+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Scientists Artists Psychologists

Scientists Artists Psychologists

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: vukashinme
View: 221 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 59

Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    1/59

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    2/59

    Creative Scientists, Artists,

    and Psychologists:

    Modeling Disposition, Development,

    and Achievement

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    3/59

    Three Arguments

    First, creativity is a

    heterogeneous rather than homogeneous

    phenomenon (i.e., some domain-specificity);

    but a substantial proportion of this heterogeneitycan be captured by a single latent factor that

    extends from the sciences to the arts;

    that is, along this implicit dimension we can place

    the principal domains of creative activity, includingpsychology

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    4/59

    Three Arguments

    Second, this single dimension is correlated

    with psychological traits and experiences of

    creators who practice in a given domain; that

    is, these variables are dispositional (e.g., personality), and

    developmental (e.g., education)

    i.e., the dimension is psychological as well aslogical, ontological, or epistemological

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    5/59

    Three Arguments

    Third, an individuals magnitude of creativity

    in a chosen domain corresponds at least in

    part with the fit between his/her

    dispositional traits and

    developmental experiences

    and those that are typical of that domain or

    some other domain along the samedimension

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    6/59

    First Argument:

    Hierarchy of the Sciences

    Classic concept: Auguste Comte

    astronomy

    physics

    chemistry

    biology

    sociology

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    7/59

    First Argument:

    Hierarchy of the Sciences

    Contemporary concepts:

    physical, biological, and social sciences

    exact versus non-exact sciences

    hard versus soft sciences

    paradigmatic versus pre-paradigmatic sciences

    natural versus human sciences

    sciences, humanities, and the arts

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    8/59

    First Argument:

    Hierarchy of the Sciences

    Empirical research (Simonton, 2004):

    Major scientific disciplines can be ordered along a

    single dimension using a large number of positive

    and negative indicators of hardness

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    9/59

    Simonton (2004)

    Positive indicators

    Peer evaluation consensus (Cole, 1983)

    Citation concentration (Cole, 1983)

    Early impact rate (Cole, 1983)

    Citation immediacy (Cole, 1983)

    Anticipation frequency (Hagstrom, 1974)

    Obsolescence rate (McDowell, 1982) Graph prominence (Cleveland, 1984)

    Rated disciplinary hardness (Smith et al., 2000)

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    10/59

    Simonton (2004)

    Negative indicators:

    Consultation rate (Suls & Fletcher, 1983)

    Theories-to-laws ratio (Roeckelein, 1997)

    Age at receipt of Nobel prize (Stephan & Leven,

    1993; see also Manniche & Falk, 1957)

    Lecture disfluency (Schachter, Christenfeld,Ravina, & Bilous, 1991)

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    11/59

    Simonton (2004)

    Yielding

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    12/59

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    13/59

    Former hierarchical arrangement

    consistent with scientists own

    perceptions of their domains,

    e.g.

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    14/59

    Prpi (2008) Natural scientistsN =310

    Social scientists

    N= 167

    Objectivity as the

    property of theresearch process

    69.0% 54.8%

    Objectivity as the

    researchers

    impartiality and

    nonsubjectivity

    33.6% 54.7%

    Objectivity as

    attainable and

    attained

    76.2% 52.5%

    Objectivity as its

    complete realization

    doubtful

    20.4% 30.3%

    Objectivity as

    impossible or

    nonexistent

    3.4% 17.2%

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    15/59

    Two Elaborations

    Extrapolation beyond Scientific Domains

    Interpolation within Creative Domains

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    16/59

    Two Elaborations

    One - This hierarchy can be extrapolated

    beyond scientific domains:

    Scientific versus artistic creativity, where

    creativity in the humanities falls somewherebetween that in the sciences and the arts

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    17/59

    Two Elaborations

    Illustrations using criteria previously applied

    in constructing scientific hierarchy:

    Obsolescence rate:

    psychology/sociology > history > English

    Lecture disfluency:

    psychology/sociology < political science < art history eminent writers (Raskin,

    1936)

    Mentors Eminent scientists < eminent artists (Simonton,

    1984, 1992b);

    with eminent psychologists between but closer to

    scientists in general (Simonton, 1992a)

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    37/59

    DevelopmentScience to Science

    Rebelliousness toward parents: chemists

    RS & NAS >

    Sigma Xi & US public

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    55/59

    Dispositional Predictors

    Compare with introspective reports:

    Albert Einstein: to these elementary laws there

    leads no logical path, but only intuition, supported

    by being sympathetically in touch withexperience.

    Max Planck: creative scientists must have a vivid

    intuitive imagination, for new ideas are not

    generated by deduction, but by an artisticallycreative imagination.

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    56/59

    Developmental Predictors

    Domain-typical creator unlikely givenSimontons (1986) N= 314 study ofbiographical typicality and eminence

    What about the other two options? Some indirect support for domain-regressive

    creator given that revolutionary scientists havehigher impact than normal scientists (Ko & Kim,2008; Sulloway, 2009)

    But also some inconsistent results andcomplications (see Sulloway, 2009)

    Hence, more research needed

    l

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    57/59

    Conclusion

    Domains of creativity fall along a dimension

    that has a psychological basis defined bydispositional traits and developmental

    experiences

    Creative achievement within a domain partlydepends on the same dispositional and

    developmental variables (viz. domain-

    regressive creators)

    Thus the need to invert and redefine the

    hierarchy

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    58/59

    FIELDS ARRANGED BY CREATIVITY

    MORE CREATIVE

  • 7/28/2019 Scientists Artists Psychologists

    59/59

    FIELDS ARRANGED BY CREATIVITY

    MORE CREATIVE

    http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.semp.us/_images/biots/Biot467PhotoI.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.semp.us/publications/newsletters_reader.php%3FNewsletterID%3D13&usg=__2FNFT4iI6enQ89-sTUP6oMmRkjI=&h=323&w=250&sz=13&hl=en&start=18&um=1&tbnid=bVArlSZm2B-5vM:&tbnh=118&tbnw=91&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpitirim%2Bsorokin%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-US%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/5582/sartre2tk2.jpg&imgrefurl=http://maxrennsflushing.blogspot.com/2008/06/jean-paul-sartre.html&usg=__6v45p0Swz0ShULd7lrxEqYCcb-E=&h=352&w=250&sz=30&hl=en&start=4&um=1&tbnid=SCw9XjAGeFo8LM:&tbnh=120&tbnw=85&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsartre%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-US%26sa%3DNhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://blog.syracuse.com/shelflife/2008/01/woolf.jpg&imgrefurl=http://blog.syracuse.com/shelflife/2008/01/writers_born_this_day_224.html&usg=__jEZlFj11tBEuyCcC7zmLWd7b7Cw=&h=3000&w=2328&sz=659&hl=en&start=6&tbnid=xvVV0W8AeCqFDM:&tbnh=150&tbnw=116&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dvirginia%2Bwoolf%26gbv%3D2%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26sa%3DXhttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.malaspina.org/gif/jamesw.jpg&imgrefurl=http://russellmcneil.blogspot.com/2007/09/william-james-1842-1910.html&usg=__VqamfTBzTJw29xbQ9mcV-oIKczM=&h=600&w=485&sz=48&hl=en&start=5&um=1&tbnid=o8Um4XlE4sUfpM:&tbnh=135&tbnw=109&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dwilliam%2Bjames%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-UShttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.laurengunderson.com/wp-content/images/DARWIN.GIF&imgrefurl=http://www.laurengunderson.com/%3Fpage_id%3D64&usg=__vIhYHwWE2zV2qSL0xdhYdP2jlm0=&h=421&w=320&sz=123&hl=en&start=6&um=1&tbnid=_lbcsk-B6WWFAM:&tbnh=125&tbnw=95&prev=/images%3Fq%3Ddarwin%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-UShttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.algosobre.com.br/images/stories/assuntos/biografias/Antoine_Lavoisier.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.algosobre.com.br/biografias/antoine-lavoisier.html&usg=__4PExzcx1nNSeZtSNwMOAc1wMJPA=&h=500&w=325&sz=23&hl=en&start=5&um=1&tbnid=klxxIAiPrTdHxM:&tbnh=130&tbnw=85&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dlavoisier%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-UShttp://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.newton.ac.uk/newton.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.newton.ac.uk/newton.html&usg=__v5gQuPiJqinS9b_SAUrAW3suuI4=&h=420&w=405&sz=21&hl=en&start=6&um=1&tbnid=QHsS9zTm722IBM:&tbnh=125&tbnw=121&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dnewton%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26safe%3Doff%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-US

Recommended