Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | roy-gregory |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Secret is… Something that is kept or meant to be kept unknown or unseen by others; there is a commitment madebetween the secret teller and the secret bearer.
1. To study the behavior of secret telling (literature search)
2. To investigate the influencing factors of secret telling(experimental research)
Risk Revelation Model:
decisions people go through when they are considering whether or not to reveal their secret to someone.
http://www.natcom.org/CommCurrentsArticle.aspx?id=927
1. Telling their own secret:
Factors driving people to reveal their secrets:
A. She should know this… B. After several years, it is no longer a big deal.C. I don’t know how to begin...
http://www.natcom.org/CommCurrentsArticle.aspx?id=927
1. Telling their own secret:
6preparation and rehearsal
directness
third party revelations
entrapmentindirect mediums
incremental disclosures
http://www.natcom.org/CommCurrentsArticle.aspx?id=927
1. Telling their own secret:
admitted having the urge to reveal someone's secret
Gossiped with a close friend from anotherfriendship group.
Had told someone completely uninvolved
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/6199822/Women-cannot-keep-a-secret-for-longer-than-47-hours.html
GOSSIP:the exchange of personal information (positive or negative) in an evaluative way (positive or negative) about absent third parties.
A and B talking about C
Secret tellingPersonal obligation of keeping secret (vs. Gossiping)The credibility established in social cognition and
relationships
Terms
• Secret teller• Secret owner• Secret bearer Interviewee• Interviewer*• Accomplice
Hypothesis 1
• More likely to disclose a 3rd person secret• Consider the secret to spread => less responsibility in keeping the secret
Hypothesis 2
• Informal environment – less alert and protective
• Exposure of secret gossip process• Larger chance to disclose the secret
Experimental Design• Secret teller secret secret bearer• Tested under different circumstances
Experimental Design• Accomplice may exist (depends on the
formality)• Evaluate the extent of disclosure of the
secret
Experimental Design
• Parameters - The closeness of the secret owner to the secret bearer - The formality environment of the instigation
Formality
Closeness(owner / bearer)
1st person / Formal (1F)
1st person / Informal (1I)
3rd person / Formal (3F)
3rd person / Informal (3I)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
• Environment of instigation - Formal condition - Informal condition
Target
• Common friend : secret teller/ interviewer
Procedure of Experiment
• Implantation of secret - Secret – Athlete’s foot - Patient/Cause/Symptoms
Procedure of Experiment
• Implantation of secret - Secret teller initiate an informal chat with the target
Procedure of Experiment
• Implantation of secret - 1st Person secret - Revealed the secret initiatively - Pretended : sharing worries about the disease
• Implantation of secret - 3rd Person secret - Revealed the secret accidentally - Pretended : sending the message to wrong person
Procedure of Experiment
• Instigation – Formal environment - Interview about ‘大學生戀愛觀與皮膚問題’ - Question about athlete’s foot
Procedure of Experiment
Procedure of Experiment
• Instigation – Informal environment - Informal chat - A sample of salve for curing athlete’s foot
Pilot Study
• An interview through whatsapp
/Improvements made after
the Pilot Study
• Accomplice was needed• face-to-face interview with accomplice• secret bearer feel less obliged in holding
back the secret
Improvements made after the Pilot Study
• Contrast the formal and informal situation• Informal – casual chatting by text
messaging• Formal – Interview with accomplice
Data Collection
• Identity – 3• Cause – 3• Symptoms and Other Details – 2
1F I C S & D Total Gp. Avg.
1 0 0 0 0 0.286 s.d. 0.756
2 0 0 0 0 n 7
3 0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 0 2
6 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0
1st Person / Formal
I : IdentityC: Cause
S&D: Symptoms and Other Details
3rd Person / Formal3F I C S & D Total Gp. Avg.
1 0 0 0 0 0.571 s.d. 0.976
2 0 0 0 0 n 7
3 1 1 0 2
4 0 0 0 0
5 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0
7 1 1 0 2
I : IdentityC: Cause
S&D: Symptoms and Other Details
1st Person / Informal1I I C S & D Total Gp. Avg.
1 0 0 0 0 2.571 s.d. 2.507
2 2 2 1 5 n 7
3 0 0 0 0
4 2 2 1 5
5 0 0 0 0
6 1 1 1 3
7 2 2 1 5
I : IdentityC: Cause
S&D: Symptoms and Other Details
3rd Person / Informal3I I C S & D Total Gp. Avg.
1 2 3 1 6 3.286 s.d 3.094
2 0 0 0 0 n 7
3 2 3 1 6
4 0 0 0 0
5 2 2 1 5
6 2 2 2 6
7 0 0 0 0
I : IdentityC: Cause
S&D: Symptoms and Other Details
Two sample test – t-testSame Formality / Different Closenesst1F/3F = 0.612
t1I/3I = 0.475
tc = 2.179 (95%)
Comparison
Two sample test – t-testSame Closeness / Different Formalityt1F/1I = 2.309
t3F/3I = 2.214
tc = 2.179 (95%)
Comparison
There is no significant difference between two group with different closeness but constant formality
There is significant difference between two group with different formality but constant closeness
Independent of the closeness between the secret bearer and the secret owner (1st person secret / 3rd person secret)
commitment made between the secret bearer and the secret teller
Dependent on the formality of the environment The less formal the environment, the closer the
secret bearer would feel towards the interviewerWhen this distance of the relative closeness is smaller
than the distance of that between the secret bearer and the secret teller, he would be more likely to tell gossip
One of the secret bearer spread the secret to other friends, who coincidentally are our other targets, right after knowing the secret but before the interview.
Special Case
Target may reveal the secret to others before the instigation
Hard to quantize and give it a fair score for comparison and analysis
Specific phrases used during instigation
Sample type: low variety due to common friends (age, education level, cultural difference…)
Invite more friends to help us outSample size: time limitation
Situation dependent of the instigation processBinary conditionmore specific conditions
Target may not remember the secret and the detailsOptimize period between implantation and instigation (preferably 3 days)
Limitations and Improvements
More parametersBetter quantization methodResearch on whether internet would instigate more
people to spill their secrets being anonymous
Initially we think:1. Difference between 1st and 3rd person secret Propagated; less obligated2. Difference between formality of situation Alertness to the secret
Based on our result: 1. Independent of 1st and 3rd person 2. Dependent on the formality of situation
Credibility established may differ in different situations.
Secret Teller ??? Interviewer
Secret Bearer