2014 Blade Reliability Presentation

Field Trials of Vortex Generators Sandia Blade Workshop Albuquerque, NM

Ron Grife

Manager, Turbine Performance and Reliability

Aug 26-28, 2014

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation

2

Vortex Generators (VGs)

The typical turbine blade is designed as a compromise between the ideal/theoretical airfoil shape and the structural efficiency of a practical rotor set. As a result, turbine blades can suffer from stall losses (especially around the root section) due to the detachment of air flow.

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation

3

Vortex Generators (VGs)

Typical VG installations are applied to the root section of the blade, however, VGs can also be applied along the entire span of the blade to prevent stall for a variety of reasons

KEY FACTS

• Gains – production benefits from VGs are relatively small compared to typical power variations, validating gains is challenging

• Preparation – design and placement is unique to every blade type; requires intensive studies to visualize air-flow attachment

• Material - VGs may be made of metal or injection-molded plastic

• Installation – requires detailed installation procedure, but can usually be done uptower via rope access, platforms, etc. In some cases VG installs combined with other blade improvement

• Life - VGs are exposed to difficult environmental conditions and therefore need to be designed to be robust and maintenance-free

EDPR has installed VGs on 500+ turbines in 2014, trials in progress for additional units in coming years

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation 4

Met Mast Reference (IEC style)

• Two turbines near met in IEC conditions

• One of the turbines gets VG’s installed

• One turbine unmodified as a control

• Data requirements similar/same as IEC

• Relative production difference is VG gain

No Met Mast (Long Term Production)

• Various turbines selected at wind farm

• Turbine production monitored for 12 months

• Unmodified neighbor turbines provide reference

• Very little filtering (attempting to get “actual” production effects)

• Relative gain compared to unmodified neighbors is the VG effect

Types of Gain Analysis

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation 5

Summary of VG Trials

Turbine Trial Description Status

Turbine Type 1 Trialed 2 Different VGs Initial Measurements Complete

Turbine Type 2 Trialed 2 Different VGs + additional blade impr.

Initial Measurements Complete

Turbine Type 3 Trialed 3 Different VGs + additional blade impr.

Measurements in Review

Turbine Type 3 VGs in different positions in park: • Edge of array • waked positions • with control improvement

Measurement period almost complete

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation 6

VG Gain Comparisons

0 1 2

Re

lati

ve P

rod

uct

ion

Gai

n

Turbine Type

Turbine Type 1 - VG Type 1

Turbine Type 1 - VG Type 2

Turbine Type 2 - VG Type 1

Turbine Type 2 - VG Type 2

Turbine Type 2 - VG Type 3

• Gains on Type 2 are generally higher • Spread in results between turbine

types is similar • Analysis for type 3 not completed

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation 7

Environmental variation (Siting, TI, Shear, etc.)

VGs change the blades sensitivity to changes in local angle of attack which are driven by TI, shear

Configuration differences (pitch settings, blade condition)

Small changes in blade settings and actual conditions could have a relatively large influence on the overall effect from VGs

Anemometer impact (only issue if referencing WTG anemometer)

The change in aerodynamics at the blade root affects the flow in the area near the nacelle where the anemometer is located

Confounding Factors (Sources of variation)

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation 8

Anemometer Impacts

Analysis: Wind sensor readings on trial turbines compared to control neighbor in IEC conditions before and after VGs were installed. Results: Conclusions: VGs may have an impact on wind sensors. Results not unexpected, although magnitudes don’t have clear correlation yet.

Turbine Measured Impact Comments

Turbine Type 1 No Clear Change Large “seasonal” variations in correlation without VGs.

Turbine Type 2 Increase in Indicated WS Clear change in wind speeds across various VG types

Turbine Type 3 [Apparent Increase in Indicated WS, still verifying]

Initial indicators: Seasonal variations in baseline turbine, needs further study

2014 Blade Reliabiltiy Presentation 9

• VGs consistently produced positive gains in trials

• Gains appear to have a consistent variation according to trial results

• Gains appear to be larger on some turbine types

• Anemometers were impacted on some of the turbines that were tested

• Longer term trials showing that VGs have longevity to justify investment

Conclusions