+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Scheduled meals and scheduled palatable snacks synchronize circadian rhythms: Consequences for...

Scheduled meals and scheduled palatable snacks synchronize circadian rhythms: Consequences for...

Date post: 11-Sep-2016
Category:
Upload: carolina-escobar
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
7
Scheduled meals and scheduled palatable snacks synchronize circadian rhythms: Consequences for ingestive behavior Carolina Escobar a, , Roberto Salgado b , Katia Rodriguez a , Aurea Susana Blancas Vázquez a , Manuel Angeles-Castellanos a , Ruud M. Buijs b a Departmento de Anatomía Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, DF CP 04360, Mexico b Departmento de Biología Celular y Fisiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, DF CP 04360, Mexico abstract article info Article history: Received 17 January 2011 Received in revised form 28 April 2011 Accepted 3 May 2011 Keywords: Food entrainment Circadian Metabolic rhythms Food addiction Obesity Food is a potent time signal for the circadian system and has shown to entrain and override temporal signals transmitted by the biological clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which adjusts mainly to the daily light/dark (LD) alternation. Organisms mostly ingest food in their active period and this permits a correct coordination between the LD and the food elicited time signals with the circadian system. Under conditions when feeding opportunities are shifted to the usual resting/sleep phase, the potent entraining force of food, shifts circadian uctuations in several tissues, organs, and brain structures toward meal time, resulting a desynchrony within the body and between the organism and the external LD cycle. The daily scheduled access to a palatable snack exerts similar changes specically to brain areas involved in motivation and reward responses. This review describes the phenomenology of food entrainment and entrainment by a palatable snack. It suggests how scheduled feeding can lead to food addiction and how shifted feeding schedules toward the sleep phase can result in altered ingestive behavior, obesity and disturbed metabolic responses. © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Ingestive behavior is strongly regulated by the circadian system In nature, animals spend several hours daily seeking food and their efciency for feeding determines their survival and reproduction. Feeding behavior strongly depends on circadian cycles because access to food sources varies along the day. Some animals exhibit daily activity cycles aimed at avoiding being preyed upon by their hunters. Likewise hunters have developed daily cycles of activity to be efcient in catching their prey. Thus the capacity to estimate time gives animals the possibility to anticipate the coming feeding opportunity by approaching the right location and to prepare physiological and digestive functions for the expected meal. This results in adaptation to a cycling environment and better opportunities for survival. The daily alternation of feeding/fasting is strongly coupled to the daily cycle of wakefulness and sleep, since animals predominantly eat in their active period. Thus, feeding behavior is strongly regulated by a time keeping system organized by the biological clock, the supra- chiasmatic nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (SCN). This biological clock receives direct light information from the retina and performs daily adjustments of the clock mechanisms to keep internal oscillations coupled to the external cycles [1,2]. The SCN controls and drives circadian rhythms of the body by transmitting temporal signals via neuroendocrine, and autonomic pathways [36]. A complete bilateral lesion of the SCN is known to abolish circadian rhythmicity of the sleepwake cycle and also leads to arrhythmic patterns of the feeding/fasting cycle [7,8]. 2. Feeding schedules are potent entraining signals for circadian rhythms The strong interaction between the circadian system and feeding is reciprocal, since meal time also inuences circadian rhythms. In rodents, limiting food access to two or 3 h and shifting it towards their resting phase (which corresponds to the light phase) modies the temporal organization of behavior [9]. Animals to which food access is scheduled to a few hours during the day develop anticipatory activity preceding the feeding event, at a time when normally they would be sleeping (Fig. 1). Anticipatory activity comprises arousal, increased general activity, exploratory behaviors (Fig. 2), snifng, increased wheel running and increased instrumental behaviors like pressing a lever in a Skinner box to obtain food, or approaching a food source [9,10]. Restricted feeding schedules (RFS) also induce a daily peak of corticosterone [11] and a peak of ghrelin production by the stomach [12,13] while plasma insulin decreases[14] anticipating the daily meal. Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555561 Corresponding author at: Depto. de Anatomía 4° piso Edicio B, Fac de Medicina UNAM, Av Ciudad Universitaria 3000, DF 04360, México. Tel./fax: + 52 5556 232422. E-mail address: [email protected] (C. Escobar). 0031-9384/$ see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.001 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physiology & Behavior journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phb
Transcript

Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555–561

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Physiology & Behavior

j ourna l homepage: www.e lsev ie r.com/ locate /phb

Scheduled meals and scheduled palatable snacks synchronize circadian rhythms:Consequences for ingestive behavior

Carolina Escobar a,⁎, Roberto Salgado b, Katia Rodriguez a, Aurea Susana Blancas Vázquez a,Manuel Angeles-Castellanos a, Ruud M. Buijs b

a Departmento de Anatomía Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, DF CP 04360, Mexicob Departmento de Biología Celular y Fisiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, DF CP 04360, Mexico

⁎ Corresponding author at: Depto. de Anatomía 4° pUNAM, Av Ciudad Universitaria 3000, DF 04360, México

E-mail address: [email protected] (C. Escobar

0031-9384/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Aldoi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.001

a b s t r a c t

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:Received 17 January 2011Received in revised form 28 April 2011Accepted 3 May 2011

Keywords:Food entrainmentCircadianMetabolic rhythmsFood addictionObesity

Food is a potent time signal for the circadian system and has shown to entrain and override temporal signalstransmitted by the biological clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which adjusts mainly to the daily light/dark(LD) alternation. Organisms mostly ingest food in their active period and this permits a correct coordinationbetween the LD and the food elicited time signals with the circadian system. Under conditions when feedingopportunities are shifted to the usual resting/sleep phase, the potent entraining force of food, shifts circadianfluctuations in several tissues, organs, and brain structures toward meal time, resulting a desynchrony withinthe body and between the organism and the external LD cycle. The daily scheduled access to a palatable snackexerts similar changes specifically to brain areas involved in motivation and reward responses. This reviewdescribes the phenomenology of food entrainment and entrainment by a palatable snack. It suggests howscheduled feeding can lead to food addiction and how shifted feeding schedules toward the sleep phase canresult in altered ingestive behavior, obesity and disturbed metabolic responses.

iso Edificio B, Fac de Medicina. Tel./fax: +52 5556 232422.).

l rights reserved.

© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1. Ingestive behavior is strongly regulated by the circadian system

In nature, animals spend several hours daily seeking food and theirefficiency for feeding determines their survival and reproduction.Feeding behavior strongly depends on circadian cycles because accessto food sources varies along the day. Some animals exhibit dailyactivity cycles aimed at avoiding being preyed upon by their hunters.Likewise hunters have developed daily cycles of activity to be efficientin catching their prey. Thus the capacity to estimate time givesanimals the possibility to anticipate the coming feeding opportunityby approaching the right location and to prepare physiological anddigestive functions for the expectedmeal. This results in adaptation toa cycling environment and better opportunities for survival.

The daily alternation of feeding/fasting is strongly coupled to thedaily cycle of wakefulness and sleep, since animals predominantly eatin their active period. Thus, feeding behavior is strongly regulated by atime keeping system organized by the biological clock, the supra-chiasmatic nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus (SCN). Thisbiological clock receives direct light information from the retina and

performs daily adjustments of the clock mechanisms to keep internaloscillations coupled to the external cycles [1,2]. The SCN controls anddrives circadian rhythms of the body by transmitting temporal signalsvia neuroendocrine, and autonomic pathways [3–6]. A completebilateral lesion of the SCN is known to abolish circadian rhythmicity ofthe sleep–wake cycle and also leads to arrhythmic patterns of thefeeding/fasting cycle [7,8].

2. Feeding schedules are potent entraining signals forcircadian rhythms

The strong interaction between the circadian system and feeding isreciprocal, since meal time also influences circadian rhythms. Inrodents, limiting food access to two or 3 h and shifting it towards theirresting phase (which corresponds to the light phase) modifies thetemporal organization of behavior [9]. Animals to which food access isscheduled to a few hours during the day develop anticipatory activitypreceding the feeding event, at a time when normally they would besleeping (Fig. 1). Anticipatory activity comprises arousal, increasedgeneral activity, exploratory behaviors (Fig. 2), sniffing, increasedwheel running and increased instrumental behaviors like pressing alever in a Skinner box to obtain food, or approaching a food source[9,10]. Restricted feeding schedules (RFS) also induce a daily peak ofcorticosterone [11] and a peak of ghrelin production by the stomach[12,13] while plasma insulin decreases[14] anticipating the dailymeal.

Fig. 1. Restricted feeding schedule (RFS) and chocolate entrainment induce food anticipatory activity (FAA). Actogram (A) and average profiles (B and C) showing generallocomotion of a rat under a light-dark cycle with chow andwater ad libitum during baseline and exposed to RFS with daily access to food at 13 h, indicated by the vertical square. Theactogram and the average profile indicate that anticipating rats are active 2-3 h before meal time. In rats receiving daily a restricted ratio of chocolate, anticipatory is reduced and isprecise. In D the actogram shows activity of a rat under chocolate entrainment, the vertical line at 13 hours indicates the time of chocolate delivery. The 18 activity profile (E and F)evidence a reduced but precise anticipatory activity of rats under chocolate entrainment (data modified from Angeles-Castellanos etal. 2008).

556 C. Escobar et al. / Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555–561

The strong entraining force of RFS for the temporal organization ofphysiology is evidenced by temporal changes in body temperature[11,15,16] by adjustments in metabolic rhythms e.g. glucose, tri-glycerides, free fatty acids [16,17] and liver enzymes [18].

2.1. Entraining effects of meal time on peripheral organs

In the SCN, as well as in other brain areas and peripheral organs, aseries of genes (cry 1, cry2, per1, per2, per3, clock, bmal1), known asclock genes are expressed that exhibit autonomous 24 h cycles oftranscription/translation. It is suggested that they constitute thecellular clock machinery that dictates rhythmicity to the SCN totransmit its neuronal oscillations to cells, tissues and systems [19].Clock genes are also expressed in other tissues and brain areas, wherethey depend on signals of the SCN to maintain coordinated and

synchronized oscillations. Feeding schedules characterized by feed-ing/fasting cycles, however, have potent synchronizing effects on theclockwork of peripheral organs [20–22]. Some organs are moresensitive than others to food elicited signals, while the pineal glandresponds to both, the light/dark (LD) cycle and to feeding schedules[23,24]. The liver is exclusively driven by feeding schedules [25–27]and the heart and the adrenal gland respond mainly to signalsprovided by the SCN via the autonomic nervous system [28]. Themechanisms by which feeding associated signals reset peripheraloscillators are not yet fully understood. More than likely it is thecombination of hormonal (e.g. glucocorticoids), metabolic (e.g.glucose) and autonomic signals initially controlled by the SCN andthen controlled by food entrainment and the feeding/fasting cycle,which drive peripheral clocks [29]. Such signals elicit intracellularsignaling pathways that involve cAMP, AMP-activated protein kinase,

Fig. 2. Persistent anticipatory activity in rats previously entrained to food (black triangles)or chocolate (black circles) as compared with the ad libitum base line (grey circles. Thevertical gray line indicates the time when food or chocolate was given. -1, -2 and +1indicate thehours previous and after the expectedmealtime. Seven days after interruptionof the scheduled meal, rats still exhibit behavioral activation at the expected meal time.

557C. Escobar et al. / Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555–561

NAD+ or SIRT1, which are possible mediators between metabolicchanges in the cells and the daily cycles of clock genes [29–33].Recently, changes in temperature have also been suggested as possiblelink between energy availability and clock gene entrainment [34].

Fig. 3.Mean temporal pattern of cells positive to the protein c-Fos in hypothalamic structureschedules (grey bars). The time point “0” on the abscissa represents food access. Data indicatfood ingestion (3) Asterisks represent significant statistical difference between ad libitum a2004 and 2007).

2.2. Entraining effects of meal time on the brain

These circadian rhythms in clock gene expression are not onlyobserved in the master circadian clock but also in brain areas withdiverse roles in behavior and physiology [35–40]. Interestingly and asobserved in the periphery, food is a relevant entraining signal for brainfunction. RFS shift the daily rhythms of vasopressin release in the SCN[41] and produce an anticipatory peak of NPY release in the PVN [42].Our group and others have shown that a few hours before meal time,when rodents are exhibiting food anticipatory activity, hypothalamicand brain stem nuclei involved in regulation of energy balance haveincreased c-Fos expression [15,43–45], a protein used as marker ofneuronal activity (Fig. 3; [46]). Likewise, RFS induce a daily anticipatorypeak of c-Fos in limbic structures involved inmotivational response andreward (Fig. 3) [47]. The samebrain areas showing c-Fos food-entrainedpatterns exhibit temporal shifts of clock gene expression (Per1 andPer2) uncoupling them from the LD signal transmitted by the SCN(Fig. 4). Such effects indicate a powerful influence of food elicited signalson the cellular rhythmicity in those areas. Thus, RFS modify the clockmachinery in cells of the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, striatum,paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus, arcuate nucleus, olfactory bulb,thenucleus accumbens, pituitary and several limbic forebrain structuresthat are important in the regulation of stress, motivation, emotion andingestive behaviors; including the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus of thestria terminalis, central amygdala, basolateral amygdala and dentategyrus of the hippocampus. [47–54].

Taken together, present data indicate that RFS are a strong drivingforce for behavior and physiology. RFS induce anticipatory activity,changes in temperature and hormonal release. Such peripheralchanges in the body occur associated with shifts in daily rhythms of

s, and cortico-limbic system in ad libitum conditions (black bars) and restricted feedinge a strong cellular activation in brains associated with anticipatory activity (-3) and withnd restricted food schedules: (pb0.001) (Data modified from Angeles- Castellanos etal,

Fig. 4. Daily oscillations of the clock protein PER1 in hypothalamic and limbic areas of rats entrained to food (grey squares) to chocolate (grey triangles) or ad libitum (black circles).Feeding schedules have a main effect on hypothalamic structures, while chocolate drives high amplitude cycles in limbic areas. The vertical bar indicates meal time (data modifiedfrom Angeles-Castellanos et al, 2008).

558 C. Escobar et al. / Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555–561

brain structures involved in homeostatic regulation, metabolicbalance, feeding and of other areas involved in motivation andreward responses. Importantly, the overall cellular activity and overallclock gene expression in the SCN remain coupled to the signalsprovided by the LD cycle [20,50,55] and this produces a desynchronybetween the time signals transmitted by the biological clock, the brainand peripheral oscillators. A desynchrony also occurs in the SCNbecause during anticipatory activity c-Fos is suppressed in the ventralarea, uncoupling the temporal pattern from its dorsal area. Thisinhibition of neuronal activity is aimed to allow the animal to becomeactive during the rest phase [56].

2.3. Daily scheduled access to a palatable snack is also a strong entrainingsignal

As described above, RFS induces a daily feeding/fasting (anabolic–catabolic) cycle, which is the main stimulus inducing anticipatoryactivation and food seeking behaviors. On the other hand this daily andpredictable food access and the resulting alternation of metabolic statesmay build up a timed mediated motivational condition of expectationand seeking food. The food-entrained activation in hypothalamic and

limbic areas suggests that both processes may contribute to behavioralactivation. In order to dissect the contribution of the motivational fromthe homeostatic factors we exposed rats to a protocol which alloweddiscarding the anabolic/catabolic cycle. Rats had free access to theirregular food andwere exposed to adaily restrictedand scheduledaccessto a palatable snack of 5 g of chocolate, which is normally ingested byrats in less than5 min [57]. Contrastingwith theRFSprotocolwhere ratsstart seeking food 2–3 h before meal time, rats receiving daily achocolate snack anticipate briefly, however very strongly (Figs. 1 and 2),exhibiting behavioral activation 30–15 min prior to snack delivery[48,57]. Someother groups have not detected this behavioral activation,whichdepends on the type of palatable snack, theduration of access andwhich type of behavior is monitored [58–60]. Furthermore, we haveobserved that after 3 weeks of daily scheduled access to a palatablesnack, the interruption of this protocol leads rats to continue seekingand waiting daily at the same hour for at least 10 days, suggesting astrong timedependentmotivation for the sweet food [48]. Interestingly,daily access to a palatable snack produces differential anticipatingneuronal activation as indicated by increased c-Fos in cortico-limbicstructures (Fig. 3) including the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens,amygdala and thalamus, while hypothalamic nuclei normally activated

559C. Escobar et al. / Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555–561

during RFS do not exhibit modified activity and exhibit similar values asundisturbed controls. Likewise the daily palatable snack entrains andshifts the daily peak of the clock protein PER1 in limbic areas [48]suggesting an entraining effect on temporal activity patterns (Fig. 4).Oscillations of PER1 driven by the daily palatable snack persisted for upto 5 cycles after interrupting the snack delivery, confirming theparticipation of a clock mechanism in the process of seeking sweetfood. This effect however, was not observed inmeasuring daily rhythmsof the clock protein PER2 [59,60] suggesting a differential effect of apalatable snack entrainment on the clockmachinery. Differential effectson clock genes by feeding schedules have also been described by Feilletet al. [37].

Altogether the present evidence suggests that scheduled dailysnacks may be sufficient to induce temporal cycles of expectancy andanticipatory search. This effect is selective on limbic areas involved inthe regulation of motivation and reward and do not depend onmetabolic anabolic/catabolic cycles, as observed with RFS. Thus,physiological signals elicited by the taste or the caloric contents of thesweet snack, by the arousal and motivation state elicited daily by thesweet snack accessmay be the driving force that starts such oscillations.

3. Does food entrainment underlie food addiction?

The potent entraining effect of a scheduled palatable snack onbehavior and corticolimbic structures, as well as the persistent searchand expectancy after interrupting the daily snack access, suggests thatstimuli representing a reward for the individual can influence thecircadian system and can drive daily rhythms of behavior and ofneuronal activity [61]. It also suggests that the daily arousal andseeking behavior might result from similar mechanisms as thoseunderlying addictive behaviors.

It is now reported that drugs of abuse can start circadian cycles inthe brain including the biological clock in a similar way as describedfor chocolate [62]. Since behavioral arousal produces phase shifts oflocomotor activity [63] and interferes with light signals drivinglocomotor activity [64] this drug entrainment may be initiated bymotivational states producing arousal and seeking behavior. Drugsthat influence vigilance and arousal also alter the expression ofcircadian rhythms by direct effects on clock genes and on the SCN [65].Recent evidence points out that also drugs of abuse modify clockgenes andmay induce temporal cycles of activity in the brain [65–67].In rodents, arrhythmic due to a bilateral lesion of the SCN, dailyadministration of metamphetamines induces circadian oscillations indifferent areas of the brain and in locomotor activity [68]. All thisevidence together supports the possible role of drugs as drivingsignals of circadian processes.

Likewise time signals associated with reward may be a drivingforce for clock genes in different brain areas and for circadian cycles ofactivity. Specifically the daily rise of dopamine showed to be essentialfor daily oscillations of the clock gene PER2 in the striatum [69]. It iswell described that after ingestion of a sweet snack, dopamine isreleased in the nucleus accumbens, a main neural structure regulatingreward and goal directed responses for both drugs and food [70].Thus, wemay speculate that a scheduled daily snack triggering a dailydopamine increase may result in entrainment of reward respondingareas in the brain, including the nucleus accumbens. This relationship,however, requires further research and opens an important perspec-tive of a possible involvement of the circadian system in foodaddiction.

4. Disturbed feeding schedules lead to desynchrony, obesity andaltered ingestive behavior

The protocol of RFS as well as entrainment with a daily palatablesnack have provided important knowledge on the powerful influencethat meal time can exert on physiological and behavioral temporal

patterns. Feeding schedules drive differentially metabolic and genecycles in cells, tissues, organs and in neuronal activity; they overridethe influence of the LD cycle, the SCN and some, but not all systems.Thus, food or snack ingestion when scheduled at the wrong time canbe a cause of circadian desynchrony between the external cycles,internal cycles and the internal homeostastic systems, leading toaltered responses of the body to food ingestion. Recent studiesindicate that in experimental rodents food ingestion at the wrongtime can lead to obesity and metabolic disturbances [71,72]. In thehuman population, the shift of the main daily food ingestion towardthe night has shown to promote body weight increase and thusoverweight, obesity and metabolic disruption [73,74]. Also, studieswith young adults have evidenced that shifting food intake to thenight leads to metabolic disturbance characterized by a reducedinsulin secretion, high levels of glucose and of triacylglycerols [75,76],all of them indicators of metabolic syndrome. All these indicate therelevance of organized feeding schedules coupled to the normalactivity time (the light phase for humans) in order to maintain energyhomeostasis [77].

5. Conclusion

Data here discussed indicate that scheduling a meal or a snack on adaily basis leads to expectancy and anticipation in experimentalmodels. This circadian process, could explain learned eating patternsin which individuals search for food or a palatable snack at specifichours of the day and may explain conditions of food addiction inwhich the search for food is associated to specific moments of the day.Consequently binge eating and night eating syndrome, that arecharacterized by altered circadian patterns of food ingestion mayreflect such interaction with the circadian system.

Acknowledgments

The group receives support from CONACYT 82462 and 79797 andPAPIIT IN-224911 and IN-205809.

References

[1] Klein DC, Moore RY, Reppert SM. Suprachiasmatic nucleus: the mind's clock.NewYork: Oxford University Press; 1991.

[2] Hastings M, O'Neill JS, Maywood ES. Circadian clocks: regulators of endocrine andmetabolic rhythms. J Endocrinol 2007;195:187–98.

[3] Buijs RM, la Fleur SE, Wortel J, Van Heyningen C, Zuiddam L, Mettenleiter TC,et al. The suprachiasmatic nucleus balances sympathetic and parasympatheticoutput to peripheral organs through separate preautonomic neurons. J CompNeurol 2003;8(464(1)):36–48.

[4] Guo H, Brewer JM, Champhekar A, Harris RB, Bittman EL. Differential control ofperipheral circadian rhythms by suprachiasmatic-dependent neural signals. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102(8):3111–6.

[5] Kalsbeek A, Palm IF, La Fleur SE, Scheer FA, Perreau-Lenz S, Ruiter M, et al.SCN outputs and the hypothalamic balance of life. J Biol Rhythms 2006;21(6):458–69.

[6] Tousson E, Meissl H. Suprachiasmatic nuclei grafts restore the circadian rhythmin the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. J Neurosci 2004;24(12):2983–8.

[7] Stephan FK, Zucker I. Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomotoractivity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A1972;69:1583–6.

[8] Nagai K, Nishio T, Nakagawa H, Nakamura S, Fukuda Y. Effect of bilateral lesions ofthe suprachiasmatic nuclei on the circadian rhythm of food-intake. Brain Res1978;142:384–9.

[9] Mistlberger RE. Circadian food-anticipatory activity: formal models and physio-logical mechanisms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1994;18(2):171–95.

[10] Mistlberger R. Food-anticipatory circadian rhythms: concepts and methods. Eur JNeurosci 2009;30:1718–29.

[11] Krieger DT. Food and water restriction shifts corticosterone temperature, activityand brain amine periodicity. Endocrinology 1974;95:1195–201.

[12] Blum ID, Patterson Z, Khazall R, Lamont EW, Sleeman MW, Horvath TL, et al.Reduced anticipatory locomotor responses to scheduled meals in ghrelin receptordeficient mice. Neuroscience 2009;164(2):351–9.

[13] LeSauter J, Hoque N, Weintraub M, Pfaff DW, Silver R. Stomach ghrelin-secretingcells as food-entrainable circadian clocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106(32):13582–7.

560 C. Escobar et al. / Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555–561

[14] Díaz-Muñoz M, Vázquez-Martínez O, Aguilar-Roblero R, Escobar C. Anticipatorychanges in liver metabolism and entrainment of insulin, glucagon, andcorticosterone in food-restricted rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol2000;279:R2048–56.

[15] Gooley JJ, Schomer A, Saper CB. The dorsomedial hypothalamic nucleus iscritical for the expression of food-entrainable circadian rhythms. Nat Neurosci2006;29(3):398–407.

[16] Satoh Y, Kawai H, Kudo N, Kawashima Y, Mitsumoto A. Time-restricted feedingentrains daily rhythms of energy metabolism in mice. Am J Physiol Regul IntegrComp Physiol 2006;290(5):R1276–83.

[17] Escobar C, Díaz-Muñoz M, Encinas F, Aguilar-Roblero R. Persistence of metabolicrhythmicity during fasting and its entrainment by restricted feeding schedules inrats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1998;274(43):R1309–16.

[18] Baez-Ruiz A, Escobar C, Aguilar-Roblero R, Vázquez-Martínez O, Díaz-Muñoz M.Metabolic adaptations of liver mitochondria during restricted feeding schedules.Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005;289(6):G1015–23.

[19] Siepka SM, Yoo SH, Park J, Lee C, Takahashi JS. Genetics and neurobiology ofcircadian clocks in mammals. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2007;72:251–9.

[20] Damiola F, Le Minh N, Preitner N, Kornmann B, Fleury-Olela F, Schibler U.Restricted feeding uncouples circadian oscillators in peripheral tissues from thecentral pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Genes Dev 2000;14:2950–61.

[21] Davidson AJ, Poole AS, Yamazaki S, Menaker M. Is the food-entrainable circadianoscillator in the digestive system? Genes Brain Behav 2003;2(1):32–9.

[22] Stokkan KA, Yamazaki S, Tei H, Sakaki Y, Menaker M. Entrainment of the circadianclock in the liver by feeding. Science 2001;291:490–3.

[23] Feillet CA, Mendoza J, Pévet P, Challet E. Restricted feeding restores rhythmicity inthe pineal gland of arrhythmic suprachiasmatic-lesioned rats. Eur J Neurosci2008;28(12):2451–8.

[24] Wu T, Jin Y, Kato H, Fu Z. Light and food signals cooperate to entrain the rat pinealcircadian system. J Neurosci Res 2008;86:3246–55.

[25] Wu T, Ni Y, Zhuge F, Fu Z. Resetting process of peripheral circadian geneexpression after the combined reversal of feeding schedule and light/dark cyclevia a 24-h light period transition in rats. Physiol Res 2010;59(4):581–90.

[26] Kornmann B, Schaad O, Reinke H, Saini C, Schibler U. Regulation of circadian geneexpression in liver by systemic signals and hepatocyte oscillators. Cold SpringHarb Symp Quant Biol 2007;72:319–30.

[27] Díaz-Muñoz M, Vázquez-Martínez O, Báez-Ruiz A, Martínez-Cabrera G, Soto-AbrahamMV, Avila-CasadoMC, et al. Daytime food restriction alters liver glycogen, triacylglycer-ols, and cell size. A histochemical, morphometric, and ultrastructural study. CompHepatol 2010;9:5 http://www.comparative-hepatology.com/content/9/1/5.

[28] Sakamoto K, Ishida N. Light-induced phase-shifts in the circadian expressionrhythm of mammalian period genes in the mouse heart. Eur J Neurosci 2000;12(11):4003–6.

[29] Balsalobre A, Brown SA, Marcacci L, Tronche F, Kellendonk C, Reichardt HM, et al.Resetting of circadian time in peripheral tissues by glucocorticoid signaling.Science 2000;289:2344–7.

[30] Hirota T, Okano T, Kokame K, Shirotani-Ikejima H, Miyata T, Fukada Y. Glucosedown-regulates Per1 and Per2 mRNA levels and induces circadian geneexpression in cultured Rat-1 fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 2002;277:44244–51.

[31] Lamia KA, Sachdeva UM, DiTacchio L,Williams EC, Alvarez JG, Egan DF, et al. AMPKregulates the circadian clock by cryptochrome phosphorylation and degradation.Science 2009;326:437–40.

[32] Imai S. "Clocks" in the NADWorld: NAD as a metabolic oscillator for the regulationof metabolism and aging. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010;1804(8):1584–90.

[33] Bellet MM, Sassone-Corsi P. Mammalian circadian clock and metabolism — theepigenetic link. J Cell Sci 2010;123:3837–48.

[34] Buhr ED, Yoo SH, Takahashi JS. Temperature as a universal resetting cue formammaliancircadian oscillators. Science 2010;330:379–85.

[35] AbeM, Herzog ED, Yamazaki S, StraumeM, Tei H, Sakaki Y, et al. Circadian rhythmsin isolated brain regions. J Neurosci 2002;22:350–6.

[36] Abraham U, Prior JL, Granados-Fuentes D, Piwnica-Worms DR, Herzog ED.Independent circadian oscillations of Period1 in specific brain areas in vivo andin vitro. J Neurosci 2005;21(25(38)):8620–6.

[37] Feillet CA, Mendoza J, Albrecht U, Pévet P, Challet E. Forebrain oscillators tickingwith different clock hands. Mol Cell Neurosci 2008;37(2):209–21.

[38] Granados-Fuentes D, Saxena MT, Prolo LM, Aton SJ, Herzog ED. Olfactory bulbneurons express functional, entrainable circadian rhythms. Eur J Neurosci2004;19(4):898–906.

[39] Guilding C, Piggins HD. Challenging the omnipotence of the suprachiasmatictimekeeper: are circadian oscillators present throughout the mammalian brain?Eur J Neurosci 2007;25:3195–216.

[40] Shieh KR. Distribution of the rhythm-related genes rPERIOD1, rPERIOD2, andrCLOCK, in the rat brain. Neuroscience 2003;118:831–43.

[41] Kalsbeek A, van Heerikhuize JJ, Wortel J, Buijs RM. Restricted daytime feedingmodifies suprachiasmatic nucleus vasopressin release in rats. J Biol Rhythms1998;13(1):18–29.

[42] Yoshihara T, Honma S, Honma K. Effects of restricted daily feeding on neuropeptideY release in the rat paraventricular nucleus. Am J Physiol 1996;270:E589–95.

[43] Angeles-Castellanos M, Aguilar-Roblero R, Escobar C. c-Fos expression inhypothalamic nuclei of food-entrained rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr CompPhysiol 2004;286:158–65.

[44] Angeles-Castellanos M, Mendoza J, Díaz-Muñoz M, Escobar C. Food entrainmentmodifies the c-Fos expression pattern in brain stem nuclei of rats. Am J PhysiolRegul Integr Comp Physiol 2005;288(3):R678–84.

[45] Mieda M, Williams SC, Richardson JA, Tanaka K, Yanagisawa M. The dorsomedialhypothalamic nucleus as a putative food-entrainable circadian pacemaker. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(32):12150–5.

[46] Curran T, Morgan Jl. Fos: an immediate-early transcription factor in neurons.J Neurobiol 1995;26(3):403–12.

[47] Angeles-Castellanos M, Mendoza J, Escobar C. Restricted feeding schedules phaseshift daily rhythms of c-Fos and protein Per1 immunoreactivity in corticolimbicregions in rats. Neuroscience 2007;5(144(1)):344–55.

[48] Angeles-Castellanos M, Salgado-Delgado R, Rodriguez K, Buijs RM. Escobar Cexpectancy for food or expectancy for chocolate reveals timing systems formetabolism and reward. Neuroscience 2008;155:297–307.

[49] Lamont EW, Diaz LR, Barry-Shaw J, Stewart J, Amir S. Daily restricted feedingrescues a rhythm of period2 expression in the arrhythmic suprachiasmaticnucleus. Neuroscience 2005;132:245–8.

[50] Minana-Solis MC, Angeles-Castellanos M, Feillet C, Pevet P, Challet E, Escobar C.Differential effects of a restricted feeding schedule on clock-gene expression in thehypothalamus of the rat. Chronobiol Int 2009;26(5):808–20.

[51] Wakamatsu H, Yoshinobu Y, Aida R, Moriya T, Akiyama M, Shibata S. Restricted-feeding-induced anticipatory activity rhythm is associated with a phase-shift ofthe expression of mPer1 and mPer2 mRNA in the cerebral cortex and hippo-campus but not in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of mice. Eur J Neurosci 2001;13:1190–6.

[52] Segall LA, Verwey M, Amir S. Timed restricted feeding restores the rhythms ofexpression of the clock protein, Period2, in the oval nucleus of the bed nucleus ofthe stria terminalis and central nucleus of the amygdala in adrenalectomized rats.Neuroscience 2008;157(1):52–6.

[53] Verwey M, Khoja Z, Stewart J, Amir S. Region-specific modulation of PER2expression in the limbic forebrain and hypothalamus by nighttime restrictedfeeding in rats. Neurosci Lett 2008;440:54–8.

[54] Verwey M, Amir S. Food-entrainable circadian oscillators in the brain. Eur JNeurosci 2009;30(9):1650–7.

[55] Hara R, Wan K, Wakamatsu H, Aida R, Morita T, Akiyama M, et al. Restrictedfeeding entrains liver clock without participation of the suprachiasmatic nucleus.Genes Cells 2001;6:269–78.

[56] Acosta-Galvan G, Yi CX, van der Vliet J, Jhamandas JH, Panula P, Angeles-Castellanos M, et al. Interaction between hypothalamic dorsomedial nucleus andthe suprachiasmatic nucleus determines intensity of food anticipatory behavior.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:5813–8.

[57] Mendoza J, Angeles-Castellanos M, Escobar C. A daily palatable meal withoutfood deprivation entrains the suprachiasmatic nucleus of rats. Eur J Neurosci2005;22(11):2855–62.

[58] Mistlberger R, Rusak B. Palatable daily meals entrain anticipatory activity rhythmsin free-feeding rats: dependence on meal size and nutrient content. Physiol Behav1987;41(3):219–26.

[59] Verwey M, Khoja X, Stewart J, Amir S. Differential regulation of the expression ofPer2 protein in the limbic forebrain and dorsomedial hypothalamus by dailylimited access to highly palatable food in food deprived and free-fed rats.Neuroscience 2007;147:277–85.

[60] Waddington Lamont E, Harbour VL, Barry-Shaw J, Renteria Diaz L, Robinson B,Stewart J, et al. Restricted access to food, but not sucrose, saccharine, or salt,synchronizes the expression of Period2 protein in the limbic forebrain.Neuroscience 2007;144:402–11.

[61] Webb IC, Baltazar RM, Lehman MN, Coolen LM. Bidirectional interactions betweenthe circadian and reward systems: is restricted food access a unique zeitgeber?Eur J Neurosci 2009;30:1739–48.

[62] Kosobud AE, Gillman AG, Leffel II JK, Pecoraro NC, Rebec GV, Timberlake W. Drugsof abuse can entrain circadian rhythms. Sci World J 2007;7:203–12.

[63] Mistlberger RE, Antle MC, Webb IC, Jones M, Weinberg J, Pollock MS. Circadianclock resetting by arousal in Syrian hamsters: the role of stress and activity. Am JPhysiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003;285(4):R917–25.

[64] Edelstein K, De la Iglesia HO, Schwrtz WJ, Mrosovsky N. Behavioral arousal blockslight-induced phase advances in locomotor rhythmicity but not light-inducedPer1 and Fos expression in the hamster suprachiasmatic nucleus. Neuroscience2003;118:252–61.

[65] Mrosovsky N, Salomon P. Triazolam and phase shifting acceleration re-evaluated.Chronobiol Int 1990;7:35–41.

[66] Acuna-Goycolea C, Obrietan K, Van den Pol AN. Cannabinoids excite circadianclock neurons. J Neurosci 2010;30(30):10061–6.

[67] Adan A. Ritmicidad circadiana y adicción, Circadian rhythmicity and addiction.Adicciones 2010;22(1):5–9.

[68] Honma KI, Honma S. The SCN-independent clocks, methamphetamine and foodrestriction. Eur J Neurosci 2009;30:1707–17.

[69] Hood S, Cassidy P, Cossette MP, Weigl Y, Verwey M, Robinson B, et al. Endogenousdopamine regulates the rhythm of expression of the clock protein PER2 in the ratdorsal striatumvia daily activation of D2 dopamine receptors. J Neurosci 2010;30(42):14046-1458.

[70] Carelli RM. Nucleus accumbens cell firing and rapid dopamine signaling duringgoal-directed behaviors in rats. Neuropharmacology 2004;47(suppl 1):180–9.

[71] Arble DM, Ramsey KM, Bass J, Turek FW. Circadian disruption and metabolicdisease: findings from animal models. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab2010;24(5):785–800.

[72] Salgado-Delgado R, Angeles-Castellanos M, Saderi N, Buijs RM, Escobar C. Foodintake during the normal activity phase prevents obesity and circadiandesynchrony in a rat model of night work. Endocrinology 2010;151(3):1019–29.

[73] Pearson H. Sleep it off. Nature 2006;443(21):261–3.

561C. Escobar et al. / Physiology & Behavior 104 (2011) 555–561

[74] Spiegel K, Tasali E, Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Effects of poor and short sleep onglucose metabolism and obesity risk. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2009;5:253–61.

[75] Al-Naimi S, Hampton SM, Richard P, Tzung C, Morgan LM. Postprandial metabolicprofiles following meals and snacks eaten during simulated night and day shiftwork. Chronobiol Int 2004;21(6):937–47.

[76] Qin LQ, Li J, Wang Y, Wang J, Xu JY, Kaneko T. The effects of nocturnal life onendocrine circadian patterns in healthy adults. Life Sci 2003;73(19):2467–75.

[77] Kreier F, Yilmaz A, Kalsbeek A, Romijn JA, Sauerwein HP, Fliers E, et al. Hypothesis:shifting the equilibrium from activity to food leads to autonomic unbalance andthe metabolic syndrome. Diabetes 2003;2(11):2652–6.


Recommended