SciVal Spotlight:

IntroductionCampus ProfileCollection Analysis Tools

Elizabeth BrownBinghamton University LibrariesAugust 26, 2010

What is SciVal Spotlight? BU Campus Research Profile Collection Analysis Tools

Where and what are our faculty publishing?

Which areas are most influential? Compare BU strengths with peer

institutions (coming)

What is SciVal Spotlight?

Elsevier database Built from Scopus data Measures campus and discipline-based

research activity, authors, and collections Determines nature of inter-disciplinary

research Analyze and determine gaps in

collections support Identify collaborators and peers for

research collections

SciVal Databases

SciVal Spotlight – campus research profile

SciVal Funding – funding profiles SciVal Horizon (new) - SciVal Strata (coming in late 2010) –

research team profile

SciVerse – integrates Scopus, Scirus, introduces SciTopics and SciApplications

SciVerse – ScienceDirect

SciVerse - Scopus

Terminology

High Level Competencies = Subject or Program Low Level Competencies = Research Lab

Distinctive Competencies (DC) = Developed Project Emerging Competencies (EC) = Newer Project

Article Share = # publications at BU Relative Article Share (RAS) = # pubs compared to market

leader Relative Reference Share (RL) = # highly cited pubs compared

to market leader State of the Art (SotA) = shows recency of work cited

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) = Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) = Impact Factor (IF)

Campus Research Profile

BU Article Output and Citations

 

SUNY Binghamton, 2009, Global

Statistical Measure 2008 2009

Number Growth Number Growth

All publications

Market size (publications, Global) 7,760,137 6.2%  8,149,126 3.74% 

Publications from SUNY Binghamton 2,4467.53% 

2,774 2.87% 

Article share 0.032%1.23% 

0.034% -0.82% 

Citation count 12,457 10,364

Citations per article 5.09 3.74

Within competencies

Average publications per competency

10 52

Market size 8,028 12

Citations per article 8.1 9,444

Publication Distribution:High Level Competencies

2008 Data

2009 Data

High Level Competencies:Circle Map

2008 Data 2009 Data

Low Level Competencies:Circle Map

2008 Data 2009 Data

EC 16

DC 4

2009 Low Level Competencies:Table

Competencies Market size Growth Article Share Growth Rank RAS RL SotA

11 (DC) 354.1 0.28% 44.7 ( 12.64 %) 0.34% 1 1.57 1.25 -2.05

1 (DC) 699 1.51% 43.1 ( 6.16 %) -0.51% 1 1.21 2.18 0.9

20 (DC) 206.8 5.12% 42.5 ( 20.57 %) 1.90% 1 3.89 3.78 0.12

14 (DC) 277 13.49% 33.9 ( 12.24 %) 0.77% 1 1.78 0.43 1.24

4 (DC) 382.6 20.09% 33.8 ( 8.83 %) -0.75% 1 1.58 1.37 1.31

30 (EC) 133.5 14.21% 27.7 ( 20.73 %) 5.25% 2 0.92 0.87 0.14

6 (EC) 392.8 -5.10% 25.4 ( 6.47 %) -0.68% 2 0.71 0 -0.54

36 (EC) 119.9 12.07% 24.0 ( 20.00 %) 4.58% 2 0.59 0.22 2.47

25 (EC) 157.5 12.32% 22.5 ( 14.26 %) -0.64% 1 1.61 0.6 -1.19

8 (DC) 317.5 -0.58% 21.8 ( 6.85 %) 0.13% 1 1.42 0.82 0.96

11 (DC) 354.1 0.28% 44.7 ( 12.64 %) 0.34% 1 1.57 1.25 -2.05

1 (DC) 699 1.51% 43.1 ( 6.16 %) -0.51% 1 1.21 2.18 0.9

2009 Low Level Competencies: Matrix

Distinctive Competency 4

Emerging Competency 16

Distinctive Competency 4:2009 Data

DC 4 Characteristics

Journals and conference proceedings

Name (% of total)

SJR SCImago Journal Rank

SNIP Source normalized impact per paper.

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

(17.2%) 0.041 0.13

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

(11.2%) 0 0

Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP

(4.2%) 0 0

IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (2.2%) 0.098 1.359

IEEE Signal Processing Letters (2.1%) 0.066 0.78

DC 4 Competing Institutions

Institution Fractions Articles RL SotA Cited

SUNY Binghamton 33.8 39 1.37 1.31 179.9

Shanghai University 21.3 27 0.73 1.92 52.9

Information Engineering University China 20.1 28 0.22 1.76 31.7

University of Oxford 18.7 24 0.41 2.61 150.2

New Jersey Institute of Technology 15.9 20 0.2 0.11 22

Sun Yat-Sen University 15.8 20 0.27 0.57 5.7

University of Texas at San Antonio 13.4 19 0 -0.73 2.7

Sharif University of Technology 12.8 16 0 1.14 13.1

Dalian University of Technology 12.7 17 0 1.32 0.9

Peking University 12.6 15 0.27 1.4 5.5

Feng Chia University 12.5 24 0.08 1.67 3.6

Emerging Competency 16:2009 Data

EC 16 Characteristics

Why an EC and not a DC?

Criteria for a DC

EC 16 Journals

Name (% of total)

SJRSCImago Journal Rank

SNIPSource normalized impact per paper

American Antiquity (4.9%) 0.132 0.578

American Journal of Physical Anthropology (4.5%) 0.212 0.867

Southeastern Archaeology (4%) 0.037 0.195

Cambridge Archaeological Journal (3.8%) 0.041 0.302

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (3.4%) 0.074 0.51

Antiquity (2.6%) 0.122 0.291

Journal of Social Archaeology (2.5%) 0.035 0.108

EC 16 Competing Institutions

Institution Fractionalized articles

Articles

RL Reference Leadership

SotA State of the Art

Cited Citation count

1. University of Cambridge 7.5 22.0 0.31 -1.11 15.5

2. University of Oxford 7.0 18.0 0.06 1.38 28.2

3. University College London 6.2 21.0 0.25 3.83 13.5

4. SUNY Binghamton 6.2 9.0 0.50 2.10 12.9

5. University of Arizona 5.8 10.0 0.75 0.70 8.0

6. Ohio State University 5.3 9.0 0.44 0.42 7.5

7. University of Calgary 5.0 10.0 0.00 -0.34 5.9