+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Scientific Investigations Map 3139 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF … · TAYLOR H E N D R Y G L A D E S ......

Scientific Investigations Map 3139 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF … · TAYLOR H E N D R Y G L A D E S ......

Date post: 21-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: vuxuyen
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Ona Tampa Ocala Venus DeLand Venice Bartow Ruskin Brandon Parrish Palatka Tavares Orlando Seville Placida Dunedin Bronson Gardner Arcadia Sebring Sarasota Lorraine Bushnell Oklawaha Leesburg Lakeland Mulberry Pineland Suwannee Palmdale La Belle Basinger Wauchula Englewood Bradenton Chiefland Inverness Homosassa Kissimmee Polk City Davenport Dade City Avon Park Fort Myers Clearwater Cross City Fort McCoy Rock Ridge Plant City Fort Ogden Frostproof Lake Wales Fort Meade Cape Coral Punta Gorda Myakka Head Myakka City Saint Cloud Lake Alfred Citrus Park Zephyrhills San Antonio Brooksville Port Richey Gainesville Lake Placid Winter Haven Daytona Beach Fort Lonesome Crystal River Tarpon Springs Port Charlotte St. Petersburg Altamonte Springs STARKEY DUNEDIN CROSS BAR RANCH BELLEAIR CYPRESS CREEK MORRIS BRIDGE SOUTH CENTRAL NW HILLSBOROUGH DISPERSED EAST LAKE VERNA ELDRIDGE WILDE NORTH PASCO ODESSA COSME SOUTH PASCO LAKELAND SECTION 21 PINE ISLAND SOUND C H AR L O TT E H A R B O R C A LOO S AHAT C H E E R I V E R LAKE OKEECHOBEE S h e l l Cr e e k Prairie Creek Horse Creek Peace River Big Slough Canal Deer Prairie Creek Myakka River LAKE ISTOKPOGA Lake Jackson Lake Placid Lake June in Winter Br a den River M a n at ee River Litt l e M a n a te e Riv er S. Prong Reedy Lake Lake Livingston Lake Clinch Crooked Lake Buffum Lake P e a ce R i v e r Lake Arbuckle Lake Wechyokapka Lake Rosalie Tiger Lake LAKE KISSIMMEE Lake Marian TAMPA BAY HILLSBOROUGH BAY OLD TAMPA BAY Alafia River N. Prong Lake Hancock Lake Garfield Lake Pierce Lake Jackson Cypress Lake Lake Gentry Alligator Lake Lake Preston East Lake Tohopekaliga Lake Hart Lake Tohopekaliga Lake Conway Lake Hamilton Lake Marion Lake Juliana Lake Mattie Lake Parker Lake Thonoiosassa Blackwater Creek River H i l l s bo ro ug h W ith l a c o o c h e e R iv e r Lake Tarpon A n c l o t e River Pithlachascoiee River Crews Lake Lake Monroe Lake Jessup Lake Harney LAKE APOPKA LAKE HARRIS Lake Dora Lake Griffin Lake Eustis Lake Dorr Lake Norris Lake Weir Lake Panasoffkee Wekiva River Lake Louisa Lake Minnehaha TSALA APOPKA LAKE Crystal River Springs Group LAKE GEORGE Lake Woodruff Lake Disston Lake Kerr ST. JOHNS RIVER Oklawaha River Orange Lake Lake Stafford CRESCENT LAKE Lochloosa Lake Newmans Lake ST. JOHNS RIVER Wekiva River River Waccasassa G U L F O F M E XI C O ATLANTIC OCEAN Lithia Springs Sulphur Springs Rainbow Springs Homosassa Springs WeekiWachee Springs Warm Mineral Springs Chassahowitzka Springs Crystal Springs LEE POLK LAKE DIXIE TAYLOR HENDRY GLADES ORANGE CITRUS MARION PUTNAM DE SOTO OSCEOLA VOLUSIA FLAGLER ALACHUA SARASOTA SEMINOLE ST JOHNS CHARLOTTE HIGHLANDS GILCHRIST OKEECHOBEE PASCO HARDEE SUMTER MANATEE PINELLAS HERNANDO HILLSBOROUGH LEVY 4 5 4 3 1 4 3 4 7 4 7 7 9 6 5 6 1 4 3 2 2 1 2 2 8 6 8 8 1 2 3 4 0 6 2 9 3 3 5 3 5 2 6 7 8 7 8 8 8 5 4 9 8 8 8 5 6 5 5 9 2 1 8 7 6 9 9 3 3 4 9 1 9 47 21 24 44 18 19 10 54 20 53 52 52 45 54 45 52 52 50 25 48 44 43 16 46 16 46 44 11 11 43 49 43 43 45 39 24 17 37 43 46 34 45 35 54 35 38 18 42 47 27 46 31 71 53 17 36 46 42 49 55 48 16 55 13 45 43 44 14 47 50 19 38 52 48 42 12 27 33 37 49 53 48 53 57 38 51 49 42 38 28 20 65 43 21 39 12 49 18 51 13 55 50 40 34 67 40 33 42 67 40 71 54 17 16 40 21 61 21 55 38 59 79 83 78 60 82 45 50 80 81 39 44 22 82 63 34 22 82 88 24 26 23 81 60 78 18 11 19 93 54 11 63 71 15 18 49 15 59 10 96 14 37 99 98 13 67 34 68 52 10 10 26 16 25 75 39 88 41 74 48 48 61 35 50 83 52 39 74 65 86 73 68 51 94 91 81 47 54 98 66 35 85 57 64 35 35 36 66 68 73 46 90 43 77 41 37 56 47 46 61 40 49 60 42 52 50 71 68 43 57 59 48 80 44 81 46 63 43 44 70 46 48 42 47 46 48 48 47 50 47 64 42 18 48 14 51 45 43 77 72 16 75 61 30 19 47 11 10 32 14 14 36 12 16 14 25 39 24 61 42 25 58 57 59 67 25 53 75 69 68 70 87 55 31 67 54 73 66 55 68 90 37 65 44 44 29 61 35 81 72 78 39 66 57 72 59 51 61 96 48 85 20 29 18 44 45 47 19 14 40 93 27 55 71 53 44 88 44 32 32 28 20 27 28 19 96 98 23 47 96 38 17 27 39 96 89 93 15 12 25 48 16 94 11 86 67 80 67 11 78 79 78 -5 27 12 10 65 66 -1 33 13 11 82 28 -3 16 61 48 20 74 50 12 59 -7 78 -7 14 -5 42 36 15 13 14 46 17 58 10 39 14 16 20 43 46 39 40 67 46 47 49 21 36 46 27 35 34 24 29 31 23 27 48 29 19 32 42 38 40 22 48 22 46 27 48 28 23 40 53 44 100 115 103 110 116 109 104 124 127 126 103 126 128 127 118 120 111 114 102 8 6 7 27 35 17 48 31 17 18 29 30 40 50 10 60 70 80 90 0 100 110 120 30 50 60 70 80 90 50 60 70 20 60 50 50 50 70 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 40 70 80 10 50 40 80 50 40 10 20 10 10 70 40 10 30 50 81° 81° 82° 82° 83° 83° 84° 84° 29° 29° 28° 28° 27° 27° SCALE 1:500,000 MILES KILOMETERS 5 0 5 10 15 20 5 0 5 10 15 20 AT L A N T I C OC E A N G UL F O F M E XI C O STUDY AREA MAP AREA ALABAMA GEORGIA FLORIDA U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Scientific Investigations Map 3139 Ortiz, A.G., 2010, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May 2010 POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER, WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA, MAY 2010 By A.G. Ortiz Base from Southwest Florida Water Management District digital data, 1992, State Plane Florida East projection, NAD83 Copies of this map can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, Colorodo 80225-0286 Figure 1. Change in potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer from May 2009 to May 2010 in west-central Florida. Positive values indicate an increase in water-level altitudes. Negative values indicate a decrease in water-level altitudes. HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA The Floridan aquifer system consists of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers separated by the middle confining unit. The middle confining unit and the Lower Floridan aquifer in west-central Florida generally contain highly mineralized water. The water-bearing units containing fresh water are herein referred to as the Upper Floridan aquifer. The Upper Floridan aquifer is the principal source of water in the Southwest Florida Water Management District and is used for major public supply, domestic use, irrigation, and brackish water desalination in coastal communities (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000). This map report shows the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer measured in May 2010. The potentiometric surface is an imaginary surface connecting points of equal altitude to which water will rise in tightly-cased wells that tap a confined aquifer system (Lohman, 1979). This map represents water-level conditions near the end of the dry season, when groundwater levels usually are at an annual low and withdrawals for agricultural use typically are high. The cumulative average rainfall of 55.21 inches for west-central Florida (from June 2009 through May 2010) was 2.55 inches above the historical cumulative average of 52.66 inches (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2010). Historical cumulative averages are calculated from regional rainfall summary reports (1915 to most recent complete calendar year) and are updated monthly by the Southwest Florida Water Management District. This report, prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Southwest Florida Water Management District, is part of a semi-annual series of Upper Floridan aquifer potentiometric-surface map reports for west-central Florida. Potentiometric- surface maps have been prepared for January 1964, May 1969, May 1971, May 1973, May 1974, and for each May and September since 1975. Water-level data are collected in May and September each year to show the approximate annual low and high water-level conditions, respectively. Most of the water-level data for this map were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey during the period May 17-21, 2010. Supplemental water-level data were collected by other agencies and companies. Most water-level measurements were made during a 5-day period; therefore, measurements do not represent a "snapshot" of conditions at a specific time, nor do they necessarily coincide with the seasonal low water-level condition. WATER-LEVEL CHANGES Water levels in about 96 percent of the wells measured in May 2010 were higher than the May 2009 water levels (Ortiz, 2009). Data from 412 wells indicate the May 2010 water levels ranged from about 4 feet below to about 22 feet above the May 2009 water levels (fig. 1). The largest water level increases occurred in southwest Polk County and over a large extent of Hardee County. The largest water level decline occurred in northwest Highlands County (fig. 1). Water levels in about 79 percent of the wells measured in May 2010 were lower than the September 2009 water levels (Ortiz, 2010). Data from 404 wells indicate the May 2010 water levels ranged from about 25 feet below to 5 feet above the September 2009 water levels. The largest water level decline was in north-central Manatee County and the largest rise in water levels was in northwest Pasco County. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author thanks Tampa Bay Water and CF Industries for their assistance with the collection of data used to prepare this report. SELECTED REFERENCES Lohman, S. W., 1979, Ground-water hydraulics: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 708, 72 p. Ortiz, A. G., 2009, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3093, 1 sheet. Ortiz, A. G., 2010, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, September 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3117, 1 sheet. Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000, Aquifer characteristics within the Southwest Florida Water Management District: Broooksville, FL, 123 p. Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2010, Hydrologic conditions for the month of May 2010: Broooksville, FL, 84 p. EXPLANATION MUNICIPAL WELL FIELD POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR -- Shows altitude at which water would have stood in tightly cased wells. Contour interval is 10 feet. National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929. Hachures indicate depressions. Dashed where approximately located. BOUNDARY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929. SPRING CITY OR TOWN OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929. Bold number indicates water levels corrected for salinity. VERNA 20 16 21 4.99 to -0 >0 to 4.99 5.00 to 9.99 10.00 to 14.99 15.00 to 19.99 >=20.00 EXPLANATION Change in the potentiometric surface, in feet (Positive values indicate an increase in water-level altitudes)
Transcript

Ona

Tampa

Ocala

Venus

DeLand

Venice

Bartow

Ruskin

Brandon

Parrish

Palatka

Tavares

Orlando

Seville

Placida

Dunedin

Bronson

Gardner

Arcadia

Sebring

Sarasota

Lorraine

Bushnell

Oklawaha

Leesburg

Lakeland

Mulberry

Pineland

Suwannee

Palmdale

La Belle

Basinger

Wauchula

Englewood

Bradenton

Chiefland

Inverness

Homosassa

Kissimmee

Polk City

Davenport

Dade City

Avon Park

Fort Myers

Clearwater

Cross City

Fort McCoy

Rock Ridge

Plant City

Fort Ogden

Frostproof

Lake Wales

Fort Meade

Cape Coral

Punta Gorda

Myakka Head

Myakka City

Saint Cloud

Lake AlfredCitrus Park

Zephyrhills

San Antonio

Brooksville

Port Richey

Gainesville

Lake Placid

Winter Haven

Daytona Beach

Fort Lonesome

Crystal River

Tarpon Springs

Port Charlotte

St. Petersburg

Altamonte Springs

STARKEY

DUNEDIN

CROSS BARRANCH

BELLEAIR

CYPRESS CREEK

MORRISBRIDGE

SOUTH CENTRAL

NW HILLSBOROUGH DISPERSED

EASTLAKE

VERNA

ELDRIDGEWILDE

NORTHPASCO

ODESSACOSME

SOUTH PASCO

LAKELAND

SECTION 21

PIN

E ISLA

ND

SO

UN

D

CHAR LO TTE

H

AR

BO

R

CALOOSAHATCHEERIVER

LAKEOKEECHOBEE

Shell

Creek

Prairie

Creek

Hors

e Cr

eek

Peac

e Ri

ver

Big

Slou

gh C

anal

Dee

r P

rair

ie

Creek

Myakka River

LAKEISTOKPOGA

Lake

Jackson

Lake

Placid

Lake June

in Winter

Braden River

Manatee

River

Little M

anatee River

S. Prong

Reedy

Lake

Lake

Livingston

Lake

Clinch

Crooked

LakeBuffum

Lake

Peace

Rive

r

Lake

Arbuckle

Lake

Wechyokapka

Lake

Rosalie

Tiger

Lake

LAKE KISSIMM

EE

Lake Marian

TAMPA

BAY

HILLSB

ORO

UG

H

BAY

OLD TAMPA

BAY

Alafia

RiverN. P

rong

Lake

Hancock

Lake

Garfield

Lake

Pierce

Lake

Jackson

Cypress

Lake

Lake

Gentry

Alligator

Lake

Lake

PrestonEast Lake

Tohopekaliga

Lake

Hart

Lake Tohopekaliga

Lake

Conway

Lake

Hamilton

Lake

Marion

Lake

Juliana

Lake

Mattie

Lake

ParkerLake

Thonoiosassa

Blackwater

Creek

Rive

r

Hillsborough

Withlacoo

c hee

River

Lake

Tarpon

An c l ote

River

Pithlachascoiee

River

Crews

Lake

Lake

Monroe

Lake

Jessup

Lake

Harney

LAKEAPOPKA

LAKEHARRIS

LakeDora

Lake

Griffin

LakeEustis

Lake

Dorr

Lake

Norris

LakeWeir

Lake

Panasoffkee

Wek

iva

River

Lake

Louisa

Lake

Minnehaha

TSALA

APOPKA

LAKE

Crystal River

Springs Group

LAKEGEORGE

Lake

Woodruff

Lake

Disston

Lake

Kerr

ST. JOHNS RIVER

Oklaw

aha

River

Orange

Lake

Lake

Stafford

CRESCENTLAKE

Lochloosa

Lake

Newmans

Lake

ST.

JOHNS RIVER

Wekiva

River

Riv

er

Wac

cas

assa

GU

LF

OF

M

EX

IC

O

ATLAN

TIC O

CEA

N

Lithia

Springs

Sulphur

Springs

Rainbow

Springs

Homosassa

Springs

WeekiWachee

Springs

WarmMineralSprings

Chassahowitzka

Springs

Crystal

Springs

L E E

P O L K

L A K E

D I X I E

TAYLOR

H E N D R Y

G L A D E S

O R A N G E

C I T R U S

M A R I O N

P U T N A M

D E S O T O

O S C E O L A

V O L U S I A

F L A G L E R

A L A C H U A

S A R A S O T A

S E M I N O L E

S T J O H N S

C H A R L O T T E

H I G H L A N D S

G I L C H R I S T

O K E E C H O B E E

P A S C O

H A R D E E

S U M T E R

M A N A T E E

P I N E L L A S

H E R N A N D O

H I L L S B O R O U G H

L E V Y

4

5

4

3

1

43

4

7

4

7

7

9

6

5

6

1

43

221

2

2

86

8

8

1

23

4

0

6

2

9

33 5

3

5

2

6 7

87

8

8

8

549

88

856 5

59

218

769

93

3

4

9

1

9

47

21

24

44

18

19

10

54

205352

5245

5445

52 52

50254844

4316

46 1646

44

1111

43

4943

434539

24

17374346 34

453554

35

38 1842472746

3171 53 173646

42 4955 48

165513

45

434414 47

5019

3852

484212

2733

374953

48

5357

38

514942

38

2820

6543 21

39

12 4918 51 13

555040346740

33

426740

71

541716

402161 2155

3859 7983

7860 82 4550

80 81

394422

82

63

34

22 82

88242623 81

60 78181119 93

541163 7115

1849

15

5910

961437

9998

136734

685210

102616

25

7539 88

4174 4848

61 35

508352

397465

8673 68

51 949181 47

54 98

66 35855764

3535 36

6668

73 4690

437741 37

56

474661

40

49

60 42

52 50

71

68

43

5759 48

80

44

81 4663

43

44

70

4648

42

47

4648

48

47

50

47

64

4218 48

14

5145

43

77

72

16

75

61

30

19

47

11

10

3214

14

3612 1614 2539

2461

4225

585759

672553

75696870

875531 67

5473 66

55

68 9037

65444429 61

35 8172 78

396657 72

5951 6196

48 8520

2918

4445

47

1914 4093

27 5571

53448844

3232

28

20

2728

19 969823

47 96

3817 2739

96

89

9315

1225 48

16 94

11 8667

806711

78 7978-5

2712

10

65 66

-133

1311

8228

-3166148

20 74

501259-7

78

-7 14

-54236

15

1314 46

17

58

103914

16 2043 46

39

40 67

46

47

4921

36 4627

353424

29 312327

48

2919

32 42

38

402248

2246

27

48

2823

40

53

44

100

115

103110 116

109

104

124127

126

103126

128127

118

120111

114

102

8

6

7

27

35

17

48

31

17

18 29

30

40

50

10

60

70

80

90

0

100

110

120

30

50

60

70

80

90

50

60

70

20

60

50

50

50

70

1020

30

4050

60

70

40

70

80

10

50

40

80

50

40

10

20

10

10

70

40

10

30

50

81°

81°

82°

82°

83°

83°

84°

84°

29°

29°

28°

28°

27°

27°

SCALE 1:500,000MILES

KILOMETERS

5 0 5 10 15 20

5 0 5 10 15 20

AT

LA

NT

IC O

CEA

N

G U L F OF M

EX

I CO

STUDY AREA

MAP AREA

ALABAMA GEORGIA

FLORIDA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORU.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Prepared in cooperation with theSOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

Scientific Investigations Map 3139Ortiz, A.G., 2010, Potentiometric surface of the Upper

Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May 2010

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE UPPER FLORIDAN AQUIFER,WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA, MAY 2010

By A.G. Ortiz

Base from Southwest Florida Water Management District digital data, 1992,State Plane Florida East projection, NAD83

Copies of this map can be purchased from:U.S. Geological Survey

Branch of Information ServicesBox 25286Denver, Colorodo 80225-0286

Figure 1. Change in potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer from May 2009 to May 2010 in west-central Florida. Positive values indicate an increase in water-level altitudes.Negative values indicate a decrease in water-level altitudes.

HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA

The Floridan aquifer system consists of the Upper and Lower Floridan aquifers separated by the middle confining unit. The middle confining unit and the Lower Floridan aquifer in west-central Florida generally contain highly mineralized water. The water-bearing units containing fresh water are herein referred to as the Upper Floridan aquifer. The Upper Floridan aquifer is the principal source of water in the Southwest Florida Water Management District and is used for major public supply, domestic use, irrigation, and brackish water desalination in coastal communities (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000). This map report shows the potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer measured in May 2010. The potentiometric surface is an imaginary surface connecting points of equal altitude to which water will rise in tightly-cased wells that tap a confined aquifer system (Lohman, 1979). This map represents water-level conditions near the end of the dry season, when groundwater levels usually are at an annual low and withdrawals for agricultural use typically are high. The cumulative average rainfall of 55.21 inches for west-central Florida (from June 2009 through May 2010) was 2.55 inches above the historical cumulative average of 52.66 inches (Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2010). Historical cumulative averages are calculated from regional rainfall summary reports (1915 to most recent complete calendar year) and are updated monthly by the Southwest Florida Water Management District. This report, prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Southwest Florida Water Management District, is part of a semi-annual series of Upper Floridan aquifer potentiometric-surface map reports for west-central Florida. Potentiometric-surface maps have been prepared for January 1964, May 1969, May 1971, May 1973, May 1974, and for each May and September since 1975. Water-level data are collected in May and September each year to show the approximate annual low and high water-level conditions, respectively.

Most of the water-level data for this map were collected by the U.S. Geological Survey during the period May 17-21, 2010. Supplemental water-level data were collected by other agencies and companies. Most water-level measurements were made during a 5-day period; therefore, measurements do not represent a "snapshot" of conditions at a specific time, nor do they necessarily coincide with the seasonal low water-level condition.

WATER-LEVEL CHANGES

Water levels in about 96 percent of the wells measured in May 2010 were higher than the May 2009 water levels (Ortiz, 2009). Data from 412 wells indicate the May 2010 water levelsranged from about 4 feet below to about 22 feet above the May 2009 water levels (fig. 1). The largest water level increases occurred in southwest Polk County and over a large extent of Hardee County. The largest water level decline occurred in northwest Highlands County (fig. 1).

Water levels in about 79 percent of the wells measured in May 2010 were lower than the September 2009 water levels (Ortiz, 2010). Data from 404 wells indicate the May 2010 water levels ranged from about 25 feet below to 5 feet above the September 2009 water levels. The largest water level decline was in north-central Manatee County and the largest rise in water levels was in northwest Pasco County.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author thanks Tampa Bay Water and CF Industries for their assistance with the collection of data used to prepare this report. SELECTED REFERENCES

Lohman, S. W., 1979, Ground-water hydraulics: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 708, 72 p.

Ortiz, A. G., 2009, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, May 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3093, 1 sheet.

Ortiz, A. G., 2010, Potentiometric surface of the Upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, September 2009: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3117, 1 sheet.

Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2000, Aquifer characteristics within the Southwest Florida Water Management District: Broooksville, FL, 123 p.

Southwest Florida Water Management District, 2010, Hydrologic conditions for the month of May 2010: Broooksville, FL, 84 p.

EXPLANATION

MUNICIPAL WELL FIELD

POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR -- Shows altitude at which water would have stood in tightly cased wells. Contour interval is 10 feet. National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929. Hachures indicate depressions. Dashed where approximately located.

BOUNDARY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929.

SPRING

CITY OR TOWN

OBSERVATION WELL -- Number is altitude of water level in feet above or below NGVD of 1929. Bold number indicates water levels corrected for salinity.

VERNA

20

16

21

4.99 to -0

>0 to 4.99

5.00 to 9.99

10.00 to 14.99

15.00 to 19.99

>=20.00

EXPLANATION

Change in the potentiometric surface, in feet

(Positive values indicate an increase in water-level altitudes)

Recommended