Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | pamela-green |
View: | 29 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Science that should help find solutions:
Hydrology and water resources
Matthew McCartney
SRP-Basins
Entry points
• Understand and consider resource variability in basin management• Invest in water infrastructure• Allocate and manage basin water and land to raise productivity,
improve equity and safeguard ecosystem services• Introduce and consistently follow the principles of benefit sharing• Pay attention to the political economy of policy selection
1. Understand and consider resource variability in basin management
Needs:
DataBasic understanding of hydrological processes
020406080
100120140
1 10 100
Peak
floo
d flo
w (m
3 s-1
)
Return period (yrs)
Flood Frequency
Extrapolated
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.1
0.5
0.9 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96
99.1
99.5
99.9
Q/Q
me
an
% time flow exceeded
Flow Duration curves
Characterize variability
Seasonal variationFlow duration curves Flood frequency analyses Low flow analysesAssurance levels
volumes of water that can be guaranteed with different degrees of certainty
Rainfall, River flows and Groundwater
Trend analyses
India – significant rainfall trends (1951-2007)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Accr
a Ai
rpor
t
Ada
Foah
Akus
e
Axim H
o
Kete
Kra
chi
Kum
asi
Nav
rong
o
Saltp
ond
Tam
ale
Wa
Wen
chi
Yend
i
Ejur
a
Kpev
e
Zuar
ungu
Regi
onia
l tre
nd
Sign
ifica
nce
leve
l of p
ositi
ve o
r ne
gativ
e tr
end
(%)
Ghana - For variables exhibiting regionally significant trends the number of individual stations with significant trends is less than 50% of total stations
Not just total rainfall/flow but other significant variables (e.g. no. of rainy days; onset of rainy season)
Regional significance not just individual stations
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
1000.00
1200.0019
20
1925
1930
1935
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
Ne
t w
ate
r d
em
an
d (
Mm
3 )
Irrigation Rural Urban
Mining Forestry Historic (5 year running mean)
Low Demand Scenario Medium Demand Scenario High Demand Scenario
Bas
elin
e
.
Future
Historic
• Changes in demand vary between years (particularly irrigation) and experience trends
• Future development is inherently uncertain so must think about scenarios
Changes in demand
Olifants: Simulated changes in demand
0
200
400
600
800
2 5 10 25 50 100 200
Co
st (
US
$)
Return Period (yrs)
Irrigation
Baseline Low DemandMedium Demand HighDemand
Evaluate the financial “cost” of failing to deliver water in different sectors
Olifants – cost of failing to deliver water for different return periods and different development scenarios
Link to economics
2. Invest in water infrastructure
Must be able to evaluate range of storage options combined within a basin
Storage need
Need and effectiveness
RRV criteria
Reliability: the probability of the storage to meet demand
Resilience: the speed of recovery of storage from failure
Vulnerability a measure of the cumulative maximum extent of failure
Storage Effectiveness
Role of natural infrastructure
Monthly flow upstream and downstream of the Luswishi floodplain
0
20
40
60
80
100
1-O
ct-8
0
1-No
v-80
1-De
c-80
1-Ja
n-81
1-Fe
b-81
1-M
ar-8
1
1-Ap
r-81
1-M
ay-8
1
1-Ju
n-81
1-Ju
l-81
1-Au
g-81
1-Se
p-81
Flow
(m3 s
-1)
Daily flow with and without floodplain
Without floodplain (simulated) With floodplain (observed)
Some ecosystems act like natural reservoirs and regulate flows: • decrease wet season flows • increase dry season flows
Method whereby natural flow regulating impacts can be quantified and incorporated in decision-making
Means that basins with both built and natural infrastructure can be considered in decision-making
3. Allocate and manage basin water and land to raise productivity, improve equity and
safeguard ecosystem services
The ChallengeTo devise strategies that support human development (improve livelihoods) and simultaneously safeguard ecosystem services
How to achieve wise use of basins in any specific social, economic and ecological setting?
Ecosystem Services
Getting it wrong
• Inappropriate agricultural practices…. not only destroy other ecosystem services (regulating, supporting and cultural) but also undermine agriculture
Degraded landscapes in Ethiopia(photos by Adrian Wood)
Provisioning services
Regulatory services
Cultural services
Supporting services
Natural basin
CropsHydropower
IndustrialRegulation of water balance
Erosion control
Climate regulationSoil
formation
Nutrient cycling
Recreation
CropsHydropower
IndustrialRegulation of water balance
Erosion control
Climate regulationSoil
formation
Nutrient cycling
Recreation
Intensively utilized basin
CropsHydropower
Industrial Regulation of water balance
Erosion control
Climate regulationSoil
formation
Nutrient cycling
Recreation
Multifunctional “green” basin
Striking a balance
Linking ecosystem services and water productivity
Quantifiable Non-quantifiableBenefits
Wat
er u
se
Dep
letin
g use
sN
on-d
eple
ting u
ses
Developing a framework to effectively compare parallel benefits is extremely difficult.
One possible approach is expanding the water productivity concept
Environmental flows
0
100
200
300
400
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Ju
n
Jul
Aug
Sep Oct
Nov
Dec
Flo
w (
m3 s-1
)
Flow (1959-1995) Environmental Flow Requirement Flow (2001-2006)
Many methods for estimating EFs – ranging from simple low confidence desktop approaches to complex resource intensive multi-disciplinary studies
Need methods that are applicable to developing countries but for which we can be confident about the results and link to livelihoods
Tis Issat Falls, Blue Nile
4. Introduce and consistently follow the principles of benefit sharing
Schematics of WEAP modelling for Lake Tana sub-basin
Regulated flowsUnregulated flows
Lake Tana
Abbay (Blue Nile)
Tis Issat Falls
Tis Abbay HP plants
116Koga
Gilgel Abbay
270Andassa
1925Megech176
Ribb216
246
Gumara
Intermediate flow
2442180
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35
La
ke
leve
l (m
as
l)
YearNatural FDS with MMF FDS with VEF
Evaluating upstream-downstream interactions
Lake TanaImpact of dam/irrigation development on lake levels and
Implications for:• Environment• Non-ag sectors (e.g.
hydropower) • Livelihoods
Cumulative impacts
Rive
rine c
harac
terist
ic
Headwaters Lower Reaches
Rive
rine c
hara
cteris
tic
Headwaters Lower Reaches
DD
DD
Need to think about cumulative impacts in space and time
Need methods where these can be quickly determined
5. Pay attention to the political economy of policy selection
Hydrological/Resource methods - identify the costs, benefits and risks (for whom and when) associated with particular courses of action.
To be useful findings must be fed into decision-making processes.
Must think about how results are presented and to whom and when.
Thank you
Finding solutions: think out of the box
Current situation –wet season
Current situation
With managed aquifer recharge
Chao Phraya Basin Desk Study
• MAF = 12,248 Mm3y-1
• 3,300 Mm3y-1 discharge to sea harvestable
• Cost <$1 billion
• Additional 270,000 ha of irrigation
• $150 My-1 income to smallholder farmers
• No precidents. Technical studies; studies of institutional arrangements
Harvest the floods: the subsurface solution
Aim: maximizing productivity/benefits
Natural Basin Increasingly modified Basin
Benefits from natural components
Benefits from modified basin components
Sum of benefits
Total productivity (i.e. overall benefits) All change needs to be
considered in relation ecosystem services and trade-offs