+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Sandwich Construction Thin composite skins bonded to thicker, lightweight core. Large increase in...

Sandwich Construction Thin composite skins bonded to thicker, lightweight core. Large increase in...

Date post: 24-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: juniper-welch
View: 221 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
17
Sandwich Construction • Thin composite skins bonded to thicker, lightweight core. • Large increase in second moment of area without weight penalty. • Core needs good shear stiffness and strength. • Skins carry tension and compression loads.
Transcript

Sandwich Construction

• Thin composite skins bonded to thicker, lightweight core.

• Large increase in second moment of area without weight penalty.

• Core needs good shear stiffness and strength.• Skins carry tension and compression loads.

Sandwich panels are a very efficient way of providing high bending stiffness at low weight. The stiff, strong facing skins carry the bending loads, while the core resists shear loads. The principle is the same as a traditional ‘I’ beam:

Bending stiffness is increased by making beams or panel thicker - with sandwich construction this can be achieved with very little increase in weight:

The stiff, strong facing skins carry the bending loads, while the core resists shear loads.

Total deflection = bending + shear

Bending depends on the skin properties; shear depends on the core

Foam core comparison

PVC (closed cell)

- ‘linear’ – high ductility, low properties- ‘cross-linked’ – high strength and stiffness, but brittle- ~ 50% reduction of properties at 40-60oC- chemical breakdown (HCl vapour) at 200oC

Foam core comparison

PU

- inferior to PVC at ambient temperatures- better property retention (max. 100oC)

Phenolic

- poor mechanical properties- good fire resistance- strength retention to 150oC

Foam core comparison

Syntactic foam

- glass or polymer microspheres- used as sandwich core or buoyant filler- high compressive strength

Balsa

- efficient and low cost- absorbs water (swelling and rot)- not advisable for primary hull and deck structures; OK for internal bulkheads, etc?

Material

Foam includes– polyvinyl chloride(PVC)– polymethacrylimide– polyurethane– polystyrene– phenolic– polyethersulfone (PES)

Wood-based includes– plywood– balsa– particleboard

Property

Relatively low crushstrength and stiffnessIncreasing stress withincreasing strainFriableLimited strengthFatigueCannot be formed aroundcurvatures

Very heavy densitySubject to moisturedegradationFlammable

Honeycomb Advantages

Excellent crush strength andstiffnessConstant crush strengthStructural integrityExceptionally high strengthsavailableHigh fatigue resistanceOX-Core and Flex-Core cellconfigurationsfor curvatures

Excellent strength-to-weight ratioExcellent moisture resistanceSelf-extinguishing, low smokeversions available

Why honeycomb? List compiled by company (Hexcel) which sells honeycomb!

Sandwich constructions made with other core materials (balsa, foam, etc) have a large surface are available for bonding the skins.

In honeycomb core, we rely on a small fillet of adhesive at the edge of the cell walls:

The fillet is crucial to the performance of the sandwich, yet it is very dependent on manufacturing factors (resin viscosity, temperature, vacuum, etc).

Honeycomb is available in polymer, carbon, aramid and GRP. The two commonest types in aerospace applications are based on aluminium and Nomex (aramid fibre-paper impregnated with phenolic resin).

Cells are usually hexagonal:

but ‘overexpanded’ core is also used to give extra formability:

Core properties depend on density and cell size. They also depend on direction - the core is much stronger and stiffer in the ‘ribbon’ or ‘L’ direction:

5056 aluminium honeycomb

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

30 40 50 60 70 80

density (kg/m3)

shea

r m

od

ulu

s

L' direction

'W' direction

'L' direction plate shear modulus

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

20 40 60 80

density (kg/m3)

MP

a Nomex

Al

Aluminium generally has superior properties to Nomex honeycomb, e.g:

Aluminum Honeycomb• relatively low cost• best for energy absorption• greatest strength/weight• thinnest cell walls• smooth cell walls• conductive heat transfer• electrical shielding• machinability Aramid Fiber (Nomex)

Honeycomb• flammability/fire retardance• large selection of cell sizes, densities, and strengths• formability and parts-making experience• insulative• low dielectric properties

Sandwich Construction

• Many different possible failure modes exist, each of which has an approximate design formula.


Recommended