29
School, Family, and Mental Health Professions DASHBOARD Dashboard Compiled by SOLES Office of Assessment Data are from Spring 2014 to Fall 2014 Sources, unless otherwise noted. 1
School, Family, and Mental Health Professions DASHBOARD Dashboard Compiled by SOLES Office of Assessment
Data are from Spring 2014 to Fall 2014 Sources, unless otherwise noted.
1
Dashboard Overview
This dashboard captures and summarizes School, Family, and Mental Health Professions’ data collected from various sources. The Dashboard examines trends and compares targeted values to actual data values using 36 different measures. Dashboard data are presented first, followed by supporting data tables/charts, including n-values and sources of data. Faculty, staff, and administrators are encouraged to examine the dashboard data closely, noting strengths and any areas in need of strengthening, so as to ensure a high quality education for all School, Family, and Mental Health students .
February 12, 2015
2
Trends in Admission, Enrollment, and Degrees/Credentials Awarded -Dashboard Data _______________ Please see supporting data tables/charts for more details, including n-values and sources of data. _______________________ FTE means full time equivalent
3
Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Target (3 Yr Avg)
Fall 2014
Admission Data 80 76 93 83 65Direction of Change ~ ↓ ↑ ʘ ↓
Enrollment Headcount 157 171 186 171 180Direction of Change ~ ↑ ↑ ʘ ↑
Enrollment FTE 118.4 134.5 146.8 133 138.5Direction of Change ~ ↑ ↑ ʘ ↑
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Target (3 Yr Avg)
2013-2014
Fall to Spring Retention: MA in Counseling, School Counseling
85% 96% 93% 91% 100%
Direction of Change ~ ↑ ↓ ʘ ↑
Fall to Spring Retention: MA in Counseling, Clinical Mental Health Counseling
94% 94% 100% 96% 97%
Direction of Change ~ ↑ ↑ ʘ ↑
Fall to Spring Retention: MA in Marital & Family Therapy
96% 97% 100% 98% 100%
Direction of Change ~ ↑ ↑ ʘ ↑
Number of Graduate Degrees Awarded 66 63 68 66 70Direction of Change ~ ↓ ↑ ʘ ↑
Number of Graduate Credentials Awarded 13 19 26 19 29Direction of Change ~ ↑ ↑ ʘ ↑
Trends in Admission, Enrollment, and Degrees/Credentials Awarded
Key: ↑= At or Above Target ↓= Below Target ~ = Baseline data ʘ = Target: 3 Year Average
Note: This value reflects the limited space available in cohorts.
*
FTE and Time to Completion Dashboard Data ____________ Please see supporting data tables/charts for more details, including n-values and sources of data. ______________________ FTE means full time equivalent
4
Note: 1.5 times each Programs’ Time Frame is consistent with the Integrated Post Secondary Education Data System’s calculation of graduation rates
Measure Target Data Value Relationship of Data Value to Target Value
Ratio of FTE Tenured Track SFMH Faculty to FTE Non-Tenured Track SFMH Faculty
≥ 1 2 ↑
Ratio of FTE Student to FTE Faculty
9 < ratio < 12 9 ↑
Measure Target Data Value Relationship of Data Value to Target Value
Percent of Entering Cohort Graduating within 1.5 times the normal timeframe for the MA in Marital & Family Therapy
80% 96% ↑
Percent of Entering Cohort Graduating within 1.5 times the normal timeframe for the MA in Clinical Mental Health Counseling
80% 88% ↑
Percent of Entering Cohort Graduating within 1.5 times the normal timeframe for the MA in School Counseling
80% 85% ↑
School Family & Mental Health Dashboard Data
Key: ↑= At or Above Target ↓= Below Target
Quality of Educational Experience Dashboard Data – Exit Survey _______________ Please see supporting data tables/charts for more details, including n-values and sources of data.
5
Measure Target Data ValueRelationship of Data Value to Target Value
Quality of Educational Experience (Exit Survey)
Faculty > 4 4.1 ↑Advisor > 4 4.3 ↑
Intellectual Climate > 4 4.2 ↑Program Support > 4 3.9 ↓
University Support > 4 3.9 ↓Overall Satisfaction > 4 4.1 ↑
Key: ↑= At or Above Target ↓= Below Target
5 Point Scale
Quality of Educational Experience Dashboard Data – Course Evaluations _______________ Please see supporting data tables/charts for more details, including n-values and sources of data.
6
Measure Target Data ValueRelationship of Data Value to Target Value
Quality of Educational Experience (Course Evaluations)
Overall Satisfaction > 6 6.3 ↑Teaching > 6 6.2 ↑
Faculty Relationship with Students
> 6 6.4 ↑
Course Requirements & Student Evaluation > 6 6.2 ↑
Key: ↑= At or Above Target ↓= Below Target
7-Point Scale
Overall Program Satisfaction Dashboard Data - Alumni Survey _________________ Please see supporting data tables/charts for more details, including n-values and sources of data.
______________ Note1: Alumni noted in their responses the challenges they faced during the years of the economic downturn.
7
Note: The Alumni Survey is administered every other year.
MeasureOverall Program Satisfaction (Alumni Survey)
Good Career Preparation ≥ 80% 93% ↑Educational Experience
Fulfilled Expectations≥ 80% 89% ↑
Recommend Program to Others
≥ 80% 76% 1 ↓
Good Value for the Quality of Program ≥ 80% 69% 1 ↓
Key: ↑= At or Above Target ↓= Below Target
Target Data Value Relationship of Data Value to Target Value
Alumni Employment and Professional Activities Dashboard Data _______________ Please see supporting data tables/charts for more details, including n-values and sources of data.
8
Note: The Alumni Survey is administered every other year.
MeasureEmployment & Professional Activities (Alumni Survey)
Employment Status of Alumni ≥ 80% 89% ↑
Time from Graduation to Job Attainment
≥ 80% employed within 12 months of
graduation85% ↑
Alumni Attend Professional Conferences
≥ 50% 66% ↑
Alumni Belong to Professional Associations
≥ 50% 58% ↑
Alumni Present at Conferences≥ 25% 26% ↑
Alumni Publish Articles/Books≥ 10% 12% ↑
MeasureCareer Preparation (Employer Survey)
More Prepared or As Prepared as Other Programs
≥ 80% 97% ↑
Very Satisfied or Satisfied with Level of Preparation
≥ 80% 89% ↑
Very Likely or Likely to Hire a USD-SOLES Alumni ≥ 80% 85% ↑
Target Data ValueRelationship of Data
Value to Target Value
Key: ↑= At or Above Target ↓= Below Target
Target Data ValueRelationship of Data
Value to Target Value
Supporting Data Tables and Charts
The slides which follow are tables and charts containing data used in the Dashboard, which include n-values and sources of data.
9
RATIO OF FULL TIME EQUIVALENT TENURED TRACK SCHOOL FAMILY AND MENTAL HEALTH FACULTY TO FULL TIME EQUIVALENT NON-TENURED TRACK SCHOOL FAMILY AND MENTAL HEALTH FACULTY (FALL 2014)
Source: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) SOLES Fall 2014 Faculty Data
10
FTE Tenured Track SFMH
Faculty 67%
FTE Non-Tenured Track SFMH Faculty
33%
Ratio of FTE Tenured Track School Family and Mental Health Faculty to FTE Non Tenured Track School Family and Mental Health Faculty
(Fall 2014)
FTE Tenured Track SFMH Faculty FTE Non-Tenured Track SFMH Faculty
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Students and Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Faculty - Fall 2013 and Fall 2014 Source of FTE Students: Data
extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) Stat Book; Includes all levels of students, where FTE is based on 15 units for undergraduate students and 12 units for graduate students. Source of FTE Faculty: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) SOLES Fall 2013 and 2014 Faculty Data
11
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Fall 2013
Fall 2014
150.7
143
17.7
16.7
Number of Full Time Equivalents
Acad
emic
Per
iod
Comparison of SFMH Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Students and SFMH Full time Equivalent (FTE) Faculty
Fall 2013 and Fall 2014 FTE Students FTE Faculty
Ratio of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Students to Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Faculty - Fall 2014 Source of FTE Students: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) Stat Book; Includes all levels of students, where FTE is based on 15 units for undergraduate students and 12 units for graduate students. Source of FTE Faculty: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) SOLES Fall 2013 and 2014 Faculty Data
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9
9
Ratio
of F
TE
Stud
ent t
o FT
E Fa
culty
School, Family & Mental HealthFall 2013: Ratio of FTE Students to
FTE Faculty 9
Fall 2014: Ratio of FTE Students toFTE Faculty 9
Comparison: Ratio of SFMH Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Students to SFMH Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Faculty - Fall 2013 and Fall 2014
Admissions Data
Source: Data from USD-SOLES Admissions Office
13
Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014Completed
Applications 291 309 352 282
Admitted 138 137 146 129Attended 80 76 93 65
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Num
ber o
f Per
sons
School, Family & Mental Health Professions: Fall Admissions Data
Graduate Enrollment Data - Headcount
Source: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) Stat Book; 1 Includes students enrolled only in certificate or credential programs; does not include visiting, exchange, or special students.
14 36 44 36 36
218 213 219 238
159 130 183
229
157 171
186
180 570 558
624
683
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014
Hea
dcou
nt
USD-SOLES Graduate Headcount by Department
School, Family & Mental Health
Learning & Teaching
Leadership Studies
Credential or Certificate only
USD-SOLES Total
Graduate Enrollment Data - FTEs
Source: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) Stat Book; 1 Includes students enrolled only in certificate or credential programs; does not include visiting, exchange, or special students. 2 The FTE calculation is based on the sum of credits carried by all students enrolled in classes at a particular level, divided by the number of credits in a full-time load per IRP Quick Facts: 12 units = 1 FTE graduate student and 15 units =1 FTE for undergraduate student.
15
21.3 24.3 19.8 19.9
100.3 94.9 102.9 113.8
108.5 106.1 141.6
163.9
118.4 134.5
146.8
138.5 348.2 359.6
411.1
435.9
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014
Hea
dcou
nt
USD-SOLES Graduate Full Time Equivalent Students2 (FTE's) by Department
School, Family & Mental Health
Learning & Teaching
Leadership Studies
Credential or Certificate only
USD-SOLES Total
Undergraduate Enrollment Data - FTEs
Source: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) Stat Book; 1 Includes students enrolled only in certificate or credential programs; does not include visiting, exchange, or special students. 2 The FTE calculation is based on the sum of credits carried by all students enrolled in classes at a particular level, divided by the number of credits in a full-time load per IRP Quick Facts: 12 units = 1 FTE graduate student and 15 units =1 FTE for undergraduate student.
16
Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014Marital & Family Therapy 3.7 4.4 3.9 4.2
3.7
4.4
3.9
4.2
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4
4.2
4.4
4.6
Und
ergr
adua
te F
TEs
SFMH Undergraduate FTEs2
Retention: Fall to Spring
17
Source: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) Stat Book
2010 2011 2012 2013MA in School Counseling 85% 96% 93% 100%MA in Clinical Mental Health
Counseling 94% 94% 100% 97%
MA in Marital & FamilyTherapy 96% 97% 100% 100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Fall-
to-S
prin
g Re
tent
ion
Rate
Fall-to-Spring Retention: School, Family & Mental Health
Graduate Degrees Awarded
Source: Data extracted from the University Cognos Report on Graduate Degrees Awarded for an academic year (Fall, Intersession, Spring, Summer)
18
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
2013-2014Total: 70
2012-2013Total: 68
2011-2012Total: 63
2010-2011Total: 66
25
23
14
24
13
11
18
15
32
34
31
27
Number of SFMH Students Awarded a Degree
Aca
dem
ic Y
ear
USD-SOLES School, Family & Mental Health Graduate Degrees Awarded
Counseling: School Counseling Counseling: Clinical and Mental Health Marital & Family Therapy
Graduate Credentials Awarded
Source: Data extracted from the University Cognos Report on Graduate Degrees Awarded for an academic year (Fall, Intersession, Spring, Summer)
19
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
2013-2014Total: 29
2012-2013Total: 26
2011-2012Total: 19
2010-2011Total: 13
29
26
19
13
Number of SFMH Graduate Students Awarded a Credential
Aca
dem
ic Y
ear
School Family and Mental Health Graduate Credentials Awarded
Pupil Personnel Services
Time to Completion
Source: Data extracted from University Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) Stat Book
20
Note: 1.5 times each Programs’ Time Frame is consistent with the Integrated Post Secondary Education Data System’s calculation of graduation rates
M.A. School Counseling(n=13)
M.A. Clinical Mental Health Counseling(n=17)
M.A. Marital & Family Therapy(n=28)
85%
88%
96%
Time to Completion for SFMH Professions: Percent of 2010 Entering Cohort Graduating Within 1.5 Times the Normal Program Time Frame
Measures of Quality of Educational Experience – Exit Survey
Source: Data extracted from 2014 Exit Survey
21
FacultyMean
Ratings
PrincipalAdvisorMean
Ratings
Intellectual
ClimateMean
Ratings
Program-Level
Support&
CommunicationMean
Ratings
University SupportServices
MeanRatings
OverallSatisfaction with
ProgramMean
Ratings
School, Family & Mental Health 4.1 4.3 4.2 3.9 3.9 4.1
4.1 4.3 4.2 3.9 3.9
4.1
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Mea
n Ra
tings
Exit Survey Components
Measures of Quality of Educational Experience: 2014 Exit Survey Ratings for School, Family and Mental Health (N=48)
Rating scale: 5 = Strongly Agree, 4 = Agree, 3 = Neutral, 2= Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree
Measures of Quality of Educational Experience – Internationalization Requirement
Source: Data extracted from USD-SOLES 2014 Internationalization Survey Using Matched Pairs
22
Types of Experiences: • Full/Partial Course Abroad • International Project and/or Paper • Conference Abroad • Course w/ Internationalization Content
Change Due to External Factors
1%
Change Due to SOLES 82%
No Change 17%
Changes in Students’ Ex Post Facto Self-Reported Cultural Competence Levels (N = 110)
Change Due to External Factors Change Due to SOLES No Change
Measures of Quality of Educational Experience -Course Evaluations
Rating scale: 7=strongly agree, 6=agree, 5=slightly agree, 4=neutral, 3=slightly disagree, 2=disagree, 1= strongly disagree
Source: Data extracted from Spring 2014 Course Evaluations
23
6.3 6.2
6.4 6.2
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
Overall Mean Rating Teaching of CourseMaterial Mean Rating
Relationship withStudents Mean Rating
Course Requirements &Student Evaluation
Mean Rating
Mea
n Ra
tings
Course Evaluation Areas
Measures of Quality of Educational Experience: Spring 2014 Course Evaluation Mean Ratings for School, Family and Mental Health
(N=514)
Overall Program Satisfaction
Source: Data extracted from 2013 Alumni Survey
24 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Good Value for the Quality of Program
Recommend Program to Others
Education Experiences Fulfilled MyExpectations
Good Career Preparation
69%
76%
89%
93%
Overall School Family and Mental Health Alumni Program Satisfaction (N = 45)
Employment Status
Source: Data extracted from 2013 Alumni Survey
25
Employed 88%
Not Employed 6%
Self-Employed 6%
Employment Status of School Family and Mental Health Alumni (N=52)
Employment Placement Rate
Source: Data extracted from 2013 Alumni Survey
26
On or before graduation
17%
1 month 14%
3 months 23%
6 months 26%
9 months 9%
12 months 11%
12+ months 0%
Time from Graduation to Job Attainment for School Family and Mental Health Alumni (N=35)
Professional Activities
Source: Data extracted from 2013 Alumni Survey
27 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Published Articles or Books
Presented at Professional Conferences
Attend Professional Conferences
Belong to Professional Associations
6%
13%
60%
71%
School Family and Mental Health Alumni Professional Activities (N = 52)
Employer Survey Ratings
28 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Very Satisfied or Satisfied with Level of Preparation
More Prepared or As Prepared as Other CounselingPrograms
Very Likely or Likely to Hire a USD-SOLES Alumni
82%
83%
92%
Employer's Ratings Regarding USD-SOLES Counseling Graduate Programs (N = 13)
Source: Data extracted from 2014 Employer Survey for School Counseling and Clinical Mental Health Counseling Programs
Dashboard Summary
Of the 36 measures included in the Dashboard, 31 measures had a positive trend or met/exceeded the targeted value, and 5 measures had a negative trend or were below the targeted value. These data measures serve as indicators that the School, Family, and Mental Health Department within the School of Leadership and Education Sciences at the University of San Diego is providing students with a high quality education.
29
