School Improvement PlanArchive Date: 09/12/2012, Report Status: Transmitted
School Year: 2012 - 2013
School District: Colon Community School District
ISD/RESA: St. Joseph County ISD
School Name: Leonidas School
Grades Served: PK,K,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
Mr. Mitch Miller
Building Code: 05231
District Approval of Plan: Authorized Official Signature and Date
Board of Education Approval of Plan: Authorized Official Signature and Date
School Improvement PlanContents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3School Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Vision, Mission and Beliefs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Goal 1: Improve Math . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Goal 2: Improve Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Goal 3: Improve Science . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17Goal 4: Improve Social Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20Goal 5: Improve Writing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Resource Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25Additional Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26Assurances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29Stakeholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Statement of Non-Discrimination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36Supporting Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Leonidas School
SIP Page 2 of 37
IntroductionThe SIP is a planning tool designed to address student achievement and system needs identified through theschool's comprehensive needs assessment (CNA). Additionally, the SIP provides a method for schools to addressthe school improvement planning requirements of Public Act 25 of the Revised School Code and the Elementaryand Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as applicable.The SIP is a planning tool designed to address studentachievement and system needs identified through the school's comprehensive needs assessment (CNA).Additionally, the SIP provides a method for schools to address the school improvement planning requirements ofPublic Act 25 of the Revised School Code and the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) asapplicable.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 3 of 37
School Information
School: Leonidas School
District: Colon Community School District
Public/Non-Public: Public
Grades: PK,K,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8
School Code Number: 05231
City: LEONIDAS
State/Province: Michigan
Country: United States
Leonidas School
SIP Page 4 of 37
Vision, Mission and BeliefsVision Statement
We are becoming a community known for educational excellence. We are innovators that others will want toemulate. We will exert a positive influence on everyone who steps through our doors.
Mission StatementOur mission is to provide a place where parents, educators and community work together to provide everyopportunity to all learners to develop a solid foundation of skills, knowledge and the understanding necessaryfor maximum growth possible for every child.
Beliefs StatementWe will identify our common goals and look for ways to move forward emphasizing communication, availablecommunity resources, and each child's need to be well parented and well educated. Our students will becomelife long learners who are caring, sensitive and adaptive human beings.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 5 of 37
GoalsName Development Status Progress Status
Improve Math Complete Open
Improve Reading Complete Open
Improve Science Complete Open
Improve Social Studies Complete Open
Improve Writing Complete Open
Goal 1: Improve Math
Content Area: MathDevelopment Status: Complete
Student Goal Statement: All students will be proficient in math in accordance with common core standards by2014.
Gap Statement: MEAP Summary Report shows gaps in fractions, decimals, multiplication, division, geometryskills/shapes,area and perimeter, computation, measurement and connections. Currently there is a gap betweenproficient and non-proficient students.
Cause for Gap: Analysis of curriculum alignment using the MEAP report and Pinnacle Insight indicates thatstudents performed at a lower level on items assessing geometry, measurement, and basic computation skills.Many students are ESL learners. The new cut scores have increased this gap. Other indicators include a need forimproved alignment to the Common Core State Standards and common assessments
Multiple measures/sources of data you used to identify this gap in student achievement: MEAP, Terra Nova,Pinnacle Insight, Golden Package, Delta Math
What are the criteria for success and what data or multiple measures of assessment will be used to monitorprogress and success of this goal? Leonidas Elementary will strive to show growth on all measures noted above.
Contact Name: Angelic Bower
List of Objectives:
Name ObjectiveImproveMath
The percentage of students achieving 80% accuracy or more on the state assessments will increase ateach grade level. More specifically, each grade level cohort will increase by 5% from the 2011 MEAPthe number of students performing at or above 80% accuracy on the 2013 MEAP Assessment.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 6 of 37
1.1. Objective: Improve Math
Measurable Objective Statement to Support Goal: The percentage of students achieving 80% accuracy ormore on the state assessments will increase at each grade level. More specifically, each grade level cohort willincrease by 5% from the 2011 MEAP the number of students performing at or above 80% accuracy on the2013 MEAP Assessment.
List of Strategies:Name StrategyCommonAssessments
The staff will identify and implement common math assessments and align curriculum withthe Common Core.
CurriculumAlignment
Staff will align and implement Common Core State Standards. This will be accomplishedby creating curriculum maps which include pacing guidelines at each grade level.
Research BasedInstruction
Teachers will implement Common Core Standards with fidelity, including activities thatsupport learning of geometry, fractions, and computation instruction through daily drills,games and manipulatives.
1.1.1. Strategy: Common Assessments
Strategy Statement: The staff will identify and implement common math assessments and align curriculumwith the Common Core.
Selected Target AreasI.2.A.3 A collaborative culture that incorporates a philosophy of continuous improvement exists at theschool or within a program. Staff members work as teams to gather and analyze information and makedecisions regarding the modification of their instructional practice.I.3.A.1 Assessments are aligned with the curriculum and instruction. They have been designed by matchingthe appropriate measurement method to the type of learning targets (knowledge, reasoning, skill,performance or disposition.)I.3.A.3 Student assessment is viewed as an essential component in the monitoring of student achievement.Aligned standardized assessments, periodic benchmark assessments as well as a variety of culminatingassessments are incorporated into daily practice. In addition, teachers use frequent formative assessmentactivities to inform instruction.
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
Dr. Robert Marzano - What Works in Schools, 2003;Classroom Instruction That Works, 2012Dr. Rick Stiggins: Common Formative Assessments,Classroom Assessment and Grading That Works, 2006School Improvement Framework, MDE, 2009
Leonidas School
SIP Page 7 of 37
List of Activities:Activity Begin
DateEndDate
Staff Responsible
Create Common Assessments 2012-09-04
2013-06-28
All staff
Identification and implementation ofcommon math assessment
2012-09-04
2013-06-28
All staff
Staff training for common mathassessment implementation
2012-09-04
2013-06-28
Administration,ISD, math committee,curriculum coordinator, and all staff.
1.1.1.1. Activity: Create Common Assessments
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: Staff will work to create and identify common benchmark assessment in all gradelevels. Curriculum Crafter and the ISD consultant(s) will be used as a resource.
The math committee will attend professional development pertaining to: Delta Math and Pinnacle,curriculum alignment/common assessments with the Common Core and Project Magellan (math datastudy)
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: Administration and staff
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
1.1.1.2. Activity: Identification and implementation of common mathassessment
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: After review of all available assessments the grade levels will make arecommendation for implementation of common math assessments.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 8 of 37
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
1.1.1.3. Activity: Staff training for common math assessment implementation
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: All staff will align curriculum and create assessments based on the CommonCore.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: Administration,ISD, math committee, curriculumcoordinator, and all staff.
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff, ISD, and administration.
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
1.1.2. Strategy: Curriculum Alignment
Strategy Statement: Staff will align and implement Common Core State Standards. This will beaccomplished by creating curriculum maps which include pacing guidelines at each grade level.
Selected Target AreasI.1.A.2 The school's curriculum framework is based upon and organized around the adopted state and localcurriculum documents.I.1.B.1 Communication and articulation about the curriculum is a high priority for the entire staff. A dialogis promoted between and across grade levels and content areas. Particular emphasis is paid to thecurriculum dialog of teachers from one instructional level to another.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 9 of 37
I.2.A.1 The content of the curriculum is directly aligned and consistent with the district's curriculumframework. Processes used to develop cohesive and essential content require articulation within and acrossgrade levels and content areas.
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
Dr. Robert Marzano - What Works in Schools - Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum, 2003
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleCreate Curriculum Maps/Pacing Guides 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 All staff and ISD.Everyday Math/Common Core State Standards comparison 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 All staff and ISD.
1.1.2.1. Activity: Create Curriculum Maps/Pacing Guides
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: Instructional staff will design and utilize curriculum maps for math to determinethe learning progression at each grade level. The goal will be to have strong vertical and horizontalalignment. Pacing guides will guarantee staff implements Common Core Standards for all studentswithin the determined time frame.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff and ISD.
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff and ISD.
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
1.1.2.2. Activity: Everyday Math/Common Core State Standards comparison
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: Staff will work at grade level and across grade levels to determine curriculumalignment; more specifically the skill alignment in Everyday Math with the Common Core State
Leonidas School
SIP Page 10 of 37
Standards. Staff will use this information to modify/adjust our implemented curriculum.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff and ISD.
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff and ISD.
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
1.1.3. Strategy: Research Based Instruction
Strategy Statement: Teachers will implement Common Core Standards with fidelity, including activitiesthat support learning of geometry, fractions, and computation instruction through daily drills, games andmanipulatives.
Selected Target AreasI.2.B.3 Staff believe that active student engagement is a key feature of student success and there is anexpectation that all teachers will design lessons and assessments that engage their students.II.2.B.4 Monitoring of the school improvement plan is the responsibility of all staff implementing strategiesas the result of the plan. Data analysis occurs on a continuous basis and staff members frequentlycollaborate to make adjustments in the plan based upon the data analyzed.I.1.A.2 The school's curriculum framework is based upon and organized around the adopted state and localcurriculum documents.I.1.B.1 Communication and articulation about the curriculum is a high priority for the entire staff. A dialogis promoted between and across grade levels and content areas. Particular emphasis is paid to thecurriculum dialog of teachers from one instructional level to another.
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
Dr. Robert Marzano: What Works in Schools, The Art and Science of Teaching, 20032011 fall MEAP results, Project Magellan, Pinnacle Insight, and Delta Math.
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleGeometry, Measurement, and Basic Computation 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 All staff
Leonidas School
SIP Page 11 of 37
1.1.3.1. Activity: Geometry, Measurement, and Basic Computation
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: Teachers will supplement the curriculum with interventions from Delta Math tosupport the Common Core targeting specific skills with daily math drills in geometry, fractions, andbasic computation. ISD will be used as consultants.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All Staff
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Math Professional Development General Funds 5,000.00 0.00
Goal 2: Improve Reading
Content Area: English Language ArtsDevelopment Status: Complete
Student Goal Statement: All students will be proficient in Reading in accordance with Common Core StateStandards by 2014.
Gap Statement: Our needs assessment showed that we have proficiency gaps in the areas of Informational Text,Comprehension, and Word Recognition/Word Study. DIBELS data shows a wide range of gaps with the largestoccurring in the upper grades. 100% of the students are at risk based on socio-economic data. Approximately 50%of the population is labeled English Second Language. We will continue to focus on Reading Comprehension,Informational Text, Word Recognition/Word Study and Fluency skills to further our academic achievement inthese areas.
Cause for Gap: Prior knowledge deficiencies; vocabulary mastery deficits; more than half the students score asEnglish Second Language learners; socio-economic data would qualify 100% of the student population as at risk.Multiple grades leads to limited instructional time.
Multiple measures/sources of data you used to identify this gap in student achievement: MEAP Scores*Benchmark Common Assessments * Terra Nova * Pinnacle Insight * DIBELS * Title III English SecondLanguage After School Literacy Program * ELPA
What are the criteria for success and what data or multiple measures of assessment will be used to monitor
Leonidas School
SIP Page 12 of 37
progress and success of this goal? We will strive to show growth on all measures noted above by formative andsummative assessments, such as: common assessments, DIBELS, PALS and REWARDS, end of unit tests,benchmark assessments, and 6 Minute Solutions. Teachers will be trained in and pilot Standards Based Reportingaccording to Marzano's methodology.
Contact Name: Suzy Garner
List of Objectives:
Name ObjectiveImproveReading
The staff will continually analyze literacy data (MEAP, DIBELS, Terra Nova). Grade 3 will be at 70%proficiency. The percentage of students achieving 80% accuracy or more on the state assessments willincrease at each grade level. Each grade level cohort will demonstrate growth in literacy data. Studentswill increase on benchmark scores from beginning of the year to the end of the year on DIBELSassessment.
2.1. Objective: Improve Reading
Measurable Objective Statement to Support Goal: The staff will continually analyze literacy data (MEAP,DIBELS, Terra Nova).Grade 3 will be at 70% proficiency. The percentage of students achieving 80% accuracy or more on the stateassessments will increase at each grade level. Each grade level cohort will demonstrate growth in literacy data.Students will increase on benchmark scores from beginning of the year to the end of the year on DIBELSassessment.
List of Strategies:Name StrategyImplementation of RTI Model(Response to Intervention)
Teachers will utilize the RTI model by implementing DIBELS assessment toidentify students and group them according to ability.
Research Based Interventions Teachers will implement researched base intervention strategies in reading eg.Road to the Code, 6 Minute Solutions, REWARDS, PALS, K-PALS, UpperPALS, Deb Wahlstrom strategies.
Teaching Treasures Readingprogram
Teachers will teach the Treasures Reading series with fidelity. Curriculum willbe aligned with the Common Core and common assessments will be utilized.
2.1.1. Strategy: Implementation of RTI Model (Response to Intervention)
Strategy Statement: Teachers will utilize the RTI model by implementing DIBELS assessment to identifystudents and group them according to ability.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 13 of 37
Selected Target Areas
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
Leonidas Elementary will utilize the RTI model and apply research based interventions to assist studentneeds.
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleDIBELS Assessment 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 Classroom teachers will assess students.
2.1.1.1. Activity: DIBELS Assessment
Activity Type: Other
Activity Description: K-6th Grade will be DIBELS assessed a minimum of three times throughout theschool year. Will explore opportunities to progress monitor strategic or intensive students.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: Classroom teachers will assess students.
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity:
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Substitute Teacher Costs, Testing Materials/DIBELS website General Funds 1,500.00
2.1.2. Strategy: Research Based Interventions
Strategy Statement: Teachers will implement researched base intervention strategies in reading eg.Road to the Code, 6 Minute Solutions, REWARDS, PALS, K-PALS, Upper PALS, Deb Wahlstromstrategies.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 14 of 37
Selected Target AreasI.2.B.2 There is a strong belief within the school or program that all students can succeed. This isdemonstrated in the expanded use at both the school or program and classroom levels of a variety of bestpractices designed to meet the differentiated needs of individual learners. Technology is a key componentof instructional practice.I.3.A.1 Assessments are aligned with the curriculum and instruction. They have been designed by matchingthe appropriate measurement method to the type of learning targets (knowledge, reasoning, skill,performance or disposition.)
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
The RTI process has helped us to identify several research based intervention strategies to utilize includingK-Pals, Pals, Six Minute Solutions, REWARDS
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleProfessional Development in Reading 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 ISD staff
2.1.2.1. Activity: Professional Development in Reading
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: ELA training provided by the ISD.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: ISD staff
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Substitute Time, Intervention Program Materials, ISD Staff Support Title II Part A 1,000.00
2.1.3. Strategy: Teaching Treasures Reading program
Leonidas School
SIP Page 15 of 37
Strategy Statement: Teachers will teach the Treasures Reading series with fidelity. Curriculum will bealigned with the Common Core and common assessments will be utilized.
Selected Target AreasI.1.A.2 The school's curriculum framework is based upon and organized around the adopted state and localcurriculum documents.I.3.A.1 Assessments are aligned with the curriculum and instruction. They have been designed by matchingthe appropriate measurement method to the type of learning targets (knowledge, reasoning, skill,performance or disposition.)II.2.B.4 Monitoring of the school improvement plan is the responsibility of all staff implementing strategiesas the result of the plan. Data analysis occurs on a continuous basis and staff members frequentlycollaborate to make adjustments in the plan based upon the data analyzed.
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
Utilization of the School Improvement Framework rubrics to identify effective strategies. Deb Wahlstrominstructional strategies and Dr. Robert Marzano Best Practices/Standards Based Reporting.
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleReading Curriculum 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 All Staff
2.1.3.1. Activity: Reading Curriculum
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: Teachers will teach the Treasures reading program with fidelity. Interventionprograms consist of PALS, Rewards, Response to Intervention, and 6 Minute Solution.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All Staff
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All Staff
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Staff Time/Substitutes Title II Part A 2,000.00
Leonidas School
SIP Page 16 of 37
Goal 3: Improve Science
Content Area: ScienceDevelopment Status: Complete
Student Goal Statement: All students will be proficient in science according to the Common Core StateStandards by 2014.
Gap Statement: MEAP Score distribution show proficiency gaps in science processes, physical science, andearth science. Science strand analysis reveals that a high percentage of our students are not proficient in all areasof science. There was an overall gap in proficiency of 15% between (the higher score)life science and (the lowerscore) physical science.
Cause for Gap: Instructional time is impacted by teaching multiple grades within one classroom. A reason for thegap is science instruction with fidelity. There is a significant number of students that are ESL learners.Implementation of science curriculum alignment is needed. Materials for science instruction is needed.
Multiple measures/sources of data you used to identify this gap in student achievement: 2011 fall MEAPScores * Pinnacle Insight *
What are the criteria for success and what data or multiple measures of assessment will be used to monitorprogress and success of this goal? Leonidas Elementary will strive to show growth on all measures noted above.Data will included MEAP * Pinnacle Insight data warehouse *
Contact Name: Becky Gray
List of Objectives:
Name ObjectiveImproveScience
The percentages of students achieving 80% accuracy or more on the state assessments will increaseat each grade level. More specifically each grade level cohort will increase by 10 % - 15%.
3.1. Objective: Improve Science
Measurable Objective Statement to Support Goal: The percentages of students achieving 80% accuracy ormore on the state assessments will increase at each grade level. More specifically each grade level cohort willincrease by10 % - 15%.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 17 of 37
List of Strategies:Name StrategyReplishishComsumableMaterials
Teachers will develop a list of materials / resources for implementation of the sciencecurriculum. Based upon the utilization of Curriculum Crafter to align sciencecurriculum at each grade level.
Standards - BasedScience Instruction
Teachers will utilize Curriculum Crafter to ensure that state content is being taught.Common assessments will be administered and collected for each grade level.
3.1.1. Strategy: Replishish Comsumable Materials
Strategy Statement: Teachers will develop a list of materials / resources for implementation of the sciencecurriculum. Based upon the utilization of Curriculum Crafter to align science curriculum at each gradelevel.
Selected Target AreasI.1.A.1 The curriculum documents are the basic framework for instruction. They contain essential andrigorous content that guides what is taught within and across grade levels. They provide consistency andcontinuity to the curriculum and instruction practiced at the school and reflects the belief that all studentsshould actively construct and apply knowledge.
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
2011 fall MEAP scores * Pinnacle Insight data warehouse
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleReplenish Comsumable Materials 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 All classroom teachers / science chair person.
3.1.1.1. Activity: Replenish Comsumable Materials
Activity Type: Other
Activity Description: Teachers will submit a list of needed materials to the science chair as defined byCurriculum Crafter.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All classroom teachers / science chair person.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 18 of 37
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff.
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Professional Development/Substitute Costs Title II Part A 150.00 0.00
3.1.2. Strategy: Standards - Based Science Instruction
Strategy Statement: Teachers will utilize Curriculum Crafter to ensure that state content is being taught.Common assessments will be administered and collected for each grade level.
Selected Target AreasI.1.A.2 The school's curriculum framework is based upon and organized around the adopted state and localcurriculum documents.I.1.A.3 The school's curriculum documents are designed in a way that ensures cohesion within and acrossgrade levels and content areas.I.2.A.1 The content of the curriculum is directly aligned and consistent with the district's curriculumframework. Processes used to develop cohesive and essential content require articulation within and acrossgrade levels and content areas.I.3.A.1 Assessments are aligned with the curriculum and instruction. They have been designed by matchingthe appropriate measurement method to the type of learning targets (knowledge, reasoning, skill,performance or disposition.)
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
2011 MEAP * Pinnacle Insight data warehouse * common assessment
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleProfessional Development 2012-10-04 2013-06-28 Classroom teachers, data coach, and ISD staff.
3.1.2.1. Activity: Professional Development
Activity Type: Professional Development
Leonidas School
SIP Page 19 of 37
Activity Description: Curriculum maps and common assessments will be created.Marzano's standards-based reporting training.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: Classroom teachers, data coach, and ISD staff.
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: Classroom teachers, data coach, and ISD staff.
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-10-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Professional Development / Substitute Teacher Cost Title II Part A 600.00 0.00
Goal 4: Improve Social Studies
Content Area: Social StudiesDevelopment Status: Complete
Student Goal Statement: All students will be proficient in Social Studies by 2014.
Gap Statement: MEAP data reports reveal a proficiency gap in civics, history, and knowledge process skills.
Cause for Gap: Instructional time is impacted by teaching multiple grades within one classroom space. Socialstudies needs to be taught with fidelity. A significant number of the students are ESL learners.
Multiple measures/sources of data you used to identify this gap in student achievement: 2011 MEAP Scores* Pinnacle Insight data warehouse * common assessment
What are the criteria for success and what data or multiple measures of assessment will be used to monitorprogress and success of this goal? Leonidas Elementary will strive to show growth on all measures noted above.
Contact Name: Adam Bowen
List of Objectives:
Name ObjectiveImproveSocialStudies
The percentage of students achieving 80% accuracy or more on the state assessment will increase.More specifically, each grade level cohort will increase by 10% - 15% from the 2011 MEAPnumber of students performing at / or above 80 % on the 2012 MEAP assessment.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 20 of 37
4.1. Objective: Improve Social Studies
Measurable Objective Statement to Support Goal: The percentage of students achieving 80% accuracy ormore on the state assessment will increase. More specifically, each grade level cohort will increase by 10% -15% from the 2011 MEAP number of students performing at / or above 80 % on the 2012 MEAP assessment.
List of Strategies:Name StrategyStandards Based SocialStudies Instruction
Teachers will utilize Curriculum Crafter to ensure that all curriculum standards arebeing taught at each grade level. Common assessments will be administered andcollected at each grade level.
4.1.1. Strategy: Standards Based Social Studies Instruction
Strategy Statement: Teachers will utilize Curriculum Crafter to ensure that all curriculum standards arebeing taught at each grade level. Common assessments will be administered and collected at each gradelevel.
Selected Target AreasI.1.A.1 The curriculum documents are the basic framework for instruction. They contain essential andrigorous content that guides what is taught within and across grade levels. They provide consistency andcontinuity to the curriculum and instruction practiced at the school and reflects the belief that all studentsshould actively construct and apply knowledge.I.1.A.2 The school's curriculum framework is based upon and organized around the adopted state and localcurriculum documents.I.1.B.2 The school makes a concerted effort to ensure that all students have a clear understanding of whatthey are studying and why they are studying it.I.2.A.2 Instructional planning is focused upon ensuring student success. Instructional practice is designedaround the needs, interests and aptitudes of the individual students. The result is a curriculum that allowsstudents to derive meaning from all of their educational experiences.III.2.C.3 Teacher input is a key feature in the analysis of professional development initiatives. Results aresolicited and analyzed based upon the changes in classroom practice, implementation of the curricular andinstructional program, and the impact on student achievement.
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
2011 fall MEAP scores * Pinnacle Insight data warehouse * common assessment
Leonidas School
SIP Page 21 of 37
List of Activities:Activity Begin
DateEnd Date Staff Responsible
Standards - Based ProfessionalDevelopment
2012-09-04
2013-06-28
All classroom teachers, data coach, and ISDstaff.
4.1.1.1. Activity: Standards - Based Professional Development
Activity Type: Professional Development
Activity Description: Curriculum maps will be created as well as common assessments. Marzano'sstandards-based reporting training.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All classroom teachers, data coach, and ISDstaff.
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All classroom teachers, data coach, and ISD staff.
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Professional Development / Substitute Costs Title II Part A 600.00 0.00
Goal 5: Improve Writing
Content Area: OtherDevelopment Status: Complete
Student Goal Statement: All students will be proficient in writing According to Common Core State Standardsby 2014.
Gap Statement: The data from the 2011 MEAP reveals that students at both grade levels were not proficient inthe writing process. Small student numbers in each grade demographics doesn't reveal a trend.
Cause for Gap: Writing needs to be taught with fidelity.A significant number of the students are ESL learners.
Multiple measures/sources of data you used to identify this gap in student achievement: MEAP Scores *
Leonidas School
SIP Page 22 of 37
Collins Writing Prompts (3 times a year)scored with teachers' rubric * Pinnacle Insight data warehouse
What are the criteria for success and what data or multiple measures of assessment will be used to monitorprogress and success of this goal? Increased proficiency percentages on MEAP writing reports and CollinsWriting Folders.
Contact Name: Suzy Garner
List of Objectives:
Name ObjectiveIncrease WritingProficiency
Increase the percent of students proficient on the MEAP writing to 50% at grades fourand seven.
5.1. Objective: Increase Writing Proficiency
Measurable Objective Statement to Support Goal: Increase the percent of students proficient on the MEAPwriting to 50% at grades four and seven.
List of Strategies:Name StrategyCollins Writng FolderReviews
All teachers will utilize Collins Writing Folders. The writing team will review theCollins Folders two or more times per year.
5.1.1. Strategy: Collins Writng Folder Reviews
Strategy Statement: All teachers will utilize Collins Writing Folders. The writing team will review theCollins Folders two or more times per year.
Selected Target AreasI.2.B.1 The school or program ensures that students have the supports they need to meet the requiredstandards. Teachers provide opportunities for students to use many and varied approaches to demonstratecompetency. The school or program continuously adapts curriculum, instruction, and assessments to meetits students' diverse and changing needs.I.2.B.3 Staff believe that active student engagement is a key feature of student success and there is anexpectation that all teachers will design lessons and assessments that engage their students.III.2.C.3 Teacher input is a key feature in the analysis of professional development initiatives. Results aresolicited and analyzed based upon the changes in classroom practice, implementation of the curricular andinstructional program, and the impact on student achievement.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 23 of 37
What research did you review to support the use of this strategy and action plan?
2011 MEAP scores * Collins Writing Folders * Pinnacle Insight data warehouse * data coach
List of Activities:Activity Begin Date End Date Staff ResponsibleMEAP related writing 2012-09-04 2013-06-28 All classroom teachers.
5.1.1.1. Activity: MEAP related writing
Activity Type: Other
Activity Description: Collins Writing Folders and Folder Reviews.
Planned staff responsible for implementing activity: All classroom teachers.
Actual staff responsible for implementing activity: All staff.
Planned Timeline: Begin Date - 2012-09-04, End Date - 2013-06-28
Actual Timeline: Begin Date - N/A, End Date - N/A
Fiscal Resources Needed for Activity:Resource Funding Source Planned
AmountActualAmount
Collins Writing Materials Substitute Costs General Funds 300.00 0.00
Leonidas School
SIP Page 24 of 37
Resource ProfileFunding Source Planned Amount Actual Amount
Title II Part A $4,350.00 $0.00
General Funds $6,800.00 $0.00
Leonidas School
SIP Page 25 of 37
Additional RequirementsComprehensive Needs Assessment
The comprehensive needs assessment (CNA) requirement is met by completing a School Data Profile/Analysis(SDP/A), School Process Profile, and Summary Report. The comprehensive needs assessment must be completedprior to creating a new plan or annually updating an existing school improvement plan.
Use the results of the comprehensive needs assessment to develop Goals/Objectives/Strategies and Activities.Ensure that the Gap Statements and Causes for Gaps included in the Goals information address all four measuresof data: student achievement data, school programs/process data, perceptions data (must include teachers andparents; student data is encouraged), and demographic data.
1. How was the comprehensive needs assessment conducted?
We analyzed the School Process Rubrics and addressed areas of need within the School Improvement Plan.The School Data Profile confirmed areas of need.
Curriculum Alignment that Corresponds to the Goals
1. Describe how the curriculum is aligned with State standards and how this alignment will help the school
meet the academic Goals. Describe the process for review and revision of the curriculum; evidence couldinclude a timeline for curriculum review or a description of the review process.
Curriculum is aligned with Common Core State Standards. Use of Curriculum Crafter, the Pinnacle Insightdata warehouse, and common assessment are incorporated into meeting academic goals.
2. Describe how decisions about curriculum, instruction and assessment are made at this school, and how all
stakeholders are involved in the process.
Our curriculum is data driven. Purchases in curriculum are made based on a as need basis. Considerationfor curriculum purchase begins in specific content areas and moves to a building consensus to a districtconsensus. This involves all stakeholders.
Staff Development
Use the results of the comprehensive needs assessment to create a written professional development plan thatidentifies ongoing, sustained professional development that is aligned to the Goals, Objectives and Strategies.These specific professional development activities must be included as Activities under the Goals section. Districtprofessional development activities that align to the school's CNA should also be included in the school-levelActivities section.
Alternative Measures of Assessment
Leonidas School
SIP Page 26 of 37
1. Describe the process for developing, or the alternative measures of assessment used, that will provide
authentic assessment of pupils' achievements, skills, and competencies.
Use Curriculum Crafter common assessments, MEAP, Terra Nova, ELPA, and research based interventionsmeasure students' achievement and skills.
Effective Use of Technology
1. Describe the methods for effective use of technology as a way of improving learning and delivery of
services and for integration of involving technology in the curriculum.
We acknowledge the importance of technology by implementing the following tools for teachers, as thestudent population is restricted from using technology based on religious reasons: Curriculum Crafter,Delta Math, Powerschool, and Powergrade.
Evaluation of the School Improvement Plan
1. Describe how the school annually evaluates the implementation of, and results achieved by, the SIP, using
data from the State's annual assessments and other indicators of academic achievement.
The School Improvement Plan is aligned around our data. The improvement team and core curriculumcommittees analyze the data and align instruction to fit the needs of our student population. We refer toMEAP data on an annual basis and local assessment to monitor student progress. Trends in studentperformance are monitored and used to identify the strengths / weaknesses in our curriculum and / orinstruction.
2. Describe how school and student information and progress will be shared with all stakeholders in a language
that they can understand.
Student progress is presented through staff meetings, committee meetings and board meetings. Studentprogress is presented using a variety of multimedia graphs, charts, etc... Parents have access to studentprogress, they are provided with mid-term and regular progress reports.
Building Level Decision-Making
1. Describe how school stakeholders are engaged in the decision-making process, including, but not limited tothe development of the Goals, Objectives, Strategies and Activities included in the school improvementplan. School board members, school building administrators, teachers and other school employees, pupils,parents of pupils attending that school, parents of pupils attending that school, and other residents of theschool district shall be invited and allowed to voluntarily participate in the development, review andevaluation of the district's school improvement plans.
Stakeholders are responsible for selected areas of the school improvement plan. Curriculum committees
Leonidas School
SIP Page 27 of 37
analyze MEAP and local data and a representative of each committee serves on the School ImprovementTeam. The Improvement team aligns the school goals based upon the data. Our ISD staff and our datacoach have been actively involved in providing staff with information to use the data to guide instruction.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 28 of 37
AssurancesEdYES!
1. Literacy and math are tested annually in grades 1-5 (MCL 380.1280b)
Response: Yes
Comments:
2. Our school published a fully compliant annual report. (The Annual Education Report (AER) satisfies this).
If yes, please provide a link to the report on your website in the comments field (if applicable).
Response: Yes
Comments:
Educational Development Plan (EDP)
1. Our school has the 8th grade parent approved Educational Development Plans (EDPs) on file.
Response: No
Comments: Our school has an Amish population and it is their belief that they do not attend school after
grade eight.
2. Our school reviews and annually updates the EDPs to ensure academic course work alignment.
Response: No
Comments: Our school has an Amish population and they do not attend school after grade eight.
Health and Safety (HSAT)
The following assurances come directly from the Healthy School Action Tool (HSAT) Assessment(http://www.mihealthtools.org/hsat), an online tool for school buildings to assess their school healthenvironments. If your school completed the HSAT in the past year, you may refer back to your report to answerthe following assurances. Responses to these assurances are necessary - whether you've completed the HSAT ornot. These assurances are designed to help school improvement teams think about conditions for learning in theirschool, specifically related to student health and safety, and develop strategies in their school improvement plan toaddress any identified needs.
1. Our School has a written policy on school safety that supports proactive, preventative approaches to ensure
a safe school environment.
Response: Written policy, fully implemented
Leonidas School
SIP Page 29 of 37
Comments:
2. All teachers in our school have received professional development in management techniques to create
calm, orderly classrooms.
Response: Yes
Comments:
3. Our school communicates all of our health and safety policies to students, staff, substitute teachers, parents
and visitors through the parent handbook or newsletter at least once a year.
Response: Yes
Comments: The Student Handbook contains this information.
4. Our school has used data from a student health/safety assessment at least once in the past two years to assist
in planning actions that will improve our school's environment and/or to determine the impact of changesthat we have made on student attitudes and behaviors.
Response: Yes
Comments: MiPHY, Health/Safety Committee
5. Our school has taken action on the Michigan State Board of Education Policy on Comprehensive School
Health Education.
Response: Reviewed policy, but not yet adopted
Comments:
6. All teachers who provide health education instruction received annual professional development/continuing
education specifically related to health education.
Response: Yes
Comments:
7. The health education curriculum used in our school is the Michigan Model for Health® Curriculum.
Response: No, but use a health education curriculum
Comments:
8. The health education curriculum used in our school involves student interaction with their families and their
community.
Response: No
Comments:
Leonidas School
SIP Page 30 of 37
9. Our school has taken action on the Michigan State Board of Education Policy on Quality Physical
Education.
Response: No action taken
Comments: Classroom teachers teach PE as this is a basic skills school.
10. At our school, physical education teachers annually participate in professional development specific to
physical education.
Response: No
Comments: The classroom teachers are the PE teachers.
11. The physical education curriculum used in our school is:
Response: Other curriculum
Comments: Use of the state standards.
12. At least three times during the past 12 months, our school offered programs, activities or events for
families about physical activity.
Response: Yes
Comments:
13. Our school offers the following amount of total weekly minutes of physical education throughout the year.
Response: 150 minutes or more at elementary level, 225 minutes or more at middle/high level
Comments:
14. Our school has taken action on the Michigan State Board of Education Policy on Nutrition Standards.
Response: Adopted policy, fully implemented
Comments:
15. The food service director/manager participated in professional development related to food or nutrition
during the past 12 months.
Response: Yes
Comments:
16. The food service director/manager supports/reinforces in the cafeteria what is taught in health education.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 31 of 37
Response: Yes
Comments:
17. During the past 12 months, our school collected information from parents to help evaluate/improve school
meals or foods offered a la carte, in concessions, school stores, vending machines, or as a part of classroomcelebrations/parties or at school events.
Response: Yes
Comments: Chartwell Survey
18. Our school makes a good faith effort to ensure that federally reimbursable school nutrition programs are
the main source of nutrition at school rather than vending or a la carte.
Response: Yes
Comments:
19. Our school has a health services provider or school nurse accessible to students.
Response: No
Comments:
20. Our school has a written policy on school safety that involves parents, and broader community, in
collaborative efforts to help ensure a safe school environment.
Response: Written policy, fully implemented
Comments: Policy 8400
21. Our school has a system in place for collecting relevant student medical information.
Response: Yes
Comments:
22. Our school has taken action on the Michigan State Board of Education Positive Behavior Support Policy.
Response: Reviewed policy, but not yet adopted
Comments:
23. During the past 12 months, the school counseling staff has provided professional development to school
health staff about identification and referral of students related to violence and suicide prevention.
Response: No
Comments: We do not have a health staff but teachers and parapros have been informed.
Leonidas School
SIP Page 32 of 37
24. During the past 12 months, the school counselor/psychologist/social worker offered information to students
(presentations, materials, individual or group counseling activities, events) about bullying, harassment andother peer to peer aggression.
Response: Yes
Comments: Teachers make presentations.
25. During the past 12 months, the school counselor/psychologist/social worker has collaborated with
appropriate school staff or community agencies to implement programs or activities related to bullying,harassment and other peer to peer aggression.
Response: No
Comments: Our school does not have this type of support staff but the teachers address bullying,
harassment and other peer to peer aggression.
26. During the past 12 months, the school counseling staff identified students who are at risk of being victims
or perpetrators of violence.
Response: No
Comments: The teachers are the primary identifiers.
27. Our school's mission statement includes the support of employee health and safety.
Response: Yes
Comments:
28. During the past year, our school supported staff participation in health promotion programs by having a
budget for staff health promotion.
Response: No
Comments:
29. During the past year, our school supported staff in healthy eating by providing healthy food choices at staff
meetings.
Response: No
Comments:
30. Our school has a written family involvement policy that advocates for strong connections between the
home, school and the community as a means of reducing barriers to student achievement.
Response: Written Policy, but not fully implemented
Comments: Our district utilizes a district policy so that there is no conflict between building and district
Leonidas School
SIP Page 33 of 37
operations.
31. Our school has a parent education program.
Response: Yes
Comments:
32. During the past 12 months, our school collected information from parents to help evaluate/improve school
health education in our school.
Response: No
Comments:
33. During non school hours the community has access to indoor facilities for physical activity (such as gym,
weight room, hallway for walking, pool, basketball court).
Response: Access to no indoor facilities
Comments:
Leonidas School
SIP Page 34 of 37
StakeholdersList of names, positions and e-mail addresses of the stakeholders (staff, parents, community/business membersand, as appropriate, students) who were involved in the planning, design, monitoring, and evaluation of this plan.
Title First Name Last Name Position E-mailMr. Lloyd Kirby Superintendent [email protected]. R. Mitch Miller Principal [email protected]
Mrs. Colleen SaxmanGrants/CurriculumCoordin
Ms. Becky GraySchoolImprovementRepres
Mrs. Sharon Wickey Teacher [email protected]. Kylie Bowen Teacher [email protected]
Leonidas School
SIP Page 35 of 37
Statement of Non-Discrimination
Federal Office for Civil Rights
The institution complies with all federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination and with all requirementsand regulations of the U.S. Department of Education. It is the policy of this school that no person on the basis ofrace, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, age, gender, height, weight, marital status or disability shall besubjected to discrimination in any program, service or activity for which the district/school is responsible, or forwhich it receives financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Education.
Contact Information
Schools/Districts are required to designate an employee to coordinate efforts to comply with and carry out non-discrimination responsibilities.
Name/Position: Mitch Miller, Principal
Address: 328 E. State St.
Telephone Number: 269-432-2121
References
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964The Age Discrimination Act of 1975The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990Elliott-Larsen prohibits discrimination against religion
Leonidas School
SIP Page 36 of 37