SELECTING EXTERIOR TOPCOATS BASED ON AESTHETIC PERFORMANCE
COATINGS & ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT
What is a Coating Polymer? • A carbon chain created primarily with by-products
of the petroleum industry. These polymers, also known as “resins”, provide the framework for which the coating’s performance is built upon
• Examples of a coating polymer include: ─ Epoxy ─ Urethane ─ Acrylic ─ Fluoropolymer
What Causes Coating Degradation? • Light Exposure
– Primarily Ultraviolet (UV) light, along with oxygen and water, can induce slow degradation (aging) of many organic polymers found in coatings
• Elements
─ Temperature fluctuations, pollution, chemical exposures, rain, etc. can also contribute to degradation, usually accelerating the process
Radiant Energy The Earth’s atmosphere filters and absorbs most of the more powerful shorter wavelength radiation, including UV light.
UV light harmlessly passes through film to the substrate
UV light is reflected from coating surface
Coatings absorb UV light but dissipate it as harmless heat
Transmission
Reflection
Absorption
Responses of Radiant Energy
Mechanisms of Coating Degradation • UV light absorbed by a coating excites the polymer,
raising the energy level that must be eliminated
• This energy breaks the primary polymer bonds, creating free radicals and begins a chain reaction of degradation if UV exposure continues
• Depending on resin type, once degradation begins, a rapid breakdown will occur
Increasing UV Resistance
• UV Resistant Binders
• Reflective Pigments
• UV Absorbing Pigments
• UV Inhibitors
PIGMENT SELECTION
Organic Pigments • Synthetic • Less color stable than inorganic • Bright organic colors are less
expensive than bright inorganic
Organic vs. Inorganic
Inorganic Pigments • Naturally occurring; metal based • Color stable • Less susceptible to free radicals • Bright colors are more expensive to
produce
Pigment Quality
• There are various grades of both inorganic and organic pigments
• Quality and performance can depend on: ─ Material make-up Carbon content Pigment color
─ Technology (organic vs. inorganic) Resistance to free radicals
EFFECTS OF ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT COLOR AND GLOSS
Ultraviolet Light (UV) on Color & Gloss • Damage caused by UV light can discolor
the binder, fade pigments and affect gloss
Acrylic Polyurethane
FEVE Fluoropolymer
Panel demonstrates coating performance after 10,000 hrs. QUV-A Exposure
Viewing Gloss
High gloss Low gloss
High gloss – Light is reflected causing coating to look brighter
Low gloss – Light is diffused causing coating to look duller
Viewing Color • Color, or color perception, can be greatly affected by a light
source or type
– Color indoors can be perceived much different than the same color outdoors
– Exact color and color differences can be determined using color equipment
– View color selection in same light source as exposure.
Comparing Color • Color and color differences can be
measured in Delta E (DE) in different ways: – CIELAB2000 – CMC – FMC II – Hunter
• Measurement scale should always be stated when comparing color
TOPCOAT SELECTION BASED ON GENERIC TYPE
Generic Coating Types • Epoxies
• Alkyds
• Acrylics
• Polyurethanes
• Polysiloxanes
• FEVE Fluoropolymers Control 6 Months Exp.
Waterbased Epoxy (black)
Epoxies
Control 6 Months Exp.
UV Light Performance • Poor UV stability Color • Yellowing of binder
• Fading of pigment • Chalking
Gloss • Extreme loss
These chemical and abrasion resistant coatings generally degrade in UV light due to absorption by a polymer chain in the binder. Epoxies are not recommended as topcoats when aesthetics are required.
Alkyds UV Light Performance • Poor to moderate
(depending on quality of oil)
Color • Some discoloration of binder Fading of pigments
• Chalking
Gloss • Will decrease at an accelerated rate
Alkyds’ convenient application make them widely used and can provide basic UV performance if comprised of quality materials.
Acrylics
While acrylic binder is not highly affected by UV, additives used to decrease cost and lower priced pigments can cause performance to decrease dramatically.
UV Light Performance • Good to very good Color • Little change to binder
• Possible fading of pigments Gloss • Moderate rate of loss
Aliphatic Polyurethanes
Binder is not highly affected by UV, but less costly additives and pigments can greatly affect performance. Generally provide good color and gloss retention.
UV Light Performance • Very good Color • Little change to binder
• Slow fading of pigments Gloss • Slow rate of loss
Polysiloxanes
Polysiloxanes typically utilize epoxy, acrylic or urethane binders. Those with acrylics and urethanes will outperform epoxy versions in both color and gloss.
UV Light Performance Very good Color Some yellowing of binder (epoxy)
Less potential fading of pigments
Gloss Slow rate of loss
FEVE Fluoropolymers
Fluoropolymers’ utilize binders that have a tenacious chemical bond, which are not highly affected by UV and typically use additives and pigments of high quality that do not affect color and gloss performance.
UV Light Performance Excellent Color Outstanding binder
Very good pigment tolerance to UV exposure
Gloss Extremely slow rate of loss
Life-Cycle Cost of Topcoat – Aesthetics Only 20 Year Life-Cycle of 30,000 FT2
Polymer Type
# of Applications
Years Between Touch-Up/Recoat
Service Life
Final Cost
Alkyd 5 3-4 Years 20 Years $ 230,625.00
Acrylic 3 4-6 Years 20 Years $ 140,625.00
Polyurethane 2 7-10 Years 20 Years $ 96,000.00
Polysiloxane 2 10-15 Years 20 Years $ 77,625.00
Fluoropolymer (FEVE) 1 15-20 Years 20 Years $ 71,250.00
Note: Figures listed are for topcoats only; they do not include primer and intermediate coat application and material costs.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS COATING PERFORMANCE AND TESTING
Other Factors, Which Can Affect Aesthetics • Surface preparation • Coating compatibility
─ Complete coating system selection • Performance for specific environments • Application equipment & technique • Specification requirements
Writing Specifications • Write performance based specifications with standards and
minimum result requirements • Place coatings in Division 9: Section 09 96 00 High-
Performance Coatings • Utilize Division 9 “Sub-Sections” to better define the scope
of work & differentiate critical design elements • Seek assistance for side-by-side comparison of products
considered for substitution • Request slight, but noticeable variation in color between
intermediate coat and topcoat to ensure proper coverage.
• By incorporating performance standards into a specification, the owner is assured suitable, high-quality products − South Florida/Arizona exposures − AAMA (weathering standards only) − EMMAQUA: ASTM D 4141 − QUV: ASTM G 53 or ASTM D 4587 − Prohesion: ASTM G 85 − Salt Fog: ASTM B 117
Specifications
Exterior Testing
• Florida Exposure – Various angles to the sun – Extreme sun exposure – Salt air and spray
• Arizona Exposure ─ Intense Heat ─ Various exposure angles ─ Minimum cloud cover to
maximize radiation exposure ─ Dry harsh conditions
Real World Limitations • High-performance coating systems
could take 20 years before coating degradation
• Coating technology is dynamic and initial performance results are required quickly
Accelerated Testing
• UV Exposure • Sunlight Concentrator
– EMMAQUA • UV/Prohesion • Humidity
• Natural exposures can take years to obtain results
• Accelerated testing is utilized to emulate natural exposures with high concentrations of elements.
Accelerated Weathering • UV Exposure (QUV-A)
− Closely simulates natural sun − Cycles Include: 4 hours UV/4 hours condensation 8 hours UV/4 hours condensation
• EMMAQUA − Equatorial mount with mirrors and
water − Intensity of 8 suns − Tracks sun movement
Gloss Retention (White)— QUV Exposure (ASTM D 4587)
Color Change (White)— QUV Exposure (ASTM D 4587)
Importance of Systems
Unprimed 32 hrs.
Alkyd 500 hrs.
Epoxy 4,000 hrs.
Zinc-Rich Urethane 10,000 hrs.
Utilizing Results • Performance specification and minimum
results based on both laboratory and natural exposures
• Key Criteria ─ Color retention - Delta E (color space) ─ Gloss Retention (change from standard) ─ Chalking ─ Adhesion (system must remain in place)
• Retain sample panels • Product warranty required (outline acceptable
ranges)
CASE STUDIES EXTENDING PERFORMANCE WITH FEVE FLUOROPOLYMERS
Water Storage Tank Mt. Jackson, VA Finish Coat:
FEVE Fluoropolymer
OBSERVATION DECK PORT CANVERAL, FL
Finish Coat: FEVE Fluoropolymer
CAST IRON FAÇADE SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Finish Coat: FEVE Fluoropolymer (Metallic)
High Rise—New York, NY 12+ years of Performance (2002) Finish Coat:
FEVE Fluoropolymer (Metallic)
Important Points • UV light degrades coatings by activating free radicals in
binder, pigments and additives. • Various binders react differently to free radicals. Additives
can also be used to limit their effect. • Color and gloss retention depends on performance of binder,
pigments and additives. • High-performance coatings like FEVE Fluoropolymers, despite
being more expensive, provide longer-term aesthetic performance and lower life-cycle cost.
Thank you for your participation in today’s presentation. QUESTIONS?