Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐1
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
Section 2.8 Water Supply and Groundwater
ThissectiondescribesthegeneralwatersupplyconditionsofbothpotablewaterandgroundwaterintheCounty,pertinentregulationsthatgovernwatersupplyandgroundwater,andthepotentialforimpactsonwatersupplyandgroundwater(asrelatedtosupply)asaresultofprojectimplementation.Othertopicsrelatedtoutilitiesandservicesystems,suchasneworexpandedfacilities,wastewatertreatment,stormwaterdrainage,andsolidwastearediscussedinChapter3aseffectsfoundnotsignificantduringtheInitialStudy.HydrologicalconditionsandsurfaceandgroundwaterwaterqualityareaddressedinSection2.5,HydrologyandWaterQuality.
2.8.1 Existing Conditions
AvailablewatersupplyresourcesandtheorganizationsresponsibleforobtainingandconveyingthemvaryacrosstheCounty.Thefollowingdiscussionorganizesthesedifferingresources/organizationsbycategory:(1)thoseareasthatareservedbywaterdistrictsthatobtainimportedwaterastheirprimarysupplysource,and(2)areasthatmainlyrelyongroundwater,whicharefurtherbrokendownintoareasservedbygroundwater‐dependentwaterdistrictsandareasservedbyprivatewells.Finally,thissectionidentifiesgroundwateravailabilityandqualityissuesthatcouldhaveaneffectonpublichealth.
2.8.1.1 Imported Water Service Areas
MostofSanDiegoCounty’spotablewatersupplyisimportedfromsourcessuchastheColoradoRiverandtheNorthernCaliforniaBay‐Delta.Morethan50percentoftheregion’swatercomesfromtheColoradoRiver,andabout30percentcomesfromtheBay‐Delta.Localsupplies,includingsurface,ground,recycled,andconservedwater,currentlymeetabout20percentoftheregion’swaterdemand(SDCWA2015a).
TheMetropolitanWaterDistrict(MWD)managesandcoordinatesthedeliveryofimportedwatersuppliesfromtheColoradoRiverandBay‐DeltathroughtheStateWaterProjectwithinsixsouthernCaliforniacounties—Ventura,LosAngeles,Orange,Riverside,SanBernardino,andSanDiego.Regionalwaterauthoritiesordistricts,whicharepublicagenciesestablishedundertheCountyWaterAuthorityAct(CaliforniaStateWaterCode,Chapter45,Section2),acquirewholesalewaterfromMWD.TheSanDiegoCountyWaterAuthority(SDCWA)isaregionalwaterauthoritythatisoneofMWD’s26memberagencies.SDCWAreceivespurchasedwaterthatisfurtherdistributedto24memberwateragenciesservingSanDiegoCounty.
FifteenwaterdistrictsservetheunincorporatedCounty,importingthemajorityoftheirwaterfromSDCWAthroughMWD.ThelocationandboundariesoftheSDCWAmemberdistrictsareshownonFigure2.8‐1.Thefollowingidentifiesthewaterdistricts.
FallbrookPublicUtilityDistrict(FPUD) RamonaMunicipalWaterDistrict(RamonaMWD)
HelixWaterDistrict(HWD) RincondelDiabloMunicipalWaterDistrict(RDDMWD)
LakesideWaterDistrict(LWD) SantaFeIrrigationDistrict(SFID)
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐2
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
OlivenhainMunicipalWaterDistrict(OMWD)
SweetwaterAuthority/SouthBayIrrigationDistrict(SA/SB)
OtayWaterDistrict(OWD) VallecitosWaterDistrict(VWD)
PadreDamMunicipalWaterDistrict(PDMWD)
ValleyCenterMunicipalWaterDistrict(VCMWD)
RainbowMunicipalWaterDistrict(RMWD) VistaIrrigationDistrict(VID)
YuimaMunicipalWaterDistrict(YMWD)
Thesedistrictsimportmost,ifnotall,oftheirwatersupplyfromSDCWAandsupplementanyremainingdemandwithlocalsupplies,includinggroundwaterwells.Thedistrictsthatobtain30percentormoreoftheirwatersupplyfromlocalsourcesareSA/SB(30percent),VID(30percent),andYMWD(58percent).Allofthe15waterdistrictsservingtheunincorporatedCountyhavepreparedUrbanWaterManagementPlans(UWMPs)tosupporttheirlong‐termresourceplanningandensureadequatewatersuppliesareavailabletomeetexistingandfuturewaterdemands.
Urban Water Management Planning
Themostcurrentsupplyanddemandprojectionsforwaterdistrictsarecontainedintheirrespective2010UWMPs.SDCWAmemberdistrictsrelyheavilyontheUWMPsandIntegratedResourcesPlans(IRPs)ofMWDandtheRegionalWaterFacilitiesMasterPlanofSDCWAfordocumentationofsuppliesavailabletomeetprojecteddemands(CountyofSanDiego2011).
In2010,MWDadopteditscurrentRegionalUWMP.MWD'sreliabilityassessmentshowedthatMWDcanmaintainreliablewatersuppliestomeetprojecteddemandthrough2035.MWDidentifiedbuffersupplies,includingotherStateWaterProjectgroundwaterstorageandtransfersthatcouldservetosupplyadditionalwaterneeds.MWD’sIRPoutlinesastrategytoincreasewatersuppliesandlowerdemands.
SDCWAadopteditscurrentUWMPinJune2011.SDCWAanditsmemberagencieshavemadeconsiderableprogressinconservinganddiversifyingitssupplies.SDCWA'sUWMPdocumentsexistingandplannedwatersupplies,includingMWDsupplies(importedColoradoRiverwaterandStateWaterProjectwater),SDCWAsupplies(watertransfersupplies,canalliningprojectwatersupplies,andseawaterdesalinationsupplies),andlocalmemberagencysupplies(surfacewaterreservoirs,waterrecycling,groundwaterandgroundwaterrecovery).SDCWA's2010UWMPreportsthattheSanDiegoregionhasconservedanaverageofover15,141acre‐feetperyearbetween2005and2010.Partofthisconservationcameasaresultoftheimplementationofseveralwaterconservationandtransferagreements,includingtheSDCWA/ImperialIrrigationDistrict(IID)transferagreement.
BasedonSDCWA'swatersupplyreliabilityassessmentascontainedinitscurrentUWMP,SDCWAconcludesthatiftheSDCWAandmemberagencywatersuppliesaredevelopedasplanned,alongwithimplementationofMWD'sIRP,supplieswillbeadequatetoserveexistingandprojecteddemandswithinSDCWA'sserviceareaunderaverage,single‐dry,ormultiple‐dryyearsthrough2035.SDCWA'scurrentUWMPdisclosesthatSDCWAisatriskintheearlieryearsforwatershortagesbecausetheCarlsbadSeawaterDesalinationprojectisnotonlineandtheIIDtransfersupplieshavenotyetfullyrampeduptomaximumdeliveries.However,afterthereleaseofthe
CWA VISTAIRRIGATION
CWA RINCON DEL
DIABLO MUNIWATER DIST
CWA RAMONAMUNI
WATER DIST
CWA RAINBOWMUNI WATER
DISTRICT
CWA YUIMAMUNI
WATER DIST
CWA FALLBROOKPUBLIC UTILITY
CWASOUTH BAYIRRIGATION
CWA VALLEYCENTER MUNIWATER DIST
CWA VALLECITOSCOUNTY WATER
DISTRICT
CWA OTAYWATER
DISTRICT
CWA SANTA FEIRRIGATION DIST
CWA OLIVENHAINMUNI WATER
DIST
CWA HELIXWATER
DISTRICT
CWA PADREDAM MUNI
WATER DISTUV52
UV54
UV76
UV67
UV94
UV79
UV905
UV78
UV75
§̈¦8
§̈¦805
§̈¦163
§̈¦5
§̈¦15
JulianJulian
BorregoBorregoSpringsSprings
ValleyValleyCenterCenter
BonsallBonsall
HiddenHiddenMeadowsMeadowsTwinTwin
OaksOaks
CentralCentralMountainMountain CuyamacaCuyamaca
BaronaBarona
PinePineValleyValley
DescansoDescanso
AlpineAlpineMountainMountainEmpireEmpireCrest -Crest -
DehesaDehesaValle De OroValle De Oro
RainbowRainbow
Pala -Pala -PaumaPauma
DesertDesert
San DieguitoSan Dieguito
PalomarPalomarMountainMountain
JacumbaJacumbaBoulevardBoulevardLakeLake
Morena /Morena /CampoCampo
PotreroPotrero
TecateTecate
JamulJamul
OtayOtay
SweetwaterSweetwater
SpringSpringValleyValley
LakesideLakeside
NorthNorthCountyCountyMetroMetro
NorthNorthMountainMountain
RamonaRamona
FallbrookFallbrookPendletonPendleton- De Luz- De Luz
Figure 2.8-1Water Districts
County of San Diego Agriculture Promotion Program
±Source: Water Districts - County of San Diego (2015);
Background Files - SanGIS (2015); BLM (2015).
0 105
Miles
K:\Sa
n Dieg
o\proj
ects\
Coun
ty_of_
SanD
iego\0
0054
_15_
Ag_P
romoti
on\m
apdo
c\EIR
\Fig0
2_8_
1_Wa
terDis
tricts.
mxd D
ate: 3
/24/20
16 2
4991
DistrictFallbrook Public UtilityHelix Water DistrictOlivenhahn Municipal Water DistrictOtay Water DistrictPadre Dam Municipal Water DistrictRainbow Municipal Water DistrictRamona Municipal Water DistrictRincon Del Diablo Municipal Water DistrictSanta Fe Irrigation DistrictSouth Bay IrrigationVallecitos County Water DistrictValley Center Municipal Water DistrictVista IrrigationYuima Municipal Water District
Community/Subregional Planning AreasIncorporated Cities (Not a Part of Project)Tribal, Military, and State Parks (Not a Part of Project)Lakes/ReservoirsRiversFreewaysHighways
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐3
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
currentUWMP,theCarlsbadSeawaterDesalinationprojecthasbeencompletedandisdeliveringwatertothebusinessesandresidentsofSanDiegoCountyasofDecember2015.Aftersuccessfullycompletingconstruction,theplanthasalreadyproducedmorethan1.5billiongallonsoflocallycontrolledwaterforSanDiegoCounty,helpingtominimizetheregion’svulnerabilitytothestatewidedrought(CarlsbadDesalinationProject2015).TheshortagesprojectedintheUWMPforthelateryearsaredueprimarilytoincreasedwaterdemandfromregionalgrowth.Toalleviatethisrisk,SDCWAispursuingdevelopmentofcarryoverstorage,andadditionalregionalshortagemanagementmeasures,consistentwiththeSDCWA’sWaterShortageandDroughtResponsePlan,tofillthesupplyshortfall.
Urbanwatermanagementplanningcontinuestoaddresschangesinstateandlocalconditions.Basedonthe2015guidelines,the2015updatestotheUWMPswilllikelyaddressrecentdevelopments,includingconsecutiveyearsofreducedprecipitationandcutbacksintheregionalimportedwatersupplyduetotheseverityofCalifornia’sdroughtandapplicablerecentchangestotheCaliforniaWaterCodesincethe2010UWMPs.Allofthe15individualmemberagenciesservingtheunincorporatedCountyhavecompleted2010UWMPsandarepreparing2015updates.
Inaddition,UWMPprojectionsforfuturewaterdemandsandwatersuppliesareincorporatedintoaregion‐wideplanningeffortbytheSDCWA.The2013RegionalWaterFacilitiesOptimizationandMasterPlanUpdatepreparedbySDCWApresentsbothlong‐termoptionsandrecommendationstomeetfuturewaterdemandsaswellastheplanforimplementingmajorcapitalimprovementstomeetdemandsthrough2030.AccordingtoSDCWA,acombinationofstorageandnewsupplieswouldprovideareliablesolutiontoalleviatingrisksduringadryperiod.FurtherdiscussionondroughtconditionsintheStateofCaliforniaisprovidedbelow.
Drought Conditions
Droughtoccursasaresultoflowerthanaverageannualrainfallforanextendedperiodoftime.Droughtismeasuredbyaseriesofhydrologicindicators,recordeddata,andlocalclimaticconditions.Theseverityofdroughtrangesfromabnormallydryandmoderatetosevere,extreme,andexceptional.AsofOctober2015,mostofSanDiegoCountyiscategorizedashavingsevereandextremedrought(U.S.DroughtMonitor2015).Asaresultofglobalclimatechangefactors,droughtpatternsmaychangeorintensify(seeSection2.1,AirQualityandGreenhouseGases,forfurtherdiscussion),andextendedperiodsoflowprecipitationhaveaneffectonlocalandstatewatersuppliesandstoragelevels.
Californiaiscurrentlyexperiencingamulti‐yeardrought.AsofNovember30,2015,statewidehydrologicconditionswereasfollows:precipitation,80percentofaveragetodate;runoff,35percentofaveragetodate;andreservoirstorage,50percentofaverageforthedate.SacramentoRiverunimpairedrunoffobservedthroughNovember30,2015,wasabout0.6millionacre‐feet,whichisabout44percentofaverage(DWR2015a).
OnApril1,2015,GovernorEdmundG.Brown,Jr.issuedthefourthinaseriesofExecutiveOrdersonactionsnecessarytoaddressCalifornia'sseveredroughtconditions,whichdirectedtheStateWaterBoardtoimplementmandatorywaterreductionsinurbanareastoreducepotableurbanwaterusageby25percentstatewide.OnMay5,2015,theStateWaterBoardadoptedanemergencyconservationregulationinaccordancewiththeGovernor'sdirective.TheprovisionsoftheemergencyregulationwentintoeffectonMay18,2015.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐4
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
However,theemergencyregulationallowsurbanwatersupplierstosubtractwaterdeliveredforcommercialagriculturefromtotalpotablewaterproductionifthesuppliermeetscertainconditions.OneoftheconditionsrequiresthesuppliertocertifyinwritingtotheStateWaterBoardthatallwatersubtractedfromtotalpotablewaterproductionisbeingservedforcommercialagricultureusethatmeetsthedefinitionofGovernmentCodeSection51201,Subdivision(b).Otherconditionsincludepreparationofagriculturalwatermanagementplansandestablishmentofconservationstandards.AsofOctober2015,certificationsinSanDiegoCountyreceivedbytheStateWaterBoardsinclude:FallbrookPublicUtilityDistrict,CityofOceanside,OlivenhainMunicipalWaterDistrict,CityofPoway,RainbowMunicipalWaterDistrict,RanchoCaliforniaWaterDistrict,CityofSanDiego,SanDieguitoWaterDistrict,SantaFeIrrigationDistrict,VallecitosWaterDistrict,andValleyCenterWaterDistrict(SWRCB2015b).
Althoughweatherconditionschangeandwaterresourceshavevariedfromyeartoyear,thelowrainfalloverthepast4yearshasreducedavailablewatersuppliesandloweredgroundwaterlevels.Calendaryear2014wasCalifornia'sdriestyearinrecordsdatingtothe1800s,andwaterconditions4monthsintoanewwateryear(October1,2014,throughSeptember30,2015)suggestthestate'sdroughtispushingintoitsfourthconsecutiveyear(DWR2015d).
InJuly2015,MWDcutwatersuppliestoSDCWAanditsothercustomersby15percentbecauseofreduceddeliveriesfromtheStateWaterProjectandshrinkingstoragereserves.LocalinvestmentsinreliablewatersuppliessuchastheCarlsbadDesalinationProjectandindependentwatertransfersfromtheImperialValleywouldallowSDCWAtooffsetalmostallofthereductioninsuppliesfromMWDinfiscalyear2016.SDCWAexpectstohaveenoughwatersuppliestomeetabout99percentofthetypicaldemandsbyitsmemberagenciesfortheyear2016startingJuly1.Nevertheless,SDCWAmemberagenciesareunderstateorderstoreducewateruseby12to36percentregardlessofavailablewatersupplies(SDCWA2015b).IftheprojectedMWD,SDCWA,andmemberagencysuppliesaredevelopedasplanned,nowatershortagesareanticipatedwithintheSDCWAserviceareaundernormalwateryear,singledrywateryear,ormultipledrywateryearconditionsthrough2035(SDCWA2011).The2015UWMPupdateswillincludeadiscussionofdrought‐responsemeasuresandstrategiesformitigatingpotentialsupplyshortagesunderashortagecontingencyanalysis.Assuch,changesinconditionsincludingstatewidedroughtareconsideredwithinregionalandindividualUWMPefforts.
2.8.1.2 Groundwater‐Dependent Areas
TheimportedwaterdeliveredbyMWDanddistributedlocallybySDCWAonlyservesaportionofthetotalunincorporatedpopulation.Geographically,themajorityoftheunincorporatedarea(65percent)locatedroughlywithinandeastofthePalomarandCuyamacamountainsisreliantuponeitherseparategroundwater‐dependentdistrictsorprivatewellsthatareunaffiliatedwithSDCWA.Regardlessoftheresponsibleprovider,alloftheseareasareentirelyreliantongroundwaterandassucharesubjecttoitsavailability.ThefollowingdescribesgroundwateravailabilityintheCounty,issuesarounditsavailability,andgroundwaterproviders.
Groundwater Hydrology
SanDiegoCountyoverliesacomplexgroundwaterresourcethatvariesgreatlythroughouttheregion.TheCountyhasthreegeneralcategoriesofaquifers:alluvialandsedimentary,fracturedrock,anddesertbasinaquifers.Figure2.8‐2showsthedistributionoftheseaquifertypesthroughoutthe
Figure 2.8-2Aquifer Types
County of San Diego Agriculture Promotion Program
K:\Sa
n Dieg
o\proj
ects\
Coun
ty_of_
SanD
iego\0
0054
_15_
Ag_P
romoti
on\m
apdo
c\EIR
\Fig0
2_8_
2_Aq
uifer_
Type
s.mxd
Date
: 3/24
/2016
249
91
Source: County of San Diego General Plan Update, April 2010
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐5
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
County.Thecharacteristicsoftheseaquifersarediscussedbelow,asarecurrentCountygroundwaterhydrologyissues.
Alluvial and Sedimentary
Alluvialandsedimentaryaquifersaccountforapproximately13percentoftheunincorporatedareaoftheCounty(CountyofSanDiego2011).Alluvialandsedimentaryaquifersaretypicallyfoundinriverandstreamvalleys,aroundlagoons,nearthecoastline,andintheintermountainvalleys.Sedimentsintheseaquifersarecomposedofmostlyconsolidated(definedassedimentaryrock)orunconsolidated(definedasalluviumorcolluvium)gravel,sand,silt,andclay.Becauseofthehighhydraulicconductivity,porosity,andstoragetheyareconsideredgoodaquifers.However,whilealluvialandsedimentaryaquifersusuallyhavegreaterstoragethanfracturedrockaquifers,theysometimeshavelowrechargeratesbecausetheyarelocatedinareasoftheCountythatreceivelessprecipitation.Manyalluvialbasinsoccurinlow‐lyingareasofawatershed.Thus,surfacewaterrunoffaccumulatesinstreams,lakes,orothersurfacedepressionswithinalluvialbasinsandprovidesadditionalrechargesources.Wellsinanalluvialorsedimentaryaquifertypicallyyieldrelativelyhighvolumesofwater.Coarse‐grainedsedimentssuchassandorgraveltypicallyproducehighervolumesofwaterthanfiner‐grainedsedimentssuchassiltsorclays.Incoarse‐grainedsediments,wellyieldsmaybehundredsofgallonsperminuteandlimitedbyinefficienciesinthewellitself,ratherthanbylimitationsintheaquifer’sabilitytoproducewater.Overall,alluvialandsedimentaryaquifersaremorereliableanddesirableasagroundwatersourcethanfracturedrockaquifers.Accordingly,croplandoverlyinganalluvialorsedimentaryaquiferreceivesahigherratingbytheLocalAgriculturalResourceAssessment(LARA)model.
Fractured Rock
Fracturedrockunderliesapproximately73percentoftheunincorporatedareaoftheCounty(CountyofSanDiego2011).Fracturedrockaquifersaregenerallyfoundwithinthefoothillsandmountains.Becausetheseareasgenerallyreceivemoreprecipitationthanthelowerelevations,therechargeratesarerelativelyhigh.However,thestoragecapacityoffracturedrockaquifersislow;thus,pumpingfromwellscancausethewatertabletodeclinemuchmorequicklythanalluvialorsedimentaryaquifers,anddroughtconditionsalsoproducemoredramaticeffects.Wellsdrilledinafracturedrockaquifertypicallyyieldrelativelylowvolumesofwater.Insomeinstances,wellsmayderivewaterfromonlyafewwater‐bearingfractures.Additionally,itisdifficulttoestimatepotentialproductionratesforanynewwellsdrilledinfracturedrockaquifers,andwellsdrilledclosetogethermayhavesignificantlydifferentwaterproductionrates.Thisisbecausewater‐producingfracturelocationsaredifficulttoidentifyandpredict,andfracturesintersectedbyonewellmaynotbeintersectedbynearbywells.Inshort,ifgroundwateristheonlyavailablewatersource,afracturedrockaquiferisalessdesirablesourcethanalluvialandsedimentaryaquifers.ThisisevidencedbytheCounty’sLARAModelforagriculturalresources,whichgiveslowerratingstocroplandthatutilizesgroundwaterfromafracturedrockaquifer.
Desert Basins
Desertbasinsaccountforapproximately14percentoftheunincorporatedareaoftheCounty(CountyofSanDiego2011).DesertbasinsarefoundintheextremeeasternareaoftheCounty.Ingeneral,desertbasinaquifersarecharacterizedbyextremelylimitedgroundwaterrechargebuttypicallyhavelargestoragecapacities.DesertbasinaquiferswithintheCountyarecomposedofunconsolidatedsedimentsthattypicallyhavestoragecapacitiesrangingfrom5to30percentofthe
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐6
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
totalaquifervolume.Thestorageofanindividualbasinisafunctionofthesizeofthebasin,depthofthesaturatedsediments,andthetypeofsedimentscomprisingthebasin.Precipitationinthisareaistypicallyonlyafewinchesperyearinthevalleyofthebasins.Runoffandstreamflowfromthehighlandstypicallyrechargealongthemarginsofthebasins.Desertbasinaquifersaregenerallycharacterizedbyextremelylimitedrechargeandlargestoragecapacities.TheLARAmodelgiveslowerratingstocroplandthatutilizesgroundwaterfromadesertbasin.Desertbasinsaquifersaretheleastdesirablesourcesofgroundwater.
Groundwater Availability Issues
Aquiferswithlimitedgroundwaterinstorage(e.g.,fracturedrockaquifers)and/orlimitedgroundwaterrecharge(e.g.,desertareas)mayexperienceshortagesfromlargegroundwaterusers,suchaswatercompaniesordistricts,agriculture,orotherlargeoperations.Areaswithlargequantitygroundwaterusesunderlainbyfracturedrockaquiferswithlittletonoresiduumareparticularlysusceptibletolocalizedgroundwaterproblems.In1991,theCountyadoptedtheSanDiegoCountyGroundwaterOrdinance,whichcontainsresidentialdensitycontrolswithminimumparcelsizesbasedonmeanannualprecipitation.AreasthatweredevelopedpriortotheimplementationoftheGroundwaterOrdinancemayhavebeendevelopedatdensitieshigherthanwouldbecurrentlyallowed,whichinsomecaseshasledtolocalizedgroundwaterproblems.AreaswhereprojectsarenotsubjecttoCountyregulations,suchastheBaronagolfcourseandcasinoontheBaronareservation,mayalsoresultindevelopmentthatisnotsuppliedwithadequategroundwaterresources.Inallofthesecases,itispossiblethatgroundwatershortagesoccurbecausethegroundwaterdemandintheseareascouldexceedthenaturalrechargeoftheaquifers,especiallyindroughtyears.Thefollowingsummarizestheexistinggroundwaterhydrologyissuesfacingthegroundwater‐dependentportionoftheunincorporatedCounty,byexaminingthreecategories:wellyield,largequantity/clusteredgroundwaterusers,andBorregoValley.
Well Yield
AreaswithintheunincorporatedCountywiththepotentialforlowwellyieldareshowninFigure2.8‐3.Thereareanumberoffactorsthatdeterminethelong‐termyieldforawellinfracturedrockaquifers,includingthenumberoffracturesintersected,aperture(fractureopeningsizes),spacing,orientation,andinterconnectivityoffractures,theamountofrecharge,theamountofgroundwaterinstorageinthesurroundingaquifer,othernearbygroundwaterextraction,andtheinstallationtechniquesforawell.Additionally,whilelowwellyieldsarepossibleanywherewithinfracturedrockaquiferareas,steepslopeareasabovethevalleyfloorareparticularlypronetohavinglowerwellyield.Thisislargelyduetostoragevaluesinsteepslopeareasoftenbeingsubstantiallylowerthanvalleyareas,andhavingasmallertributarywatershedthanwellslocatedinvalleyareas.TheCountyofSanDiego’sGeneralPlanUpdate,AppendixD:GroundwaterStudy(CountyofSanDiego2011)reportsthatthemedianwellyieldinfracturedrockaquiferswasapproximately15gallonsperminute(gpm).However,actualdatavariedsubstantially.Forexample,in86wells(approximately11percentofwellsreviewed),wellyieldwasreportedaslessthan3gpm.Thesewellsmaystruggletomeetthedemandsofasingle‐familyresidence.Severalwellsalsoreportedawellyieldgreaterthan100gpm.
Wellsinanalluvialorsedimentaryaquifertypicallyyieldrelativelyhighvolumesofwater.Coarse‐grainedsedimentssuchassandorgraveltypicallyproducehighervolumesofwaterthanfiner‐grainedsedimentssuchassiltsorclays.Incoarse‐grainedsediments,wellyieldsmaybehundredsofgallonsperminuteandbelimitedbyinefficienciesinthewellitself,ratherthanbylimitationsin
Figure 2.8-3Areas of Low Well Yield
County of San Diego Agriculture Promotion Program
K:\Sa
n Dieg
o\proj
ects\
Coun
ty_of_
SanD
iego\0
0054
_15_
Ag_P
romoti
on\m
apdo
c\EIR
\Fig0
2_8_
3_Lo
wWell
YieldA
reas.m
xd D
ate: 3
/24/20
16 2
4991
Source: County of San Diego General Plan Update, April 2010
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐7
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
theaquifer’sabilitytoproducewater.Thegroundwaterstudy(DPLU2009f)reportedthatthemedianwellyieldforalluvialandsedimentaryaquiferswasapproximately36gpm.ThehighestwellyieldswerereportedinWarnerValley,JacumbaValley,andthePala‐PaumaValleySubregion.Severalwellsaveragedgreaterthan500gpmandonewellinWarnerValleyreportedaveraging1,500gpm.
Desertbasinwellstypicallyyieldrelativelyhighvolumesofwaterduetothecoarse‐grainednatureofthealluvialsediments.Becausedesertbasinwellsmaybecapableofyieldsinexcessof1,000gpm,andrechargeratescanbeextremelylow,itiseasytopumpmorewaterfromthebasinthanwillbenaturallyrecharged.Excessivepumpingthatexceedstherateofrechargeresultsinagroundwateroverdraftsituation,whichisnotsustainableforlong‐termgroundwateruse.SuchaconditioncurrentlyexistsintheBorregoValleyareaoftheunincorporatedCounty.
Thegroundwaterstudy(DPLU2009f)reportedthatallsteepslopeareasinthebackcountryhavethepotentialforlowwellyield,whichcouldresultinarapiddeclineofthewatertableandgroundwateravailability.Thisislargelyduetostoragevaluesinsteepslopeareasoftenbeingsubstantiallylowerthanvalleyareas,andhavingasmallertributarywatershedthanwellslocatedinvalleyareas.RamonaTrailsDriveintheRamonaCommunityPlanningArea(CPA)isagoodexampleofasteepslopeareawithlowyieldingwells.Inaddition,thegroundwaterstudyidentifiedthreespecificareasinLakeside(OldBaronaRoad,StateRoute67,andWildcatCanyonRoad)andMorenaVillageashavingahighfrequencyofwellswithlowwellyield.WellnetworksinLakesidehaveexamplesofwellswithextremevariationsofwaterlevels,withdeclinesof500feetrecordedandrecoveryofthewatertablebyasmuchas450feetinasinglewetseason.Periodictruckingofimportedwatermaybeneededintheseareastomeettheneedsofatypicalsingle‐familyresidence.
Large Quantity/Clustered Groundwater Users
BecauseproductionwellsforresidentialandagriculturalwaterusesarenotmeteredorregulatedforwaterquantitybytheCounty,futurelocalizedgroundwaterproblemsarepossibleanywhereintheCountyfromlargequantitygroundwaterusers.Inaddition,areasthatweredevelopedpriortotheimplementationoftheGroundwaterOrdinance(Section2.8.2.3,LocalRegulations)mayhavebeendevelopedatdensitieshigherthanwouldbecurrentlyallowed.Thishasresultedintheclusteringofgroundwaterdemandfromdensedevelopment,makingtheseareassusceptibletolocalizedgroundwaterproblems.AreasofpotentialimpactfromlargequantityandclusteredgroundwaterusersareshownonFigure2.8‐4.
Privateresidentialusersofgroundwaterareestimatedtohaveaconsumptiveuseofapproximately0.5acre‐feetperyearperresidence.However,therehavebeenisolatedreportsofsingle‐familyhomesthatusefargreaterquantities.Additionally,duetothelowstoragecapacityoffracturedrockaquifers,excessiveuseofgroundwaterbyasingleuserinafracturedrockaquifercancauselocalizedimpactsforneighboringproperties.
Inaddition,severalunincorporatedcommunitiesandareasweredevelopedwithlotsizessmallerthan4acres,whichhasresultedinclusteringofgroundwaterusersintheseareas.Theseareasarealsopotentiallysusceptibletolocalizedgroundwaterproblems,especiallyifunderlainbyfracturedrockaquiferswithlittletonoresiduumoralluvium.AsshownonFigure2.8‐4,thefollowingareashavebeenidentifiedashavingthehighestpotentialforlocalizedgroundwaterproblems(especiallyduringextendeddroughtperiods)fromtheexistingpumpageoflargeamountsofgroundwaterrelativetowhatthegivenaquifercansupport:BallenaValley(RamonaCPA),Guatay(Central
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐8
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
MountainSubregion),JulianTownCenter(JulianCPA),andMorenaVillage(MountainEmpireSubregion).
Borrego Valley (Desert Subregion)
BorregoValleyislocatedinthenortheastportionoftheunincorporatedCountyandisagroundwater‐dependentbasinwithoutanimportedwatersupply.TheBorregoValleyBasinholdsalargeamountofgroundwaterinstorage,estimatedtobeapproximately1.6millionacre‐feetofuseablegroundwater.Thebasinischaracterizedbylimitedrechargeduetoanannualrainfallofapproximately6inches.GroundwaterrechargefortheBorregoValleyisestimatedtoaverageapproximately5,000acre‐feetperyear.GroundwaterdemandintheValleyisinexcessof20,000acre‐feetperyear.
Groundwaterdemandhasincreasedoverthepast20yearsduetowaterusesfromover4,000acresofagriculturalland,golfcourses,andresidentialareas.Thishighgroundwaterdemandhasresultedinanoverdraftconditionwheregroundwaterextractionexceedslong‐termgroundwaterrecharge.Waterlevelshavebeendeclininginthebasinfordecadesasaresultoftheoverdraftcondition.Over500,000acre‐feetofgroundwaterhasbeenremovedfromtheaquiferoverthepast50years,andgroundwaterproductionatcurrentratesisnotsustainable.
WaterleveldeclinesinBorregoValleyaremostsignificantintheagriculturalareainthenorthernportionofthebasin,whichhasexperiencedover50feetofwaterleveldeclinesincetheCountybegancollectingwaterleveldatainthe1980s.Groundwaterhasbeenandiscontinuingtobeextractedatratesthatexceedrecharge,whichhascausedanapparentlong‐termoverdraftcondition,alsoknownasgroundwatermining.Inthepast20years,ratesofdeclinehaveincreasedsharply,likelyinresponsetonewdevelopmentandadditionalgroundwaterextraction.
TheU.S.GeologicSurvey(USGS)recentlyconcludedagroundwaterstudyofBorregoValley(USGS2015b)torefinethe1980sUSGSgroundwaterflowmodel,takingadvantageofcontemporaryflowmodelingtools.TheupdatedmodelwasusedasapredictivetooltoestimatetheamountoftimeleftbeforethegroundwatertabledropsbelowthepumpintakeinproductionwellscurrentlybeingusedinBorregoValley.Thestudyconcludedthatcontinuationofcurrent(2010)annualpumpagewouldresultintotaldepletioningroundwaterstorageofabout1,000,000acre‐feetby2060.Resultsoftheupdatedmodelsimulationsindicatethatsimulatedgroundwaterpumpageexceededrechargeinmostyears,resultinginanestimatedcumulativedepletioningroundwaterstorageofabout440,000acre‐feet.Groundwaterpumpingresultedinsimulatedgroundwaterlevelsdecliningbymorethan150feetrelativeto1945conditionsinpumpingareas.Inturn,thedeclineingroundwaterlevelshasresultedinthedecreaseinnaturaldischargefromthebasin.
Groundwater Quality Issues
Qualityissuesingroundwatermayrelatetotheamountofpotablesupplyavailableforuse.GroundwaterobtainedfromSanDiegoCountyaquifershastraditionallybeenveryhighquality.However,naturallyoccurringand,morerecently,human‐madesourcesofcontaminationhavecausedthequalityofgroundwatertobeadverselyaffectedinlocalizedareas.Themostcommonhuman‐madesourcesofgroundwatercontaminationareleakingundergroundfueltanks,sewerandsepticsystems,agriculturalapplications,andfacilitiesproducinganimalwastes.ThemostcommoncontaminantsingroundwaterwithintheCountyareelevatednitrate,naturallyoccurringradionuclides,totaldissolvedsolids(TDS),andbacteria(CountyofSanDiego2011).Groundwatercontaminantsofconcernthatmayresultfromagriculturaloperationsmayincludeherbicides,
Figure 2.8-4Large Quantity/Clustered Groundwater Uses
County of San Diego Agriculture Promotion Program
K:\Sa
n Dieg
o\proj
ects\
Coun
ty_of_
SanD
iego\0
0054
_15_
Ag_P
romoti
on\m
apdo
c\EIR
\Fig0
2_8_
4_Gr
ound
water
Uses
.mxd
Date
: 3/24
/2016
249
91
Source: County of San Diego General Plan Update, April 2010
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐9
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
pesticidesandothercomplexorganics,petroleumproductsincludingmethyltertiarybutyletherandvolatileorganiccompounds,andmetals.ThecommoncontaminantsandhowtheyrelatetogroundwaterintheCountyaredescribedbelow.
Nitrate
NitrateimpactsintheCountyaremostcommonfromsmallparcelsand/orareasofshallowgroundwateronsepticsystemsorexcessnitrateusedinagriculturalapplicationsandfeedlots.Potentialnitrateproblemareasincludeportionsofthefollowingcommunities:AlpinealongRoute8,CameronCornersinCampo,Crest,Escondido,Jamul,MorenaVillage,Rainbow,Ramona,SanMarcos,andValleyCenter(CountyofSanDiego2011).Otherregionalareasofpotentialconcernwithintheprojectareaareclusteredresidenceslocatedonparcelslessthan4acres.Iftheclusteredresidencesareonindividualsepticsystems,thesmallerparcelsizescouldresultinlocalizednitrateimpacts.Areasofhistoricintensiveagriculturalactivitiescouldalsohavelocalizednitrateimpacts.
Radionuclides
Naturallyoccurringradionuclides(atomswithunstablenucleiandwhichmayemitgammaraysorsubatomicparticlesduringtheprocessofdecay)arepresenttosomeextentinnearlyallrocksandsoilthroughouttheworldandleachintogroundwaterfromnaturalmineraldeposits.PotentialradionuclideproblemareasintheunincorporatedareasoftheCountyincludeportionsofthefollowingcommunities:Campo/LakeMorena,Cuyamaca/Julian,Guatay,Jamul/Dulzura,LakeWohlford,Potrero,Ramona(east),Route79(DodgeValley)neartheRiversideCountyborder,andWarnerSprings(CountyofSanDiego2011).
Total Dissolved Solids and Coliform Bacteria
TDSoriginatenaturallyfromthedissolutionofrocksandminerals,andalsocanresultfromsepticsystems,agriculturalrunoff,andstormwaterrunoff.Elevatedbacterialevelsingroundwateroccurprimarilyfromhumanandanimalwastes.Oldwellswithlargeopeningsandwellswithinadequatesealsaremostsusceptibletobacteriologicalcontaminationfrominsects,rodents,oranimalsenteringthewells.NeitherTDSnorcoliformbacteriaisthoughttooccuroverlargeareasoftheprojectareaatlevelsexceedingtheirrespectivemaximumcontaminantlevels(MCLs).However,localizedimpactsfromtheseconstituentsarepossible.
Groundwater‐Dependent Water Districts
The14groundwater‐dependentwaterdistrictslistedbelowservetheunincorporatedareasofSanDiegoCountywithouttheabilitytoreceiveimportedwaterdirectlyfromSDCWA.
BorregoSpringsParkCommunityServiceDistrict(BSPCSD)
JulianCommunityServicesDistrict(JulianCSD)
BorregoWaterDistrict(BWD) MajesticPinesCommunityServicesDistrict(MPCSD)
CampoWaterandSewerMaintenanceDistrict(CWSMD)
MootamaiMunicipalWaterDistrict(MMWD)
CanebrakeCountyWaterDistrict(CCWD) PaumaMunicipalWaterDistrict(PMWD)
CuyamacaWaterDistrict(CWD) QuesthavenMunicipalWaterDistrict(QMWD)
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐10
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
DescansoCommunityServicesDistrict(DCSD)
SanLuisReyMunicipalWaterDistrict(SLRMWD)
JacumbaCommunityServicesDistrict(JCSD)
WynolaWaterDistrict(WWD)
Eachofthesedistrictsreliesongroundwaterastheonlysourcefortheirwatersupply.TheyarenotrequiredtoproduceUWMPsbecausetheyeitherdonotserveover3,000customersordonotdistributeover3,000acre‐feetofwaterannually.However,theyarepublicagencieswithoversightbyelectedBoardsandtheStateofCalifornia.Thesedistrictscoverjustasmallfractionofthegroundwater‐dependenttotalarea.
Groundwater‐Dependent Users
Groundwater‐dependentproperties,ifnotservedbyawaterdistrictsuchasthoselistedabove,areeitherservedbyonsiteprivatewellsorbygroundwaterprovidedbyasmallorcommunitywatersystemsuchasasmallwatercompany.
Privatewellsaregenerallynotregulatedforthequantityofthewatertheypump.Propertyownersthatrelyontheirownwellsfortheirresidences,agriculture,andinsomecasescommercialusesareresponsibleforensuringadequatewatersupplyandappropriatewaterquality.
Smallandcommunitywatersystemswithupto199serviceconnectionsareregulatedbytheCountyofSanDiegoCountyDepartmentofEnvironmentalHealth(DEH),LandUseProgram.Asof2008,therewere174smallwatersystemsregulatedandmonitoredbyDEHtoensurecompliancewiththeCaliforniaSafeDrinkingWaterActforsupplyingpotablewater.Thereareanumberofwateruses(withwidelyrangingwaterdemand)associatedwiththesewatersystemsincludingcampgrounds,resorts,retreatcenters,schools,residences,restaurants,andparks.
Watersystemswith200ormoreserviceconnectionsareregulatedbytheCaliforniaDepartmentofPublicHealthDivisionofDrinkingWater&EnvironmentalManagement.WithintheSanDiegoregion,thisdepartmentregulatesthreecompanieswith200connectionsormoreatthestatelevel:thePineHills,PineValley,andRancho‐PaumaMutualWaterCompanies.Themajorityofthesearestate‐regulatedsystemsthatpurveygroundwatertoresidentialusers.
2.8.1.3 Agricultural Water Use
In1998,DWRconductedadetailedsurveyofirrigatedagriculturallandintheCounty,whichincludedreviewofaerialphotographyandextensivefieldvisitstocollectsite‐specificdata.Thesedatarepresentthemostdetailedinformationavailableatacountywidescaletoestimatewaterdemandfromagriculturaluses.Generalagriculturalusecategoriesincludegrazinganddrylandfarming,irrigationofpasturelandsandalfalfa,orchardsandvineyards(citrus,avocados,apples,grapes,etc.),andtruckcrops(seasonallyplantedcropssuchaslettuceortomatoes).SomeofthemainwaterintensiveagriculturalproductionareasarewithinPala/Pauma(citrus,avocados,nurserycrops,andcutflowers),Julian(apples),Jamul(citrusandavocados),eastofRamona(ranches/eggranch),andBorregoValley(citrusandpalms).
Wateruseforplantsvariesdependingonweatherfactorssuchasairtemperature,relativehumidity,windspeed,andsolarradiation;soilfactorssuchassoiltexture,structure,density,andchemistry;andplantfactorssuchasplanttype,rootdepth,foliardensity,height,andstageofgrowth.Water
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐11
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
demandcanrangefromlessthan1acre‐feetofwaterperacreperyearfordrylandfarmedareastoover4acre‐feetofwaterperacreperyearforirrigatedalfalfaandotherwater‐intensiveplanttypes(CountyofSanDiego2011).Incomparison,itisconservativelyestimatedthatanaverageresidencehasaconsumptiveuseofapproximately0.5acre‐feetofgroundwaterperyearpersingle‐familyresidence.
AlargepercentageoftheCounty’sagriculturallandisinvolvedintheactiveproductionofcitrusandavocadocrops,becausetheyaresuitedtogrowingonthesteepslopesthataresocommonintheCounty.Soiltextureandcapacityofsoiltoholdwater,slopeandsoilerosionpotential,drainagepotential,orhighwatertableareallfactorsthatwouldaffectthewateruseatindividualoperations.
AnimportantfactorinanyagriculturaloperationwithintheCountyofSanDiegoiscostduetorelianceonimportedwater.Limitedwatersupply,conservationincentives,importationcosts,andenergycostsarereasonsforhighwatercosts.ToillustrateandcomparewatercostsintheCountyofSanDiegowithnearbyfarmingcounties,thecostforimportedwateris$20peracrefootinImperialCountyand$379peracrefootinVenturaCounty,comparedto$594peracrefootintheCountyofSanDiego.Inaddition,whilemostfarmersintheCountyfacehighwatercosts,othersarefacedwithalimitedsupply.
InareassuchasBorregoSpringsandJulian,farmersrelyentirelyongroundwatersourcestoirrigatecrops.WaterscarcityisacontinuousproblemforfarmersinBorregoSpringsgiventhearidclimateoftheregionanditslocationoutsidetheboundaryoftheSDCWA.Also,importantly,groundwaterintheBorregoSpringsareaissubjecttoanannualdeclinewhererechargedoesnotreplaceextraction.
TheMWDUWMPnotesasignificantdeclineinagriculturalwateruseinrecentyearswithinitsservicearea.ThisdeclinewasduetomandatorysupplyallocationsthatresultedfromdroughtconditionsandjudicialrestrictionsonStateWaterProjectsupplyavailability.Startinginyear2008,memberagencycustomersthatwerevoluntarilyreceivingdiscountedagriculturalwater,wererequiredtoimplementa30percentcutbackinagriculturaldemandfromtheirfiscalyear2007baseline.Tocomplywiththemandatorycutback,growersimplementedvariousactionssuchastreestumpingandplantstockreduction.Asaresult,programagriculturaldemanddeclinedby55percentbetweenthefiscalyearsof2007and2010(SDCWA2011).
2.8.2 Regulatory Setting
Watersupplyandgroundwateraresubjecttoregulatoryoversightatthreelevels:federal,state,andlocal.
2.8.2.1 Federal Regulations
Safe Drinking Water Act
Passedin1974andamendedin1986and1996,theSafeDrinkingWaterAct(SDWA)givesthefederalEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)theauthoritytosetdrinkingwaterstandards.Drinkingwaterstandardsapplytopublicwatersystemsthatprovidewaterforhumanconsumptionthroughatleast15serviceconnections,orregularlyserveatleast25individuals.Therearetwocategoriesofdrinkingwaterstandards,theNationalPrimaryDrinkingWaterRegulationsandtheNationalSecondaryDrinkingWaterRegulations.Primaryregulationsarelegallyenforceablestandardsthatapplytopublicwatersystems,andprotectdrinkingwaterqualitybylimitingthelevelsofspecificcontaminantsthatcanadverselyaffectpublichealthandareknownoranticipated
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐12
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
tooccurinwater.Secondaryregulationsarerecommendationstogivepublicwatersystemsguidanceonremovingcontaminantstolevelsthatarebelownoticeablelevels,andarenotlegallyenforceable.Secondarycontaminantsarenothealththreatsandcanbegroupedintothreecategories:aesthetic,cosmetic,andtechnicaleffects.Aestheticeffectsareundesirabletastesorodors.Cosmeticeffectsdonotdamagethebodybutarestillundesirable.Technicaleffectsmaydamagewaterequipmentorreduceeffectivenessoftreatmentforothercontaminants(EPA2016).
2.8.2.2 State Regulations
California Environmental Quality Act and Case Law
CEQArequiresanEIRtodiscusswhetheraproject’sprojecteddemandforwaterisanticipatedtoexceedexistingandplannedsupplies.Regardingthistopic,theultimatequestionunderCEQAisnotwhetheranEIRidentifiesalikelysourceofwater,butwhetheritadequatelyaddressesthereasonablyforeseeableimpactsofsupplyingwatertotheproject.TheEIRmustalsodisclosewhetherthereisinsufficientwatertoservetheprojectedlevelofdevelopment.TheCaliforniaSupremeCourtstatedinVineyardAreaCitizensforResponsibleGrowthv.CityofRanchoCordova(2007)40Cal.4th412thatanadequatewatersupplyanalysisshouldcontainthefollowingelements.
Anidentificationofthewatersourcesneededforfullbuildout.
Anassessmentoftheenvironmentalimpactsassociatedwithprovidingwaterfortheproject.
Wheretherearebothshort‐termandlong‐termsuppliesneeded,ananalysisoflong‐termsuppliesandtheirimpactsinatleastaprogrammaticlevelofdetail.
Anassessmentoftheextenttowhichidentifiedwatersourcesare“certain”or“likely”tobeavailable.
When“someuncertainty”existswithrespecttotheavailabilityofsuchsupplies,theidentificationofpossiblealternativewatersourcesandanalysisoftheenvironmentalimpactsofcurtailingplanneddevelopmentduetoinadequatesupplies.
State Maximum Contaminant Levels
AspartoftheCaliforniaSafeDrinkingWaterAct,theStateDepartmentofHealthServices(DHS)setsprimaryandsecondarystandardsfordrinkingwatersupplies.MCLssetbyDHSareeitherasstringentormorestringentthanfederalMCLs.
Senate Bill x7‐7 (Chapter 4, Statutes of 2009)
SenateBill(SB)x7‐7,theWaterConservationActof2009,requiresthestatetoachievea20percentreductioninurbanpercapitawaterusebyDecember31,2020.Theresponsibilityforthisconservationfallstolocalwateragencies,whichmustincreasewateruseefficiencythroughpromotionofwaterconservationstandardsthatareconsistentwiththeCaliforniaUrbanWaterConservationCouncil’sbestmanagementpractices.EachurbanretailwatersupplierwasalsorequiredtodevelopurbanwaterusetargetsandaninterimurbanwaterusetargetbyJuly1,2011,basedonthealternativemethodssetoutinthe2009act.Theagenciesmustmeetthosetargetsbythe2020deadline.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐13
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
TheSDCWAissubjecttotherequirementofSBx7‐7andhasaddressedtheirwaterusetargetsintheirlatestUWMP.
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
OnSeptember16,2014,GovernorEdmundG.Brown,Jr.signedhistoriclegislationtostrengthenlocalmanagementandmonitoringofgroundwaterbasinsmostcriticaltothestate’swaterneeds.Thethreebills—SB1168(Pavley),SB1319(Pavley),andAssemblyBill(AB)1739(Dickinson)—togethercomprisetheSustainableGroundwaterManagementAct.Thebillswouldestablishphasedrequirementsforhigh‐andmedium‐prioritybasinstoadoptgroundwatersustainabilityplans,dependingonwhetherornotabasinisincriticaloverdraft.TheactwouldrequireadoptionofgroundwatersustainabilityplansbyJanuary31,2020,forallhighormedium‐prioritybasinsinoverdraftconditionandbyJanuary31,2022,forallotherhigh‐andmedium‐prioritybasinsunlesslegallyadjudicatedorotherwisemanagedsustainably.
Thesebillsaffectgroundwaterextractorsinhigh‐ormedium‐prioritybasinsandputrequirementsonlocalpublicagencieswithwatersupply,watermanagement,orlanduseresponsibilitiestoformGroundwaterSustainabilityAgenciesresponsibleforsustainablymanaginggroundwaterintheirrespectivebasin.WithintheSanDiegoregion,therearefournon‐adjudicated,medium‐prioritygroundwaterbasinssubjecttothisact:SanPasqualValley,SanDiegoRiverValley,BorregoValley,andSanLuisReyValley.Therearenohigh‐prioritygroundwaterbasinsintheregion.ItshouldbenotedthattheSDCWAdoesnotownoroperategroundwaterfacilitieswithinSanDiegoCounty.
Water Code (State)
Section10900etseq.oftheWaterCodeoutlinestheAgriculturalWaterSuppliersEfficientWaterManagementPractices.Theintentistoprovideassistanceandtechnicalconsultationtoaddressadditionalefficiencyinagriculturalwateruse.Keyprovisionsincludetheauthorizationofpublicagenciesthatsupplyagriculturalwatertoinitiatewaterconservationandefficiencyprograms.DWRisalsoauthorizedtoestablishtheAgriculturalWaterManagementCouncilandtoevaluatepotentialwaterefficientpractices.
Section10910etseq.requiresthatthewaterpurveyorofapublicwatersystemprepareawatersupplyassessmenttobeincludedintheenvironmentaldocumentationforcertainprojectssubjecttoCEQA,asspecifiedinWaterCodeSection10912.Theseprojectsinclude,amongothers,thosethatwoulddemandanamountofwaterequivalentto,orgreaterthan,thatofacommercialprojectemployingmorethan1,000personsorhavingmorethan250,000squarefeetoffloorspace,andaresidentialprojectwith500dwellingunits.Awatersupplyassessmentwouldalsoberequiredforaprojectthatwouldincreasethenumberofconnectionsby10percentforapublicwatersystemthathasfewerthan5,000serviceconnections(WaterCodeSection10912(b)).Wherelarge‐scaleprojectsareproposed,proofofasufficientsupplyofwaterisbasedonawrittenverificationfromtheapplicablewaterserviceprovider.
Urban Water Management Planning Act
ThestateUrbanWaterManagementPlanningActrequireswaterutilitiesthatprovidewatertomorethan3,000customersorsupplymorethan3,000acre‐feetperyeartoprepareandupdateanUWMPevery5years(WaterCodeSections10610–10656).TheseplansarepreparedaccordingtoguidelinesreleasedbyDWR.AUWMPisrequiredinorderforawatersuppliertobeeligibleforDWR‐administeredstategrants,loans,anddroughtassistance.AUWMPprovidesusefulinformation
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐14
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
onwaterdemand,watersupply,recycledwater,waterquality,reliabilityplanning,demandmanagementmeasures,bestmanagementpractices,andwatershortagecontingencyplanning.TheUWMPActrequirespreparationofaUWMPthatyieldsthefollowing.
1. Accomplisheswatersupplyplanningovera20‐yearperiodin5‐yearincrements.
2. Identifiesandquantifiesadequatewatersupplies,includingrecycledwater,forexistingandfuturedemands,innormal,single‐dryandmultiple‐dryyears.
3. Implementsconservationandefficientuseofurbanwatersupplies.
AgenciespreparingaUWMParerequiredtoincludeanurbanwatercontingencyanalysis.TheDepartmentofWaterResourcesalsooffersguidanceonthisanalysis(StateofCalifornia2008,2015).Someofthecomponentsofthecontingencyanalysisincludethefollowing.
Stagesofactionanagencywilltakeinresponsetowatershortages,includingachievablelevelsforvoluntaryandmandatoryrationingduringwatersupplyshortagestohelpcontrolconsumption.
Anestimateofsupplyfor3consecutivedryyears(quantifytheminimumwatersupplyavailableduringthenext3yearsbasedonthedriest3‐yearhistoricsequenceforthewatersupply).
Adescriptionofhowanagencywillmonitoranddocumentwatercutbacks.
DWR’sOfficeofWaterUseEfficiencyandTransfersalsopublishedaguidebookforlocalagenciestobebetterpreparedfordroughtconditions.Inthisguidebook,itwasreportedthateducationaleffortsandrationingpoliciesestablishedinwatershortagecontingencyplanscanaffectwaterusepatternsduringdryyears(StateofCalifornia2008).
TheUWMPprocessensuresthatwatersuppliesarebeingplannedtomeetfuturegrowth.UWMPsaredevelopedtomanagetheuncertaintiesandvariabilityofmultiplesupplysourcesanddemandsoverthelongtermthroughpreferredwaterresourcesstrategyadoptionandresourcedevelopmenttargetapprovalsforimplementation.WaterdistrictsupdatetheirdemandforecastsandsupplyneedsbasedonthemostrecentSanDiegoAssociationofGovernment(SANDAG)forecastapproximatelyevery5yearstocoincidewithpreparationoftheirUWMPs.
Porter‐Cologne Water Quality Control Act
ThePorter–CologneWaterQualityControlActprovidesforstatewidecoordinationofwaterqualityregulations.TheCaliforniaStateWaterResourcesControlBoardwasestablishedasthestatewideauthority,andnineseparateRegionalWaterQualityControlBoardsweredevelopedtooverseewaterqualityonaday‐to‐daybasis,whichaffectsregionalwatersupplyandgroundwater.
2.8.2.3 Local Regulations
Water Shortage and Drought Response Plan
TheSDCWAanditsmemberagenciesdevelopedandapprovedtheDroughtManagementPlaninMay2006.ThisdocumentwaslaterrenamedtheWaterShortageandDroughtResponsePlanandwasupdatedinApril2012withthereplacementofSection5–SupplyAllocationMethodology.TheprimarypurposeofthedocumentistoprovideSDCWAanditsmemberagencieswithaseriesofpotentialactionstotakewhenfacedwithashortageofimportedwatersuppliesfromMWDduetodroughtconditions.Theactionswillhelptheregionminimizetheimpactsofshortagesandensure
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐15
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
anequitableallocationofsupplies.Differentfromatreatedwatershortageallocationplan,theDMPfocusesonissuesassociatedwithshortagesduetosupplycutbacks,notshortagesduetofacilityconstraints.
San Diego County Groundwater Ordinance
TheCountyofSanDiegocurrentlymanagesanticipatedfuturegroundwaterdemandthroughCountyCodeSection67.701etseq.(GroundwaterOrdinance).Thisordinancedoesnotlimitthenumberofwellsortheamountofgroundwaterextractionfromexistinglandowners.However,itdoesidentifyspecificmeasurestomitigatepotentialgroundwaterimpactsofprojectsrequiringspecifieddiscretionarypermits.ExistinglandusesarenotsubjecttotheGroundwaterOrdinanceunlessalisteddiscretionarypermitisrequired.Additionally,MajorUsePermitsorMajorUsePermitModificationsthatinvolveconstructionofagriculturalandranchsupportfacilitiesorthoseinvolvingneworexpandedagriculturallandusesareamongtheexemptionsfromtheGroundwaterOrdinance.However,theagriculturalexemptionsdonotsupersedeorlimittheapplicationofanylaworregulation,includingCEQA.
County Code of Regulations related to Groundwater Well Water Quality
Section67.401oftheCountyCodeofRegulationsprovidesrestrictionsandregulationsforwells.Thestandardsinthecodeapplytotheconstructionandmaintenanceofwellstoensurethatgroundwaterwillnotbepollutedorcontaminated.PrivatedrinkingwaterwellsrequireapermitfromCountyDEH.Aspartofthisprocess,newwellsaresampledforbacteriologicalconstituentsandnitrate.
Forprojectswithpoorgroundwaterquality,twomitigationmeasureshavebeenidentifiedbytheCountyinadditiontoimportingwatertotheprojectsite.ThefirststatesthatforprojectswhereanyconstituentexceedsitsprimaryMCLandadiscretionarypermitrequiresapotablegroundwatersupply,mitigationcouldbeimplementedbyprovidingawatertreatmentsystemthatreducesimpactstobelowtheMCL.ToensureproperwatertreatmentinaccordancewiththeCaliforniaSafeDrinkingWaterAct,theCountyrequiresdiscretionarypermitsthatrequiretreatmenttoformormergewithawatersystemregulatedbytheDEH(upto200serviceconnections)orthestate(greaterthan200serviceconnections).Thisensurespropertreatmentofconstituentsanddoesnotplacetheresponsibilityoftreatmentonprivateindividuals.AlthoughtheCountywillallowpoint‐of‐useorpoint‐of‐entrytreatmentforcontaminantsinwellsonexistinglegallots,itwillnotapprovediscretionarypermitsforprivatewellsdependentonwatertreatment.Thesecondmitigationmeasurestatesthatadditionalwellsandtestingcanbeconductedinanattempttofindonsitepotablewater.Drillingandtestingadditionalwellsisexpensiveandtime‐consuming,andtherearenoguaranteesthatthenewwell(s)willhaveapotablewatersupply(CountyofSanDiego2011).
2.8.3 Analysis of Project Effects and Determination of Significance
TheproposedprojectconsistsofanamendmenttotheZoningOrdinancerelatedtoaccessoryagriculturalusesinunincorporatedportionsoftheCountyoverwhichtheCountyhaslandusejurisdictions(seeSection1.4,ProjectDescription,forfurtherdetails).Specifically,theproposedprojectappliestopropertieswhereactiveagricultureexistswithintheCountyorpropertieswhereagriculturalusesareallowed.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐16
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
2.8.3.1 Water Supply
Guidelines for the Determination of Significance
ThefollowingsignificanceguidelinefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesappliestoboththedirectandcumulativeimpactanalyses.Asignificantimpactwouldresultif:
Sufficientwatersuppliesarenotavailabletoservetheprojectfromexistingentitlementsandresources,andneworexpandedentitlementsareneeded.
Analysis
Thisdiscussionappliestoneworexpandedentitlementsfromfutureagriculturaloperationsthatwouldrelyonwaterservicesfromawaterdistrictwithimportedwater.FutureprojectsthatwouldrelyongroundwaterareanalyzedseparatelyunderSection2.8.3.2,GroundwaterSupply.
Somefutureagriculturaloperationsmayalreadyhavewaterservicefromawaterdistrict,whileothersmayneedtomakeanewconnectionorchangetheirstatustoaccommodatetheaccessoryuses.Ataminimum,usesthatrequireanewconnectionfromawaterdistrictmustreceiveapprovalbythedistrict,whichwouldincludeanevaluationoftheirabilitytoservetheproperty.UsessubjecttodiscretionaryapprovalbytheCountywillrequireaWillServeletterbythedistrictatthetimetheprojectisbeingevaluatedbytheCounty.
Undertheproposedordinance,mostaccessoryusesoperatingby‐rightwouldberestrictedtospecificlimitationsasdefinedundertheproposedzoningamendmentsbutotherwisemaynotrequireevaluationbytheCounty.Forexample,themaximumfloorareaforanagriculturalroadsidestandis300squarefeet.Agriculturalstorescouldincludeindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvinglandclearingtosupportupto1,500squarefeetforsmallagriculturalstoresandupto3,000squarefeetforlargeagriculturalstores.
Adiscretionarypermitmaybetriggeredbythelargeraccessoryagriculturaluses,suchasagriculturalmicrobreweries/cideries/micro‐distilleries,wineries,andagriculturalstores,whichcouldrequireenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA.ForsmallerprojectsprocessedbytheCounty,theCEQAevaluationwouldtypicallyrelyontheWillServelettersfromtheappropriatewaterdistrict,theirexistingUWMP,andanyadditionalcommentsprovidedbythedistrict.Large‐scaleprojects,suchasthosewithmorethan250,000squarefeetoffloorspaceorwithwaterdemandsequivalentto500residentialunits,wouldbesubjecttothewatersupplyassessmentrequirementscontainedinSections10910–10914oftheStateWaterCodetodeterminewhethersufficientwatersupplyisavailabletomeetexpectedprojectdemand.However,agriculturaloperationsdescribedundertheproposedprojectwouldnotbeofasizeandscalethatwouldbeaffectedbythesewatersupplyassessmentrequirements.
AlthoughsomeoftheproposedaccessoryagriculturalusescouldundergofutureenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA,compliancewithCEQAdoesnotguaranteethatanyidentifiedpotentialimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.Itdoes,however,requirethatsignificantimpactsbeidentified,feasiblemitigationmeasuresbeimplemented,and,ifsignificantimpactsremainaftermitigation,thattheprojectonlybeapprovediftherearenofeasiblealternativestoreduceimpactsandthereareoverridingconsiderationstojustifyapproval.
Theproposedprojectwouldencourageactivitiesthatmayresultintheexpansionofagricultureonagriculturallyzonedlands.Usingaworst‐casescenarioforamicrobreweryasanexample,
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐17
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
amaximumof8,000barrelsallowedforlargeoperationswouldrequirebetween5.2and7.2acre‐feet1ofwaterperyear.Largeoperationswithatleast2acresofhops,barley,orothergrainproducedandusedonsitewouldrequireaminimumof4.2acre‐feetperyearforagriculturalproduction.Themainwaterusewouldinvolvegrowinghops,cleaningfloorsandotherareasthroughoutthebrewery,andcleaningequipment.Forfutureprojectsthatmayinvolveincreasedretailuseandassociatedactivity,ormayrequirenewwaterconnections,additionalwatersuppliescouldbeneededfornon‐productionuses,suchastoiletsandsinks,toaccommodateagricultureaccessoryuses.
SDCWAisthesupplierofwaterfortheSanDiegoregionandtheindividualwateragenciesthathaveaportionoftheirserviceareawithintheprojectarea.SDCWA,likeotherwaterdistricts,reliesonthepopulationprojectionsandanalysisconductedbylocalandregionallanduseagenciestodevelopinformationforwaterdemand.Intheir2010UWMP,SDCWAestimatedthatbetween2015and2035,thepercentageofwaterusedforagricultureintheCountywilldecrease,whilethepercentageforcommercial,industrial,andresidentialusewillincrease(SDCWA2011).The2010UWMPalsoidentifiesacontingencyanalysisbasedoncurrentconditions,includingchangestosupplyestimatesbasedonthedriest3‐yearhistoricsequenceandprojectedwaterusebasedonlandusecharacteristics.BecausetheproposedprojectisanextensionofagriculturalusesinA70,A72,S88,S90,andS92zones,expansionofagriculturaloperationstoallowforaccessoryuseswouldnotchangethegrowthprojectionsordemandforresourcesonwhichwatersupplyandavailabilityaremeasuredintheUWMPfortheSDCWA.
Whiletheproposedprojectisnotexpectedtochangedemandprojections,accessoryagriculturalusesthatarepromotedbytheproposedprojectcouldresultinactualincreasesinwaterdemandfromagriculturaltourism,agriculturalhomestays,agriculturalandhorticulturalretailuses,agriculturalmicrobreweries/cideries/micro‐distilleries,wineries,animalraising,aquaponicsandfishmarkets,creamery/dairies,andmobilebutchering(discussedindividuallybelowunderAccessoryAgricultureUseWaterDemands),TheURMPpreparedbytheSDCWAanditsmemberagenciescoversthenext20yearsforwateruseintheCountyandanticipateschangesindemandandcircumstancesthatwillaffectsupplies.However,uncertaintyremains.Becausetheproposedprojectwillresultinincreasedwaterdemandonsomeproperties,itwouldcontributetotheuncertaintyoftheseplans.Additionally,theproposedprojectrepresentsapolicychangethathasnoterminationdate.Therefore,itseffectswouldextendbeyondthe20‐yearplanninghorizoncoveredbytheUWMPs.Asaresult,theeffectonindividualwateragenciescannotbedetermined,buttheprojectcouldcontributetotheneedtoidentifyadditionalwatersupplies.
Accessory Agriculture Use Water Demands
Agriculturaltourismwaterusewouldbelargelyforbathroomfixturesandwoulddependonthenumberofvisitorsandthelengthofstay.Waterusewouldrequireaminimumof0.003to0.26acre‐feetperyearfornon‐productionuses,suchastoiletsandsinks.2Waterusecouldalsoincludecleaning,potabledrinking,andotheruses.Theactualamountofwaterrequiredwouldvarydependingonthesizeandfrequencyofevents,thewateruseinvolved,andthenumberofvisitors.Existingagriculturaltourismoperationsaccommodatearangeof10–1,000visitorsperweek,
1Usinga5‐7water:1beerratiobasedonpersonalcommunicationswithTimSuydam,SeniorWaterOperationsManageratStoneBrewingCo.Fluctuationsinwaterdemanddependonbeertypeandhopsused.2Standardtoiletsuse1.6gallonsofwaterperflush.Assumingeachvisitorusesthebathroomoncepervisit,10visitorsperweekwouldrequire0.003to0.26acre‐feetperyear.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐18
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
dependingontheoperationsize,andeventtypeandfrequency.Standardtoiletsuse1.6gallonsperflush,whileoldertoiletscanuseasmuchas3.5to7gallonsperflush(EPA2015).
Agriculturalhomestaysrequireabout0.5acre‐feetperyear3foramaximumofthreerentedbedrooms(WaterBoards2015).Thelocationandnumberofrentedbedroomsavailablearenotknownatthistime,andimpactswouldvarydependingonthespecificsite.Agriculturalhomestayswouldbeallowedwithaministerialpermit(e.g.,ZoningVerificationPermit)ratherthanadiscretionarypermit,subjecttocertaincriteria.Operatorsofanagriculturalhomestaythatwouldutilizeuptothreeroomswithinanexistingresidenceonthepropertymaynotneedtoconstructanewstructureandwouldavoidadditionalconnections.However,watersupplyimpactscouldresultifanewresidence(onavacantlot)oradetachedcabinrequiresnewconnections.Increasesinwaterdemandfromadditionalhouseholdusesrelatedtonewvisitorscouldalsoresultinwatersupplyimpacts.
TheprojectalsoproposesagriculturalandhorticulturalretailuseswithinA70,A72,S88,S90,S92,andRRzones,includingagriculturalstandsandagriculturalstores(bothsmallandlarge).Roadsidesaleswouldinvolveminimalwateruseforemployeedrinkingandsanitation,asroadsidestandsarelimitedto300squarefeetinsizeandwouldnotincludeproductionuses.Retailoperationswithproductionusesgenerallywatertheirproductstwiceaday,onceinthemorningandoncetowardstheendoftheday.Forexample,onelocalagriculturalandhorticulturalretailoperationestimatesthattheirwaterusetotaled0.0002acre‐feetperacrepermonth4(Owenspers.com.2015).Usingthisratio,cropirrigationmayrequire0.0026acre‐feetperyearperacre.Applyingthisestimatedratio,smallagriculturalstoreswouldrequireaminimumof0.0013acre‐feetofwaterperyearandlargeagriculturalstoreswouldrequireaminimumof0.0026acre‐feetofwaterperyear.Forlargeagriculturalstores,someoftheindoorspacewouldsupportfoodpreparationandindoorseatingareasforpatrons.Smallagriculturalstoreswouldnotincludefoodservicespace.Visitorandgeneralactivitywouldincreaseonpropertiesthatdevelop,andagriculturalstandsorstorescouldincreasewaterdemandfromtheretailuseandassociatedactivity.
Implementationoftheproposedagriculturalmicrobrewery,cidery,andmicro‐distilleryusescouldincludeindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvingbetween5.2and7.2acre‐feetofwatertoproducethemaximumamountof8,000barrelsperyearforlargeoperations.Waterdemandfortastingroomsisestimatedtorequireamaximumof0.45acre‐feetperyearforlotslargerthan4acres.5Largeoperationswithatleast2acresofhopsproducedandusedonsitewouldrequireaminimumof4.2acre‐feetperyearforagriculturalproduction.Thus,anestimatedtotalbetween9.4and11.4acre‐feetperyearofwaterwouldberequiredtooperatealargemicrobrewery.Withinabrewery,therearefourmainareaswherewaterisused:brewhouse,cellars,packaging,andutilities.Inaddition,ancillaryoperationssuchasfoodserviceandrestroomscontributetowaterusage(BrewersAssociation2014).
Wineriescoulduseupto1.5acre‐feetofwaterperyearperacre(CountyofSanDiego2010).TheproposedprojectwouldextendPackingandProcessing:SmallWinery,PackingandProcessing:
3AverageresidentialpercapitawaterusageinCaliforniais76.7gallonsperpersonperday.Assumingaconservativeestimateoftwopersonsperrentedbedroom,atotalof6personswouldrequire0.515acre‐feetofwaterperyear.4FrompersonalcommunicationwithKalimOwensfromWeidner’sGarden.Waterdemandatoneoftheirfacilitiestotaled847gallonsfora6‐acrefarmover2months.5The2006LosAngelesCEQAThresholdsdefinecommercialwaterdemandstobe80gallonsperdayper1,000grosssquarefeet.Thisconservativeratiowasusedtocalculatewaterdemandsforeachlotsizecategory.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐19
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
BoutiqueWinery,andPackingandProcessing:WholesaleLimitedWineryusesasallowedby‐rightintheS92zoneasanagriculturalusetype.Basedontheestimatethat6–10gallonsofwaterareusedforeverygallonofwineproduced,awineryproducing0.037acre‐feetofwineperyearcoulduseanadditional0.22–0.37acre‐feetofwaterperyearforwineproduction(CountyofSanDiego2010).Themainwaterusewithinawineryitselfisforwashingdownfloorsandareasthroughoutthewinery;cleaningequipmentincludingthereceivinglines,thepresses,thetanks,andthebottlinglines;andwashingthebarrelsorotherstoragecontainersatvariousstagesofthewinemakingprocess.
Watercanalsobeusedasafrostpreventativebygrowersnearriversorinavalley.ExistingwineryoperatorsinSanDiegoCountyhaveindicatedthattheyarenotusingwaterasafrostpreventativeeitherbecauseitisnotnecessaryoritisnoteffectiveinhigherelevationsandslopedareas(CountyofSanDiego2010).Forwineriesthatwouldoperateby‐right,additionalwatersupplieswouldbeneededfornon‐productionusesatthewinery,suchasfortoiletsandsinks,toaccommodatethetastingroomcomponent.AlthoughvineyardsgenerallyrequirelesswaterthanmanyothercropsgrownwithintheCounty,irrigationrequirementsforfuturewineriesthatmaybeallowedbytheproposedzoningordinanceamendmentarenotyetknown.
TheproposedprojectwouldamendthecurrentanimalscheduletoallowcertainanimalraisingprojectsunderalessrestrictiveAdministrativePermit.Assuch,itislikelythatthroughlessrestrictivepermittingrequirementsallowingonsiteanimals,theproposedprojectcouldcauseanincreaseinwaterdemand.Waterdemandscanrangefrom5–10gallonsperdayperheadforsmalleranimalssuchaschickens,ducks,rabbits,pigs,andgoats(Axepers.comm.).Waterdemandsforlargeranimalssuchascowscouldaverage49gallons(0.00015acre‐feet6)perheadperday(VanOmmeringpers.comm.).
Aquaponicswouldrequireminimalamountsofwaterforinitialdrawingtofilltheaquaponicssystemsandforroutinemaintenance.Theamountofwaterrequiredwoulddependonthenumberoffishandthesizeofthesystems.Anoperationwith900fishwouldrequireapproximately18,000gallons(0.055acre‐feet)ofwaterperyear(Gorhampers.comm.).Fishermen’smarketsinvolvetheretailsaleoffishtothegeneralpublicandwouldbeallowedonatemporarybasis,similartofarmers’markets,ondevelopedpublicpropertyzonedforcommercialuse,schoolproperty,orinconjunctionwithafarmers’market.Theretailareaitselfwouldlikelyconsistofashadetentorstructureandoutdoortablesandwouldnotrequirepermanentstructuresorothersiteimprovements.Itisnotanticipatedthatfishmarketswouldrequirenewconnectionstowater,asoperationswouldtakeplaceonexistingdevelopedsites.
Creamery/dairyoperationscouldpotentiallyrequireawateruseof78.4acre‐feet7forapermittedherdsizeof1,400head,suchastheVanOmmeringDairyFarm(VanOmmeringpers.comm.).Creamery/dairyuseswouldrequirethedevelopmentofnon‐residentialstructurestosupporttheproductionofbutter,cream,milk,orcheesewithinanenclosedbuilding,andwouldalsorequireindoorspaceforproductstorageintendedforwholesaleandretailsales.Implementationoftheproposedcreamery/dairyusesmightrequireindividualdevelopmentprojectsinvolvingnewconnectionstosupportuptoa4,000‐square‐footbuildingandassociatedincreasesinsiteactivityrelatedtoadditionalvisitorsandnewemployees.Duetohighwatercostsandrelatedoperationalcosts,dairyoperationsinSanDiegoCountyarenotexpectedtoincreasesignificantlyinnumber,and
61acre‐footconvertstoapproximately325,851gallons.7BasedonpersonalcommunicationswithRobVanOmmering,eachheadrequires50gallonsofwaterperday.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐20
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
waterusewouldbelimitedtoafewlocaloperations.However,thespecificamountofwaterrequiredandlocationoffutureprojectsareunknownandthusmaybeinareaswithlowwatersupply.
Waterformobilebutcheringwouldberequiredforpre‐processsanitationandafter‐processcleaning.Wateruseduringtheprocessingwouldbeminimalandisestimatedtobe32gallonsperhead(MobileMeatProcessing2015).Theactualamountofwaterrequiredwouldvarydependingonthesizeandnumberofanimalsbutchered.Theoperatingcapacityofamobilebutcheringoperationwouldbesignificantlysmallerthanatypicalbutcheringoperation,andwouldinvolveamotorvehicleand/ortrailertravellingtoagriculturalpropertieswithexistingwaterconnections.
Fordevelopmentofnewagriculturaloperationsorexpansionofexistingagriculturaloperationsonlandsnotcurrentlyirrigated,thereisapotentialtoincreasedemandforwater.AsdiscussedinSection1.4,ProjectDescription,someoftheproposedaccessoryagriculturalusesmaybepermittedwithaministerialpermitorby‐right,andmaynotrequireadditionalorsubsequentenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA.Evenforusesthatwouldrequireaministerialpermit,futureprojectsmayrequireapprovalfromtheappropriatewaterdistrictifsubstantialchangesinexistingwaterdemandareinvolved.DiscretionaryprojectsmayrequireWillServelettersfromtheappropriatewaterdistrict,andadditionalenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQAcouldberequired.Nevertheless,asdiscussedinthissection,
Withrespecttoimportedwatersupplies,theproposedprojectcouldresultinsignificantimpacts.Also,thelocationandnumberofneworexpandedwaterserviceconnectionsthatcouldberequiredfromaccessoryagriculturalusesoperatingby‐rightundertheamendedZoningOrdinancearenotknownandcouldresultinademandforwaterwherecurrentlynoneexists(ImpactWS‐1).
Environmental Impact from Expanding Water Supplies
Toevaluatethepotentialimpactsofthemethodsthatmaybeusedtoobtainadditionalwatersupply,thisdocumentherebyincorporatesbyreferencetheFinalSupplementalEIRfortheSDCWARegionalWaterFacilitiesMasterPlandatedMarch2013(SCHNo.2003021052).ThisdocumentcanbefoundonSDCWA’swebsiteatwww.sdcwa.organdissummarizedhereasfollows.
TheEIRfortheSDCWARegionalWaterFacilitiesMasterPlanevaluatesaprogramofwatersupplyprojects.TheMasterPlandoesnotdescribeeveryproposedfacilityindetail,butdescribesthetypesoffacilitiesneededtomeettheregion’sfuturewaterneeds.
TheEIRfortheSDCWARegionalWaterFacilitiesMasterPlandeterminedthatmultipleenvironmentalimpactsassociatedwiththeconstructionofwatersupplyprojectswouldpotentiallyoccur.
Ofallofthepotentialmethodstoensureadditionalwatersupply,waterconservationistheonlyapproachthatwouldnotresultinadverseenvironmentalimpacts.
Otherwatersupplyprojects,includingdesalinationprojects,theconveyanceofsuppliesfromthenorth,east,orwest,orincreasinglocalsupplyaboveplannedyieldhavethepotentialtoresultinsignificantenvironmentalimpacts.
Potentiallysignificantenvironmentalimpactsassociatedwiththefollowingenvironmentalissuesmayoccur:landuse,waterresources,biologicalresources,transportationandtraffic,noise,airquality,utilitiesandpublicservices,aesthetics,geologyandsoils,culturalresources,
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐21
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
publicsafetyandhazardousmaterials,paleontologicalresources,agriculturalresources,andrecreation.
2.8.3.2 Groundwater Supply
Guidelines for the Determination of Significance
ThefollowingguidelinesarefromAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelinesandareintendedtoprotectgroundwatersupplies.Asignificantimpactwouldresultif:
Sufficientwatersuppliesarenotavailabletoservetheprojectfromexistingentitlementsandresources,andneworexpandedentitlementsareneeded.
Theprojectwouldsubstantiallydepletegroundwatersuppliesorinterferesubstantiallywithgroundwaterrechargesuchthattherewouldbeanetdeficitinaquifervolumeoraloweringofthelocalgroundwatertablelevel.
Analysis
Approximately35percentoftheprojectarealieswithintheSDCWAboundaryandwouldbeabletoobtainawatersupplyfromoneofthewaterdistrictsthatdistributeswaterfromsurfacereservoirsorotherimportedwatersourcessubjecttoexistingagreementswithprovidersandwouldnothavetorelyupongroundwatersupplies.Somepropertieswithinthisareamayalsohaveanonsitewellanduseacombinationofimportedwaterandgroundwater.FortheseareaswithintheSDCWAboundary,wateravailabilitywouldbesubjecttoagriculturalagreementsalreadyinplace.Largeraccessoryagriculturaluses,suchasagriculturalmicrobreweries,wineries,andagriculturalstoreswouldundergofutureenvironmentalreviewpursuanttotherequirementtoobtainadiscretionarypermit.FuturediscretionaryprojectswouldrequireWillServelettersfromtheappropriatewaterdistrict,andmayrequirepaymentofconnectionfees.
Conversely,approximately65percentoftheprojectarealiesoutsideoftheSDCWAboundaryandreliesongroundwater.BecauseoneoftheobjectivesoftheproposedordinanceamendmentistoencouragethegrowthofthelocalagricultureindustryintheCountyandbecausealargeportionoftheprojectareaisgroundwaterdependent,anincreaseinthenumberofagriculturaloperationsingroundwater‐dependentareasmaycauseincreaseddemandforgroundwatersupplies.Groundwaterdemandwouldvarywiththeoperationalspecificsoftheproposedagriculturaluse.
Theproposedprojectcouldinvolvetheexpansionofagricultureonagriculturallyzonedlands.Generalinformationonwaterdemandsonthevariousagriculturalaccessoryusespromotedisprovidedinthepriorsection.Ofallproposeduses,microbreweriesareonaveragethemostwaterintensive.Basedontheworst‐caseestimate,aminimumof1.3acre‐feetofwaterwouldberequiredtoproducethemaximumamountof2,000barrelsperyearforsmallmicrobreweryoperationsandbetween5.2and7.2acre‐feetofwaterwouldberequiredtoproducethemaximumamountof8,000barrelsperyearforlargemicrobreweryoperations.Operationswithatleast2acresofhops,barley,orothergrainproducedandusedonsitewouldrequireaminimumof4.2acre‐feetperyearforagriculturalproduction.Themainwaterusewouldinvolvegrowinghops,cleaningfloorsandareasthroughouttheoperations,andcleaningequipment.
DiscretionaryprojectssubjecttotheGroundwaterOrdinancemayrequiredetailedevaluationtoaddresspotentialgroundwaterimpacts.Priortoapprovalofcertaindiscretionaryapplicationsforfutureprojectsthatproposetousegroundwater(listedinSection67.711andnotsubjecttoSections
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐22
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
67.720,67.721orParagraphAoftheGroundwaterOrdinance),aGroundwaterInvestigationisrequired.AsspecifiedintheGroundwaterOrdinance,theapplicationwillnotbeapprovedunlesstheapprovingauthorityfinds,basedupontheGroundwaterInvestigationorotheravailableinformation,either:(1)forawaterintensiveuse,thatgroundwaterresourcesareadequatetomeetthegroundwaterdemandsbothoftheprojectandthegroundwaterbasinifthebasinweredevelopedtothemaximumdensityandintensitypermittedbytheGeneralPlan;or(2)forallotherprojects,thatgroundwaterresourcesareadequatetomeetthegroundwaterdemandsoftheproject.MajorUsePermitsorMajorUsePermitModificationsthatinvolveconstructionofagriculturalandranchsupportfacilitiesorthoseinvolvingneworexpandedagriculturallandusesareamongtheexemptionsfromtheGroundwaterOrdinance.However,thisexemptiondoesnotsupersedeorlimittheapplicationofCEQA.Therefore,forsomecomponentsoftheproposedproject,suchasthoseproposingtousegroundwaterinanamountthatmayposeissuestotheaquiferorneighboringwells,subsequentenvironmentalreviewisanticipated,asaresultoftheGroundwaterOrdinanceand/orCEQA.
However,thecomponentsthatdonotrequirediscretionaryreviewbytheCounty,suchassmallerstructuresormoreconfinedusesthatdonotneedamajorgradingpermit,AdministrativePermit,orotherusepermit,areunlikelytorequiresubsequentanalysis.Theusesmayrelyonexistingwellsormayneedtodrilladditionalwellstosupportincreasedonsitedemands.Thesesituationscouldoccurinareaswheregroundwatersuppliesarelimitedand/oryieldsofgroundwaterarelow.Additionally,thenumber,location,andintensityofaccessoryagriculturalusesthatarepromotedbytheprojectarenotknown.Consequently,withrespecttogroundwatersupplies,impactswouldbesignificant(ImpactWS‐2).
Forproposedaccessoryagriculturalusesthatwouldnotrequirefurtherenvironmentalreview,increasesinbuildingandparkingareas,driveways,fences,oroutdoorseatingcouldoccurassociatedwithagriculturalhomestays,agriculturalmicrobreweries/cideries/micro‐distilleries,agriculturalandhorticulturalretailuses,agriculturaltourism,animalraising,aquaponics,creamery/dairy,mobilebutchering,andwineries,whichcouldpotentiallyincreasethedemandforgroundwatersupplies.However,theproposedordinanceincludeslanguagelimitingthesquarefootageofrelatedoperationstructures,andtheamountofimpervioussurfaceareaswouldberestrictedtothoselimits.Adiscretionarygradingpermitmaybetriggeredbythelargeraccessoryagriculturaluses,suchasagriculturalmicrobreweries/cideries/micro‐distilleries,wineries,andagriculturalstores,whichwouldrequireenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQA.Thus,newagriculturaloperationswouldnotinvolveoperationsthatwouldinterferesubstantiallywithgroundwaterrecharge.Furthermore,theaccessoryagriculturalusesdescribedundertheproposedprojectwouldnotinvolveregionaldiversionofwatertoanothergroundwaterbasin,ordiversionorchannelizationofastreamcourseorwaterwaywithimperviouslayers,suchasconcreteliningorculverts,forsubstantialdistances(e.g.,0.25mile).Therefore,noimpactongroundwaterrechargeisanticipated.
2.8.4 Cumulative Impacts Analysis
Thegeographicscopeofthecumulativeimpactanalysisforwatersupplyisdefinedbythedistrictsandagenciesthatdevelopandrelyonvarioussupplysourcesforimportedwatersupply.Forgroundwater‐dependentareas,itisdefinedbythelimitsoftheaquifersthatsupporttheSanDiegoCountybackcountry.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐23
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
2.8.4.1 Water Supply
In2010,MWDadopteditscurrentRegionalUrbanWaterManagementPlan.MWD'sreliabilityassessmentshowedthatMWDcanmaintainreliablewatersuppliestomeetprojecteddemandthrough2035.MWDidentifiedbuffersupplies,includingotherStateWaterProjectgroundwaterstorageandtransfersthatcouldservetosupplyadditionalwaterneeds.MWDalsohasanIntegratedResourcePlanthatoutlinesastrategytoincreasewatersuppliesandlowerdemands.Theplanhasthreecomponentsthatbeginwithbaselineefforts—or,thecoreresourcestrategy—designedtomaintainreliablewatersupplies.Thesecondcomponent—theuncertaintybuffer—activatesasuiteofbufferactionsthathelptomitigateshort‐termchanges.Ifchangedconditionsturndramaticandpersistent,thereisafinalcomponent—foundationalactions—whichdetailsstrategiesforsecuringadditionalwaterresources.
MWDsupplieswatertowholesalersincludingtheSDCWA.WatersuppliesfortheCountyofSanDiegowithintheSDCWAboundariesareprovidedmainlybySDCWAtoitsmemberagencies.Inordertoprojectandplanforfuturewaterneeds,SDCWAhasenteredintoaMemorandumofAgreementwithSANDAGtousethemostrecentregionalgrowthforecastfordevelopingtheUWMPandRegionalWaterFacilitiesMasterPlan(RWFMP).BecausetheinformationintheUWMPisbasedonregionalgrowthforecastsbySANDAG,thebasisofthoseforecastsiscriticaltosupplyanddemandprojections.SANDAGprojectsgrowthbasedinpartonlocalgeneralplans.Totheextentthatdevelopmentoccursinaccordancewiththegeneralplansusedtopreparethegrowthforecasts,futurewatersupplyanddemandfortheunderlyinglandusedesignationsinthegeneralplansareaddressedbytheSDCWA’sUWMPandRWFMP.
TheproposedprojectdoesnotamendtheCountyofSanDiego’sGeneralPlan,asitrelatestogrowthprojections.Further,itdoesnotalterthegrowthprojectionsusedbySDCWAand,therefore,conformstotheassumptionsusedintheUWMPandRWFMP.TheproposedprojectisanextensionofagriculturalusesinA70,A72,S88,S90,andS92zones.ThestreamliningofregulationsforagriculturalventureswouldnotchangetheunderlyinglandusedesignationsuponwhichwatersupplyandavailabilityareprojectedintheUWMP.
Someoftheproposedaccessoryagriculturalusesmaybepermittedwithaministerialpermitorby‐right,andmaynotrequireadditionalorsubsequentenvironmentalreviewperCEQA.Evenforusesthatwouldrequireaministerialpermit,futureprojectsmayrequireapprovalfromtheappropriatewaterdistrictifsubstantialchangesinexistingwaterdemandareinvolved.DiscretionaryprojectsmayrequireWillServelettersfromtheappropriatewaterdistricts,andadditionalenvironmentalreviewpursuanttoCEQAwouldberequired.AlthoughallfutureprojectsassociatedwiththeproposedprojectwouldnotaffecttheSDCWA’sUWMPandRWFMP,theproposedprojectconsistsofazoningordinanceamendmentandisnotprojectspecific;therefore,thepotentialdemandsonimportedwatersupplyofspecificfutureagriculturalprojectscannotbedeterminedatthisstage,norcanappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresbeidentifiedorenforced.Therefore,withrespecttoimportedwatersuppliesconsideredatthecumulativelevel,theproposedprojectcouldhaveacumulativelyconsiderablecontributiontoacumulativeimpact(ImpactWS‐3).
2.8.4.2 Groundwater Supply
Approximately65percentoftheprojectarealiesoutsidetheSDCWAareaandisdependentonnaturallyoccurringgroundwaterresources.WithintheSDCWA,groundwatermayalsobeusedbut
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐24
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
canmoreeasilybesupplementedwithimportedwaterasneeded.Conversely,importedwatermaybesupplementedwithgroundwaterwhenagriculturalconcernsaresubjecttorestrictionsontheuseofimportedwaterandgroundwaterisavailable.
GroundwateravailabilityissubjecttomanyfactorswithinSanDiegoCountysuchasphysicalgeologicalpropertiesandamountofgroundwaterrechargeandstorage.FracturedrockaquifersaretheprevailingaquifertypeintheCounty.Thistypeofaquiferhaslowgroundwaterstoragecapacity,andgroundwaterlevelscanfluctuatewidelyduetodifferencesinannualprecipitationandgroundwateruse.Therearealsoextensiveareasofalluvialaquifers(suchastheRamonaarea),whichhavelargergroundwaterstoragecapacityandwheregroundwaterlevelsarenotsubjecttodrasticvariations.However,wheregroundwaterdemandexceedstherateofrecharge,historicalgroundwaterlevelsdemonstrateatrendofdecline.
OneoftheobjectivesoftheproposedordinanceamendmentistoencouragethegrowthofthelocalagricultureindustryintheCounty,whichcouldresultinnewand/orexpandedagricultureoperationsandnewaccessorystructures.Thiswouldcauseacorrespondingincreaseinthedemandforgroundwaterforirrigation,alcoholicbeverageproduction,andcustomerneedsassociatedwiththepromoteduses.
Theseverityofanyimpactsassociatedwithincreasedgroundwateruse,asaresultoftheprojectandinconjunctionwithotherexistingandplanneduses,willbedependentuponseveralfactorsincludingbutnotlimitedtothefollowing:
Physicalpropertiesoftheunderlyingaquifer;
Whetherirrigationdemandsareincreasedforneworexpandedagricultureoperationsandalcoholicbeverageproduction;and
Cumulativedemandsontheaquiferfromnearbyagriculturalorothertypesoflanduses.
Locationsofgroundwatersupplyissues(suchasdeclinesinthegroundwatertable,poorgroundwaterrecovery,lowwellyield,poorgroundwaterquality)aredescribedintheGeneralPlanUpdateGroundwaterStudy(publishedApril2010);however,localizedgroundwatersupplyproblemsarenotlimitedtotheseareas.SuchconcernsarepossiblethroughouttheCountywherethereisexcessivegroundwaterusebyasingleormultipleusers,orduetotheuniquephysicalgeologicpropertiesaffectingthegroundwaterstorageforaparticularsite.Futureprojectsmayincludeactionsthatrequirediscretionarypermitsand/orgroundwaterinvestigations.Forsuchprojects,feasiblemitigationmeasurescouldbeincludedinthepermit,thusmakingthemenforceable.Atthesametime,theremayalsobefutureby‐rightprojects,forwhichrelateddiscretionarypermitsarerequired(e.g.,gradingpermit),butforwhichmitigationwouldnotbefeasible,orforwhichnorelateddiscretionarypermitisrequiredatall(e.g.,wheregradingislessthan200cubicyards,butwhichwouldaffectnativeorfallowland).Forsuchby‐rightprojects,CEQAreviewwouldnotberequired.Theproposedprojectconsistsofazoningordinanceamendmentandisnotprojectspecific;therefore,thepotentialdemandsongroundwatersuppliesofspecificfutureagricultureprojectscannotbedeterminedatthisstage,norcanappropriateproject‐specificmitigationmeasuresbeidentifiedorenforced.Additionally,thenumberandlocationofneworexpandedagriculturaloperationsthatwillrelyongroundwaterfortheirprimarywatersourceisunknown,andtheproposedprojectmaycauseorcontributetodepletionofgroundwatersupplieswheresuppliesarelimitedand/oryieldsofgroundwaterarelow.Consequently,withrespecttogroundwatersupplies,cumulativeimpactswouldbepotentiallysignificant(ImpactWS‐4).
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐25
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
2.8.5 Significance of Impacts Prior to Mitigation
Theproposedprojectwouldresultinpotentiallysignificantimpactsassociatedwithwatersupply(ImpactsWS‐1andWS‐3,directandcumulative)andgroundwatersupply(ImpactsWS‐2andWS‐4,directandcumulative).
2.8.6 Mitigation Measures
Theproposedprojectisazoningordinanceamendmentandisnotprojectspecific.Theproposedzoningordinanceamendmentwouldallowspecifiedaccessoryagriculturalusesby‐rightwithinA70,A72,S88,S90,andS92zones.Someoftheseunidentifiedfutureagriculturaloperationsmayberequiredtoobtainadiscretionarypermit,suchasanAdministrativePermit,whichwouldtriggerCEQAreview.Forsuchagriculturaloperations,feasiblemitigationmeasurescouldbeincludedinthepermit,ifnecessary,afterconductingthenecessarywatersupplyreview,thusmakingthemenforceable.Thus,forfutureagriculturaloperationssubjecttoCEQAreview,specificimpactsonbothimportedandgroundwatersupplyresourceswouldbeanalyzedandmitigatedwhenfeasible.
Theremayalsobefutureby‐rightagriculturaloperationsforwhichrelateddiscretionarypermitsarerequiredbutforwhichmitigationwouldnotbefeasible,orfutureby‐rightagriculturaloperationsforwhichnorelateddiscretionarypermitisrequiredatall(e.g.,wheregradingvolumeislessthan200cubicyards).Forsuchby‐rightagriculturaloperations,CEQAreviewwouldnotberequired,andappropriatemitigationwouldnotbepossible.
Asitcannotbeconcludedatthisstagethatpotentialimpactsoneitherimportedwatersupplyorgroundwaterresourcesfromallfutureagriculturaloperationsallowedbytheordinanceamendmentwouldbeavoidedormitigated,impactswouldremainsignificantandunmitigated.
2.8.6.1 Water Supply
Theproposedprojectwouldpromotethedevelopmentofaccessoryagriculturefacilities,someofwhichwouldnotneeddiscretionaryreview.Mitigationmeasures(describedbelow)havebeenidentifiedthatwouldreduceimpactsrelatedtowatersupply,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.
M‐WS‐1:ImplementPolicyI‐84requiringdiscretionaryprojectsobtainwaterdistrictcommitmentthatwaterservicesareavailable.Prohibitionoftheconversionofanydrylandagriculturalornon‐irrigatedlandstocropproduction.
M‐WS‐2:CoordinatewiththeSanDiegoCountyWaterAuthorityandotherwateragenciestocoordinatelanduseplanningwithwatersupplyplanningandsupportcontinuedimplementationandenhancementofwaterconservationprograms.
2.8.6.2 Groundwater Supply
Theproposedprojectwouldpromotethedevelopmentofaccessoryagriculturefacilities,someofwhichwouldnotneeddiscretionaryreview.Mitigationmeasures(describedbelow)havebeenidentifiedthatwouldreduceimpactsrelatedtogroundwatersupply,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.MitigationMeasuresM‐HY‐1,M‐HY‐2,M‐HY‐3(Section2.5,HydrologyandWaterQuality),M‐WS‐1,andM‐WS‐2,aswellasthosedescribedbelow,havebeenidentifiedthatwouldreduceimpactsrelatedtogroundwatersupply,butnotbelowasignificantlevel.
County of San Diego Section 2.8. Water Supply and Groundwater
Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Agriculture Promotion Project 2.8‐26
February 2017
ICF 0054.15
M‐WS‐3:UsetheCountyGuidelinesforDeterminingSignificanceforGroundwaterResources,SurfaceWaterQuality,andHydrologytoidentifyandminimizeadverseenvironmentaleffectsongroundwaterresources.ImplementtheGroundwaterOrdinancethroughaGroundwaterInvestigationinordertoensurethatgroundwaterresourcesareadequatetomeetthegroundwaterdemandsoftheproject.
2.8.7 Conclusion
Theproposedordinanceamendmentcouldresultintheadditionofnewagriculturaloperations,expansionofexistingagriculturaloperations,andadditionalaccessorystructuresatexistingagriculturaloperations.Theexpansionandopeningofnewagriculturaloperationscouldoccurby‐rightwithouttheneedforadiscretionarypermit.Significantdirectandcumulativeimpactscouldresultfromneworexpandedagriculturaloperationsonlandsnotcurrentlyirrigatedorwheregroundwatersuppliesarelimitedand/oryieldsofgroundwaterarelow(ImpactsWS‐1,WS‐2,WS‐3,andWS‐4).
Somefutureagriculturaloperations,inaccordancewiththeproposedprojectzoningordinanceamendment,mayberequiredtoobtainadiscretionarypermit,whichwouldtriggerCEQAreviewofthespecificproposedproject,andmitigationmeasurescouldbeincludedinthepermit,thusmakingthemenforceable.However,theremayalsobefutureby‐rightagriculturaloperations,forwhichnorelateddiscretionarypermitwouldberequired,orfutureagriculturaloperationsforwhichmitigationmeasuresareinfeasible.Thus,withoutamechanismtodemonstratethatallimpactshavebeenreducedtobelowalevelofsignificance,impactsremainsignificantandunmitigated.