+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR) REGULATORY IMPACT … · SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR)...

SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR) REGULATORY IMPACT … · SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR)...

Date post: 22-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 9 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
22
SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR) REGULATORY IMPACT ON VESSEL OPERATION Dec. 3, 2015 WorkBoat International Thomas Spinks, Ph.D. Tenneco Inc.
Transcript

S E L E C T I V E C ATA LY T I C R E D U C T I O N ( S C R )

REGULATORY IMPACT ON VESSEL OPERATION

Dec. 3, 2015 • WorkBoat International

Thomas Spinks, Ph.D.

Tenneco Inc.

2

Pioneering global ideas for cleaner air and smoother, quieter and safer transportation

2014 Revenue – $8.4 Billion

Two Strong Product Lines

STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES

• Global regulatory expertise

• Foundation in core sciences

• Total systems integration

• Cost-effective global market solutions

– Light vehicle

– Commercial vehicle

– Large engines

• China specific solutions

• Large platform lifecycle services

Healthier Lives

Tenneco Overview

3

Tenneco Global Operations

Nearly 29,000 employees serving customers globally from

More than 90 manufacturing facilities and 15 engineering and technical centers

3

Headquarters

Clean Air Manufacturing

Ride Performance Manufacturing

Clean Air Engineering

Ride Performance Engineering

4

Challenge AcceptedLarge Engine Technical Focus

Resources committed to the marine market

Kunshan China Technical Center

• Global center of excellence – Large engine– Marine

– Locomotive

– Stationary

• Comprehensive engineering services

• State-of-the-art equipment

5

Regulatory EvolutionUnprecedented Speed of Change

IMO Tier III & U.S. EPA Tier 4:A new era of uncharted waters

for the marine industry

▪ 2012 ▪ 2013 ▪ 2014 40+ Years of regulation MOVES…

…On Road

…Off Road

…No Road

1975 → 2000 ▪ 2001 ▪ 2002 ▪ 2003 ▪ 2004 ▪ 2005 ▪ 2006

▪ 2007 ▪ 2008 ▪ 2009 ▪ 2010 ▪ 2011

▪ 2015 →

6

Emission Regulation Overview

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Global

Europe

USA

Russia

China

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Marine IMO Tier 3

Locomotive (Stage IIIB) Locomotive (Stage V)

Marine, Gensets (Stage V)

Marine (EPA4) 2014-2017 phase in

Off-road, Locomotive (EPA4)

Locomotive (Stage IV)

Off-road Stage IV (Estimated)

Marine (Tier 3)

7

Regulatory ChallengeU.S. EPA Tier 4

Figures Source: ”Marine and Locomotive Repowers EPA Presentation from EPA.gov”, EPA, 2011.

Regulation impacts virtually all U.S. flagged vessels

• All marine diesels on U.S. flagged vessels– High and medium speed diesel engines

• > 800 hp (600 kW)

• < 30 liters per cylinder

• New and remanufactured engines

• Emergency standby and national

security exemptions

• Effective date:– 2014 for > 2000 kW

– 2016 for > 1400 kW

– 2017 for > 600 kW

• 40 CFR 1042

8

Regulatory Challenge Impacts Virtually ALL Workboats

Compliance is NOT optional

9

-18 -2 0 +2 4 6 8

gain ∆BSFC, g/kWh penalty

– 5%

– 20%

– 20%

– 30%

– 50%

– 70%

-90%

Basis, IMO Tuning

Low-NOx Tuning

Low-NOx Injection

Water-fuel emulsion

RT-flex + emulsion

Direct Water Injection

EGR

SCR

0 20 40 60 80 100

NOx Control Technologies NOx emissions, % ∆NOx

Regulatory ChallengeSCR – The Best Cost /Benefit Solution

Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) provides both emission reduction and fuel economy improvements

Proven best cost /benefit solutionSource: Wartsila

New regulation – New COST considerations

10

Full System Response

Balanced, methodical, full-system approach to meet the challenge

Offer classified NOx abatement products to the marine market• Urea dosing system

• U.S. EPA Tier 4 SCR catalyst

• IMO Tier III SCR catalyst

• Various fuel options

• Classification requirements

11

SCRHow it works

12

FDS

(Fluid Delivery SystemIncluding controller,

and on-board diagnostic functions)

SCR Reactor

(3-toe design for low sulfur fuelHigh cell density substrate)

Ammonia(NH3) Processor

(Integrated with Common Rail, Electronics for adaptive control,

and Urea Mixer to achieve excellent NH3 uniformity)

Main Wire Harness Common RailInjector Human Machine Interface (HMI)

Complete, compact dosing control solution for SCR aftertreatmentfor mechanical and electronic engines

Challenge AcceptedTurnkey Marine Solution

13

Deck A

Deck B

H≤2m

• System can pump

urea 10m high

• System can manage

urea lines 120m in

total length

• Urea pump does

not need to be

installed close to

aftertreatment

system

Challenge AcceptedOn Ship Installation Flexibility

Flexible architecture accommodates vessel constraints

14

Challenge AcceptedUser Friendly On-board Diagnostics

HMI on board – Galveston Tx

Programmable system provides over 100 OBD checks

• Communication methods– CAN bus signal interface

– Audible alarm

• 4” HMI Screen

• 10” Remote Human Machine

Interface (HMI) Screen

– Easy to use, intuitive screens

15

System is easy to manage on board a vessel

• No special tools required

– Common tools for assemble and

disassemble

• No special training

Challenge AcceptedService & Maintenance

Ease-of-use characteristics leverage existing crew capabilities

16

ABS product design assessments and DNV GL classification achieved

Challenge AcceptedClassified Product Offering

EPA Catalyst

Hardware

300 CPSI coated

catalysts

Three Toe Geometry

IMO Catalyst

Hardware

140 CPSI extruded

catalyst

Single Toe Geometry

Large Engine

Dosing System

Controller, Pump,

Filter, Injector, and

Human Machine

Interface

Large Engine Dosing

System

Large Engine SCR

System

17

Challenge AcceptedMaintain Engine Room Integrity

Use of images of and/or information about U.S. Department of Transportation assets does not imply or constitute U.S. Government, agency, or sub-agency endorsement of any program, entity, or enterprise.

Tenneco full system SCR system seamlessly integrates within the existing engine room

18

Tier 0 (circa 1984) engine met IMO TIER III emission targets

Challenge MetFreshwater Demonstration Achieves Targets

Use of images of and/or information about U.S. Department of Transportation assets does not imply or constitute U.S. Government, agency, or sub-agency endorsement of any program, entity, or enterprise.

System level fleet

validation• Full system installed in port

• Fresh water (Great Lakes)

• Engine data: Caterpillar D398 1984;

680kw

Proven functionality

and emission reduction

performance while docked

on a 31 year old engine!

19

Challenge MetSaltwater Demonstration Achieves Target

System level fleet

validation• Full system

• Salt water (Gulf of Mexico)

• Engine data: Caterpillar D398,

1982; 680kw

Proven functionality and

emission reduction

performance while sailing

in the Gulf on a 33 year old engine!

EPA Tier 0 (circa 1982) engine met EPA Tier 4 emission targets

20

Regulating emissions is REAL and is impacting the marine industry

Summary

ResultsMarine Challenges

• Compliance with regulation

• Limited engine room space

• No dry dock

• System commissioning using state-of-the-art technology

• OBD / user friendly

• Ease in maintenance and serviceability

• Obtaining Marine Classification

Q&A

21

22

THANK YOUWe Welcome Further Discussion at Booth 1117


Recommended