Date post: | 16-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dinhkhuong |
View: | 224 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Evaluation & Accountability Data Analysis, Reporting, and Research Services https://mydata.dallasisd.org [email protected] Published July 27, 2011
UMPHREY LEE
School Number 175
Table of Contents2011-12 Data Packet: Standard Issue
2. Contents .................. Table of Contents 3. Notes ....................... Notes and Data Descriptions
STUDENTS AND STAFF5. Summary ................. Summary of Student and Teacher Statistics 6. Enrollment (1) .......... Enrollment Statistics by Ethnicity
7. Enrollment (2) .......... Enrollment Statistics by Select Student Group 8. Attendance .............. Student Attendance Statistics
9. Teachers ................. Teacher Statistics
TAKS / TAKS (ACCOMMODATED)10. TAKS Read ............. TAKS/TAKS(Acc) Reading 14. TAKS Math .............. TAKS/TAKS(Acc) Mathematics
18. TAKS Writing ........... TAKS/TAKS(Acc) Writing 22. TAKS Science ......... TAKS/TAKS(Acc) Science
26. TAKS (SP) Read ..... Spanish TAKS/TAKS(Acc) Reading 30. TAKS (SP) Writing ... Spanish TAKS/TAKS(Acc) Writing
TAKS-MODIFIED34. TAKS-M Read ......... TAKS-M Reading/ELA 38. TAKS-M Math .......... TAKS-M Mathematics
ITBS / LOGRAMOS43. ITBS Read ............... ITBS Reading 45. ITBS Math ............... ITBS Mathematics
49. LOG Read ............... Logramos Reading
ENGLISH PROFICIENCY51. WMLS ...................... Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey 52. TELPAS ................... Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_CONTENTS 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 2
Notes, Definitions, and Data DescriptionsNotes
Student percentages are computed as the percentage of total student enrollment.•
Additional statistics are available in ENROLLMENT and TEACHER reports.•
“Economically disadvantaged” students are those who qualify for free or reduced-price lunch through the federal government's program.•Teacher demographics and assignments are those reported to the TEA in the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission for the district.•
2010-11 SCHOOL SUMMARY
Race/ethnic categories are based on the newest federal standards for ethinicity and race reporting, though some categories have been combined because of small group sizes. Students reporting their ethinicity as “Hispanic” are not counted in any race category.
•
Statistics are based on the school's enrollment at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period.•
“Economically disadvantaged” students are those receiving free or reduced-price lunches.•
The “retention rate” is the percentage of students in the same grade at the end of the fifth six-weeks grading period for both 2009-10 and 2010-11.•“New” students were new to the district in 2010-11. They are counted as new if not enrolled in a district campus before the last day of the 2009-10 school year.•
ENROLLMENT
For 2010-11, race/ethnic categories are based on the newest federal standards for ethinicity and race reporting, though some categories have been combined because of small group sizes; students reporting their ethinicity as “Hispanic” are not counted in any race category. For prior years, race/ethnicity is based on the previous categories.
•
• Statistics are based on student attendance through the end of the sixth six-weeks grading period (the end of the school year).• “Average daily membership” is the total number of school days students were ENROLLED divided by the number of school days in the year.• The “average daily attendance” number (N) is the total number of school days students were IN ATTENDANCE divided by the number of school days in the year. The “average
daily attendance” percentage (%) is the average attendance rate. For each student, the number of days attended is divided by the number of days enrolled. This rate is then averaged across students.
• The number (N) of “yearly transactions” is the total number of transfer and withdrawal transactions in the school year. The percentage (%) is the number of transactions divided by “average daily membership,” which gives (on average) the percentage of the membership associated with a transaction.
• “Continuously enrolled” students are enrolled for a minimum number of instructional days between the beginning of the school year and the first day of the main TAKS testing period. This number varies from 125 to 130 depending on the calendar in a particular school year.
• The “stability rate” is the number of continuously enrolled students divided by “average daily membership.”
ATTENDANCE
• Teacher demographics and assignments are those reported to the TEA in the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission for the district.
TEACHERS
• Teacher absences counted towards the average DO NOT include vacation days (coded as VAC in personnel database).• Retention rate for a school year is computed with numerator “# teachers assigned to the school both that year and the year prior” and denominator “# of teachers assigned to
the school for the prior year”. That is, the retention rate is the percentage of the prior year's teachers who continued at the school.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_NOTES 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 3
Notes, Definitions, and Data DescriptionsNotes
Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested.••
•
••
Student group assignments are those reported to the TEA in the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) submission for the district.
Cell shading for percentage meeting standard is based on the AEIS or AYP minimum requirement for 2012, whichever is higher for the subject test.
Statistics on the objective performance summaries are averages for all students in the grade indicated.An “average percentage correct” is computed as follows: for each student, divide the number of items correctly answered by the total number of items in the test section, then compute the average percentage for all students. For written compositions, an “average composition rating” is presented. TAKS compositions are rated on a scale of 1 to 4.
• READING and MATHEMATICS statistics for SSI grades (3, 5, 8) in any year are based on scores cumulative through the second administration.
• TAKS statistics are based on both TAKS and TAKS-Accommodated results. TAKS-M statistics are based exclusively on TAKS-M results.
TAKS and TAKS-Modified
••
Cells marked with an asterisk (*) indicate five or fewer students were tested. Blank cells indicate no students were tested.Student group assignments are based on demographic data in the Dallas ISD student database.
• Kindergarten ITBS reading statistics are based on the Reading Profile Total (a combination of the Vocabulary, Word Analysis, and Listening subtests) for all years available. All other grades' ITBS reading statistics, and Logramos reading statistics for all grades, are based on Reading Total results. (Reading Total results are not available with use of the ITBS level 5R form administered in kindergarten.) “Number tested” statistics include kindergarten.
• Kindergarten ITBS mathematics statistics are based on the Mathematics subtest. All other grades' statistics reflect Mathematics Total results. (Mathematics Total summaries are not available with use of the ITBS level 5R form administered in kindergarten.) “Number tested” statistics include kindergarten.
• Mathematics Total results used for data packets are combinations of the Mathematics Concepts, Problems, and Computation subtest results. For schools who did not administer Mathematics Concepts or Mathematics Problems to their students, Mathematics Computation statistics are provided separately.
SCE COMPLIANCE and ITBS / ITED / LOGRAMOS
•
• If a student's composite rating did not increase at least one level from 2010 to 2011, the TEA did not report the 2010 composite rating.
Students are counted as having tested if any one of the four domains is rated. Because a TELPAS composite rating is not assigned to a student unless all four domains are rated, the number of TELPAS composite ratings may be smaller than the number tested.
• If a student is rated as advanced high in 2011, the TEA does not differentiate between the advanced and advanced high levels from 2010.
TELPAS
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_NOTES 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 4
Summary 2010-11 Group Summary Statistics
Grade
STUDENT ENROLLMENT
Enrollment
PK 44
KN 69
1 85
2 81
3 92
4 93
5 94
ALL 558
STUDENT AND TEACHER RACE/ETHNICITY
Students
Number Percent Number PercentEthnicity/Race
Black/African American
American Indian/Alaska Native
Asian/Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
Hispanic
White
Multiple
388 69.5
0 0.0
0 0.0
168 30.1
1 0.2
29 69.0
7 16.7
6 14.3
0 0.0
* *
* *
1 0.2
SELECT STUDENT GROUP ENROLLMENT
Number PercentGroup
Economically disadvantaged
Limited English proficient (LEP)
Special education
535 95.9
134 24.0
28 5.0
*For teachers, “Other” category includes American Indican/Alaska Native and Asian/Haw aiian/Pacif ic Islander.
Not reported (students only) — —0 0.0
Other* (teachers only) 0 0.0— —
Talented and Gifted (TAG) 19 3.4
At-Risk 303 54.3
Teachers
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_SUMMARY 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 5
N %
Asian
%NN %%
Hispanic
N N %Grade Year
African American American Indian
Enrollment
White
Enrolllment Statistics by Race/EthnicityEnrollment (1)
N %
Multiple category
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
46.3
51.2
59.1
19
21
26
51.2
48.8
40.9
21
20
18
2.4
0.0
0.0
1
0
0
PK
44
41
41 —
—
0.0
—
—
0
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
18.7
29.7
33.3
14
33
23
81.3
70.3
66.7
61
78
46
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
KN
69
111
75 —
—
0.0
—
—
0
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
23.9
22.5
31.8
27
20
27
75.2
77.5
68.2
85
69
58
0.9
0.0
0.0
1
0
0
1
85
89
113 —
—
0.0
—
—
0
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
27.3
21.1
24.7
27
24
20
72.7
78.9
74.1
72
90
60
0.0
0.0
1.2
0
0
1
2
81
114
99 —
—
0.0
—
—
0
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
13.5
30.0
26.1
14
30
24
86.5
70.0
73.9
90
70
68
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
3
92
100
104 —
—
0.0
—
—
0
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0
1
0
15.2
13.3
31.2
15
14
29
84.8
85.7
68.8
84
90
64
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
4
93
105
99 —
—
0.0
—
—
0
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
14.6
22.4
20.2
12
24
19
85.4
77.6
78.7
70
83
74
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
5
94
107
82 —
—
1.1
—
—
1
2011
2009
2010
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0
1
0
21.0
24.9
30.1
131
166
168
78.7
75.0
69.5
492
500
388
0.3
0.0
0.2
2
0
1
PK-5
558
667
625 —
—
0.2
—
—
1
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ENROLL_ETH 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 6
N %
At RIsk New (to District)
N %
TAG
N %
Economically Disadvantaged
Grade Year
LEP Special Education
N % N % N %
Retention Rate (%)
Enrollment
Enrollment Statistics by Select Student GroupEnrollment (2)
36.6
48.8
52.3
15
20
23
100.0
100.0
100.0
PK
2011 44
41
41 100.0
100.0
93.2
41
41
41
39.0
46.3
47.7
16
19
21
0.0
4.9
0.0
0
2
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2009
2010
41
41
44
44.0
55.0
60.9
33
61
42
50.7
52.3
44.9
KN
2011 69
111
75 94.7
97.3
94.2
71
108
65
14.7
23.4
24.6
11
26
17
1.3
0.9
1.4
1
1
1
1.3
7.2
0.0
1
8
0
1.3
0.0
0.0
2009
2010
38
58
31
51.3
49.4
50.6
58
44
43
19.5
12.4
14.1
1
2011 85
89
113 94.7
94.4
98.8
107
84
84
18.6
21.3
25.9
21
19
22
1.8
2.2
0.0
2
2
0
0.9
2.2
3.5
1
2
3
7.1
5.6
1.2
2009
2010
22
11
12
74.7
77.2
70.4
74
88
57
18.2
10.5
16.0
2
2011 81
114
99 99.0
98.2
95.1
98
112
77
24.2
17.5
24.7
24
20
20
9.1
3.5
2.5
9
4
2
4.0
1.8
1.2
4
2
1
6.1
4.4
1.2
2009
2010
18
12
13
68.3
72.0
59.8
71
72
55
8.7
15.0
10.9
3
2011 92
100
104 94.2
97.0
97.8
98
97
90
8.7
26.0
16.3
9
26
15
11.5
11.0
7.6
12
11
7
12.5
3.0
2.2
13
3
2
2.9
1.0
3.3
2009
2010
9
15
10
42.4
36.2
46.2
42
38
43
12.1
10.5
15.1
4
2011 93
105
99 98.0
94.3
96.8
97
99
90
7.1
10.5
24.7
7
11
23
13.1
10.5
8.6
13
11
8
7.1
10.5
2.2
7
11
2
1.0
0.0
0.0
2009
2010
12
11
14
58.5
53.3
42.6
48
57
40
12.2
6.5
9.6
5
2011 94
107
82 92.7
94.4
93.6
76
101
88
4.9
11.2
17.0
4
12
16
12.2
11.2
10.6
10
12
10
4.9
5.6
11.7
4
6
11
1.2
2.8
0.0
2009
2010
10
7
9
54.6
57.0
54.3
341
380
303
25.1
23.2
23.8
PK-5
2011 558
667
625 95.7
96.3
95.9
598
642
535
14.7
19.9
24.0
92
133
134
9.4
6.4
5.0
59
43
28
4.8
4.8
3.4
30
32
19
4.2
2.1
0.9
2009
2010
157
155
133
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ENROLL_OTH 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 7
Stability Rate (%)
Campus
ContinuouslyEnrolled (N)
Campus DistrictCampus (N)Campus
Average DailyMembership (N)
Average Daily Attendance Yearly TransactionsGrade Year
Campus (N) Campus (%)District District (N) District (%) Campus (%) District (%) District
Student Attendance StatisticsAttendance
72.6
80.5
77.8
56
54
83
11,501
11,602
11,233
30
20
46KN
2009 94.472.8 38.9 22.3
2010
2011 95.163.8 29.8 21.5
94.1100.4 43.1 21.7
13,515.0
13,210.6
13,234.2
95.7
95.7
95.3
12,939.1
12,645.0
12,616.4
85.1
87.8
84.9
77.2
67.1
106.7
80.0
80.6
74.7
92
68
65
12,300
12,047
11,978
45
16
311
2009 95.1109.4 39.1 20.5
2010
2011 95.080.2 19.0 19.0
94.281.9 35.6 20.3
14,250.8
13,458.2
13,848.4
96.3
96.4
95.9
13,719.9
12,967.0
13,286.3
86.3
89.5
86.5
115.0
84.4
87.0
74.4
79.6
79.4
74
63
88
12,231
11,853
11,794
42
29
342
2009 95.695.1 42.2 18.5
2010
2011 96.076.0 36.6 17.1
95.2105.6 30.7 19.2
13,950.1
13,012.8
13,440.8
96.8
96.8
96.3
13,499.0
12,592.7
12,947.4
87.7
91.1
87.7
99.5
79.2
110.9
80.9
83.4
80.4
82
74
79
11,634
11,604
11,815
32
32
393
2009 95.897.1 31.6 18.2
2010
2011 96.085.2 36.1 16.7
95.694.0 39.7 17.8
13,095.5
12,619.0
13,291.1
97.1
97.1
96.7
12,710.6
12,254.0
12,853.9
88.8
92.0
88.9
101.4
88.7
98.3
76.3
84.5
78.3
77
74
82
10,731
11,544
10,987
38
25
314
2009 96.197.1 37.6 17.9
2010
2011 96.484.4 28.5 15.7
95.9100.4 29.6 17.3
12,156.4
12,506.4
12,299.7
97.0
97.1
96.8
11,789.9
12,149.9
11,900.0
88.3
92.3
89.3
101.0
87.6
104.7
81.7
96.3
76.5
69
86
80
10,563
10,892
10,453
27
9
345
2009 96.881.8 32.0 17.3
2010
2011 97.086.6 10.1 8.3
96.4100.9 32.5 17.1
11,903.5
11,742.5
11,687.8
97.1
97.2
96.8
11,552.9
11,419.3
11,310.1
88.7
92.8
89.4
84.5
89.3
104.6
80.1
84.4
77.9
489
419
477
76,517
69,542
68,260
274
131
215KN-5
2009 95.5582.9 44.9 30.6
2010
2011 96.0476.3 26.4 16.6
95.3583.2 35.1 18.9
83,476.5
76,549.5
77,802.0
96.5
96.7
96.3
80,586.5
74,027.9
74,914.0
91.7
90.8
87.7
610.3
496.3
612.2
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ATTENDANCE 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 8
Teacher StatisticsTeachers
0.0
Percentage
0Beginning (0)
161 - 5
106 - 10
511 - 20
11More than 20
Years Number
95.2
NA
NA
0
69.029
31.013
0.0
16.77
69.029
14.36White
African American
Hispanic
Multiple categories
Male
Female
5.6
8.1
Number PercentageEthnicity/Race
DISTRIBUTIONS YEARS EXPERIENCE
Teachers: 42
5.5
Average Absences
RetentionRate
38.1
23.8
11.9
26.2
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
Number PercentageGender
7.131
2.412
11.953
21.491-3
9.544
7.135
33More than 3 78.6
0 0.0Other
ATTENDANCE / RETENTION
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TEACHER 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 9
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READING
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS Read (1)
67.6 78.8
89.6 88.4
76.5 81.6
82.02011 72.6 75.0 72.9 * * 72.9 7070.0
3
87.32009 88.5 * 88.2 100.0 * 89.0 9188.3
85.42010 77.6 * 80.9 42.9 * 79.2 7271.7
90.0 92.1
56.1 78.4
90.7 83.3
78.62011 91.5 87.5 90.5 * * 91.2 6891.3
4
75.82009 64.9 60.0 62.5 * 28.6 64.2 9541.0
77.92010 87.2 * 86.9 85.7 * 86.8 9172.4
94.6 92.1
75.7 82.1
81.1 93.6
89.02011 92.9 * 93.0 * * 93.3 7584.6
5
82.92009 75.8 100.0 80.0 * * 78.2 7876.6
86.12010 88.6 81.0 87.0 * 62.5 87.0 10083.7
83.7 88.1
72.5 83.2
83.1 86.5
83.62011 85.9 85.0 85.3 90.9 85.7 85.9 21379.8
3-5
81.52009 77.0 80.0 76.5 70.6 54.5 76.9 26471.9
83.42010 84.9 83.3 85.2 70.6 66.7 84.8 26376.6
0 104 109
0 142 119
0 130 133
22,1812011 0 20191 204 11 7 21389
28,1262009 0 30230 243 17 11 264146
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
24,7512010 0 30232 244 17 12 263124
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 70 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_read_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 10
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READINGTAKS Read (2)
12 7
5 5
8 7
1,2142011 17 2 19 * * 19 7012
3
9602009 10 * 10 0 * 10 917
1,0392010 15 * 13 4 * 15 7213
3 3
25 8
4 8
1,5062011 5 1 6 * * 6 682
4
2,4492009 27 6 33 * 5 34 9523
1,6402010 11 * 11 1 * 12 918
2 3
9 7
10 3
9192011 5 * 5 * * 5 754
5
1,7932009 16 0 14 * * 17 7811
1,4272010 9 4 12 * 3 13 1008
17 13
39 20
22 18
3,6392011 27 3 30 1 1 30 21318
3-5
5,2022009 53 6 57 5 5 61 26441
4,1062010 35 5 36 5 4 40 26329
0 104 109
0 142 119
0 130 133
22,1812011 0 20191 204 11 7 21389
28,1262009 0 30230 243 17 11 264146
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
24,7512010 0 30232 244 17 12 263124
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_read_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 11
Basic UnderstandingApplying Knowledgeof Literary Elements
Using Strategiesto Analyze
Applying Critical-Thinking Skills
YearGrade
OBJECTIVE
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READINGTAKS Read (3)
2011 73.9 69.4 68.1 67.9
2009
2010
78.9 78.5 77.7 82.6
3 77.9 71.6 73.8 71.7
2011 85.4 86.8 89.3 78.1
2009
2010
80.1 72.5 69.0 73.6
4 80.9 83.1 83.8 80.2
2011 88.9 87.7 86.5 82.4
2009
2010
76.6 77.2 77.9 70.7
5 84.1 79.9 79.3 75.6
2011 82.9 81.4 81.3 76.2
2009
2010
78.6 76.0 74.6 75.8
3-5 81.3 78.7 79.4 76.1
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_read_3_obj_elem 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 12
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READING
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS Read (4)
10.8 21.2
31.3 34.9
29.4 26.3
33.62011 14.5 25.0 15.7 * * 15.7 7010.0
3
34.12009 33.3 * 32.9 14.3 * 33.0 9118.3
37.12010 25.4 * 29.4 0.0 * 27.8 7226.1
50.0 34.2
19.3 18.9
25.6 14.6
27.72011 40.7 50.0 41.3 * * 41.2 6821.7
4
18.42009 19.5 13.3 18.2 * 14.3 18.9 957.7
19.42010 19.8 * 20.2 0.0 * 19.8 910.0
37.8 44.7
2.7 10.3
11.3 12.8
28.12011 38.6 * 42.3 * * 41.3 7515.4
5
18.52009 6.1 9.1 7.1 * * 6.4 784.3
23.62010 12.7 9.5 12.0 * 0.0 12.0 1006.1
31.7 33.9
19.0 21.8
20.8 17.3
29.72011 31.4 50.0 32.8 0.0 28.6 32.9 21314.6
3-5
22.72009 20.9 13.3 20.2 11.8 9.1 20.1 26411.0
26.22010 19.0 20.0 19.7 5.9 16.7 19.0 26312.1
0 104 109
0 142 119
0 130 133
22,1812011 0 20191 204 11 7 21389
28,1262009 0 30230 243 17 11 264146
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
24,7512010 0 30232 244 17 12 263124
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknow ledgment Standard for 2010-11.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_read_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 13
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhiteAfricanAmer
HispanicEcon
DisadvSpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGradeNumber Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: MATHEMATICS
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS Math (1)
79.6 79.5
69.2 68.8
69.4 61.7
80.72011 79.7 79.2 80.5 * 87.5 79.5 8883.6
3
77.32009 67.8 76.9 68.1 33.3 75.0 69.0 10063.2
78.22010 65.7 65.5 65.9 25.0 64.0 65.6 9662.7
84.6 81.6
60.7 70.3
77.8 78.8
82.62011 83.1 82.1 82.9 * 77.3 83.0 8876.2
4
79.42009 63.6 64.3 63.2 * 57.1 64.5 9344.7
81.82010 75.9 92.3 78.0 33.3 90.0 78.4 9761.5
95.6 92.9
86.1 89.5
96.2 93.6
88.72011 93.0 100.0 94.0 * 100.0 94.3 8789.2
5
87.02009 87.5 90.0 86.6 * * 87.8 7480.9
87.72010 93.7 100.0 94.5 * 100.0 94.9 9993.9
86.5 84.6
70.1 75.6
81.5 78.1
83.92011 85.6 85.1 85.7 76.9 86.3 85.6 26382.8
3-5
81.02009 71.9 75.7 71.4 43.8 66.7 72.7 26764.1
82.32010 79.0 82.3 79.5 41.2 76.7 79.8 29274.6
0 133 130
0 144 123
0 146 146
35,6422011 0 67194 252 13 51 263134
33,5462009 0 37228 248 16 18 267153
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
34,8342010 0 62229 273 17 43 292126
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 65 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_math_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 14
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: MATHEMATICS
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
TAKS Math (2)
2011
2009
2010
10 8
16 15
15 18
2,37013 5 17 * 2 18 889
3
2,78128 3 30 6 2 31 10025
2,73923 10 31 6 9 33 9619
2011
2009
2010
6 9
22 11
10 11
2,10010 5 14 * 5 15 8810
4
2,19628 5 32 * 3 33 9321
2,10120 1 20 4 1 21 9710
2011
2009
2010
2 3
5 4
2 3
1,2745 0 5 * 0 5 874
5
1,3868 1 9 * * 9 749
1,3145 0 5 * 0 5 993
2011
2009
2010
18 20
43 30
27 32
5,74428 10 36 3 7 38 26323
3-5
6,36364 9 71 9 6 73 26755
6,15448 11 56 10 10 59 29232
0 133 130
0 144 123
0 146 146
35,6422011 0 67194 252 13 51 263134
33,5462009 0 37228 248 16 18 267153
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
34,8342010 0 62229 273 17 43 292126
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_math_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 15
Numbers, Operations,and Quantitative
Reasoning
Patterns,Relationships, and
Algebraic Reasoning
Geometry andSpatial Reasoning
Concepts and Usesof Measurement
Probability andStatistics
MathematicalProcesses and Tools
YearGrade
OBJECTIVE
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: MATHEMATICS
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
TAKS Math (3)
2011 78.6 75.6 84.5 82.2 84.9 69.5
2009 71.7 71.3 78.0 75.5 77.3
3
60.3
2010 68.4 67.9 67.4 67.7 72.4 60.9
2011 84.2 85.4 83.1 76.7 84.4 79.5
2009 77.1 67.0 73.8 71.7 72.3
4
64.4
2010 82.0 78.9 75.9 71.8 72.7 78.7
2011 85.7 84.6 84.4 82.8 85.6 83.8
2009 80.7 79.2 85.9 78.2 84.5
5
76.9
2010 82.1 80.2 78.4 83.4 78.8 83.8
2011 82.8 81.8 84.0 80.5 85.0 77.6
2009 76.1 72.0 78.7 74.9 77.5
3-5
66.3
2010 77.6 75.7 73.9 74.4 74.7 74.6
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_math_3_obj_elem 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 16
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: MATHEMATICS
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS Math (4)
32.7 15.4
19.2 14.6
10.2 4.3
24.42011 20.3 37.5 25.3 * 43.8 25.0 8825.5
3
29.02009 16.1 23.1 17.0 11.1 25.0 17.0 1008.8
21.32010 6.0 10.3 7.7 0.0 12.0 7.3 963.9
46.2 38.8
17.9 29.7
28.9 25.0
31.32011 42.4 39.3 41.5 * 27.3 42.0 8828.6
4
31.62009 24.7 7.1 20.7 * 14.3 22.6 9310.5
29.12010 24.1 46.2 25.3 0.0 40.0 26.8 977.7
44.4 42.9
25.0 36.8
25.0 19.1
32.52011 36.6 73.3 43.4 * 76.9 43.7 8740.5
5
38.42009 29.7 40.0 32.8 * * 31.1 7412.8
34.52010 22.8 20.0 20.9 * 0.0 22.2 9914.3
40.6 33.1
20.1 26.0
21.2 16.4
29.32011 33.0 46.3 36.5 7.7 45.1 36.9 26330.6
3-5
32.82009 22.8 21.6 22.6 12.5 16.7 22.8 26710.5
27.92010 18.3 21.0 17.9 0.0 16.3 18.8 2928.7
0 133 130
0 144 123
0 146 146
35,6422011 0 67194 252 13 51 263134
33,5462009 0 37228 248 16 18 267153
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
34,8342010 0 62229 273 17 43 292126
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknow ledgment Standard for 2010-11.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_math_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 17
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS Writing (1)
91.2 97.5
87.0 94.1
74.4 89.6
86.92011 94.9 92.9 94.2 57.1 87.5 94.6 7486.7
4
87.42009 90.5 85.7 89.4 28.6 66.7 86.8 9175.7
89.82010 82.4 * 81.2 33.3 * 82.4 9156.7
0 34 40
0 54 34
0 43 48
6,9352011 0 1459 69 7 8 7430
10,0322009 0 1474 85 7 6 9137
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 4
7,2942010 0 585 85 6 2 9130
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 70 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_write_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 18
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
TAKS Writing (2)
3 1
7 2
11 5
9082011 3 1 4 3 1 4 744
4
1,2642009 7 2 9 5 2 12 919
7442010 15 * 16 4 * 16 9113
0 34 40
0 54 34
0 43 48
6,9352011 0 1459 69 7 8 7430
10,0322009 0 1474 85 7 6 9137
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 4
7,2942010 0 585 85 6 2 9130
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_write_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 19
Written Composition:Effectiveness / Command
of Conventions¹
AppropriateOrganization of Ideas
Correct and EffectiveSentence Construction
Standard Usage andAppropriate Word Choice
Proofreading forPunctuation, Capitalization,
and SpellingYearGrade
OBJECTIVE
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
TAKS Writing (3)
2011 3.0 84.8 89.9 93.1 88.2
2009 2.5 78.3 76.4 79.4 89.4
4 2010 2.5 75.3 75.8 78.8 80.9
¹Average rating on w ritten composition. TAKS compositions are rated on a scale of 1 to 4.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_write_3_obj 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 20
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS Writing (4)
61.8 67.5
35.2 35.3
23.3 37.5
22.42011 67.8 50.0 65.2 14.3 25.0 64.9 7440.0
4
21.02009 35.1 35.7 34.1 14.3 16.7 34.1 918.1
23.82010 29.4 * 31.8 0.0 * 30.8 916.7
0 34 40
0 54 34
0 43 48
6,9352011 0 1459 69 7 8 7430
10,0322009 0 1474 85 7 6 9137
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 4
7,2942010 0 585 85 6 2 9130
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknow ledgment Standard for 2010-11.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_write_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 21
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: SCIENCE
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS Science (1)
93.5 93.0
58.3 54.1
80.4 95.7
80.92011 91.5 100.0 92.9 85.7 100.0 93.3 8990.0
5
75.92009 53.2 70.0 54.7 * * 56.2 7339.5
81.42010 85.2 95.5 86.5 88.9 90.9 87.4 10380.8
0 46 43
0 36 37
0 56 46
10,1762011 0 1771 85 7 14 8940
10,5502009 0 1062 64 5 3 7343
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 5
10,5762010 0 2281 96 9 11 10352
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 60 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_sc_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 22
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: SCIENCE
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
TAKS Science (2)
3 3
15 17
11 2
1,9422011 6 0 6 1 0 6 894
5
2,5422009 29 3 29 * * 32 7326
1,9652010 12 1 13 1 1 13 10310
0 46 43
0 36 37
0 56 46
10,1762011 0 1771 85 7 14 8940
10,5502009 0 1062 64 5 3 7343
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 5
10,5762010 0 2281 96 9 11 10352
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_sc_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 23
Nature of Science Life Sciences Physical Sciences Earth SciencesYearGrade
OBJECTIVE
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: SCIENCE
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
TAKS Science (3)
2011 89.1 90.4 90.6 85.5
2009 80.1 82.5 75.6 61.3
5 2010 85.4 88.9 86.6 79.9
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_sc_3_obj_elem 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 24
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: SCIENCE
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS Science (4)
58.7 48.8
25.0 5.4
41.1 39.1
34.02011 47.9 76.5 54.1 14.3 85.7 53.9 8947.5
5
29.12009 11.3 30.0 15.6 * * 15.1 737.0
32.82010 38.3 45.5 39.6 11.1 36.4 39.8 10332.7
0 46 43
0 36 37
0 56 46
10,1762011 0 1771 85 7 14 8940
10,5502009 0 1062 64 5 3 7343
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 5
10,5762010 0 2281 96 9 11 10352
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknow ledgment Standard for 2010-11.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_E_sc_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 25
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READING
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS (SP) Read (1)
100.0 *
* *
76.9 81.8
87.22011 93.3 93.3 92.9 93.3 1592.9
3
89.42009 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7100.0
84.52010 79.2 78.3 78.3 79.2 24*
88.9 72.7
* *
85.02011 80.0 78.9 78.9 80.0 2078.9
4
72.72009 0
84.42010 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 9*
100.0 * 86.32011 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 11100.0
5
79.72009 0
80.32010 0
96.3 78.9
* *
82.4 87.5
––2011 89.1 88.9 88.6 89.1 4688.6
ALL
––2009 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 7100.0
––2010 84.8 84.4 83.9 84.8 33*
0 27 19
0 3 4
0 17 16
––2011 0 460 45 0 44 4644
––2009 0 70 7 0 7 77
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES ALL
––2010 0 330 32 0 31 335
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 70 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_read_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 26
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READING
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
TAKS (SP) Read (2)
0 *
* *
3 2
7102011 1 1 1 1 151
3
5142009 0 0 0 0 70
8632010 5 5 5 5 24*
1 3
* *
7552011 4 4 4 4 204
4
2682009 0
6512010 0 0 0 0 9*
0 * 3982011 0 0 0 0 110
5
862009 0
1202010 0
1 4
* *
3 2
––2011 5 5 5 5 465
ALL
––2009 0 0 0 0 70
––2010 5 5 5 5 33*
0 27 19
0 3 4
0 17 16
––2011 0 460 45 0 44 4644
––2009 0 70 7 0 7 77
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES ALL
––2010 0 330 32 0 31 335
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_read_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 27
Basic UnderstandingApplying Knowledge of
Literary ElementsUsing Strategies
to AnalyzeApplying Critical-Thinking SkillsYearGrade
OBJECTIVE
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READING
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
TAKS (SP) Read (3)
2011 88.9 90.5 94.4 87.5
2009
2010
92.4 93.9 88.1 87.5
3 73.6 81.5 78.5 71.4
2011 76.3 85.6 80.7 72.0
2009
20104 100.0 100.0 98.4 96.7
2011 83.2 96.6 92.0 90.2
2009
20105
2011 82.1 89.8 87.9 81.4
2009
2010
92.4 93.9 88.1 87.5
ALL 80.8 86.6 83.9 78.3
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_read_3_obj 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 28
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: READING
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS (SP) Read (4)
72.7 *
* *
38.5 45.5
43.52011 73.3 73.3 71.4 73.3 1571.4
3
30.62009 57.1 57.1 57.1 57.1 757.1
39.62010 41.7 39.1 43.5 41.7 24*
33.3 36.4
* *
38.52011 35.0 31.6 31.6 35.0 2031.6
4
21.12009 0
34.42010 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 9*
71.4 * 29.02011 72.7 72.7 72.7 72.7 1172.7
5
15.32009 0
21.22010 0
59.3 52.6
* *
52.9 62.5
––2011 56.5 55.6 54.5 56.5 4654.5
ALL
––2009 57.1 57.1 57.1 57.1 757.1
––2010 57.6 56.3 58.1 57.6 33*
0 27 19
0 3 4
0 17 16
––2011 0 460 45 0 44 4644
––2009 0 70 7 0 7 77
NUMBER TESTED IN ALL GRADES
––2010 0 330 32 0 31 335
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknow ledgment Standard for 2010-11.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_read_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 29
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS (SP) Writing (1)
* 100.0
* *
93.22011 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 13100.0
4
87.12009 0
93.72010 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 8*
0 5 8
0 0 0
0 3 5
5,0542011 0 130 13 0 13 1313
9812009 0 00 0 0 0 00
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 4
4,2162010 0 80 8 0 7 81
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 70 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_write_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 30
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
TAKS (SP) Writing (2)
* 0
* *
3462011 0 0 0 0 130
4
1272009 0
2662010 0 0 0 0 8*
0 5 8
0 0 0
0 3 5
5,0542011 0 130 13 0 13 1313
9812009 0 00 0 0 0 00
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 4
4,2162010 0 80 8 0 7 81
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_write_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 31
Written Composition¹ :Effectiveness / Command
of Conventions
AppropriateOrganization of Ideas
Correct and EffectiveSentence Construction
Standard Usage andAppropriate Word Choice
Proofreading forPunctuation, Capitalization,
and SpellingYearGrade
OBJECTIVE
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
TAKS (SP) Writing (3)
2011 2.9 96.2 97.1 96.2 89.4
2009
4 2010 2.5 96.9 93.8 98.4 92.2
¹Average rating on w ritten composition. TAKS compositions are rated on a scale of 1 to 4.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_write_3_obj 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 32
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Spanish Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills: WRITING
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS (SP) Writing (4)
* 100.0
* *
27.72011 84.6 84.6 84.6 84.6 1384.6
4
20.42009 0
30.42010 37.5 37.5 28.6 37.5 8*
0 5 8
0 0 0
0 3 5
5,0542011 0 130 13 0 13 1313
9812009 0 00 0 0 0 00
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADE 4
4,2162010 0 80 8 0 7 81
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknow ledgment Standard for 2010-11.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TAKS_S_write_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 33
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS-M Read (1) Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): READING
*
*
81.72011 * * * * 3*
3
2009
81.12010 * * * * 4*
4* * 87.7* * * **
* *
* *
76.62011 * * * * 3*
4
2009
75.82010 * * * * 4*
716.7 * 71.814.3 14.3 14.3 14.3*
100.0 *
100.0 *
95.12011 * * 100.0 100.0 * 100.0 8*
5
2009
93.92010 100.0 * 100.0 100.0 * 100.0 9100.0
783.3 * 80.3* * 83.3 85.7 * 85.7*
90.9 *
91.7 *
84.82011 90.9 * 92.3 92.9 * 92.9 14100.0
3-5
2009
84.82010 86.7 * 88.2 88.2 * 88.2 1791.7
1853.3 * 79.250.0 * 52.9 55.6 * 55.662.5
0 11 3
0 12 5
1,4382011 0 311 13 14 2 1410
2009
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
1,7492010 0 215 17 17 2 1712
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 70 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
0 15 3 1,8670 216 17 18 1 188
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_read_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 34
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
Number Tested(All Students)
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): READINGTAKS-M Read (2)
*
*
692011 * * * * 3*
3
2009
962010 * * * * 4*
4* * 60* * * **
* *
* *
1232011 * * * * 3*
4
2009
1262010 * * * * 4*
75 * 1926 6 6 6*
0 *
0 *
262011 * * 0 0 * 0 8*
5
2009
442010 0 * 0 0 * 0 90
71 * 137* * 1 1 * 1*
1 *
1 *
2182011 1 * 1 1 * 1 140
3-5
2009
2662010 2 * 2 2 * 2 171
187 * 3898 * 8 8 * 83
0 11 3
0 12 5
1,4382011 0 311 13 14 2 1410
2009
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
1,7492010 0 215 17 17 2 1712
0 15 3 1,8670 216 17 18 1 188
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_read_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 35
Basic UnderstandingApplying Knowledgeof Literary Elements
Using Strategiesto Analyze
Applying Critical-Thinking Skills
YearGrade
OBJECTIVE
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): READINGTAKS-M Read (3)
2011 * * * *
2009
20103 * * * *
* * * *
2011 * * * *
2009
20104 * * * *
29.8 14.3 31.0 25.0
2011 70.5 89.6 70.8 67.0
2009
20105 77.8 90.7 83.3 79.8
76.6 81.0 85.7 77.9
2011 70.1 83.3 69.0 69.9
2009
20103-5 72.9 83.3 79.2 70.9
52.5 47.2 58.7 54.8
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_read_3_obj_elem 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 36
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS-M Read (4) Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): READING
*
*
20.92011 * * * * 3*
3
2009
19.12010 * * * * 4*
* * 16.2* * * ** 4
* *
* *
13.72011 * * * * 3*
4
2009
15.22010 * * * * 4*
0.0 * 8.90.0 0.0 0.0 0.0* 7
16.7 *
33.3 *
16.52011 * * 14.3 12.5 * 12.5 8*
5
2009
15.42010 28.6 * 22.2 22.2 * 22.2 933.3
33.3 * 14.1* * 16.7 28.6 * 28.6* 7
18.2 *
33.3 *
16.62011 18.2 * 15.4 14.3 * 14.3 1420.0
3-5
2009
16.42010 26.7 * 23.5 23.5 * 23.5 1733.3
13.3 * 12.712.5 * 5.9 11.1 * 11.112.5 18
0 11 3
0 12 5
1,4382011 0 311 13 14 2 1410
2009
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
1,7492010 0 215 17 17 2 1712
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknowledgment Standard for 2010-11.
0 15 3 1,8670 216 17 18 1 188
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_read_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 37
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
PERCENTAGE MEETING STANDARD
TAKS-M Math (1) Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): MATHEMATICS
2009
*
*
82.72011 * * * * 3*
3 78.32010 * * * * 2*
* * 81.2* * * * 4*
2009
* *
* *
80.22011 * * * * 3*
4 80.62010 * * * * 5*
33.3 * 75.816.7 * 28.6 28.6 28.6 7*
2009
* *
100.0 *
88.12011 * * * 100.0 * 100.0 6*
5 86.42010 100.0 * 100.0 100.0 * 100.0 9100.0
75.0 * 80.271.4 * 75.0 77.8 * 77.8 983.3
2009
90.0 *
90.9 *
83.82011 88.9 * 90.9 91.7 * 91.7 12100.0
3-5 82.42010 92.3 * 93.3 93.8 * 93.8 1691.7
47.1 * 78.835.3 * 42.1 45.0 * 45.0 2070.0
0 10 2
0 11 5
1,3792011 0 39 11 12 2 129
2009
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
1,6152010 0 313 15 16 2 1612
Shaded cells indicate percentages below 65 percent, the 2010-11 AEIS minimum for an Academically Acceptable rating.
0 17 3 1,7430 317 19 20 1 2010
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_math_1_per_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 38
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
NUMBER NOT MEETING STANDARD
TAKS-M Math (2) Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): MATHEMATICS
2011
2009
2010
*
*
63* * * * 3*
3 102* * * * 2*
* * 85* * * ** 4
2011
2009
2010
* *
* *
101* * * * 3*
4 92* * * * 5*
4 * 1575 * 5 5 5* 7
2011
2009
2010
* *
0 *
60* * * 0 * 0 6*
5 910 * 0 0 * 0 90
2 * 1272 * 2 2 * 21 9
2011
2009
2010
1 *
1 *
2241 * 1 1 * 1 120
3-5 2851 * 1 1 * 1 161
9 * 36911 * 11 11 * 113 20
0 10 2
0 11 5
1,3792011 0 39 11 12 2 129
2009
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
1,6152010 0 313 15 16 2 1612
0 17 3 1,7430 317 19 20 1 2010
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_math_2_num_not_meet 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 39
Numbers, Operations,and Quantitative
Reasoning
Patterns,Relationships, and
Algebraic Reasoning
Geometry andSpatial Reasoning
Concepts and Usesof Measurement
Probability andStatistics
MathematicalProcesses and Tools
YearGrade
OBJECTIVE
AVERAGE PERCENTAGE OF ITEMS CORRECT BY OBJECTIVE
Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): MATHEMATICSTAKS-M Math (3)
*
* * * * * *
* * * * * *
* * * * *
2011
2009
3 2010
51.4
* * * * * *
* * * * * *
47.6 28.6 45.7 61.9 28.6
2011
2009
4 2010
59.3
61.1 75.0 72.2 69.4 83.3 83.3
80.2 81.5 64.8 79.6 70.4 80.0
56.8 66.7 57.4 70.4 55.6
2011
2009
5 2010
53.7
66.7 65.8 71.1 56.4 61.1 79.2
75.0 82.9 70.2 61.0 72.9 73.1
47.8 49.0 46.8 55.0 42.5
2011
2009
3-5 2010
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_math_3_obj_elem 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 40
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING COMMENDED PERFORMANCE
TAKS-M Math (4) Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (Modified): MATHEMATICS
*
*
20.62011 * * * * 3*
3
2009
13.42010 * * * * 2*
* * 22.3* * * ** 4
* *
* *
25.32011 * * * * 3*
4
2009
20.22010 * * * * 5*
16.7 * 14.016.7 * 14.3 14.3 14.3* 7
* *
0.0 *
20.02011 * * * 16.7 * 16.7 6*
5
2009
18.92010 0.0 * 0.0 0.0 * 0.0 90.0
0.0 * 17.20.0 * 0.0 0.0 * 0.00.0 9
10.0 *
9.1 *
22.12011 0.0 * 9.1 8.3 * 8.3 1211.1
3-5
2009
17.72010 15.4 * 13.3 12.5 * 12.5 1616.7
5.9 * 17.35.9 * 5.3 5.0 * 5.010.0 20
0 10 2
0 11 5
1,3792011 0 39 11 12 2 129
2009
NUMBER TESTED IN GRADES 3-5
1,6152010 0 313 15 16 2 1612
Shaded cells indicate percentages at or above 30 percent, the Gold Performance Acknow ledgment Standard for 2010-11.
0 17 3 1,7430 317 19 20 1 2010
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_M-TAKS_E_math_4_per_comm 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 41
Number Tested(All Students)
Number Tested(All Students)
DistrictAt Risk Not At Risk All DistrictYearGrade At Risk Not At Risk All
State Compensatory Education (SCE) Compliance for At-Risk StudentsCompliance
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE on the ITBS
YearGrade
MATHEMATICS TOTAL (**MATHEMATICS )READING TOTAL (**READING PROFILE TOTAL )
2009
K**
56.8 7363.32011 84.0 83.9 83.9 56 90.2 78.1 84.9
52.8
51.2
73
110
54.4* * 1 50.0 65.9 58.9
61.22010 66.7 91.7 81.0 84 70.5 75.5 72.7
2009
K**
2011
2010
2009
1
53.1 6758.12011 37.5 69.2 57.1 63 63.2 62.1 62.7
50.4
48.8
92
83
54.212.2 54.0 35.2 91 16.7 22.0 19.6
55.22010 64.0 87.5 78.5 65 75.6 83.3 79.5
2009
1
2011
2010
2009
2
56.8 8050.72011 36.8 73.9 50.8 61 20.0 48.0 28.8
53.2
54.6
75
112
47.918.8 66.7 36.0 75 17.0 57.1 32.0
48.62010 39.4 69.2 47.8 92 41.2 81.5 50.9
2009
2
2011
2010
2009
5
44.8 9036.22011 25.9 52.8 43.8 80 23.1 47.1 36.7
0
0
0
2010 0
2009
5
2011
2010
2009
1-5
53.3 31047.22011 33.7 62.6 50.0 204 46.8 57.7 51.6
52.3
51.5
240
305
51.015.7 58.4 35.5 166 25.6 45.4 35.4
51.92010 46.2 80.3 60.5 157 58.3 79.7 66.6
2009
K-5
2011
2010
29,7632011 114 146 260 51,019173 137 310
15,9252009 90 77 167
20,2522010 127 114 241
30,563121 119 240
40,163187 118 305NumberTested
2011
2009
2010NumberTested
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_SCE_COMPLIANCE 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 42
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: READING TOTAL (**READING PROFILE TOTAL)ITBS Read (1)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
74.1 93.1
*
80.9 81.1
63.32011 86.0 66.7 83.0 * 83.9 5684.0
K**
54.42009 * * * 1*
61.22010 80.8 83.3 81.5 * 81.0 8466.7
55.9 58.6
34.0 36.4
77.4 79.4
58.12011 57.6 * 56.5 57.1 6337.5
1
54.22009 * 32.6 * 32.9 * * 35.2 9112.2
55.22010 77.8 * 80.3 * * 78.5 6564.0
43.3 58.1
35.3 36.6
51.0 44.2
50.72011 50.0 48.3 * 50.8 6136.8
2
47.92009 34.7 * 35.6 0.0 * 36.0 7518.8
48.62010 48.3 * 46.7 * * 47.8 9239.4
50.0 58.3
34.6 36.5
61.3 59.7
54.42011 53.8 * 52.5 * 54.0 12437.1
1-2
51.02009 * 33.5 71.4 34.2 11.1 * 35.5 16615.7
51.92010 60.7 57.1 60.3 * * 60.5 15746.2
40.0 47.5 36.22011 42.1 * 45.9 0.0 * 43.8 8025.9
5
2009 0
2010 0
46.2 54.0
34.6 36.5
61.3 59.7
47.22011 49.2 71.4 50.0 0.0 * 50.0 20433.7
1-5
51.02009 * 33.5 71.4 34.2 11.1 * 35.5 16615.7
51.92010 60.7 57.1 60.3 * * 60.5 15746.2
0 104 100
0 81 85
0 80 77
23,0022011 0 7195 194 9 1 20489
14,6372009 1 7158 158 9 3 16689NumberTested
13,9902010 0 7150 151 4 2 15791
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ITBS_read_1_perGE40 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 43
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: READING TOTAL (**READING PROFILE TOTAL)ITBS Read (2)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
17 21
*
29 17
2,1062011 34 4 36 * 38 5616
K**
3042009 * * * 1*
1,7172010 44 2 44 * 46 8410
7 10
5 4
11 22
1,9632011 16 * 17 17 631
1
1,6592009 * 9 * 6 * * 9 910
1,7292010 33 * 31 * * 33 657
1 4
4 1
4 5
1,0202011 5 5 * 5 611
2
1,0272009 5 * 5 0 * 5 750
9542010 9 * 8 * * 9 924
8 14
9 5
15 27
2,9832011 21 * 22 * 22 1242
1-2
2,6882009 * 14 0 11 0 * 14 1660
2,6832010 42 0 39 * * 42 15711
5 7 7012011 11 * 11 0 * 12 800
5
2009 0
2010 0
13 21
9 5
15 27
3,6942011 32 2 33 0 * 34 2042
1-5
2,6882009 * 14 0 11 0 * 14 1660
2,6832010 42 0 39 * * 42 15711
0 104 100
0 81 85
0 80 77
23,0022011 0 7195 194 9 1 20489
14,6372009 1 7158 158 9 3 16689NumberTested
13,9902010 0 7150 151 4 2 15791
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ITBS_read_2_nGE80 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 44
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS TOTAL (**MATHEMATICS)ITBS Math (1)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
77.8 91.9
51.6 64.3
71.7 74.0
56.82011 82.0 91.3 85.5 * 100.0 84.9 7390.2
K**
52.82009 54.2 78.6 57.1 * 72.7 58.9 7350.0
51.22010 71.8 75.0 72.0 * 76.9 72.7 11070.5
59.5 66.7
22.9 15.9
75.0 83.7
53.12011 60.5 66.7 62.7 66.7 62.7 6763.2
1
50.42009 * 18.6 * 16.3 * * 19.6 9216.7
48.82010 75.8 90.5 81.0 * 90.0 79.5 8375.6
34.3 24.4
33.3 31.0
55.7 45.1
56.82011 32.8 11.1 28.6 * 10.5 28.8 8020.0
2
53.22009 32.4 * 32.9 0.0 * 32.0 7517.0
54.62010 59.6 17.4 50.0 * 10.0 50.9 11241.2
57.4 58.0
33.9 36.7
66.5 66.7
55.62011 56.5 60.0 57.7 0.0 57.9 57.7 22053.7
K-2
52.32009 * 32.9 60.9 34.1 20.0 64.3 35.4 24025.6
51.52010 68.1 61.8 66.2 25.0 60.6 66.6 30558.3
34.8 38.6 44.82011 30.7 64.3 36.5 0.0 58.3 36.7 9023.1
5
2009 0
2010 0
50.6 52.6
33.9 36.7
66.5 66.7
53.32011 48.0 60.8 51.7 0.0 58.0 51.6 31046.8
K-5
52.32009 * 32.9 60.9 34.1 20.0 64.3 35.4 24025.6
51.52010 68.1 61.8 66.2 25.0 60.6 66.6 30558.3
0 154 156
0 112 128
0 161 144
51,0192011 0 79229 298 14 69 310173
30,5632009 1 23216 229 10 14 240121NumberTested
40,1632010 0 76229 296 8 66 305187
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ITBS_math_1_perGE40 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 45
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS TOTAL (**MATHEMATICS)ITBS Math (2)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
17 21
4 9
20 17
2,8152011 23 15 37 * 12 38 7322
K**
2,4552009 12 1 12 * 1 13 732
2,3582010 25 12 36 * 10 37 11016
7 12
3 0
11 17
2,7162011 9 10 19 9 19 6710
1
1,5772009 * 3 * 2 * * 3 920
2,2662010 20 8 27 * 8 28 8313
1 2
1 3
10 9
2,7462011 2 0 2 * 0 3 800
2
1,6862009 4 * 4 0 * 4 752
2,4842010 18 1 18 * 0 19 1128
25 35
8 12
41 43
8,2772011 34 25 58 0 21 60 22032
K-2
5,7182009 * 19 1 18 1 1 20 2404
7,1082010 63 21 81 1 18 84 30537
3 2 1,3952011 4 1 5 0 1 5 901
5
2009 0
2010 0
28 37
8 12
41 43
9,6962011 38 26 63 0 22 65 31033
K-5
5,7182009 * 19 1 18 1 1 20 2404
7,1082010 63 21 81 1 18 84 30537
0 154 156
0 112 128
0 161 144
51,0192011 0 79229 298 14 69 310173
30,5632009 1 23216 229 10 14 240121NumberTested
40,1632010 0 76229 296 8 66 305187
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ITBS_math_2_nGE80 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 46
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS COMPUTATIONITBS Math (3)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
52.2 68.4
51.7 31.5
66.7 72.7
66.72011 55.2 69.2 59.0 71.4 59.5 8458.1
1
66.02009 * 33.7 72.0 40.6 * 78.9 42.0 11239.0
63.52010 68.3 75.0 70.9 * 73.7 69.9 8361.0
31.4 26.7
30.4 19.2
49.2 45.1
62.02011 29.5 22.2 28.6 * 26.3 28.8 8023.6
2
60.92009 22.5 29.6 25.0 11.1 29.2 24.5 9821.4
61.42010 51.7 30.4 47.2 * 30.0 47.3 11038.6
43.2 45.8
42.3 25.5
56.1 57.9
64.42011 42.0 50.0 44.4 * 50.0 44.5 16438.8
1-2
63.52009 * 28.7 50.0 33.2 18.2 51.2 33.8 21029.5
62.52010 58.7 51.2 57.2 * 51.3 57.0 19346.0
42.6 55.6 48.62011 43.4 73.3 47.1 14.3 76.9 48.9 9237.5
5
2009 0
2010 0
43.0 49.2
42.3 25.5
56.1 57.9
59.72011 42.6 55.9 45.3 11.1 56.6 46.1 25638.4
1-5
63.52009 * 28.7 50.0 33.2 18.2 51.2 33.8 21029.5
62.52010 58.7 51.2 57.2 * 51.3 57.0 19346.0
0 128 128
0 104 106
0 98 95
38,1762011 0 59195 247 9 53 256138
27,4802009 1 52157 202 11 43 210129NumberTested
26,9372010 0 43150 187 4 39 193124
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ITBS_math_3_perGE40 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 47
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
ITBS: MATHEMATICS COMPUTATIONITBS Math (4)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
14 17
13 8
9 16
4,4272011 16 15 31 12 31 8415
1
4,5972009 * 9 12 18 * 11 21 11213
4,1292010 21 4 24 * 4 25 8310
0 1
3 1
11 6
3,8102011 1 0 0 * 0 1 800
2
3,8222009 2 2 4 0 2 4 982
3,7762010 16 1 16 * 1 17 1108
14 18
16 9
20 22
8,2372011 17 15 31 * 12 32 16415
1-2
8,4192009 * 11 14 22 0 13 25 21015
7,9052010 37 5 40 * 5 42 19318
2 3 1,4162011 3 2 5 0 1 5 921
5
2009 0
2010 0
16 21
16 9
20 22
9,6602011 20 17 36 0 13 37 25616
1-5
8,4192009 * 11 14 22 0 13 25 21015
7,9052010 37 5 40 * 5 42 19318
0 128 128
0 104 106
0 98 95
38,1762011 0 59195 247 9 53 256138
27,4802009 1 52157 202 11 43 210129NumberTested
26,9372010 0 43150 187 4 39 193124
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_ITBS_math_4_nGE80 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 48
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Logramos: READING TOTALLOG Read (1)
PERCENTAGE AT OR ABOVE THE 40th PERCENTILE
100.0 100.0
90.0 92.3
90.92011 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 17100.0
K
88.62009 0
89.32010 91.3 91.3 91.3 91.3 2390.9
75.0 85.7
90.0 90.0
100.0 100.0
89.42011 80.0 80.0 85.7 80.0 1584.6
1
88.62009 90.0 90.0 88.9 90.0 2088.2
89.12010 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 19100.0
100.0 85.7
100.0 90.0
90.9 100.0
94.92011 * 89.5 90.5 90.0 90.5 2189.5
2
94.02009 95.7 95.7 * 95.5 95.7 2395.7
93.82010 94.7 94.7 94.7 94.7 1994.4
91.7 89.7
95.7 90.0
93.3 96.8
91.72011 * 90.2 90.4 92.2 90.6 5391.7
K-2
90.42009 93.0 93.0 * 92.5 93.0 4392.5
90.72010 95.1 95.1 95.1 95.1 6194.8
77.8 * 93.52011 85.7 85.7 * 85.7 85.7 1485.7
5
2009 0
2010 0
87.9 91.2
95.7 90.0
93.3 96.8
91.92011 * 89.2 89.4 * 90.8 89.6 6790.3
K-5
90.42009 93.0 93.0 * 92.5 93.0 4392.5
90.72010 95.1 95.1 95.1 95.1 6194.8
0 33 34
0 23 20
0 30 31
21,1412011 0 652 66 2 65 6762
19,0762009 0 430 43 2 40 4340NumberTested
19,0412010 0 610 61 0 61 6158
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_LOG_read_1_perGE40 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 49
FemaleMigrant MaleAt RiskWhite AfricanAmer
Hispanic EconDisadv
SpecialEduc
LEP All DistrictYearGrade Number Tested(All Students)
Logramos: READING TOTALLOG Read (2)
NUMBER AT OR ABOVE THE 80th PERCENTILE
4 5
8 8
3,9642011 9 8 9 9 179
K
3,5252009 0
3,5232010 16 16 16 16 2315
6 5
9 7
6 8
2,4592011 11 11 11 11 1510
1
2,5232009 16 16 14 16 2013
2,5292010 14 14 14 14 1913
5 6
3 2
3 4
3,2272011 * 11 11 11 11 2110
2
2,9092009 5 5 * 5 5 235
3,0402010 7 7 7 7 196
15 16
12 9
17 20
9,6502011 * 31 30 31 31 5329
K-2
8,9572009 21 21 * 19 21 4318
9,0922010 37 37 37 37 6134
5 * 8562011 10 10 * 10 10 1410
5
2009 0
2010 0
20 21
12 9
17 20
10,5192011 * 41 40 * 41 41 6739
K-5
8,9572009 21 21 * 19 21 4318
9,0922010 37 37 37 37 6134
0 33 34
0 23 20
0 30 31
21,1412011 0 652 66 2 65 6762
19,0762009 0 430 43 2 40 4340NumberTested
19,0412010 0 610 61 0 61 6158
filler
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountability (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Services) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_LOG_read_2_nGE80 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 50
PercentageImprovedin 2011
PercentageImprovedin 2011
PercentageImprovedin 2011
PercentageImprovedin 2011
Level 1 in 2010 Level 2 in 2010 Level 3 in 2010 Levels 1-3 in 2010
NumberTested
Both Years
NumberTested
Both Years
GradeNumberTested
Both Years
NumberTested
Both Years
Woodcock-Muñoz Language Survey
PERCENTAGE DEMONSTRATING IMPROVEMENT
WMLS
14 1 0.0 0.0 3 33.3 5 20.0
1ALL 1 0.0 0.0 3 33.3 5 20.0
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountab ility (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Servi ces) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_W MLS 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 51
N (%) Progressed
Number RatedBoth Years
2010 Level
PERFORMANCE IN 2011 PROGRESSION FROM2010 TO 2011
Listening Speaking Writing
% % % %
Grade
N N N N(N Rated) 2011 Level N %
CompositeReading
2011 Level
Domain:
IntBeg Adv AdvHigh
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment Syste mTELPAS
75.0
KN
3 18.8 12 14 87.5 15
(16)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
93.8 93.815
25.013 81.3 4 2 12.5 1 6.3 6.31
0.00 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00
0.00 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.00
–
–
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
–
––
–
–
–
–
–
–
18.2
1
4 18.2 4 8 36.4 10
(22)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
45.5 45.510
27.36 27.3 6 8 36.4 2 9.1 9.12
31.88 36.4 7 4 18.2 9 40.9 40.99
22.74 18.2 5 2 9.1 1 4.5 4.51
20
12 (60.0%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
8
02
8
1
1
0
0
0
0.0
2
0 0.0 0 9 45.0 5
(20)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
25.0 25.05
10.00 0.0 2 6 30.0 6 30.0 30.06
45.04 20.0 9 5 25.0 7 35.0 35.07
45.016 80.0 9 0 0.0 2 10.0 10.02
18
11 (61.1%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
5
14
5
0
0
2
1
0
0.0
3
0 0.0 0 1 5.9 4
(17)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
23.5 23.54
47.10 0.0 8 10 58.8 4 23.5 23.54
29.410 58.8 5 6 35.3 3 17.6 17.63
23.57 41.2 4 0 0.0 6 35.3 35.36
17
11 (64.7%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
4
22
0
0
3
3
0
3
4.3
4
1 4.3 1 1 4.3 2
(23)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
8.7 8.72
26.13 13.0 6 8 34.8 6 26.1 26.16
52.217 73.9 12 13 56.5 6 26.1 26.16
17.42 8.7 4 1 4.3 9 39.1 39.19
22
14 (63.6%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
2
42
1
0
3
0
2
8
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountab ility (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Servi ces) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TELPAS 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 52
N (%) Progressed
Number RatedBoth Years
2010 Level
PERFORMANCE IN 2011 PROGRESSION FROM2010 TO 2011
Listening Speaking Writing
% % % %
Grade
N N N N(N Rated) 2011 Level N %
CompositeReading
2011 Level
Domain:
IntBeg Adv AdvHigh
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment Syste mTELPAS
0.0
5
0 0.0 0 3 20.0 1
(15)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
6.7 6.71
20.04 26.7 3 3 20.0 2 13.3 13.32
60.06 40.0 9 6 40.0 2 13.3 13.32
20.05 33.3 3 3 20.0 10 66.7 66.710
14
14 (100.0%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
0
02
0
0
2
0
0
10
15.0
ALL
8 7.1 17 36 31.9 37
(113)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
32.7 32.737
25.726 23.0 29 37 32.7 21 18.6 18.621
37.245 39.8 42 34 30.1 27 23.9 23.927
22.134 30.1 25 6 5.3 28 24.8 24.828
91
62 (68.1%)
Beginning
Intermediate
Advanced
Advanced High
19
712
14
1
9
5
3
21
Indicates students w ho progressed at least one level f rom 2010 to 2011.
July 28, 2011 Dallas ISD Evaluation & Accountab ility (Data Analysis, Research, and Reporting Servi ces) V:\CILT\1112\CILT_1012.mdb rpt_TELPAS 2011-12 Campus Data Packet
UMPHREY LEE (175) 53