+ All Categories

SEIS01

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: bobby-wsk
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 84

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    1/84

    January 2009

    Long-range Science PLan for SeiSmoLogy WorkShoP

    SePtember 1819, 2008, Denver, co

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    2/84

    PrePared by the

    SeiSmological grand challengeS

    Writing grouP

    ts p s w pss ssss

    Sp 18-19, 2008, wsp l r S P Ss

    (lrSPS), dv, c, ~ 120 s ss-

    ps s . i s s p w

    p v ss .

    t pp s lrSPS Wsp

    p://www.s./q/sps.

    F spp lrSPS Wsp ws pv n S

    F (nSF). ls spp lrSPS Wsp pp ss s p w pv iriS cs. g Ps

    pv s sss. ts p s s

    nSF s.

    PreFerred citation

    l, t., . 2009.Seismological Grand Challenges in Understanding Earths Dynamic

    Systems. rp n S F, iriS cs, 76 pp.

    t l, e

    r c. as, wsp -

    d W. Fs, wsp -

    b rwz, wsp -

    r m. a

    V F. c

    J g

    J a. h

    g mss

    d S

    a S

    J tp

    m e. Wsss

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    3/84

    SeiSmoLogicaLgranD chaLLengeS

    in unDerStanDingearthS DynamicSyStemS

    January 2009

    long-range Science Plan For Sei Smology WorkShoP

    SePtember 1819, 2008, denVer, co

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    4/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    5/84

    contentS

    ev S.......................................................................................................................................................1

    i: t Ss dsp ...................................................................................................................4

    g cs Ss ................................................................................................................................10

    g c 1. hw d Fs Sp? .................................................................................................................11

    g c 2. hw ds n-S ev a n hzs rss? ..................17

    g c 3. W s rsp bw Sss S lsp? .................................24

    g c 4. hw d Psss o asp i W S e?.....................28g c 5. W a W hs h b S? .........................................32

    g c 6. hw d ms as ep? ........................................................................................36

    g c 7. W is lsp-assp b? ................................................................40

    g c 8. hw d P b Sss evv? ................................................................................45

    g c 9. hw d tp cps Vs c m c cv? ......50

    g c 10. hw a es i bs a ds?.................................................55

    Ss h F Ss ................................................................................................................59

    S ....................................................................................................................................................................67

    app: k Ss Ps .......................................................................................................................68

    m d Psss es ev ..........................................................................................68

    ms 3d 4d i m cp e Sss ...............................................................70

    r r ..............................................................................................................................................73

    as ts ....................................................................................................................................................74

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    6/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    7/84

    1

    eismology is the study o Earths elastic vibrations, the sources that generate them,

    and the structures through which they propagate. It is a geophysical discipline

    that has a remarkable diversity o applications to critical issues acing society and

    plays a leading role in addressing key scientic rontiers involving Earths dynamic

    systems. Seismology enjoys quantitative oundations rooted in continuum mechanics,elasticity, and applied mathematics. Modern seismological systems utilize state-o-the-

    art digital ground motion recording sensors and real-time communications systems,

    and anyone can openly access many seismological data archives.

    Seismologists keep their ear on Earths internal systems, listening or signals aris-

    ing rom both natural and human-made energy sources distributed around the globe.

    Tese seismic signals contain a wealth o inormation that enables seismologists to

    quantiy active wave sources and determine structures and processes at all depths in

    the planetary interior. Tis is done at higher resolution than is possible by any other

    approach, revealing structures associated with dynamic processes that are active nowor have been ongoing over multibillion years. Recent breakthroughs in theory and data

    processing now allow every byte o continuous seismological data acquired to be used

    or imaging sources and structures throughout these dynamic systems, even extract-

    ing coherent signals rom what had previously been dismissed as background noise.

    Ground-motion recordings are intrinsically multi-use; seismic data collected to moni-

    tor any specic Earth phenomenon, or example, underground nuclear tests, can also

    advance studies o earthquake sources or deep Earth structure. Tis multi-use attribute

    o seismic data places great value in the prevailing philosophies o open data access and

    real-time data collection embraced by the U.S. seismological research community and

    many o its international partners.

    S

    executiVeSummary

    executiVe Summary

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    8/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    9/84

    3

    Maintaining a healthy national research capability in seismology to pursue the many

    societally important applications o the discipline and to address the 10 Grand Challenge

    research questions requires sustained and expanded support o seismic data acquisition,

    archival, and distribution acilities. Global and regional seismological networks with acommitment to long-term operation, and pools o portable instruments or shorter-

    term land- and sea-based deployments, provide key observations essential to tackling

    the Grand Challenges. Te Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS), the primary

    earthquake monitoring system in the United States, must be completed. Te currently

    sparse instrumental coverage o the vast areas o unexplored ocean oor needs to be

    expanded. Source acilities or controlled-source seismic data acquisition are essential

    to support crustal reection and reraction imaging, including marine airguns, explo-

    sions in boreholes, and vibrating trucks. Cooperation among academic, government,

    and industry eorts in controlled-source seismology must be enhanced to support the

    Grand Challenge eorts. Completion o the planned deployment o the EarthScoperansportable Array across the conterminous United States and Alaska is important

    or achieving the maniold science goals o that major NSF program. International par-

    ticipation in open seismic data exchange or diverse seismic networks around the world

    must be diplomatically pursued and expanded. Interdisciplinary workshops addressing

    critical problems o the near-surace environment and deep Earth should be promoted,

    with active seismological participation.

    Many o the government and private sector users o seismology are now conronted

    with serious workorce shortages. Expanded eorts are required to attract quantita-

    tively oriented, diverse students to the discipline. Tese eorts should be abetted bybuilding on current education and outreach endeavors o the seismological community,

    and by developing stronger partnerships among academic, industry, and government

    laboratories, which are all impacted by workorce-shortage issues. At the same time,

    some trends toward reducing seismological sta and resources in government labs need

    to be reversed to sustain contributions o the discipline.

    Seismology holds great promise or achieving major breakthroughs on the Seismological

    Grand Challenge questions and associated societal benets over the next ew decades,

    as long as ederal agencies and industry continue to invest in basic research programs

    and inrastructure or this burgeoning geophysical discipline. With the well-established

    practices o open data sharing, expanding eorts to share sotware and to develop

    community models, and the multi-use aspect o all seismic data, bountiul return on

    investments in seismological inrastructure and training is assured. As progress on the

    Seismological Grand Challenges is made, the undamental understanding o Earths

    dynamic systems that is gained will advance the sustainability and security o human

    civilization, along with satisying our deep curiosity about how planet Earth works.

    executiVe Summary

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    10/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    11/84

    5

    resources. Seismology intrinsically provides unpar-

    alleled resolution o physical properties in the inac-

    cessible interior rom the crust to the core. Seismicimaging o ossil-uel-bearing geologic structures is

    essential to discovering, exploiting, and managing

    critical energy resources that power global civiliza-

    tion. When nuclear testing moved underground dur-

    ing the Cold War, seismology assumed a key role in

    treaty verication and in remote monitoring o weap-

    ons development programs.

    With these new roles in hydrocarbon exploration and

    national security monitoring eorts complementingearthquake studies and Earth structure research, seis-

    mology rapidly grew into a major high-tech research

    discipline. oday, global seismometer networks trans-

    mit ground motion recordings rom around the world

    in real time via satellite, microwave, or Internet telem-

    etry to data analysis centers. Automated computer

    processing o the accumulated seismic signals is per-

    ormed by many government agencies and research

    programs to produce rapid bulletins o global seis-micity and prompt inormation or disaster mitiga-

    tion. Tese activities are essential or the continu-

    ous monitoring o the Earth system, and there is still

    much room or improvement o methodologies used

    in many eorts. Large-scale deployments o land- and

    sea-based instruments utilize both active human-made

    sources and passive natural sources o seismic waves,

    revealing multiscale structures o the crust and deep

    Earth. Massive online data repositories reely provide

    the data to scientists, enabling research and monitoringapplications across academic, government, and com-

    mercial sectors. Te complexity o seismic wave pro-

    cessing and modeling eorts combined with very large

    seismic data sets has placed seismology as a primary

    driver o high-perormance computing at universities,

    national laboratories, and industry or many decades.

    11/2008

    JapanGSN U.S.Australia Germany ItalyFrance OtherCanada

    International Federation of

    Digital Seismograph Networks

    introduction

    t ss s p s p s -q -

    ss ss i F d Ssp nws (FdSn), w s

    iriS/uSgS g Ssp nw (gSn). (i s r. b.)

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    12/84

    6

    volcanic eruptions, explosions, mine collapses, rock

    bursts, landslides) that have very long-term nega-

    tive impacts on human lie, property, and inrastruc-

    ture, near-real-time access to seismic data is also o

    great importance. Whenever it is possible to transmit

    ground motion data to open archives in real time, mul-tiple societal applications o the signals are enabled.

    By its very nature, seismology is sensitive to many

    active, dynamic processes happening today in Earths

    dynamic systems, and the discipline has expanded its

    scope to include detecting and characterizing numer-

    ous aspects o environmental change and near-surace

    processes, including ground-water distribution, glacial

    motions, storm migration, the ocean wave environ-

    ment, and ocean circulation. Much o modern Earthscience research addresses complex physical systems

    that involve interaces among multiple disciplines,

    and seismology oers powerul tools or remote sens-

    ing o structures and sources that complement other

    approaches. Tis central importance o seismol-

    ogy is noted in many major scientic planning doc-

    uments (e.g., BROES, 2001; IUGG, 2007), and a

    suite o research community organizations (CIDER,

    COMPRES, CSEDI, FDSN, IASPEI, IAVCEI,

    IRIS, MARGINS, RIDGE, SCEC, UNAVCOall

    A dening attribute o seismograms is that they are

    simply records o ground motion as a unction o

    time. Tus, seismic data recorded by a network o seis-

    mometers or any particular purpose (e.g., monitor-

    ing nuclear testing or earthquake hazard analysis),

    intrinsically provide signals that are valuable or mul-tiple unrelated uses. One can equally well study Earth

    structure, earthquakes, explosions, volcanic eruptions,

    and other processes with the same seismograms.

    Study o the diverse Earth systems requires glob-

    ally distributed sensors and international collabora-

    tions on data acquisition and exchange. Te multi-use

    attribute o seismic signals places a great premium on

    continuously recording ground motions over as wide

    o a requency band as possible, archiving all record-

    ings in accessible ormats, and openly sharing thedata between nations and institutions, no matter what

    the original motivation was or deploying the seis-

    mic instrumentation. Te U.S. seismological commu-

    nity, and its international partners in the Federation

    o Digital Seismograph Networks (FDSN), have

    strongly ostered this ramework o open access to

    seismic data, establishing data centers that are acces-

    sible to all researchers. Because the data play criti-

    cal roles in rapid evaluation o short-term changes in

    Earths dynamic systems (e.g., earthquakes, tsunamis,

    introduction

    Cumulative Terabytes Archived by Network Type

    through August 31, 2008

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Year

    Cumulativ

    eTerabytesinArchive

    Terabytes Shipped by Network Type

    through August 31, 2008

    0.0

    5.0

    10.0

    15.0

    20.0

    25.0

    30.0

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Year

    Annual

    TerabytesShipped

    USArrayFDSNRegional DataPASSCALGSN

    USArrayFDSNRegional DataPASSCALGSN

    t v v ss v iriS d m c () j ss ws s 81.3 s s

    as 2008. t s spp iriS dmc () s ss w ps s w s s w

    v dmc, w 35 s ss 2008. (i s t. a.)

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    13/84

    7

    acronyms are dened at the end o the report) engage

    seismologists with synergistic disciplines in min-

    eral physics, geodynamics, volcanology, geology, and

    increasingly, oceanography, hydrology, glaciology, cli-

    mate, and atmospheric sciences.

    Tis centrality o seismology in Earth science and

    global monitoring engages multiple U.S. ederal

    agencies in supporting the discipline, including the

    National Science Foundation (NSF), the United

    States Geological Survey (USGS), the National

    Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

    the Department o Energy (DOE), the Department o

    Deense (DoD), the Federal Emergency Management

    Agency (FEMA), and the National Aeronautics

    and Space Administration (NASA). Tis diversityo supporting agencies has beneted the discipline

    immensely, and reects the multi-use nature o seis-

    mological data. U.S. seismology is deeply engaged

    in international activities such as the International

    Monitoring System (IMS) o the Comprehensive

    Nuclear est Ban reaty Organization (CBO), and

    the Global Earth Observations System o Systems

    (GEOSS), placing the discipline in high-level, scien-

    tically and politically inuential roles.

    One sign o a healthy scientic enterprise is that it

    is producing major advances and paradigm shits.

    As maniest in this report, seismology is a dynamic

    and energized eld, with a continually expanding

    portolio o important contributions. Examples o

    recent transormative developments in the discipline

    include the ollowing:

    Creation o the open-access online seismic data

    repository o the Incorporated Research Institutions

    or Seismology (IRIS) Data Management System

    (DMS) has enabled prolierating discoveries and

    new societal applications by many researchers. Tis

    acility, which houses terabytes o seismic data, reely

    delivers these data to the entire world, an approach

    being emulated internationally.

    Te availability and centralized maintenance o large

    pools o state-o-the-art portable seismographs, such

    as IRIS PASSCAL, has driven a new era o discov-

    ery in seismic source and structural studies across

    the discipline.

    Te discovery o coherent inormation contained in

    recorded seismic noise allows virtually every data

    byte to be used or scientic application; entirely new

    approaches to structural studies and investigations

    o changes in the oceanic and atmospheric environ-

    ment have emerged. Earths background vibrations

    contain inormation about sources and structures

    that was not recognized until recently.

    introduction

    a p sw v r wv ( p ss s

    wv) p v 8 s p vs v

    60,000 ss. b ss p s

    s 512 ws u.S. ss,

    eSp uSa tsp a ss -

    ws, -s pp vs v s

    ps w v v v s. t

    s j pv s. (i s

    m.P. ms, m.h. rzw, n.m. Sp.)

    2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2

    U (km/s), 8 sec

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    14/84

    8

    Te recent discovery o a continuous spectrum o

    aulting behavior, ranging rom conventional earth-

    quakes that rupture at great speeds (including super-

    shear velocities) to slow earthquakes that involve

    anomalously slow rupturessome so slow that the

    sliding motion does not radiate detectable seismicwaves or is maniested in seismic tremorhas uni-

    ed seismic and geodetic monitoring o ault zones

    and may have undamental importance or rictional

    sliding processes and earthquake hazard.

    Te discovery o the predominance o large-scale

    structures with anomalous elastic properties in the

    deep mantle by imaging methods (e.g., seismic

    tomography) has brought a paradigm shit to our

    understanding o mantle convection and thermalevolution o Earths deep interior, with new empha-

    sis on thermo-chemical dynamics.

    Project EarthScope, a major research eort unded

    primarily by NSF, is providing unprecedented spa-

    tial coverage o seismic and geodetic observations

    introduction

    t 2001 k (mw

    7.8) q p 400

    k t s s s-sp

    vs ss ws. t s s -q ss s s

    -pj P-wvs, w ss

    s p . ass sws p pp

    ~ 2.6 /s s 120 ~ 5.7 /s,

    sp-s (s S-wv sp) v

    s 290 w p. (i s k.t. W

    P.m. S.)

    0 200 km

    subshear(2.6km/s) supershear(5.7km/s)

    Kunlun Pass fault

    Kunlunfault

    overallrupturedirection

    USGS epicenter

    Faults

    Harvard CMT

    b) Depth = 600 km

    c) Depth = 2800 km

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    2000

    2200

    2400

    2600

    2800

    Depth(km)

    Angular Degree0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

    a)

    Pps 3d S-wv ve sw () pw sp-

    v vs s -

    (vs

    pp sp s)

    p; s pw, s

    w pw. S v s

    () 600- p, ( s s,

    s sw; s s 2%), ()

    2800- p (s s 3%). l-

    sp-s ( 2) ps -

    s ps,

    s ss 600

    ps w w-

    s-v pvs a P s

    v v-

    s -P

    2800- p. t p

    v -s s-

    w s ss vs

    s p -

    v (i s

    b. ksws, g. es, a. dzws.)

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    15/84

    9

    across North America, revealing ne-scale crustal

    and mantle structures that are divulging secrets o

    continental evolution.

    Te emergence o quantitative physics-based pre-

    dictions o surace ground motions using realisticdynamic ault rupture models and 3D geological

    structures has begun to transorm earthquake haz-

    ard analysis, complementing the emergence o per-

    ormance-based earthquake engineering.

    Te discovery o remote triggering o earthquakes

    and enhanced understanding o earthquake inter-

    actions has provided new insights into the stress

    changes that lead to earthquake initiation.

    Te tsunami generated by the great 2004 Sumatra

    earthquake reafrmed the catastrophic potential

    o natural events and the need or early-warning

    systems. Automated data collection and process-

    ing are enabling near-real-time responses to earth-

    quake occurrence, including seismic shaking and

    tsunami-warning systems that have potential to

    save many lives.

    Te continued health and vigor o seismology requiresederal and industry attention to critical ounda-

    tions o the discipline and expansion o the base

    upon which uture advances can be built. Core needs

    include sustaining and expanding data collection

    and dissemination inrastructure, providing access to

    high-perormance computational resources, attracting

    and supporting diverse, quantitatively oriented stu-

    dents to the discipline, and ostering interdisciplin-

    ary collaborations to study complex Earth systems.

    o clariy the critical unctions and potential contri-

    butions that seismology can make and the inrastruc-

    ture needed to achieve the ull span o possibilities,

    the seismology community has identied 10 Grand

    Challenge research questions or the next ew decades

    and the associated inrastructure needs essential or

    making progress on these topics.

    introduction

    rp zs 26 d 2004 (ss -

    mw

    = 9.2) 28 m 2005 (mw

    = 8.7) S -

    qs. t 2004 v s v

    225,000 vs i o. i s ss-

    ss sss v s w p sp v

    , w sp v s z, w ss-

    -sp sv s vs. es

    ss w s-w sss i o

    c w w. (i s c .J. a.)

    2004

    2005

    14

    12

    10

    8

    6

    4

    2

    0

    -2

    90 92 94 96 98 100 102

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    16/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    17/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    18/84

    12

    Ss sss ss -

    qs v , s w

    p. t s q s pp vs-

    s, uSgS, i Ss c (iSc),

    zs sv s ss-

    z ss s s pps. t p

    sws s 82,000 qs

    S as F ss w 1984 2003,

    s ss w. t ss s

    vs pps s w

    s sp .

    m vs w s

    pp s, v-

    zs. nw p-

    s s vs p-

    v v ps v s,

    ss w s s

    s s w s, s -

    pss p-

    . F

    c sw p

    , 12%

    qs s

    p s

    19- sv p. rp qs -

    s p. ts sv

    sss sps s ws s s

    s s pw s w ss

    -sss sp. (i

    F. Ws d.P. S, 2008. l-s

    w s n c ss s

    ss- - s,Journal of

    Geophysical Research, 113, b08311, :10.1029/2007Jb005479.)

    Ss

    Sid

    eba

    r

    1

    and pressures along ault zones play important roles

    in rictional behavior, and seismological eorts have

    succeeded in imaging uid distributions at depth.

    Catalogs o the locations o massive numbers o tiny

    to moderate earthquakes, accurate within tens o

    meters, reveal diverse rictional behavior among aultsand along a single ault surace. Persistent alignments

    o small earthquakes on aults have been discovered by

    precise event locations, and many examples o virtu-

    ally identical earthquakes recurring at the same loca-

    tion on a ault have been studied. Global and regional

    arrays o seismic stations and deep borehole seismic

    instruments like those deployed in the EarthScope

    SAFOD drill hole, provide recordings that capture

    the initiation, growth, and termination o ault rup-

    tures. Resulting kinematic and dynamic aulting mod-els constrain physics-based theoretical models that are

    used to predict strong shaking, at least in a probabilistic

    sense. Among the most exciting Earth science discov-

    eries o the past decade have been the coupled phe-

    nomena o slow slip events (detected geodetically) and

    seismic tremor. Te slow slip process appears to repre-

    sent a rictional behavior intermediate between that o

    steady sliding and stick-slip earthquakes. Seismic aulttremor, a low-level seismic rumbling with extended

    duration, correlates with slow slip in some environ-

    ments and may be a superposition o many individual

    subevents, but its nature is still being investigated.

    Seismology has made great progress in the basic

    understanding o how and where aults are likely to

    ail, but there is currently no reliable method or pro-

    ducing short-term warnings o an impending earth-

    quake. Te insights gained have provided useul seis-mic hazard assessments or land-use planning, as

    guidance or construction standards, and or planning

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

    2

    5

    10

    20

    10km

    121.74W 121.29W

    36.74N

    36.93N

    36N

    124W 120W

    40N

    Min. Numberof Repeats

    Repeating EarthquakesHigh Resolution Epicenters

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    19/84

    13

    or emergency response. Far more can be achieved by

    enhancing our undamental level o observations and

    understanding o the physics o earthquake ruptures,

    ranging rom better prediction o ground shaking

    variations, to expansion o early warning systems or

    earthquake and tsunami hazards.

    Sidebar2

    b q, w.

    m wpps w ss

    w s ss s. b

    w v , v w

    s, sp ww. y

    sw sp w -p s

    . n pw ps w

    s w s s s v pps.

    W s vss ss-

    ws sss w s-

    sss s, w

    pv s s s ss

    . ts s s w ps v p

    qs, s -

    p p s, s-

    s q s s

    ss wvs s w q s.

    i , s sps q w v

    s ps w. i o 2007, Jp

    s q w ss. t ss-

    ss w v 1000 ss ss

    qs ps v

    w s s w, ss

    ws p. tw, t, m,

    r s v w sss p,

    s, u Ss, v p-

    p sss vp, j vss w

    q s sss p. ds ps

    s q s s s q, w

    p s , pss. S

    ss s-w sss, w

    p s wv w

    q vs ss sp j p,

    sw ss wvs v .

    eq w amp sw p s

    s o 30, 2007, mw

    5.4 q

    S Js, c. t s ss q

    ssss z s ws S Fs.

    Ps sw p vs, s s 1989

    l P q, v s . (i s r. a.)

    eq rp W Sss

    grand challenge 1

    San Jose

    San FranciscoOakland

    Stockton

    Fremont

    Modesto

    Salinas

    Concord

    Vallejo

    San Mateo

    Tracy

    San Rafael

    Santa CruzGilroy

    Los Banos

    Antioch

    LodiAngels Camp

    0s

    10s

    10s

    1

    0

    s

    20s

    20s

    20

    s

    AlertMap

    0 50

    km

    SHAKING: WEAK STRONG SEVERE

    www.ElarmS.org

    key QueStionS and iSSueS

    What physical properties control diverse types o

    ault sliding?

    How does the relationship between local conditions

    at a point on a ault and conditions over the whole

    ault surace evolve?

    Is there a preparatory stage or ault ruptures? How

    do ruptures stop?

    Are mechanisms o interplate and intraplate earth-

    quakes dierent?

    What rictional constitutive laws govern aulting

    variability, and how are rictional properties dier-

    ent or high-speed slip? What governs transitions

    rom stick-slip behavior to steady sliding?

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    20/84

    14

    css- s ss s w w

    ss pps v ,

    pv pw p s, w p

    v , p s s. a pp-

    s pp s p s v-

    s zs, sp w

    q s. t sws s

    S as F, P, c, w

    v s w S S q

    ( ) P q ( ). t

    s - ss v w

    qs sss s s

    s ss wvs q,

    vs (s) v . t sws p -

    sp w g Ps Ss (gPS) s s-

    p ; - w p s

    v (w-q vs

    s s) v s s

    sss. t -

    sp - vs, s sp,

    v sss sss

    p z

    p ss

    p. (i m. b,

    m. cp, c. hz, n.m.

    Sp, r.m. n, e. ls,

    2008. Psss

    S as F P

    s ss s-

    vs,Science, 321(5895):1478

    1481, :10.1126/s.1160943.

    rp w pss aaaS.)

    What is the undamental nature o high-stress

    asperities (areas o high-slip in an earthquake) and

    the cause o riction variations?

    How is episodic ault tremor and slip related to

    large earthquake occurrence?

    How do earthquake rupture zones recoverand reload?

    How do large and small earthquakes undamentally

    dier, i they do?

    Can rupture directions and associated ground

    motions be anticipated based on material

    properties?

    a ns F Z h

    What are the geometrical properties o ault distri-

    butions and how do ault networks and ault sur-

    aces evolve over time?

    Can we orecast the spatial and temporal occur-

    rence o earthquakes and accurately predict

    their eects on ground motions and on the builtenvironment?

    How quickly can the size o an earthquake be

    determined and reliable shaking and tsunami warn-

    ings issued?

    Sid

    ebar

    3

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

    relativevelocitychange,

    v/v(%)

    San Simeon earthquakeM6.5

    Parkfield earthquakeM6.0

    Displacement,N48W,mm

    0.1

    0.06

    0.04

    0.02

    0

    -0.02

    -0.04

    -0.06

    -0.08-3

    error(%)

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    x 10

    year

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20070

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25tremorrate(min./day)

    0

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    0.08

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    21/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    22/84

    16

    W w b o ? s p qs s

    ssss p. ms pp s s qs

    s ps q , ,

    w p , s s

    w 7.0 q S Fs

    Ws . c q p-

    s ss s

    sp.

    t w pps s p. t s s

    sv pp ss s q

    ps s. t s w

    qs. u, s vs ps ss . t s ps ss

    p s qs, sp v-

    s. cs s ss s

    s, s ss vs , vs

    ssv p, q ss,

    s -w vs s . ts sv-

    s w s s s -

    s sp sv q

    s q ww q. i s

    p ps ss v pss

    v s s q.

    t s pp s vp s

    p ps ss sps qs.

    eqs vv psss p sp

    p ss w svs sv .

    m pss s s s -

    , sss , , p -

    s, s s psss

    pss p. i s s v pv

    s ps ss s -ps

    q s w p v

    s. W w s s

    ps q s v - sps q ss. S s ps

    psss qs s v ps

    w v w sps p q ss

    s p , w svs

    s psps pv s pv ps.

    t p q pss, s

    sv s, q p -

    p p. ev qs

    p w p -

    , s w sv p ss q p-

    . t nw os h k ss

    v w ss s p sv s

    v, s -

    s -

    q ppss p

    v v. i

    ws qs,

    s vs w s

    s. i s s -

    v ss-

    pv-

    s

    q

    s ss

    w s v q

    p s v v.

    b vs 2008

    W q c.

    eq P P

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

    Sidebar

    5

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    23/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    24/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    25/84

    19

    Near-surace processes aect water, energy, and min-

    eral resources at depths o meters to a ew kilometers.

    Detailed knowledge o Earths near surace is there-

    ore a crucial part o managing a sustainable environ-

    ment or civilization.

    Near-surace geophysics is undergoing explosive

    growth because o societal interests in assessing the

    impact o human activities on our environment.

    Although the near surace is accessible to drilling and

    excavation, those activities cannot provide the needed

    temporal and spatial resolution and must be comple-

    mented by near-surace geophysics to connect the

    dots. Seismology provides a number o cost-eec-

    tive and noninvasive near-surace imaging methods,

    including the use o reracted, reected, and convertedbody waves, and surace waves to produce 3D and 4D

    (time-varying) subsurace maps that have applica-

    tions or hydrology, civil engineering, earthquake haz-

    ard assessment, archeology, nuclear blast detection, and

    many other critical issues.

    Shallow seismic methods play a key role in determin-

    ing a vast range o geotechnical properties that are

    critical to the built environment. Depth to bedrock,

    the load-bearing strength o shallow materials, and

    the expansive potential o soils can all be estimated

    rom the properties o seismic waves. Seismic stud-ies in conjunction with coring can be used to map

    lateral changes in specic soil horizons beneath con-

    struction sites. Te shear modulus o soils is a critical

    engineering strength parameter or assessing the sta-

    bility o embankments, buildings, and the oundations

    o other structures, and it can be quantied by non-

    invasive seismic shear-wave studies using controlled

    seismic sources and/or background seismic noise. Te

    extent, thickness, and volume o unstable slopes and

    past landslides, and mapping weak horizons at theirbases, can be used to assess hazards and direct mit-

    igation strategies. Microearthquakes along the sides

    and bottoms o landslides can potentially be used as a

    proxy to monitor creep using seismic methods.

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0 5 10 15 20

    140 340 540 740 940 1140 1340 1540 1700

    Velocity (m/s)

    NorthSouth

    h-s (s s) ssss s ss -

    s, qs

    ps q . b s

    p- s ss f-

    . t f

    w s

    . (i

    F. g, a.r. lv, r.g. P, c.a.

    Z, g.l. Fz, 2006. Wv

    p w -

    s: VSP-s s, Geophysics,

    71, h1h11, :10.1190/1.2159049.)

    grand challenge 2

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    26/84

    20

    u n eps m ds

    Si

    d

    ebar

    7

    i -s ss ss (s) s p s v s s vp

    s s. as sp s v, ss s v s qv s p-

    s vs s psss ss s. ms , s pss ss ss

    pss, qs, pss. Sw p vs pp v

    s s ( sss s s p) s ss wv vss. (i

    d.S. d, S.r. F, W.r. W, 2008. S ss c c, u, ps,Science, 321(5886):217, :10.1126/

    s.1157392. rp w pss aaaS).

    Double Couple

    IsotropicImplosion

    ExpandingCrack

    CollapsingCrack

    IsotropicExplosion

    Nuclear and

    other Explosions

    Earthquakes

    Crandall CanyonMine Collapse, UtahAugust 6, 2007

    Cavity Collapses

    Nuclear TestKimchaek, North KoreaOctober 9, 2006

    DUG

    O16A

    P17A

    P18A

    Q16A

    Q18A16 s

    T R V

    Crandall Canyon Seismograms

    DUG O16A O18A

    P18A

    Q16AQ18A

    100 km

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

    Ss ps z

    pss s qs

    ps pss. dvp sp

    ss s p-

    s

    sw p s. ts ss ss s ssp w, W

    W Sz Ssp nw (WWSSn), w p-

    v 100 ss zs s 1960s

    1970s, s w s ssq ss ws.

    t s ss s pp vss

    iriS/uSgS g Ssp nw (gSn), u

    ns cpsv ts b t oz (ctbto)

    i m Ss (imS), u.S. dp

    ds s a F t

    apps c (aFtac), w v,

    , pv ss ws ww. d

    s s ( imS s p-

    ) p v v s p s s ss

    p s vs. op

    s s spp s

    ww ssss vss,

    s, v s. ts sv

    s vs v p v ps ss-

    , p s

    ss s pss s

    ss qs ss. W

    ctbt s , ss w

    p s s

    ps vs ww.

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    27/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    28/84

    22

    SeiSmological aPProacheS and reQuirementS to make ProgreSS

    Develop and broadly disseminate improved 3D

    wave propagation capabilities or extremely hetero-

    geneous media.

    Develop combined active and passive imagingmethodologies using ambient noise.

    Provide dense instrumentation or 4D characteriza-

    tions o near-source environments.

    Explore cross-disciplinary approaches or quanti-

    cation o material properties and their nonlinear

    relationships.

    Increase the number o inexpensive sensors andrecording systems to enable multiscale imaging o

    near-surace environments over large areal extents.

    Add source acilities or high-resolution shallow

    subsurace mapping in diverse environments.

    key QueStionS and iSSueS

    How can the acute heterogeneity in the near sur-

    ace best be imaged and its material properties con-

    strained in diverse applications?

    How do soils respond to strong ground shaking,and how are nonlinear properties o near-surace

    materials best calibrated?

    o what extent can seismology resolve permeability

    and temporal changes in permeability at depth?

    Can physics-based predictions o strong ground

    motion couple with perormance-based engineer-

    ing to improve seismic hazard mitigation?

    How can the National Seismic Hazard Maps be

    improved using advanced physics-based under-

    standing o earthquake ruptures and strongground motions?

    How can time-dependent properties o shallow

    aquiers best be characterized to monitor water and

    contaminant transport?

    Can potential ground ailures rom landslides andkarst be robustly assessed and monitored?

    Can nuclear testing be monitored with con-

    dence levels necessary or the Comprehensive

    est Ban reaty?

    What is the resolution o seismological techniques

    to identiy and locate unexploded ordinance, tun-

    nels, buried landlls, and other human-made sub-

    surace hazards?

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    29/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    30/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    31/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    32/84

    26

    the crust and mantle), 3D rigidity o the lithosphere,

    and identication o the brittle/ductile transition sep-

    arating regions o stick-slip aulting rom ault creep.

    Tese models, combined with topographic and grav-

    ity data, can be used to estimate lithospheric stress and

    to assess the relative contributions between internalorces and plate boundary orces.

    Anisotropy is an imprinted directionality in the

    structural and/or mineral abric that causes seis-

    mic shear waves with dierent shaking directions to

    travel with dierent speeds. Te analysis o modern

    three-component digital seismograms can separate

    these dierent parts o the seismic waveeld to provide

    measures o anisotropy and constraints on the long-

    term history o strain in the lithosphere. Anisotropy

    measurements permit estimation o the magnitude

    and orientation o shear strain in the ductile sublitho-

    spheric mantle (the asthenosphere) and consequentinerences about the orientation o the shear stress at

    the base o the lithosphere. In many cases, seismically

    measured mantle anisotropy is used as a proxy or ow

    or deormation. Tese studies oer unique constraints

    on how ow aects plate motion and the transer o

    stress to and within the lithosphere.

    key QueStionS and iSSueS

    What is the state o stress on active aults and how

    does it vary in space and time?

    What are the stress-strain laws o aults and

    the surrounding crust that give rise to slow and

    ast slip?

    How do pore uids inuence the stress environ-

    ment in ault zones?

    What is the relative importance o static (elas-

    tic) versus dynamic (vibrational) stress changes orearthquake triggering?

    What is the time-dependent rheology (material

    response to orces) and its variability throughout

    the crust and mantle?

    How are new aults initiated and reactivated

    throughout Earth history?

    Are observed statistical characteristics o earth-

    quakes caused by material or geometric heterogene-

    ity or by nonlinear dynamics?

    Can we develop general models o strain accumula-tion and release consistent with geodesy, paleoseis-

    mology, landorm evolution, and laboratory con-

    straints on rheology?

    SeiSmological aPProacheS and reQuirementS to make ProgreSS

    Perorm rapid post-event drilling into ault zones

    guided by 3D seismic imaging to quantiy rictional

    heating and conduct time-dependent hydro-rac-

    ture measurements to quantiy in situ stresses.

    Deploy new oshore ocean bottom seismom-

    eters (OBS), pressure sensors, and seaoor geo-

    detic instruments to understand submarine

    earthquake cycles.

    Increase coordination between dierent disciplines

    making stress and dierential stress measurements.

    Determine changes in ault slip directions over time

    and model relative to absolute stresses.

    Develop robust anisotropic models or the

    lithosphere.

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    33/84

    27

    n Ss hz mps (p://q.ss.v/

    zps/) pv ps ssss s

    s ss u Ss v

    s w s. t sp

    s s, s s pwps - ws pss, qs s

    v ss -s , s w

    vs w v s ps -

    . hs s q v,

    v w spp w pp

    zs, s pss vs

    v . i s s ss p z vs

    s s vs vs v

    v s . avs s-

    pss q p, w s-

    sv p ps, w p

    ps ps s. t s -

    s sp ss vs-s, -s s. m v v-

    qs p pps

    ss, spv. V s

    ss s s p s v.

    t s ss ps s s

    w. F p, ps s, pps

    s, s s s s

    s p v ss.

    Ss Ps hz Ws rps S

    Sid

    eba

    r10

    Ps ss z v y m,nv, sw p (Pga) p-

    s p (P.e.).

    ms s s ws s w

    P.e. 10% 50 s -s ss

    (v sp ps) P.e.

    2% 50 s. t s

    pps - ws ps y

    m s 1 10-8/ (P J.S. Spp i.g.

    W, 2003. Ps ss z ss

    y m, Ps n Ws

    t rvw b, F 24, 2003.) Ps:

    b s s s s

    p s sv v -

    ss (). t kswz-kw

    n Pw P Jp (p ) ws

    J 16, 2007, mw 6.6 cs

    q. a s s

    fs ss. t

    s q s

    , Jps s, s ps s.

    (tp p Jps cs g v b

    nws. m p t e Pw

    cp W n ass P

    l. b p s m. Pv.)

    grand challenge 3

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    34/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    35/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    36/84

    30

    detection and location algorithms. Glacial sources

    that involve oating ice systems, such as calving, excite

    tsunami-like ocean waves that can be detected with

    seismometers deployed both on land and on oating

    ice, and oer additional new opportunities or mon-

    itoring key processes associated with the stability otidewater glaciers and ice shelves.

    Seismic sources within the solid Earth generate waves

    that propagate not only through the ground but also

    through the ocean (e.g., tsunami and -phases),

    atmosphere (e.g., inrasound generated by volcanic

    eruptions and earthquakes), and even the ionosphere,

    where remote sensing using GPS and radar technolo-

    gies hold potential or new ways to characterize the

    sources o large earthquakes. An explosion or distur-bance near Earths surace produces both seismic and

    inrasound energy, the latter being best observed on

    microbarographs or, at high requencies, by micro-

    phones. Atmospheric phenomena including torna-

    dos, meteorite impacts, and lightning strikes can be

    monitored by collocated seismic and inrasound sen-

    sors, providing new constraints on these processes

    and their global occurrence. It may also be viable tocombine seismic and inrasound monitoring to detect

    and quantiy wildres using similar strategies to those

    used or volcanic eruptions. Seismic recordings can

    also sense changes in atmospheric pressure that causes

    ground tilt such as the rare Morning Glory cloud

    ormations observed in Los Angeles and Australia.

    Combining seismic and inrasound recordings can

    help elucidate the way in which sound waves propa-

    gate through the atmosphere, and thereore provide

    a better understanding o atmospheric structure andits variation with time at spatial and temporal scales

    inaccessible by other means.

    css s vvs qv

    ss psss ss

    w ssp sw ssv

    . F p, -q

    ssp ws p s s s/s, w

    s sv ss

    sp. r s ps s

    v ws a

    s p s; s-

    s s-sp

    ss ws a; ss

    s svs -

    ss -p es s

    svs s;

    v v s sw -ss

    s sss p

    p s, s

    w sv ss

    sw qs j -

    w s g. i

    pp, ss q -

    q ss

    ss vv

    p vs.

    css

    Side

    bar

    11

    DJG

    KG

    HG

    SG

    JI

    RI

    NG

    No.

    No.

    Month

    Year

    Glacial earthquakes in Greenland1993-2005

    B) Seasonality

    C) Increase over time

    A) Earthquake locations

    ep v ss s w ss. Ss

    -p vs w gSn ss w j

    s g, sw ss v. (i g. es,

    m. ns V.c. ts, 2006. Ss s q g

    qs, Science, 311(5768):17561758, :10.1126/s.1122112. rp w

    pss aaaS.)

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    37/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    38/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    39/84

    33

    and reservoir management industry. Seismologicaltechniques, including 4D (time-lapse) mapping, are

    increasingly used to monitor the extraction and move-

    ment o hydrocarbons and water in producing elds in

    real time. Seismic exploration and production on land

    and at sea is a multibillion dollar industry with major

    workorce needs now and in the uture.

    Resources are currently being extensively applied

    worldwide to investigate geological reservoirs or their

    carbon dioxide sequestration potential. Methodologies

    or managing such sequestration eorts will rely crit-ically on seismology, both to monitor spatial and

    temporal changes in seismic velocities correspond-

    ing to the uid content, and to detect brittle-ailure-

    induced microearthquakes generated by the injec-

    tion process. Such methodologies are already in place

    in numerous producing hydrocarbon elds to mon-

    itor production and are readily adaptable to carbon

    sequestration applications.

    Ss f s s

    e. t p s-s s

    ss, v p s

    s ss s-v , vp-

    , , , , w

    ss. is ss p 3d ss f

    20 s s s-

    v p, s vp 4d, -

    ps p svs, sv f

    s s . ts s s -

    p p- q

    v. t-s ss f s j -

    s s, sp -

    pss, s w s s ss ps-

    s s. Ss s ss s

    p vp, s p w;

    p w s u Ss s pv v-

    pp pss. cs s p

    p s s sp pp

    s s s. Ss s s s

    - sss s s

    ps, qs, v pss,

    ps s ss. S p -

    q s p

    p p.

    ep Ss rss: e m

    t p s s -s ss

    sv p s svs ps p

    7 . t s, 3d sss ss

    s p s s

    p svs. ts 3d s s pps s vs s s

    . us 3d ss , s s

    p s s

    1990. (Sp b. ds, 2005. The Leading Edge, 24:S46

    S71, Ws gps. F3 ss ss

    F. az, P. g, 2006, Neural Networks and Other Soft

    Computing Techniques with Applications in the Oil Industry, eage b

    Ss, iSbn 90-73781-50-7. Vsz J. l.)

    key QueStionS and iSSueS

    How can we improve the detection, characteriza-

    tion, and production o hydrocarbon resources,

    including detecting deep deposits beneath salt,

    nding small-scale pockets in incompletely

    extracted reservoirs, and monitoring porosity, per-

    meability, and uid ow at high resolution?

    grand challenge 5

    Sidebar1

    3

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    40/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    41/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    42/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    43/84

    37

    changes in the mediums velocity with time as cracks

    open or uids migrate through them. Seismo-acoustic

    monitoring o inrasound signals rom eruptions may

    be able to directly detect and recognize stratospheric

    ash injection and other key eatures o eruptions at

    great distances, providing rapid notication to warnaircrat o hazardous conditions.

    Current eruption prediction methods are primar-

    ily empirically based, because we do not have enough

    inormation or a complete understanding o the

    underlying physical processes. Te geometry o mag-

    matic plumbing systems o volcanoes is poorly known.

    o improve scientic understanding and eruption

    prediction capabilities, it is essential to both improve

    volcano instrumentation networks and to developadvanced methodologies that can better determine the

    physical changes that accompany eruptions, including

    improvements in capabilities to image the interior o

    volcanic systems and to quantitatively characterize

    magma migration and eruption processes.

    In addition to the hazards posed by

    volcanoes, volcanic processes are o

    undamental interest because they

    play a major role in shaping the sur-ace o the planet. Eruptions and

    intrusions o magma are the pri-

    mary o orming new oceanic crust.

    For example, two-thirds o the Earth

    is covered by basaltic oceanic crust

    averaging 7-km thick, all ormed by

    magma rising rom the mantle at

    mid-ocean ridge spreading centers

    at diverging plate boundaries during

    the last 180 million years.

    Hot mantle rocks partially melt and

    generate magma as they rise toward

    the surace at the mid-ocean ridge

    because the rapid drop in pressure

    in the upwelling material causes

    the hot rocks to exceed the melting

    temperature. In contrast, melt production beneath

    volcanic arcs, such as the ring o re surrounding

    the Pacic, is largely created by permeating the warm

    mantle wedge with aqueous uids released rom sub-

    ducted oceanic plates. Tis addition o water lowers

    the melting temperature o the mantle wedge, causingpartial melting and magma ascent. Although magma

    composition, as studied by geochemists and petrolo-

    gists, can reveal the approximate conditions under

    which melting occurred, including pressure, temper-

    ature, and water content, the depth extent o melting

    and the migration pathways or magma rom the deep

    melt production zone up to the surace can only be

    imaged with seismology.

    Beneath mid-ocean ridges, mantle ow models andlow-resolution seismic tomography suggest that par-

    tial melting occurs in a zone more than 100-km across

    at depths as great as 100 km, yet nearly all o it emerges

    at a plate boundary zone that is less than 1-km wide

    at the surace. It is not known whether this ocusing

    0

    40

    80

    120

    160

    200

    100 km 200 300 400

    .08 .04 0 .04 .08

    Vp/Vs

    volcano

    seismographearthquakes

    trench

    tp w P v S v s- z n. t s (s ) s

    ps s s s p. t s p

    s qs ps 175 . Fs s

    s p w p w,

    s p s s v . (i

    e.m. Ss, g.a. as, k.m. Fs, l.g. mkz, c.a. r, J.m. P,

    V. gzz, W. S, 2008. Ss p q -

    s n cs r pp , Geochemistry, Geophysics,

    Geosystems, 9, Q07S08, :10.1029/2008gc001963.)

    grand challenge 6

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    44/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    45/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    46/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    47/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    48/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    49/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    50/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    51/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    52/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    53/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    54/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    55/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    56/84

    50

    Understanding the large-scale patterns o mantle and

    core ow both today and in Earths past is one o the

    Grand Challenges conronting seismology and other

    Earth science disciplines. Issues ranging rom the

    thermal history o the planet to the driving orces o

    present-day tectonics to how the geodynamo gener-ates the magnetic eld and why it undergoes spon-

    taneous reversals are intimately linked to this topic.

    Seismology has contributed greatly over the past three

    decades to constraining present-day deep mantle and

    core structures, and improved resolution is steadily

    being achieved as data accumulate and new analysis

    methods are developed. A proound result o recent

    advances is the recognition that large-scale chemical

    heterogeneity is present in the deep mantle and man-

    tle convection is now being considered in the rame-work o thermo-chemical dynamics, as has long been

    the case or core convection.

    Te very large-scale 3D elastic wave velocity structure

    o the deep mantle is now airly well known and is

    characterized by two massive low-velocity provinces

    (one under Arica and the other under the central

    Pacic) surrounded by aster material. Te aster mate-

    rial appears to be geographically related to present and

    past subduction zones in the upper mantle, althoughcontinuity o seismically imaged ast tabular structures

    throughout the lower mantle is, at best, intermittent.

    Tis observation lends support to the idea o complex

    mass transer between the upper and lower mantle. Te

    large low-velocity structures are slow eatures or both

    P-waves and S-waves, but the S-wave velocity reduc-

    tions are larger than would be expected i the material

    were just relatively warm. Tere are very strong lateral

    gradients in velocity structure at the edges o these

    low-velocity provinces, and analysis o normal modes

    indicates anomalously high-density material in these

    regions. Tese observations constitute strong evidence

    or distinct composition or these large masses in the

    deep mantle, and deep mantle convection must involve

    both thermal and chemical variations.

    grand challenge 9.

    hoW do temPerature andcomPoSition VariationS control

    mantle and core conVection?

    g 3d ( pp s

    - ) ss v s -

    s ss p. r s v v w

    S-wv vs, w s v v s S-wv v-

    s. t s w s w-v s,

    a P ps,

    vs s zs P.

    (i s a. dzws).

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    57/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    58/84

    52

    rom a combination o limitations in global sampling

    by seismic waves due to lack o seismic stations in the

    ocean and in the southern hemisphere, and o limita-

    tions o seismic imaging theory and applications that

    are currently being used. Enhanced data collection and

    imaging o velocity structure at every scale is essential,but there is also the need to improve global anisot-

    ropy and attenuation models, which enhance our abil-

    ity to connect seismological observations to mineral

    physics and geodynamics.

    Seismology constrains the average structure o the

    metallic uid outer core and solid inner core to high

    precision, but it cannot resolve the convective ow eld

    in the outer coregeomagnetic studies are the only

    current approach to doing so. o rst order, there does

    not appear to be detectable seismic velocity heteroge-neity in the outer core, consistent with it being a very

    low-viscosity uid, but there are indications o inho-

    mogeneous in structure in both the uppermost and

    Ss vs es s sps p.a s ( sz es ),

    ps p : s pssv z s -

    ps ps ps

    q , w svs s s

    v s es . i

    ps w s, ss ss v v vs

    s pps ,

    s vs sp.

    t s , s v sp s-

    , s wvs v s

    p p w p q p. b, -

    s s s-

    p, s s s sp. l-s s

    ps ; ss vs ,

    ss wvs s -

    sp ws sp. t s s -s

    (w ) w . a s

    p s p, s pp ps-

    s -pss pss

    sz ss.

    i s p s

    s v .

    t ws svs ss-

    s v P-wvs s

    v sv s ( s -

    p -q ss svs). t v

    s v s, vv s s -

    s p vs s p. tv

    s v s sv fs

    s, p s s.

    t s qs v

    w s

    vs f fw v

    s s .

    cs s s s

    vs v w

    s. c ss, p,

    ss s s w

    , w s s p s s.

    ts pss w s v

    , s p, .

    t mss i c

    Sidebar

    20

    t-s s sp w

    p . t s s w

    P-wvs v ss, w -

    s w s sw vs p. t s

    s w sp. t s pzz w

    s ws sps . t

    ( ) s s sp s

    s. (i s x. S.)

    180

    0

    270 90

    NPNP

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    59/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    60/84

    54

    Ss p v

    s psss

    sps, s, s-

    s s ss, ss sss

    p v. a v ss

    m ap p v

    q

    ms s, -

    ss s , ps

    w-v z p 400 ,

    v w ss v

    v s qs fs s,

    pss s p -

    s . dps ss-

    s p s p

    ss s s qss,

    s s s s p

    q s, w p-

    s w s ms,

    ss s-w

    ep, s -

    Vs. a v p

    pss s ss-

    pps, ss-

    s pv p -

    .

    a sss m w pv pp-

    s p s s qss, : ds

    ms s spp - j p e? W s

    - w m, w s s

    w p qs? W s ps -

    s s w qs

    ssss es v ? a -

    ss p qs s ss

    sps p qs e? a s vs

    s ps s s s? hw

    s ps s, s -

    s 3d p?

    a s ps ss p-

    sss ms, s s-

    , , p sss p ps, ws, s , v-

    . ms s v

    psss, pp s sp w s

    s ss w ss q z-

    s s sp ws. k

    ps ss

    s p, s -

    w/ s, s v-s ss w ps s

    p p. d q ps

    w s v s s s s.

    Vs m ps v -

    s, ss s v

    w . S p s ep,

    g, es s s ss-

    s ps

    fs. ass v pps,

    s ss ps s p-

    pps s s -p . gv

    p v ss s, v

    ss s s ss s -s p ss s

    .

    P Ss

    Sidebar

    21

    bzz a p ss

    m ap 11 ss.

    (i s naSa.)

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    61/84

    55

    Internal boundaries in the Earth are associated with

    the primary compositional layering that resulted rom

    chemical dierentiation o the planet (the crust, man-

    tle, and core) and with mineralogical phase changes

    controlled by pressure and temperature variations (the

    transition zone and deep mantle velocity discontinui-

    ties and the inner core boundary). Tese variations can

    produce signicant accompanying changes in compo-

    sition and rheology. Tese boundaries can thus exert a

    strong inuence on mantle and core convection, par-

    ticularly i they serve as thermal boundary layers, and

    their seismically determined properties can constrain

    internal composition and temperature when calibra-

    tions rom mineral physics are available. Seismology

    can characterize the depth (pres-sure) and elasticity contrasts

    across internal boundaries with

    high precision. Te rontier o

    research now lies in mapping

    the 3D topography and sharp-

    ness o Earths internal boundar-

    ies, which are key to quantiying

    their mineralogical and compo-

    sitional nature. Te seismological

    methods that are needed involvewaveorm modeling and wave-

    eld migrations, complementing

    travel-time tomography, which

    is better or resolving volumetric

    heterogeneities. Detailed imaging

    and interpretation o the ther-

    mal, compositional, and dynam-

    ical processes near Earths inter-

    nal boundaries are the principal

    components o one o the Grand

    Challenges or Seismology.

    Radial models o the mantle

    include globally extensive seis-

    mic velocity jumps near depths

    o 410, 520, and 660 km, which

    are generally attributed to phase

    grand challenge 10.

    hoW are earthS internal boundarieSaFFected by dynamicS?

    S pp S a (p) vs v-

    pp es pp ps s ss

    410 () 660 () p. tpp ss s

    s z ps w e.

    i s , psss s psss, w

    P p sp ss S a.

    (i s n. S.)

    grand challenge 10

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    62/84

    56

    changes in major upper mantle minerals such as oliv-

    ine. Laboratory and theoretical calibration o the

    pressure-temperature-composition behavior o man-

    tle minerals allow seismic observations to be inter-

    preted in terms o absolute temperatures and compo-

    sitional models. Tis allows high-resolution imagingo lateral variations in depth o the discontinuities to

    provide direct constraints on ow across the phase

    transition boundaries. omographic images o sub-

    ducting oceanic lithosphere have established that slabs

    either deect and accumulate in the transition zone or

    penetrate directly into the lower mantle, so it is clear

    that transition zone boundaries can prooundly aect

    mantle convection. Many other upper mantle seismic

    reectors have been detected over localized regions,

    notably under cratons and beneath back-arc basins.Understanding the cause o this seismic velocity

    reectivity and how it is aected by dynamics o the

    mantle wedge may undamentally change our notions

    o the creation and stabilization o continental litho-

    sphere and how it has changed through time.

    Seismic reectors in the deep mantle have also been

    detected, both in 3D scattering images o near-verticalmid-mantle heterogeneities that are plausibly eatures

    produced by ancient subducted slabs, and in reec-

    tions rom the sharp edges o the large low-velocity

    provinces under the Pacic and Arica. Tere is also

    a globally intermittent reector o seismic waves

    ound 200300 km above the core-mantle bound-

    ary. Tis boundary is now widely attributed to the

    recently discovered mineralogical phase transition

    rom the most abundant mineral in the lower man-

    tle (magnesium-silicate perovskite) to a high-pressure(post-perovskite) polymorph. Seismic waves also

    reveal the presence o an extensive, but intermittent,

    100km

    200km

    300km

    400km

    500km

    600km

    0km

    TongaTrench

    css ss 3d

    ss

    S-wv fv w

    j s t s. Qs-

    z ss s w

    s pp p s.

    (i s y. Z.)

    grand challengeS For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    63/84

    57

    very thin (< 30 km) ultra-low veloc-

    ity zone located just above the core-

    mantle boundary. Tis low-velocity

    zone is commonly attributed to par-

    tial melt being present in the hottest

    part o the thermal boundary layer,although strong chemical contrasts

    may also be involved. All o these

    seismological structures have impli-

    cations or deep mantle dynamics.

    Analysis o boundary layer pro-

    cesses provides internal tempera-

    ture probes along with constraints

    on rheology and composition.

    Improved seismological constraintsplay a unique role in discovering and

    understanding these boundaries.

    400 km

    CMB100 km

    X2

    X1L2

    L2

    L1

    L1L1

    310km0

    phase transition height above CMB [21]

    m S-wv f s - (2) p f-

    250 v - (1). (i r.d. v hs, m.V.

    hp, P. W, S.-h. S, P. m, l. t, 2007. Sssp

    s es - , Science, 315:18131817, :10.1126/

    s.1137867. rp w pss aaaS.)

    key QueStionS and iSSueS

    How sharp are internal mantle and core boundaries?

    What is the multiscale topographic structure and

    lateral extent o mantle boundaries, including the

    core-mantle boundary?

    What are the eects o the transition zone bound-

    aries on mass ux between the upper and lower

    mantle?

    Are there thermal boundary layers that serve as

    sources o mantle plumes at any o the internal

    boundaries?

    Is post-perovskite present in the mantle and does it

    exist in lenses or as a layer?

    What is the cause o the ultra-low velocity zone at

    the base o the mantle, and how has it evolved?

    How can seismological observations constrain heat

    ux across the boundaries?

    o what degree are variations in water content and

    chemical heterogeneity responsible or topography

    on mantle discontinuities?

    Can we detect time-dependent changes in bound-

    ary properties?

    Are there stable thermo-chemical boundary layers

    in the outermost outer and lowermost outer core?

    What causes hemispherical variations just below

    the inner core boundary and what is the source o

    deeper anisotropy?

    grand challenge 10

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    64/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    65/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    66/84

    60

    enhancing acceSS to high-PerFormance comPuting caPabilitieS

    building and SuStaining the ProFeSSional PiPeline

    Increasingly massive seismic data sets, very large inver-

    sions or 3D and 4D multiscale models o Earths inte-

    rior, and robust orward calculations o broadband seis-

    mic ground motions or realistic, nonlinear eects o

    earthquake and explosion sources as well as 3D struc-

    ture present enormous computational challenges that

    exceed the capabilities o the most advanced comput-

    ers presently available. Advancing seismology research

    at universities and elsewhere will rely on access to

    resources ranging rom moderate-size, in-house com-

    puter workstations and clusters to large-scale computa-

    tional capabilities, such as those at national laboratories

    in tandem with integrated cyberinrastructure net-

    works such as eraGrid. Access to high-perormance

    Key to all undertakings in seismology is maintaining

    and supporting a steady pipeline o talented people

    with solid quantitative skills into university programs

    that provide undergraduate and graduate training inundamentals and applications o seismological theory

    and prepare new seismologists or tomorrows chal-

    lenges. Retention o this talent and expertise in indus-

    try, national laboratory, academic, regulatory, state, and

    ederal agency careers requires continued collaboration

    among academia, unding agencies, and employers to

    establish sustained supporting structures. Te seismol-

    ogy workorce demands o industry are not presently

    being ully met and new and stronger partnerships

    between relevant industries (e.g., energy, insurance,engineering) and academic programs should be devel-

    oped to attract undergraduates and graduate students

    to the discipline.

    Attracting top students to this exciting and important

    discipline requires improved outreach that highlights

    its many societal contributions and exciting research

    computing, coupled with urther improvements in the

    standardization and dissemination o advanced seis-

    mic sotware (such as is currently being pursued by the

    NSF Computational Inrastructure or Geodynamics

    [CIG] initiative), is essential to advancing the disci-

    pline, both in acilitating new methodological break-

    throughs and in providing access to state-o-the-art

    capabilities to more institutions.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Make available to the broad research community

    careully vetted seismological sotware and pro-

    cessing tools, along with integrative data products.

    Tere is also a special need in developing coun-

    rontiers. Broadly based eorts to enhance public

    awareness o the importance o the discipline, as con-

    ducted by Education and Outreach (E&O) eorts o

    IRIS, SCEC, and EarthScope as well as many uni-versity programs, are highly benecial long-term

    investments that play a critical role in showcasing the

    importance o seismology and its numerous contribu-

    tions to society.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Further engage seismology community organiza-

    tions with industry to increase awareness o oppor-

    tunities in seismology among undergraduates and

    high school students. Expand E&O eorts o these organizations to pro-

    mulgate public awareness o the discipline and its

    societal contributions, and support undergraduate

    and graduate training materials and enhanced edu-

    cational opportunities.

    SuStaining a healthy Future For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    67/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    68/84

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    69/84

    63

    scientic advances, to broaden the pool o academic

    groups conducting such work, to advance partnership

    opportunities with industry, and to enhance core edu-

    cational opportunities or Earth science students.

    Te vibrator trucks o the Network or EarthquakeEngineering Simulation (NEES) acility could be

    made more available or seismological research on

    very shallow structure, which may require increased

    exibility in the current operation o this acility.

    NEES vibrators lack sufcient capabilities or crustal-

    scale imaging. Te controlled-source seismic imag-

    ing eorts o the USGS have substantially diminished

    over the past several decades, and there is no longer a

    dedicated internal program to collaborate with uni-

    versities in the permitting and handling o buriedexplosive sources, which requires highly specialized

    expertise and is acilitated by government participa-

    tion. Drilling shot holes or explosives and vibrator

    truck arrays can both be subcontracted commercially,

    but the substantial cost is a signicant impediment to

    most researchers and current research program bud-

    gets. Establishing a broad-based community source

    acility, including drill rigs, explosive-handling capabil-

    ity, and a vibrator array, and integrating the needs and

    resources o IRIS, USGS, and NEES, would sustain

    the health o active seismic imaging at all scales. Tis

    acility could work on a model similar to DOSECC,

    which provides scientic drilling rigs, combined withexpertise or the contract hiring o industry rigs where

    appropriate and cost eective.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Establish a acility or collection o acilities or

    sources used in active-source seismology so that

    research programs and education in this area can be

    sustained. Tis acility could possibly be developed

    through access to the vibrator trucks o NEES,

    reinvigorated participation o the USGS in active-source seismology, and in partnership with industry.

    Improve interactions among academic, governmen-

    tal, and industrial eorts in active-source seismol-

    ogy to sustain the discipline.

    Expand the ability to conduct 3D active-source

    imaging at sea.

    Producing adVanced SeiS mological data ProductS

    Te diverse applications o seismology or basic

    research and environmental monitoring all benet

    rom the long-standing eorts to produce catalogs o

    earthquake parameters (location, origin time, mag-

    nitude) and mathematical representations o Earth

    structure (1D, 2D, and 3D seismic velocity and den-

    sity distributions). Seismic source catalogs and mod-

    els are used widely beyond seismology, extending the

    disciplinary impact to earthquake engineering, earth-

    quake insurance, geotechnical, geological, and geo-

    chemical arenas. Indeed, the principal seismic data

    or most o these communities are earthquake cata-

    logs rather than seismograms. It is incumbent upon

    the discipline to provide the most reliable and com-

    prehensive compilations o seismological knowledge

    to all users. However, the distributed nature o the

    many eorts that produce earthquake parameter lists

    and Earth models on various scales leads to an array

    o products that lack clear authoritative validation and

    easy access. Te widespread use o the 1D Preliminary

    Reerence Earth Model (PREM), produced in 1981,

    clearly demonstrates the importance o well-dened

    syntheses o seismological knowledge.

    Recent advances in data quality and availability,

    advanced processing methods, and computational

    capabilities enable signicant improvements in earth-

    quake catalogs and Earth models, yet there is not a

    dedicated eort to systematically enhance these unda-

    mental seismological products. It is realistic to commit

    SuStaining a healthy Future For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    70/84

    64

    enhancing Free an d oPen acceSS to data

    Seismology is an intrinsically global and interna-

    tional undertaking, and it relies upon strong coordi-

    nation and cooperation among governments, interna-

    tional organizations, and universities. Seismological

    contributions are greatly served by global open access

    to real-time seismic data rom all international data-

    collection activities, building on the examples o the

    USGS NEIC, IRIS DMC, and FDSN-participant

    data centers, along with many U.S. university pro-

    grams. Eorts to provide access to data that are not

    now reely available, such as the IMS seismic record-

    ings, thousands o instruments in national regional

    recording systems, and other currently restricted

    seismic data sets, will enhance multi-use o the cor-

    responding signals or investigating important top-

    ics in the Earth system. Global concerns about earth-

    quake hazards, environmental change, and nuclear

    testing present many opportunities or international

    partnerships and interactions on technology transer,

    capacity-building, condence-building, and integra-

    tive hazard assessment that are all complemented by

    basic research. Te advanced state-o-the-art o seis-

    mology in the developed world can be leveraged to

    enranchise and bolster progress in developing nations

    that are struggling to deal with challenging hazard

    issues and limited resources.

    to monitoring almost all seismicity on all continents

    down to magnitude ~ 3 events, and beneath the oceans

    down to magnitude ~ 4, over the next decade. Event

    location accuracy can be systematically improved on

    large and even global scales, with relative locations as

    accurate as a ew hundred meters rather than currentlevels o a ew to tens o kilometers. Integration o cat-

    alogs rom various seismic systems into an authorita-

    tive, readily accessible global seismic source database

    would benet basic research, applied research, and

    many societal applications that use seismicity distri-

    butions. It is also realistic to commit to developing a

    consensus 3D Earth model as a reerence structure

    or diverse applications. Tis is a very complex under-

    taking and should be coordinated at the agency level,

    with an understanding that models evolve and requireupdating as data and methods improve.

    Natural disasters provide both learning and teaching

    opportunities that can be exploited i inrastructure

    is in place in advance. Rapid responses to exploit the

    window o opportunity or making critical transient

    observations (e.g., ault-zone drilling, hydrological

    monitoring, atershock recording, volcanic deorma-

    tions) must be planned in advance. Rapid dissemina-

    tion o seismological inormation to educators, emer-

    gency response coordinators and the general public

    also requires in-place inrastructure.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Integrate regional and global seismic bulletins intoan openly available, denitive international seismic

    source catalog.

    Commit to improving earthquake location accu-

    racies on large scales by using advanced process-

    ing methods and strive to complete catalogs down

    to levels o magnitude 3 in continents and 4 in

    oceanic regions.

    Develop a 3D Earth model as the next generation

    community model beyond PREM, describing the

    anelastic, anisotropic, aspherical Earth structure bystandardized parameterization that can be used by

    multiple disciplines.

    Provide ready access to products o seismologi-

    cal research in orms that are useul to ellow Earth

    scientists to acilitate dissemination o seismologi-

    cal knowledge.

    Expand inrastructure or learning rom disas-

    ters and mounting scientic response, along with

    improved outreach with inormation or the public.

    SuStaining a healthy Future For SeiSmology

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    71/84

    65

    enhanced interdiSciPlinary coordination

    Progress on the Seismological Grand Challenges listed

    in this long-range plan and the many societal appli-

    cations o seismology hinges on improved interdisci-

    plinary interactions and communications. Strong syn-

    ergisms exist within the Earth science arena between

    seismology and other disciplines, such as geodesy, geo-dynamics, mineral physics, geology, and geochemistry.

    Tese connections are ostered by proessional societies

    such as the American Geophysical Union (AGU), the

    Society o Exploration Geophysicists (SEG), and the

    International Association or Seismology and Physics

    o Earths Interior (IASPEI). Research coordination

    is abetted by NSF-unded community organizations

    and consortia such as IRIS, the Southern Caliornia

    Earthquake Center (SCEC), the Cooperative Institute

    or Deep Earth Research (CIDER), the Consortiumor Materials Properties Research in Earth Sciences

    (COMPRES), and the geodetic consortium

    UNAVCO. NSF programs such as EarthScope,

    MARGINS, RIDGE, and CSEDI also enhance mul-

    tidisciplinary communications. Coordination with the

    National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON)

    can augment societal applications o seismology. Te

    United States has only limited ties between industry

    and academia or workorce training and technology

    development in active-source seismology. Many o the

    novel seismological areas o research identied in this

    document, including some aspects o atmospheric, cli-

    mate, and ocean research, are at early stages in build-

    ing constructive coordination among science commu-nities, unding agencies, and industry.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Sustain multidisciplinary integration eorts and

    oster improved communications and coordina-

    tion on seismology activities among NSF divi-

    sions o Earth Sciences, Ocean Sciences, and

    Atmospheric Sciences, and the Ofce o Polar

    Programs. Overcome existing institutional barri-

    ers to optimal cross-divisional seismology activitiesthrough coordination at the Geoscience Directorate

    level o NSF.

    Encourage ederal and state agencies, universi-

    ties, and scientic organizations to support inter-

    disciplinary workshops on critical interaces in the

    shallow Earth system, extreme environments, deep

    Earth processes, and environmental change with

    active participation by seismologists.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Continue to have ederal programs and seismology

    organizations strongly advocate or open access to

    seismic data on a global basis, with real-time access

    to the greatest extent possible.

    Communicate and oster seismological capabilities

    or addressing hazards and environmental moni-

    toring concerns and data exchange with developing

    nations through coordinated international eorts.

    SuStaining a healthy Future For SeiSmology

    adVanceS in inStrumentation

    echnological advances permeate the discipline o

    seismology, which has been a scientic leader in

    embracing advances in computer storage, digital pro-

    cessing, telecommunications, Internet dissemination

    o inormation, and other technologies. Specic to

    the discipline are needs or urther advances in seis-

    mic sensors and high-resolution data acquisition. Te

    current sensors or recording very broadband (VBB)

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    72/84

    66 SuStaining a healthy Future For SeiSmology

    seismic data at the long-period end o seismic ground

    motions (Streckeisen SS-1 sensors deployed in many

    seismic networks) are no longer being produced and

    will need replacement as they age. Development o a

    next-generation VBB sensor is a high priority, and is

    required to ensure on-scale, complete recordings othe very largest earthquakes, such as the 2004 Sumatra

    tsunami earthquake, and to record with high delity

    Earths ree oscillations, slow earthquake motions, and

    very-long-period noise arising rom oceanic, atmo-

    spheric, and other sources. New micro-electro mechan-

    ical systems (MEMS) are being designed to sense

    short-period ground vibrations, and urther develop-

    ment o this technology may soon enable vast increases

    in numbers o inexpensive sensors that can provide

    high-density sampling o ground motions in urban andremote areas. Extension o the usable period band or

    MEMS or other novel low-cost sensors to the range

    o tens o seconds would usher in a revolution in seis-

    mic tomography o the deep Earth by acilitating 3D

    and 4D crust and mantle imaging experiments using

    orders o magnitude more receivers than are eldable

    with current (e.g., IRIS PASSCAL) seismometer tech-

    nology. New seismic sensors or hostile environments

    (extreme cold, ocean bottom, deep boreholes, and

    extraterrestrial environments) are critical or expand-ing the scientic reach o seismology and or address-

    ing the disciplines Grand Challenges. University par-

    ticipation in seismic instrumentation development

    has diminished over time, and sustaining specialized

    expertise in ground-motion measurement technolo-

    gies is a challenge that conronts the discipline.

    RECOMMENDATIONS

    Encourage collaborations across ederal agencies

    that utilize very broadband seismic data or moni-

    toring purposes to support development o next-

    generation very broadband seismometers to replace

    current instruments. Explore MEMS technologies to develop low-

    cost seismic sensors that can be deployed in great

    numbers and can supplement or replace current

    seismometers.

    Increase the number o strong motion instruments

    near aults and in urban areas to improve con-

    straints on rupture processes and to better under-

    stand the relationship between ground motion and

    building damage.

    Continue to develop next-generation telemeteredseismic instrumentation in hostile environments

    (e.g., volcanoes, glaciers, seaoor).

    Develop partnerships among industry, national lab-

    oratories, academia, and ederal agencies to advance

    and sustain seismic instrumentation innovation

    and capabilities.

    Sustain existing permanent networks, such as

    the GSN and ANSS, as long-term observa-

    tional systems or both research and monitoring,

    through stable unding rom multi-agency part-ners and continued upgrades to improve reliability

    and efciency.

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    73/84

    67

    eismology is an exciting, vigorous, and important discipline, with broad relevance

    to major challenges conronting society, including environmental change, cop-

    ing with natural hazards, energy resource development, and national security.

    Seismology provides the highest-resolution probes o inaccessible regions o Earths

    interior rom shallow crustal sediments to the central core, and thus plays a primaryrole in eorts to understand the structure and dynamics o Earths many internal sys-

    tems. Te discipline has grown to its current prominence by sustained ederal support

    o basic research, which ensures training o new generations o seismologists via uni-

    versity research programs, along with technical developments that enhance applied

    research in nuclear monitoring, exploration and resource management seismology,

    earthquake and volcano hazard monitoring, and environmental change evaluation.

    Looking to the next 10 to 20 years, the seismological community has herein dened

    10 Grand Challenge basic research questions where seismology oers the opportu-

    nity or undamental contributions. Tese topics all address Earth systems that can beprobed and quantied using seismological techniques. Tis document identies scien-

    tic challenges and opportunities or basic research in seismology to be supported by

    ederal, university, state, and industry programs. It is hoped that this document will use-

    ully inorm and inspire program managers and agency directors to help advance and

    sustain the critical in rastructure, workorce, and scientic capabilities necessary or the

    eld to ully realize its potential contributions to science and to society at large.

    S

    Summary

    Summary

  • 7/29/2019 SEIS01

    74/84

    68

    eismological approaches to solving the Grand Challenges described in this

    document include a plethora o analysis techniques and distinct seismic wave

    analyses. Underlying all o the methods are some intrinsic attributes o the

    discipline that warrant discussion. Tese include the practices o monitoring Earths

    natural and human-made sources, and the practices o imaging Earths systems and

    modeling the ground shaking using the resulting Earth models.

    S

    aPPendixkey SeiSmological PracticeS

    monitoring dynamic ProceSSeS

    in earthS enVironment

    Earthquakes, volcanoes, ocean storms, glacial ows,and many other natural sources are located, identi-

    ed, and quantied through undamental monitor-

    ing practices o seismology. Tese practices require

    long-term operation o many seismometers in arrays

    and networks o various scales with continuous data

    telemetry. Monitoring operations include sparse

    global seismographic networks with very broadband

    recording capabilities, dense regional networks with

    high-resolution capabilities, and temporary deploy-

    ments in remote ar