+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Second Language Acquisition.2

Second Language Acquisition.2

Date post: 24-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: yair
View: 20 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
What?. Second Language Acquisition.2. Roml 700 Fall 2012. I know what this is!. But what are we supposed to do with it?. BUT…. “Helping Learners to learn does not require an understanding of SLA phenomena.” ICoSLA (International Commission on Second Language Acquisition). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
24
Second Language Acquisition.2 Roml 700 Fall 2012 1 What?
Transcript
Page 1: Second Language Acquisition.2

Second Language Acquisition.2

Roml 700Fall 2012

1

What?

Page 2: Second Language Acquisition.2

I know what this is!

But what are we

supposed to do with

it?

2

Page 3: Second Language Acquisition.2

BUT… “Helping Learners to learn does not require an

understanding of SLA phenomena.” ICoSLA (International Commission on Second Language

Acquisition)

3

Page 4: Second Language Acquisition.2

Cognitive Linguistics Efficiency grammatical structures of language are

directly associated with the way people conceptualize

Ronald Langacker: “grammar is conceptualization”

4

Page 5: Second Language Acquisition.2

Multi-competence – Integration continuum Mind of L2 user is a whole L1 + interlanguage + L2

Cook, 2002Grosjean, 2001

5

Page 6: Second Language Acquisition.2

Fundamental distinctions

Competence Performance Unconscious

knowledge of a grammatical system

How linguistic knowledge is used

6

Page 7: Second Language Acquisition.2

What do we teach?

7

Page 8: Second Language Acquisition.2

Oh, crap! this is going

to hurt!!

8

Page 9: Second Language Acquisition.2

Input Learner’s source of information is the target

language itself. Intake = Learner processes language

Language must fall within the learner’s range of comprehension.

Different learners have different intake levels.Krashen’s

I + 1

9

Page 10: Second Language Acquisition.2

Factors in traditional instructional methods that inhibit intake Strict sequencing Emphasis on productive skills Limited interaction

10

Page 11: Second Language Acquisition.2

Using English in the classroom: NO Children learning L1 can’t fall back on another

language. L1 and L2 should be kept in separate

compartments in the brain. Maximize quantity of exposure to L2. Use L2 for real life functions.

11

Page 12: Second Language Acquisition.2

Using English in the classroom: YES

Cognitive styles1. Acquisition Learning

hypothesis2. Monitor hypothesis3. Natural Order

hypothesis4. Input hypothesis5. Affective Filter

hypothesis

Wholists

Analytics

Verbalisers

Convergent thinkersDivergent thinkers

HolistsSerialists

Single dimension: right-brain to left-brainAdaptation-Innovation

HudsonWitkinOrnsteinRiding

12

Page 13: Second Language Acquisition.2

Using English in the classroom: HOW? Teachers

Instructions, explanations Use of L1 is supportive and facilitating scaffolding

Students Allows work within Zone of Proximal

Development Protects attitudinal balance between L1 and L2

ZPD: Lev Vigotsky, 1978

Clay, 2005Smagorinsky, 2007

13

Page 14: Second Language Acquisition.2

Why correct errors?

14

Page 15: Second Language Acquisition.2

15

Page 16: Second Language Acquisition.2

Acquisition theory Learner will stop making errors when ready Provide correct Input + 1

16

Page 17: Second Language Acquisition.2

Learning as process Make error obvious Model alternative Explain why it’s important to produce the correct

answer

17

Page 18: Second Language Acquisition.2

fossilization “stopping short” (incompleteness) of native

speaker proficiency

A central characteristic of any interlanguage is that it fossilizes… cases to develop at some point short of full identity with the target language. Tarone, 1994

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, (3), 209-231.

MotivationEgo boundaries

Lack of empathy with TL speakers

18

Page 19: Second Language Acquisition.2

Pragmatics Grammatical competence

Unconscious Implicit knowledge the speaker has about language Comes from the module of the mind associated with the

human language faculty Chomsky, 1965

PragmaticsReal world knowledgeNot innateThe result of non-language specific

abilities that change over the course of cognitive development

19

Page 20: Second Language Acquisition.2

How do we test achievement?

20

Page 21: Second Language Acquisition.2

21

Page 22: Second Language Acquisition.2

WantedProper descriptions of successful L2 users:

unique characteristics of grammar, vocabulary and pronunciation.

Progress assessment Is student a successful L2 user? (not “failed

native speaker”) What makes individual sense: specialized

goals.

22

Page 23: Second Language Acquisition.2

Proficiency assessment American Council of Teachers of Foreign Langu

ages Minnesota Language Proficiency Assessment Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Ed

ucation and Research , Penn State

University of IowaWorld Language Placement Testsdeveloped at Brigham Young

23

Achievement and Placement

Page 24: Second Language Acquisition.2

24


Recommended