Date post: | 07-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | scott-nicol |
View: | 43 times |
Download: | 0 times |
SBI Tactical Infrastructure Program Review
Loren FlossmanProgram Manager, SBI Tactical Infrastructure Program OfficeU.S. Customs and Border ProtectionVersion 5
005831
25/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 2
SBI TI Program Overview
Authorities for the construction of tactical infrastructure
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996
The Secure Fence Act of 2006
CBP established the Secure Border Initiative (SBI) Tactical Infrastructure (TI) Program to develop and install fencing (pedestrian and vehicle), roads, and lighting solutions along the Southwest Border.
In order to enhance efficiencies and improve program performance, CBP functionally separated
TI from SBInet in October 2007.
Prior to that separation, SBI TI was managed as a component of SBInet.
While SBI TI is managed independently, its funding remains consolidated under the BSFIT account.
Fence completed as of August 8, 2008:― 184.8 miles of Pedestrian Fence on Southwest Border
―
Under construction 56.2―
Awarded 92.3―
To be Awarded 89.0― 154.3 miles of Vehicle Fence on Southwest Border
―
Under construction 2.3―
Awarded 22.8―
To be Awarded 126.3
SBI TI to complete 669.5 total miles of fence by December 31, 2008 :― 366.1 total miles of Pedestrian Fence on Southwest Border ―
303.4 total miles of Vehicle Fence on Southwest Border
005832
3
Program Management
SBI TI broke down the goal of 670 fence miles into 118 fence segments (projects) to complete by 31 Dec 2008
–
Grouped by Border Patrol Sector (8 are receiving fence)
SBI TI/USACE awarded a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) to create a pool of contractors pre-qualified to bid for each segment.
CBP obtains real estate through a MOA authorizing USACE to act on behalf of DHS-CBP
Environmental processes include conducting environmental surveys, using existing EAs, or preparing Environmental Stewardship Plans (ESPs) under S1 Waiver
Long lead construction materials (steel and mesh) are Government Furnished Materials (GFM); a supply and supply chain management Task Order awarded to Boeing is used to manage and execute the process
–
Resulting in potential savings of
005833
(b) (4)
4
Project Management FY09 and Beyond
SBI TI is reorganizing to become a DHS Level I Investment Program consisting of a portfolio of multiple DHS Investment Levels.
Level of project review and milestone decision authority determined by DHS policy based on the portfolio sum total and the investment level of each project within the portfolio.
Program:
Level I:
ARB
Reviews and Approves/JRC Reviews
Projects:
Level I:
ARB Reviews and Approves/JRC Reviews
Level II: ARB Reviews and Approves
Level III: CBP Head approves
SBI TI will request IRB approval for execution of the entire program as well as approval of milestones for individual DHS Level I and II projects within the program.
•
Working level approval received; requires further discussion within CBP
Milestone decision authority and milestone approval for all other projects within the portfolio will be delegated as recommended above.
•
Consistent with DHS Investment Management Handbook, draft, dated
July 2008
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 45/27/2010
005834
5
Project Management FY09 and Beyond
Pre-Acq Acquisition Phases Sustainment
# Project NameTactical Infrastructure
DescriptionQuantity(Miles)
Pre Acquisition (Initiation)
Concept and Technology
Development
Capability Development and
DemonstrationProduction and
DeploymentOperations and
Support
1
Pedestrian Fence
Construction of 370 miles of Pedestrian Fence along areas experiencing significant illegal
cross-border activities and traffic.
366.3
2
Vehicle Fence
Construction of 300 miles of Vehicle Fence along areas
experiencing significant illegal cross-border activities and traffic.
303.4
3
Laredo Cane
Removal of Carrizo cane along Rio Grande River in Laredo, TX to
deter illegal activity and provide line of sight to river for Border
Patrol Agents.
16.1
4San Diego Border
Infrastructure System (BIS)
Construction of 3.5 miles of Border Infrastructure System (BIS) and associated site improvements in
the Smuggler’s Gulch and Border Field State Park areas.
14.0
5Douglas
International Ditch
Construction of 1.3 miles of erosion-control channel, fence,
lighting, and patrol roads in Arizona.
1.3
PROGRAM: Tactical Infrastructure Program COMPONENT: Customs and Border Protection (Office of the Commissioner)
Life Cycle Phase: Mixed
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 55/27/2010
005835
65/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 6
FY08 is Performance driven program
Cost: Threshold - (8% above Objective) (procurement cost)
Objective - (procurement cost. Does not include patrol roads and lighting)(O&M assumptions and cost estimate are being updated.)
Schedule: Threshold – Substantially Under construction by 31 Dec 2008Objective – 670 Fence Miles by 31 Dec 2008
Performance: Threshold/Objective – 670 Fence Miles
Persistent Impedance KPPs: 1. Ability to stop 10,000lbs vehicle traveling at 40 mph.2. Cannot cut 12” x 12” in 30 minutes.3. Not easily climbed over or penetrated by a pedestrian
Acquisition Program Baseline
OBP Assessed Fence Designs as Operationally Effective
005836
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
PF225 Design & Construction
Supply Chain Management
Fence Design IPT
System Development& Demonstration
VF300 Fence Construction
As of 1 Aug 2008
SBI Tactical Infrastructure Master Schedule
VF300 Design & Construction
Kick-off
PF70 Design & Construction
Contract AwardInitial Phase StartJuly 2007
COMPLETEDFence LabFinal Report
Continuing Deliveries to Support PF225 Construction
AWD
COMPLETEDValue EngineeringReport Completed
Legacy Fence Construction
Kickoff
Kickoff
Primary Phase Kickoff
PF 70 Fence Construction
PF 225 Fence Construction
005837
85/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 8
SBI TI Budget ($K)
*Supporting previously constructed fence
CarryoverFY 06 FY 07 FY 07 FY 08 Total Total TISuppl. BSFIT BSFIT Enacted Budget TI Current Projected Actual Actual Projected Projected FY06-FY08 Projection Deficit
Pedestrian Fence (PF)HidalgoPF 225PF 70 (3)
Vehicle Fence (VF)VF 300
Other TISan Diego BIS (3)Other
Subtotal
O&M
TOTAL
005838
(b) (4)
9
Current Program Cost
For FY08, SBI TI identified 118 fence segments (projects) to meet the goal of 670 fence miles by 31 Dec 2008
–
Grouped into the 8 Border Patrol Sectors receiving fence
SBI TI/USACE awarded an Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) to create a pool of contractors pre qualified to bid for each segment.
–
An initial ROM Program-Level Cost Estimate to include all segments was produced in Mar 2007 to identify initial budget inputs
–
USACE develops and issues RFPs, MATOC contractors/USACE/CBP walk
each segment as part of Bidder’s Conference and contractors submit their bid with Actual Pricing.
–
USACE District Offices (LA, Galveston, ABQ) prepare an IGCE (With Current cost ) just prior to Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and award each segment contract to the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable bid
–
Cost Estimate to complete projects will be reassessed after all segment bids are received in September.
•
Variations to costs after bids are received are possible due to contract modifications resulting from required mitigations on found cultural sites and construction delays due to delays in real estate and extreme weather conditions.
005839
10
BSFIT Additional Fence Funding Needed
Original Unfunded Fence Needs EstimateUTB reductionApproved for award below average cost/mileUnfunded Fence Needs (as of 8/11/08)
TI Baseline Funding Available
Immediate Actions Not Requiring a Reprogrammi
Realign Technology Funding within BSFIT Tactical Infrastructure (TI) Realignment
Subtotal of Actions Not Requiring Reprogramming
Reprogram within BSFIT across PPAs:
Operations & Maintenance Program Management Office
Subtotal Reprogramming Amount
Transfers (maximum ):
Fiscal Year 2007 S&E Lapse Balance Fiscal Year 2006/07 Supp Lapse Balance Border Patrol S&E Support Funding Container Security Initiative
Subtotal of Transfers
Total Funds Identified for Border Fencing
Balance Needed for Border Fencing
($millions)Need for Additional Fence Funding
005840
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
11
Current Program Cost (cont.)
Variable costs (e.g. fuel, labor, commodities) have risen over time since original program-level cost estimate
–
Initial budget matched baseline schedule and ROM cost estimate–
Proposals received in May and early June 08 were below ROM–
Proposals received later in June 08 were slightly above ROM–
Proposals received in late June and early Jul 08 were significantly above ROM–
Proposals received in August were below the revised estimate of per mile (not including Hidalgo)
–
Remaining proposals for PF will be submitted by the end of August•
11 proposals –
43.17 miles–
The one proposal received for FV was 50% of the revised estimate
of per mile
•
19 proposals –
126.07 miles
005841
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
12
Current Program Cost (cont.)
•Upon receiving significantly higher then budgeted cost proposals from the MATOC’s, SBI TI and USACE paused and entered into analysis to identify cost drivers and look for potential reductions
–
Fuel
-
63% Increase–
Labor –
15% Increase–
Local market conditions –
Cement –
33% Increase–
Steel –
37% increase–
Schedule compression –
5-20% Increase–
Transportation•
These estimations came from USACoE Millitary
Program
• Current escalation is approximated at over budget
005842
(b) (4)
13
Out Year Program Cost
OBP provided projects for FY09 based upon Operational Requirements Based Budget Program (ORBBP)
–
RGV Gates –
Helipads –
Lighting –
Roads (all weather and drag) –
Bridges
For FY09, SBI TI working with USACE and Tecolote to produce engineering cost estimates and an IGCE for each future project within the SBI TI Program.
Available funding and OBP prioritization will determine the final projects for execution.
Multiple planning and budgeting steps–
Initial IGCE for review and reprioritization with OBP–
Follow on Engineering Cost Estimate (higher fidelity) for final planning and budgeting
005843
14
Fence Lab evaluated 9 designs in a “laboratory” environment
Texas Dept of Transportation Facility: Texas Test Institute (TTI)
Border Patrol identified designs based upon existing fence
Boeing as Fence Lab contractor identified additional COTS designs
Performed Developmental Testing including vehicle ramming, fence
cutting, climbing, and digging
Fence Lab results passed to SBI-TI Fence Design IPT to conduct trades, iterate designs, and document final fence designs.
IPT members included Border Patrol and Value Engineers to ensure
fence designs are operationally effective and reasonably priced
Trades based upon operational and engineering experience
SBI-TI Fence Design IPT produced final designs and Fence “Toolbox”
Documents fence designs presently being deployed
No further physical testing beyond Fence Lab was conducted
Fence designs tested during Fence Lab to meet persistent impedance KPPs.
System Development & Demonstration Phase
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 145/27/2010OBP Assessed Fence Designs as Operationally Effective
005844
15
Program Documentation
The SBI TI program documentation is a tailored package of lifecycle management documents presently being created or updated.
Mission Needs Statement (MNS)
Analysis of Alternatives (AOA)
Operational Requirements Document (ORD)
Acquisition Program Baseline (APB)
Program Lifecycle Cost Estimate (PLCCE)
Program Management Plan (PMP)
Risk Management Plan (RMP)
Integrated Logistics Support Plan (ILSP)
Acquisition Plan
Planned submission of drafts to CBP is 30 September 2008
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 155/27/2010
005845
MNS
AoA
ORD
APB
PLCCE
PMP
RMP
ILSPAs of 1 Aug 2008
SBI TI Program Draft Documentation Schedule
Aug 08 Sep 083rd week 4th week 1st week 2nd week 3rd week 4th week
005846
17
SBI Program Risk
The SBI TI PMO has a Risk Management Program that employs processes, a risk item tracking data base (RiskNav) which is a risk tracking tool , and best practices to identify
and resolve risks
Cost and Schedule are biggest risk areas: –
Cost risk of managing MATOC contract costs–
Schedule risk of managing compressed construction time lines–
Cost and Schedule risk of navigating process to obtain real estate (e.g. Federal judge determines court dates)
–
Schedule risk due to weather (i.e. 30 Nov is end of Hurricane Season)
Mitigation includes:–
Pre-qualification of contractors to ensure ability to perform–
Cultural & Biological surveys and environmental stewardship to identify sensitive areas–
Establish supply chain to availability of materials and control cost–
Moved from design-build to design-bid-build–
Incorporated Lessons learned from PF70
17For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 5/27/2010
005847
18
Conclusions
Issues identified and addressed:
Development of SBI TI APB–
Clarified Scope–
Provided program definition–
Identified KPPs–
Identified current and outyear
cost issues
Address FY08 Funding Situation
Addressed Performance of Fence Types
18For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 5/27/2010
005848
195/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 19
Background SlidesSBI Tactical Infrastructure
005849
205/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 20
Mission Needs Statement
Mission Need
Provide persistent impedance to illegal cross-border activity
Provide time for agents and officers to respond
The mission needs for TI were captured as a part of the original SBInet Mission Needs Statement (MNS).
SBI TI recognizes the need for a separate TI MNS and is undertaking an effort to develop this document.
005850
215/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 21
Operational Requirements
Operational requirements for TI were captured as a part of the overall SBInet ORD. The relevant excerpt from that document is included below.
“Tactical Infrastructure such as fences, vehicle barriers, lighting, bridges, checkpoints, forward operating bases and road improvements greatly enhance the effectiveness and response time of agents by physically preventing or slowing crossing activity, channeling illegal flows to enforcement zones, illuminating crossing points and improving agent freedom of movement…These assets are strategically deployed through the various southwest border sectors. The constructions makeup of these assets also varies from one location to the next as most are adapted to meet the area’s specific needs.”
SBI TI recognizes the need for a separate TI ORD and is undertaking an effort to develop this document.
005851
22
Roadmap to Portfolio Approach
Current SBI TI acquisition documentation will be reworked for review and approval to be applied at the portfolio level
Each project within the SBI TI portfolio will have a tailored acquisition documentation package suitable and scaled to its level of investment and will be subject to the direction of the corresponding milestone decision authority
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 225/27/2010
005852
23
SBI TI Budget
• SBI TI Budget based upon ROM cost estimates –
Cost variables presently going up
Fluctuating cost of raw materials
Threat activity
Real estate acquisition
Environmental mitigations
Lack of experience with river and mountain construction
Local market conditions (Texas)
• FY09 Budget has for additional TI construction–
Roads–
Lights
• FY09 Budget has for O&M for TI
• Segment IGEs and contractor bids coming in above original planning ROMS–
Presently coordinating budget shortfall–
Strategies to close shortfall:•
Internal CBP emergency reprogramming (must be approved by Hill)•
Other DHS Agencies may contribute FY08 funding•
Authority in FY09 CR to spend FY09 SBI TI budget early in Oct.
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 235/27/2010
005853
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
245/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 24
TI Baseline Milestone Schedule
*Baseline schedule impacted by funding and court decisions*RGV Impacted. Will reformat for readability
005854
25
150
170
190
210
230
250
270
290
310
330
350
370
390
12/28/2007 1/28/2008 2/28/2008 3/28/2008 4/28/2008 5/28/2008 6/28/2008 7/28/2008 8/28/2008 9/28/2008 10/28/2008 11/28/2008 12/28/2008
PF Planned PF Actual PF Goal PF Milestones PF Milestones Complete
Construction Complete
All ESPs Complete
Contingency Decision Date
All T.O.s Aw arded
Real Estate
Certif iedWaiver Signed
All Condemnation Filings Started
Baseline Path to 366.3 Miles of Pedestrian Fencing
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 255/27/2010
•ESPs completed except:• D-5b/D-6 within DHS CBP staffing• A-1 awaiting final approval
1 Aug @ 184.2 miles
005855
26
Path to 303.4 Miles of Vehicle Fencing
* “Actual”
: Total miles of vehicle fence (VF) completed, includes miles completed to date under VF300 and legacy VF.
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 265/27/2010
ESP Status: • Draft ESPs presently being completed and submitted• Expect Approval of ESPs by early Sep 08
1 2 0
1 4 0
1 6 0
1 8 0
2 0 0
2 2 0
2 4 0
2 6 0
2 8 0
3 0 0
3 2 0
12 /2 8 /2 00 7 1 /2 8 /2 00 8 2 /2 8 /2 00 8 3 /2 8 /20 08 4 /2 8 /2 0 08 5 /2 8 /2 00 8 6 /28 /20 0 8 7 /2 8 /20 08 8 /28 /20 08 9 /2 8 /20 08 10 /2 8 /2 00 8 11 /28 /20 0 8 12 /28 /20 0 8
VF-300 Planned VF-300 Goal VF-300 Actual VF-300 Milestones VF-300 Milestones Complete
Real Estate
Certif iedWaiver Signed
Contingency Decision CompleteAll RFPs
Issued
All ESPs Complete
Construction Complete
All Task Orders
Aw arded
005856
27
Fence Completed as of August 1, 2008
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 275/27/2010
PF VF Total
Fence required by December 2008 366.3 303.4 669.7
Fence completed (as of 8/01/08) -184.2 -153.8 -338.0
Planned conversion of VF to PF 0.0 11.9 11.9
Remaining to be built 182.1 161.5 343.6
005857
28
Project Health – Risk Rating as of August 12, 2008
Fence completion date later than 12/15/08Fence completion date 12/1/08 through 12/15/08Fence Complete prior to 12/08
VF Risk Rating
PF Risk RatingBased on comprehensive evaluation of project status
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 285/27/2010
Status of Core PF225 and VF300 Projects
# ProjectsStatus PF VF Total
Low Risk (Green) 6 26 32Medium Risk (Yellow) 27 1 28High Risk (Red) 34 2 36
Totals 67 29 96
005858
29
Program Management Plan
As the TI Program was previously a part of the SBInet program it had been covered under that Program Management Plan
SBI TI has a draft Project Management Plan for PF 225 only
SBI TI recognizes the need for a consolidated Program Management Plan and is undertaking an effort to develop this document
29For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 5/27/2010
005859
305/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 30
Test & Evaluation Completed
CBP conducted developmental testing and evaluation at the fence lab that included studies, modeling and simulation, and prototype testing.
Prototype testing was conducted in a field environment to understand deterrence capabilities and create the fence “tool box.”
Operational testing and evaluation captured through deployment.
Sector data collection on attempted breaches
Data will be analyzed to:
Define repair approach
Determine design upgrade requirements
005860
31
Risk Management Plan
The SBI TI PMO has a Risk Management Program that employs processes, tools and best practices to identify, track and resolve risks
The SBI-TI Risk Manager administers the SBI-TI Risk Management Plan and Risk Management Program
One of the significant mitigation activities of the program is the pre-qualification of contractors to ensure the selected contractor will be able to perform and build fence segments successfully
As the programs mature, lessons learned will be captured and incorporated to ensure continuous program improvement
31For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 5/27/2010
005861
325/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 32
Lifecycle Cost Estimate (LCCE)
A LCCE was previously created for the TI program and is currently being updated to reflect current program requirements
Independent government cost estimates are prepared for each segment to prepare for contract award
Reflects more accurate procurement cost
MATOC bids further refine procurement cost
Low price-technically acceptable contract approach limits government cost risk
For fence, O&M lifecycle cost will be calculated and refined as using assumptions developed with OBP
Cost estimating is complicated by assumptions such as:
Fluctuating cost of raw materials
Threat activity
Real estate acquisition
Environmental mitigations
005862
33
O & M Lifecycle Costs
•
O&M Life Cycle Costs based upon assumption of breaches agreed to by OBP
–
Will continue to validate the assumptions and update our estimates
–
Possibly 3-5 years and across the four seasons
–
O&M Cost Estimate for FY09 is •
Out years will be adjusted based on threat activity and level of
repair required
–
Distribution of funding and maintenance concept are TBD•
Dependent upon:–
Frequency of breach and associated damage–
Skill set required to repair–
Maximum acceptable repair time
33For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 5/27/2010
005863
(b) (4)
34
Integrated Logistics Support Plan (ILSP)
The SBI TI Integrated Logistics Support Management Team is working on an ILSP
Level of support required will be based on the assumptions developed in collaboration with OBP for the major TI assets.
Fence
Roads
Cane
Lights
Bridges
ILSP will be created and documented to support capitalization of PF and VF segments
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 345/27/2010
005864
35
SBInet Acquisition Program Baseline(s)
“Blocks” describe the time-phased configurations/deliveries of the SBInet System, and include—
–
Allocated operational requirements, or agreed-to functional capabilities statements–
An engineering/technical configuration, ie, system design, config items, software release(s), performance
–
A program of work, ie, a description of major events, accomplishments, and tasks (IMP)–
A quantified deployment (production) plan, ie, laydown(s) configured over geographical area(s)–
Cost and
schedule estimates, an allocated budget, and assigned personnel
(Orgs, IPTs)Additionally, Blocks may be developed, delivered incrementally as well, for example “1.x Dot” builds
–
Block 1.0 is the initial SBInet delivery to TUS-1, AJO-1–
Block 1.1 incorporates new software functionality (useability
enhancements, laser illuminator)
–
Block 1.2 incorporates new hi-speed wireless comms for Mobile COP implementation–
“Dot”
builds must be synchronized with the operator’s ability to stand-down for installation and training for new equipment and applications
Blocks are essentially mini-programs; appropriate forSBInet formal scope, schedule, and budget baselines
(APBs)
005865
365/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 36
Tactical Infrastructure
What is it?Tactical Infrastructure (TI) is a term used by CBP to describe physical components that help secure our borders, such as lighting, roads, pedestrian and
vehicle fencing.
Why do we use fence? Installation of fence has proven to be a persistent impedance to
illegal cross-border activity, slowing, redirecting, and deterring illegal entries in
areas where personnel and technology alone cannot sufficiently secure our border.
Where does it go? Proposed fence locations are determined through operational assessments made by the local Border Patrol Agents and Chiefs, based on illegal cross-border activity and the Border Patrol’s extensive field experience in these areas. The primary objective in targeting certain areas is to provide an additional security measure in areas experiencing significant illegal cross-border activities and traffic.
Other considerations?Three main factors contribute to fence location decisions in addition to the initial Border Patrol operational assessments: (1) engineering assessments, which included construction costs; (2) environmental analyses; and (3) input from stakeholders. Each of these steps is a standard element of the planning process that enables DHS to make informed decisions in deploying a fence as operationally required.
005866
37
PF225 Project Schedule Forecast
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 375/27/2010
Sector Project MilesReal Estate
CertifiedAward
T.O.Fence
Complete R/Y/G StatusSan Diego A-1 3.6 5/30/2008 5/27/2008 5/6/2009 Awarded
San Diego A-2A 0.8 7/11/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2B 0.5 7/11/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2C 0.5 8/18/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2D 0.8 8/18/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2E 0.2 8/18/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2F 1.1 6/27/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2G 0.4 6/2/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2H 0.2 6/2/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2I 1.1 8/18/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2J 0.1 8/18/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2K 1.7 8/18/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2L 2.1 8/18/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2M 0.1 7/11/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
San Diego A-2N 1.5 7/11/2008 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
El Centro B-4 8.7 5/9/2008 5/8/2008 12/3/2008 Under Construction
El Centro B-5B 2.9 4/21/2008 5/8/2008 12/1/2008 Under Construction
Yuma C-1 10.4 4/30/2008 5/8/2008 12/1/2008 Under Construction
Yuma C-2B 3.8 4/28/2008 5/8/2008 9/18/2008 Under Construction
Tucson D-2 5.1 9/28/2007 9/21/2007 8/1/2008 Complete
Tucson D-5A 2.1 9/28/2007 9/28/2007 3/13/2008 Complete
Tucson D-5B 5.3 8/29/2008 7/7/2008 12/1/2008 Awarded
Tucson D-6 2.2 8/29/2008 7/7/2008 12/21/2008 Awarded
54.8Italics = Planned date
Subtotal Mileage
005867
38
PF225 Project Schedule Forecast
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 385/27/2010
Sector Project MilesReal Estate
Certified Award T.O.Fence
Complete R/Y/G StatusTucson E-2A 6.1 4/30/2008 6/26/2008 12/1/2008 Under Construction
Tucson E-2B 6.9 9/12/2007 8/20/2007 3/28/2008 Complete
Tucson E-3 4.3 9/24/2007 9/24/2007 8/1/2008 Complete
Tucson F-1 1.0 5/6/2008 5/16/2008 10/14/2008 Under Construction
El Paso I-1A 2.8 8/17/2007 9/28/2007 8/8/2008 Under Construction
El Paso J-1 2.2 7/17/2007 9/28/2007 5/9/2008 Complete
El Paso J-2 3.5 1/15/2008 6/18/2008 10/26/2008 Awarded
El Paso J-3 1.1 7/17/2007 9/28/2007 5/16/2008 Complete
El Paso K-1A 1.07 1/21/2008 TBD TBDEl Paso K-1C 1.3 1/21/2008 TBD TBDEl Paso K-2A 9.6 6/30/2008 7/2/2008 12/16/2008 Under Construction
El Paso K-2B* 2.3 8/29/2008 7/8/2008 12/23/2008 Awarded
El Paso K-2C* 7.2 8/29/2008 TBD TBDEl Paso K-2D* 9.6 8/29/2008 TBD TBDEl Paso K-3* 9.0 6/30/2008 6/27/2008 11/15/2008 Awarded
El Paso K-5 5.2 6/30/2008 TBD TBDMarfa L-1 4.5 10/5/2007 TBD TBD
Del Rio M-1 2.2 7/14/2008 7/3/2008 10/27/2008 Awarded
Del Rio M-2A 0.8 8/22/2008 TBD TBDDel Rio M-2B 1.0 7/7/2008 7/8/2008 12/29/2008 Awarded
81.7Italics = Planned date
Subtotal Mileage
005868
39
PF225 Project Schedule Forecast
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 395/27/2010
Sector Project MilesReal Estate
CertifiedAward
T.O.Fence
Complete R/Y/G StatusRio Grande Valley O-1 3.7 7/28/2008 TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-2 8.7 7/28/2008 TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-3 2.0 7/28/2008 TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-4A 4.5 - TBD 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-4B 0.1 - TBD 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-5 1.8 - 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Under Construction
Rio Grande Valley O-6A 2.6 - TBD 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-6B/C 1.4 - TBD 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-7 0.9 - 7/8/2008 12/1/2008 Under Construction
Rio Grande Valley O-8 3.3 - 7/7/2008 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-9A 2.1 - 7/8/2008 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-9B 1.7 - TBD 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-10 2.4 - 7/15/2008 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-10 ext 0.3 - TBD 12/1/2008Rio Grande Valley O-11 2.3 TBD TBD TBD On Hold
Rio Grande Valley O-12 1.0 8/28/2008 TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-13 1.6 7/28/2008 TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-14 3.6 7/28/2008 TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-15 2.2 TBD TBD TBD On Hold
Rio Grande Valley O-16 2.1 8/28/2008 TBD TBD On Hold
Rio Grande Valley O-17 1.6 TBD TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-18 3.6 TBD TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-19 3.4 TBD TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-20 0.9 7/28/2008 TBD TBDRio Grande Valley O-21 13.0 TBD TBD TBD
70.8207.225.2
184.9366.9
* The 207.2 planned miles under PF225, along with actual baseline miles (78.4 mi) and PF70 actual constructed miles (80.7 mi), will yield approximately 366 total miles of PF once construction on all planned miles is complete.
PF 225 Constructed8/1 Total Constructed PF
Total End State PF CY08
Italics = Planned date
Subtotal MileageTotal PF225 Mileage*
005869
40
VF300 Project Schedule Forecast
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 405/27/2010
Sector Project MilesReal Estate
CertifiedAward
T.O.Fence
Complete R/Y/G StatusEl Centro BV-1 6.5 6/13/2008 TBD 12/18/2008Yuma CV-1a 5.0 4/30/2008 TBD 12/17/2008Yuma CV-1b 8.0 4/30/2008 TBD 12/21/2008Yuma CV-2 9.0 - TBD 12/22/2008Yuma CV-3 22.5 1/1/2007 8/1/2007 11/13/2008 Under Construction
Tucson DV-1 13.0 1/1/2007 8/20/2007 1/28/2008 Complete
Tucson DV-2 1.5 12/31/2007 TBD 12/3/2008Tucson DV-3 11.1 12/31/2007 TBD 12/1/2008Tucson DV-4a&c 20.5 12/31/2007 7/10/2008 12/17/2008 Awarded
Tucson DV-4b 10.7 12/31/2007 N/A 5/30/2008 Complete
Tucson DV-5b 1.0 8/12/2008 TBD 12/3/2008Tucson EV-1a 11.1 7/1/2007 N/A 4/25/2008 Complete
Tucson EV-1b 2.8 8/20/2008 TBD 12/4/2008Tucson FV-1a 3.2 12/31/2007 N/A 6/20/2008 Complete
Tucson FV-1b 16.4 8/15/2008 TBD 12/14/2008142.2Subtotal Mileage
Italics = Planned date
005870
41
VF300 Project Schedule Forecast
*The 229.1 miles associated with VF300, along with mileage completed prior to July 2007 will allow us to achieve our goal of 300 miles by the end of CY08.
For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 415/27/2010
Sector Project MilesReal Estate
CertifiedAward
T.O.Fence
Complete R/Y/G StatusEl Paso HV-1 3.8 10/16/2008 TBD 12/31/2008El Paso HV-2 6.7 10/16/2008 TBD 12/30/2008El Paso HV-3 5.8 10/16/2008 TBD 1/2/2009El Paso HV-4 6.0 9/24/2008 TBD 1/1/2009El Paso IV-2 12.8 5/21/2008 TBD 1/4/2009El Paso IV-4A 3.7 1/1/2007 N/A 6/20/2008 Complete
El Paso IV-4B 2.0 1/1/2007 TBD 12/17/2008El Paso JV-1A 9.3 5/21/2008 TBD 12/28/2008El Paso JV-1B 8.9 4/23/2008 TBD 12/28/2008El Paso JV-2 11.9 4/23/2008 TBD 12/30/2008El Paso JV-3 10.0 4/23/2008 TBD 1/2/2009El Paso KV-1 0.0 5/21/2008 N/A 5/15/2008 Complete
80.9223.161.5153.8-11.9303.4
* Includes some fence that will be retro-fitted to PF & later subtracted out. Some retro-fit/conversion has already occurred
VF 300 Constructed
Total End State VF CY08*
Subtotal MileageTotal Mileage
Italics = Planned date
8/1 Total Constructed VF
005871
425/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 42
Analysis of Alternatives
The Border Patrol has conducted comprehensive analyses of alternatives (AOAs) to determine which areas along the border would most benefit from fencing and which type of fencing would be most appropriate for each identified segment. The primary objective in targeting certain areas is to provide an additional security measure in areas experiencing significant illegal cross border activities and traffic.
Other SBI TI projects will conduct A0As consistent and scaled with their individual DHS Level of Investment.
005872
43
PF225 Real Estate – Timeline As of August 5, 2008
PF225 MILESTONE SUMMARY:Planned
Complete Date
Revised Estimate Date Complete Milestone Status
5/1/2008 N/A 5/1/2008 Complete legal definitions for fee acquisitions
5/29/2008 Release all Value Letters 3 Letters left to release to Known Owners o Pending appraisals for properties valued over (1 on A-2D due NLT 08/08; 2 on K-2C due NLT 08/08)
(Substantially Complete)
Currently Value Letters released to 359 of 362 Known Owners (99%)
Special Cases: (Value Letters counted as released) ** 5 ROE-C's signed; Certified to Construct, Value Letters follow once appraisals complete - (3 on L-1A & B, 1 on A-1, 1 on A-2J) Of 370 total owners, 8 are Unknown – will not receive Value Letters; will move straight to condemnation.
Commence relocation process (DRT - Del Rio Sector began 5/16) (RGV - Rio Grande Sector began 8/1)Complete negotiations & mail condemnation notification letters
14 Negotiations Remain:
o 3 Negotiations pending Appraisals as noted above6/13/2008 7/29/2008 (224 of 315 expected
Condemnations are filed) Execute offers to sell (Purchase) OR file condemnation cases Of 370 Total Acquisitions: 50 Purchases / no Title Issues 5 Signed ROE-C's 315 Expected Condemnation Actions
Of Remaining 91 Condemnation Cases not yet filed: 14 Negotiations Remain 28 Packages being assembled & reviewed by USACE 29 in DOJ/CBP Legal Review 14 Completed Legal Review, Await USACE Certification to be signed by CBP 6 with DOJ not yet Filed in District Court
8/1/2008 Goal for gaining possession to all required real estate
44 Possessions out of 224 Condemnations Filed
8/16/2008 DRT Relocations to complete by 11/1; no impact to construction schedule. RGV Relocations to complete by late November -may arrange temporary living arrangements to expedite reloction
Complete relocation process, where applicable
8/28/2008 9/15 for Cases outside RGV & Friendly Cases in RGV 10/15 for Adverse Cases in RGV
Late finish date for gaining possession to real estate
5/15/2008 N/A
N/A
5/30/2008
5/16/2008
348 OF 362 Negotiations with Known Owners Complete (96%)
5/16/2008 9 total in DRT: 4 Owners & 5 Tenants 4 total in RGV
(14 Exceptions: 11 negotiations to close btwn 8/8 & 8/22. 3 Negotiations awaiting appraisals to begin)
08/05/08 (Substantially
Complete) o 11 open Negotiations for Special Situations (Cantu, Eagle Pass, UT-B, K-2C owners, etc.); (Due closed between 8/8 & 8/22)
005873
(b) (4)
44
Real Estate – Status as of August 4, 2008
PROPERTY SUMMARY PFHidalgo Project – Access/Staging
(O-4 thru O-10) VF Total
Non-Federal Acquisitions * (# of Acquisitions > # of Owners) 370 10 14 394
California 42 3 45
Arizona 21 7 28
New Mexico 1 4 5
Texas 306 10 0 316
PROPERTY ACCESS
Voluntarily signed Rights of Entry (ROE's) of Above Cited Non-Fed Owners 309 8 12 329
Court issued order of possession 61 2 1 64
PROPERTY ACQUISITIONValue Letters released; out of 362 Actions for PF ( Other 8 actions for owners listed as Unknown; No Value Letter – Straight to Condemnation) 359 9 3 371
Offers to Sell voluntarily signed **May yet require condemnation to clear title 202 9 2 213
Voluntary Sales Executed (Title acceptable; no Condemnation) 50 0 0 50
Condemnation Notification Letters mailed 293 9 3 305
Condemnation Packages Submitted by COE for DOJ & CBP legal review 273 9 3 285
Total Condemnation Packages awaiting DOJ & CBP Legal Review - 29 - 5 - 0 - 34
- Condemnation Packages Pending DOJ Legal Review 29 5 0 34
- Condemnation Packages Pending CBP Legal Review 7 0 0 7
- CBP/DOJ Legal Review Complete; Pending COE Final Legal Certification - 14 - 0 - 0 - 14
Condemnation Packages Signed by CBP; at DOJ to be Filed =230 = 4 = 3 = 237
- Condemnation Packages with DOJ not yet Filed in District Court - 6 - 0 - 0 - 6Condemnation Cases Filed in District Court by AUSA = 224 = 4 = 3 =231
Possession via Court Order or Negotiated Settlement 44 1 2 47* In Texas, 9 Landowners (7 on PF, 2 on Hidalgo) own more than one property being purchased or condemned as separate actions.
005874
45
VF300 MILESTONE SUMMARY:
Planned Complete
Date
Revised Estimate
Date Complete Milestone Status
5/23/2008 N/A 5/23/2008 Complete all legal definitions for fee acquisitions
6/23/2008 N/A5/23/2008
(Substantially Complete)
Release all Value Letters (12 Non-Federal Owners, excluding Cocopah & T.O.N.)
Deferring Value Letters; no time to survey/appraise access roads - Using ROE for Construction to permit use - will negotiate for easement once survey and appraisal are complete.
6/30/2008 8/15/2008Execute Rights of Entry for Construction (ROE-C) (2 of 9 Signed)
USACE in process of drafting ROE-C's & scheduling meetings with landowners. High probability of getting voluntary signatures…need to solidify access road selection & define in the document.
7/5/2008 N/A6/10/2008
(Substantially Complete)
Complete negotiations & mail condemnation notification letters
Negotiations deferred pending surveys & appraisals; 3 Condemnations Letters sent to owners to clear title on BV-1.
7/31/2008 9/1/2001Execute offers to sell (Purchase) OR file condemnation cases
3 Condemnations for Segment BV-1 filed; 2 of 3 cases District Court issued an Immediate Order of Possession.
8/28/2008 Goal for gaining possession to all required real estate
9/15/2008 Late finish date for gaining possession to real estate
VF300 Real Estate – Timeline As of July 29, 2008
005875
465/27/2010 For Official Use Only For Official Use Only 46
Waiver Litigation
Waiver Litigation – County of El Paso, et al. v. Chertoff, No. EP- 08-CA-0196-FM (W.D. Tex. June 2, 2008)
On June 2, 2008. The City and County of El Paso, Texas, joined by several other local government entities, local environmental groups, and the Native American tribe Ysleta del Sure Pueblo, filed suit against DHS in the U.S. District Court Western District of Texas.
The complaint alleges an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power, and a separation of powers claim based upon the Executive’s repeal of laws.
The complaint also alleges a Tenth Amendment challenge based upon the waiver’s inclusion of State and local laws.
On Thursday, June 5, 2008, plaintiffs filed an application for a
preliminary injunction seeking to halt construction in all the Texas project areas identified in the Secretary’s April 3, 2008 waivers.
DHS filed its opposition to the application and a motion to dismiss to dismiss the case with prejudice on June 19, 2008.
On June 20, 2008, the Court issued an order striking plaintiffs’
application for preliminary injunction because plaintiffs exceeded the ten page limitation without seeking the Court’s permission to do so.
On July 7, 2008, plaintiffs filed their brief in support of the application for preliminary injunction and reply to the government’s motion to dismiss.
The government’s response is due on July 21, 2008.
On July 21, 2008, DHS filed their response and are currently waiting upon the Court’s ruling.
No hearing has been scheduled as of August 8, 2008.
005876
47
TI Construction MATOC Awards
Selected Unrestricted Contractors
San Diego/El Centro Sector
Tucson Sector El Paso Sector Yuma Sector Marfa Sector Del Rio Sector RGV Sector Laredo Sector
Kiewit Pacific Co.
Kiewit Western Co.
Twin Mountain Construction II
Kiewit Western Co.
Kiewit Texas Construction
Kiewit Texas Construction
Kiewit Texas Construction
Kiewit Texas Construction
Granite Construction
Granite Construction
Granite Construction
Granite Construction
Weston Solutions
Weston Solutions
Weston Solutions
Weston Solutions
Sundt Construction
Sundt Construction Tetra Tech Sundt
Construction ECC ECC ECC ECC
WGI Straub Construction
Weston Solutions
HDR Design- Build Tetra Tech KBR
005877
48
TI Construction MATOC Awards
Selected Small Business Contractors
San Diego/El Centro Sector El Paso Sector Laredo Sector Yuma Sector Tucson Sector Marfa Sector RGV Sector
Candelaria-EPC LLC (JV)
Cerrudo Services
Cerrudo Services Candelaria-EPC LLC (JV)
Candelaria-EPC LLC (JV)
Hallmark Capital Group LLC
Cerrudo Services
Hal Hays Construction
Nova Electric, Inc.
CKY Inc. CJW-MZT, Project 1
Hal Hays Construction
CKY Inc. JACO-MCC (JV)
RMA Land Construction
RMA Land Construction
Hallmark Capital Group, LLC
Hal Hays Construction
Marcon Engineering
Marsh Development
LEC/Amigo (JV)
RMA Land Construction
Reyes Construction
005878
Block 1 APB – Baselined Parameters005879
(b) (5)