1
Scaling in the Microworld
Dr. Thara SrinivasanLecture 6
Picture credit: Irene Tsai, MITPolymer thin film after electric field and reactive ion etching, 200x
2
Lecture Outline
• Reading• From reader: W.S.N Trimmer,
“Microrobots and Micromechanical Systems,” pp. 267-87.
• H. Fujita, “Microactuators and Micromachines,” pp. 1721-32.
• Watch the movie Microcosmos
• Today’s Lecture• Scaling in Nature• Trimmer’s Matrix Notation • Scaling of Forces• Scaling of Mechanical, Electrical,
and Fluidic Systems
Nikon Small World Photo Competition Winners
Marine diatom 160x
Embryo seeds within fruit capsule (25x)
2
3
Scaling• Why is scaling important for MEMS?
• MEMS are often >1000× smaller than macro counterparts.
• We need to develop new intuition of microscale phenomena.
• Otherwise, different scaling of any one property can be a big roadblock!
• Dependence on length scale s• Length [s1] →• Surface area [s2] →• Volume [s3] →
• Constraints on life• Land-based life contends with gravity at large scale,
drying out at small scale.• Water-based life increases range of sizes by evading
gravity and drying out.
8V
4A
2L2
s
3.8 m
20 m
Mite on Sandia microengine
4
Swimming and Flying2
21 AvcF DD ρ=
2
21 AvcF LL ρ=
Ian Thorpe
• Swimming• Mass of muscles ~ [s3]• Drag force FD ~ [s2]• Larger creatures have greater
swimming speed
• Flying is more complex• Mass of muscles ~ [s3]• Weight ~ [s3]• Drag force FD ~ [s2]• Lift force FL ~ [s2]• Larger means faster flight but
more power to keep weight aloft
Dic
kins
on g
roup
, UC
B
3
5
Bug’s Life• Most abundant creatures are 1-2
mm in size.• Walking on water is possible as
surface tension supports small weights, but swimming is not fun.
• Bugs are cold-blooded to manage faster cooling and heating.
• Bugs are not easily injured. • They can lift 10-50× their weight.• They jump roughly as high as
people do!• Work = weight × height• Force ~ muscle mass
Water strider
Antz
Mexican ant, Cornell Integrated Microscopy Center
6
Why Miniaturize?
• Motivation• Batch fabrication, lower cost per device• Less energy, less material consumed, disposable (or better,
recyclable!)• Arrays of sensors possible, minimally invasive• Similar size scale as individual cells• Can take advantage of different scaling laws (e.g., electrostatic
forces)• Breakdown of macroscale laws of physics
• Performance• Integration with circuitry can reduce noise and improve sensitivity• Yield and reliability may be improved, fewer defects per chip
• 106 defects/cm3 → 1 defect for every 106 µm3
4
7
8
Challenges to Miniaturization
• Harder to interface with the macroscopic world • Fragility• Interconnect issues
• Smaller device requires higher sensitivity to sense smaller input• Chemical sensors, accelerometers, gyros
• May need to take into account • Molecular forces (i.e., Brownian motion) • Quantum mechanical effects (i.e., phonons)
5
9
Matrix Notation• Matrix shows dependence on length scale [s] for
different cases in simple format, Trimmer 1989.
[ ][ ]3/ −== ssmFa F
( ) 2/12/1 )/2(/2 Fxmaxt ==
[ ][ ][ ]( ) 2/131 Fssst −=
tFxP /=
=
4
3
2
1
ssss
F
10
Scaling Results
• Scaling of forces• [s1] ~ surface tension,
electrostatic I• [s2] ~ pressure, muscle,
electrostatic II, magnetic I• [s3] ~ gravitational, magnetic II• [s4] ~ magnetic III
=
4
3
2
1
ssss
F
=−
−
1
0
1
2
ssss
a
=
0
5.0
1
5.1
ssss
t
=−
−
2
5.0
1
5.2
ssss
VP
volume forces (s3)
surface forces (s2)
line forces (s1)Microscale ~µm
Mesoscale ~mm
Log Dimension
Log Force
Nanoscale ~nm
Judy
Macroscale ~m
6
11
Power
• Power generated• Force laws with scaling higher than
s2, power generated per volume degrades as scale decreases
=−
−
−
0
5.0
1
5.1
1
1
1
1
4
3
2
1
ssss
ssss
ssss
P
=
5
5.3
2
5.0
ssss
P
=−
−
2
5.0
1
5.2
ssss
VP
MIT
12
Electrostatic Forces
xUF∂∂
−=
20
0
2
21
21
wldEU
EdVdwlC
CVU
ε
ε
=
==
=
• Calculate the force exerted between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor
Fig A6 Trimmer
7
13
Electrostatic Forces
[ ]202
1 wldEx
F∂∂
−= ε
[ ] 22 EsF =
[ ] [ ]05.0 sorsEb−=
[ ] [ ]21 sorsF =
• Two regimes in breakdown field Eb vs. spacing d curve• As d approaches mean free
path λ of insulator molecules, fewer molecules are around to be ionized
14
Magnetic Forces
[ ] [ ] [ ]220 sssJAdAJI ===∫ ⋅= •
[ ]40
2s
dIIF ba ==l
πµ
Fig A1, A2 Trimmer
...2
0 +=dlIIF baπ
µ
• Constant current density ~ [s1]
−
= −
−
0
5.0
1
s
s
sJmagnetic
−
=
4
3
2
s
s
sFmagnetic
8
15
Electrostatic vs. Magnetic Microactuation
• Electrostatics + Generally better scaling at microscale+ Simple actuation with pair of electrodes separated by
insulator+ Voltage switching easier than current switching+ Energy loss through Joule heating is lower+ High-force short-range motion concatenated, as in stepper
motor
• Magnetics+ Absolute forces, displacements larger+ Can operate in harsh environments – Magnetic materials not standard– 3D magnets harder to microfabricate using planar IC
processes– High currents, power dissipation
−
=
4
3
2
s
s
sFmagnetic
−−
=2
1
s
s
F ticelectrosta
16
Electrostatic Actuators
Offenberg et al., Bosch Brosnihan et al.
x
2
22
22 dwlVFand
dwVF yx ∝∝
• Laterally driven resonators• Electrostatic force
proportional to number of comb fingers
• For largest deflection operate at resonant frequency
y
9
17
Surface Tension• Surface tension (γwater ~ 72 mN/m)
• 20 µm hydrophilic channel filled with water, ∆P across meniscus is 12.5 kPa
• Capillary condensation: d ~ 3 nm for 50% humidity
• Surface tension or capillary forces scale with perimeter of wetted area ~ [s1]• Bug (10 mg) needs 1 mm of foot edge to walk on
water• Human (60 kg) would need feet with 8000 m
perimeter
• Implications for MEMS• Release and in-use stiction are major challenges• Can it be harnessed?
+=∆
21
11RR
P γ
[ ][ ][ ]1
21
sFssPAF
=
=∆= −
Fig
18
Surface Tension for Self-Assembly• Use surface tension of liquid polymer and molten metal droplets to
self-assemble hinged MEMS into desired positions.
• γwater = 72 mN/m, γpolystyrene = 39 mN/m at 25°C
• γSn-Bi solder = 319 mN/m at 188°C, γAu = 1070 mN/m at 1200°C, γsodium silicate glass = 286 mN/m at 1000°C
Syms group, Imperial College Bright group, Univ. of Colorado
10
19
Friction• Friction, arising from
• Capillary forces~ [s1]• Adhesive surface forces such
as van der Waals, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic ~ [s2]
• While macroscale contact occurs between few rough protrusions, in MEMS, surfaces may be highly smooth (e.g. SCS) so contact occurs over larger area
• Early micromotors had friction coefficients as high as brake materials on cast iron!
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
100 1000 10 4 10 5
Fric
tion
Coe
ffici
ent
Number of Cycles
µk = 0.23
onset of sticking
µk = 0.02
Friction measurements from Sandia microengine
20
Friction in MEMS
• Friction, the bane of micromotors• Side-drive motors use electrostatic force between edges of poly
rotor and stator, limited by friction to 500 rpm (Fan et al.)• Improvements enabled 15000 rpm, operation for a week.
(Mehregany et al.)• Wobble motor uses rolling instead of sliding motion.
• Use friction for good• Arrays of cilia-like actuators use friction for in-plane conveyance• Friction holds hinged MEMS in place once assembled
• Avoid friction! Suspend!
11
21
Mechanical Strength• Strength-to-weight ratio = area/weight ~ [s-1]• Stiffness ~ [s1]
• MEMS are relatively more stiff than macromechanical systems
3
3
4lEwtkandzkF zzz ==
EIP
x=
∂∂
4
4ζ ( ) gwhPwhIx ρζζ === ,12/, 3
• Deflection under own weight ~ [s2]
[ ]23
4
swh
whl ==ζ
x
22
Resonant Frequency
• Resonant frequency ~ [s-1]• MEMS cantilever 100 × 3 × 0.1 µm3, f0=12 kHz• NEMS cantilever 0.1 × 0.01 × 0.01 µm3, f0=1.2 GHz
mkf
π21
0 =
ρπππE
lt
MlEwt
MlEIf 23
3
30 44213
21
===
3
3lEIk =
12
23
Torque
• Torque• Surface micromachined
electrostatic micromotorsgive pN-m to nN-m torque
• Dissipation to friction is high
• Can only drive small loads, i.e. microshutters
rFrT ×=
θ∂∂
−= er
EF
fTTP πω 2==
24
Electrical Properties
• Electrical resistance ~ [s-1]
• Current ~ [s2]
• Capacitance ~ [s1]
[ ] [ ] [ ]220 sssJAdAJI ===∫ ⋅= •
[ ]1−== sAlRσ
[ ]sdwlC == 0ε
13
25
• The dimensionless Reynolds number Re represents ratio of inertial to viscous forces (drag)• fluid density ρ• object velocity v• characteristic
object length or diameter D
• fluid viscosity µ
Inertia
• Flow regimes • Re<<1: laminar flow, following smooth
streamlines • MEMS regime• Viscous forces dominate and inertial
forces can be neglected• Re < 2300: laminar flow• Re > 2300: turbulent flow, complex
eddies
[ ]2Re svd ==µρ
v = 500 µm/sd = 50 µm
µair = 1 × 10-6 m2/sµwater = 15 × 10-6 m2/s
Reair = 0.0016Rewater = 0.025
26
Reynolds Numbers
turb
ulen
t flo
wla
min
ar fl
ow
• Earth’s tectonic plates 10-23
• Glacier 10-11
• Bacteria in water 10-5
• Marble falling in honey 10-2
• Tropical fish 102
• Ian Thorpe 105
• Car 106
• Airplane 107
• Whale 108
• Implications for MEMS• Squeezed film
damping• Parallel plate flow
damping• Pressure-driven
flow in microchannel
• No turbulence for mixing, only diffusion
[ ]s
ml
PwhQ33
12=
∆=
η
14
27
Mixing at the Microscale
Schulte et al., Micronics
28
Diffusion• Diffusion times (particle and thermal) ~
[s2]• Mixing at microscale mediated only by
diffusion• Time to diffuse over 10 µm million times
faster than over 1 cm• Heat is conducted out of small
structures quickly, so good thermal isolation for microstructures possible
rkTDπη6
=D
x6
2
=τ
Length of cube side x
Time to diffuse x
Volume 1 µL
1 mm
500 s
1 nL
100 µm
5 s
1 pL
10 µm
0.05 s
1 fL
1 µm
0.5 ms
1 aL
100 nm
0.05 ms
Whitesides group
15
29
Microreactors• Leaf model
• Photosynthesis is the world’s most massive chemical operation ~ 300 billion tons of sugar per year (Biomimicry, J. Benyus)
• Heat transfer and mass transfer ~ [s2]• Higher surface area to
volume ratios give microreactors higher yields.
Jensen group, MIT
S. Bohn et al., Physical Review E, June 2002
30
Analytical Sample Size• Scaling of analytical
chemical systems is limited • For a fixed
concentration of target molecules, total number of target molecules in sample is reduced as the sample is miniaturized
• Detector with greater sensitivity needed with a cut-off at detecting a single molecule
Number of molecules in 1 µM solution
Volume 1 µL
6×1011
1 nL
6×108
1 pL
6×105
1 fL
600
1 aL
6
100
103
106
109
1012
1015
1018
1021
10-18 10-15 10-12 10-9 10-6 10-3 100
Volume (L)
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
olec
ules
/mL)
1 Molecule1000 Molecules1000000 Molecules
Region representing concentrations of
less than one molecule
per sample
16
31
Summary
• Miniaturization to microscale • Use forces that scale as [s1]
• Electrostatic forces at small separations• Surface tension
• Don’t fight forces that scale as [s2]• Friction
• Can use [s3] forces, but remember to consider other forces involved