SARC Report for Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory ... · Aspire Benjamin Holt ... Aspire...

Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy

By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information aboutthe condit ion and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educat ional agencies (LEAs) are required toprepare a Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, w ith specific act ivit ies to addressstate and local priorit ies. Addit ionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent w ith data reported in the SARC.

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Educat ion (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.

For addit ional information about the school, parents/guardians, and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

DataQuest

Internet Access

California Department of Education

School Accountability Report CardReported Using Data from the 2015-16 School Year

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page that contains addit ional information about this school and comparisons of the school tothe district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates,dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners).

Internet access is available at public libraries and other locat ions that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at librariesand public locat ions is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrict ions may include the hours of operat ion, the length of t ime that aworkstat ion may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstat ion, and the ability to print documents.

Jeff Palmquist, PrincipalPrincipal, Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy

Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy is a College for Certain charter school proud to be a part of the Aspirefamily of schools. We serve students grades 6-12 and boast an academic resume unrivaled by local non-select ive schools.Our motto is One Team. One Vision. Our team is excellent, and our vision is lofty but attainable: Every student is preparedto earn a college degree. Thank you for choosing Ben Holt!

Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy3201 East Morada Ln.Stockton, CA 95212-3110

Phone: 209-955-1477E-mail: [email protected]

About Our SchoolAbout Our School

ContactContact

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/

http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/

http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/

mailto:[email protected]

Last updated: 1/5/2017

About This School

Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)

District Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)

District Name Lodi Unified

Phone Number (209) 331-7000

Superintendent Cathy Washer

E-mail Address [email protected]

Web Site www.lodiusd.net

School Contact Information (School Year 2016-17)

School Name Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy

Street 3201 East Morada Ln.

City, State, Zip Stockton, Ca, 95212-3110

Phone Number 209-955-1477

Principal Jeff Palmquist, Principal

E-mail Address [email protected]

Web Site www.aspirepublicschools.org

County-District-School (CDS) Code

39685850101956

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17)School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2016-17)

English and Spanish SARCs can be found on the school's website.

Aspire Benjamin Holt College Prep Academy is a 6-12 school in Stockton that is part of the Aspire Public Schools network. Aspire Benjamin Holt College PrepAcademy opened in 2003

Aspire Public Schools is a non-profit organizat ion that operates high performing charter schools across the state of California that focus on one goal- preparingurban students for college.

Our Vision

Every student is prepared to earn a college degree.

Our Mission

To open and operate small, high-quality charter schools in low-income neighborhoods, in order to:

Increase the academic performance of underserved students

Develop effect ive educators

Share successful pract ices w ith other forward-thinking educators, and

2015-16 SARC - Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory Academy

Page 2 of 30


www.lodiusd.net


www.aspirepublicschools.org

http://aspirepublicschools.org/schools/regions/california-schools/aspire-benjamin-holt-college-preparatory-academy


Catalyze change in public schools.

Our Core Values

Purposefulness: Deliberate act ion, focused on the organizat ion’s goals and priorit ies

Collaborat ion: Working collect ively to accomplish more than what is possible alone

Ownership: Individual and group accountability for results, act ions and decisions

Quality: Commitment to excellence and the discipline to cont inually improve

Customer Service: Responsiveness to the needs of external and internal customers

Aspire Benjamin Holt College Prep Academy is a safe, caring, academically rigorous and inspiring learning environment where students develop the skills, knowledgeand traits to become college-educated leaders in their communit ies.

The School's mission is to provide all students w ith an except ional educat ion that allow them to excel inside and outside the classroom. The School seeks toachieve this mission by providing students a rigorous core curriculum, a well-trained staff, high standards and expectat ions, extended instruct ional hours andsupport, personalized learning opportunit ies, and early access to college-preparatory experiences. By ensuring students become voracious, self-motivated,competent and lifelong learners. The School w ill prepare them not only for college but also for the 21st Century world.


Page 3 of 30



Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16)Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2015-16)

Grade Level Number of Students

Grade 6 129

Grade 7 126

Grade 8 128

Grade 9 104

Grade 10 81

Grade 11 92

Grade 12 70

Total Enrollment 730

Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 120

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16)Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2015-16)

Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment

Black or African American 5.2 %

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0.5 %

Asian 18.6 %

Filipino 4.5 %

Hispanic or Lat ino 38.5 %

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.7 %

White 27.4 %

Two or More Races 4.5 %

Other 0.1 %

Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 36.2 %

English Learners 2.5 %

Students w ith Disabilit ies 4.7 %

Foster Youth 0.5 %


Page 4 of 30



A. Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1):

Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credent ialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;Pupils have access to standards-aligned instruct ional materials; andSchool facilit ies are maintained in good repair

Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of posit ions filled by teachers who lack legal authorizat ion to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc.

* Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English learners.

Teacher CredentialsTeacher Credentials

Teachers School District

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2016-17

With Full Credent ial 27 23 24

Without Full Credent ial 1 0 0

Teachers Teaching Outside SubjectArea of Competence (w ith fullcredent ial)

1 0 5

2014-15 2015-16 2016-170

5

10

15

20

25

30Teachers with Full Credential

Teachers without Full Credential

Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher PositionsTeacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Indicator2014-

152015-

162016-

17

Misassignments of Teachers of EnglishLearners

0 0 4

Total Teacher Misassignments* 2 1 9

Vacant Teacher Posit ions 1 0 0

2014-15 2015-16 2016-170

2

4

6

8

10Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners

Total Teacher Misassignments

Vacant Teacher Positions


Page 5 of 30



Note: High-poverty schools are defined as those schools w ith student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those w ith student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program.

Year and month in which data were collected: January 2016

Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16)Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers (School Year 2015-16)

Location of ClassesPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Taught by

Highly Qualified TeachersPercent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Not Taught by

Highly Qualified Teachers

This School 76.0% 24.0%

All Schools in District 86.0% 15.0%

High-Poverty Schoolsin District

85.0% 15.0%

Low-Poverty Schoolsin District

87.0% 13.0%

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17)Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17)

Note: Cells w ith N/A values do not require data.

SubjectTextbooks and Instructional Materials/year of

AdoptionFrom Most Recent

Adoption?Percent Students Lacking Own Assigned

Copy

Reading/Language ArtsGood quality and availability

0.0 %

MathematicsGood quality and availability

0.0 %

ScienceGood quality and availability

0.0 %

History-Social ScienceGood quality and availability

0.0 %

Foreign LanguageN/A

0.0 %

HealthN/A

0.0 %

Visual and Performing ArtsN/A

0.0 %

Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades9-12)

N/A N/A 0.0 %


Page 6 of 30



School Facility Good Repair StatusYear and month of the most recent FIT report: January 2016

Overall Facility RateYear and month of the most recent FIT report: January 2016

School Facility Conditions and Planned ImprovementsSchool Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements

This school is in good condit ion

System Inspected Rating

Repair Needed andAction Taken or

Planned

Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC,Sewer

Good

Interior: Interior Surfaces Good

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness,Pest/Vermin Infestat ion

Good

Electrical: Electrical Good

Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms,Sinks/Fountains

Good

Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Good

Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs Good

External: Playground/School Grounds,W indows/Doors/Gates/Fences

Good

Overall Rat ing Good


Page 7 of 30


B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4):

Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced SummativeAssessments for students in the general educat ion populat ion and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] andmathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. The CAAs have replaced the California Alternate Performance Assessment [CAPA] for ELA andmathematics, which were eliminated in 2015. Only eligible students may part icipate in the administrat ion of the CAAs. CAA items are aligned w ith alternateachievement standards, which are linked w ith the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students w ith significant cognit ive disabilit ies); and

The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that sat isfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the CaliforniaState University, or career technical educat ion sequences or programs of study.

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All StudentsCAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students

Subject

Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards

School District State

2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16

English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 58.0% 55.0% 38.0% 41.0% 44.0% 48.0%

Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 47.0% 45.0% 29.0% 31.0% 34.0% 36.0%


Page 8 of 30


Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the total number ofstudents who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAsdivided by the total number of students who part icipated in both assessments.

Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: The number of students tested includes all students who part icipated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students testedis not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who receivedscores.

ELA- ELA- Grade 6Grade 6

Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded

All Students 129 128 99.2% 53.1%

Male 71 71 100.0% 49.3%

Female 58 57 98.3% 57.9%

Black or African American -- -- -- --

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive -- -- -- --

Asian 20 20 100.0% 65.0%

Filipino -- -- -- --

Hispanic or Lat ino 45 45 100.0% 35.6%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- --

White 37 36 97.3% 66.7%

Two or More Races -- -- -- --

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 41 41 100.0% 41.5%

English Learners -- -- -- --

Students w ith Disabilit ies -- -- -- --

Students Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services -- -- -- --

Foster Youth -- -- -- --


Page 9 of 30





ELA - Grade 7ELA - Grade 7


All Students 128 127 99.2% 45.7%

Male 61 61 100.0% 37.7%

Female 67 66 98.5% 53.0%



Asian 11 11 100.0% 54.6%




White 50 50 100.0% 48.0%








Page 10 of 30







All Students 128 128 100.0% 46.9%

Male 58 58 100.0% 41.4%

Female 70 70 100.0% 51.4%



Asian 18 18 100.0% 61.1%




White 36 36 100.0% 50.0%








Page 11 of 30







All Students 89 88 98.9% 85.2%

Male 39 39 100.0% 79.5%

Female 50 49 98.0% 89.8%



Asian 25 25 100.0% 80.0%




White 20 20 100.0% 90.0%








Page 12 of 30


Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the totalnumber of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard onthe CAAs divided by the total number of students who part icipated in both assessments.



Mathematics - Grade 6Mathematics - Grade 6


All Students 129 128 99.2% 36.7%

Male 71 71 100.0% 35.2%

Female 58 57 98.3% 38.6%



Asian 20 20 100.0% 35.0%




White 37 36 97.3% 58.3%








Page 13 of 30







All Students 128 127 99.2% 52.8%

Male 61 61 100.0% 45.9%

Female 67 66 98.5% 59.1%



Asian 11 11 100.0% 72.7%




White 50 50 100.0% 54.0%








Page 14 of 30







All Students 128 128 100.0% 28.9%

Male 58 58 100.0% 34.5%

Female 70 70 100.0% 24.3%



Asian 18 18 100.0% 44.4%




White 36 36 100.0% 41.7%








Page 15 of 30







All Students 89 88 98.9% 67.1%

Male 39 39 100.0% 61.5%

Female 50 49 98.0% 71.4%



Asian 25 25 100.0% 64.0%




White 20 20 100.0% 75.0%








Page 16 of 30



Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) ingrades five, eight, and ten.

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

CAASPP Tests Results in Science by Student GroupGrades Five, Eight and Grade Ten (School Year 2015-16)

Note: Science test results include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades five, eight, and ten. The “Proficient or Advanced” is calculated by taking the total number of studentswho scored at Proficient or Advanced on the science assessment divided by the total number of students w ith valid scores.

Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for stat ist icalaccuracy or to protect student privacy.

CAASPP Test Results in Science for All StudentsCAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students

Subject

Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced


2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 76.0% 76.0% 50.0% 55.0% 51.0% 50.0% 60.0% 56.0% 54.0%

Student GroupTotal

EnrollmentNumber of Students with Valid

ScoresPercent of Students with Valid

ScoresPercent Proficient or

Advanced

All Students 208 205 98.6% 50.2%

Male 99 98 99.0% 58.2%

Female 109 107 98.2% 43.0%



Asian 30 30 100.0% 40.0%




White 50 50 100.0% 60.0%

Two or More Races 12 12 100.0% 50.0%




Students Receiving Migrant Educat ionServices

0 0 0.0% 0.0%



Page 17 of 30


Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2015-16)Career Technical Education Programs (School Year 2015-16)

N/A

Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) AdmissionCourses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission

UC/CSU Course Measure Percent

2015-16 Pupils Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 100.0%

2014-15 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 100.0%


Page 18 of 30



State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8):

Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical educat ion

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16)California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2015-16)

Grade Level

Percentage of Students Meeting Fitness Standards

Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards

7 0.0% 0.8% 99.2%

9 15.7% 35.3% 45.1%


Page 19 of 30


C. Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3):

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite

State Priority: Pupil Engagement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5):

High school dropout rates; andHigh school graduat ion rates

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17)Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17)

Family and Community Involvement

Aspire encourages all groups to part icipate in and share responsibility for the educat ional process and educat ional results. In order to achieve this important end,the School plans to share local control w ith an Advisory School Council (“ASC”), consist ing of family and school representat ives. Each school’s ASC may part icipatein developing school policies and share in efforts to engage the support of the community. The ASC may make recommendations about issues related to theschool and part icipate in review ing family and community concerns. The ASC w ill consist of representat ives of the follow ing part ies: the principal, teachers, andfamily members. The principal is responsible for communicat ing all ASC policy recommendations to the Aspire Board of Directors. In short, Aspire’s Board ofDirectors oversees issues related to Aspire schools in general, while the ASCs focus on the day-to-day concerns of each respect ive Aspire school.

Additional Opportunities for Family Involvement

Families, students and teachers meet at least tw ice a year to plan and assess the students’ learning progress and determine goals

Exhibit ion Panels – families may sit on panels to judge student work

School and Staff Evaluat ions – families fill out a survey each year evaluat ing the strengths and weaknesses they ident ify w ith the program at the School

Student-led Conferences – students w ill lead conferences on their work during the year to keep their families informed

Volunteer Opportunit ies – various opportunit ies w ill arise for families to volunteer, such as helping in classrooms, leading extra-curricular act ivit ies, assist ing inevent planning, attending study trips, and serving on family committees

Fundraising – families and community members may work w ith the school to raise addit ional resources to support students and the school program

Aspire Board of Directors Meet ings – families and community members are welcome to the Board meeting. In compliance w ith the Brown Act, Aspireposts the agenda for Aspire Board of Directors meetings at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.


Page 20 of 30


Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)

Indicator


2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Dropout Rate 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 10.3% 12.3% 7.9% 11.4% 11.5% 10.7%

Graduat ion Rate 93.00 95.30 100.00 82.80 80.60 85.40

Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart

2012-13 2013-14 2014-150

20

40

60

80

100

120Dropout Rate

Graduation Rate


Page 21 of 30

Completion of High School Graduation Requirements - Graduating Class of 2015 Completion of High School Graduation Requirements - Graduating Class of 2015

(One-Year Rate)(One-Year Rate)

Student Group School District State

All Students 94 85 85

Black or African American 100 68 77

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0 60 75

Asian 91 89 99

Filipino 100 93 97

Hispanic or Lat ino 97 84 84

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 89 85

White 88 87 87

Two or More Races 100 90 91

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 34 87 77

English Learners 0 73 51

Students w ith Disabilit ies 0 41 68

Foster Youth -- -- --


Page 22 of 30



State Priority: School Climate

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6):

Pupil suspension rates;Pupil expulsion rates; andOther local measures on the sense of safety

School Safety Plan (School Year 2016-17)

Suspensions and ExpulsionsSuspensions and Expulsions


Rate 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Suspensions 4.4 4.3 4.0 4.4 3.8 3.7

Expulsions 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1

Suspensions

2013-14 2014-15 2015-160.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0School Suspensions

District Suspensions

State Suspensions

Expulsions

2013-14 2014-15 2015-160.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12School Expulsions

District Expulsions

State Expulsions

STATEMENT OF SAFETY POLICY

It is the policy of Aspire Public Schools (“Aspire”) to strive for the highest safety standards and to provide a safe workplace for all employees and a safe school forall students. Aspire has developed a comprehensive Injury and Illness Prevent ion Program (“IIP Program”) to achieve this end. The goal of this program is tominimize the frequency and severity of employee and student accidents and to comply w ith the laws and regulat ions that pertain to our operat ions. The programhas been designed to eliminate physical hazards from the work and school environment and train all employees in safe work pract ices.

ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY

Aspire Principals have the ult imate responsibility for the implementat ion and enforcement of the IIP Program at their school site. AspireOffice Managers and are responsible for the record keeping and coordinat ion of the safety training programs at their school site. Employees – It is theresponsibility of all Aspire employees to bring any unsafe act ions, pract ices, or condit ions to the attent ion of his/her manager or supervisor.

DISASTER PLANS

Disaster plans are located in each classroom. Each plan is site and classroom specific and covers such disasters as fire safety, earthquake safety, flood, severeweather warnings, electrical failure, gas line problems, water main breaks, water contaminat ion, chemical spills, lockdown/shoot ing incidents, bomb threats,explosions, and intruders.


Page 23 of 30



Page 24 of 30


D. Other SARC InformationThe information in this sect ion is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorit ies for LCFF.

Note: Cells w ith NA values do not require data.

Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17)Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2016-17)

Indicator School District

Program Improvement Status In PI In PI

First Year of Program Improvement 2012-2013 2004-2005

Year in Program Improvement Year 2 Year 3

Number of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 19

Percent of Schools Current ly in Program Improvement N/A 76.0%


Page 25 of 30




* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information isreported by subject area rather than grade level.

Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2015-16)


*One Full T ime Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full t ime; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full t ime.


Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary)

2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Subject Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

Average Class Size

Number of Classes *

1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+ 1-22 23-32 33+

English 31.0 0 19 2 23.0 11 14 0 23.0 14 15 3

Mathematics 30.0 0 21 2 24.0 5 13 0 30.0 3 14 2

Science 30.0 0 18 1 31.0 1 12 5 30.0 3 20 0

Social Science 31.0 0 16 1 32.0 0 11 5 29.0 2 17 1

Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor

Academic Counselor 2.0 350.0

Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 1.0 N/A

Library Media Teacher (librarian) 0.0 N/A

Library Media Services Staff (paraprofessional) 0.0 N/A

Psychologist 0.4 N/A

Social Worker 0.0 N/A

Nurse 0.0 N/A

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.4 N/A

Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.0 N/A

Other N/A

Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)

LevelTotal Expenditures Per

PupilExpenditures Per Pupil

(Supplemental/Restricted)

Expenditures PerPupil

(Basic/Unrestricted)Average Teacher

Salary

School Site $7289.0 $1291.0 $5998.0 $51479.0

District N/A N/A $0.0 $67015.0

Percent Difference – School Site andDistrict

-- -- -- --

State N/A N/A $5677.0 $75837.0

Percent Difference – School Site and State -- -- -- --


Page 26 of 30


For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Cert ificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ .

Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2015-16)Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2015-16)

Senior Financial Aid Night

Sports Programs

ASC Meetings

Special Educat ion

Read 180

iPass

Tutoring

Math Professional Development for Teachers

Writ ing Professional Development for Teachers

AVID Professional Development for Teachers

Science Olympiad

Exhibit ions

Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2014-15)

Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary $38,683 $45,092

Mid-Range Teacher Salary $61,457 $71,627

Highest Teacher Salary $83,533 $93,288

Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $111,552 $115,631

Average Principal Salary (Middle) $116,360 $120,915

Average Principal Salary (High) $130,868 $132,029

Superintendent Salary $243,800 $249,537

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 39.0% 37.0%

Percent of Budget for Administrat ive Salaries 5.0% 5.0%

Teacher Salary Chart

90000

Principal Salary Chart

150000


Page 27 of 30

http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/


Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

Average Principal Salary

(Elementary)


(Middle)


(High)

0

25000

50000

75000

100000

125000


Page 28 of 30



*Where there are student course enrollments of at least one student.

Advanced Placement (AP) Courses (School Year 2015-16)Advanced Placement (AP) Courses (School Year 2015-16)

Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of Students In AP Courses

Computer Science 0 N/A

English 0 N/A

Fine and Performing Arts 0 N/A

Foreign Language 0 N/A

Mathematics 0 N/A

Science 2 N/A

Social Science 0 N/A

All Courses 2 16.0%


Page 29 of 30


Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development

Aspire is committed to the professional development of all of its team members. Once teachers are hired, Aspire invests in their cont inued professionaldevelopment. Teachers new to Aspire part icipate in 1-2 weeks of summer training to build classroom management skills, increase their capacity to plan meaningfuland engaging lessons, and pract ice specific Instruct ional Guidelines that are core to the Aspire educat ion program. As follow-up they receive on-going coachingsupport from a variety of individuals to reinforce and deepen their training.

The School Principal, in his/her capacity as instruct ional leader, provides on-site coaching to all teachers. Teachers are organized into teams, led by an experienced“lead teacher” who has the skills to mentor others. Teachers are given t ime during the regular school day to collaborate and support each other to reach theSchools’ and individual students’ learning goals. This includes common preparat ion t ime through use of Integral Subjects (e.g. music, Spanish) and early releasedays on Wednesdays.

Aspire also has instruct ional coaches who travel between school sites to provide addit ional support, give one on-one consultat ion, and conduct school-basedprofessional development sessions. Instruct ional coaches also guide experienced educators in their applicat ion for cert ificat ion from the Nat ional Board forProfessional Teaching Standards. In addit ion, Aspire conducts one or two regional training sessions in areas ident ified as system-wide weaknesses based on theprior year’s STAR results. Teachers are observed and given feedback a minimum of four t imes per year by their school administrator.


Page 30 of 30

Date post:	27-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	ledung
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

SARC Report for Aspire Benjamin Holt College Preparatory ... · Aspire Benjamin Holt ... Aspire...

Documents