1
Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience
at a Distribution Substation
Franco Moriconi, Francisco De La Rosa, Albert Nelson, Larry Masur, Zenergy Power Inc., US;
Detlev Kirsten, Zenergy Power GmbH, DE
CIRED Frankfurt (Germany)
6-9 June 2011RIFS1, 0680
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 2
Zenergy Power FCL Operating Principle and Advantages FCL Program Overview and Roadmap Field Experience at Distribution Substation The Compact FCL design for HV applications Summary & Conclusions
Outline
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 3
Zenergy’s Business Fields and Markets
Magnetic Billet Heater(‘MBH’)
Fault CurrentLimiter(‘FCL’)
IndustrialHeating of Metals
Smart GridHardware
Low-cost large-scale Renewable Energy Generation
In-house coiling of superconductorwire
Expertise in superconductive materials Expertise in products and services End markets
Next generationlow cost wire (2G)
Coilsfor Generators
Image Courtesy of Converteam
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 4
G
Fault Current Limiter
EmbeddedGeneration
Incoming Feeder
Bus Tie
Faulty network
Typical applications of Fault Current Limiters:- Network reinforcement- Protection of network components
(transformers, switchgear, busbars)- Distributed Generation connection- Power quality
Inherently fail safe and self healing devices for electric utilitiesGrid Protection with Fault Current Limiters
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 5
Picture-Frame Iron Cores
AC CoilAC Coil
Boost Buck
Configuration for single phase MFCL.
BoostBuck
Operating Principle of Saturated-Core FCLTrade Name “Magnetic Fault Current Limiter” (MFCL)
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 6
Operating Principle of MFCL
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 7
Advantages
– Fast: acts within the first ¼ cycle– Self-triggering: passive device– Self-recovering: does not interrupt current– Scalable: MV to HV applications– Robust: designed for 3s short circuit currents
and CB automatic reclosing– Reliable: 24/7 operation– Fail Safe: fails in high impedance state ensuring protection at all times– Automatic: full remote monitoring/data– Transparent: reduce or eliminate issues associated with reactors. This includes
transient recovery voltages and high insertion impedances.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 8
Zenergy Power Milestones of„Magnetic Fault Current Limiter“ Development
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
MV lab-scale demonstrator built and tested
12kV prototype built & tested
12kV prototype installed & on the grid from 03.2009 to 11.2010
15kV compact design demonstrators #1,2,3&4 built and tested
11kV commercial prototype built
138kV lab-scale prototypes tested
11kV commercial prototype high power tested
138 kV prototype manufacturing phase #1
33kV commercial design started Q2 2011
11kV commercial prototype landmark operation
138kV prototype three-phase #2&3
138kV prototype landmark operation
2013 2014 2015
HV Prototype
10-36kV com
MV Prototype
Demonstrator
Lab-Test
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 9
- Serving 1400 commercial and residential customers - Online March 9, 2009, collecting data continuously since installation - Scheduled decommissioning in November 2010
Zenergy PowerMFCL
MFCL 15kV Class at SCE Shandin Substation, San Bernardino, California
Experience at Distribution Substation
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 10
115 kV LINE
115/12kVTransformer
AUTO-BYPASSSWITCH
First installation in U.S. electricity gridOperated by Southern California EdisonSupported by U.S. Department of Energy and California Energy Commission
Experience at Distribution Substation
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 11
Experience at Distribution Substation
TEST ReferenceWinding Resistance IEEE Std C57.16-1996Impedance IEEE Std C57.16-1996Total loss IEEE Std C57.16-1996Temperature rise IEEE Std C57.16-1996Applied voltage IEEE Std C57.16-1996Insulation power factor IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Insulation resistance IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Short Circuit SCE ProtocolTurn-to-turn IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Lightning impulse @110 kV IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Chopped-wave impulse IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Audible sound SCE ProtocolPartial Discharge IEEE Std C57.16-1996Seismic Verification IEEE Std 693
NAMEPLATERated Voltage 15 kVRated Current 1200 kAFrequency 60 HzN. of phases 3BIL 110 kVShort Circuit Duty 23 kAShort Circuit Duration 30 cyclesAsymmetry Factor 2.7Insertion Impedance 1 %
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 12
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50TEST 77 - DOUBLE FAULT SEQUENCE - 20kA X/R=22, FCL IN
Time [sec]
Line
Cur
rent
[kA
]
Phase APhase BPhase C
0.5 1 1.5 2-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50TEST 77 - 1.25s - 80 cycles FAULT - 20kA X/R=22, FCL IN
Time [sec]
Line
Cur
rent
[kA
]
Phase APhase BPhase CRecovery Under
Load23 kA rms X/R=44 3-phase to Ground30 Cycles
Double FaultRecovery Under Load20 kA rms X/R = 22 3-phase to Ground20 CyclesEndurance Test20 kA rms X/R=22 3-phase to Ground82 Cycles
Fully Tested
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 13
three seconds phase-to phase fault
Experience at Distribution Substation:In-grid fault events
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 14
Summary of Operating Experience:MFCL at Southern California Edison´s Shandin substation
MFCL has operated continuously since Mar 2009 and was decommissioned in Dec 2010
Operating in a hot, windy, and dusty outdoor environment (-1°C to +42°C) Experienced one loss of DC Bias with consequent “resonance” condition (see
IEEE paper) Successful integration with automatic bypass switch by utility Experienced one fault event with multiple faults in quick succession
on 14 January 2010 Rode through two “Loss of Station Power” events
Effective bypass of MFCL and shut-down of the HTS coil (as expected) “Station power failures” caused by grid disturbances not on Avanti circuit Instantaneous bypassing sought by SCE
Performed routine maintenance on cryogenics compressors
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 15
AC input AC output
Picture frame single phase Compact single phase
HTS coil
Compact MFCL Design
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 16
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30FCL DESIGN PERFORMANCE - 3-PHASE-TO-GROUND
Time [sec]
Line
Cur
rent
[kA
]
Prospective Current phBFCL Limited Current phB
Compact MFCL – Fully Tested
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 17
Path from DEMONSTRATOR to COMMERCIAL DESIGN
SPIDER:2.5x2.5 m footprintEffective core 300 cm2
Rectangular COMPACT:2.0x1.3 m footprintEffective core 860 cm2
ROUND COMPACT:1.8m OD footprintEffective core 750 cm2
FROMDEMONSTRATOR
TOPROTOTYPE
TOCOMMERCIAL
PRODUCT
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 18
Customer: ASLOperator: CE Electric, UK
15 kV Voltage Rating3-Phase, 50 Hz1.25 kA Nominal Current17 kApeak Prospective Fault Current3 Second Fault Duration<1% Insertion ImpedanceReduce Fault by 23% => 13.25 kApeak
Recovery Under Load
MFCL System for CE Electric substation, UK
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 19
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
Time [sec]
LIN
E C
UR
RE
NT
[kA
]
Three Phase Fault - 3 seconds
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 380
100
120
140
160
180
200
Time [sec]
DC
CU
RR
EN
T [A
]
HTS Current 3 second fault
Compact MFCL – Fully Tested – 3 seconds
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 20
High Voltage MFCL 138kV at AEP Tidd Substation, OhioRequirements Summary Rated 138 kV, 1,300 A ~ 20 kA prospective fault Reduce fault by 50% Recovery under load required Fault test single-phase end 2011 Install 3-phase device mid 2012
FCLMFCL will replace Air Core Reactors
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 21
100 MVA0.42 kA
320 MVA1.3 kA
2%
6.2%
10 kA
50 %
0.5%
1.5% CurrentPower
VoltageDrop
3.8 WReactor
FCL
138kV MFCL Design: 3 single-phases
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011
Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 22
SUMMARY: Zenergy Power´s MFCL 1st installation of the MFCL in March 2009 at Avanti circuit of Southern CaliforniaEdison, utility serving Los Angeles/San Bernardino county, for 1.5 year operation name plate rating 15 kV / 1,200 A 20% clipping of max. 23 kApeak prospective fault current
Compact MFCL prototype for ConEd in New York City, 2009 rated 13.8 kV / 2,500-4,000 A successful testing in July 2009, data are confidential to ConEdison
Distribution class MFCL underway for deployment and commissioning in Q3 2011 for ASL/CE Electric in UK name plate rating 12 kV / 1,250-1,600 A 23% clipping of max. 17 kApeak prospective fault current2011: ASL ordered 33kV FCL engineering study for CE Electric UK.
Transmission class MFCL in manufacturing for deployment in Mid-2012 for AEP American Electric Power in Ohio rated 138 kV / 1,300 A 43% clipping of max. 20 kApeak prospective fault current