| Date post: | 19-Jan-2016 |
| Category: |
Documents |
| Upload: | edwin-blankenship |
| View: | 218 times |
| Download: | 0 times |
School-wide PBIS in MinnesotaMetro Regional Implementation Project
Cohort 11 – Winter TrainingNovember 9, 2015
Minnesota Department of Education – PBIS Management Team
Portions adapted from Kevin Filter, PhD, Minnesota State University, Mankato and Terrance Scott, PhD, University of Louisville (KY).
Bridging Research to Practice
Social Media
facebook.com/pbisMN
twitter.com/pbisMN
#pbisMN
pbisMN.orgApplications Due
Building Capacity of Effective Implementation of SW-PBIS
District participation inCohort training
Cohorts 1- 11(2005-2017)
Evaluation Schedule for Schools in TrainingData Calendar At-A-Glance
http://pbisevalmn.org
School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET)Results in Training - Cohorts 5-10
2009-2015
C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10
0102030405060708090
100
BaselineEnd Year 1
End Year 2
BaselineEnd Year 1End Year 2
• The average team attending training finished above 80 on the SET– 117 schools finished at 80 or above
• For schools that didn’t quite get to 80, most were within 10 points and action planning can get over the 80 mark within the next year.
Lessons Learned
education.state.mn.us 7
• A few patterns emerged for schools that scored below 80 on the SET at the end of year 2
– 100% missed one or more SET evaluations
– 60% did not do a SAS
– 44% had an administrator miss one or more training days
Lessons Learned
education.state.mn.us 8
“Sustainability”
Research identifies four factors that predict sustained implementation of PBIS.
• District Priority
• School Priority
• Capacity Building
• Team Use of Data– school team/staff skill,
– regular team meetings,
– data collection,
– use of data for decision making,
– presenting data to staff and community (McIntosh, et al., 2014)
#1 = Team Use of Data• There are “happy accidents” that are a
result of implementing PBIS.• Focus –less time– on building skills if they
are not building team use of data.– Posters will get posted– Popcorn-makers will pop– Videos will keep rollin’
• How’s our team getting data for decisions that support our very specific strategies?
All the “Tools”• They evolve and build off of each other• Beyond cohort training . . .
– expect that there will be small changes and tools that appear when you were not ready to use
• We love to guide the use of the tools.
MRIP Cohort 10 TICMRIP Team Implementation Checklist 2014-2015
Cool Research
Classroom Rewards: Tickets, Tokens, and Tootling
Findings from recent research conducted by
Kevin J. Filter, Ph.D.
Minnesota State University Mankato
Takeaways…
• Giving tokens (reinforcement) is more
effective than taking away tokens
(punishment) in the classroom
• Teachers are generally willing to use rewards
• Students can effectively deliver rewards to
each other (tootling)
Applying to PBIS work
• Cohort training provides the time and tools to engineer recognition systems for teachers to use in the classroom
• Recognition systems reinforce universal strategies, like clearly defined and posted classroom expectations
• “Most teachers are willing to reward positive behaviors” makes our work easier.
– Shifts effort from how to change a belief system to how to support staff to deliver tangible reinforcement (tokens, tickets, tootling, etc.) and provide students with specific praise/ feedback.
Measuring progress over time
• Increase or decrease in number of ODRs• Suspension/Expulsion data
THE CHALLENGE
Educational settings contain variables
that change from year to year.
• Enrollment changes • Grade levels reconfiguration• Schools close• Composition of student body
HOW DO WE LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD?
The Alternative: Rates Per 100
100Total # of Incidents
Total Enrollment# of Incidents per 100 Students
VS.
Statewide Disciplinary Reductions in Rate per 100
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
7.6 7.5
6.46 5.8
MINNESOTA
RA
TE
PE
R 1
00
ST
UD
EN
TS
Source: Disciplinary Incidents reported in theDisciplinary Incident Reporting System (DIRS) data system
Back to #1 Predictor
Team Use of Data• school team/staff skill, • regular team meetings, • data collection• use of data for decision making, • presenting data to staff and
community (McIntosh, et al., 2014)
• Woodson Kindergarten Center – Austin Public Schools (492)
• Washburn Elementary– Bloomington Public Schools (271)
• Indian Mounds Elementary School– Bloomington Public Schools (271)
• Nicollet Junior High School– Burnsville, Eagan, Savage District (191)
• Sioux Trail Elementary– Burnsville, Eagan, Savage District (191)
• King Elementary School– Deer River Public School District (317)
• Lincoln Park Middle School– Duluth Public Schools (709)
• Chanhassen High School– Eastern Carver County Schools (112)
• Chaska Middle School West– Eastern Carver County Schools (112)
• West Education Center– Intermediate District 287 (287)
• Lindbergh Elementary School– Little Falls Community Schools (482)
• Marshall Middle School– Marshall Public Schools (413)
• Morrison County Learning Center– Mid-State Education District (6979)
• Bel Air Elementary School– Mounds View Public Schools (612)
• Edward Neill Elementary School– Mounds View Public Schools (621)
• Sunnyside Elementary– Mounds View Public Schools (621)
• Turtle Lake Elementary School– Mounds View Public Schools (621)
• Valentine Hills Elementary School– Mounds View Public Schools (621)
2014-2015 Minnesota Exemplar Schools
Press Release: 36 Schools Recognized for Excellence in Behavioral Prevention Efforts
• Pine Island Elementary– Pine Island Public Schools (255)
• Pine Island Middle School– Pine Island Public Schools (255)
• North Elementary– Princeton Public Schools (477)
• Princeton Middle School– Princeton Public Schools (477)
• Twin Oaks Middle School – Prior Lake-Savage Area Schools (ISD 719)
• Sonnesyn Elementary School – Robbinsdale Area Schools (281)
• Jackson Elementary– St. Paul Public Schools (625)
• Farnsworth Aerospace Lower PreK-4– St. Paul School Public Schools (625)
• Four Seasons A+ Elem. School– St. Paul School Public Schools (625)
• Galtier Community School– St. Paul School Public Schools (625)
• Oak Hill Community School– St. Cloud Area School District (742)
• Apollo High School– St. Cloud Area Schools (742)
• Talahi Community– St. Cloud Area Schools (742)
• Westwood Elementary School– St. Cloud Area Schools (742)
• Phalen Lake Hmong Studies Magnet– St. Paul Public Schools (625)
• Saint Paul Music Academy– St. Paul Public Schools (625)
• Waterville-Elysian-Morristown J.H. – Waterville-Elysian-Morristown (2143)
• Matoska International Elementary– White Bear Lake Area Schools (624)
2014-2015 Minnesota Exemplar Schools
Press Release: 36 Schools Recognized for Excellence in Behavioral Prevention Efforts
Sustaining Exemplar Recognition
Identify & recognize exemplar schools that have completed PBIS
implementation and are continuing to achieving positive
student outcomes by sustaining school-wide PBIS with
fidelity.
Coming in 2016 there will be recognition categories for districts.
Please stay tuned for specific eligibility requirements coming in
the winter of 2016.
Updated Information Posted on Our Webpage:
http://www.pbismn.org/sw_sustaining.html
2016 Minnesota PBIS Institute &Film Festival
• June 21 & 22, 2016 at MDE - Roseville, MN• Request for Proposals out Nov. 2015• Presentations from previous institutes at
www.pbismn.org/pbisinstitute.html
pbisMN.org
Applications Due January 13, 2016
Applications Due
Metro Regional ContactsMetro Regional Implementation ProjectsIngrid AasanRegional Implementation Project Coordinator [email protected]
Deborah SaxhaugRegional Implementation Project [email protected]
Emily RobbCoach [email protected]
Megan GruisData & Evaluation [email protected]
Find other MN PBIS contacts on our website: www.pbismn.org/contactus.html
PBIS Management - Regional ContactsEric [email protected] 651-582-8268
Maci [email protected]
Garrett [email protected]
PBIS Evaluation ContactWilder [email protected]
• Share your matrices,
and look at others’
bit.ly/MNPBIS_matrices
Upload Your Matrix
education.state.mn.us 26
