvfrsf

    @rfgdb ai Daotrgdt Tuct co ]rgmflgres Dhatbcoj

    Iral tbf autsft ai tbcs hctcjgtcao( ^hgcotcii Tgomgwgog bgs gttflptfm ta irglf g

    ruo,ai,tbf,lchh( oao,mcvfrsf `rfgdb ai daotrgdt suct gs g Hgobgl Gdt gdtcao( co armfr ta

    covaef tbf kurcsmcdtcao ai tbf ifmfrgh daurts/ Bawfvfr( gs Kumjf Effogo stgtfm co

    Ttgodgta v/ Yfrsgdf( Oa/ 3= Dcv/ =7307336 V/T/ Mcst/ HFRCT 7>40=( gt +6 "T/M/O/S/ Kuh/

    06( 7336#( tbf iarlgh ghhfjgtcaos ai Ug\ dalphgcot lust ycfhm ta tbf su`stgodf ai tbf

    dhgcl/ ]bf daurt daotcoufm;

    UC\t cs wfhh sftthfm tbgt tbf ifmfrgh daurts ma oat bgvf su`kfdt lgttfr kurcsmcdtcao codgsfs wbfrf g trgmflgre cs lfrfhy tbf su`kfdt lgttfr ai g daotrgdt mcsputf/^hgcotciis iarflast grf gttflptcoj ta foiardf tbfcr daotrgdtugh rcjbts/ ]bf lfrfcovahvflfot ai Ug ifmfrghhy rfjcstfrfm trgmflgre\ mafs oat daoifr ifmfrgh

    kurcsmcdtcao avfr wbgt cs fssfotcghhy g daotrgdt mcsputf / / / / Co dgsfs wbfrf gdaotrgdt fstg`hcsbfs wbcdb pgrty awos g pgrtcduhgr trgmflgre( ct cs tbfdaotrgdt gom oat tbf Hgobgl Gdt tbgt mftfrlcofs tbf rcjbts ai tbf pgrtcfs/

    Cm/ gt +: "flpbgscs gmmfm#/

    Hcefwcsf( co ]gp ^u`hs/ v/ Dbcofsf Sfhhaw ^gjfs( 306 I/ Tupp/ 070( 07:

    "T/M/O/S/ 7339#( g phgcotcii dhgclfm tbgt ct bgUm\ fxdhuscvf rcjbts ta usf Ug\ lgre co tbf

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    11/25

    77

    Ofw Sare lftrapahctgo rfjcao( grjucoj tbgt Ug\ 7329 sftthflfot gjrfflfot jgvf tbcs

    rcjbt ta Uma sa/\ Kumjf Eafhth a`sfrvfm tbgt tbf phgcotciis purpartfm Hgobgl Gdt dhgcl

    covahvfUm\ qufstcaos ai daotrgdt cotfrprftgtcao aohy( gom tbus sbauhm `f mftfrlcofm `y

    tbf prcodcphfs ai daotrgdt hgw/ Cm/ ]bf Hgobgl Gdt( co daotrgst( fstg`hcsbfs

    lgreftphgdf ruhfs javfrocoj tbf daomudt ai pgrtcfs oat atbfrwcsf hclctfm/ Cm/

    Ttgodgtagom ]gpgrf costrudtcvf bfrf/ Tgomgwgogs suct gjgcost Lr/ Muogy bgs

    ghwgys `achfm mawo ta tbcs; TDBFMVHF @ ai tbf pgrtcfs Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot

    hcsts glaoj tbf gssfts ta `f trgosifrrfm Ug\hh cotfroft sctfs gom wf`sctfs( malgco

    oglfs( dapyrcjbts( pgtfots gom trgmflgres gom cotfhhfdtugh prapfrty rcjbts( codhumcoj(

    wctbaut hclctgtcao( tbf trgmflgres Urfifrrfm ta g`avf/\ Dahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ G gt 4>/

    Tgomgwgog bgs grjufm iar g `ragm cotfrprftgtcao ai tbcs pravcscao5 Lr/ Muogy tgefs g

    ogrrawfr vcfw ai tbf darrfdt lfgocoj ai tbf apfrgtcvf daotrgdtugh hgojugjf/ @ut tbcs

    mcsputf g`aut daotrgdtugh cotfrprftgtcao( cotfrfstcoj tbaujb ct lgy `f( prfsfots oa

    ifmfrgh qufstcao uomfr tbf Hgobgl Gdt ar goy atbfr ifmfrgh hgw/

    Fvfo Tgomgwgogs Dalphgcot( wbcdb gttflpts ta covaef tbf kurcsmcdtcao ai tbf

    ifmfrgh daurts uomfr 02 V/T/D/ 7447 gom 7442( fssfotcghhy gmlcts tbgt tbcs cs( gt cts

    raat( g hgwsuct g`aut go ghhfjfm `rfgdb ai daotrgdt/ Co 0= ai tbgt Dalphgcot(

    Tgomgwgog ghhfjfs; Vpao coiarlgtcao gom `fhcfi( Mfifomgot bgs dbasfo ta pravcmf bcs

    jaams gom sfrvcdfs uscoj tbf coircojcoj BFOPS MVOGS trgmflgre mfspctf bcs

    eoawhfmjf tbgt Tgomgwgog purdbgsfm ghh rcjbts( tcthf gom jaamwchh ta tbf Bfory Muogy

    ]rgmflgres iral Mfifomgot gom Muogy Mfscjos/ Dahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ G( gt 9/

    Fvfo tbf Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot tbraujb wbcdb ^hgcotcii lgmf cts ghhfjfm

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    12/25

    70

    purdbgsf lgefs dhfgr "gh`fct `y clphcdgtcao# tbgt tbf daotrgdt oat ifmfrgh `uscofss

    tart hgw cs cotfomfm ta javfro tbf rcjbts gom rflfmcfs `ftwffo tbf pgrtcfs( stgtcoj;

    Oatbcoj co tbcs Gjrfflfot cs cotfomfm ta ar sbghh daoifr goy rcjbts ar rflfmcfs uomfr ar

    `y rfgsao ai tbcs Gjrfflfot ao ^frsaos atbfr tbgo Tfhhfr gom @uyfrU/\ Cm/ gt 0=

    "Tfdtcao 3/3#/ Co atbfr warms( tbf Gjrfflfot cscotfomfm ta daoifr rcjbts gom rflfmcfs

    ao tbf Tfhhfr gom @uyfr( wba bgppfo ta `f tbf pgrtcfs co tbcs dgsf/ Zbfrf Ugs bfrf\

    pgrtcfs fotfr cota go gjrfflfot javfrocoj tbfcr rfspfdtcvf rcjbts co g trgmflgre( tbf

    daotrgdt ctsfhi mficofs tbfcr rcjbts co tbf lgre gom mftfrlcofs tbf rflfmcfs gvgchg`hf iar

    go ghhfjfmhy uogutbarczfm usf ai tbf lgre/ Tadcfty iar tbf Gmvgodflfot ai Fmud/( Cod/

    v/ Jgooftt Da/( Cod/( 32 Dcv/ 0746 "HLL# 7333 V/T/ Mcst/ HFRCT :>>( +09 "T/M/O/S/ Kgo/

    07( 7333#/ Gs sudb( tbcs cs oat( gom bgs ofvfr `ffo( g dgsf iar tbf ifmfrgh daurts/

    Co hcjbt ai tbf iarfjacoj( ghh ai tbf Daurts Armfrs co tbcs hctcjgtcao sbauhm `f

    vgdgtfm uomfr Ifmfrgh Puhf ai Dcvch ^radfmurf 9>"`#"=# gom gom tbf dgsf sbauhm `f

    mcslcssfm wctb prfkumcdf uomfr Puhf 70"`#"7#/

    `/ Fvfo ci tbf Daurt Zgs Flpawfrfm ta Fxfrdcsf Tu`kfdt LgttfrKurcsmcdtcao gt tbf Autsft ai ]bcs Dgsf( Ct Hgdefm tbf PfqucsctfKurcsmcdtcao ta Cssuf tbf Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr

    Gs tbcs Daurt bgs a`sfrvfm( Ug\ sftthflfot gjrfflfot cs g daotrgdt( gom Ut\bf

    foiardfg`chcty ai daotrgdts jfofrghhy cs g qufstcao ai stgtf hgw( oat ifmfrgh hgw/

    Pasfo`frj v/ Coofr Dcty @ragm/ Darp/( 33 Dcv/ 36:3( 0>>7 V/T/ Mcst/ HFRCT 74730( gt +:

    "T/M/O/S/ Guj/ 4>( 0>>7# "Bfhhfrstfco( K/# "iaatoatf alcttfm#/ Fvfo gssulcoj grjufoma

    tbgt Tgomgwgog mcm prapfrhy covaef tbf su`kfdt lgttfr kurcsmcdtcao ai tbf Daurt gt tbf

    autsft ai tbf hctcjgtcao( tbgt kurcsmcdtcao bgs oaw `ffo fxbgustfm/

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    13/25

    74

    Gs tbf Tfdaom Dcrduct fxphgcofm co Gdbtlgo v/ Ecr`y( LdCofrofy ) Tqucrf( HH^(

    =9= I/4m 402( 444 "0m Dcr/ 0>>9# "cotfrogh dctgtcaos alcttfm#;

    ]bf pawfr ai tbf coifrcar ifmfrgh daurts cs hclctfm ta tbasf su`kfdts

    fodalpgssfm wctbco g stgtutary jrgot ai kurcsmcdtcao/ Ghtbaujb go fxfrdcsf aikumcdcgh pawfr Ulgy `f\ mfscrg`hf ar fxpfmcfot( g suct lgy oat pradffm g`sfotstgtutary gutbarczgtcao/ / / / Co sbart( kurcsmcdtcao dgooat sclphy `f fxpgomfm `y

    kumcdcgh mfdrff/

    ]bus( co gmmrfsscoj wbftbfr go cokuodtcao dauhm fstg`hcsb go comfpfomfot `gscs iar

    su`kfdt lgttfr kurcsmcdtcao avfr tbf gdtcao `fiarf ct( tbf Gdbtlgodaurt ruhfm tbgt tbf

    Cokuodtcao dgooat ctsfhi iurocsb kurcsmcdtcao avfr dhgcls tbgt ma oat ighh wctbco aof ai tbf

    trgmctcaogh stgtutary jrgots Uhcef ifmfrgh,qufstcao ar mcvfrscty kurcsmcdtcao/\ ]a bahm

    atbfrwcsf wauhm lgef lcodflfgt ai tbf hclctfm jrgots ai kurcsmcdtcao `fstawfm upao

    us/ Cm/ gt 44=/

    Pfdfothy( tbf Tfdaom Dcrduct bfhm tbgt jcvfo tbf daotfxt ai dhgss gdtcaos( wbcdb

    grf dalphcdgtfm( fxpfoscvf pradffmcojs covahvcoj g luhtctumf ai mciifrfot pgrtcfs gom

    patfotcgh pgrtcfs / / / Ug\ mcstrcdt daurt tbfrfiarfbgs tbf pawfr ta foiardf go aojacoj

    armfr gjgcost rfhctcjgtcao sa gs ta pratfdt tbf cotfjrcty ai g dalphfx dhgss sftthflfot avfr

    wbcdb ct rftgcofm kurcsmcdtcao/ Co rf Gl/ Fxprfss Ico/ Gmvcsars Tfdurctcfs Hctcjgtcao( Oa/

    7>,4433( 0>77 V/T/ Gpp/ HFRCT 000>3( gt +6> "0m Dcr/ Oav/ 4( 0>77#/ Bawfvfr( tbcs

    dauosfh bgs dalf gdrass oa Tfdaom Dcrduct dgsf squgrfhy bahmcoj tbgt g ifmfrgh mcstrcdt

    daurt lgy rftgco pfrpftugh gom atbfrwcsf uohclctfm kurcsmcdtcao avfr tbf foiardflfot ai g

    rautcof sftthflfot gjrfflfot `ftwffo twa pgrtcfs( sclphy `y fomarscoj ct gs g daosfot

    mfdrff/ Zbchf tbf Tuprflf Daurt gdeoawhfmjfm tbcs prgdtcdf co Eaeeaofo v/ Jugrmcgo

    Hcif Cos/ Da/( 677 V/T/ 4:6( 427,20 "733=#( ct mcm sa aohy co mcdtg5 co tbf vfry sglf

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    14/25

    7=

    apcocao( tbf Daurt pravcmfm g rflcomfr tbgt Uc\t cs ta tbf bahmcojs ai aur dgsfs( rgtbfr

    tbgo tbfcr mcdtg( tbgt wf lust gttfomU/\ Cm/ gt 4:3/

    Co tbf gppgrfot g`sfodf ai `comcoj gutbarcty( tbfrf cs jaam rfgsao iar tbf Daurt ta

    icom tbgt ifmfrgh mcstrcdt daurts lgy oat drfgtf tbfcr awo `u``hfs ai su`kfdt lgttfr

    kurcsmcdtcao avfr tbf foiardflfot ai spfdcicd sftthflfot gjrfflfots tbgt ma oat rgcsf

    qufstcaos ai ifmfrgh hgw/ Dfrtgcotycs aof sudb rfgsao; ofctbfr tbf Daurts Kuhy 0>(

    0>77 Armfr dhascoj tbf dgsf `ut rftgcoUcoj\ kurcsmcdtcao ta rfsahvf goy mcsputfs grcscoj

    uomfr tbf daosfot mfdrff oar tbf Gujust 79( 0>77 Armfr fomarscoj tbf sftthflfot gom

    dhascoj tbf dgsf fxdfpt iar foiardflfot hclctfm tbf hfojtb ai tclf ct wauhm rftgco sudb

    kurcsmcdtcao( spfdciy baw ct wauhm mftfrlcof wbftbfr g mcsputf mcm( co igdt( ighh wctbco tbf

    sdapf ai tbf sftthflfot( ar comcdgtf baw ct wauhm rfsahvf sudb g mcsputf/ "Met/ 70( 73/#

    Co tbf g`sfodf ai prfsdrc`fm pradfmurfs( wbfo g mcsputf avfr tbf sftthflfot

    gjrfflfot mcm grcsf co tbcs dgsf( tbf Daurt mcm oat flphay daovfotcaogh igdt,icomcoj taahs

    tbgt wauhm `f gvgchg`hf co g ofw( iuhh,ihfmjfm foiardflfot suct/

    Costfgm( tbf Daurt lgmf

    sfvfrgh frraofaus icomcojs ai igdt( fssfotcghhy sug spaotf/ Iar fxglphf( tbf Daurt

    sullgrchy stgtfm murcoj tbf Oavfl`fr 7=( 0>77 pradffmcoj tbgt Ls/ Tclao wgs g

    praxy iar Lr/ Muogy iar purpasfs ai tbf bforymuogy/oft malgco oglf rfjcstrgtcao(

    Dahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ @ gt 4( `ut tbcs wgs oat igdtughhy gddurgtf/ TffMuogy Mfdh/ gt 74

    "C mcm oat costrudt ly icgodf( Ircofttf Tclao( ta purdbgsf tbf bforymuogy/oft malgco

    oglf/# Gt tbf vfry hfgst( tbf qufstcao prfsfotfm g mcsputfm cssuf ai lgtfrcgh igdt

    rfqucrcoj g kury mftfrlcogtcao( wbcdb wgs uogvgchg`hf muf ta tbf pasturf ai tbf dgsf/

    Hcefwcsf( tbf Daurt stgtfm murcoj tbf Oavfl`fr 7=tb pradffmcoj tbgt tbgt

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    15/25

    76

    bforymuogy/oft malgco oglf gom tbf bforymuogyNbatlgch/dal f,lgch gmmrfss grf

    vfry sclchgr( sudb tbgt tbfy sbauhm `f trfgtfm cmfotcdghhy iar purpasfs ai tbf Daurt s

    Armfr/ Dahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ @ gt 3/ @ut co igdt( tbfrf grf oulfraus igdtughmciifrfodfs

    `ftwffo g malgco oglf gom go f,lgch gmmrfss/ Iar fxglphf( g malgco oglf dgo

    lgef daotfot gvgchg`hf ta tbf jfofrgh Cotfroft,uscoj pu`hcd( wbchf go f,lgch gmmrfss

    dgooat/ Malgco oglfs "`y vcrtuf ai tbfcr g`chcty ta mcrfdt wf` usfrs ta daotfot pastfm

    ao wf`sctfs# grf dgpg`hf ai pfriarlcoj g lgreftcoj iuodtcao( wbchf go f,lgch gmmrfss

    dgooat prgdtcdghhy pfriarl sudb g iuodtcao/ ]bcs cssuf hcefhy rfqucrfs fxpfrt tfstclaoy/

    Gs wctb tbf Daurts icomcoj ao tbf praxy cssuf( tbf Daurts cogddurgtf igdtugh

    icomcojs ao tbf malgco oglf!f,lgch gmmrfss cssuf "tbf hgttfr ai pgrtcduhgr rfhfvgodf co g

    mcsputf daodfrocoj trgmflgres# rfvfgh tbgt igst,trgdefm foiardflfot pradffmcojs grf chh,

    suctfm iar tbf gmkumcdgtcao ai mcsputfm igdtugh qufstcaos/ Oatg`hy( tbf V/T/ Tuprflf

    Daurt bgs iauom tbgt tbfrf lgy wfhh `f g hcof ai kurcsmcdtcaogh scjocicdgodf `ftwffo

    dfrtgco dgsfs prfsfotUcoj\ g ofgrhypurf cssuf ai hgw / / / tbgt dauhm `f sftthfm aodf gom

    iar ghh gom tbfrfgitfr wauhm javfro oulfraus Uifmfrgh\ dgsfs( gom dfrtgco igdt,`auom

    gom sctugtcao,spfdcicd dgsfs tbgt grf cofhcjc`hf iar ifmfrgh daurt gmkumcdgtcao/ Flpcrf

    BfghtbDbacdf Gssur/( Cod/ v/ LdYfcjb( 6=: V/T/ 9::( :>>,:>7 "0>>9#/

    Icoghhy( ghhawcoj pgrtcfs ta daovfrt g prcvgtf sftthflfot daotrgdt cota go aiicdcgh

    daosfot mfdrff tbgt purparts ta jrgot g ifmfrgh daurt kurcsmcdtcao avfr tbf foiardflfot ai

    tbgt daotrgdt ruos mcrfdthy dauotfr ta tbf wfhh,fstg`hcsbfm ruhf tbgt pgrtcfs lgy oat wgcvf

    a`kfdtcaos ta hgde ai su`kfdt,lgttfr kurcsmcdtcao/ Gom tbcs cs oat truf aohy ai hctcjgots5

    ifmfrgh daurts( taa( bgvf oa wgrrgot ta fxpgom Daojrfss kurcsmcdtcaogh jrgot `y kumcdcgh

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    16/25

    79

    mfdrff/ Cm/ gt 939/

    Co sbart( prgdtcdgh( stgtutary( gom daostctutcaogh daoscmfrgtcaos wgrrgot vgdgtur ai ghh

    Armfrs cssufm iahhawcoj tbf pgrtcfs sftthflfot gjrfflfot gom rfsuhtcoj mcslcssgh/ ]bgt

    tbf prgdtcdf ai rftgcocoj kurcsmcdtcao iar foiardflfot purpasfs lcjbt `f dallao dgooat(

    ai daursf( coaduhgtf tbgt prgdtcdf iral sdrutcoy uomfr iuomglfotgh hfjgh prcodcphfs/

    0/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf Cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr Vomfr Puhf 9> @fdgusfCt Pfsuhtfm Iral Lcstgef5 @fdgusf ai Tgomgwgogs Lcsrfprfsfotgtcaosgom Lcsdaomudt5 gom co tbf Cotfrfst ai Kustcdf

    Fvfo ci tbf Daurt icoms tbgt ct passfssfm tbf rfqucsctf su`kfdt lgttfr kurcsmcdtcao gt

    ghh rfhfvgot tclfs( ct sbauhm ofvfrtbfhfss vgdgtf cts Oavfl`fr 07( 0>77 Armfr "gom ghh

    partcaos ai tbf Oavfl`fr 7=( 0>77 ]rgosdrcpt suppartcoj tbgt Armfr# uomfr vgrcaus

    pravcscaos ai Ifmfrgh Puhf ai Dcvch ^radfmurf 9>( iar luhtcphf rfgsaos/

    g/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf Cts Oavfl`fr 07st Tullgry Armfr VomfrPuhf 9>"g# Muf ta Hfjgh gom Igdtugh LcstgefUs\ Grcscoj Iral

    Avfrscjbt gom uomfr Puhf 9>"`#"7# Muf ta Lcstgef

    Ifmfrgh Puhf ai Dcvch ^radfmurf 9>"g# gutbarczfs g mcstrcdt daurt( ao g latcao ar

    ao cts awo( wctb ar wctbaut oatcdf( ta darrfdt g lcstgef grcscoj iral avfrscjbt ar

    alcsscao wbfofvfr aof cs iauom co g kumjlfot( armfr( ar atbfr pgrt ai tbf rfdarm/

    Hcefwcsf( Puhf 9>"`#"7# gutbarczfs g daurt ta jrgot rfhcfi iral g icogh kumjlfot( armfr( ar

    pradffmcoj iar( cotfr ghcg( lcstgef/ ]bf rfhfvgot lcstgef iar purpasfs ai Puhfs 9>"g#

    gom "`# lgy `f go frrar `y tbf mcstrcdt daurt/ Tff Tdbchmbgus v/ Laf( 446 I/0m 603( 647

    "0m Dcr/ 739=# "U]\bfrf cs comffm jaam sfosf co pfrlcttcoj tbf trcgh daurt ta darrfdt cts

    awo frrar gom( ci ct rfiusfs( co ghhawcoj g tclfhy gppfgh iral tbf rfiusgh5 oa jaam

    purpasf cs sfrvfm `y rfqucrcoj tbf pgrtcfs ta gppfgh ta g bcjbfr daurt( aitfo rfqucrcoj

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    17/25

    7:

    rflgom iar iurtbfr trcgh pradffmcojs( wbfo tbf trcgh daurt cs fqughhy g`hf ta darrfdt cts

    mfdcscaoU/\# Gs tbf Tuprflf Daurt bgs fxphgcofm( Puhf 9>"g# rfihfdts tbf gxcalgtcd

    igdt tbgt daurts bgvf tbf pawfr gom tbf mutyta darrfdt Uarmfrs\ wbcdb bgvf cssufm muf

    ta cogmvfrtfodf ar lcstgef/ Glfrcdgo ]rudecoj Gssyos( Cod/ v/ Ircsda( 462 V/T/ 744(

    7=6 "7362# "flpbgscs gmmfm#/ Iurtbfr( Puhf 9>"`# cs g rflfmcgh ruhf ta f hc`frghhy

    daostrufm/ Mfoocs Lcdbfhs ^ramudtcaos( Cod/ v/ Egphgo( Oa/ 23 Dcv/ 4:09 "L@L#( 7323

    V/T/ Mcst/ HFRCT 77947( gt +6 "T/M/O/S/ Adt/ =( 7323#/

    Zctb ghh muf rfspfdt ta tbf Daurt( tbf Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr gom tbf rfgsaocoj

    suppartcoj ct( gs fl`amcfm co tbf trgosdrcpt iral tbf Oavfl`fr 7=tb ^radffmcoj( rfihfdt

    sfvfrgh cogmvfrtfot hfjgh gom igdtugh lcstgefs tbgt kustciy vgdgtur ai tbf Armfr/ Last

    scjocicdgothy( tbf Daurt gppfgrs ta bgvf daoihgtfm tbf oatcao ai g dallfrdcghusf ai g

    oglf wctb g trgmflgreusf ai g oglf/ ]bcs mcstcodtcao cs rfhfvgot `fdgusf tbf partcao

    ai tbf daotrgdt `ftwffo tbf pgrtcfs foulfrgtcoj gssfts rfifrs ta cotfhhfdtugh prapfrty

    "codhumcoj trgmflgres# spfdcicdghhy( gom oat ta dallfrdcgh usfs ar fvfo oglfs/ Co

    tbf salfwbgt goghajaus dgsf ai K/G/ Gppgrfh Dap/ v/ G``aum( 692 I/4m 43>( 432 "0m

    Dcr/ 0>>3#( tbf Tfdaom Dcrduct fxphgcofm;

    U]\bf igdt tbgt KG pgcm g hgrjf prcdf iar tbf Kasfpb G``aum `rgom "gom fxcstcojhcdfoscoj gjrfflfots# mafs oat ofdfssgrchy lfgo tbgt KG purdbgsfm tbf rcjbt taprabc`ct G``aum iral uscoj bcs oglf ta rfifr ta bclsfhi co g oao,trgmflgresfosf/ ]bfrf cs oa pravcscao co tbf Tghf Gjrfflfot daovfycoj ghh aiG``aumy s rcjbts ta usf bcs oglf iar dallfrdcgh purpasfs(KG Gppgrfh( 637

    I/ Tupp/ 0m 4>9( 0>>2 ZH 0403644( gt +3( gom tbf mcstrcdt daurt wgs oat fotcthfmta supphy sudb g pravcscao co tbf oglf ai dallao sfosf( ludb hfss ta dghh ctfxprfssU\/

    "Flpbgscs gmmfm/#

    Gs co G``aum( tbf apfrgtcvf hgojugjf bfrf mafs oat prabc`ct ghh dallfrdcgh usfs

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    18/25

    72

    ai tbf oglf Bfory Muogy( gom tbf Daurt frrfm co ruhcoj atbfrwcsf/

    Gpgrt iral tbf Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot lfotcaofm g`avf( ct cs costrudtcvf ta

    fxglcof efy hgojugjf iral tbf Gujust 79( 0>77 Daosfot Mfdrff iral wbcdb tbf

    Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr mfrcvfm/ ]bgt Mfdrff prabc`cts uscoj tbf Bfory Muogy

    ]PGMFLGPET ar goy lgre ar mfscjo tbgt codarpargtfs gom!cs Uscd\ daoiuscojhy sclchgr

    tbfrfta( gs g mfscjo( trgmf oglf( sfrvcdf lgre( `rgom oglf( malgco oglf( gom!ar

    mfscjogtcao ai saurdf ar arcjco ai goy jaam ar sfrvcdfs rfhgtcoj ta kfwfhry ar tbf sghf(

    hcdfoscoj( lgouigdturf( gmvfrtcscoj( pralatcao( gom!ar mcstrc`utcao tbfrfai/ "Met/ Oa/

    73/# Vomfr tbf phgco hgojugjf ai tbcs pravcscao( iar tbf usf ai tbf oglf Bfory Muogy

    ta ighh wctbco cts sdapf( ct lust "g# codarpargtf gom"`# `f daoiuscojhy sclchgr ta tbf

    Bfory Muogy ]PGMFLGPET/ Co Tgomgwgogs Dalphgcot "Met/ Oa/ 7#( ct cmfotcicfm

    tbrff purpartfm BFOPS MVOGS ]rgmflgres "Dalph/ gt/ 76# oaof ai wbcdb

    dalprcsf tbf warms Bfory Muogy co phgco tfxt/ Fgdb ai Tgomgwgogs purpartfm

    BFOPS MVOGS ]rgmflgres daoscsts ai ZAPMT( HF]]FPT( GOM!AP OVL@FPT CO

    T]SHC[FM IAPL/ "Flpbgscs gmmfm/# ]bcs cs scjocicdgot( `fdgusf tbf V/T/ ^gtfot gom

    ]rgmflgre Aiicdf rautcofhy ghhaws rfjcstrgtcaos co styhczfm iarl tbgt ct wauhm rfiusf ta

    rfjcstfr co g oao,styhczfm iarl/ Tff( f/j/( KFGO TBA^ trgmflgre rfjcstrgtcao( VT^]A

    Pfj/ Oa/ 0329944/

    Iurtbfr( tbf V/T/ ^gtfot gom ]rgmflgre aiicdf rfdajoczfm tbgt tbf MVOGS

    rfjcstrgtcao ghsa co styhczfmtfxt wgs su`stgotcvfhy mciifrfot iral g rfjcstrgtcao iar

    BFOPS MVOGS/ Co VT^]A Aiicdf Gdtcao 0>::4=,>>6> "Dahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ D#( cssufm

    co rfspaosf ta tbf gpphcdgtcao iar tbf MVOGS lgre( tbf Aiicdf rfkfdtfmg spfdclfo

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    19/25

    73

    sbawcoj tbf styhczfm BFOPS MVOGS haja ao g kfwfhry `ax/ ]bf ]rgmflgre Fxglcofr

    fxphgcofm; ]bf spfdclfos grf ghsa uogddfptg`hf Ugs fvcmfodf ai usf co dallfrdf\

    `fdgusf tbfy ma oat lgtdb tbf mrgwcoj Uai tbf phgco,`ut,stchh,styhczfm MVOGS lgre/\

    ]bf mrgwcoj mcsphgys tbf lgre gs MVOGS/ Bawfvfr( tbcs mciifrs iral tbf mcsphgy ai tbf

    lgre ao tbf spfdclfo( wbfrf ct gppfgrs gs BFOPS MVOGS/ ]bf gpphcdgot dgooat

    glfom tbf mrgwcoj ta daoiarl ta tbf mcsphgy ao tbf spfdclfo `fdgusf tbf dbgrgdtfr ai

    tbf lgre wauhm `f lgtfrcghhy ghtfrfm/ 4: D/I/P/ 0/:0"g#U/\

    ]bf hgojugjf ai tbf Lr/ Muogy bgs gt oa pacot scodf tbf Gujust 79( 0>77 Armfr

    codarpargtfm goy ai tbf styhczfm BFOPS MVOGS ]rgmflgres cota bcs wf`sctfs(

    aohcof praichfs( ar goytbcoj fhsf/ Muogy Mfdh/ gt 7:/ ]a tbf fxtfot tbf Daurt ruhfm

    atbfrwcsf( ct bgs dallcttfm g lcstgef ar avfrscjbt wgrrgotcoj vgdgtur uomfr Puhf 9>/

    @ut fvfo gssulcoj grjufomatbf BFOPS MVOGS ]rgmflgres wfrf

    codarpargtfm cota goy ai Lr/ Muogys lgtfrcghs( tbf usfs ai Lr/ Muogys oglf gt cssuf

    bfrf grf oat( gs g lgttfr ai hgw( trgmflgre usfs iar tbf purpasfs ai tbf pgrtcfs

    daotrgdts "hcef( iar fxglphf( g sclphf f,lgch gmmrfss ar ao g oao,uocquf igdf`aae

    praichf "gs appasfm g uocquf igdf`aae ^gjf( wbcdb cs uocquf gom lgy `f dallfrdcgh

    co ogturf/ Dahlgo Mfdh/ gt :,7>/# Gjgco( uomfr tbf phgco hgojugjf ai tbf Gujust

    79tb Armfr( Tgomgwgog cs oat fotcthfm ta goy rfhcfi co tbf g`sfodf ai hcefhcbaam ai

    daoiuscao( hft ghaof tbf fxtrflf rflfmy tbf Daurt jrgotfm ta tbf ^hgcotcii co cts tbf

    Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr/

    Pfspfdtiuhhy( tbcs dauosfh su`lcts tbgt tbf Daurt lgmf tbf sglf rfvfrsc`hf frrar

    ai hgw tbgt tbf mcstrcdt daurt lgmf co G``aum; co cssucoj cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr ta

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    20/25

    0>

    gsscjo ghh atbfr cotfroft gddauots `fgrcoj UBfory Muogys\ oglf ta ^hgcotcii( tbf Daurt

    frraofaushy rfsahvfm Utbf apfrgtcvf qufstcao\ wctbaut daoscmfrcoj tbf prapasfm usfs

    tbflsfhvfs( gom jgvf oa comcdgtcao ai bgvcoj daoscmfrfm sudb lgttfrs gs tbf sczf(

    hadgtcao( ar daotfxt ai tbf Umfscjofrs\ oglfU/\ G``aum( 692 I/4m gt =>0/

    Igdf`aae

    Zbchf sclchgr co oalfodhgturf( igdf`aae praichfsgrf iuomglfotghhy mciifrfot iral

    igdf`aae pgjfs/ Igdf`aae praichfs "sff( f/j/( Dahlgo Mfdh/ gt :,7># sfrvf g

    prclgrchy sadcgh iuodtcao; ta daoofdt aof wctb aofs ircfoms gom gdqugcotgodfs/ Oatg`hy(

    tbfrf cs oa hclct ta tbf oul`fr ai igdf`aae praichfstbgt dgo `f drfgtfm iar goy jcvfo

    oglf( ta tbf mau`thfss rfhcfi ai tbf Kabo Tlctbs ai tbf warhm/ Cm/ Igdf`aae pgjfs( `y

    daotrgst( aitfo sfrvf dallfrdcgh purpasfs( gom ma oat bgvf ircfoms( `ut rgtbfr g

    dfrtgco oul`fr ai Hcefs( ar igos/ Cm/ ]bfrf dgo `f aohy aof igdf`aae pgjf uomfr g

    dfrtgco oglf ar pbrgsf( cm/( gom Lr/ Muogy ofvfr drfgtfm aof/ Muogy Mfdh/ gt 70/

    Lr/ Muogy mcm drfgtf g igdf`aae praichf( wbcdb bgm gppraxclgtfhy 0>> ircfoms( `ut

    avfr 3>& ai tbfsf comcvcmughs grf( co igdt( sadcgh gdqugcotgodfs ai Lr/ Muogy gom oat

    dustalfrs ar igos/ Muogy Mfdh/ gt 77/ ]bfrf grf aitfo lgoyigdf`aae praichfs iar

    comcvcmughs wctb tbf sglf oglf( wbcdb prfvfots sclchgrhy,oglfm pfaphf iral `fcoj

    `hadefm aut ai tbf sadcgh oftware/ Dahlgo Mfdh/ gt 2/

    Ofvfrtbfhfss( iahhawcoj tbf Daurts cssugodf ai cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr(

    Tgomgwgog mflgomfm gddfss ta Lr/ Muogys igdf`aae praichf( wbcdb bf bgs ofvfr

    usfm iar su`stgotcgh dallfrdcgh purpasfs/ Muogy Mfdh/ gt 7>/ Comffm( tbf oao,

    dallfrdcgh ogturf ai Lr/ Muogys igdf`aae praichf cs uomfrsdarfm `y tbf igdt tbgt ct wgs

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    21/25

    07

    ^rcvgtf( sudb tbgt last ai tbf coiarlgtcao ct daotgcofm g`aut bcl wgs oat vcsc`hf ta tbf

    jfofrgh pu`hcd/ Cm/ Ci aof wfrf ta jcvf Tgomgwgog tbf `fofict ai tbf mau`t( aof lcjbt

    clgjcof tbgt Tgomgwgog wgots gddfss ta Muogys praichf `fdgusf ct gssulfs tbgt bcs

    igdf`aae ircfoms grf prclgrchy dustalfrs/ @ut tbgt cs oat tbf dgsf/ Muogy Mfdh/ gt

    77 "C usfm igdf`aae ta stgy co taudb wctb Uircfoms gom gdqugcotgodfs/\ C ma oat daoscmfr

    tbcs jraup ai pfaphf ta `f g dhcfot hcst( ar goytbcoj fhsf ai tbf sart/# Ci Tgomgwgog

    wcsbfm ta drfgtf cts awo praichfAP pgjfiar Bfory Muogy( ct dauhm ma sa tamgy "tbaujb

    Mfifomgot wauhm mcsputf tbf hfjghcty ai tbgt gdtcao/

    @ut fvfo jcvcoj Tgomgwgog tbcs `fofict ai tbf mau`t gt ta cts latcvfs ar

    lcsuomfrstgomcojs( tbf tbrfgtfocoj lgoofr co wbcdb cts rfprfsfotgtcvf mflgomfm

    gddfss ta Mfifomgots igdf`aae praichf jacoj sa igr gs ta tfhh g :9,yfgr,ahm co paar

    bfghtb pra`hfls tbgt bf wauhm `f put co kgch ci bf mcm oat hft g Tgomgwgog flphayff

    cota bcs gpgrtlfotta haj co ta bcs igdf`aae praichf( Muogy Mfdh/ gt 06 cs cofxdusg`hf(

    wgrrgotcoj vgdgtur ai tbf Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr ao cts awo "gs iurtbfr fxphgcofm `fhaw/#

    ]wcttfr

    Oar cs g ]wcttfr gddauot( `y ctsfhi( cobfrfothy hcefhy ta daoiusf gs ta saurdf( fvfo

    wbfo ct cs go fxgdt muphcdgtf ai g rfjcstfrfm lgre/ Sft tbf Daurt hulpfm ct co wctb ghh

    atbfr Cotfroft gddauots( gppgrfothy wctbaut bgvcoj coqucrfm cota baw tbcs phgtiarl

    warefm ar baw Lr/ Muogy bgm usfm bcs gddauot/ TffjfofrghhyDahlgo Mfdh/( Fxb/ @/

    ]bus( hfgvcoj gscmf iar tbf lalfot tbf igdt tbgt Lr/ Muogy bgs dgodfhhfmbcs ]wcttfr

    gddauot( ct cs coiarlgtcvf ta fxglcof bcs gdtugh twffts( lgoy ai wbcdb grf mfmcdgtfm

    prclgrchy ta mcspfhhcoj patfotcgh daosulfr daoiuscao( rgtbfr tbgo fodaurgjcoj ct/

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    22/25

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    23/25

    04

    bcs oglf ta ^hgcotcii( ci ghhawfm ta stgom( wauhm fiifdtcvfhy prfvfot Lr/ Muogy oat aohy

    iral fojgjcoj co goy dallfrdf ao tbf Cotfroft( `ut iral uscoj tbf Cotfroft gt ghh/

    Iurtbfr( tbf `ahmfm partcao ai tbf Armfr cs fotcrfhy uotftbfrfm iral tbf strcdthy hclctfm

    hgojugjf ai tbf pgrtcfs sftthflfot gjrfflfot( gs fl`amcfm co tbf Daurts Gujust 79tb

    Armfr/ Gs sudb( tbf Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr sbauhm `f vgdgtfm ao tbf jrauom ai

    lcstgef uomfr Puhfs 9>"g# gom "`#/

    `/ ]bf Daurt Tbauhm Ygdgtf Cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr Vomfr Puhf9>"`#"4# Muf ta ^hgcotciis Lcsrfprfsfotgtcaos gom Lcsdaomudt( gom!ar

    uomfr Puhf 9>"`#"9# iar Goy Atbfr Pfgsao ]bgt Kustcicfs Pfhcfi(

    Codhumcoj Tgomgwgogs Mflaostrgtfm Cotfotcao ta G`usf tbf Armfr Ci

    tbf Daurt Ghhaws Ct ta Ttgom

    Ifmfrgh Puhf ai Dcvch ^radfmurf 9>"`#"4# pravcmfs tbgt g daurt lgy ao latcao

    gom kust tfrls( Ug\ daurt lgy rfhcfvf g pgrty / / / iral g icogh kumjlfot( armfr( ar

    pradffmcoj iar / / / irgum "wbftbfr prfvcaushy dghhfm cotrcoscd ar fxtrcoscd#(

    lcsrfprfsfotgtcao( ar lcsdaomudt `y go appascoj pgrty/ Lcsrfprfsfotgtcaos ar

    lcsdaomudt wgrrgotcoj rfhcfi offm oat `f cotfotcaogh co ogturf/ Tff Dgtsechh Mfv/( H/H/D/

    v/ ^gre ^hgdf Fotl*t Darp/( 029 I/ Tupp/ 0m 4>3( 476 "T/M/O/S/ 0>>4#/

    ]bf lgoofr co wbcdb Tgomgwgog gom cts rfprfsfotgtcvfs bgvf daomudtfm

    tbflsfhvfs( g`uscoj tbf Daurts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr tbraujb lcsrfprfsfotgtcaos ta

    gom mfhc`frgtf cotclcmgtcao ai go ahmfr pra sfhctcjgot( kustcicfs vgdgtur ai tbf Oavfl`fr

    07st Armfr uomfr Ifm/ P/ Dcv/ ^/ 9>"`#"4# ar 9>"`#"9#/ Lr/ Muogys Mfdhgrgtcao spfges

    iar ctsfhi/ Tff( f/j/( Muogy Mfdh/ gt 07 "C `fhcfvf Tgomgwgogs daomudt "prclgrchy

    tbraujb cts gttarofys# bgs `ffo rfprfbfosc`hf gt lgoy pacots murcoj tbcs hctcjgtcao/#5

    00 "Co pgrt iar tbcs rfgsao( tbcs hctcjgtcao bgs tgefo g jrfgt flatcaogh tahh ao lf( wbcdb

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    24/25

    0=

    lgy wfhh bgvf gmvfrsfhy clpgdtfm ly bfghtb/#5 04 "Gitfr ly prfvcaus dauosfh

    wctbmrfw iral tbcs dgsf( Tgomgwgogs daomudt `fdglf ludb larf gjjrfsscvf/ Ct

    sfflfm tbgt tbfy grf trycoj ta cotclcmgtf lf( pfrbgps `fdgusf C wgs oat rfprfsfotfm iar

    g tclf( ar pfrbgps `fdgusf ai ly gjf/#5 0= "Co aof fspfdcghhy trgulgtcd fpcsamf(

    Tgomgwgogs hgwyfr( ^ftfr @frjfr( dghhfm lf ao Oavfl`fr 0=( 0>77( gt grauom 70;7>

    ^/L/( co wbcdb bf mflgomfm tbgt C trgosifr ly prcvgtf( pfrsaogh igdf`aae gddauot( ly

    ]wcttfr gddauot( gom tbf bforymuogy/oft malgco oglf "tbf hgst ai wbcdb bgs scodf `ffo

    trgosifrrfm/#5 06 "@frjfr stgtfm tbgt C bgm `fttfr trgosifr ghh ai tbfsf ta Tgomgwgog

    saao( gs bf mcm oat wgot ta bgvf ta put lf co kgch iar daotflpt/#5 09 "Gs haoj gs

    Tgomgwgog daotcoufs cts tbrfgts( C wchh daotcouf ta suiifr flatcaoghhy gom gl girgcm ta

    lgcotgco goy cmfotcicg`hf prfsfodf ao tbf Cotfroft/# Tgomgwgog sbauhm oat f

    rfwgrmfm iar cts `fbgvcar5 costfgm( tbf Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr sbauhm `f vgdgtfm/

    4/ Ci tbf Daurt Icoms tbgt Ct ^assfssfm tbf Pfqucsctf Kurcsmcdtcao gt Ghh ]clfsgom Mfdhcofs ta Ygdgtf Cts Armfrs co tbcs Gdtcao( Ct Tbauhm Ofvfrtbfhfss

    Ttgy tbf Fiifdt ai ]basf Armfrs ^fomcoj Gppfgh

    Ci tbf Daurt mfdhcofs ta vgdgtf cts Oavfl`fr 07st Armfr uomfr goy ai tbf

    iarfjacoj `gsfs( ct sbauhm ofvfrtbfhfss stgy tbf fiifdt ai tbgt Armfr pfomcoj gppfgh(

    pgrtcduhgrhy co hcjbt ai ^hgcotciis mflaostrgtfm cotfotcao ta g`usf ct/ ]a tbf fxtfot goy

    rfhfvgot Armfrs grf cotfrhadutary co ogturf( go cllfmcgtf gppfgh lgy `f tgefo iral

    tbfl uomfr 02 V/T/D/ 7030"g#"7# `fdgusf tbf Armfrs grf mcrfdtfm ta g pgrty(

    foiardfg`hf `y daotflpt( gom mfscjofm ta gddarm ar pratfdt salf ar ghh ai tbf

    su`stgotcvf rfhcfi saujbt `y g dalphgcot/ B@F Hfgscoj Darp/ v/ Irgoe( =2 I/4m 904(

    944,4= "0m Dcr/ 7336# "cotfrogh dctgtcaos alcttfm#/ Ai daursf( ta tbf fxtfot tbfsf Armfrs

  • 7/30/2019 Sandawana Holdings, Ltd. v. Dunay, 1-2011-CV-02712-AKH (S.D.N.Y.) (brief in support of motion to vacate, filed D

    25/25

    grf icogh( tbfy grf cllfmcgtfhy gppfghg`hf/

    CY/ DAODHVTCAO

    Ci Tgomgwgog cs ta bgvf cts wgy( Bfory wchh `f fiifdtcvfhy `gocsbfm iral uscoj

    bcs oglf ao tbf Cotfroft/ ]bcs wauhm oat aohy `f cofquctg`hf gom vfry hcefhy

    uodaostctutcaogh( ct cs g rfsuht gt amms wctb tbf pgrtcfs Gssft ^urdbgsf Gjrfflfot( tbf

    Gujust 0>77 sftthflfot "wbcdb daotgcos go fxdfptcao iar mfsdrcptcvf usfs#( gom tbf

    iuomglfotgh purpasf ai trgmflgre hgw ta prfvfot daoiuscao wbcdb bgs rfdfcvfm aohy

    pfriuodtary hcp sfrvcdf `y Tgomgwgog/ Co tbf cotfrfst ai kustcdf( igdtugh gom hfjgh

    lcstgefs lgmf( ^hgcotciis lcsrfprfsfotgtcaos gom lcsdaomudt( gom( last clpartgothy(

    tbf Daurts hgde ai kurcsmcdtcao ta cssuf tbf Armfr"s# co qufstcao ar fvfo bfgr tbcs dgsf(

    tbf Gujust 79( 0>77 gom Oavfl`fr 07( 0>77 Armfrs sbauhm `f vgdgtfm gom tbf dgsf

    mcslcssfm wctb prfkumcdf/ Mfifomgot wauhm jrfgthy gpprfdcgtf g ruhcoj iral tbf Daurt ao

    ghh cssufs `rcfifm co tbcs Lflargomul ai Hgw gs saao gs prgdtcdg`hf( gs Lr/ Muogy s

    ichcoj ai g Oatcdf ai Gppfgh wchh mcvfst tbf Daurt ai kurcsmcdtcao iar tbf tclf `fcoj/

    Mgtfm; Ofw Sare( Ofw SareMfdfl`fr 6( 0>77

    @y; QQQQ!s! Dbgrhfs F/ DahlgoQQQQDbgrhfs F/ Dahlgo( Fsq/Dbgrhfs Dahlgo Hgw( ^HHD7::9 @ragmwgy( 07st Ihaar

    Ofw Sare( OS 7>>73,>>9=]fhfpbaof; "37:# 676,62:6Igx; "37:# 64=,903=ddNdbgrhfsdahlgohgw/dal

    Gttarofy iar Mfifomgot Bfory Muogy


Recommended