Date post: | 04-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | madhurgupta |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 28
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
1/28
Copyright 2006Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Chapter 14
Consumer Decision Making I:The Process
Consumer Behaviour
Canadian EditionSchiffman/Kanuk/Das
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
2/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-2
Levels of Consumer Decision
MakingExtensive Problem
Solving
Limited Problem
Solving
Routine Response
Behaviour
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
3/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-3
Factors That Affect the Type of
Decision Making Process Used Importance of the decision
Extent of previous experience
Existence of well-established decisioncriteria
Amount of information at hand about eachalternative
The number of alternatives available Model of consumption being followed
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
4/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-4
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
5/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-5
Consumer Decision MakingThe
ProcessNeed Recognition
Pre-purchase Search
Evaluation of Alternatives
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
6/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-6
Need or Problem Recognition
The realization that there is a difference
between actual and desired states
The higher the gap, the stronger the need (orbigger the problem)
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
7/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-7
Types of Problems
Active Versus Inactive problems
Active: those you are aware of
Inactive: those that you are not yet aware of
(but exist)
Those that require immediate solutions and
those that do not require immediatesolutions
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
8/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-8
Problem Recognition and
Marketing Strategy Identify existing consumer problems and find
solutions for these
Lower the actual state Increase the desired state
Increase the importance of the gap between actualand desired states
Convert inactive problems to active problems Convert problems into ones requiring an
immediate solution
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
9/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-9
Pre-Purchase Search
Types of Information Sources
Types of Information Sought
Factors Affecting Extent of Information
Search
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
10/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-10
Figure 14-3: Types of
Information SourcesPERSONAL
Friends
NeighborsRelatives
Co-workers
Computer salespeople
Calling the electronics
store
IMPERSONAL
Newspaper articles
Magazine articlesConsumer Reports
Direct-mail brochures
Information from product
advertisements
Internal web site
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
11/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-11
Types of Information Sought
Brands or alternatives available
Evaluative criteria to be used
Generally, product features
Ratings of brands on evaluative criteria
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
12/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-12
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
13/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-13
Factors that Increase the Level of
Pre-purchase Search
Product Factors: Higher search when
It is a long-lasting or infrequently used
product
There are frequent changes in product styling
Large volume is purchased
The price is high
There are many alternative brands
There is much variation in features continued
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
14/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-14
Factors that Increase the Level of
Pre-purchase Search
Situational Factors: Higher search when:
Experience is lower
Previous experience was unsatisfactory
Social Acceptability: Higher search when:
Purchase is a gift
Product is socially visible in use
continued
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
15/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-15
Factors that Increase the Level of
Pre-purchase Search
Value-Related Factors: Higher search
when:
Purchase is discretionary
All alternatives have both positive and
negative qualities
No agreement among users exists
Conflicting information is available
Other considerations exist continued
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
16/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-16
Factors that Increase the Level of
Pre-purchase Search
Consumer Factors: Higher search when:
Consumers are well-educated, have higher
income levels and are younger
Consumers are low in dogmatism and risk
perception
Level of involvement is high
Shopping is seen as an enjoyable activity continued
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
17/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-17
Evaluation of AlternativesTypes
of Consumer Choice Processes
Affective choices
More holistic; an overall evaluation
based on how one feels about a purchase
Attribute-based choices
Have pre-determined evaluative criteria
May require both external and internal search
Complicated decision rules may be used
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
18/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-18
Nature of Evaluative Criteria
Can be tangible or intangible
Include surrogate indicators
Attributes that are used as indicators of another
attribute
Are often ranked in order of importance
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
19/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-19
Consumer Decision Rules
Procedures used by consumers to facilitate
brand or other consumption-related choices
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
20/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-20
Consumer Decision Rules
Compensatory
Brands evaluated in terms of each relevant
criteria and the best brand (or one with thehighest score) is chosen
Non-compensatory
Positive evaluations do not compensate for
negative evaluations
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
21/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-21
Non-Compensatory Consumer
Decision Rules Conjunctive Decision Rule
Product attributes are identified
a minimally acceptable cutoff point isestablished for each attribute
brands that fall below the cutoff point on
any one attribute are eliminated fromfurther consideration. continued
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
22/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-22
Non-Compensatory Consumer
Decision Rules Disjunctive Decision Rule
consumers identify product attributes
establish a minimally acceptable cutoffpoint for each attribute
accept the brand that meets or exceeds
the cutoff for any oneattribute
continued
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
23/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-23
Non-Compensatory Consumer
Decision Rules
Lexicographic Decision Rule
Product attributes are identified
Product attributes are ranked in terms of
importancebrands are compared in terms of the attribute
considered most important
Brand that scores highest on the first attribute is
chosenIf there is a tie, the scores on the next attribute
are considered
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
24/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-24
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
25/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-25
Issues in Alternative Evaluation
Lifestyles as a Consumer Decision Strategy
Incomplete Information
Non-comparable Alternatives Series of Decisions
Consumption Vision
Mental picture of the consequences of using aparticular product
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
26/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-26
Coping with Missing Information
Delay decision until missing information isobtained
Ignore missing information and useavailable information
Change the decision strategy to one thatbetter accommodates for the missinginformation
Infer the missing information
8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
27/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-27
Information Search and
Marketing Strategy Get products into consumers evoked set
Limit information search if your brand is
the preferred brand
Increase information search if your
alternative is not the preferred brand
Use point-of-purchase advertising
effectively
http://www.lemontonic.com/8/14/2019 schiff_cb_ce_14.ppt
28/28
Copyright 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
14-28
Alternative Evaluation and
Marketing Strategy Identify decision rule used by target market and
use suitable promotional messages
Influence the choice of evaluative criteria Influence the rating of your product on evaluative
criteria used
Use surrogate indicators effectively
Use consumption vision
http://www.swisswater.com/