+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience at a Distribution Substation

Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience at a Distribution Substation

Date post: 25-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: feo
View: 73 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience at a Distribution Substation. Franco Moriconi , Francisco De La Rosa, Albert Nelson, Larry Masur, Zenergy Power Inc., US; Detlev Kirsten, Zenergy Power GmbH, DE CIRED Frankfurt (Germany) 6-9 June 2011 RIFS1, 0680. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
22
Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience at a Distribution Substation Franco Moriconi , Francisco De La Rosa, Albert Nelson, Larry Masur, Zenergy Power Inc., US; Detlev Kirsten, Zenergy Power GmbH, DE CIRED Frankfurt (Germany) 6-9 June 2011 RIFS1, 0680 1
Transcript
Page 1: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

1

Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience

at a Distribution Substation

Franco Moriconi, Francisco De La Rosa, Albert Nelson, Larry Masur, Zenergy Power Inc., US;

Detlev Kirsten, Zenergy Power GmbH, DE

CIRED Frankfurt (Germany)

6-9 June 2011RIFS1, 0680

Page 2: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 2

Zenergy Power FCL Operating Principle and Advantages FCL Program Overview and Roadmap Field Experience at Distribution Substation The Compact FCL design for HV applications Summary & Conclusions

Outline

Page 3: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 3

Zenergy’s Business Fields and Markets

Magnetic Billet Heater(‘MBH’)

Fault CurrentLimiter(‘FCL’)

IndustrialHeating of Metals

Smart GridHardware

Low-cost large-scale Renewable Energy Generation

In-house coiling of superconductorwire

Expertise in superconductive materials Expertise in products and services End markets

Next generationlow cost wire (2G)

Coilsfor Generators

Image Courtesy of Converteam

Page 4: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 4

G

Fault Current Limiter

EmbeddedGeneration

Incoming Feeder

Bus Tie

Faulty network

Typical applications of Fault Current Limiters:- Network reinforcement- Protection of network components

(transformers, switchgear, busbars)- Distributed Generation connection- Power quality

Inherently fail safe and self healing devices for electric utilitiesGrid Protection with Fault Current Limiters

Page 5: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 5

Picture-Frame Iron Cores

AC CoilAC Coil

Boost Buck

Configuration for single phase MFCL.

BoostBuck

Operating Principle of Saturated-Core FCLTrade Name “Magnetic Fault Current Limiter” (MFCL)

Page 6: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 6

Operating Principle of MFCL

Page 7: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 7

Advantages

– Fast: acts within the first ¼ cycle– Self-triggering: passive device– Self-recovering: does not interrupt current– Scalable: MV to HV applications– Robust: designed for 3s short circuit currents

and CB automatic reclosing– Reliable: 24/7 operation– Fail Safe: fails in high impedance state ensuring protection at all times– Automatic: full remote monitoring/data– Transparent: reduce or eliminate issues associated with reactors. This includes

transient recovery voltages and high insertion impedances.

Page 8: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 8

Zenergy Power Milestones of„Magnetic Fault Current Limiter“ Development

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

MV lab-scale demonstrator built and tested

12kV prototype built & tested

12kV prototype installed & on the grid from 03.2009 to 11.2010

15kV compact design demonstrators #1,2,3&4 built and tested

11kV commercial prototype built

138kV lab-scale prototypes tested

11kV commercial prototype high power tested

138 kV prototype manufacturing phase #1

33kV commercial design started Q2 2011

11kV commercial prototype landmark operation

138kV prototype three-phase #2&3

138kV prototype landmark operation

2013 2014 2015

HV Prototype

10-36kV com

MV Prototype

Demonstrator

Lab-Test

Page 9: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 9

- Serving 1400 commercial and residential customers - Online March 9, 2009, collecting data continuously since installation - Scheduled decommissioning in November 2010

Zenergy PowerMFCL

MFCL 15kV Class at SCE Shandin Substation, San Bernardino, California

Experience at Distribution Substation

Page 10: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 10

115 kV LINE

115/12kVTransformer

AUTO-BYPASSSWITCH

First installation in U.S. electricity gridOperated by Southern California EdisonSupported by U.S. Department of Energy and California Energy Commission

Experience at Distribution Substation

Page 11: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 11

Experience at Distribution Substation

TEST ReferenceWinding Resistance IEEE Std C57.16-1996Impedance IEEE Std C57.16-1996Total loss IEEE Std C57.16-1996Temperature rise IEEE Std C57.16-1996Applied voltage IEEE Std C57.16-1996Insulation power factor IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Insulation resistance IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Short Circuit SCE ProtocolTurn-to-turn IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Lightning impulse @110 kV IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Chopped-wave impulse IEEE Std C57-12.01-2005Audible sound SCE ProtocolPartial Discharge IEEE Std C57.16-1996Seismic Verification IEEE Std 693

NAMEPLATERated Voltage 15 kVRated Current 1200 kAFrequency 60 HzN. of phases 3BIL 110 kVShort Circuit Duty 23 kAShort Circuit Duration 30 cyclesAsymmetry Factor 2.7Insertion Impedance 1 %

Page 12: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 12

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50TEST 77 - DOUBLE FAULT SEQUENCE - 20kA X/R=22, FCL IN

Time [sec]

Line

Cur

rent

[kA

]

Phase APhase BPhase C

0.5 1 1.5 2-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50TEST 77 - 1.25s - 80 cycles FAULT - 20kA X/R=22, FCL IN

Time [sec]

Line

Cur

rent

[kA

]

Phase APhase BPhase CRecovery Under

Load23 kA rms X/R=44 3-phase to Ground30 Cycles

Double FaultRecovery Under Load20 kA rms X/R = 22 3-phase to Ground20 CyclesEndurance Test20 kA rms X/R=22 3-phase to Ground82 Cycles

Fully Tested

Page 13: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 13

three seconds phase-to phase fault

Experience at Distribution Substation:In-grid fault events

Page 14: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 14

Summary of Operating Experience:MFCL at Southern California Edison´s Shandin substation

MFCL has operated continuously since Mar 2009 and was decommissioned in Dec 2010

Operating in a hot, windy, and dusty outdoor environment (-1°C to +42°C) Experienced one loss of DC Bias with consequent “resonance” condition (see

IEEE paper) Successful integration with automatic bypass switch by utility Experienced one fault event with multiple faults in quick succession

on 14 January 2010 Rode through two “Loss of Station Power” events

Effective bypass of MFCL and shut-down of the HTS coil (as expected) “Station power failures” caused by grid disturbances not on Avanti circuit Instantaneous bypassing sought by SCE

Performed routine maintenance on cryogenics compressors

Page 15: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 15

AC input AC output

Picture frame single phase Compact single phase

HTS coil

Compact MFCL Design

Page 16: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 16

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30FCL DESIGN PERFORMANCE - 3-PHASE-TO-GROUND

Time [sec]

Line

Cur

rent

[kA

]

Prospective Current phBFCL Limited Current phB

Compact MFCL – Fully Tested

Page 17: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 17

Path from DEMONSTRATOR to COMMERCIAL DESIGN

SPIDER:2.5x2.5 m footprintEffective core 300 cm2

Rectangular COMPACT:2.0x1.3 m footprintEffective core 860 cm2

ROUND COMPACT:1.8m OD footprintEffective core 750 cm2

FROMDEMONSTRATOR

TOPROTOTYPE

TOCOMMERCIAL

PRODUCT

Page 18: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 18

Customer: ASLOperator: CE Electric, UK

15 kV Voltage Rating3-Phase, 50 Hz1.25 kA Nominal Current17 kApeak Prospective Fault Current3 Second Fault Duration<1% Insertion ImpedanceReduce Fault by 23% => 13.25 kApeak

Recovery Under Load

MFCL System for CE Electric substation, UK

Page 19: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 19

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

Time [sec]

LIN

E C

UR

RE

NT

[kA

]

Three Phase Fault - 3 seconds

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 380

100

120

140

160

180

200

Time [sec]

DC

CU

RR

EN

T [A

]

HTS Current 3 second fault

Compact MFCL – Fully Tested – 3 seconds

Page 20: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 20

High Voltage MFCL 138kV at AEP Tidd Substation, OhioRequirements Summary Rated 138 kV, 1,300 A ~ 20 kA prospective fault Reduce fault by 50% Recovery under load required Fault test single-phase end 2011 Install 3-phase device mid 2012

FCLMFCL will replace Air Core Reactors

Page 21: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 21

100 MVA0.42 kA

320 MVA1.3 kA

2%

6.2%

10 kA

50 %

0.5%

1.5% CurrentPower

VoltageDrop

3.8 WReactor

FCL

138kV MFCL Design: 3 single-phases

Page 22: Saturated-Core Fault Current Limiter Field Experience  at a Distribution Substation

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011

Moriconi, DeLaRosa, Masur, Nelson, Kirsten – US – RIFS1 – 0680 22

SUMMARY: Zenergy Power´s MFCL 1st installation of the MFCL in March 2009 at Avanti circuit of Southern CaliforniaEdison, utility serving Los Angeles/San Bernardino county, for 1.5 year operation name plate rating 15 kV / 1,200 A 20% clipping of max. 23 kApeak prospective fault current

Compact MFCL prototype for ConEd in New York City, 2009 rated 13.8 kV / 2,500-4,000 A successful testing in July 2009, data are confidential to ConEdison

Distribution class MFCL underway for deployment and commissioning in Q3 2011 for ASL/CE Electric in UK name plate rating 12 kV / 1,250-1,600 A 23% clipping of max. 17 kApeak prospective fault current2011: ASL ordered 33kV FCL engineering study for CE Electric UK.

Transmission class MFCL in manufacturing for deployment in Mid-2012 for AEP American Electric Power in Ohio rated 138 kV / 1,300 A 43% clipping of max. 20 kApeak prospective fault current


Recommended