Sedimentation field flow fractionation (SdFFF)of soot particles emitted by a light duty diesel
James R. Kassab1,2, Annett Wollmann3, Richard Zahoransky2, Michael Claussen3, Philippe J.P. Cardot1*
1 Laboratoire de Chimie Analytique et de Bromatologie, Université de Limoges Faculté de Pharmacie, 2 Rue du Dr. Marcland, F-87025 Limoges
2 Fachhochschule Offenburg, University of Applied Sciences, Badstr. 24, D-77652 Offenburg
3 CUTEC Institut GmbH, Leibnizstr. 21 & 23, D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Content
• Field Flow Fractionation: Subtechnique Sedimentation FFFSdFFF; theory of retention and field programming
• Off-line hyphenation of SdFFF with Optical MultiwavelengthTechnique (OMT) for particle analysis
• SdFFF system in use
• Soot collection and sample preparation
• Soot fractionation and size analysis by OMT
• Comparison to size analysis by SMPS
• Conclusion
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Field Flow Fractionation (FFF)
• First conceptualized by Giddings 1960s
• Separation occurs inside a thin ribbonlike channel clamped between two highly polished plane and parallel walls
Parabolic flow profile
Flow in Flow out
External field
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Overview on FFF subtechniques
+semipermeable
walls
Hot plate (metal)
Cold plate (metal)
dTdx
Thermal FFF
E
-Electrical FFF
U (cross flow)
inflow
outflow
Flow FFF
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Sedimentation FFF (SdFFF)
SdFFF separator principle Cross sectional view of the channel
Accumulation wall
Spin DirectionFlow in
Flow out
Inlet streamOutletstream
Thickness
Zone A
w
Parabolicflow profile
Injection
Exit port(to detector)
Rotation Flow
Zone B
rω2r
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Retention in the normal mode
External field
Flow
Zone A (slow) Zone B (fast)
Parabolicflow profile
Accumulation wall
x
z
lA
lBV1
V2
V1
V2
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Sedimentation field programming
Accumulation wall
Relaxation time
l1l2 l3 l4
0
0.05
0.1
0 30 60 90Time (min)
Det
ecto
r sig
nal (
mV
)
1 2 3 4
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Off-line hyphenation of OMT with SdFFF
Combining the size separation technique SdFFFwith the particle sensor
OMT (Optical Multiwavelength Technique WIZARD DQ):Benefit from the separation potential of SdFFF to measure the mean particle sizes of collected fractions obtained frombroadly distributed particulate sample
Confirmation whether a selective FFF separation occurred according to the concerned elution mode
Obtained sizes can be compared to those determined by other sizing techniques such as EM and PCS
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Dispersion Quotient Technique (1): OMT principle
monodisperseI = I0·exp{-N·L·π·r2·Qext(r,λ,n)}
polydisperseI = I0·exp{-L·N·π·∫ r2·Qext(λ,r,n)·p(r)dr
LASER
L
Detector
IntensityI0
IntensityI
Particle Cloud
with:I = intensityI0 = initial intensityN = particle concentrationL = optical path lengthr = particle radius Qext = extinction coefficientλ = wavelength n = refractive indexp(r) = number distribution
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Dispersion Quotient Technique (2)OMT Principle
2ln
1ln
0
0
1
λ
λ
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛
⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛
=
IIII
DQ
measured values),,(
),,(
2
12
2
nrQnrQ
rLNrLN
ext
ext
λλ
ππ
⋅⋅⋅⋅−⋅⋅⋅−
=
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Transient Measurements (ECE)
OMT Particle Analyzer(WIZARD-DQL)
ECE Cycle
LD Engine
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time [sec]
Mea
n di
amet
er [µ
m]
0.0E+00
1.0E-09
2.0E-09
3.0E-09
4.0E-09
5.0E-09
6.0E-09
7.0E-09
8.0E-09
9.0E-09
Volu
me
conc
entr
atio
n [m
3 /m3 ]
Diameter
Concentration
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time [sec]
Spee
d of
rot.
[rpm
]
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
Torq
ue [N
m]
Pow
er [k
W]
Speed
Power
Torque
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time [s]
Inte
nsiti
es
635 nm
810 nm
1310 nm
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Schematic of the OMT
LASER 1
LASER 2
LASER 3
LASER -CONTROL
OPTICS
Reference Detector
TIME CONTROL SIGNAL INTERFACE
POWER SUPPLY
Signal DetectorMeasurement chamber
Central Unit
Sensor Head
Data Acquisition
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
OMT: WIZARD DQLLight Beam, 3 Wave Lengths
ControlUnit
Sensor Head
to Measure-ment Chamber& Detector(Not Shown)
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Off-line hyphenation set up
SdFFFseparator
Time dependent fraction collection
Fraction concentrationOMT unit
Fraction collector
CentrifugationVolume reductionSonication & vortexing
Microcuvette of 160 µL volume capacity
1 cm optical path length
Elution after retention
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
FFF System: SdFFF
DetectorInjection System
Pump
Channel
External Field
Spin DirectionFlow in
Flow out
Inlet streamOutletstream
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
SdFFF separator
rotor bowl
inlet tubing
rotor axisrotating seal
inlet tubing
outlet tubing
motor anti-vibrationsystem
rotating seal
outlet tubing
Rotor bowl
Tachometer
Rotatingseal
Front View
Rotor bowl
3-phase engine
Rotating seal
Back View
Diesel engine at CUTEC site
• 4 cylinder LD VW EURO III 85 KW engine, displacement volume 1.9 L
• Variable geometry torroidal technology (VGT)
• Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR)
• Pump unit injection (PUI)
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Engine Set-up at CUTEC Site
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Dilution system
Second injectordilution ratio:1:5 - 1:30
Filter holder
Heated hose200ºC
Pump70 L/min
Flowmeter
Injectordilution ratio:1:7 - 1:10
Micro dilutiontunnel
• Micro dilution tunnel
• Rapid mixing with the conditioned ambient air or dilution air
• Constant volume sampling (CVS)
• Teflon coated glass fiber filters Pallflex (70 mm diameter)
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Sample preparation
• Soot recovery by bath-sonication in 10 ml ethanol
• Mixture of ethanol+soot with 10 ml n-hexane
• After the removal of n-hexane, 5 ml distilled water containing 0.1% (w/v) and 0.02% NaN3 are added
• Dispersion by 10 min bath-sonication
• Ethanol evaporation by heating at 70ºC
• Sonication by a sonic dismembrator for 90 min and vortexing
• Carrier liquid and suspension media: doubly distilled water containing 0.1% (w/v) and 0.02% NaN3
• Injection volume: 100 µL
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Surfactant concentration effect
Elution conditions: initial field strength = 600g (1972 rpm); injection flow rate=0.2 ml/min; Predecay time= 5 min; stop flow time=15 min; final field strength=29.60g (439 rpm); elution flow rate= 1.2 ml/min
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Sonication effect
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Soot elution by SdFFF
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
TEM pictures of soot (aerosol)
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Engine speed effect on particle size at 180 Nm torque
Engine speed effect on particle size at 80 NM
0
60
120
180
1 2 3
Soot samples
Mea
n pa
rticl
e siz
e (n
m)
0
6
12
18
PM p
r hou
r (m
g)
OMTSdFFFSMPSPM per hour
1800 RPM 2400 RPM 3000 RPM
0
40
80
120
160
1 2 3
Soot samples
Mea
npa
rtic
lesi
ze(n
m)
0
2
4
6
PM p
er h
our(
mg)
1800 rpm 2400 rpm 3000 rpm
OMTSdFFFSMPSPM per hour
In exhaust (aerosol)
In suspension
SMPS
OMT: primary particles
SdFFF OMT
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Torque effect on particle size at 3000 rpmTorque effect on particle size at 1800 RPM
0
60
120
180
1 2Soot samples
Mea
n pa
rticl
e siz
e (n
m)
0
6
12
18
PM p
er h
our (
mg)
OMTSdFFFSMPSPM per hour
80 NM 180 NM
Torque effect on particle size at 2400 RPM
0
70
140
1 2Soot samples
Mea
n pa
rticl
e siz
e (n
m)
0
2
4
6
PM p
er h
our (
mg)
OMTSdFFFSMPSPM per hour
80 NM 180 NM0
40
80
120
160
1 2
Soot samples
Mea
npa
rtic
lesi
ze(n
m)
0
4
8
12
PM p
er h
our(
mg)
80 Nm 180 Nm
In suspensionOMT
OMTSdFFFSMPSPM per hour
In exhaust (aerosol)
SMPS
OMT: prim. particles
SdFFF
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004
Conclusion
• Soot particle size variation analyzed by OMT and SdFFFin the collected PM amount is related to the different engine load conditions
• The detected mean soot particle sizes in liquid suspen-sions differ appreciably to those in aerosols:
- SdFFF and OMT measurements in liquid: 120 – 160 nm- OMT measurements in the raw exhaust: approx. 20 nm
(primary particles)- SMPS measurements in the diluted exhaust: 60 – 80 nm
• Different soot agglomerates in liquid and aerosol
• Surprisingly, the suspended soot particles keep specific characteristics related to engine load conditions
8th ETH Conf. on Combustion Generated Nanoparticles Aug. 2004