+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SAP - Credit Suisse

SAP - Credit Suisse

Date post: 04-Nov-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 16 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
38
DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS, INFORMATION ON TRADE ALERTS, ANALYST MODEL PORTFOLIOS AND THE STATUS OF NON-U.S ANALYSTS. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION ® Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access 08 April 2013 Americas/United States Equity Research Software SAP (SAPG.F) INCREASE TARGET PRICE HANA's Bringing Sexy Back to Database We view SAP HANA as the most disruptive product to database market share since SQL Server’s emergence in the 1990s. Based on our proprietary survey and detailed analysis of market sizing, we believe that consensus continues to underappreciate the sell-through opportunity of HANA, which we expect to drive meaningful upside to both revenue estimates and margin expectations. Business Warehouse. We estimate that the market opportunity for HANA underneath existing BW installations to equal €1.8 billion and incremental new deployments of BW over the next five years to equal €510 million. According to our survey of 90 large and midsized SAP customers (combined with the 76 respondents from a recent Gartner survey), 20.4% of BW customers intend to migrate to HANA in 2013 (versus only 8.8% in 2012). By 2017, 80.3% of the BW installed base is expected to be run on top of HANA. Business Suite & Business One. Given that SAP intends to price SAP HANA for Business Suite and Business One at 15% of SAP Application Value (SAV), we estimate the revenue opportunity for HANA underneath SAP’s applications installed base to equal €4.2 billion and new deployments to be 1.0 billion over the next five years. According to our survey (weighted for company size), customers intend to migrate 8.1% of their installed base of SAP applications to HANA in 2013 and 40.7% by the end of 2017. Applying the results from our survey, we calculated that HANA could generate up to 1.0 billion in software license revenue in 2013 versus our forecast of €685 million and guidance of €650-700 million. Over the next five years, HANA could drive €5.2 billion in software license revenue and reduce COGS 609 million (due to lowered database reseller fees). As a result, we believe both near- and medium-term forecasts are likely to prove too conservative, and we are therefore raising our target price to €70 from €65, raising our estimates and adding SAP to the European Focus List. Share price performance 34 44 54 64 Apr-11 Aug-11 Dec-11 Apr-12 Aug-12 Dec-12 Price Price relative The price relative chart measures performance against the DEUTSCHE BORSE DAX INDEX which closed at 7658.75 on 05/04/13 On 05/04/13 the spot exchange rate was €1./Eu 1. - Eu .77/US$1 Performance Over 1M 3M 12M Absolute (%) -5.6 -3.0 16.7 Relative (%) -2.3 -1.5 3.7 Financial and valuation metrics Year 12/12A 12/13E 12/14E 12/15E Revenue (Eu m) 16,304.0 17,998.2 20,002.4 21,329.4 EBITDA (Eu m) 6,074.00 6,574.63 7,510.94 8,270.23 Adjusted Net Income (Eu m) 3,610.0 4,247.2 4,909.5 5,508.7 CS adj. EPS (Eu) 3.03 3.57 4.14 4.65 Prev. EPS (Eu) 3.51 4.03 4.55 ROIC (%) 25.80 28.13 31.56 34.64 P/E (adj., x) 19.74 16.74 14.45 12.85 P/E rel. (%) 175.0 142.9 140.1 136.2 EV/EBITDA 12.4 11.0 9.1 7.7 Dividend (12/13E, Eu) 0.85 IC (12/13E, Eu m) 16,188.09 Dividend yield (%) 1.4 EV/IC 4.4 Net debt/equity (12/13E, %) -8.1 Net debt (12/13E, Eu m) -1,421.8 Number of shares (m) 1,228.50 Free float (%) BV/share (12/13E, Eu) 14.8 Source: FTI, Company data, Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse Securities (EUROPE) LTD. Estimates. Rating OUTPERFORM* Price (05 Apr 13, Eu) 59.76 Target price (Eu) (from 65.00) 70.00¹ Market cap. (Eu m) 73,415.41 Enterprise value (Eu m) 71,993.6 *Stock ratings are relative to the coverage universe in each analyst's or each team's respective sector. ¹Target price is for 12 months. Research Analysts Philip Winslow, CFA 212 325 6157 [email protected] Charles Brennan CFA 44 20 7883 4705 [email protected] Sitikantha Panigrahi 212 325 2686 [email protected] Zachary Lountzis 212 325 0930 [email protected] Harris Heyer 212 325 4742 [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: SAP - Credit Suisse

DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS, INFORMATION ON TRADE ALERTS, ANALYST MODEL PORTFOLIOS AND THE STATUS OF NON-U.S ANALYSTS. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION®

Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access

08 April 2013

Americas/United States

Equity Research

Software

SAP (SAPG.F) INCREASE TARGET PRICE

HANA's Bringing Sexy Back to Database

We view SAP HANA as the most disruptive product to database market share since SQL Server’s emergence in the 1990s. Based on our proprietary survey and detailed analysis of market sizing, we believe that consensus continues to underappreciate the sell-through opportunity of HANA, which we expect to drive meaningful upside to both revenue estimates and margin expectations.

■ Business Warehouse. We estimate that the market opportunity for HANA underneath existing BW installations to equal €1.8 billion and incremental new deployments of BW over the next five years to equal €510 million. According to our survey of 90 large and midsized SAP customers (combined with the 76 respondents from a recent Gartner survey), 20.4% of BW customers intend to migrate to HANA in 2013 (versus only 8.8% in 2012). By 2017, 80.3% of the BW installed base is expected to be run on top of HANA.

■ Business Suite & Business One. Given that SAP intends to price SAP HANA for Business Suite and Business One at 15% of SAP Application Value (SAV), we estimate the revenue opportunity for HANA underneath SAP’s applications installed base to equal €4.2 billion and new deployments to be €1.0 billion over the next five years. According to our survey (weighted for company size), customers intend to migrate 8.1% of their installed base of SAP applications to HANA in 2013 and 40.7% by the end of 2017.

Applying the results from our survey, we calculated that HANA could generate up to €1.0 billion in software license revenue in 2013 versus our forecast of €685 million and guidance of €650-700 million. Over the next five years, HANA could drive €5.2 billion in software license revenue and reduce COGS €609 million (due to lowered database reseller fees). As a result, we believe both near- and medium-term forecasts are likely to prove too conservative, and we are therefore raising our target price to €70 from €65, raising our estimates and adding SAP to the European Focus List.

Share price performance

34

44

54

64

Apr-11 Aug-11 Dec-11 Apr-12 Aug-12 Dec-12

Price Price relative

The price relative chart measures performance against the

DEUTSCHE BORSE DAX INDEX which closed at 7658.75 on

05/04/13

On 05/04/13 the spot exchange rate was €1./Eu 1. -

Eu .77/US$1

Performance Over

1M 3M 12M Absolute (%) -5.6 -3.0 16.7 Relative (%) -2.3 -1.5 3.7

Financial and valuation metrics

Year 12/12A 12/13E 12/14E 12/15E Revenue (Eu m) 16,304.0 17,998.2 20,002.4 21,329.4 EBITDA (Eu m) 6,074.00 6,574.63 7,510.94 8,270.23 Adjusted Net Income (Eu m) 3,610.0 4,247.2 4,909.5 5,508.7 CS adj. EPS (Eu) 3.03 3.57 4.14 4.65 Prev. EPS (Eu) — 3.51 4.03 4.55 ROIC (%) 25.80 28.13 31.56 34.64 P/E (adj., x) 19.74 16.74 14.45 12.85 P/E rel. (%) 175.0 142.9 140.1 136.2 EV/EBITDA 12.4 11.0 9.1 7.7

Dividend (12/13E, Eu) 0.85 IC (12/13E, Eu m) 16,188.09 Dividend yield (%) 1.4 EV/IC 4.4 Net debt/equity (12/13E, %) -8.1 Net debt (12/13E, Eu m) -1,421.8 Number of shares (m) 1,228.50 Free float (%) — BV/share (12/13E, Eu) 14.8

Source: FTI, Company data, Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse Securities (EUROPE) LTD. Estimates.

Rating OUTPERFORM* Price (05 Apr 13, Eu) 59.76 Target price (Eu) (from 65.00) 70.00¹ Market cap. (Eu m) 73,415.41 Enterprise value (Eu m) 71,993.6

*Stock ratings are relative to the coverage universe in each

analyst's or each team's respective sector.

¹Target price is for 12 months.

Research Analysts

Philip Winslow, CFA

212 325 6157

[email protected]

Charles Brennan CFA

44 20 7883 4705

[email protected]

Sitikantha Panigrahi

212 325 2686

[email protected]

Zachary Lountzis

212 325 0930

[email protected]

Harris Heyer

212 325 4742

[email protected]

Page 2: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 2

Table of Contents The Download… 3 Executive Summary 4 Investment Analysis 7

Topic #1: What is the Revenue Opportunity of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

(BW) on SAP HANA? 7 Topic #2: Are Customers Migrating SAP NetWeaver BW onto SAP HANA? 10 Topic #3: What is the Revenue Opportunity of Transactional SAP Applications (e.g.,

SAP Business Suite and SAP Business One) on SAP HANA? 13 Topic #4: Are Customers Migrating Transactional SAP Applications (e.g., SAP

Business Suite and SAP Business One) onto SAP HANA? 16 Topic #5: What about Net New Applications for SAP HANA? 22

Valuation 24 Estimates 28 Sources and References 34

Page 3: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 3

The Download… What’s the Call? ■ Based on our proprietary survey and detailed analysis of market sizing,

we believe that consensus continues to underappreciate the sell-

through opportunity of SAP HANA, which we believe will drive upside to

both revenue estimates and margin expectations.

What’s Consensus Missing? ■ Applying the results from our survey, we calculated that SAP HANA

could generate €1.0 billion and €5.2 billion in license revenue in 2013

and over the next five years, respectively, as well as reduce COGS by

€37 million and €609 million (due to lowered database resellers fees)

during these respective timeframes.

What’s the Stock Thesis? ■ Our thesis remains that enterprises are focused on supporting revenue

growth and improving productivity and are willing to spend on

applications addressing these goals (even in the currently uncertain

macroeconomic environment), particularly ERP consolidation, CRM,

HCM, procurement, and analytics. Additionally, as highlighted in The

Apps Revolution Manifesto—Volume 1: The Technologies and The

Apps Revolution Manifesto—Volume 2: The Markets, we believe that

upgrade and expansion cycles are underway across multiple enterprise

applications segments. Based on these factors, we expect sustained

growth in enterprise applications, which should continue to benefit SAP.

■ We view HANA as an innovative, disruptive technology, and we

continue to believe that Wall Street underestimates the near-term

(i.e., growing adoption of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse:

Powered by SAP HANA) and long-term (i.e., the release of in-memory

“killer apps” that will ultimately be as transformational to businesses as

client/server applications were in the 1990s) impact from SAP HANA.

What’s the Impact to the Model? ■ In order to incorporate his/her own assumptions to quantify the market

opportunity and recognized revenue for SAP HANA as the database

underneath SAP Business Suite, SAP Business One, and SAP

NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW), clients of Credit Suisse can

obtain a working version of the SAP HANA Licensing Worksheet by

contacting the Credit Suisse Software Team, Research & Analytics, or

his/her sales person.

■ Although we are raising our estimates for SAP for both 2013 and

beyond, we have shifted more of our software license revenue growth

to the second half of 2013. Nonetheless, our software license revenue

estimates for the March quarter remain ahead of consensus. (See

Exhibit 34 to Exhibit 36.)

■ Furthermore, although are revenue forecast is already above

consensus, our estimate include only 1.8% software license revenue

growth (excluding SAP HANA and mobile) on a compounded annual

basis through 2017. As such, we believe that SAP an easily sustained

double-digit operating profit growth for the foreseeable future.

What’s the Next Catalyst/Data Point? ■ SAP will host SAPPHIRE NOW on May 12-16, 2013, in Orlando, FL.

What’s the Valuation? ■ SAP trades at a NTM P/E multiple of 15.1 times our estimate, as

compared with the company’s five-year historical average multiple of

16.4.

Page 4: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 4

Executive Summary We believe SAP HANA’s tight integration with and optimization for SAP Business One,

SAP Business Suite, and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse, will provide a meaningful

value proposition for current SAP customers and, thus, a significant sell-through

opportunity for SAP, which we view as the most disruptive force in the database market

share since SQL Server in the 1990s. In order to quantify the market opportunity for SAP

HANA as the database underneath SAP Business Suite, SAP Business One, and SAP

NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW), we created the SAP HANA Licensing Worksheet.

(See Exhibit 1.)

Exhibit 1: Credit Suisse SAP HANA Licensing Worksheet SAP Business Suite and SAP Business One

Active installed base

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Software revenue € 224 € 291 € 555 € 777 € 993 € 1,509 € 1,900 € 1,932 € 2,459 € 2,581 € 2,291 € 2,147 € 2,361 € 2,783 € 3,102 € 3,408 € 3,606 € 2,605 € 3,410 € 4,107 € 4,659

Software revenue -- SAP 202 264 509 715 916 1,397 1,760 1,787 2,276 2,384 2,104 1,960 2,151 2,535 2,827 3,102 2,843 1,960 2,280 2,477 2,657

Software revenue -- SAP HANA 160 390

Software revenue -- BusinessObjects 471 424 593 653 718

Software revenue -- Sybase 288 522 558

Software revenue -- DB reseller 13 17 33 47 60 91 115 117 149 156 137 128 141 166 185 203 186 128 149 186 216

Software revenue -- Other 9 10 12 14 17 21 24 29 35 41 49 58 70 83 91 103 107 93 99 109 120

Annual churn (%) 5.3% 5.4% 5.3% 5.2% 5.1% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.6% 4.7% 6.1% 7.0% 6.9% 4.0% 4.4% 3.7% 1.4% 5.1% 4.7% 2.9% 5.6%

1992 202 192 181 172 163 155 148 141 134 128 120 112 104 100 95 92 91 86 82 79 75

1993 264 250 237 225 214 204 194 185 176 165 154 143 137 131 126 125 118 113 109 103

1994 509 483 458 436 415 395 377 359 337 314 292 280 268 258 254 241 230 223 211

1995 715 679 646 615 586 559 532 500 465 433 415 397 382 377 358 341 331 312

1996 916 872 830 790 753 718 674 627 583 560 535 515 508 482 459 446 421

1997 1,397 1,330 1,266 1,207 1,150 1,080 1,004 935 897 857 825 814 773 736 714 674

1998 1,760 1,676 1,598 1,523 1,430 1,329 1,237 1,187 1,135 1,093 1,077 1,023 974 946 893

1999 1,787 1,704 1,623 1,525 1,417 1,319 1,266 1,210 1,165 1,148 1,090 1,039 1,008 952

2000 2,276 2,168 2,037 1,893 1,762 1,691 1,616 1,556 1,534 1,456 1,387 1,347 1,271

2001 2,384 2,239 2,082 1,937 1,859 1,777 1,711 1,687 1,601 1,526 1,481 1,398

2002 2,104 1,956 1,821 1,747 1,670 1,608 1,585 1,505 1,434 1,391 1,314

2003 1,960 1,825 1,751 1,674 1,611 1,589 1,508 1,437 1,394 1,316

2004 2,151 2,064 1,973 1,899 1,873 1,778 1,694 1,644 1,552

2005 2,535 2,423 2,332 2,299 2,183 2,080 2,018 1,905

2006 2,827 2,721 2,683 2,547 2,426 2,355 2,223

2007 3,102 3,059 2,904 2,766 2,685 2,535

2008 2,843 2,699 2,571 2,495 2,356

2009 1,960 1,867 1,812 1,711

2010 2,280 2,213 2,090

2011 2,477 2,339

2012 2,657

SAP Application Value (active installed base) € 28,307

SAV % for SAP HANA, database edition for SAP BS and SAP BO 15%

Market opportunity for SAP HANA for SAP BS & SAP BO (active installed base) € 4,246

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of active installed base migrating to SAP HANA 0.1% 8.1% 21.6% 30.0% 37.0% 40.7%

Software revenue 5 343 574 356 297 158 1,729

Support revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS 0 21 98 156 142 119 537

Support revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (0) (12) (53) (85) (77) (64) (291)

Support revenue 0 10 45 71 65 54 246

Revenue € 0 € 353 € 619 € 428 € 362 € 212 € 1,974

Cost of goods sold (reduction) (€ 9) (€ 41) (€ 64) (€ 59) (€ 49) (€ 221)

New deployments

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CAGR

Software revenue (current CS estimates) € 4,659 € 5,120 € 5,811 € 6,037 € 6,315 € 6,647 7.4%

Software revenue -- SAP 2,657 2,736 2,874 3,018 3,168 3,326 4.6%

Software revenue -- SAP HANA 390 685 1,140 1,105 1,118 1,161 24.4%

Software revenue -- BusinessObjects 718 790 869 956 1,051 1,157 10.0%

Software revenue -- Sybase 558 586 603 620 637 652 3.2%

Software revenue -- DB reseller 216 199 194 200 194 194 -2.1%

Software revenue -- Other 120 125 132 139 148 156 5.4%

SAV % for SAP HANA, database edition for SAP BS 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0%

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS (gross) 410 431 453 475 499

Software revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (223) (234) (245) (258) (271)

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS (net) 188 197 207 218 228

Market opportunity for SAP HANA for SAP BS & SAP BO (new deployments 2013-17) € 1,038

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of new sales adopting SAP HANA 15.9% 25.7% 27.9% 36.8% 42.4%

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS 65 111 126 175 212 689

Software revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (35) (60) (69) (95) (115) (374)

Software revenue 30 51 58 80 97 315

Support revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS 4 21 45 73 110 252

Support revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (2) (11) (24) (40) (60) (137)

Support revenue 2 9 21 33 50 116

Revenue € 32 € 60 € 78 € 114 € 147 € 431

Cost of goods sold (reduction) (€ 28) (€ 54) (€ 71) (€ 102) (€ 132) (€ 388)

SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Active installed base

NetWeaver BW installations 16,954

Average GBs per NetWeaver BW installation 500

Compression of data 3.3

HANA, Extended Enterprise Edition price per 64 GBs € 46,154

Discounting 0%

Market opportunity for SAP HANA for SAP BW (active installed base) € 1,834

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of active installed base migrating to SAP HANA 0.0% 8.8% 29.2% 56.9% 67.5% 75.0% 80.3%

Software revenue 0 161 375 509 194 138 98 1,313

Support revenue 0 6 54 141 227 253 267 942

Revenue € 0 € 167 € 429 € 650 € 420 € 391 € 365 € 2,255

New deployments

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

NetWeaver BW installations 16,054 16,954 17,886 18,872 19,809 20,743 21,672

% growth y-o-y 5.3% 5.6% 5.5% 5.5% 5.0% 4.7% 4.5%

NetWeaver BW deployments 811 900 932 986 937 934 929

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BW € 101 € 107 € 101 € 101 € 101

Market opportunity for SAP HANA for SAP BW (new deployments 2013-17) € 510

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of active installed base migrating to SAP HANA 0.0% 8.8% 29.2% 56.9% 67.5% 75.0% 80.3%

Software revenue 0 9 29 61 68 76 81 315

Support revenue 0 0 3 12 25 39 54 132

Revenue € 0 € 9 € 33 € 72 € 93 € 115 € 134 € 447 Source: Credit Suisse.

Based on this analysis, we estimate that the market opportunity for software license

revenue for SAP HANA running underneath the 17,000 existing installations of SAP

NetWeaver BW to equal €1.8 billion and incremental deployments of SAP NetWeaver BW

over the next five years to equal €510 million. (See Exhibit 8 and Exhibit 12.) Furthermore,

based on SAP strategy to price SAP HANA for SAP Business Suite at 15% of SAP

Application Value (SAV), we calculated a software license revenue opportunity for SAP

HANA underneath the active installed base of transactional applications (e.g., SAP

Business Suite and SAP Business One) of €4.246 billion and underneath new

Page 5: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 5

deployments of these applications over the next five years of €1.04 billion. (See Exhibit 15

and Exhibit 23.)

To determine the potential revenue recognized from SAP HANA as the database

underneath SAP Business Suite, SAP Business One, and SAP NetWeaver Business

Warehouse (BW), we surveyed 90 large enterprise and upper midsized to midsized

business customers of SAP. When applying this data (which we weighted 70% for large

enterprises and 30% for upper midsized to midsized businesses, which is relatively

consistent with contribution of these customer segments to SAP’s software license

revenue) to our aforementioned market sizing estimates, we calculated that SAP could

recognize €1.0 billion and €5.2 billion in software license revenue in 2013 and over the

next five years in aggregate, respectively, from SAP HANA running underneath SAP

Business Suite, SAP Business One, and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse, as well

as standalone deployments. In comparison, we have included €685 million (versus

guidance of €650-700 million) and €5.2 billion in our financial forecast for SAP in 2013 and

over the next five years in aggregate, respectively. (See Exhibit 2.) Additionally, because

SAP has long resold databases along with its own applications (with an estimated attach

rate to new applications sales of approximately two-thirds), SAP could reduce the cost of

goods sold associated with database reseller agreements with Oracle, IBM, and Microsoft

by €37 million and €609 million during these respective timeframes by selling HANA as

opposed to these competing third-party databases.

Exhibit 2: SAP HANA Licensing Worksheet – Outputs vs. Credit Suisse Estimates

Credit Suisse Estimates -- SAP HANA Revenue Estimates

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

SAP Business Suite and SAP Business One 0 0 41 355 497 547 601 2,041

SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse 0 163 383 498 299 239 203 1,622

SAP BS, BO, BW 0 163 424 853 796 786 805 3,662

Non SAP BW/BS/BO 160 227 261 287 309 332 357 1,546

Software revenue 160 390 685 1,140 1,105 1,118 1,161 5,209

Support revenue 5 50 151 320 552 765 971 2,759

Revenue € 165 € 440 € 836 € 1,461 € 1,656 € 1,883 € 2,133 € 7,968

Survey / Worksheet -- SAP HANA Revenue

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

Active installed base 0 5 343 574 356 297 158 1,729

New deployments 0 0 30 51 58 80 97 315

SAP Business Suite and SAP Business One 0 5 373 625 414 377 255 2,044

Active installed base 0 161 375 509 194 138 98 1,313

New deployments 0 9 29 61 68 76 81 315

SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse 0 169 404 569 262 213 178 1,628

SAP BS, BO, BW 0 174 777 1,194 676 591 433 3,672

Non SAP BW/BS/BO 160 227 261 287 309 332 357 1,546

Software revenue 160 401 1,039 1,482 985 923 790 5,218

Support revenue 5 50 162 355 547 653 748 2,465

Revenue € 165 € 451 € 1,201 € 1,837 € 1,532 € 1,576 € 1,538 € 7,683

Cost of goods sold (reduction) (€ 37) (€ 95) (€ 135) (€ 161) (€ 181) (€ 609)

Source: Credit Suisse.

Furthermore, we have only included 15% and 10% year-over-year software license growth

in 2013 and 2014, respectively (as well as 7.5% long-term growth beyond 2014) for

deployments of SAP HANA not tied to SAP Business Suite, SAP Business One, or SAP

NetWeaver Business Warehouse, which we view as a very conservative forecast given

that software license revenue grew from €160 million in 2011 to approximately €227

million in 2012 for these types of implementations. Overall, based on our market sizing

and the results from our survey, we believe that our software license revenue estimates for

SAP HANA are materially biased upward for 2013 and 2014. Furthermore, considering

that the results of our survey reinforces our confidence in our 5-year forward software

license revenue forecast for SAP HANA running underneath SAP Business Suite, SAP

Business One, and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse of €5.2 billion, we believe that

our long-term software license revenue forecast for SAP as a whole of 7.4% on

compounded annual basis from 2013 through 2017 is also biased upward, considering

Page 6: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 6

that we have included only 3.0% and 5.0% in “core” SAP software license revenue in 2013

and in 2014 and beyond, respective, which we view as conservative given our positive

overall outlook for application spending. (See Exhibit 23.)

In order to incorporate his/her own assumptions to quantify the market opportunity and

recognized revenue for SAP HANA as the database underneath SAP Business Suite, SAP

Business One, and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW), clients of Credit Suisse

can obtain a working version of the SAP HANA Licensing Worksheet by contacting the

Credit Suisse Software Team, Research & Analytics, or his/her sales person.

Page 7: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 7

Investment Analysis Topic #1: What is the Revenue Opportunity of SAP

NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW) on SAP

HANA?

This first step in the phased delivery strategy for HANA essentially promoted migrating

more computational analytic applications to an in-memory platform, while maintaining

standard, predictable enterprise reporting on existing data warehouse platforms.1

Specifically, HANA 1.0 acted as a high-performing database for an

operational/departmental data mart for SAP BusinessObjects 4.0 that resides side-by-side

with a customer’s ERP or non-SAP data warehouse. A data mart differs from a data

warehouse in that a data mart is narrower in scope (typically holding only information from

one function or department), compared with a data warehouse’s primary function of

holding information from multiple functional areas.2 In comparison to traditional database

architectures, the HANA 1.0 architecture enables side-by-side operations of the traditional

database, wherein operational data is replicated into memory for near real-time

operational reporting. (See Exhibit 3.)

Exhibit 3: HANA 1.0 Architecture (a.k.a. “Side-by-Side”)—Traditional and In-Memory Run

in Parallel

Source: SAP.

In comparison to HANA 1.0, HANA 1.x, which has been referred as the “on-top” model,

acts as the primary, persistent data store for the data warehouse (in this case SAP

NetWeaver Business Warehouse), serving as a conduit between the data sources that

update HANA 1.x’s data store at near real-time speed and the data warehouse that

manages the analytic metadata and data provisioning process (e.g., SAP NetWeaver BW).

(See Exhibit 4.) To help sparse out the company-specific branding from industry jargon, an

enterprise data warehouse typically sits on top of a relational database (RDBMS) but

requires additional software to manage the data layers inside the data warehouse (e.g.,

scheduling, modeling, mapping, consistency mechanisms, an OLAP engine). SAP

NetWeaver BW 7.3 performs these additional processes in a single package and, thus,

does not serve as the database but the software managing the EDW and its underlying

semantics.3

Page 8: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 8

Exhibit 4: HANA 1.x (a.k.a. “On-Top”)—HANA as Primary Data Store for SAP NetWeaver

Business Warehouse and as Database Platform for New Applications

Source: SAP.

Although SAP NetWeaver BW was released 15 years ago and SAP has leveraged

in-memory technologies to improve the reporting performance of the data warehouse

since 2006, the deployment of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse: Powered by SAP

HANA marks a major step in the evolution of SAP’s database and business intelligence

roadmap. (See Exhibit 5.)

Exhibit 5: Evolving In-Memory Footprint with SAP NetWeaver BW

Source: SAP.

HANA 1.x accelerates not only standard and ad hoc queries, which require intensive data

reads from mission-critical InfoCubes (similar to BW Accelerator 7.x), but also accelerates

any Business Explorer (BEx) query built on any BW InfoProvider, because now all BW

data and metadata is stored, selected, and aggregated in-memory, and more and more

OLAP functions are executed by the computation layer of SAP HANA as opposed to the

application tier.4 As such, HANA 1.x not only dramatically accelerated but also simplified

the data warehouse environment. (See Exhibit 6.)

Page 9: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 9

Exhibit 6: Traditional OLTP and Data Warehouse Architecture vs. SAP HANA 1.x

Source: SAP.

Furthermore, as SAP increases interoperability and integration between SAP HANA and

Sybase IQ, we expect customers to be able natively to tier aged data out of memory into

Sybase IQ. (See Exhibit 7.)

Exhibit 7: SAP Enterprise Data Warehousing Vision

Source: SAP, Credit Suisse.

In order to determine the potential revenue opportunity for SAP HANA offered by SAP

NetWeaver BW with the product’s base of approximately 17,000 installations, we needed

to determine the amount of data that could be migrated into SAP HANA. We believe that

the average installation of SAP NetWeaver BW currently manages approximately 500 GBs

of data, and considering that column-based storage enables a high compression rate and

Page 10: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 10

significantly less data to be materialized, we have assumed an incremental data

compression rate of 3.3 times (i.e., an assumed data compression of 10 times versus

typical data compression of 3 times). Based on these assumptions, we estimate that

approximately 2.55 million GBs of data represent the current potential data migration

opportunity for SAP HANA from existing customers of SAP NetWeaver BW. Finally, our

research suggests that the average software license list price of SAP HANA is

approximately $60,000 (or approximately €46,000) per 64 GBs of data stored in SAP

HANA. Therefore, we estimate that the market opportunity for SAP HANA underneath

SAP NetWeaver BW to equal €1.8 billion. (See Exhibit 8.)

Exhibit 8: Revenue Opportunity for SAP HANA Running under SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse.

Topic #2: Are Customers Migrating SAP NetWeaver

BW onto SAP HANA?

In our survey of 90 large enterprise and upper midsized to midsized business customers of

SAP, customers expect to migrate 29.2% of existing SAP Business Warehouse (BW)

deployments to SAP HANA by the end of 2013, as compared with 8.8% that migrated in

2012. (See Exhibit 9.) Based on these responses, which are cumulative, 20.4% of BW

customers intend to migrate to HANA during 2013, a level of adoption during the year

more than twice the 8.8% that migrated in 2012.

Page 11: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 11

Exhibit 9: CIO Survey – “What percentage of your existing installed base of SAP

NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW) deployments do you intend to migrate onto SAP

HANA?”

8.8%

29.2%

56.9%

80.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

2012 2013 2014 2017

Source: Credit Suisse, Gartner.

Applying these results to our estimate market opportunity for SAP HANA underneath the

existing active installed base of SAP NetWeaver BW to equal €1.8 billion (see Exhibit 8),

SAP could recognize €375 million in 2013 and €1.313 billion in aggregate over the next

five years in software license revenue. (See Exhibit 10.)

Exhibit 10: Estimated Revenue Contribution based on CIO Survey Data – Active Installed

Base of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW) € in millions, unless otherwise stated

NetWeaver BW installations 16,954

Average GBs per NetWeaver BW installation 500

Compression of data 3.3

HANA, Extended Enterprise Edition price per 64 GBs € 46,154

Discounting 0%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of active installed base migrating to SAP HANA 0.0% 8.8% 29.2% 56.9% 67.5% 75.0% 80.3%

Software revenue 0 161 375 509 194 138 98 1,313

Support revenue 0 6 54 141 227 253 267 942

Revenue € 0 € 167 € 429 € 650 € 420 € 391 € 365 € 2,255

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse.

CIO Responses to “Please discuss the drivers/factors behind the decision to migrate

existing SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW) onto SAP HANA”:

■ “Speed is the main driver, and eventually moving to ERP on HANA without the need to

have a separate BW database copy.”

■ “We believe this is the right solution to address our group’s Big Data analytics

requirements, beginning with financials.”

■ “The main factor to migrate onto HANA is the speed of retrieval of the data in the SAP

system. We are also looking at cost and business need as well.

■ “Faster speed and easier support.”

■ “SAP HANA is an SAP integrated solution for the commercial users. It fulfills the

requirements for our organization’s future expansion.”

Page 12: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 12

■ “The fact that SAP BW is NOT a database (i.e., it does not offer the full functionality as

it is inherently limited) makes SAP HANA a valuable proposition. This leads us to

higher and better performance because everything resides in one ecosystem.”

■ “Reducing costs, more efficient platform, and centralization of functions.”

■ “Performance improvements in query, less administrative overhead.”

■ “We are planning to do a pilot project for HANA later this year. The speed of HANA will

enable analysis that is not currently possible. Almost all of our ERP data runs on SAP,

so it is a good fit.”

■ “Load-size and performance.”

■ “Use of in-memory technology, real-time, and Big Data.”

■ “Oracle licensing fee structure; single vendor integration advantages. Oracle is not

trivial to migrate away from – it is the clingy girlfriend of databases.”

■ “Data growth and to address complexities of analytics.”

■ “System performance improvement and reduction in response time are the primary

drivers.”

■ “Improved BI platform, better performance, more functionality.”

■ “Speed and flexibility.”

■ “Performance and speed are the main drivers – ability to run reports in seconds

instead of hours/scheduled in batch mode.”

■ “Most of all for speed and responsiveness of data retrieval.”

■ “Integration, process effectiveness, technology consistency.”

■ “Day by day increase in database size…and processing the data is the critical issue to

move towards fast processing information.”

CIO Responses to “Please discuss the drivers/factors behind the decision not to migrate

existing SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse (BW) onto SAP HANA”:

■ “We’re still testing, and we’re not compelled by the ROI yet to move it. Promised

technological data management improvements.”

■ “We are a discrete manufacturer, assembly, and engineer to order. There are not yet

enough ‘utilities’ for us in HANA, so the advantage would be marginal because we

already run SAP on a VMware platform that does not have any performance issue at

all.”

■ “We have not decided yet to migrate. We do not see the value in our business. We

have evaluated, and we have decided not to migrate in the short term.”

■ “We are not as sophisticated in our BI yet. Also, we see HANA as overkill for the cost.”

■ “We are most likely going to use a different BI strategy; however, we are evaluating

our options now in this space.”

■ “Due to cost.”

■ “We’ve had difficulties with other SAP implementations and have not heard a

compelling argument from SAP on the advantages to us of this project. Until we’re

convinced such a move has great value, our plans are to remain static with BW.”

■ “Integration with other sources of data in Oracle.”

Page 13: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 13

In our survey of 90 large enterprise and upper midsized to midsized business customers of

SAP, 76% of SAP customers intending to deploy SAP Business Warehouse (BW)

expected to do so on top of SAP HANA. (See Exhibit 11.)

Exhibit 11: CIO Survey – “Of the new deployments of SAP NetWeaver Business

Warehouse (BW), what percentage will run on top of SAP HANA?”

SAP HANA76%

Alternative database

24%

Source: Credit Suisse.

After existing 2011 with 16,054 installations of NetWeaver Business Warehouse

(representing 5.3% year-over-year growth), we believe that SAP added 800-1,000

installation during 2012 (equaling 5.6% year-over-year growth at the midpoint) and that

approximately half of these new deployments were on top of SAP HANA. Applying the

results of our survey with our expectations for the installed base of SAP NetWeaver

Business Warehouse to grow 4.5-5.5% annually over the next five years, SAP could

recognize €29 million in 2013 and €315 million in aggregate over the next five years in

software license revenue from SAP HANA underneath new BW deployments. (See Exhibit

12.)

Exhibit 12: Estimated Revenue Contribution based on CIO Survey Data – New

Deployments of SAP Business Warehouse (BW) € in millions, unless otherwise stated

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

NetWeaver BW installations 16,054 16,954 17,886 18,872 19,809 20,743 21,672

% growth y-o-y 5.3% 5.6% 5.5% 5.5% 5.0% 4.7% 4.5%

NetWeaver BW deployments 811 900 932 986 937 934 929

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BW € 101 € 107 € 101 € 101 € 101

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of active installed base migrating to SAP HANA 0.0% 8.8% 29.2% 56.9% 67.5% 75.0% 80.3%

Software revenue 0 9 29 61 68 76 81 315

Support revenue 0 0 3 12 25 39 54 132

Revenue € 0 € 9 € 33 € 72 € 93 € 115 € 134 € 447

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse.

Topic #3: What is the Revenue Opportunity of

Transactional SAP Applications (e.g., SAP Business

Suite and SAP Business One) on SAP HANA?

SAP HANA +2.0 provides the unique ability to deal effectively with both transactional and

analytical workloads, helping not only accelerate data processing but also achieve a

dramatic simplification of the enterprise IT landscape.5 (See Exhibit 13.)

Page 14: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 14

Exhibit 13: Traditional OLTP and Data Warehouse Architecture vs. SAP HANA +2.0

Source: SAP, Credit Suisse.

Following the announcements of SAP Business One, version for SAP HANA in February

2012 (with general availability expected in the second half of 2013) and the announcement

of SAP CRM powered by SAP HANA in November 2012, SAP formally released the SAP

Business Suite powered by SAP HANA on January 10, 2013, unifying analytics and

transactions into a single in-memory platform. Specifically, SAP refactored the SAP

Business Suite application tier to replace calls to a traditional database with calls to the in-

memory HANA database.6 As part of this first wave of Enhancement Packs to Business

Suite, SAP delivers HANA optimizations for 23 business value scenarios across key lines

of business, including finance, sales, marketing, service, procurement, and HR, and more

than 400 reports.

With SAP Business Suite powered by SAP HANA, SAP offers customers the choice to

deploy a fully integrated scenario by replacing the traditional databases running

underneath their SAP Business Suite applications with SAP HANA. (See Exhibit 14.) In

this scenario, customers will no longer need any additional accelerators, since these will

become part of SAP Business Suite powered by SAP HANA.7 As a result, analytics and

operations will access and manipulate operational data in real time, and in-memory

computing would be the basis for executing all transactions and processing complex

analytical data.8

Page 15: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 15

Exhibit 14: HANA +2.0 (a.k.a. “Replace”)—Eliminates the Traditional Database

Source: SAP.

SAP intends to price SAP HANA for SAP Business Suite at 15% of SAP Application Value

(SAV), which is the discounted software license price of any given application from SAP. If

purchasing a corresponding Oracle Database license through SAP, customers would also

pay 15% of the SAP Application Value, as compared with 8% of SAV for SAP Sybase ASE

Enterprise Edition as well as for the SAP OEM editions of IBM DB2 and Microsoft SQL

Server.

Based on this licensing model, in order to determine the potential revenue opportunity for

SAP HANA offered by the installed base of approximately 40,000 customers of SAP

Business Suite and SAP Business One, we attempted to calculate the SAP Application

Value the active installed base of SAP’s applications. To this end, we applied our

estimated annual customer churn rates to SAP’s reported software license revenue (i.e.,

excluding SAP HANA revenue and our assumptions for the contributions from the

acquisitions of Business Object and Sybase) dating back to the release of SAP R/3 in

1992. Summing this 20 years of data, we calculated an active SAP Application Value

installed base of €28.3 billion. Then, to determine the database price, we applied the

appropriate percentage of 15% to the SAP Application Value, which translated into an

estimated the market opportunity for SAP HANA underneath SAP Business Suite and SAP

Business One to equal €4.2 billion. (See Exhibit 15.)

Exhibit 15: Revenue Opportunity for SAP HANA Running under SAP Business Suite and SAP Business One

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Software revenue € 224 € 291 € 555 € 777 € 993 € 1,509 € 1,900 € 1,932 € 2,459 € 2,581 € 2,291 € 2,147 € 2,361 € 2,783 € 3,102 € 3,408 € 3,606 € 2,605 € 3,410 € 4,107 € 4,659

Software revenue -- SAP 202 264 509 715 916 1,397 1,760 1,787 2,276 2,384 2,104 1,960 2,151 2,535 2,827 3,102 2,843 1,960 2,280 2,477 2,657

Software revenue -- SAP HANA 160 390

Software revenue -- BusinessObjects 471 424 593 653 718

Software revenue -- Sybase 288 522 558

Software revenue -- DB reseller 13 17 33 47 60 91 115 117 149 156 137 128 141 166 185 203 186 128 149 186 216

Software revenue -- Other 9 10 12 14 17 21 24 29 35 41 49 58 70 83 91 103 107 93 99 109 120

Annual churn (%) 5.3% 5.4% 5.3% 5.2% 5.1% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.6% 4.7% 6.1% 7.0% 6.9% 4.0% 4.4% 3.7% 1.4% 5.1% 4.7% 2.9% 5.6%

1992 202 192 181 172 163 155 148 141 134 128 120 112 104 100 95 92 91 86 82 79 75

1993 264 250 237 225 214 204 194 185 176 165 154 143 137 131 126 125 118 113 109 103

1994 509 483 458 436 415 395 377 359 337 314 292 280 268 258 254 241 230 223 211

1995 715 679 646 615 586 559 532 500 465 433 415 397 382 377 358 341 331 312

1996 916 872 830 790 753 718 674 627 583 560 535 515 508 482 459 446 421

1997 1,397 1,330 1,266 1,207 1,150 1,080 1,004 935 897 857 825 814 773 736 714 674

1998 1,760 1,676 1,598 1,523 1,430 1,329 1,237 1,187 1,135 1,093 1,077 1,023 974 946 893

1999 1,787 1,704 1,623 1,525 1,417 1,319 1,266 1,210 1,165 1,148 1,090 1,039 1,008 952

2000 2,276 2,168 2,037 1,893 1,762 1,691 1,616 1,556 1,534 1,456 1,387 1,347 1,271

2001 2,384 2,239 2,082 1,937 1,859 1,777 1,711 1,687 1,601 1,526 1,481 1,398

2002 2,104 1,956 1,821 1,747 1,670 1,608 1,585 1,505 1,434 1,391 1,314

2003 1,960 1,825 1,751 1,674 1,611 1,589 1,508 1,437 1,394 1,316

2004 2,151 2,064 1,973 1,899 1,873 1,778 1,694 1,644 1,552

2005 2,535 2,423 2,332 2,299 2,183 2,080 2,018 1,905

2006 2,827 2,721 2,683 2,547 2,426 2,355 2,223

2007 3,102 3,059 2,904 2,766 2,685 2,535

2008 2,843 2,699 2,571 2,495 2,356

2009 1,960 1,867 1,812 1,711

2010 2,280 2,213 2,090

2011 2,477 2,339

2012 2,657

SAP Application Value (active installed base) € 28,307

SAV % for SAP HANA, database edition for SAP BS and SAP BO 15%

Market opportunity for SAP HANA for SAP BS & SAP BO (active installed base) € 4,246

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse.

Page 16: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 16

Topic #4: Are Customers Migrating Transactional

SAP Applications (e.g., SAP Business Suite and SAP

Business One) onto SAP HANA?

In our survey of 90 large enterprise and upper midsized to midsized business customers of

SAP, customers expect to migrate 9.6% and 39.1% of existing deployments of

transactional SAP applications (e.g., SAP Business Suite and SAP Business One) to SAP

HANA by the end of 2013 and the end of 2017, respectively. (See Exhibit 16.) Within the

results, large enterprise expected to migrate existing deployments of transactional SAP

applications at a slower rate—with 6.7% and 20.6% of existing applications expected to be

migrated to SAP HANA in 2013 and 2014, respectively. In comparison, upper midsized to

midsized business customers expect to migrate with 11.3% and 23.9% of existing

applications during these respective timeframes. (See Exhibit 17 and Exhibit 18.)

Exhibit 16: CIO Survey – “What percentage of your existing installed base of

transactional SAP applications do you intend to migrate onto SAP HANA?”

0.2%

9.6%

22.7%

39.1%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2012 2013 2014 2017

Source: Credit Suisse.

Page 17: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 17

Exhibit 17: CIO Survey (Large Enterprises) – “What

percentage of your existing installed base of transactional

SAP applications do you intend to migrate onto SAP

HANA?”

Exhibit 18: CIO Survey (Upper Midsized to Midsized

Businesses) – “What percentage of your existing installed

base of transactional SAP applications do you intend to

migrate onto SAP HANA?”

0.0%

6.7%

20.6%

42.2%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2012 2013 2014 2017

0.4%

11.3%

23.9%

37.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

2012 2013 2014 2017

Source: Credit Suisse. Source: Credit Suisse.

Applying these results (which we weighted 70% for large enterprises and 30% for upper

midsized to midsized businesses) to our estimated market opportunity for SAP HANA

underneath the existing active installed base of transactional SAP applications to equal

€4.2 billion (see Exhibit 15), SAP could recognize incremental software license revenue of

€343 million in 2013 and €1.729 billion in aggregate over the next five years. (See Exhibit

19.) Furthermore, because SAP has long resold databases along with its own applications

(with an estimated attach rate to new applications sales of approximately two-thirds) and

recognized this revenue on a gross basis with licensing fees allocated to cost of goods

sold, by replacing these competing databases with SAP HANA as opposed to competing

some recognized revenue would be cannibalized in terms of ongoing maintenance

revenue that the company currently remits to database partners but cost of goods sold

would also be reduced. Based on this, cost of goods sold would also be reduced by €9

million in 2013 and €221 million in aggregate over the next five years.

Exhibit 19: Estimated Revenue Contribution based on CIO Survey Data – Installed Base

of SAP Applications € in millions, unless otherwise stated

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of active installed base migrating to SAP HANA 0.1% 8.1% 21.6% 30.0% 37.0% 40.7%

Software revenue 5 343 574 356 297 158 1,729

Support revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS 0 21 98 156 142 119 537

Support revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (0) (12) (53) (85) (77) (64) (291)

Support revenue 0 10 45 71 65 54 246

Revenue € 0 € 353 € 619 € 428 € 362 € 212 € 1,974

Cost of goods sold (reduction) (€ 9) (€ 41) (€ 64) (€ 59) (€ 49) (€ 221)

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse.

CIO Responses to “Please discuss the drivers/factors behind the decision to migrate

existing transactional SAP applications onto SAP HANA”:

■ “SAP HANA is very stable and important for our business.”

■ “We plan on eventually migrating all applications onto HANA to achieve cost savings

over our current Oracle environments.”

■ “HANA represents the big data analytics solution for our group. SAP applications will

be migrated based on volumes.”

Page 18: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 18

■ “We have not determined what SAP applications we will be moving to HANA, but it all

depends on the cost of the migration and tools involved as well as how mission critical

we need real time data retrieval. We are looking at business need and functionality as

well.”

■ “Scalability for faster access. Those experiencing current bottlenecks like BW.”

■ “We only have two so it was an easy decision.”

■ “The integration of SAP HANA of the existing SAP applications is more reliable. We

will choose the SAP applications, which support the organization expansion in the

future, to migrate.”

■ “Will complete HANA proof-of-concept in 2013. Targeting applications with large

volume data processing stack.”

■ “Again, the key driver is performance, because higher network availability (as offered

by SAP HANA) negates most issues that are prominent in legacy applications. The

sequence of migration is determined by the resource intensiveness of the specific

application.”

■ “Most importantly speed, and of course cost. Which and when is largely determined by

the regular cycle.”

■ “We will have to see the approach that outsourcers follow with HANA, because I

believe the HANA operation as database should be leveraged by the ITO.”

■ “We are following the release of HANA for SAP ERP applications, but have not

migrated any yet. Performance and a strong desire to move away from Oracle are the

main drivers.”

■ “Load / data size, speed, and performance – primarily in memory analytics first.”

■ “Hopefully in 18 months we will have some applications geared to our type of

industry.”

■ “Performance, real-time, promise of simpler business interactions, customer service,

sales and inventory, BI – main drivers.”

■ “Oracle expense and lack of seamless integration is a driver. Inhibitors include the

difficulty in migrating, migration wizard errors, and staff training.”

■ “Easy licensing and associated cost advantage.”

■ “Systems performance and response time are the immediate drivers. The first

applications will be BW, followed by ERP. If ERP can eliminate BW, that will be an

additional incentive. Costs are expected to be comparable.”

■ “Long-term plan is to migrate away from Oracle where available and appropriate.

HANA is most logical solution at this time and fits within our technology stack and

investment funnel.”

■ “Applications that have huge transactional volume like sales force automation, BI and

analytics, MES, and historian.”

■ “We are evaluating currently migrating the entire SAP application stack to HANA. We

have a number of user interactive, long running jobs that constantly timeout and we

would be reviewing HANA for its speed to increase employee productivity.”

■ “The reasons behind this are where large data environments are driving quicker forms

of retrieval. We have based this decision on the data that our users and internal teams

require to retrieve in the quickest time.”

Page 19: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 19

■ “The decision of moving has already been made; however, the specifics regarding

which applications to be moved and when are still to be made.”

CIO Responses to “Please discuss the drivers/factors behind the decision not to migrate

existing transactional SAP applications onto SAP HANA”:

■ “Not sure there is a need. We don’t do technology for technology sake.”

■ “We are holding all tactical spending static through 2014.”

■ “We still need to make the ROI case to move the data base for the applications.

Included in that ROI is our ability to have the adequate human resource training in

HANA and ability to recruit the required talent externally. These resources are very

expensive and scarce currently.”

■ “Time and cost.”

■ “Cost. Lack of predictive analytics as part of a single vendor BI strategy.”

■ “Mostly due to lack of expertise at the firm or in the market.”

■ “Need more clarity and deployment of the SAP HANA solution.”

■ “As mentioned earlier, we’ve had some difficulties with various SAP implementations

and are hesitant to authorize more significant projects of this nature unless we are

certain that the benefits outweigh the risks. At this time, we are not convinced that

such a value proposition exists.”

■ “Oracle has best performance. Use of Oracle engineered systems. Better integration”

In our survey of 90 large enterprise and upper midsized to midsized business customers of

SAP, customers expect to deploy SAP HANA underneath 14.8% and 23.8% of new

deployments of transactional SAP applications (e.g., SAP Business Suite and SAP

Business One) in 2013 and 2014, respectively. (See Exhibit 20.)

Exhibit 20: CIO Survey – “Of the new transactional applications that you plan to

purchase from SAP during each the following years, what percentage will run on top of

SAP HANA?”

0.0%

14.8%

23.8%

36.6%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

2012 2013 2014 2017

Source: Credit Suisse.

Page 20: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 20

Exhibit 21: CIO Survey (Large Enterprises) – “Of the new

transactional applications that you plan to purchase from

SAP during each the following years, what percentage will

run on top of SAP HANA?”

Exhibit 22: CIO Survey (Upper Midsized to Midsized

Businesses) – “Of the new transactional applications that

you plan to purchase from SAP during each the following

years, what percentage will run on top of SAP HANA?”

0.0%

16.8%

26.3%

44.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2012 2013 2014 2017

0.0%

13.8%

24.4%

38.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

2012 2013 2014 2017

Source: Credit Suisse. Source: Credit Suisse.

Applying these results (which we weighted 70% for large enterprises and 30% for upper

midsized to midsized businesses) to our forward estimates for growth in transactional SAP

applications, SAP could recognize incremental software license revenue of €30 million in

2013 and €315 million in aggregate over the next five years from SAP HANA installed

underneath new deployments of transactional SAP applications (e.g., SAP Business Suite

and SAP Business One). Furthermore, because SAP has long resold databases along

with its own applications, selling SAP HANA as opposed to competing databases over the

next five years would reduce cost of goods sold by €388 million in aggregate but also

cannibalize third-party software license and ongoing maintenance revenue. (See Exhibit

23.)

Exhibit 23: Estimated Revenue Contribution based on CIO Survey Data – New

Deployments of SAP Applications € in millions, unless otherwise stated

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 CAGR

Software revenue (current CS estimates) € 4,659 € 5,120 € 5,811 € 6,037 € 6,315 € 6,647 7.4%

Software revenue -- SAP 2,657 2,736 2,874 3,018 3,168 3,326 4.6%

Software revenue -- SAP HANA 390 685 1,140 1,105 1,118 1,161 24.4%

Software revenue -- BusinessObjects 718 790 869 956 1,051 1,157 10.0%

Software revenue -- Sybase 558 586 603 620 637 652 3.2%

Software revenue -- DB reseller 216 199 194 200 194 194 -2.1%

Software revenue -- Other 120 125 132 139 148 156 5.4%

SAV % for SAP HANA, database edition for SAP BS 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0%

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS (gross) 410 431 453 475 499

Software revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (223) (234) (245) (258) (271)

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS (net) 188 197 207 218 228

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2013-17

% of new sales adopting SAP HANA 15.9% 25.7% 27.9% 36.8% 42.4%

Software revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS 65 111 126 175 212 689

Software revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (35) (60) (69) (95) (115) (374)

Software revenue 30 51 58 80 97 315

Support revenue -- SAP HANA for SAP BS 4 21 45 73 110 252

Support revenue -- DB reseller (cannibalized) (2) (11) (24) (40) (60) (137)

Support revenue 2 9 21 33 50 116

Revenue € 32 € 60 € 78 € 114 € 147 € 431

Cost of goods sold (reduction) (€ 28) (€ 54) (€ 71) (€ 102) (€ 132) (€ 388)

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse.

Page 21: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 21

CIO Responses to “Please discuss the drivers/factors behind the decision to deploy new

SAP applications on SAP HANA”:

■ “SAP HANA is more flexible for the expansion.”

■ “The factors used are cost to deploy these applications on HANA as well as the time

involved to do this and other projects currently going on. We will also be looking at

business need to do this deployment.”

■ “Better speed and scalability as a result of the real-time memory storage.”

■ “The pricing was correct to move forward.”

■ “Large volumes of data analytical processing.”

■ “Performance because all elements reside in one house (i.e., network, database and

apps).”

■ “Same as for replacements; mostly speed and cost.”

■ “We are fully committed to SAP and the drivers were single platform and sharing of

data.”

■ “We will be continuously evaluating to see and justify the value of HANA in our

business for new applications. I suppose that speed and integration will be key factors,

but I will have to see those factors are really worth for us and we can monetize these

argued improvements.”

■ “After a stabilization period, we feel HANA will be a standard DB platform that

customers will adopt quickly. It will enable us to improve performance and continue

expanding our partnership with SAP.”

■ “Speed performance and in-memory analytics.”

■ “We see it as the future and where performance and other dollars will be spent from

SAP.”

■ “Single vendor integration and discount advantages are the drivers. Also, lower staff

expenses by specializing on one vendor’s platform.”

■ “Consistency and scalability with best of uptime.”

■ “Improved systems performance and possible elimination of certain BW query

functionality.”

■ “Currently this is a “best guess” as we have not fully vetted our technology roadmap,

but if HANA performs as advertised it will consume the majority of investment in this

area.”

■ “HANA is in-memory, has many advantages in technology, speed, and flexibility.”

■ “Once we migrate the core SAP applications to HANA, we would set HANA as the

default platform for all new SAP applications.”

■ “The new business applications which will require quick and responsive data retrieval

and delivery back to the user’s request.”

CIO Responses to “Please discuss the drivers/factors behind the decision not to deploy

new SAP applications on SAP HANA”:

■ “Same reason as previously mentioned. The case for the ROI for conversion has not

been made.”

■ “Not good timing right now.”

Page 22: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 22

■ “Due to cost and lack of in-house expertise.”

■ “In order to minimize TCO we follow a strict standardization protocol. To use a mixture

of technologies would go against our operating strategy.”

■ “As mentioned earlier, we’ve not been convinced that SAP HANA adds value. We

would be somewhat open to using it for a brand new application (CRM) but do not see

the wisdom in converting something already installed.”

Topic #5: What about Net New Applications for SAP

HANA?

In addition to SAP Business Suite powered by SAP HANA, the company also unveiled the

new SAP HANA Analytics Foundation for SAP Business Suite, which enables real-time

operational analytics and reporting on live data. This analytics foundation serves as the

basis for a new class of offerings, including SAP Working Capital Analytics, SAP Invoice

and Goods Receipt Reconciliation, SAP Supply Chain Info Center, and SAP Access

Control Role Analytics. The SAP HANA Analytics Foundation is a separate package for

SAP Business Suite.9 By unifying transactional and analytical processing on a single

in-memory platform, business users can now get a unified view of real-time information

within context.10

SAP HANA Analytics Foundation for SAP Business Suite and SAP NetWeaver BW

powered by SAP HANA complement each other. Together, they cover all analytic use

cases on one data source. SAP HANA Analytics Foundation provides operational

reporting and analytics capability directly on the original transactional data, whereas SAP

NetWeaver BW empowers strategic and tactical analytics scenarios with complex logic,

sophisticated key performance indicators (KPIs), and benchmarking.7

SAP will also expand on the in-memory database inside of HANA to provide deeper

integration with the application server in order to build more sophisticated, industry-specific

applications that are designed natively for in-memory, beyond traditional business

intelligence scenarios.11

We expect SAP to develop entirely new applications on the SAP

HANA platform to go beyond the functionality of the core Business Suite. These new

applications will be optimized for data-intensive operations and will intelligently direct

data-heavy workloads entirely to the in-memory computing engine, and the resultant data

will be immediately available for analytics.12

(See Exhibit 24.)

Exhibit 24: SAP Business Suite, SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse, and New

Applications Powered by HANA

Source: SAP.

Page 23: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 23

SAP applications powered by SAP HANA will enable organizations to simulate outcomes,

plan faster, and view business problems more holistically than before. For example,

planning previously required data aggregation from various transactional systems or was

done with spreadsheets containing static data, whereas with SAP HANA, people will be

able to develop and execute business plans in real time, based on dynamic transactional

data being constantly updated by the business.13

We view SAP as the vendor most leveraged the emergence of in-memory “killer apps” that

we believe will be as transformational as client/server applications (e.g., SAP R/3) were in

the 1990s. In fact, SAP has already released multiple net-new applications powered by

HANA that deepen and broaden the company’s footprint. (See Exhibit 25.)

Exhibit 25: SAP HANA Architectures and Applications

Source: http://www.saphana.com/docs/DOC-2272.

Page 24: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 24

Valuation SAP currently trades at a next-twelve-months (NTM) enterprise value to unlevered free

cash flow multiple of 15.8, which represents a discount to the company’s 10-year average

multiple of approximately 20.4, and a slight premium to the 5-year average of 14.7. (See

Exhibit 26 and Exhibit 27.)

Exhibit 26: SAP NTM EV/UFCF Multiple, 10-Year Trend € in millions, unless otherwise stated

$-

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

$90

0.0x

5.0x

10.0x

15.0x

20.0x

25.0x

30.0x

35.0x

40.0x

45.0x

Mar-03 Jan-04 Nov-04 Sep-05 Jul-06 May-07 Mar-08 Jan-09 Nov-09 Sep-10 Jul-11 May-12

Average: EV/FCF NTM 20.4x Standard Deviation: + / - 7.4x EV/FCF NTM Price

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

Exhibit 27: SAP NTM EV/UFCF Multiple, 5-Year Trend € in millions, unless otherwise stated

$-

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

$90

0.0x

5.0x

10.0x

15.0x

20.0x

25.0x

Mar-08 Jan-09 Nov-09 Sep-10 Jul-11 May-12

Average: EV/FCF NTM 14.7x Standard Deviation: + / - 2.5x EV/FCF NTM Price

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

Page 25: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 25

SAP also currently trades at a NTM price to earnings multiple of 16.1, a significant

discount to the stock’s 10-year average multiple of 21.1 and the 5-year average of 15.5.

(See Exhibit 28 and Exhibit 29.)

Exhibit 28: SAP NTM P/E Multiple, 10-Year Trend € in millions, unless otherwise stated

$-

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

$90

0.0x

5.0x

10.0x

15.0x

20.0x

25.0x

30.0x

Mar-08 Jan-09 Nov-09 Sep-10 Jul-11 May-12

Average: P/E NTM 21.1x Standard Deviation: + / - 6.4x P/E NTM Price

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

Exhibit 29: SAP NTM P/E Multiple, 5-Year Trend € in millions, unless otherwise stated

$-

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

$80

$90

0.0x

5.0x

10.0x

15.0x

20.0x

25.0x

Mar-08 Jan-09 Nov-09 Sep-10 Jul-11 May-12

Average: P/E NTM 15.5x Standard Deviation: + / - 1.8x P/E NTM Price

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

SAP currently trades at a 13.9% discount to the software industry on a NTM price to

earnings multiple basis compared to SAP’s relative discount to the software industry of

9.9% on average over the past five years. Additionally, SAP currently trades at a 17.5%

premium to the S&P 500 on a NTM price to earnings multiple basis compared to SAP’s

relative premium to the S&P 500 of 17.4% on average over the past five years. SAP also

trades at a 45.6% premium to Oracle on a NTM price to earnings multiple basis, as

compared with SAP’s premium to Oracle of 27.2% on average over the past five years.

One standard deviation below this average equals a premium of 11.4%. (See Exhibit 30,

Exhibit 31, and Exhibit 32.)

Page 26: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 26

Exhibit 30: SAP NTM P/E Multiple Discount/Premium to Oracle, 5-Year Trend

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

Mar-08 Jan-09 Nov-09 Sep-10 Jul-11 May-12

SAP P/E NTM Discount/Premium to Oracle Corp. Average: Premium/Discount : 27.2% Standard Deviation: + / - 15.8%

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

Exhibit 31: SAP NTM P/E Multiple Discount/Premium to Software Industry, 5-Year Trend

-40.0%

-30.0%

-20.0%

-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

Mar-08 Jan-09 Nov-09 Sep-10 Jul-11 May-12

SAP P/E NTM Discount/Premium to Sector average Average: Premium/Discount : -9.9% Standard Deviation: + / - 14.8%

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

Exhibit 32: SAP NTM P/E Multiple Discount/Premium to S&P 500, 5-Year Trend

-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Mar-08 Jan-09 Nov-09 Sep-10 Jul-11 May-12

SAP P/E NTM Discount/Premium to S&P 500 Average: Premium/Discount : 17.4% Standard Deviation: + / - 13.0%

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

Page 27: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 27

Our price target of €70 represents a NTM P/E multiple of 19.1x and NTM EV/UFCF

multiple of 18.6x. (See Exhibit 33.)

Exhibit 33: Valuation Matrix € in millions, unless otherwise stated

Revenue € 16,304.0 € 17,998.2 € 20,002.4 € 18,339.8

Support Rev. € 8,244.0 € 8,953.0 € 9,852.8 € 9,167.5

EPS (Pro Forma) € 3.03 € 3.57 € 4.14 € 3.66

CFO € 3,608.8 € 4,896.5 € 5,513.1 € 5,052.7

FCF € 3,065.8 € 4,329.5 € 4,874.4 € 4,475.7

UFCF € 3,240.8 € 4,397.8 € 4,943.8 € 4,535.4

EV/R 4.4x 4.0x 3.6x 3.9x

EV/Support Rev. 8.8x 8.1x 7.3x 7.9x

P/E (Pro Forma) 19.7x 16.7x 14.4x 16.3x

EV/CFO 20.0x 14.7x 13.1x 14.3x

EV/FCF 23.5x 16.7x 14.8x 16.1x

EV/UFCF 22.3x 16.4x 14.6x 15.9x

EV/R 5.2x 4.7x 4.2x 4.6x

EV/Support Rev. 10.2x 9.4x 8.6x 9.2x

P/E (Pro Forma) 23.1x 19.6x 16.9x 19.1x

EV/CFO 23.4x 17.2x 15.3x 16.7x

EV/FCF 27.5x 19.5x 17.3x 18.8x

EV/UFCF 26.0x 19.2x 17.1x 18.6x

2012 NTM

Es

tim

ate

sC

urr

en

tT

arg

et

2013E 2014E

Source: FactSet, Credit Suisse.

Page 28: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 28

Estimates Exhibit 34: Credit Suisse (New vs. Previous) vs. Consensus – March Quarter € in millions, unless otherwise stated Quarterly Variance Analysis

New CS Prev CS Actual Consensus

Mar-13E Mar-13E € D % D Mar-13E Mar-13E € D % D

Software 730 822 (92) -11.2% 730 712 18 2.5%

Support 2,147 2,147 - 0.0% 2,147 2,162 (15) -0.7%

Cloud subscriptions and support 167 167 - 0.0% 167 164 3 2.0%

Software and software-related service 3,044 3,136 (92) -2.9% 3,044 3,037 7 0.2%

Professional services and other 748 787 (40) -5.0% 748 769 (21) -2.8%

Revenue € 3,792 € 3,923 (131) -3.3% € 3,792 € 3,806 (€14) -0.4%

Cost of goods sold 1,128 1,162 (33) -2.9% 1,128 1,185 (57) -4.8%

Gross profit 2,664 2,762 (98) -3.5% 2,664 2,621 43 1.6%

Gross margin 70.2% 70.4% 70.2% 68.9%

Operating expenses 1,677 1,689 (12) -0.7% 1,677 1,625 52 3.2%

Operating income 987 1,073 (86) -8.0% 987 996 (9) -0.9%

Operating margin 26.0% 27.3% 26.0% 26.2%

Interest and other, net (46) (46) - 0.0% (46) (8) (38) 461.2%

Pro forma pretax income 941 1,027 (86) -8.4% 941 988 (47) -4.7%

Effective tax rate 27.5% 27.5% 0.0% 27.5% 26.0%

Net income 682 745 (63) -8.4% 682 731 (49) -6.7%

EPS € 0.58 € 0.63 (€0.05) -8.3% € 0.58 € 0.58 (€0.00) -0.7%

FD shares outstanding 1,193 1,193 - 0.0% 1,193 1,197 (4) -0.4%

OCF 2,294 2,305 (11) -0.5% 2,294 1,259 1,034 82.1%

Deferred Revenue 3,639 3,659 (20) -0.5% 3,639 NA NM NM

Capital spending 124 128 (4) -3.3% 124 240 (116) -48.4% Source: Company data, FactSet, Vara Research GmbH, Credit Suisse.

Exhibit 35: Credit Suisse (New vs. Previous) vs. Consensus – 2013 € in millions, unless otherwise stated Annual Estimates Variance Analysis

New CS Prev CS New CS Consensus

2013E 2013E € D % D 2013E 2013E € D % D

Software 5,120 5,060 60 1.2% 5,120 5,097 23 0.4%

Support 8,953 8,960 (7) -0.1% 8,953 9,004 (51) -0.6%

Cloud subscriptions and support 745 745 - 0.0% 745 748 (3) -0.4%

Software and software-related service 14,818 14,765 53 0.4% 14,818 14,850 (32) -0.2%

Professional services and other 3,180 3,136 44 1.4% 3,180 3,222 (42) -1.3%

Revenue € 17,998 € 17,901 €97 0.5% € 17,998 € 18,072 (€74) -0.4%

Cost of goods sold 4,851 4,821 30 0.6% 4,851 5,058 (207) -4.1%

Gross profit 13,147 13,080 67 0.5% 13,147 13,014 133 1.0%

Gross margin 73.0% 73.1% 73.0% 72.0%

Operating expenses 7,195 7,232 (38) -0.5% 7,195 7,063 132 1.9%

Operating income 5,952 5,847 105 1.8% 5,952 5,951 1 0.0%

Operating margin 33.1% 32.7% 33.1% 32.9%

Interest and other, net (94) (96) 2 -1.8% (94) 170 (264) -155.4%

Pro forma pretax income 5,858 5,752 107 1.9% 5,858 5,951 (93) -1.6%

Effective tax rate 27.5% 27.5% 0 0.0% 27.5% 27.0%

Net income 4,247 4,170 77 1.9% 4,247 4,342 (95) -2.2%

EPS € 3.57 € 3.51 €0.06 1.9% € 3.57 € 3.54 €0.03 0.9%

FD shares outstanding 1,191 1,191 - 0.0% 1,191 1,227 (36) -2.9%

OCF 4,896 4,848 48 1.0% 4,896 4,825 71 1.5%

Deferred Revenue 1,704 1,698 6 0.3% 1,704 NA NM NM

Capital spending 567 564 3 0.5% 567 556 10 1.9% Source: Company data, FactSet, Vara Research GmbH, Credit Suisse.

Page 29: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 29

Exhibit 36: Credit Suisse (New vs. Previous) vs. Consensus – 2014 € in millions, unless otherwise stated Annual Estimates Variance Analysis

New CS Prev CS New CS Consensus

2014E 2014E € D % D 2014E 2014E € D % D

Software 5,811 5,600 211 3.8% 5,811 5,605 206 3.7%

Support 9,853 9,839 14 0.1% 9,853 9,843 10 0.1%

Cloud subscriptions and support 944 944 - 0.0% 944 999 (55) -5.5%

Software and software-related service 16,608 16,383 225 1.4% 16,608 16,541 67 0.4%

Professional services and other 3,395 3,280 115 3.5% 3,395 3,298 97 2.9%

Revenue € 20,002 € 19,662 €340 1.7% € 20,002 € 19,839 €163 0.8%

Cost of goods sold 5,264 5,187 78 1.5% 5,264 5,405 (141) -2.6%

Gross profit 14,738 14,475 263 1.8% 14,738 14,434 304 2.1%

Gross margin 73.7% 73.6% 73.7% 72.8%

Operating expenses 7,871 7,777 93 1.2% 7,871 7,668 203 2.6%

Operating income 6,867 6,698 169 2.5% 6,867 6,766 101 1.5%

Operating margin 34.3% 34.1% 34.3% 34.1%

Operating income 34.3% 34.1% 34.3% 34.1%

Restructuring - - - NM - - - NM

Interest and other, net (96) (102) 6 NM (96) 215 (311) -144.6%

Pro forma pretax income 6,772 6,596 176 2.7% 6,772 6,766 6 0.1%

Effective tax rate 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5%

Net income 4,910 4,782 127 2.7% 4,910 4,906 3 0.1%

EPS € 4.14 € 4.03 €0.11 2.7% € 4.14 € 4.05 €0.09 2.1%

FD shares outstanding 1,187 1,187 - 0.0% 1,187 1,211 (25) -2.0%

OCF 5,513 5,410 103 1.9% 5,513 5,536 (23) -0.4%

Deferred Revenue 2,018 1,996 22 1.1% 2,018 NA NM NM

Capital spending 639 628 11 1.7% 639 613 26 4.3% Source: Company data, FactSet, Vara Research GmbH, Credit Suisse.

Page 30: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 30

Exhibit 37: Historical and Projected Income Statement € in millions, unless otherwise stated

Fiscal 2011 by Quarter Fiscal 2012 by Quarter Fiscal 2013 by Quarter

Mar-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 Mar-13E Jun-13E Sep-13E Dec-13E 2011 2012 2013E 2014E

Total revenue € 3,041 € 3,308 € 3,410 € 4,500 € 3,357 € 3,916 € 3,970 € 5,061 € 3,792 € 4,281 € 4,329 € 5,596 € 14,259 € 16,304 € 17,998 € 20,002

Software and software-related service 2,344 2,587 2,692 3,722 2,626 3,142 3,212 4,266 3,044 3,498 3,545 4,730 11,345 13,246 14,818 16,608

% of revenue 77.1% 78.2% 78.9% 82.7% 78.2% 80.2% 80.9% 84.3% 80.3% 81.7% 81.9% 84.5% 79.6% 81.2% 82.3% 83.0%

Software revenue 615 838 875 1,779 637 1,059 1,026 1,937 730 1,123 1,089 2,177 4,107 4,659 5,120 5,811

% of revenue 20.2% 25.3% 25.7% 39.5% 19.0% 27.0% 25.8% 38.3% 19.3% 26.2% 25.2% 38.9% 28.8% 28.6% 28.4% 29.1%

Support revenue 1,725 1,745 1,813 1,937 1,954 2,014 2,106 2,170 2,147 2,195 2,264 2,347 7,220 8,244 8,953 9,853

% of revenue 56.7% 52.8% 53.2% 43.0% 58.2% 51.4% 53.0% 42.9% 56.6% 51.3% 52.3% 41.9% 50.6% 50.6% 49.7% 49.3%

Cloud subscriptions and support 4 4 4 6 35 69 80 159 167 180 192 206 18 343 745 944

% of revenue 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1.0% 1.8% 2.0% 3.1% 4.4% 4.2% 4.4% 3.7% 0.1% 2.1% 4.1% 4.7%

Professional services and other 697 721 718 778 731 774 758 795 748 783 784 866 2,914 3,058 3,180 3,395

% of revenue 22.9% 21.8% 21.1% 17.3% 21.8% 19.8% 19.1% 15.7% 19.7% 18.3% 18.1% 15.5% 20.4% 18.8% 17.7% 17.0%

Consulting 570 579 578 615 597 617 616 612 613 630 636 671 2,342 2,442 2,550 2,728

% of revenue 18.7% 17.5% 17.0% 13.7% 17.8% 15.8% 15.5% 12.1% 16.2% 14.7% 14.7% 12.0% 16.4% 15.0% 14.2% 13.6%

Other services revenue 127 142 140 163 134 157 142 183 134 153 148 195 572 616 630 667

% of revenue 4.2% 4.3% 4.1% 3.6% 4.0% 4.0% 3.6% 3.6% 3.5% 3.6% 3.4% 3.5% 4.0% 3.8% 3.5% 3.3%

Cost of software and software-related service 418 426 443 538 467 491 532 648 526 553 565 720 1,825 2,138 2,363 2,605

% of software and software-related service 17.8% 16.5% 16.5% 14.5% 17.8% 15.6% 16.6% 15.2% 17.3% 15.8% 15.9% 15.2% 16.1% 16.1% 15.9% 15.7%

Cost of professional services and other 564 547 534 555 594 610 576 605 603 630 608 648 2,200 2,385 2,488 2,660

% of professional services and other revenue 80.1% 75.1% 73.7% 70.7% 80.5% 78.1% 75.3% 75.4% 79.8% 79.7% 76.9% 74.3% 74.8% 77.3% 77.6% 77.7%

Cost of revenue 982 973 977 1,093 1,061 1,101 1,108 1,253 1,128 1,182 1,172 1,368 4,025 4,523 4,851 5,264

Gross profit 2,059 2,335 2,433 3,407 2,296 2,815 2,862 3,808 2,664 3,099 3,156 4,228 10,234 11,781 13,147 14,738

Gross margin 67.7% 70.6% 71.3% 75.7% 68.4% 71.9% 72.1% 75.2% 70.2% 72.4% 72.9% 75.6% 71.8% 72.3% 73.0% 73.7%

Operating expenses:

Sales and marketing 639 704 702 908 776 916 917 1,075 922 1,013 968 1,136 2,953 3,684 4,039 4,481

% of revenue 21.0% 21.3% 20.6% 20.2% 23.1% 23.4% 23.1% 21.2% 24.3% 23.7% 22.4% 20.3% 20.7% 22.6% 22.4% 22.4%

Research and development 475 450 440 532 500 523 518 583 561 579 578 626 1,897 2,124 2,344 2,554

% of revenue 15.6% 13.6% 12.9% 11.8% 14.9% 13.4% 13.0% 11.5% 14.8% 13.5% 13.4% 11.2% 13.3% 13.0% 13.0% 12.8%

General and administrative 165 164 163 196 185 206 188 205 194 205 195 218 688 784 812 835

% of revenue 5.4% 5.0% 4.8% 4.4% 5.5% 5.3% 4.7% 4.1% 5.1% 4.8% 4.5% 3.9% 4.8% 4.8% 4.5% 4.2%2,262.0 2,289.0 2,279.0 2,718.0 2,523.0 2,743.0 2,731.0 3,096.0 2,805.3 2,979.6 2,913.5 3,347.4 9,548 11,093 12,046 13,135

Other operating expense (income) 1 (2) (3) (11) 1 (3) - (20) - - - - (15) (22) - -

% of revenue 0.0% NM NM NM 0.0% NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total operating expenses 1,280 1,316 1,302 1,625 1,462 1,642 1,623 1,843 1,677 1,797 1,741 1,979 5,523 6,570 7,195 7,871

Operating income 779 1,019 1,131 1,782 834 1,173 1,239 1,965 987 1,302 1,415 2,249 4,711 5,211 5,952 6,867

Operating margin 25.6% 30.8% 33.2% 39.6% 24.8% 30.0% 31.2% 38.8% 26.0% 30.4% 32.7% 40.2% 33.0% 32.0% 33.1% 34.3%

Operating margin -- inc. restructuring 25.6% 30.8% 33.2% 39.6% 24.8% 29.9% 31.1% 38.8% 25.7% 30.2% 32.6% 40.2% 33.0% 31.9% 32.9% 34.3%

Restructuring charge - 1 - - - 4 4 - 13 10 5 - 1 8 28 -

% of revenue NM 0.0% NM NM NM 0.1% 0.1% NM 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% NM 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% NM

Stock options expense 52 32 (17) 118 203 98 152 185 100 98 152 185 185 638 535 208

% of revenue 1.7% 1.0% NM 2.6% 6.0% 2.5% 3.8% 3.7% 2.6% 2.3% 3.5% 3.3% 1.3% 3.9% 3.0% 1.0%

Interest and other, net (14) (53) (9) (48) (23) (56) (99) (63) (46) (24) (2) (22) (124) (241) (94) (96)

Pretax income 765 966 1,122 1,734 811 1,117 1,140 1,902 941 1,278 1,413 2,226 4,587 4,970 5,858 6,772

Pro forma taxes 237 263 261 452 228 286 304 542 259 351 389 612 1,213 1,360 1,611 1,862

Effective tax rate 31.0% 27.2% 23.3% 26.1% 28.1% 25.6% 26.7% 28.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 27.5% 26.4% 27.4% 27.5% 27.5%

Pro forma net income € 528 € 703 € 861 € 1,282 € 583 € 831 € 836 € 1,360 € 682 € 926 € 1,025 € 1,614 € 3,374 € 3,610 € 4,247 € 4,910

Pro forma net margin 17.4% 21.3% 25.2% 28.5% 17.4% 21.2% 21.1% 26.9% 18.0% 21.6% 23.7% 28.8% 23.7% 22.1% 23.6% 24.5%

Pro forma EPS (fully-diluted) -- continued ops €0.44 €0.59 €0.72 €1.08 €0.49 €0.70 €0.70 €1.14 €0.58 €0.78 €0.86 €1.36 €2.84 €3.03 €3.57 €4.14

Pro forma EPS (fully-diluted) -- inc. restructuring €0.44 €0.59 €0.72 €1.08 €0.49 €0.69 €0.70 €1.14 €0.57 €0.77 €0.86 €1.36 €2.84 €3.02 €3.55 €4.14

FD shares outstanding 1,189 1,189 1,190 1,190 1,191 1,192 1,193 1,194 1,193 1,191 1,190 1,189 1,190 1,193 1,191 1,187

Fiscal Year Ends December

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates.

Page 31: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 31

Exhibit 38: Historical and Projected Income Statement Growth Analysis Fiscal 2011 by Quarter Fiscal 2012 by Quarter Fiscal 2013 by Quarter

Mar-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 Mar-13E Jun-13E Sep-13E Dec-13E 2011 2012 2013E 2014E

Sequential growth

Revenue -25.8% 8.8% 3.1% 32.0% -25.4% 16.7% 1.4% 27.5% -25.1% 12.9% 1.1% 29.3% 14.7% 14.3% 10.4% 11.1%

Software and software-related service -29.2% 10.4% 4.1% 38.3% -29.4% 19.6% 2.2% 32.8% -28.6% 14.9% 1.3% 33.4% 16.3% 16.8% 11.9% 12.1%

Software revenue -60.2% 36.3% 4.4% 103.3% -64.2% 66.2% -3.1% 88.8% -62.3% 53.8% -3.0% 99.8% 20.4% 13.4% 9.9% 13.5%

Support revenue -2.0% 1.2% 3.9% 6.8% 0.9% 3.1% 4.6% 3.0% -1.1% 2.2% 3.1% 3.7% 14.0% 14.2% 8.6% 10.0%

Cloud subscriptions and support 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 483.3% 97.1% 15.9% 98.8% 5.2% 7.7% 6.7% 7.0% 28.6% 1805.6% 117.3% 26.7%

Software and cloud subscription -60.1% 36.0% 4.4% 103.1% -62.4% 67.9% -2.0% 89.5% -57.2% 45.2% -1.7% 85.9% 20.5% 21.3% 17.3% 15.2%

Professional services and other -11.2% 3.4% -0.4% 8.4% -6.0% 5.9% -2.1% 4.9% -6.0% 4.7% 0.1% 10.5% 9.1% 4.9% 4.0% 6.7%

Consulting -8.8% 1.6% -0.2% 6.4% -2.9% 3.4% -0.2% -0.6% 0.2% 2.7% 1.0% 5.6% 6.6% 4.3% 4.4% 7.0%

Other services revenue -20.6% 11.8% -1.4% 16.4% -17.8% 17.2% -9.6% 28.9% -26.6% 14.2% -3.7% 31.9% 20.9% 7.7% 2.3% 5.8%

Cost of software and software-related service -12.4% 1.9% 4.0% 21.4% -13.2% 5.1% 8.4% 21.8% -18.9% 5.1% 2.2% 27.4% 12.4% 17.2% 10.5% 10.2%

Cost of professional services and other -4.1% -3.0% -2.4% 3.9% 7.0% 2.7% -5.6% 5.0% -0.4% 4.5% -3.5% 6.7% 6.7% 8.4% 4.3% 6.9%

Gross profit -32.1% 13.4% 4.2% 40.0% -32.6% 22.6% 1.7% 33.1% -30.0% 16.3% 1.9% 34.0% 17.0% 15.1% 11.6% 12.1%

Sales and marketing -15.3% 10.2% -0.3% 29.3% -14.5% 18.0% 0.1% 17.2% -14.2% 9.9% -4.5% 17.4% 16.0% 24.8% 9.6% 10.9%

Research and development -2.5% -5.3% -2.2% 20.9% -6.0% 4.6% -1.0% 12.5% -3.8% 3.2% -0.1% 8.2% 10.9% 12.0% 10.3% 9.0%

General and administrative -2.9% -0.6% -0.6% 20.2% -5.6% 11.4% -8.7% 9.0% -5.3% 5.5% -4.8% 11.7% 14.6% 14.0% 3.5% 2.9%

Total operating expenses -9.2% 2.8% -1.1% 24.8% -10.0% 12.3% -1.2% 13.6% -9.0% 7.2% -3.1% 13.7% 13.9% 19.0% 9.5% 9.4%

Operating income -52.0% 30.8% 11.0% 57.6% -53.2% 40.6% 5.6% 58.6% -49.8% 31.9% 8.7% 58.9% 20.9% 10.6% 14.2% 15.4%

Pro forma pretax income -50.0% 26.3% 16.1% 54.5% -53.2% 37.7% 2.1% 66.8% -50.5% 35.8% 10.6% 57.5% 25.7% 8.3% 17.9% 15.6%

Pro forma net income -52.4% 33.1% 22.5% 48.9% -54.5% 42.5% 0.6% 62.7% -49.8% 35.8% 10.6% 57.5% 28.5% 7.0% 17.7% 15.6%

Pro forma EPS (fully-diluted) -- continued ops -52.4% 33.1% 22.4% 48.9% -54.6% 42.4% 0.5% 62.5% -49.4% 35.0% 10.7% 57.7% 28.4% 6.7% 17.9% 15.8%

Pro forma EPS (fully-diluted) -- inc. restructuring -52.4% 33.0% 22.5% 48.9% -54.6% 41.9% 0.5% 63.1% -50.1% 35.7% 11.2% 58.2% 30.1% 6.6% 17.6% 16.4%

Year-over-year growth

Revenue 23.9% 16.5% 12.2% 9.9% 10.4% 18.4% 16.4% 12.5% 13.0% 9.3% 9.0% 10.6%

Software and software-related service 23.9% 17.4% 14.5% 12.4% 12.0% 21.5% 19.3% 14.6% 15.9% 11.3% 10.4% 10.9%

Software revenue 24.2% 24.1% 26.1% 15.1% 3.6% 26.4% 17.3% 8.9% 14.6% 6.1% 6.2% 12.4%

Support revenue 23.7% 14.4% 9.6% 10.0% 13.3% 15.4% 16.2% 12.0% 9.9% 9.0% 7.5% 8.2%

Cloud subscriptions and support 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 50.0% 775.0% 1625.0% 1900.0% 2550.0% 377.8% 161.1% 140.3% 29.3%

Software and cloud subscription 24.3% 24.2% 25.9% 15.2% 8.6% 34.0% 25.8% 17.4% 33.5% 15.5% 15.9% 13.7%

Professional services and other 24.0% 13.4% 4.5% -0.9% 4.9% 7.4% 5.6% 2.2% 2.3% 1.2% 3.4% 8.9%

Consulting 19.0% 9.7% 2.3% -1.6% 4.7% 6.6% 6.6% -0.5% 2.7% 2.0% 3.2% 9.7%

Other services revenue 53.0% 31.5% 14.8% 1.9% 5.5% 10.6% 1.4% 12.3% 0.2% -2.3% 4.0% 6.5%

Cost of software and software-related service 16.4% 13.9% 7.0% 12.8% 11.7% 15.3% 20.1% 20.4% 12.6% 12.6% 6.2% 11.1%

Cost of professional services and other 25.3% 10.3% 1.3% -5.6% 5.3% 11.5% 7.9% 9.0% 1.4% 3.2% 5.5% 7.2%

Gross profit 25.2% 18.5% 16.0% 12.4% 11.5% 20.6% 17.6% 11.8% 16.0% 10.1% 10.3% 11.0%

Sales and marketing 19.5% 10.0% 13.6% 20.4% 21.4% 30.1% 30.6% 18.4% 18.8% 10.6% 5.5% 5.7%

Research and development 25.3% 14.8% -2.7% 9.2% 5.3% 16.2% 17.7% 9.6% 12.1% 10.7% 11.6% 7.3%

General and administrative 22.1% 14.6% 7.2% 15.3% 12.1% 25.6% 15.3% 4.6% 4.9% -0.5% 3.7% 6.2%

Total operating expenses 21.7% 12.2% 7.2% 15.3% 14.2% 24.8% 24.7% 13.4% 14.7% 9.4% 7.3% 7.4%

Operating income 31.4% 27.9% 28.1% 9.9% 7.1% 15.1% 9.5% 10.3% 18.3% 11.0% 14.2% 14.4%

Pro forma pretax income 35.9% 36.1% 32.3% 13.4% 6.0% 15.6% 1.6% 9.7% 16.0% 14.4% 24.0% 17.1%

Pro forma net income 29.8% 39.2% 42.3% 15.6% 10.4% 18.2% -2.9% 6.1% 17.0% 11.5% 22.6% 18.7%

Pro forma EPS (fully-diluted) -- continued ops 29.9% 39.2% 42.1% 15.4% 10.2% 17.9% -3.1% 5.7% 17.7% 11.5% 22.8% 19.2%

Pro forma EPS (fully-diluted) -- inc. restructuring 34.2% 37.3% 42.2% 15.4% 10.2% 17.6% -3.5% 5.7% 16.2% 11.1% 22.8% 19.2%

Fiscal Year Ends December

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates.

Page 32: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 32

Exhibit 39: Historical and Projected Balance Sheet € in millions, unless otherwise stated

Fiscal 2011 by Quarter Fiscal 2012 by Quarter Fiscal 2013 by Quarter

Mar-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 Mar-13E Jun-13E Sep-13E Dec-13E 2011 2012 2013E 2014E

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents 4,477 4,563 5,061 5,781 5,301 3,750 4,107 2,629 4,702 3,890 4,748 5,292 5,781 2,629 5,292 8,574

Accounts receivables, net 3,214 2,738 2,530 3,494 3,442 3,185 2,962 3,915 3,955 3,531 3,242 4,340 3,494 3,915 4,340 4,836

Other assets 462 250 224 205 275 371 354 332 311 406 386 367 205 332 367 410

Deferred income taxes 135 129 157 214 175 230 233 157 157 157 157 157 214 157 157 157

Prepaid expenses/deferred charges - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Assets held for disposal - - 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total current assets 8,288 7,680 8,000 9,694 9,193 7,536 7,656 7,033 9,125 7,983 8,533 10,156 9,694 7,033 10,156 13,976

Long-term investments

Goodwill, intangible assets, net 10,482 10,320 10,522 10,733 13,444 13,852 13,542 16,508 16,508 16,508 16,508 16,508 10,733 16,508 16,508 16,508

Property and equipment, net of depreciation 1,443 1,463 1,497 1,551 1,576 1,656 1,632 1,710 1,691 1,672 1,645 1,655 1,551 1,710 1,655 1,650

Investments 446 480 541 538 649 651 596 633 633 633 633 633 538 633 633 633

Accounts receivables, net 75 78 72 84 88 86 88 88 89 79 73 98 84 88 98 109

Other assets 30 36 36 39 51 50 53 70 58 55 58 77 39 70 77 86

Deferred income taxes 722 714 440 466 480 500 600 655 655 655 655 655 466 655 655 655

Prepaid expenses/deferred charges 124 125 131 146 152 157 165 173 173 173 173 173 146 173 173 173

Total assets 21,610 20,896 21,239 23,251 25,633 24,488 24,332 26,870 28,931 27,758 28,277 29,955 23,251 26,870 29,955 33,790

Current liabilities

Accounts payable 794 783 809 979 856 899 835 911 964 977 922 1,007 979 911 1,007 1,124

Income tax obligations 77 108 128 379 338 303 417 552 552 552 552 552 379 552 552 552

Other current liabilities 1,270 1,249 1,502 3,325 2,951 2,709 3,288 2,909 1,908 1,999 2,234 2,906 3,325 2,909 2,906 2,356

Provisions 1,298 1,287 542 546 608 692 831 933 933 933 933 933 546 933 933 933

Deferred income taxes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Deferred income 2,773 2,161 1,536 1,048 3,389 2,862 2,032 1,383 3,575 3,132 2,386 1,640 1,048 1,383 1,640 1,954

Liabilities associated with assets held for disposal - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total current liabilities 6,212 5,588 4,527 6,277 8,142 7,465 7,403 6,688 7,932 7,593 7,027 7,038 6,277 6,688 7,038 6,918

Long-term liabilities

Accounts payable 43 37 46 43 40 39 52 45 48 48 46 50 43 45 50 56

Income tax obligations 403 418 437 410 432 424 425 391 391 391 391 391 410 391 391 391

Debt 3,906 3,945 4,007 2,925 2,893 2,754 2,119 4,445 4,503 3,731 3,731 3,731 2,925 4,445 3,731 3,636

Provisions 247 244 239 273 369 311 312 393 393 393 393 393 273 393 393 393

Deferred income taxes 562 513 499 477 573 565 561 572 572 572 572 572 477 572 572 572

Deferred income 57 64 60 44 38 49 49 64 64 64 64 64 44 64 64 64

Minority interests 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 8 10 8 8 8

Other liabilities 91 80 75 81 99 98 102 98 98 98 98 98 81 98 98 98

Total liabilities 11,531 10,899 9,900 10,540 12,595 11,714 11,032 12,704 14,008 12,898 12,329 12,345 10,540 12,704 12,345 12,136

Total shareholders' equity 10,079 9,997 11,339 12,711 13,038 12,774 13,300 14,166 14,923 14,860 15,948 17,610 12,711 14,166 17,610 21,654

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity 21,610 20,896 21,239 23,251 25,633 24,488 24,332 26,870 28,931 27,758 28,277 29,955 23,251 26,870 29,955 33,790

Fiscal Year Ends December

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates.

Page 33: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 33

Exhibit 40: Historical and Projected Cash Flow Statement € in millions, unless otherwise stated

Fiscal 2012 by Quarter Fiscal 2013 by Quarter

Mar-11 Jun-11 Sep-11 Dec-11 Mar-12 Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 Mar-13E Jun-13E Sep-13E Dec-13E 2011 2012 2013E 2014E

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income (loss) 403 588 1,251 1,200 444 661 614 1,064 613 866 930 1,511 3,442 2,783 3,919 4,857

Net loss from discontinued operations - - - - - - - - 5 - - - - - 5 -

Minority interests - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Income from continuing ops. before minority interest 403 588 1,251 1,200 444 661 614 1,064 618 866 930 1,511 3,442 2,783 3,924 4,857

Depreciation and amortization 178 179 179 188 192 210 220 241 143 152 160 167 724 863 622 643

Losses from equity investees - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Losses on disposal of intangible assets and PP&E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Gains on disposal of financial assets 14 18 (30) 35 16 10 7 35 - - - - 37 68 - -

Writeups/downs of financial assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Allowance for doubtful accounts 21 (13) (8) (18) 28 (2) (8) (42) (9) (35) (8) (40) (18) (24) (92) (102)

Other (217) (182) 387 (164) (308) (347) 607 14 - - - - (176) (34) - -

Impacts of hedging for cash-settled share-based payment plans - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stock-based compensation - - - - - - - - 100 98 152 185 - - 535 208

Deferred income taxes 180 216 (96) 90 163 205 (613) 207 - - - - 390 (38) - -

Amortization of intangibles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Changes to assets and liabilities 1,013 (130) (985) (520) 1,536 (431) (151) (963) 1,442 (169) (257) (1,108) (622) (9) (92) (94)

Accounts receivable (233) 482 224 (901) 36 326 226 (885) (41) 434 296 (1,124) (428) (297) (435) (507)

Change in other assets (105) 32 15 75 (89) (45) 25 37 34 (92) 16 (1) 17 (72) (43) (51)

Change in accrued and other liabilities (593) (53) (538) 849 (688) (64) 407 552 (742) (69) 177 762 (335) 207 128 150

Deferred revenue 1,944 (591) (686) (543) 2,277 (648) (809) (667) 2,192 (443) (746) (746) 124 153 257 314

Net cash provided by operating activities 1,592 676 698 811 2,071 306 676 556 2,294 911 978 714 3,777 3,609 4,896 5,513

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Acquisition of minority interests in subsidiaries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Business combinations, net of cash - - (66) (122) (2,615) (116) - (3,167) - - - - (188) (5,898) - -

Repayment of acquiress' debt in business combinations - - - - - (26) - - - - - - - (26) - -

Purchase of intangible assets and PPE (141) (107) (81) (116) (113) (162) (95) (173) (124) (133) (133) (177) (445) (543) (567) (639)

Proceeds from disposal of intangible assets and PPE 10 8 8 29 13 9 8 9 - - - - 55 39 - -

Cash transferred to restricted cash - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Reduction of restricted cash - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Purchase of investments (79) (651) (830) (485) (478) (80) (347) (117) - - - - (2,045) (1,022) - -

Proceeds from sale and maturity of marketable sec. 103 83 332 880 430 511 576 137 - - - - 1,398 1,654 - -

Purchase of other financial assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sales of other financial assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change in Liquid Assets - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net cash used in investing activities (107) (667) (637) 186 (2,763) 136 142 (3,311) (124) (133) (133) (177) (1,225) (5,796) (567) (639)

Net Free Cash Flow 1,451 569 617 695 1,958 144 581 383 2,170 779 844 537 3,332 3,066 4,330 4,874

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Dividends paid - (713) - - - (1,310) - - - (1,013) - - (713) (1,310) (1,013) (1,009)

Repurchase of treasury stock (158) - - (88) (53) - - - - - - - (246) (53) - -

Proceeds from reissuance of treasury stock 141 16 13 82 48 21 14 7 48 21 14 7 252 90 90 90

Proceeds from issuance of common stock 29 5 - 12 10 4 1 - - - - - 46 15 - -

Proceeds from debt 2 517 - - 1,000 2 (2) 4,778 - - - - 519 5,778 - -

Other changes to additional paid-in-capital (21) - (3) (4) - - - - - - - - (28) - - -

Payment of debt (504) (501) - - (600) (423) (290) (3,401) (145) (599) - - (1,005) (4,714) (744) (673)

Proceeds from the exercise of derivative instruments - (1) 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Purchase of equity-based derivative instruments - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net cash provided by financing activities (511) (677) 11 2 405 (1,706) (277) 1,384 (97) (1,591) 14 7 (1,175) (194) (1,667) (1,593)

Effect of exchange rate changes (15) 31 (1) 56 (130) 69 28 (119) - - - - 71 (152) - -

Net cash used in discontinued operations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net change in cash and cash equivalents 959 (637) 71 1,055 (417) (1,195) 569 (1,490) 2,073 (812) 858 544 1,448 (2,533) 2,663 3,282

Beginning balance cash and cash equivalents 1,443 2,402 1,765 1,836 2,891 2,474 1,279 1,848 358 2,431 1,619 2,477 1,443 2,891 358 3,021

Ending balance cash and cash equivalents 2,402 1,765 1,836 2,891 2,474 1,279 1,848 358 2,431 1,619 2,477 3,021 2,891 358 3,021 6,303

Fiscal Year Ends December

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates.

Page 34: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 34

Sources and References 1) Technology Association of Georgia – “Don’t Fold Your Cubes Just Yet. . .But In-Memory

Analytics Is Beginning to Mature”

2) Gartner – "In–memory Analytics: Leveraging Emerging Technologies for Business Intelligence"

3) SAP Developer Network – "SAP BW 7.3 Beta Is Available"

4) SAP Developer Network – "SAP HANA: What It Means for Business and for Your Career"

5) SAP – "Statement of Direction: IQ+HANA, November, 2012"

6) SAP – "SOA Made Easy"

7) SAP – "SAP Business Suite, Powered by SAP HANA: Delivering Real–Time Business Value"

8) http://scn.sap.com/people/vishal.sikka/blog/2009/02/05/the-future-of-soa

9) SAP – "Statement of Direction: IQ+HANA, November, 2012"

10) SAP – "Frequently Asked Questions: SAP Business Suite Powered by SAP HANA"

11) http://www.forrester.com

12) SAP – "SAP In–Memory Computing and SAP HANA, Overview and Update" Presentation

13) SAP – "Becoming a Real–Time Business with SAP Business Suite Powered by SAP HANA"

Page 35: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 35

Companies Mentioned (Price as of 05-Apr-2013)

SAP (SAPG.F, €59.76, OUTPERFORM, TP €70.0)

Disclosure Appendix

Important Global Disclosures

Philip Winslow, CFA and Charles Brennan CFA, each certify, with respect to the companies or securities that the individual analyzes, that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of his or her compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.

Price and Rating History for SAP (SAPG.F)

SAPG.F Closing Price Target Price

Date (€) (€) Rating

28-Apr-10 35.66 43.00 O

13-Jan-11 40.51 47.50

28-Apr-11 43.01 50.00

27-Jul-11 43.62 52.00

25-Jan-12 44.50 55.00

24-Jul-12 50.30 57.50

24-Oct-12 55.10 60.00

19-Nov-12 57.27 65.00

* Asterisk signifies initiation or assumption of coverage. O U T PERFO RM

The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received Compensation that is based upon various factors including Credit Suisse's total revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's investment banking activities

As of December 10, 2012 Analysts’ stock rating are defined as follows:

Outperform (O) : The stock’s total return is expected to outperform the relevant benchmark*over the next 12 months.

Neutral (N) : The stock’s total return is expected to be in line with the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.

Underperform (U) : The stock’s total return is expected to underperform the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.

*Relevant benchmark by region: As of 10th December 2012, Japanese ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. As of 2nd October 2012, U.S. and Canadian as well as European ra tings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector , with Outperforms representing the most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investmen t opportunities. For Latin American and non-Japan Asia stocks, ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark; Austr alia, New Zealand are, and prior to 2nd October 2012 U.S. and Canadian ratings were based on (1) a stock’s absolute total return potential to its current share price and (2) the relativ e attractiveness of a stock’s total return potential within an analyst’s coverage universe. For Australian and New Zealand stocks, 12-month rolling yield is incorporated in the absolute total return calculation and a 15% and a 7.5% threshold replace the 10-15% level in the Outperform and Underperform stock rating definitions, respectively. The 15% and 7.5% thresholds replace the +10-15% and -10-15% levels in the Neutral stock rating definition, respectively. Prior to 10th December 2012, Japanese ratings were based on a stock’s total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark.

Restricted (R) : In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications, including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other circumstances.

Volatility Indicator [V] : A stock is defined as volatile if the stock price has moved up or down by 20% or more in a month in at least 8 of the past 24 months or the analyst expects significant volatility going forward.

Analysts’ sector weightings are distinct from analysts’ stock ratings and are based on the analyst’s expectations for the fundamentals and/or valuation of the sector* relative to the group’s historic fundamentals and/or valuation:

Overweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is favorable over the next 12 months.

Market Weight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is neutral over the next 12 months.

Underweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is cautious over the next 12 months.

*An analyst’s coverage sector consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. An analyst may cov er multiple sectors.

Page 36: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 36

Credit Suisse's distribution of stock ratings (and banking clients) is:

Global Ratings Distribution

Rating Versus universe (%) Of which banking clients (%)

Outperform/Buy* 43% (53% banking clients) Neutral/Hold* 39% (47% banking clients) Underperform/Sell* 16% (41% banking clients) Restricted 3%

*For purposes of the NYSE and NASD ratings distribution disclosure requirements, our stock ratings of Outperform, Neutral, an d Underperform most closely correspond to Buy, Hold, and Sell, respectively; however, the meanings are not the same, as our stock ratings are determined on a relative basis. (Please refer to definitions above.) An investor's decision to buy or sell a security should be based on investment objectives, current holdin gs, and other individual factors.

Credit Suisse’s policy is to update research reports as it deems appropriate, based on developments with the subject company, the sector or the market that may have a material impact on the research views or opinions stated herein.

Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail please refer to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research: http://www.csfb.com/research and analytics/disclaimer/managing_conflicts_disclaimer.html

Credit Suisse does not provide any tax advice. Any statement herein regarding any US federal tax is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purposes of avoiding any penalties.

Price Target: (12 months) for SAP (SAPG.F)

Method: Our Eu70 target price is derived as follows. We value SAP on a 5% premium to the European software sector, to reflect the group's strong market positioning and superior growth prospects. This is broadly in line with the group's average sector premium over the past 5 years. This valuation is supported by our DCF model.

Risk: The risks to our target price of Eu70 for SAP are 1) Share loss to competitors such as Oracle, 2) lower-than-expected adoption of the Enterprise Support service contracts due to higher attrition rates 3) slower adoption of HANA than expected, and 4) acquisition integration risks with the newly acquired cloud businesses.

Please refer to the firm's disclosure website at www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures for the definitions of abbreviations typically used in the target price method and risk sections.

See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names

The subject company (SAPG.F) currently is, or was during the 12-month period preceding the date of distribution of this report, a client of Credit Suisse.

Credit Suisse expects to receive or intends to seek investment banking related compensation from the subject company (SAPG.F) within the next 3 months.

As of the end of the preceding month, Credit Suisse beneficially own 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of (SAPG.F).

Important Regional Disclosures

Singapore recipients should contact Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch for any matters arising from this research report.

The analyst(s) involved in the preparation of this report have not visited the material operations of the subject company (SAPG.F) within the past 12 months

Restrictions on certain Canadian securities are indicated by the following abbreviations: NVS--Non-Voting shares; RVS--Restricted Voting Shares; SVS--Subordinate Voting Shares.

Individuals receiving this report from a Canadian investment dealer that is not affiliated with Credit Suisse should be advised that this report may not contain regulatory disclosures the non-affiliated Canadian investment dealer would be required to make if this were its own report.

For Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.'s policies and procedures regarding the dissemination of equity research, please visit http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/canada_research_policy.shtml.

The following disclosed European company/ies have estimates that comply with IFRS: (SAPG.F).

As of the date of this report, Credit Suisse acts as a market maker or liquidity provider in the equities securities that are the subject of this report.

Principal is not guaranteed in the case of equities because equity prices are variable.

Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at any time after that.

To the extent this is a report authored in whole or in part by a non-U.S. analyst and is made available in the U.S., the following are important disclosures regarding any non-U.S. analyst contributors: The non-U.S. research analysts listed below (if any) are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. The non-U.S. research analysts listed below may not be associated persons of CSSU and therefore may not be subject to the

Page 37: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 37

NASD Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account.

Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited ............................................................................................................................. Charles Brennan CFA

For Credit Suisse disclosure information on other companies mentioned in this report, please visit the website at www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683.

Page 38: SAP - Credit Suisse

08 April 2013

SAP (SAPG.F) 38

References in this report to Credit Suisse include all of the subsidiaries and affiliates of Credit Suisse operating under its investment banking division. For more information on our structure, please use the following link: https://www.credit-suisse.com/who_we_are/en/.This report may contain material that is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Credit Suisse AG or its affiliates ("CS") to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to CS. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of CS. All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of CS or its affiliates. The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. CS may not have taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor. CS will not treat recipients of this report as its customers by virtue of their receiving this report. The investments and services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment services. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances, or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation to you. CS does not advise on the tax consequences of investments and you are advised to contact an independent tax adviser. Please note in particular that the bases and levels of taxation may change. Information and opinions presented in this report have been obtained or derived from sources believed by CS to be reliable, but CS makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. CS accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that such liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to CS. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. CS may have issued, and may in the future issue, other communications that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those communications reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and CS is under no obligation to ensure that such other communications are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report. CS may, to the extent permitted by law, participate or invest in financing transactions with the issuer(s) of the securities referred to in this report, perform services for or solicit business from such issuers, and/or have a position or holding, or other material interest, or effect transactions, in such securities or options thereon, or other investments related thereto. In addition, it may make markets in the securities mentioned in the material presented in this report. CS may have, within the last three years, served as manager or co-manager of a public offering of securities for, or currently may make a primary market in issues of, any or all of the entities mentioned in this report or may be providing, or have provided within the previous 12 months, significant advice or investment services in relation to the investment concerned or a related investment. Additional information is, subject to duties of confidentiality, available on request. Some investments referred to in this report will be offered solely by a single entity and in the case of some investments solely by CS, or an associate of CS or CS may be the only market maker in such investments. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publication by CS and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and financial instruments is subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or income of such securities or financial instruments. Investors in securities such as ADR's, the values of which are influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk. Structured securities are complex instruments, typically involve a high degree of risk and are intended for sale only to sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The market value of any structured security may be affected by changes in economic, financial and political factors (including, but not limited to, spot and forward interest and exchange rates), time to maturity, market conditions and volatility, and the credit quality of any issuer or reference issuer. Any investor interested in purchasing a structured product should conduct their own investigation and analysis of the product and consult with their own professional advisers as to the risks involved in making such a purchase. Some investments discussed in this report may have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when that investment is realised. Those losses may equal your original investment. Indeed, in the case of some investments the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment and, in such circumstances, you may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Income yields from investments may fluctuate and, in consequence, initial capital paid to make the investment may be used as part of that income yield. Some investments may not be readily realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments, similarly it may prove difficult for you to obtain reliable information about the value, or risks, to which such an investment is exposed. This report may provide the addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, websites. Except to the extent to which the report refers to website material of CS, CS has not reviewed any such site and takes no responsibility for the content contained therein. Such address or hyperlink (including addresses or hyperlinks to CS's own website material) is provided solely for your convenience and information and the content of any such website does not in any way form part of this document. Accessing such website or following such link through this report or CS's website shall be at your own risk. This report is issued and distributed in Europe (except Switzerland) by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, One Cabot Square, London E14 4QJ, England, which is regulated in the United Kingdom by The Financial Services Authority ("FSA"). This report is being distributed in Germany by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) This report is being distributed in the United States and Canada by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; in Switzerland by Credit Suisse AG; in Brazil by Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A or its affiliates; in Mexico by Banco Credit Suisse (México), S.A. (transactions related to the securities mentioned in this report will only be effected in compliance with applicable regulation); in Japan by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited, Financial Instruments Firm, Director-General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kinsho) No. 66, a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; elsewhere in Asia/ Pacific by whichever of the following is the appropriately authorised entity in the relevant jurisdiction: Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited, Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Thailand) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch, Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (registration Nos. INB230970637; INF230970637; INB010970631; INF010970631), having registered address at 9th Floor, Ceejay House, Dr.A.B. Road, Worli, Mumbai - 18, India, T- +91-22 6777 3777, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, Seoul Branch, Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch, PT Credit Suisse Securities Indonesia, Credit Suisse Securities (Philippines ) Inc., and elsewhere in the world by the relevant authorised affiliate of the above. Research on Taiwanese securities produced by Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch has been prepared by a registered Senior Business Person. Research provided to residents of Malaysia is authorised by the Head of Research for Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, to whom they should direct any queries on +603 2723 2020. This research may not conform to Canadian disclosure requirements. In jurisdictions where CS is not already registered or licensed to trade in securities, transactions will only be effected in accordance with applicable securities legislation, which will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may require that the trade be made in accordance with applicable exemptions from registration or licensing requirements. Non-U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should contact a CS entity in their local jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should do so only by contacting a representative at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in the U.S. Please note that this research was originally prepared and issued by CS for distribution to their market professional and institutional investor customers. Recipients who are not market professional or institutional investor customers of CS should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents. This research may relate to investments or services of a person outside of the UK or to other matters which are not regulated by the FSA or in respect of which the protections of the FSA for private customers and/or the UK compensation scheme may not be available, and further details as to where this may be the case are available upon request in respect of this report. CS may provide various services to US municipal entities or obligated persons ("municipalities"), including suggesting individual transactions or trades and entering into such transactions. Any services CS provides to municipalities are not viewed as "advice" within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. CS is providing any such services and related information solely on an arm's length basis and not as an advisor or fiduciary to the municipality. In connection with the provision of the any such services, there is no agreement, direct or indirect, between any municipality (including the officials, management, employees or agents thereof) and CS for CS to provide advice to the municipality. Municipalities should consult with their financial, accounting and legal advisors regarding any such services provided by CS. In addition, CS is not acting for direct or indirect compensation to solicit the municipality on behalf of an unaffiliated broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, or investment adviser for the purpose of obtaining or retaining an engagement by the municipality for or in connection with Municipal Financial Products, the issuance of municipal securities, or of an investment adviser to provide investment advisory services to or on behalf of the municipality. If this report is being distributed by a financial institution other than Credit Suisse AG, or its affiliates, that financial institution is solely responsible for distribution. Clients of that institution should contact that institution to effect a transaction in the securities mentioned in this report or require further information. This report does not constitute investment advice by Credit Suisse to the clients of the distributing financial institution, and neither Credit Suisse AG, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors and employees accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from their use of this report or its content. Principal is not guaranteed. Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at any time after that.

Copyright © 2013 CREDIT SUISSE AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Investment principal on bonds can be eroded depending on sale price or market price. In addition, there are bonds on which investment principal can be eroded due to changes in redemption amounts. Care is required when investing in such instruments.

When you purchase non-listed Japanese fixed income securities (Japanese government bonds, Japanese municipal bonds, Japanese government guaranteed bonds, Japanese corporate bonds) from CS as a seller, you will be requested to pay the purchase price only.

CS.SAP_4_8_2012_HANAsBringingSexyBackToDatabase.doc

x


Recommended