Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | catalina-fallows |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
santhi 1
Capacity of parties - Sec 1111. Who are competent to contract
Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject, and who is sound mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.
santhi 2
Capacity: Ability to do something, such as the mental ability to make a rational decision. Why capacity is important?
If a plaintiff seeks to enforce a contract, he must prove that the defendant had legal capacity to enter into a contract. Capacity is an essential element of a contract because it shows that a party understood the contractual obligation.
santhi 3
Contd -
santhi 4
MinorPerson domiciled in India, who is under 18
years of age.Law protects minor’s rights because they are
not mature and may not possess the capacity to judge what is good or what is bad
santhi 5
Position of minor’s agreement
Validity – An agreement with a minor is void-ab-intioCase – Mohiri Bibee vs Dharmdas Ghosh
santhi 6
Position of persons of unsound mindWho is a person of unsound mind
Sec 12 - A person is said to be of sound mind for the purpose of making a contract, if at the time when he makes it, he is capable – (a) to understand the terms of the contract. (b) to form a rational judgment as to its effect upon
his interests Ex ; idiots, lunatic, drunken person
santhi 7
Position of agreements with persons of unsound mindPersons of unsound
mind
1. Lunatic
(a) while he is of unsound mind
Capacity to contract
He cannot enter into any contract. Any agreement entered into by him during this period is altogether void and he cannot be held liable thereon.
santhi 8
Contd-b) While he is of sound
mind
(II) Idiots
He can enter into a valid contract and he is liable for such contract.
He cannot enter into any contract. Any agreement entered by him is void and he is liable thereon.
santhi 9
ContdDrunken person He cannot contract
while such delirium or drunkness lasts
santhi 10
Persons disqualified by lawAlien enemies – cannot enter into any
contractsForeign sovereigns and ambassadors –
can enter into contracts enforce those contracts in our courts but cannot be sued in our courts without the sanction
of the central government
Convicts – Cannot enter into any contract during the period of the sentence
santhi 11
Example of Alien
X, an Indian carries on a business in Pakistan.He enters into a contract with Y who carries on business in India. Immediately after the formation of the contract, a war broke out between India & Pakistan. In this case X becomes an alien enemy though he is an Indian and the contract between X & Y (if not against public policy) will be suspended for the duration of the war and revived after the war is over.
santhi 12
Contd -Company –
Contractual capacity is determined by the ‘object clause’ of the memorandum of association.
Any act done in excess of the power given is ultra vires [(i.e) beyond the power] and hence void.
Insolvent –Cannot sue and be sued. Cannot enter into contracts relating to his
property. When the insolvent is discharged the
disqualification is removed. santhi 13
ConsiderationWithout which no single promise is
enforceableA technical term used in the sense of quid
pro quo (ie, something in return).When a party promises to do something
he must get ‘something in return’. This something is defined as consideration.
santhi 14
Section 2(d)“When at the desire of the promisor, the
promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or abstain from doing something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise”.
santhi 15
Contd -
Ex – X promises to deliver the goods to Y and Y promises to pay Rs 1000 on delivery. In this case, the consideration for each of these promises is as under:For X’s promise - Y’s promise to pay Rs 1000
on deliveryFor Y’s promise – X’s promise to deliver the
goods
santhi 16
Elements of valid consideration
santhi 17
Essential elementsMove at the desire of the promisor – An act
constituting consideration must have been done at the desire or request of the promisor.Case – Durga Prasad vs Baldeo
May move from any person – immaterial as to who furnishes the considerationCase – Chinnayya vs Ramayya
santhi 18
Contd -It may be past present or future It must be of some value.It must be real and not illusorySomething other than the promisor’s existing
obligation Case – Ramachandra Chintamana vs Kala
Raju
santhi 19
Stranger to contractA stranger to consideration – can sue
because the consideration can be furnished or supplied by any person whether he is a promisee or not
A stranger to the contract - cannot sue because of the absence of the privity of the contractCase – Dunlop P tyre Co ltd vs Selfridge&Co
Ltd
santhi 20
Contracts without consideration(Exceptions to general rule,no consideration, no contract )Agreements made on account of natural love
and affectionPromise to compensate for past voluntary
servicePromise to pay a time barred debtCompleted giftAgency
santhi 21
Free consent It is essential to the creation of the contract
that the parties are ad idem,ie, they agree upon the same thing in the same sense at the same time and their consent is free and real.
Consent means an act of assenting to an offer.
santhi 22
Sec 13“Two or more persons are said to consent
when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.”
Effect of absence of consent – When there is no consent at all, the agreement is void ab-intio, ie, it is not enforceable at the option of either party.
santhi 23
FREE CONSENTTwo or more persons are said to consent
when they agree upon the same thing in the same sense. (Section 13)
Example: A agreed to sale car to B. But A has to cars X and Y. A thought of selling car X whereas B thought of purchasing car Y.
no consent =>no contract as there was no meeting of mind
santhi 24
Free consentSec 14
Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by (a) coercion (b)undue influence (c)fraud (d)misrepresentation or (e) mistake
No free consent – contract is usually voidable
santhi 25
Contd-
santhi 26
CoercionSec 15
A contract is said to be caused by coercion if it is obtained by (a) committing any act which is forbidden by the
Indian Penal Code (b) threatening to commit any act which is
forbidden by the Indian Penal Code (c) Unlawful detaining of any property (d) threatening to detain any property
santhi 27
CaseCase 1Ranganayakam vs Alwar Shetty, (1889) 13
Mad 214The relatives of a young widow threatened
her that they would not allow her to cremate the dead body of her husband unless she consented to the adoption of a boy as her son.
Held: The adoption is not binding on her on account of coercion
santhi 28
CaseMuttiah Chettiar vs Koruppen Chetty(1927) 50 Mad 786A person secured a release from liabilities
from his principal by refusing to hand over the books of account. The release deed was held to be voidable of the option of the principal.
Effect of coercion: Contract is voidable at the option of the party whose consent has been caused by coercion.
santhi 29
Undue influenceDominating the will of the other person to obtain
an unfair advantage over the otherSometimes the parties to the agreement are
related in such a way that one of them is able to dominate the will of the other.
It creates a mental or moral fear created by coercion. Consequently the party on whom undue influence is exercised is indirectly compelled to enter into the contract
santhi 30
Contd-Ex: A, having money advanced money to his
son B during his minority, upon B’s coming of age, obtains by parental influence, a bond from B for a greater amount than the sum due in respect of the advance. A employs undue influence
santhi 31
Fraud-Sec 17 "Fraud" means and includes any of the following acts
committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance, or by his agent, with intent to deceive another party thereto of his agent, or to induce him to enter into the contract:-
(1) the suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true, by one who does not believe it to be true;
(2) the active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact;
(3) a promise made without any intention of performing it (4) any other act fitted to deceive; (5) any such act or omission as the law specially declares to
be fraudulent.
santhi 32
Contd-Explanation.- Mere silence as to facts
likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud, unless the circumstances of the case are such that, regard being had to them, it is the duty of the person keeping silence to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.
santhi 33
Illustrations
a) A sells, by auction, to B, a horse which A knows to be unsound. A says nothing to B about the horse's unsoundness. This is not fraud in A.
(b) B is A's daughter and has just come of age. Here, the relation between the parties would make it A's duty to tell B if the horse, is unsound.
santhi 34
Contd-(c) B says to A - "If you do not deny it, I shall
assume that the horse is sound." A says nothing. Here, A's silence is equivalent to speech.
(d) A and B, being traders, enter upon a contract. A has private information of a change in prices which would affect B's willingness to proceed with the contract. A is not bound to inform B.
santhi 35
EffectSuit for recissionSuit for damages for fraud
Right of recession lost if—Affirmation of the contract even after
becoming aware of the fraud
santhi 36
MisrepresentationA false representation of fact made
innocently or non-disclosure of a material fact without the intention to deceive the other party
Aggrieved party can avoid or rescind the contract
santhi 37
Contd-Ex: A tells B, without checking records, that
in his factory 1000 tons of indigo is manufactured every month. A believes his assessment to be true. The actual production is found to be only 830 tons. A is guilty of misrepresentation.
Effect: Right to rescind the contract
santhi 38
MISTAKE
santhi 39
Mistake
santhi 40
MistakeBilateral/Mutual Mistake of Fact
If both parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreementEffect: Void Agreement
An erroneous opinion as to the value of the thing which forms the subject-matter of the agreement is not to be deemed a mistake as to a matter of fact.
santhi 41
ESSENTIAL OF A VALID CONTRACT FREE CONSENT (MISTAKE)ExamplesA agrees to sell to B a specific cargo of goods
supposed to be on its way from England to Bombay. It turns out that, before the day of the bargain, the ship conveying the cargo had been cast away and the goods lost. Neither party was aware of the facts. The agreement is void.
A agrees to buy from B a certain horse. It turns out that the horse was dead at the time of the bargain, though neither party was aware of the fact. The agreement is void.
santhi 42
ESSENTIAL OF A VALID CONTRACT FREE CONSENT (MISTAKE)Unilateral Mistake of one party as to matter
of fact.Effect: Not voidable
santhi 43
Sec21. Effect of mistakes as to law A contract is not voidable because it was
caused by a mistake as to any law in force in India; but a mistake as to a law not in force in [India] has the same effect as a mistake of fact.
IllustrationA and B make a contract grounded on the
erroneous belief that a particular debt is barred by the Indian Law of Limitation: the contract is not voidable.
santhi 44
ESSENTIAL OF A VALID CONTRACT FREE CONSENT (MISTAKE)Mistake as to Indian law
Effect: not voidableMistake as to foreign law
Effect: not voidableExample A and B make a contract grounded
on the erroneous belief that a particular debt is barred by the Indian Law of Limitation. The contract is not voidable.
santhi 45
Legality of the object and considerationObject and consideration of contract must
be lawful, otherwise the agreement is voidConsideration or object of contract is
unlawful in the following cases:(a) If it is forbidden by law(b) If it defeats the provision of any law(c) If it is fraudulent(d) If the court regards it as immoral or
opposed to public policy
santhi 46
Contd-If considerations and objects unlawful in
part is unlawful,.Effect: the agreement is void
Example: A promises to superintend, on behalf of B, a
legal manufacture of plants, and an illegal traffic in other articles. B promises to pay to A a salary of 10,000 rupees a year.
The agreement is void, the object of As promise, and the consideration
for Bs promise, being in part unlawful.
santhi 47
Agreements opposed to the public policyAgreements of trading with the enemyAgreement of stifling prosecutionAgreement in restraint of paternal rightsAgreement in restraint of personal libertyAgreements in restraint of trade
santhi 48
Other essentials Certainty of meaning – terms of contract
must be unambiguousPossibility of performance – An agreement
to do an impossible act is void Legal formalities - Must comply with
necessary formalities like writing, registration and stamping
santhi 49
Examples of uncertain/certain agreements
a) A agrees to sell to B " a hundred tons of oil ".
The agreement is void for uncertainty. There is nothing whatever to show what kind of oil was intended.
(b) A, who is a dealer in coconut-oil only, agrees to sell to B"one hundred. tons of oil".
The nature of As trade affords an indication of the meaning of the words, and A has entered into a contract for the sale of one hundred tons of coconut-oil.
santhi 50
Contd-(c) A agrees to sell to B one hundred tons of oil of
a specified description, known as an article of commerce.
There is no uncertainty here to make the agreement void.
(d) A agrees to sell to B " my white horse for rupees five hundred or rupees one thousand".
The agreement is void, There is nothing to show which of the two prices was to be given for buying the horse.
santhi 51