Date post: | 18-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | terence-potter |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
School Improvement Partnership Programme:From principles to practice
Chris Chapman
A rationale for collaborative working
• The system has untapped capacity to improve itself
• There is a need to strengthen collaboration both within and between institutions
• Evidence can be used to bring a critical edge to new arrangements
• Action has to be focused on specific issues, adapted to and owned by local context
• Some co-ordination of effort is needed to optimise improvement efforts
• This approach can close the achievement gap and support the development of a more equitable education system.
• Collaborative working across boundaries
• Focus on closing the achievement gap
• The commitment to mutual benefit and the creation of leadership opportunities and professional learning of staff
• Commitment to long-term sustainability and capacity building
• Explicit links to strategic improvement planning in schools and local authorities.
• The use of systematic enquiry to develop innovative practices and monitor developments
The SIPP:Core Principles
TheSIPP: Enquiry process
Phase 1: Preparing the groundWhere are we now?What are our key concerns?What would success look like?
Phase 2: Exploring the evidenceHow do we exploit internal and external knowledge?What further evidence do we need?What new insights do we have?
Phase 3: Testing change What changes do we need to make?
How do we lever and embed change?How do we know we have made a difference?
•Identify a shared focused concern
•Based on collecting evidence, making changes to practice and monitoring and evaluating their impact
•Led and coordinated by a ‘Partnership Innovation Team’ or existing appropriate structure
•Supported by an “external trio” of critical friends
The SIPP:Developing an approach
• Locally owned and led
• Generating and sharing new ways of working
• Using evidence to inform practice
• Tailored context specific programme
• Technically simple but socially context
• Frameworks not prescription
The SIPP:Reflections